Effect of adenosine receptor subtypes stimulation on mixed lymphocyte reaction

CD39/CD73 Dysregulation of Adenosine Metabolism Increases Decidual Natural Killer Cell Cytotoxicity: Implications in Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion

Unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (URSA) is believed to be associated with impaired immunosuppression at the maternal-fetal interface, but the detailed molecular mechanism remains unclear. The ATP-adenosine metabolic pathway regulated by CD39/CD73 has recently been recognized to be important in immunosuppression. This study aimed to investigate the regulation of decidual natural killer (dNK) cells and fetal extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cells by CD39 and CD73 in URSA, as well as the possible regulatory mechanism of CD39/CD73 via the TGF-β-mTOR-HIF-1α pathway using clinical samples and cell models. Fewer CD39⁺ and CD73⁺ cells were found in the URSA decidual and villous tissue, respectively. Inhibition of CD39 on dNK cells transformed the cells to an activated state with increased toxicity and decreased apoptosis, and changed their cytokine secretion, leading to impaired invasion and proliferation of the co-cultured HTR8/SVneo cells. Similarly, inhibition of CD73 on HTR8/SVneo cells decreased the adenosine concentration in the cell culture media, increased the proportion of CD107a⁺ dNK cells, and decreased the invasion and proliferation capabilities of the HTR8/SVneo cells. In addition, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) triggered phosphorylation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and Smad2/Smad3, which subsequently activated hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) to induce the CD73 expression on the HTR8/SVneo cells. In summary, reduced numbers of CD39⁺ and CD73⁺ cells at the maternal-fetal interface, which may be due to downregulated TGF-β-mTOR-HIF-1α pathway, results in reduced ATP-adenosine metabolism and increased dNK cytotoxicity, and potentially contributes to URSA occurrences.

A1 and A2A adenosine receptors play a protective role to reduce prevalence of autoimmunity following tissue damage

Adenosine is a potent modulator that has a tremendous effect on the immune system. Adenosine affects T cell activity, and is necessary in maintaining the T helper/regulatory T cell (Treg ) ratio. Adenosine signalling is also involved in activating neutrophils and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which has been linked to autoimmune disorders. Therefore, adenosine, through its receptors, is extremely important in maintaining homeostasis and involved in the development of autoimmune diseases. In this study, we aim to evaluate the role of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in involvement of autoimmune diseases. We studied adenosine regulation by NETosis in vitro, and used two murine models of autoimmune diseases: type I diabetes mellitus (T1DM) induced by low-dose streptozotocin and pristane-induced systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We have found that A1 R enhances and A2A R suppresses NETosis. In addition, in both models, A1 R-knock-out (KO) mice were predisposed to the development of autoimmunity. In the SLE model in wild-type (WT) mice we observed a decline of A1 R mRNA levels 6 h after pristane injection that was parallel to lymphocyte reduction. Following pristane, 43% of A1 R-KO mice suffered from lupus-like disease while WT mice remained without any sign of disease at 36 weeks. In WT mice, at 10 days A2A R mRNA levels were significantly higher compared to A1R-KO mice. Similar to SLE, in the T1DM model the presence of A1 R and A2A R was protective. Our data suggest that, in autoimmune diseases, the acute elimination of lymphocytes and reduction of DNA release due to NETosis depends upon A1 R desensitization and long-term suppression of A2A R.

Analysis of deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 pathogenesis based on single-cell RNA sequencing of monocytes

Deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2) is a rare autosomal recessive disease caused by loss-of-function variants in the ADA2 gene. DADA2 typically presents in childhood and is characterized by vasculopathy, stroke, inflammation, immunodeficiency, as well as hematologic manifestations. ADA2 protein is predominantly present in stimulated monocytes, dendritic cells, and macrophages. To elucidate molecular mechanisms in DADA2, CD14⁺ monocytes from 14 patients and 6 healthy donors were analyzed using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Monocytes were purified by positive selection based on CD14 expression. Subpopulations were imputed from their transcriptomes. Based on scRNA-seq, monocytes could be classified as classical, intermediate, and nonclassical. Further, we used gene pathway analytics to interpret patterns of up- and down-regulated gene transcription. In DADA2, the frequency of nonclassical monocytes was higher compared with that of healthy donors, and M1 macrophage markers were up-regulated in patients. By comparing gene expression of each monocyte subtype between patients and healthy donors, we identified upregulated immune response pathways, including IFNα/β and IFNγ signaling, in all monocyte subtypes. Distinctively, the TNFR2 noncanonical NF-κB pathway was up-regulated only in nonclassical monocytes. Patients' plasma showed increased IFNγ and TNFα levels. Our results suggest that elevated IFNγ activates cell signaling, leading to differentiation into M1 macrophages from monocytes and release of TNFα. Immune responses and more general response to stimuli pathways were up-regulated in DADA2 monocytes, and protein synthesis pathways were down-regulated, perhaps as stress responses. Our identification of novel aberrant immune pathways has implications for therapeutic approaches in DADA2 (registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT00071045).

Extracellular AMP Suppresses Endotoxemia-Induced Inflammation by Alleviating Neutrophil Activation

Intracellular adenosine monophosphate (AMP) is indispensable for cellular metabolic processes, and it is interconverted to ADP and/or ATP or activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). However, the specific biological function of extracellular AMP has not been identified. We evaluated the effect of extracellular AMP using in vivo and in vitro models of endotoxemia. We found that AMP inhibited inflammation and neutrophil activation in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced endotoxemic mice. The effects of extracellular AMP were abolished by an adenosine 1 receptor (A1R) antagonist but were not influenced by inhibiting the conversion of AMP to adenosine (ADO), indicating that AMP inhibited inflammation by directly activating A1R. In addition, in vitro experiments using LPS-stimulated mouse neutrophils showed that AMP inhibited LPS-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, degranulation, and cytokine production, while the effects were reversed by an A1R antagonist. Further research showed that AMP regulated LPS-stimulated neutrophil functions by inhibiting the p38 MAPK pathway. These findings were also confirmed in primary neutrophils derived from healthy human blood. Moreover, we collected serum samples from septic patients. We found that AMP levels were increased compared with those of healthy volunteers and that AMP levels were negatively correlated with disease severity. Together, these data provide evidence that extracellular AMP acts on A1R to suppress endotoxemia-induced inflammation by inhibiting neutrophil overactivation and that the p38 MAPK signaling pathway is involved.

Pharmacological preconditioning with adenosine A1 receptor agonist induces immunosuppression and improves graft survival in novel allogeneic transplantation models

Adenosine is widely known as a potent modulator of innate and acquired immunity. It is released during transplants, and acts on four subtype receptors. In previous studies, we demonstrated that pharmacological preconditioning (PPC), pre-administration of the selective A1 receptor (A1R) agonist led to A1R desensitization, is followed by upregulation of the adenosine A2A receptor. This immunosuppressive effect resulted in lymphopenia, and it reduced T-cell reactivity. The aim of the current study was to challenge the immunosuppressive effects of A1R-PPC in models of allogeneic grafts. PPC mice were treated by intraperitoneal injection using specific adenosine A1R agonist 24 h and 12 h before starting any procedure. We challenged our method in novel allogeneic muscle and skin grafts models. Mice and grafts were assessed by complete blood counts, MLR from PPC splenocytes, and pathological evaluation. We found a significant reduction in WBC and lymphocyte counts in PPC-treated mice. Two-way MLR with splenocytes from PPC grafted mice showed decreased proliferation and anergy. Histology of PPC allogeneic grafts revealed profoundly less infiltration and even less muscle necrosis compared to vehicle treated allografts. Similar results observed in PPC skin transplantation. To conclude, PPC moderated graft rejection in separate allogeneic challenges, and reduced lymphocytes infiltration and ischemic damage.

Targeting Adenosine Receptor Signaling in Cancer Immunotherapy

The immune system plays a major role in the surveillance and control of malignant cells, with the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) correlating with better patient prognosis in multiple tumor types. The development of ‘checkpoint blockade’ and adoptive cellular therapy has revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment and highlights the potential of utilizing the patient’s own immune system to eradicate cancer. One mechanism of tumor-mediated immunosuppression that has gained attention as a potential therapeutic target is the purinergic signaling axis, whereby the production of the purine nucleoside adenosine in the tumor microenvironment can potently suppress T and NK cell function. The production of extracellular adenosine is mediated by the cell surface ectoenzymes CD73, CD39, and CD38 and therapeutic agents have been developed to target these as well as the downstream adenosine receptors (A₁R, A_2AR, A_2BR, A₃R) to enhance anti-tumor immune responses. This review will discuss the role of adenosine and adenosine receptor signaling in tumor and immune cells with a focus on their cell-specific function and their potential as targets in cancer immunotherapy.

CD56brightCD16- NK Cells Produce Adenosine through a CD38-Mediated Pathway and Act as Regulatory Cells Inhibiting Autologous CD4+ T Cell Proliferation

Recent studies suggested that human CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells may play a role in the regulation of the immune response. Since the mechanism(s) involved have not yet been elucidated, in the present study we have investigated the role of nucleotide-metabolizing enzymes that regulate the extracellular balance of nucleotides/nucleosides and produce the immunosuppressive molecule adenosine (ADO). Peripheral blood CD56(dim)CD16(+) and CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells expressed similar levels of CD38. CD39, CD73, and CD157 expression was higher in CD56(bright)CD16(-) than in CD56(dim)CD16(+) NK cells. CD57 was mostly expressed by CD56(dim)CD16(+) NK cells. CD203a/PC-1 expression was restricted to CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells. CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells produce ADO and inhibit autologous CD4(+) T cell proliferation. Such inhibition was 1) reverted pretreating CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells with a CD38 inhibitor and 2) increased pretreating CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells with a nucleoside transporter inhibitor, which increase extracellular ADO concentration. CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells isolated from the synovial fluid of juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients failed to inhibit autologous CD4(+) T cell proliferation. Such functional impairment could be related to 1) the observed reduced CD38/CD73 expression, 2) a peculiar ADO production kinetics, and 3) a different expression of ADO receptors. In contrast, CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells isolated from inflammatory pleural effusions display a potent regulatory activity. In conclusion, CD56(bright)CD16(-) NK cells act as "regulatory cells" through ADO produced by an ectoenzymes network, with a pivotal role of CD38. This function may be relevant for the modulation of the immune response in physiological and pathological conditions, and it could be impaired during autoimmune/inflammatory diseases.

Purinergic signalling and immune cells

This review article provides a historical perspective on the role of purinergic signalling in the regulation of various subsets of immune cells from early discoveries to current understanding. It is now recognised that adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) and other nucleotides are released from cells following stress or injury. They can act on virtually all subsets of immune cells through a spectrum of P2X ligand-gated ion channels and G protein-coupled P2Y receptors. Furthermore, ATP is rapidly degraded into adenosine by ectonucleotidases such as CD39 and CD73, and adenosine exerts additional regulatory effects through its own receptors. The resulting effect ranges from stimulation to tolerance depending on the amount and time courses of nucleotides released, and the balance between ATP and adenosine. This review identifies the various receptors involved in the different subsets of immune cells and their effects on the function of these cells.

Pharmacological preconditioning with adenosine A(1) receptor agonist suppresses cellular immune response by an A(2A) receptor dependent mechanism

Under stressful conditions such as ischemia, sepsis, and severe trauma, adenosine levels are elevated and protect the tissue by interaction with G coupled receptors. In a model of peritonitis, we previously found that pharmacological preconditioning (PPC) of mice with a selective adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) agonist, 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), induced the A2AR which reduces cytokine secretion and leukocyte recruitment. In our present study we determined whether mice PPC will moderate cellular immune response by the same mechanism. Similar to the effect on inflammation, PPC reduced the response to lymphocyte mitogens and allogeneic MLR response. The inhibitory effect of PPC on the immune response was A1R and A2AR dependent as illustrated by experiments with antagonists of these receptors and mice with knock down (KO) receptors. In MLR with PPC splenocytes we found reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-15, TNF-α) and elevation of IL-10, as well as elevation of regulatory T-cell. Our data indicate that PPC is able to remarkably suppress cellular immune response due to the sensitization A2AR. This effect of PPC sheds light on the protective role of adenosine in ischemic preconditioning and makes this treatment candidate for the prevention of graft rejection.

Regulation of lymphocyte function by adenosine

Adenosine regulates the interaction between lymphocytes and the vasculature, and is important for controlling lymphocyte trafficking in response to tissue injury or infection. Adenosine can blunt the effects of T cell receptor activation primarily by activating adenosine A(2A) receptors and signaling via cyclic AMP and protein kinase A. Protein kinase A reduces proximal T cell receptor signaling by phosphorylation of C-terminal Src kinase, nuclear factor of activated T cells and cyclic AMP response element-binding protein. Protein kinase A activation can either enhance or inhibit the survival of T cells depending on the strength and duration of signaling. Inducible enzymes such as CD73 and CD39 regulate adenosine formation and degradation in vivo. The extravasation of lymphocytes through blood vessels is influenced by A(2A) receptors-mediated suppression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 expression on lymphocytes and diminished production of interferon γ and interferon γ-inducible chemokines that are chemotactic to activated lymphocytes. Adenosine also decreases the barrier function of vascular endothelium by activating A(2B)Rs. In sum, adenosine signaling is influenced by tissue inflammation and injury through induction of receptors and enzymes and has generally inhibitory effects on lymphocyte migration into inflamed tissues due to protein kinase A-mediated effects on adhesion molecules, interferon γ production, and endothelial barrier function.

Adenosine and stroke: maximizing the therapeutic potential of adenosine as a prophylactic and acute neuroprotectant

Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Despite intensive research into the development of treatments that lessen the severity of cerebrovascular injury, no major therapies exist. Though the potential use of adenosine as a neuroprotective agent in the context of stroke has long been realized, there are currently no adenosine-based therapies for the treatment of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. One of the major obstacles to developing adenosine-based therapies for the treatment of stroke is the prevalence of functional adenosine receptors outside the central nervous system. The activities of peripheral immune and vascular endothelial cells are particularly vulnerable to modulation via adenosine receptors. Many of the pathophysiological processes in stroke are a direct result of peripheral immune infiltration into the brain. Ischemic preconditioning, which can be induced by a number of stimuli, has emerged as a promising area of focus in the development of stroke therapeutics. Reprogramming of the brain and immune responses to adenosine signaling may be an underlying principle of tolerance to cerebral ischemia. Insight into the role of adenosine in various preconditioning paradigms may lead to new uses for adenosine as both an acute and prophylactic neuroprotectant.

Adenosine receptors and inflammation

Extracellular adenosine is produced in a coordinated manner from cells following cellular challenge or tissue injury. Once produced, it serves as an autocrine- and paracrine-signaling molecule through its interactions with seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors. These signaling pathways have widespread physiological and pathophysiological functions. Immune cells express adenosine receptors and respond to adenosine or adenosine agonists in diverse manners. Extensive in vitro and in vivo studies have identified potent anti-inflammatory functions for all of the adenosine receptors on many different inflammatory cells and in various inflammatory disease processes. In addition, specific proinflammatory functions have also been ascribed to adenosine receptor activation. The potent effects of adenosine signaling on the regulation of inflammation suggest that targeting specific adenosine receptor activation or inactivation using selective agonists and antagonists could have important therapeutic implications in numerous diseases. This review is designed to summarize the current status of adenosine receptor signaling in various inflammatory cells and in models of inflammation, with an emphasis on the advancement of adenosine-based therapeutics to treat inflammatory disorders.

Regulation of enteric functions by adenosine: pathophysiological and pharmacological implications

The wide distribution of ATP and adenosine receptors as well as enzymes for purine metabolism in different gut regions suggests a complex role for these mediators in the regulation of gastrointestinal functions. Studies in rodents have shown a significant involvement of adenosine in the control of intestinal secretion, motility and sensation, via activation of A1, A2A, A2B or A3 purinergic receptors, as well as the participation of ATP in the regulation of enteric functions, through the recruitment of P2X and P2Y receptors. Increasing interest is being focused on the involvement of ATP and adenosine in the pathophysiology of intestinal disorders, with particular regard for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), intestinal ischemia, post-operative ileus and related dysfunctions, such as gut dysmotility, diarrhoea and abdominal discomfort/pain. Current knowledge suggests that adenosine contributes to the modulation of enteric immune and inflammatory responses, leading to anti-inflammatory actions. There is evidence supporting a role of adenosine in the alterations of enteric motor and secretory activity associated with bowel inflammation. In particular, several studies have highlighted the importance of adenosine in diarrhoea, since this nucleoside participates actively in the cross-talk between immune and epithelial cells in the presence of diarrhoeogenic stimuli. In addition, adenosine exerts complex regulatory actions on pain transmission at peripheral and spinal sites. The present review illustrates current information on the role played by adenosine in the regulation of enteric functions, under normal or pathological conditions, and discusses pharmacological interventions on adenosine pathways as novel therapeutic options for the management of gut disorders and related abdominal symptoms.

Allergen inhalation decreases adenosine receptor expression in sputum and blood of asthma patients

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is a signalling nucleoside that has been proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma. Adenosine is produced in inflammatory environments and acts via adenosine receptors (A(1)R, A(2A)R, A(2B)R, and A(3)R) expressed by a wide variety of cells, resulting in pro- and anti-inflammatory effects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare AR expression in asthma patients and healthy subjects, and to assess the effect of allergen challenge on AR expression of inflammatory cells and on cytokines in peripheral blood and sputum in asthma.

METHODS

Asthma patients underwent an allergen challenge, and blood and induced sputum samples were taken before and 24 h after allergen challenge to study inflammatory cells numbers, AR expression and cytokine production. Blood and sputum were investigated at one time point in healthy subjects. AR expression was measured by flow cytometry (blood) or on cytospins using immunocytochemistry (sputum). Cytokines (luminex, ELISA) and adenosine (HPLC) were measured in sputum supernatant.

RESULTS

The percentage of A(2B)R expressing neutrophils in sputum was lower in asthma patients than in healthy subjects (P = 0.016). Allergen challenge decreased A(1)R and A(2A)R expression on neutrophils and A(1)R expression on T cells in peripheral blood (all P < 0.05). Allergen challenge increased IL-8 levels and eosinophil numbers (P < 0.05), whereas it decreased thymic stromal lymphopoietin levels and the percentage of A(1)R expressing macrophages in induced sputum (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Allergen challenge has a down-regulatory effect on AR expression in asthma, suggesting a contribution of adenosine-related effector mechanisms in the pathophysiology.

Pharmacological modulation of adenosine system: novel options for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are chronic disorders resulting from abnormal and persistent immune responses which lead to severe tissue injury and disturbances in digestive motor/secretory functions. At present, pharmacotherapy represents the cornerstone for the management of IBDs, and recent advances in understanding the immunopathogenesis of intestinal inflammation suggest the adenosine system as an attractive target for development of novel drugs against gut inflammatory disorders. Consistent evidence indicates that adenosine plays a relevant role in the regulation of immune system via interaction with specific cell-membrane G-protein-coupled receptors (A(1), A(2a), A(2b), and A(3)). Moreover, this nucleoside is implicated in the control of enteric neurotransmission and gut motor functions. In the presence of inflammation, the adenosine system acts as a sensible sensor apparatus, which, through dynamic modifications in the expression of ecto-enzymes and purinergic receptors, adapts its metabolism to tissue health status and contributes to the mechanisms deputed to the protection of tissues against inflammatory injuries. In keeping with these concepts, it is becoming increasingly appreciated that drugs targeted on adenosine receptors or enzymes responsible for adenosine catabolism can exert beneficial effects on experimental models of intestinal inflammation. This review aims to discuss the role of adenosine in the regulation of enteric immune responses and gut neuromuscular functions in the presence of inflammation, as well as to highlight the mechanisms through which the pharmacological modulation of adenosine pathways may have potential applications for the therapeutic management of IBDs.