Involvement of spinal μ1-opioid receptors on the Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-sarcosine-induced antinociception

Contribution of the μ opioid receptor and enkephalin to the antinociceptive actions of endomorphin-1 analogs with unnatural amino acid modifications in the spinal cord

Endomorphin analogs containing unnatural amino acids have demonstrated potent analgesic effects in our previous studies. In the present study, the differences in antinociception and the mechanisms thereof for analogs 1-3 administered intracerebroventricularly and intrathecally were explored. All analogs at different routes of administration produced potent analgesia compared to the parent peptide endomorphin-1. Multiple antagonists and antibodies were used to explore the mechanisms of action of these analogs, and it was inferred that analogs 1-3 stimulated the μ opioid receptor to induce antinociception. Moreover, the antibody data suggested that analog 2 may induce the release of immunoreactive [Leu⁵]-enkephaline and [Met⁵]-enkephaline to produce a secondary component of antinociception at the spinal level and analog 3 may stimulate the the release of immunoreactive [Met⁵]-enkephaline at the spinal level. Finally, analogs 2 and 3 produced no acute tolerance in the spinal cord. We hypothesize that the unique characteristics of the endomorphin analogs result from their capacities to stimulate the release of endogenous antinociceptive substances.

Involvement of multiple µ-opioid receptor subtypes on the presynaptic or postsynaptic inhibition of spinal pain transmission

The involvement of the μ-opioid receptor subtypes on the presynaptic or postsynaptic inhibition of spinal pain transmission was characterized in ddY mice using endomorphins. Intrathecal treatment with capsaicin, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) or substance P elicited characteristic nociceptive behaviors that consisted primarily of vigorous biting and/or licking with some scratching. Intrathecal co-administration of endogenous μ-opioid peptide endomorphin-1 or endomorphin-2 resulted in a potent antinociceptive effect against the nociceptive behaviors induced by capsaicin, NMDA or substance P, which was eliminated by i.t. co-administration of the μ-opioid receptor antagonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTOP). The antinociceptive effect of endomorphin-1 was significantly suppressed by i.t.-co-administration of the μ2-opioid receptor antagonist Tyr-D-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH2 (D-Pro2-endomorphin-1) but not the μ1-opioid receptor antagonist Tyr-D-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH2 (D-Pro2-endomorphin-2) on capsaicin- or NMDA-elicited nociceptive behaviors. In contrast, the antinociceptive effect of endomorphin-2 was significantly suppressed by i.t.-co-administration of D-Pro2-endomorphin-2 but not D-Pro2-endomorphin-1 on capsaicin-, NMDA- or substance P-elicited nociceptive behaviors. Interestingly, regarding substance P-elicited nociceptive behaviors, the antinociceptive effect of endomorphin-1 was significantly suppressed by i.t.-co-administration of another μ2-opioid receptor antagonist, Tyr-D-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH2 (D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1), but not D-Pro2-endomorphin-1 or D-Pro2-endomorphin-2. The present results suggest that the multiple μ-opioid receptor subtypes are involved in the presynaptic or postsynaptic inhibition of spinal pain transmission.

Involvement of spinal release of α-neo-endorphin on the antinociceptive effect of TAPA

The antinociceptive effect of i.t.-administered Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-β-Ala (TAPA), an N-terminal tetrapeptide analog of dermorphin, was characterized in ddY mice. In the mouse tail-flick test, TAPA administered i.t. produced a potent antinociception. The antinociception induced by TAPA was significantly attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with the κ-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine, as well as by the μ-opioid receptor antagonist β-funaltrexamine and the μ1-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine. TAPA-induced antinociception was also significantly suppressed by co-administration of the μ1-opioid receptor antagonist Tyr-d-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH2 (d-Pro(2)-endomorphin-2) but not by co-administration of the μ2-opioid receptor antagonists Tyr-d-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH2 (d-Pro(2)-endomorphin-1) and Tyr-d-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH2 (d-Pro(2)-Tyr-W-MIF-1). In CXBK mice whose μ1-opioid receptors were naturally reduced, the antinociceptive effect of TAPA was markedly suppressed compared to the parental strain C57BL/6ByJ mice. Moreover, the antinociception induced by TAPA was significantly attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with antiserum against the endogenous κ-opioid peptide α-neo-endorphin but not antisera against other endogenous opioid peptides. In prodynorphin-deficient mice, the antinociceptive effect of TAPA was significantly reduced compared to wild-type mice. These results suggest that the spinal antinociception induced by TAPA is mediated in part through the release of α-neo-endorphin in the spinal cord via activation of spinal μ1-opioid receptors.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2006

This paper is the 29th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning 30 years of research. It summarizes papers published during 2006 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurological disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

A Tyr-W-MIF-1 analog containing d-Pro2 discriminates among antinociception in mice mediated by different classes of μ-opioid receptors

The antagonism by Tyr-D-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH2 (D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1), a Tyr-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH2 (Tyr-W-MIF-1) analog, of the antinociception induced by the mu-opioid receptor agonists Tyr-W-MIF-1, [D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly(ol)5]-enkephalin (DAMGO), Tyr-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH2 (endomorphin-1), and Tyr-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH2 (endomorphin-2) was studied with the mouse tail-flick test. D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1 (0.5-3 nmol) given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) had no effect on the thermal nociceptive threshold. High doses of D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1 (4-16 nmol) administered i.c.v. produced antinociception with a low intrinsic activity of about 30% of the maximal possible effect. D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1 (0.25-2 nmol) co-administered i.c.v. showed a dose-dependent attenuation of the antinociception induced by Tyr-W-MIF-1 or DAMGO without affecting endomorphin-2-induced antinociception. A 0.5 nmol dose of D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1 significantly attenuated Tyr-W-MIF-1-induced antinociception but not DAMGO- or endomorphin-1-induced antinociception. The highest dose (2 nmol) of D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1 almost completely attenuated Tyr-W-MIF-1-induced antinociception. However, that dose of D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1 significantly but not completely attenuated endomorphin-1 or DAMGO-induced antinociception, whereas the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2 was still not affected by D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1. Pretreatment i.c.v. with various doses of naloxonazine, a mu1-opioid receptor antagonist, attenuated the antinociception induced by Tyr-W-MIF-1, endomorphin-1, endomorphin-2, or DAMGO. Judging from the ID50 values for naloxonazine against the antinociception induced by the mu-opioid receptor agonists, the antinociceptive effect of Tyr-W-MIF-1 is extremely less sensitive to naloxonazine than that of endomorphin-1 or DAMGO. In contrast, endomorphin-2-induced antinociception is extremely sensitive to naloxonazine. The present results clearly suggest that D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1 is a selective antagonist for the mu2-opioid receptor in the mouse brain. D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1 may also discriminate between Tyr-W-MIF-1-induced antinociception and the antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 or DAMGO, which both show a preference for the mu2-opioid receptor in the brain.