Frequency and causes of discontinuation of methotrexate in a cohort of Egyptian patients

Low prevalence of methotrexate intolerance in rheumatoid arthritis: a South African study

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate (MTX) is the first line therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and despite its widespread use, there is very little information about MTX intolerance in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of MTX intolerance and other reasons for stopping MTX in RA in South Africa.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all RA patients seen at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Hospital in Durban from 2009 to 2019 was undertaken. We included patients who received MTX for at least three months. All patients received folic acid supplements. Patients who discontinued MTX were categorized as having either MTX related toxicity or other reasons.

RESULTS

A total of 695 patients were identified with a female to male ratio of 7:1. The mean age was 57.9 (± 13.3) years, and median duration of MTX use was 67.0 (39.0-106.0) months. Most of the patients were African Blacks (61.2%), and Indians (32.8%). There were 83 (11.9%) patients who stopped MTX, and it was successfully reintroduced in 25 of them. Thus, 58 (8.3%) patients discontinued therapy, 33 (4.7%) due to intolerance and 25 (3.6%) due to factors other than adverse effects. The commonest causes of MTX intolerance were respiratory, gastrointestinal and haematological. The other reasons for discontinuation included co-morbidities and pregnancy related concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

The low prevalence of MTX intolerance in a multiethnic population in this single centre study, confirms the value of MTX as anchor therapy, especially in resource constrained settings. Key Points • We report a low and similar prevalence of methotrexate intolerance in a large population of African Blacks and Indians with RA in sub-Saharan Africa. • Even though there was heterogeneity among other studies, our review indicates that MTX was tolerated better in our patients compared to patients in Europe and the United States of America.

Understanding the Dual Challenge: Adverse Drug Reactions and Adherence in Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the real-world occurrence of various adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and assess medication adherence among patients using disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Additionally, the study sought to evaluate the degree of methotrexate intolerance among these patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital and involved 100 adult patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were currently undergoing treatment with methotrexate. The study systematically recorded all adverse drug reactions reported by the patients as well as those identified through laboratory tests. Medication adherence was measured using the Compliance Questionnaire Rheumatology (CQR5) and both intentional and non-intentional non-adherence questionnaires. The methotrexate intolerance was assessed using the Methotrexate Intolerance Severity Score (MISS).

RESULTS

Out of the total 74 reported ADRs, gastrointestinal were the most common, accounting for 62 (76.53%) of cases, followed by hematological problems at 13 (16.07%), with other types of ADRs comprising the remaining. Despite the prevalence of gastrointestinal ADRs, the study found high levels of medication adherence among the patients. Additionally, the methotrexate intolerance was relatively low, which may be attributed to the use of folic acid supplementation by all participants.

CONCLUSION

Gastrointestinal adverse drug reactions were the most frequently observed side effects in this study. Despite these reactions, patients demonstrated a high level of adherence to methotrexate therapy. The factors contributing to this adherence- such as patient counseling, disease knowledge, or the duration of the disease- merit further investigation to understand their impact on treatment outcomes.

Protective effect of benfotiamine on methotrexate induced gastric damage in rats

Methotrexate (MTX) is widely used for treating cancers and inflammatory diseases; it is a potential anti-metabolite and folate antagonist. We investigated potential protective effects of benfotiamine on MTX damage. We used a rat model of MTX induced gastric injury to assess changes in gastric histopathology, oxidative stress and visfatin levels due to MTX treatment. Rats were divided into four groups: an untreated control group, an MTX group treated with a single dose of MTX, a benfotiamine group treated with benfotiamine daily for two weeks, and a benfotiamine + MTX group treated with a single dose of MTX followed by benfotiamine daily for two weeks. Total tissue antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS) and visfatin levels were measured at the end of the experiment. At the end of the experiment, we investigated both visfatin expression and the histopathology of gastric tissues. The mean visfatin level was lower in the MTX group than in the benfotiamine group. The mean tissue TOS levels were higher in MTX group than in the control, benfotiamine or benfotiamine + MTX groups. Significant gastric gland dilation, and erosion and loss of mucosa were found on the gastric surface in the MTX group compared to the control group. The dilation, erosion and mucosal loss were decreased significantly in the benfotiamine + MTX group compared to the MTX group. Compared to the control group, visfatin immunoreactivity was reduced significantly in the MTX group. Decreased visfatin levels appear to play a role in the mechanism of gastric damage. Benfotiamine may be useful for preventing MTX induced gastric injuries.

Efficacy and safety of monotherapy with sirukumab compared with adalimumab monotherapy in biologic-naïve patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (SIRROUND-H): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multinational, 52-week, phase 3 study

OBJECTIVE

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 study compared monotherapy with sirukumab, an anti-interleukin-6 cytokine monoclonal antibody, with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Biologic-naïve patients with active RA who were inadequate responders or were intolerant to, or inappropriate for, methotrexate were randomised to subcutaneous sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks (n=187), sirukumab 50 mg every 4 weeks (n=186) or adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks (n=186). Primary endpoints at week 24 were change from baseline in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response; these endpoints were tested in sequential order. This study is registered at EudraCT (number: 2013-001417-32) and ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT02019472).

RESULTS

Significantly greater improvements from baseline in mean (SD) DAS28 (ESR) were observed at week 24 with sirukumab 100 mg every 2 weeks (-2.96 (1.580)) versus adalimumab 40 mg every 2 weeks (-2.19 (1.437); P<0.001). Sirukumab 50 mg every 4 weeks also showed significantly greater improvement from baseline at week 24 in DAS28 (ESR) (-2.58 (1.524)) compared with adalimumab (P=0.013). The ACR50 response rates with the 100 mg (35.3%) and 50 mg (26.9%) doses of sirukumab were comparable to that with adalimumab (31.7%) at week 24. The safety profile of sirukumab was consistent with that observed with anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibodies. A dose-related effect on the incidence of injection-site reactions was observed with sirukumab.

CONCLUSION

Sirukumab monotherapy showed greater improvements in DAS28 (ESR), but similar ACR50 response rates, versus adalimumab monotherapy.

Comparison of comorbidities of the Egyptian rheumatoid arthritis patients to the global cohort of the COMORA study: a post-hoc analysis

The aims of this study are to present the results of Egyptian RA patients included in COMORA cohort and compare it to general COMORA cohort, concerning prevalence of comorbidities, and level of application of recommendations related to detection/prevention of comorbidities. Three-hundred eight Egyptian RA patients included in the cross-sectional, observational, multi-center, international study "COMORA", were compared to the total number of 3612 RA patients. The CRF of COMORA was used in all patients. CRF collects demographic and disease characteristics, comorbidities, risk factors, and compliance with recommendations regarding management of comorbidities. Data were analyzed according to COMORA protocol. Egyptian RA patients were significantly younger, had more active disease, and were more functionally disabled. They showed more frequent use of NSAIDs, methotrexate and steroids and significantly lower use of bDMARDs when compared to non-Egyptians. Egyptian patients had the highest ever HCV prevalence, while depression, hypertension, smoking and dyslipidemia were less prevalent in Egyptians. Prevalence of malignancy risk factors was highly deficient among Egyptians; primarily due to lack of screening. Further, following recommendations for monitoring comorbidities is significantly deficient among Egyptian patients. Egyptian patients had more active disease and more functional impairment than the rest of the COMORA cohort; with lower use of bDMARDs, that is possibly related to the economic situation. Also, there is a clear gap in screening and monitoring comorbidities. Awareness among Egyptian healthcare providers (and possibly similar third-world countries) to detect and manage RA-related comorbidities is required.