Protective effect of geranylgeranylacetone against loxoprofen sodium-induced small intestinal lesions in rats

Interleukin-13 Mediates Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory-Drug-Induced Small Intestinal Mucosal Injury with Ulceration

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are antipyretics and analgesics, cause gastrointestinal disorders, such as inflammation and ulcers. To prescribe NSAIDs more safely, it is important to clarify the mechanism of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury. However, there is a paucity of studies on small intestinal mucosal damage by NSAIDs, and it is currently unknown whether inflammation and ulceration also occur in the small intestine, and whether mediators are involved in the mechanism of injury. Therefore, in this study, we created an animal model in which small intestinal mucosal injury was induced using NSAIDs (indomethacin; IDM). Focusing on the dynamics of immune regulatory factors related to the injury, we aimed to elucidate the pathophysiological mechanism involved. We analyzed the pathological changes in the small intestine, the expression of immunoregulatory factors (cytokines), and identified cytokine secretion and expression cells from isolated lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMCs). Ulcers were formed in the small intestine by administering IDM. Although the mRNA expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα were decreased on day 7 after IDM administration, IL-13 mRNA levels increased from day 3 after IDM administration and remained high even on day 7. The IL-13 mRNA expression and the secretion of IL-13 were increased in small intestinal LPMCs isolated from the IDM-treated group. In addition, we confirmed that IL-13 was expressed in CD4-positive T cells. These results provided new evidence that IL-13 production from CD4-positive T cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine contributes to NSAID-induced mucosal injury.

Efficacy of Teprenone for Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of teprenone with control or other drugs for reducing the incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events in patients receiving long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Methods: Databases of PubMed, Embase, BioMed Central, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were searched up to November 10th, 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing teprenone with control or other drugs. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used for assessing the certainty of evidence. Results: Seven RCTs were included. Six compared teprenone with control and one with famotidine. Meta-analysis indicated a statistically significant reduced risk of GI ulcers in patients receiving teprenone as compared to control after 12 weeks/3months (RR 0.37 95% CI 0.17, 0.18 I ² = 0% p = 0.01). Pooled data of three open-label studies indicated statistically significant reduction of GI symptoms in patients on teprenone as compared to control at 6 months and 12 months, but not at 3 months. Comparing teprenone with control, our analysis indicated non-significant but a tendency of better reduction in Modified Lanza Score (MLS) with teprenone. The RCT comparing teprenone to famotidine demonstrated better reduction of MLS with famotidine. The certainty of evidence-based on GRADE was deemed to be low. Conclusion: Low-quality evidence indicates a beneficial role of teprenone in preventing GI injuries in patients receiving long-term NSAIDs. Further high-quality RCTs comparing teprenone with placebo as well as other gastroprotective drugs are needed to strengthen current evidence.

Protective effect and mechanism of rebamipide on NSAIDs associated small bowel injury

PURPOSE

To investigate the protective effect and mechanism of rebamipide on NSAIDs associated intestinal injury.

METHODS

Intestinal injury was induced in Sprague Dawley rats by intragastric administration of diclofenac with rebamipide intervention, and LPS and TAK-242 were given intraperitoneally respectively. The expression of TLR4/NF-κB and the related proteins in the intestinal mucosa were detected. 55 patients taking NSAIDs and diagnosed as NSAIDs associated small intestinal injury were recruited as NSAIDs group. Another 55 patients without NSAIDs and no obvious abnormality in the small bowel served as the control group.

RESULTS

The macroscopic and histological scores of the small intestinal mucosa in the rebamipide pretreatment group were significantly lower compared to the diclofenac group (p < 0.01). The expressions of Tollip, ZO-1 and Claudin-1 in the diclofenac group were down-regulated compared with that in the control group, while they increased significantly in the rebamipide pretreatment group (p < 0.01). The expressions of TLR4/NF-κBp65, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α significantly increased in the model group while they were down-regulated in the rebamipide pretreatment group (p < 0.05). Administration of LPS 1 h after diclofenac aggravated small intestinal damage, and increased expression of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α. Administration of rebamipide did not effectively reverse intestinal injury induced by diclofenac and LPS. In contrast, pretreatment with TAK-242 significantly inhibited damage and prevented the increased expression of the cytokines. The expression of TLR4 and NF-κBp65 in the patients with NSAIDs associated intestinal injury was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.01), while the expression of Tollip was decreased (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Rebamipide effectively alleviated intestinal mucosa injury by probably suppressing the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway and the decreasing of ZO-1 and Claudin-1 induced by diclofenac.

Teprenone ameliorates diclofenac-induced small intestinal injury via inhibiting protease activated receptors 1 and 2 activity

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate specific protein expression of injured intestinal mucosa induced by diclofenac, and explore the protective effects of teprenone on it.

METHODS

Intestinal damage of Sprague Dawley male rats was gradually induced by the intragastric administration of diclofenac. After the last drug administration, the intestinal mucosa was taken off with an interval of 24 h, subsequently, its general histological injury and ultrastructure were observed and analysed by a transmission electron microscope. The expression levels of PAR1 and PAR2 protein were detected by immunohistochemistry and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

RESULTS

The Reuter and Chiu scores of small intestinal damage were 5.63 ± 1.30 and 4.25 ± 0.70 respectively in the model group, which could be protected by teprenone (100 mg/kg⋅day) with the degree of 55.7% and 44%. Optical microscopy and transmission electron microscope showed that intestinal mucosa and ultrastructure were severely damaged. Distributed in the cytoplasm or aligned with the nucleus, the expression of PAR1 and PAR2 was significantly upregulated after the administration of diclofenac, while it was relieved after the treatment of teprenone.

CONCLUSION

Our study presents a new view that teprenone might protect NSAIDs-induced (diclofenac) intestinal injury via suppressing the expression of PAR1 and PAR2.

Proton pump inhibitor usage and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-associated small intestinal injury: How to balance risks and benefits

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in the treatment of acid-related diseases and can effectively prevent upper gastrointestinal damage associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, recent studies have shown that PPIs cannot protect from NSAIDs-associated small bowel injury, and may even aggravate intestinal injury by altering the intestinal flora. This article will discuss the risks associated with the combined use of NSAIDs and PPIs, as well as how to balance risks and benefits of PPIs treatment, and provide a brief review of strategies for the prevention of NSAIDs-associated small bowel injury.

Role of Sulforaphane in Protection of Gastrointestinal Tract Against H. pylori and NSAID-Induced Oxidative Stress

BACKGROUND

Sulforaphane (SFN), a phytochemical found in abundance in broccoli sprouts, potently induces a variety of antioxidant enzymes, and thereby protects cells from injury induced by various kinds of oxidative stresses. It has been suggested that both H. pylori infection and intake of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) induce chronic oxidative stress in gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa, thereby causing mucosal injury in the GI tract. Therefore, it would be a reasonable assumption that SFN protects GI mucosa against oxidative injury induced by H. pylori or NSAIDs.

METHODS

We examined the effects of SFN on H. pylori viability in vitro, levels of gastritis in H.pylori-infected mice in vivo, and in H.pylori-infected human subjects. We also examined the effects of SFN on NSAID-induced small intestinal injury in mice.

RESULTS

Our data from the H. pylori infection study clearly demonstrated that SFN inhibited H. pylori viability both in vitro and in vivo, and mitigated H. pylori-induced gastritis in mice and humans. Similarly, our study on NSAID-induced small intestinal injury showed that SFN not only mitigated aspirin-induced injury of small intestinal epithelial cells in vitro, but also ameliorated indomethacin-induced small intestinal injury in mice in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

These data strongly suggest that SFN contributes to the protection of GI mucosa against oxidative injury induced by H. pylori or NSAIDs.

Geranylgeranylacetone protects against small-intestinal injuries induced by diclofenac in patients with rheumatic diseases: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to explore the effect of geranylgeranylacetone on small-intestinal mucosal injuries induced by diclofenac sodium in patients with rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

The patients were randomly divided into two groups in our prospective study. The patients in the geranylgeranylacetone group received diclofenac sodium plus geranylgeranylacetone, and those in the control group received only diclofenac sodium for 12 weeks. We examined small-intestinal mucosal injuries using capsule endoscopy before and after treatment.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between geranylgeranylacetone (n = 21, male: 42.9%; age: 31.0 ± 9.0 year) and control (n = 19, male: 68.4%; age: 31.0 ± 11.0 year) groups in terms of the numbers of patients with petechiae/red spots, denuded areas and mucosal breaks at baseline capsule endoscopy. After treatment, the numbers of patients with denuded areas (χ(2) = 0.000, P = 1.000) and mucosal breaks (χ(2) = 1.750, P = 0.186) did not increase in the geranylgeranylacetone group. However, the numbers of patients with petechiae/red spots (χ(2) = 5.216, P = 0.022), denuded areas (χ(2) = 8.686, P = 0.003) and mucosal breaks (χ(2) = 7.795, P = 0.005) increased after treatment in the control groups. Geranylgeranylacetone improved both the Lewis score (Z = -2.459, P = 0.017) and degree (χ(2) = 5.414, P = 0.020) on capsule endoscopy 12 weeks later.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with rheumatic diseases, geranylgeranylacetone is effective for protecting against small-intestinal mucosal injuries induced by diclofenac sodium.

Rebamipide protects small intestinal mucosal injuries caused by indomethacin by modulating intestinal microbiota and the gene expression in intestinal mucosa in a rat model

The effect of rebamipide, a mucosal protective drug, on small intestinal mucosal injury caused by indomethacin was examined using a rat model. Indomethacin administration (10 mg/kg, p.o.) induced intestinal mucosal injury was accompanied by an increase in the numbers of intestinal bacteria particularly Enterobacteriaceae in the jejunum and ileum. Rebamipide (30 and 100 mg/kg, p.o., given 5 times) was shown to inhibit the indomethacin-induced small intestinal mucosal injury and decreased the number of Enterococcaceae and Enterobacteriaceae in the jejunal mucosa to normal levels. It was also shown that the detection rate of segmented filamentous bacteria was increased by rebamipide. PCR array analysis of genes related to inflammation, oxidative stress and wound healing showed that indomethacin induced upregulation and downregulation of 14 and 3 genes, respectively in the rat jejunal mucosa by more than 5-fold compared to that of normal rats. Rebamipide suppressed the upregulated gene expression of TNFα and Duox2 in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, our study confirmed that disturbance of intestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in indomethacin-induced small intestinal mucosal injury, and suggests that rebamipide could be used as prophylaxis against non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs -induced gastrointestinal mucosal injury, by modulating microbiota and suppressing mucosal inflammation in the small intestine.

Geranylgeranylacetone, a gastromucoprotective drug, protects against NSAID-induced esophageal, gastroduodenal and small intestinal mucosal injury in healthy subjects: A prospective randomized study involving a comparison with famotidine

OBJECTIVE

A treatment strategy to inhibit nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced small intestinal lesions has not yet been established. To clarify whether monotherapy with a gastromucoprotective drug, geranylgeranylacetone (GGA), inhibits NSAID-induced acute mucosal injury of the upper digestive tract and small intestine.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, comparative study. All procedures were performed at Osaka Medical College. The subjects, thirty healthy adult volunteers, were randomly divided into two groups. In the NSAID-GGA group, 75 mg/day of diclofenac sodium and 150 mg/day of GGA were orally administered for two weeks. In the NSAID-FAM group, 75 mg/day of diclofenac sodium and 20 mg/day of famotidine (FAM) were orally administered for two weeks. esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) were performed before and two weeks after drug administration. In addition, we measured fecal occult blood reactions and the fecal calprotectin levels.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the groups in the mean increase in esophageal/gastroduodenal lesions. The mean increases in the scores in the NSAID-FAM group (NSAID-GGA group) of small bowel lesions were as follows: erythema: 1.93 ± 0.67 (0.30 ± 0.60), erosions: 1.13 ± 0.54 (0.38 ± 0.35), ulcers: 0.73 ± 0.33 (0.07 ± 0.07) and edema: 0.53 ± 0.44 (0.07 ± 0.07). The scores for erythema and ulcers were significantly lower in the NSAID-GGA group than in the NSAID-FAM group (p=0.032 and 0.0165, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We compared the prophylactic effects of a mucoprotective drug, GGA, and an H2RA, famotidine, on mucosal injury involving the esophagus to the small intestine related to the two-week oral administration of diclofenac sodium in healthy volunteers. In the upper digestive tract, the prophylactic effects were similar between the two drugs. However, in the small intestine, GGA more markedly inhibited the development of lesions compared to famotidine.

Poor awareness of preventing aspirin-induced gastrointestinal injury with combined protective medications

AIM: To investigate prescribing pattern in low-dose aspirin users and physician awareness of preventing aspirin-induced gastrointestinal (GI) injury with combined protective medications.

METHODS: A retrospective drug utilization study was conducted in the 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. The hospital has 2300 beds and 2.5 million outpatient visits annually. Data mining was performed on all aspirin prescriptions for outpatients and emergency patients admitted in 2011. Concomitant use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine 2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) and mucoprotective drugs (MPs) were analyzed. A defined daily dose (DDD) methodology was applied to each MP. A further investigation was performed in aspirin users on combination use of GI injurious medicines [non-steoid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids and clopidogrel and warfarin] or intestinal protective drugs (misoprostol, rebamipide, teprenone and gefarnate). Data of major bleeding episodes were derived from medical records and adverse drug reaction monitoring records. The annual incidence of major GI bleeding due to low-dose aspirin was estimated for outpatients.

RESULTS: Prescriptions for aspirin users receiving PPIs, H2RA and MPs (n = 1039) accounted for only 3.46% of total aspirin prescriptions (n = 30 015). The ratios of coadministration of aspirin/PPI, aspirin/H2RA, aspirin/MP and aspirin/PPI/MP to the total aspirin prescriptions were 2.82%, 0.12%, 0.40% and 0.12%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in age between patients not receiving any GI protective medications and patients receiving PPIs, H2RA or MPs. The combined medication of aspirin and PPI was used more frequently than that of aspirin and MPs (2.82% vs 0.40%, P < 0.05) and aspirin/H2RA (2.82% vs 0.12%, P < 0.05). The values of DDDs of MPs in descending order were as follows: gefarnate, hydrotalcite > teprenone > sucralfate oral suspension > L-glutamine and sodium gualenate granules > rebamipide > sucralfate chewable tablets. The ratio of MP plus aspirin prescriptions to the total MP prescriptions was as follows: rebamipide (0.47%), teprenone (0.91%), L-glutamine and sodium gualenate granules (0.92%), gefarnate (0.31%), hydrotalcite (1.00%) and sucralfate oral suspension (0.13%). Percentages of prescriptions containing aspirin and intestinal protective drugs among the total aspirin prescriptions were: rebamipide (0.010%), PPI/rebamipide (0.027%), teprenone (0.11%), PPI/teprenone (0.037%), gefarnate (0.017%), and PPI/gefarnate (0.013%). No prescriptions were found containing coadministration of aspirin and other NSAIDs. Among the 3196 prescriptions containing aspirin/clopidogrel, 3088 (96.6%) prescriptions did not contain any GI protective medicines. Of the 389 prescriptions containing aspirin/corticosteroids, 236 (60.7%) contained no GI protective medicines. None of the prescriptions using aspirin/warfarin (n = 22) contained GI protective medicines. Thirty-five patients were admitted to this hospital in 2011 because of acute hemorrhage of upper digestive tract induced by low-dose aspirin. The annual incidence rates of major GI bleeding were estimated at 0.25% for outpatients taking aspirin and 0.5% for outpatients taking aspirin/warfarin, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The prescribing pattern of low-dose aspirin revealed a poor awareness of preventing GI injury with combined protective medications. Actions should be taken to address this issue.