OAT1 and OAT3: targets of drug-drug interaction between entecavir and JBP485

Molecular pharmacokinetic mechanism of JBP485 against aristolochic acid I (AAI) -induced nephrotoxicity

Introduction

In this study, we investigated the protective effect of JBP485 against aristolochic acid I (AAI)-induced nephrotoxicity and explored the pharmacokinetic mechanisms. The effects of JBP485 on AAI-induced cytotoxicity and nephrotoxicity were evaluated in vitro and in vivo, respectively.

Methods

To ascertain the protective effect of JBP485 against AAI-induced nephrotoxicity, we measured levels of urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (CRE), and indoxol sulfate in blood and urine; determined kidney weight-to-body weight ratio; and performed hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Cell viability and Western blotting assays, along with determination of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) contents, were carried out to explore mechanisms underlying the protective effects of JBP485 against AAI-induced nephrotoxicity.

Results

JBP485 treatment attenuated AAI-induced injuries in rat kidney while decreasing the levels of indoxyl sulfate, CRE, and BUN in plasma and increasing those of indoxyl sulfate in urine compared to that in AAI alone-treated group. The co-administration of JBP485 with AAI significantly increased the concentration and AUC of AAI in plasma, while decreasing its cumulative urinary excretion and renal clearance. Moreover, JBP485 reduced the uptake of AAI in kidney slices and human organic anion transporter 1/3 (hOAT1/3)-transfected human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells, suggesting that JBP485 ameliorated AAI-induced nephrotoxicity by reducing renal exposure to AAI via OAT inhibition. Meanwhile, JBP485 modulated the abnormal expressions of Oat1, Oat3, organic cation transporter 2 (Oct2), P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (Mrp2) and multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins 1 (Mate 1) in rat kidney, suggesting that JBP485 improved tubular secretion in AAI-treated rats. Moreover, JBP485 reversed the AAI-induced changes in the expression of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), NAD(P) H: quinone oxidoreductase-1 (NQO1), B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) protein expressions and Bcl-2-like protein 4 (Bax) induced by AAI in rat kidney. JBP485 increased cell viability and reduced intracellular levels of ROS in NRK-52E cells treated with AAI.

Discussion

These results suggested that JBP485 protected against AAI-induced renal oxidative stress. All results indicated that JBP485 protected against AAI-induced nephrotoxicity by reducing renal exposure to AAI and alleviating oxidative stress. Our findings suggested that JBP485 has potential as a renoprotective agent for the prevention of AAI-induced nephrotoxicity.

Effect of changes in metabolic enzymes and transporters on drug metabolism in the context of liver disease: Impact on pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions

Changes in the pharmacokinetic and resulting pharmacodynamic properties of drugs are common in many chronic liver diseases, leading to adverse effects, drug interactions and increased risk of over- or underdosing of medications. Structural and functional hepatic impairment can have major effects on drug metabolism and transport. This review summarizes research on the functional changes in phase I and II metabolic enzymes and in transport proteins in patients with metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and cirrhosis, providing a clinical perspective on how these changes affect drug uptake and metabolism. Generally, a decrease in expression and/or activity of many enzymes of the cytochrome P450 family (e.g. CYP2E1 and CYP3A4), and of influx and efflux transporters (e.g. organic anion-transporting polypeptide [OATP]1B1, OATP2B1, OAT2 and bile salt export pump), has been recently documented in patients with liver disease. Decreased enzyme levels often correlate with increased severity of chronic liver disease. In subjects with hepatic impairment, there is potential for strong alterations of drug pharmacokinetics due to reduced absorption, increased volume of distribution, metabolism and extraction. Due to the altered pharmacokinetics, specific drug-drug interactions are also a potential issue to consider in patients with liver disease. Given the huge burden of liver disease in western societies, there is a need to improve awareness among all healthcare professionals and patients with liver disease to ensure appropriate drug prescriptions.

Research Methods and New Advances in Drug-Drug Interactions Mediated by Renal Transporters

The kidney is critical in the human body's excretion of drugs and their metabolites. Renal transporters participate in actively secreting substances from the proximal tubular cells and reabsorbing them in the distal renal tubules. They can affect the clearance rates (CLr) of drugs and their metabolites, eventually influence the clinical efficiency and side effects of drugs, and may produce drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of clinical significance. Renal transporters and renal transporter-mediated DDIs have also been studied by many researchers. In this article, the main types of in vitro research models used for the study of renal transporter-mediated DDIs are membrane-based assays, cell-based assays, and the renal slice uptake model. In vivo research models include animal experiments, gene knockout animal models, positron emission tomography (PET) technology, and studies on human beings. In addition, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE), ex vivo kidney perfusion (EVKP) models, and, more recently, biomarker methods and in silico models are included. This article reviews the traditional research methods of renal transporter-mediated DDIs, updates the recent progress in the development of the methods, and then classifies and summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Through the sorting work conducted in this paper, it will be convenient for researchers at different learning stages to choose the best method for their own research based on their own subject's situation when they are going to study DDIs mediated by renal transporters.

OAT3 Participates in Drug-Drug Interaction between Bentysrepinine and Entecavir through Interactions with M8-A Metabolite of Bentysrepinine-In Rats and Humans In Vitro

Bentysrepinine (Y101) is a novel phenylalanine dipeptide for the treatment of hepatitis B virus. Renal excretion played an important role in the elimination of Y101 and its metabolites, M8 and M9, in healthy Chinese subjects, although the molecular mechanisms of renal excretion and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) remain unclear. The present study aimed to determine the organic anion transporters (OATs) involved in the renal disposition of Y101 and to predict the potential DDI between Y101 and entecavir, the first-line agent against HBV and a substrate of OAT1/3. Pharmacokinetic studies and uptake assays using rat kidney slices, as well as hOAT1/3-HEK293 cells, were performed to evaluate potential DDI. The co-administration of probenecid (an inhibitor of OATs) significantly increased the plasma concentrations and area under the plasma concentration-time curves of M8 and M9 but not Y101, while reduced renal clearance and the cumulative urinary excretion of M8 were observed in rats. The time course of Y101 and M8 uptake via rat kidney slices was temperature-dependent. Moreover, the uptake of M8 was inhibited significantly by probenecid and benzylpenicillin, but not by p-aminohippurate or tetraethyl ammonium. M8 was found to be a substrate of hOAT3, but Y101 is not a substrate of either hOAT1 or hOAT3. Additionally, the entecavir inhibited the uptake of M8 in the hOAT3-transfected cells and rat kidney slices in vitro. Interestingly, no significant changes were observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters of Y101, M8 or entecavir, regardless of intravenous or oral co-administration of Y101 and entecavir in rats. In conclusion, M8 is a substrate of OAT3 in rats and humans. Furthermore, M8 also mediates the DDI between Y101 and entecavir in vitro, mediated by OAT3. We speculate that it would be safe to use Y101 with entecavir in clinical practice. Our results provide useful information with which to predict the DDIs between Y101 and other drugs that act as substrates of OAT3.

A Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interactions Study between Entecavir and Hydronidone, a Potential Novel Antifibrotic Small Molecule, in Healthy Male Volunteers

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic fibrosis is an inevitable process of hepatic sclerosis, malignancy, and insufficiency, and hydronidone is an innovative antifibrosis drug. This study focus on the pharmacokinetic interaction of hydronidone and entecavir in healthy Chinese male subjects.

METHODS

An open-label, three-period, multiple-dosage, self-controlled clinical trial was executed in 12 healthy male subjects. In period 1, the subjects took hydronidone 60 mg, q8h, for 7 days. In period 2, they were given entecavir 0.5 mg once daily for 9 days. Then, hydronidone and entecavir were given in combination for 6 days (days 20-26). Blood samples were taken up to 24 h post-dosing, while pre-dose blood samples were drawn on days 7, 19, and 26.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC)_{0-t_ss} of entecavir slightly increased from 15.56 ± 2.67 to 16.17 ± 2.77 ng h/ml with coadministration with hydronidone, while the other pharmacokinetic parameters of hydronidone and entecavir were comparable between monotherapy and combination therapy. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) [90% confidence intervals (CIs)] of C_{max_ss}, AUC_{0-t_ss}, and AUC_{0-∞_ss} of entecavir after coadministration compared with entecavir alone were 107.21% (97.04-118.45%), 103.85% (100.94-106.83%), and 110.81% (97.19-126.33%), respectively. And the GMRs and 90% CIs of C_max,ss, AUC_{0-t_ss}, and AUC_{0-∞_ss} for combination therapy compared with the hydronidone monotherapy group were 102.72% (84.21-125.29%), 106.52% (97.06-116.90%), and 108.86% (96.42-122.89%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no drug-drug interaction between hydronidone and entecavir in healthy male volunteers. However, multiple doses of hydronidone have a risk with increasing exposure to entecavir in vivo, which needs to be further clarified.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200059683 (retrospectively registered).

JBP485, A Dual Inhibitor of Organic Anion Transporters (OATs) and Renal Dehydropeptidase-I (DHP-I), Protects Against Imipenem-Induced Nephrotoxicity

Imipenem (IMP) possesses a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity; however, nephrotoxicity limits its clinical application in patients with renal insufficiency. In our previous studies, a dipeptide, JBP485, a dipeptide with the chemical structure cyclo-trans-4-L-hydroxyprolyl-L-serine, was found to attenuate drug-induced kidney injury. The current study aimed to explore whether JBP485 could relieve IMP-induced kidney injury and clarify the potential molecular pharmacokinetic mechanism. The effects of JBP485 on IMP nephrotoxicity were evaluated in rabbits and human kidney 2 (HK-2) cells. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) mediated by organic anion transporters (OATs) and dehydropeptidase-I (DHP-I) were explored through pharmacokinetic studies in rats, metabolism assays in the kidney, and uptake studies in OAT-over-expressing cells. The results revealed that JBP485 significantly ameliorated IMP-induced nephrotoxicity in rabbits. Further, incubation of HK-2 cells with JBP485 or cilastatin markedly improved the cell survival rate, inhibited apoptosis and attenuated mitochondrial damage by improving the stability of IMP and reducing its intracellular accumulation. This suggests that DHP-I and OATs might be involved in the protective effect of JBP485. Furthermore, coadministration with JBP485 significantly increased the IMP's plasma concentration as well as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), while decreasing IMP renal clearance and cumulative urinary excretion. Moreover, JBP485 reduced IMP uptake in kidney slices and OAT1/3-human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells. At the same time, the metabolism of IMP by DHP-I was inhibited by JBP485 with an IC50 value of 12.15 ± 1.22 μM. Finally, the molecular docking assay revealed a direct interaction between JBP485 and OAT1/3 or DHP-I. In conclusion, JBP485 protected against IMP nephrotoxicity in rabbits and HK-2 cells by improving IMP stability and reducing its intracellular accumulation via simultaneous inhibition of renal OATs and DHP-I. JBP485 is a promising renoprotective agent and could serve as an effective supplement to reduce IMP-induced adverse renal reactions in the clinical setting.

Identification of Drug Transporter Genomic Variants and Inhibitors That Protect Against Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Multiple pharmacogenomic studies have identified the synonymous genomic variant rs7853758 (G > A, L461L) and the intronic variant rs885004 in SLC28A3 (solute carrier family 28 member 3) as statistically associated with a lower incidence of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. However, the true causal variant(s), the cardioprotective mechanism of this locus, the role of SLC28A3 and other solute carrier (SLC) transporters in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, and the suitability of SLC transporters as targets for cardioprotective drugs has not been investigated.

METHODS

Six well-phenotyped, doxorubicin-treated pediatric patients from the original association study cohort were recruited again, and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes were generated. Patient-specific doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC) was then characterized using assays of cell viability, activated caspase 3/7, and doxorubicin uptake. The role of SLC28A3 in DIC was then queried using overexpression and knockout of SLC28A3 in isogenic human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes using a CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated protein 9). Fine-mapping of the SLC28A3 locus was then completed after SLC28A3 resequencing and an extended in silico haplotype and functional analysis. Genome editing of the potential causal variant was done using cytosine base editor. SLC28A3-AS1 overexpression was done using a lentiviral plasmid-based transduction and was validated using stranded RNA-sequencing after ribosomal RNA depletion. Drug screening was done using the Prestwick Chemical Library (n = 1200), followed by in vivo validation in mice. The effect of desipramine on doxorubicin cytotoxicity was also investigated in 8 cancer cell lines.

RESULTS

Here, using the most commonly used anthracycline, doxorubicin, we demonstrate that patient-derived cardiomyocytes recapitulate the cardioprotective effect of the SLC28A3 locus and that SLC28A3 expression influences the severity of DIC. Using Nanopore-based fine-mapping and base editing, we identify a novel cardioprotective single nucleotide polymorphism, rs11140490, in the SLC28A3 locus; its effect is exerted via regulation of an antisense long noncoding RNA (SLC28A3-AS1) that overlaps with SLC28A3. Using high-throughput drug screening in patient-derived cardiomyocytes and whole organism validation in mice, we identify the SLC competitive inhibitor desipramine as protective against DIC.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates the power of the human induced pluripotent stem cell model to take a single nucleotide polymorphism from a statistical association through to drug discovery, providing human cell-tested data for clinical trials to attenuate DIC.

Effects of Fuzheng Huayu recipe on entecavir pharmacokinetics in normal and dimethylnitrosamine-induced hepatic fibrosis rats

Context: Fuzheng Huayu recipe (FZHY) combined with entecavir (ETV) is used to treat the cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection.Objective: To investigate the effect of FZHY on ETV pharmacokinetics under different conditions.Materials and methods: A model of liver fibrosis was created by intraperitoneal injection of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN; 10 μg/kg) for 4 weeks in Wistar rats. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine the blood concentration of ETV. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of ETV (0.9 mg/kg) were investigated after co-administration with FZHY (0.55 g/kg) at certain time intervals in normal and model rats.Results: The analytical method for ETV was validated at 0.5-50 μg/L with a correlation coefficient = 0.9996, lower limit of quantitation of 0.5 μg/L and mean accuracy of 104.18 ± 9.46%. Compared with the ETV-N group, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the EF-2 group did not change significantly, but that of the EF-0 group decreased in C_max to 27.38 μg/L, in AUC_0-t from 323.84 to 236.67 μg/h/L, and a delay in T_max from 0.75 to 6.00 h; that of the EF-0 group presented a decrease in C_max of 61.92%, delay in t_1/2 of 2.45 h and delay in T_max of 2.92 h. The t_1/2e and V_d/F of ETV were increased significantly to 8.01 h and 24.38 L/kg in the ETV-M group.Conclusions: The effects of FZHY on ETV pharmacokinetics were diminished with an increase of interval time. The best time to administer both drugs is >2 h apart.

Pregnancy Impacts Entecavir Pharmacokinetics but Does Not Alter Its Renal Excretion

Entecavir (ETV) is a first-line antiviral drug against the hepatitis B virus. This study was designed to investigate whether ETV pharmacokinetics changes during pregnancy and the underlying mechanism. The results showed that ETV exposure in plasma was higher in pregnant rats than in nonpregnant rats, whereas the exposure after delivery was recovered to that in nonpregnant rats. Because 70% of orally dosed ETV is eliminated by kidney, the effects of estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4), 2 important hormones during pregnancy, on ETV-related renal transporters were investigated. Our results revealed that the activities of the ETV-related renal transporters hOAT1, hOAT3, hMATE1, and hMATE2-K were clearly inhibited by E2 and P4, resulting in reduced ETV accumulation in transporter-transfected cell models. However, the cumulative urinary excretion of ETV in pregnant rats exhibited no significant difference compared to nonpregnant rats, although the endogenous creatinine clearance in pregnant rats was 1.5-fold that of nonpregnant rats. In conclusion, ETV plasma exposure is increased during pregnancy, but ETV renal excretion displays no significant alteration. This may be because, during pregnancy, increased glomerular ETV filtration compensated for the decrease in renal tubular ETV secretion that occurs by E2- and P4-mediated inhibition of related transporters.

Overview of organic anion transporters and organic anion transporter polypeptides and their roles in the liver

Organic anion transporters (OATs) and organic anion transporter polypeptides (OATPs) are classified within two SLC superfamilies, namely, the SLC22A superfamily and the SLCO superfamily (formerly the SLC21A family), respectively. They are expressed in many tissues, such as the liver and kidney, and mediate the absorption and excretion of many endogenous and exogenous substances, including various drugs. Most are composed of 12 transmembrane polypeptide chains with the C-terminus and the N-terminus located in the cell cytoplasm. OATs and OATPs are abundantly expressed in the liver, where they mainly promote the uptake of various endogenous substrates such as bile acids and various exogenous drugs such as antifibrotic and anticancer drugs. However, differences in the locations of glycosylation sites, phosphorylation sites, and amino acids in the OAT and OATP structures lead to different substrates being transported to the liver, which ultimately results in their different roles in the liver. To date, few articles have addressed these aspects of OAT and OATP structures, and we study further the similarities and differences in their structures, tissue distribution, substrates, and roles in liver diseases.

Current trends in drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics (PK) is the study of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) processes of a drug. Understanding PK properties is essential for drug development and precision medication. In this review we provided an overview of recent research on PK with focus on the following aspects: (1) an update on drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters in the determination of PK, as well as advances in xenobiotic receptors and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the modulation of PK, providing new understanding of the transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms that result in inter-individual variations in pharmacotherapy; (2) current status and trends in assessing drug-drug interactions, especially interactions between drugs and herbs, between drugs and therapeutic biologics, and microbiota-mediated interactions; (3) advances in understanding the effects of diseases on PK, particularly changes in metabolizing enzymes and transporters with disease progression; (4) trends in mathematical modeling including physiologically-based PK modeling and novel animal models such as CRISPR/Cas9-based animal models for DMPK studies; (5) emerging non-classical xenobiotic metabolic pathways and the involvement of novel metabolic enzymes, especially non-P450s. Existing challenges and perspectives on future directions are discussed, and may stimulate the development of new research models, technologies, and strategies towards the development of better drugs and improved clinical practice.

Renal organic anion transporters in drug-drug interactions and diseases

The kidney plays a vital role in maintaining systemic homeostasis. Active tubular secretion and reabsorption, which are mainly mediated by transporters, is an efficient mechanism for retaining glucose, amino acids, and other nutrients and for the clearance of endogenous waste products and xenobiotics. These substances are recognized by uptake transporters located in the basolateral and apical membranes of renal proximal tubule cells and are extracted from plasma and urine. Organic anion transporters (OATs) belong to the solute carrier (SLC) 22 superfamily and facilitate organic anions across the plasma membranes of renal proximal tubule cells. OATs are responsible for the transmembrane transport of anionic and zwitterionic organic molecules, including endogenous substances and many drugs. The alteration in OAT expression and function caused by diseases, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) or other issues can thus change the renal disposition of substrates, induce the accumulation of toxic metabolites, and lead to unexpected clinically outcome. This review summarizes the recent information regarding the expression, regulation, and substrate spectrum of OATs and discusses the roles of OATs in diseases and DDIs. These findings will enables us to have a better understanding of the related disease therapy and the potential risk of DDIs mediated by OATs.

Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions

Transporters in proximal renal tubules contribute to the disposition of numerous drugs. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms of tubular secretion have been progressively elucidated during the past decades. Organic anions tend to be secreted by the transport proteins OAT1, OAT3 and OATP4C1 on the basolateral side of tubular cells, and multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 2, MRP4, OATP1A2 and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) on the apical side. Organic cations are secreted by organic cation transporter (OCT) 2 on the basolateral side, and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) proteins MATE1, MATE2/2-K, P-glycoprotein, organic cation and carnitine transporter (OCTN) 1 and OCTN2 on the apical side. Significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) may affect any of these transporters, altering the clearance and, consequently, the efficacy and/or toxicity of substrate drugs. Interactions at the level of basolateral transporters typically decrease the clearance of the victim drug, causing higher systemic exposure. Interactions at the apical level can also lower drug clearance, but may be associated with higher renal toxicity, due to intracellular accumulation. Whereas the importance of glomerular filtration in drug disposition is largely appreciated among clinicians, DDIs involving renal transporters are less well recognized. This review summarizes current knowledge on the roles, quantitative importance and clinical relevance of these transporters in drug therapy. It proposes an approach based on substrate-inhibitor associations for predicting potential tubular-based DDIs and preventing their adverse consequences. We provide a comprehensive list of known drug interactions with renally-expressed transporters. While many of these interactions have limited clinical consequences, some involving high-risk drugs (e.g. methotrexate) definitely deserve the attention of prescribers.

Glycyrrhetic acid, but not glycyrrhizic acid, strengthened entecavir activity by promoting its subcellular distribution in the liver via efflux inhibition

Entecavir (ETV) is a superior nucleoside analogue used to treat hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Although its advantages over other agents include low viral resistance and the elicitation of a sharp decrease in HBV DNA, adverse effects such as hepatic steatosis, hepatic damage and lactic acidosis have also been reported. Glycyrrhizin has long been used as hepato-protective medicine. The clinical combination of ETV plus glycyrrhizin in China displays better therapeutic effects and lower rates of liver damage. However, there is little evidence explaining the probable synergistic mechanism that exists between these two drugs from a pharmacokinetics view. Here, alterations in the plasma pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, subcellular distribution, and in vitro and in vivo antiviral activity of ETV after combination with glycyrrhizic acid (GL) were analysed to determine the synergistic mechanisms of these two drugs. Specific efflux transporter membrane vesicles were also used to elucidate their interactions. The primary active GL metabolite, glycyrrhetic acid (GA), did not affect the plasma pharmacokinetics of ETV but promoted its accumulation in hepatocytes, increasing its distribution in the cytoplasm and nucleus and augmenting the antiviral efficiency of ETV. These synergistic actions were primarily due to the inhibitory effect of GA on MRP4 and BCRP, which transport ETV out of hepatocytes. In conclusion, GA interacted with ETV at cellular and subcellular levels in the liver through MRP4 and BCRP inhibition, which enhanced the antiviral activity of ETV. Our results partially explain the synergistic mechanism of ETV and GL from a pharmacokinetics view, providing more data to support the use of these compounds together in clinical HBV treatment.

Multiple SLC and ABC Transporters Contribute to the Placental Transfer of Entecavir

Entecavir (ETV), a nucleoside analog with high efficacy against hepatitis B virus, is recommended as a first-line antiviral drug for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. However, scant information is available on the use of ETV in pregnancy. To better understand the safety of ETV in pregnant women, we aimed to demonstrate whether ETV could permeate placental barrier and the underlying mechanism. Our study showed that small amount of ETV could permeate across placenta in mice. ETV accumulation in activated or nonactivated BeWo cells (treated with or without forskolin) was sharply reduced in the presence of 100 µM of adenosine, cytidine, and in Na+ free medium, indicating that nucleoside transporters possibly mediate the uptake of ETV. Furthermore, ETV was proved to be a substrate of concentrative nucleoside transporter (CNT) 2 and CNT3, of organic cation transporter (OCT) 3, and of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) using transfected cells expressing respective transporters. The inhibition of ETV uptake in primary human trophoblast cells further confirmed that equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) 1/2, CNT2/3, OCT3, and organic cation/carnitine transporter (OCTN) 2 might be involved in ETV transfer in human placenta. Therefore, ETV uptake from maternal circulation to trophoblast cells was possibly transported by CNT2/3, ENT1/2, and OCTN2, whereas ETV efflux from trophoblast cells to fetal circulation was mediated by OCT3, and efflux from trophoblast cells to maternal circulation might be mediated by BCRP, multidrug resistance-associated protein 2, and P-glycoprotein. The information obtained in the present study may provide a basis for the use of ETV in pregnancy.

Multiple Drug Transporters Are Involved in Renal Secretion of Entecavir

Entecavir (ETV) is a first-line antiviral agent for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Renal excretion is the major elimination path of ETV, in which tubular secretion plays the key role. However, the secretion mechanism has not been clarified. We speculated that renal transporters mediated the secretion of ETV. Therefore, the aim of our study was to elucidate which transporters contribute to the renal disposition of ETV. Our results revealed that ETV (50 μM) remarkably reduced the accumulation of probe substrates in MDCK cells stably expressing human multidrug and toxin efflux extrusion proteins (hMATE1/2-K), organic cation transporter 2 (hOCT2), and carnitine/organic cation transporters (hOCTNs) and increased the substrate accumulation in cells transfected with multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (hMRP2) or multidrug resistance protein 1 (hMDR1). Moreover, ETV was proved to be a substrate of the above-described transporters. In transwell studies, the transport of ETV in MDCK-hOCT2-hMATE1 showed a distinct directionality from BL (hOCT2) to AP (hMATE1), and the cellular accumulation of ETV in cells expressing hMATE1 was dramatically lower than that of the mock-treated cells. The accumulation of ETV in mouse primary renal tubular cells was obviously affected by inhibitors of organic anion transporter 1/3 (Oat1/3), Oct2, Octn1/2, and Mrp2. Therefore, the renal uptake of ETV is likely mediated by OAT1/3 and OCT2 while the efflux is mediated by MATEs, MDR1, and MRP2, and OCTN1/2 may participate in both renal secretion and reabsorption.

Entecavir Interacts with Influx Transporters hOAT1, hCNT2, hCNT3, but Not with hOCT2: The Potential for Renal Transporter-Mediated Cytotoxicity and Drug-Drug Interactions

Entecavir (ETV) is one of the most potent agents for the treatment of the hepatitis B viral infection. The drug is principally eliminated by the kidney. The goal of this study was to investigate the potential of ETV to interact in vitro with the renal SLC transporters hOAT1, hOCT2, hCNT2 and hCNT3. Potential drug–drug interactions of ETV at the renal transporters with antiviral drugs known to be excreted by the kidney (adefovir, tenofovir, cidofovir) as well as transporter-dependent cytotoxicity were also examined. Interactions with the selected transporters along with cytotoxicity were studied in several transiently transfected cellular models using specific substrates and inhibitors. ETV was found to be both a substrate and inhibitor of hOAT1 (IC₅₀ = 175.3 μM), hCNT2 (IC₅₀ = 241.9 μM) and hCNT3 (IC₅₀ = 278.4 μM) transporters, although it interacted with the transporters with relatively low affinities. ETV inhibited the cellular uptake of adefovir, tenofovir, and cidofovir by hOAT1; however, effective inhibition was shown at ETV concentrations exceeding therapeutic levels. In comparison with adefovir, tenofovir, and cidofovir, ETV displayed no transporter-mediated cytotoxicity in cells transfected with hOAT1, hCNT2, and hCNT3. No significant interaction of ETV with hOCT2 was detected. The study demonstrates interactions of ETV with several human renal transporters. For the first time, an interaction of ETV with the hCNTs was proved. We show that the potency of ETV to cause nephrotoxicity and/or clinically significant drug-drug interactions related to the tested transporters is considerably lower than that of adefovir, tenofovir, and cidofovir.

UHPLC-MS/MS method with automated on-line solid phase extraction for the quantification of entecavir in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of HBV+ patients

To date five nucleoside analogs are used in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: among these, entecavir is the most used. Nevertheless a few information about its distribution in tissues is currently known. Since the determination of entecavir disposition in the hepatocytes is impracticable because of its invasiveness, the quantification in an "easier-to-obtain" cellular model could be a good choice. In this work, we developed and validated an ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay based on an automated on-line SPE, to quantify entecavir concentrations in peripheral blood mononucleated cells (PBMCs), in both its phosphorylated and un-phosphorylated forms. To achieve this, each PBMC isolate was divided in two aliquots, one was treated with acid phosphatase to convert entecavir phosphorylated metabolites into free form, the other one was not-treated. Standards and quality controls were prepared in PBMCs, isolated from healthy donors, and underwent the same process. 20 μL of the resulting solutions were injected in the on-line SPE system. Thymidine was used as internal standard. Calibration curves fitted a linear model for entecavir levels in a range from 0.039 ng to 5 ng (mean r(2)=0.998). Accuracy, intra-day and inter-day precision of the method fitted FDA guidelines recommendations. Moreover, recovery was consistent and matrix effect resulted low and reproducible. We tested this method by monitoring entecavir concentrations in PBMCs from 28HBV mono-infected patients, confirming its reliability and suitability for the evaluation of intracellular entecavir penetration.

Decreased liver distribution of entecavir is related to down-regulation of Oat2/Oct1 and up-regulation of Mrp1/2/3/5 in rat liver fibrosis

AIMS

We aimed to elucidate whether entecavir was taken-up into liver by transporters and clarify the possible molecular mechanisms of changes in the distribution of entecavir in rat liver fibrosis.

METHODS

Thioacetamide (TAA) was applied to induce rat liver fibrosis. Samples of liver uptake index (LUI) study and uptake of entecavir in isolated rat hepatocytes were determined by LC-MS/MS. qRT-PCR and western blotting were used to examine the expression of transporters in rat liver.

RESULTS

The uptake of entecavir in hepatocytes was significantly higher at 37 °C compared to 4 °C. Furthermore, TEA and PAH could inhibit significantly the uptake of entecavir by the hepatocytes. It indicated that Oat2 and Oct1 were contributed to uptake of entecavir. Compared with control group, LUI and the uptake of entecavir, PAH and TEA in hepatocytes were significantly reduced in liver fibrosis group. Further study indicated that entecavir Vmax in liver fibrosis group was significantly decreased while the Km was not changed. These results indicated that transport capacity TAA treated isolated rat liver hepatocytes were reduced. Oat2 and Oct1 expressions were down-regulated and Mrp1/2/3/5 mRNA expressions were up-regulated in liver fibrosis group.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes of these transporters were contributed to decrease liver distribution of entecavir.

Nucleoside transporter proteins as biomarkers of drug responsiveness and drug targets

Nucleoside and nucleobase analogs are currently used in the treatment of solid tumors, lymphoproliferative diseases, viral infections such as hepatitis and AIDS, and some inflammatory diseases such as Crohn. Two gene families are implicated in the uptake of nucleosides and nucleoside analogs into cells, SCL28 and SLC29. The former encodes hCNT1, hCNT2, and hCNT3 proteins. They translocate nucleosides in a Na⁺ coupled manner with high affinity and some substrate selectivity, being hCNT1 and hCNT2 pyrimidine- and purine-preferring, respectively, and hCNT3 a broad selectivity transporter. SLC29 genes encode four members, being hENT1 and hENT2 the only two which are unequivocally implicated in the translocation of nucleosides and nucleobases (the latter mostly via hENT2) at the cell plasma membrane. Some nucleoside-derived drugs can also interact with and be translocated by members of the SLC22 gene family, particularly hOCT and hOAT proteins. Inter-individual differences in transporter function and perhaps, more importantly, altered expression associated with the disease itself might modulate the transporter profile of target cells, thereby determining drug bioavailability and action. Drug transporter pharmacology has been periodically reviewed. Thus, with this contribution we aim at providing a state-of-the-art overview of the clinical evidence generated so far supporting the concept that these membrane proteins can indeed be biomarkers suitable for diagnosis and/or prognosis. Last but not least, some of these transporter proteins can also be envisaged as drug targets, as long as they can show “transceptor” functions, in some cases related to their role as modulators of extracellular adenosine levels, thereby providing a functional link between P1 receptors and transporters.

PEPT1- and OAT1/3-mediated drug-drug interactions between bestatin and cefixime in vivo and in vitro in rats, and in vitro in human

The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the transporter-mediated pharmacokinetics mechanism of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between bestatin and cefixime. The plasma concentrations and bioavailabilities of bestatin and cefixime were decreased after oral co-administration in rats. The uptake in rat everted intestinal sacs of bestatin and cefixime were dramatically declined after co-administration of the two drugs. Bestatin and cefixime can mutually competitively inhibit the uptake by hPEPT1-HeLa cells. The plasma concentrations of bestatin and cefixime were increased; however, the cumulative biliary excretion had no significant change, and the cumulative urinary excretion and renal clearance of the two drugs in rats decreased after intravenous coadministration. Moreover, decreased uptake of the two drugs was observed in human kidney slices, rat kidney slices and hOAT1/hOAT3-transfected HEK293 cells when bestatin and cefixime were coadministered. The accumulation of bestatin and cefixime in kidney slices can be inhibited by p-aminohippurate, benzylpenicillin and probenecid, but not by tetraethyl ammonium. The results suggest that intestinal absorption and renal excretion of bestatin and cefixime can be inhibited when the two drugs were co-administered in rats. The pharmacokinetic mechanism indicates that the DDIs between bestatin and cefixime are mainly mediated by Pept1 and Oat1/3 in rats. PEPT1 and OAT1/3 are the target transporters of DDIs between bestatin and cefixime in human kidney slices and human transfected cells, proposing possible drug-drug interaction in humans.

Inhibitory effect of valsartan on the intestinal absorption and renal excretion of bestatin in rats

Peptidomimetic drugs have favorable bioavailability owing to H(+)/peptide transporter 1 (PEPT1) located in the intestine. Sartans are commonly used and likely coadministered with peptidomimetic drugs in the clinic; however, in vivo interactions between sartans and peptidomimetic drugs have not been systemically understood. Herein, the effect and mechanism of sartans on the intestinal absorption and renal excretion of the dipeptide-like drug bestatin were investigated. Following oral combination with valsartan, the plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of bestatin in rats decreased significantly. Bestatin absorption in rat-everted intestinal sacs was dramatically reduced by valsartan. Sartans exhibited concentration-dependent inhibition on the uptake of bestatin in human PEPT1 (hPEPT1)-HeLa cells. The cumulative urinary excretion and renal clearance of the two drugs in rats decreased after intravenous coadministration. Moreover, decreased uptake of the two drugs was observed in rats' kidney slices and human organic anion transporter (hOAT)1/hOAT3-transfected cells when coadministered. The results suggest that the intestinal absorption and renal excretion of bestatin in rats were inhibited by coadministered valsartan. Interestingly, the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of valsartan for PEPT1 and OAT1/3 were comparable to the theoretically estimated local drug concentration and the clinical unbound concentration, respectively, proposing possible drug-drug interaction in humans via PEPT1 and OAT1/3, which should be paid particular attention when bestatin and valsartan are coadministrated clinically.