1
|
Alzubaidi S, Wallace A, Naidu S, Knuttinen MG, Kriegshauser SJ, Oklu R, Al-Ogaili M, Patel I. Single-arm prospective study comparing ablation zone volume between time zero and 24 h after microwave ablation of liver tumors. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3136-3142. [PMID: 38400983 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04185-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Percutaneous thermal ablation is an effective treatment for primary and metastatic liver tumors and is a recommended local therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Reported evidence shows an increase in the ablation zone volume over the first 24-h post-liver ablation. This report compares ablation zone volumes immediately at the completion (T = 0) of 26 microwave ablations of liver tumors to 24-h post-procedure (T = 24) volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS 20 patients, 13 (65%) males, underwent a total of 26 hepatic microwave ablations (MWA) under ultrasound guidance. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) or MRI was performed immediately and another CECT 24 h post operatively. Evaluation of the ablation zone and comparison of the two post-operative scans were done using BioTrace software. The expansion of ablation zones on post-op CECTs was matched point by point per direction. The distance between each 2 points was measured and grouped by distance. The incidence of each specific distance was then converted into a percentage, first for each case separately, then for all cases altogether. Data were tested by a matched paired one-sided t test. RESULTS The median lesion diameter was 1.5 cm (range 0.5-3.3) with 16 (62%) HCC cases and 9 hepatic metastases (4 neuroendocrine carcinoma, 4 colorectal carcinomas, 1 breast carcinoma, 1 pancreatic cancer). The data show a consistent volume expansion greater than 30% (p = 7.7e-5) 24-h post-ablation, where the median expansion is 57%. Distances between T = 0 and T = 24 equal to 3-7 mm occur in over 35% of the cases. CONCLUSION The ablation zone expansion at 24-h post-op was not uniform. The final ablation zone is difficult to predict at the time of the procedure. The awareness of the ablation zone expansion is important when treating near-critical structures, managing the heat sink effect, and preserving liver parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadeer Alzubaidi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Alex Wallace
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Sailendra Naidu
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Martha-Garcia Knuttinen
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Scott J Kriegshauser
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Rahmi Oklu
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Mustafa Al-Ogaili
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| | - Indravadan Patel
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lyshchik A, Fetzer DT, Kono Y, Wilson SR, Dietrich CF, Clevert DA, Meloni MF, Jang HJ, Kim TK, Lee JM, Minami Y, Kudo M, Piscaglia F, Atzen S. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Contrast-Enhanced US Nonradiation Treatment Response Assessment Version 2024. Radiology 2024; 311:e232369. [PMID: 38805727 PMCID: PMC11140523 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
The American College of Radiology Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) standardizes the imaging technique, reporting lexicon, disease categorization, and management for patients with or at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). LI-RADS encompasses HCC surveillance with US; HCC diagnosis with CT, MRI, or contrast-enhanced US (CEUS); and treatment response assessment (TRA) with CT or MRI. LI-RADS was recently expanded to include CEUS TRA after nonradiation locoregional therapy or surgical resection. This report provides an overview of LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024, including a lexicon of imaging findings, techniques, and imaging criteria for posttreatment tumor viability assessment. LI-RADS CEUS Nonradiation TRA v2024 takes into consideration differences in the CEUS appearance of viable tumor and posttreatment changes within and in close proximity to a treated lesion. Due to the high sensitivity of CEUS to vascular flow, posttreatment reactive changes commonly manifest as areas of abnormal perilesional enhancement without washout, especially in the first 3 months after treatment. To improve the accuracy of CEUS for nonradiation TRA, different diagnostic criteria are used to evaluate tumor viability within and outside of the treated lesion margin. Broader criteria for intralesional enhancement increase sensitivity for tumor viability detection. Stricter criteria for perilesional enhancement limit miscategorization of posttreatment reactive changes as viable tumor. Finally, the TRA algorithm reconciles intralesional and perilesional tumor viability assessment and assigns a single LI-RADS treatment response (LR-TR) category: LR-TR nonviable, LR-TR equivocal, or LR-TR viable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrej Lyshchik
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - David T. Fetzer
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Yuko Kono
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Stephanie R. Wilson
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Christoph F. Dietrich
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Dirk A. Clevert
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Maria Franca Meloni
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Hyun-Jung Jang
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Tae Kyoung Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Jeong Min Lee
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Yasunori Minami
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| | - Sarah Atzen
- From the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University
Hospital, 132 S 10th St, 763G Main Bldg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 (A.L.);
Department of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (D.T.F.);
Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San
Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Calgary,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada (S.R.W.); Department of General Internal Medicine,
Hirslanden Klinik Beau-Site, Hirslanden Salem-Spital, and Hirslanden Klinik
Permanence, Bern, Switzerland (C.F.D.); Interdisciplinary Ultrasound Center,
Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University
of Munich, Munich, Germany (D.A.C.); Department of Interventional Ultrasound,
Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy (M.F.M.); Joint Department of Medical Imaging,
University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (H.J.J., T.K.K.); Department of
Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University
Hospital, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of Radiology, Seoul National
University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (J.M.L.); Department of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka,
Japan (Y.M., M.K.); Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, Division of
Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna,
Italy (F.P.); and Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of
Bologna, Bologna, Italy (F.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Del Cura JL, Del Cura G, Zabala R, Korta I. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to guide diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures. RADIOLOGIA 2022; 64:277-288. [PMID: 35676061 DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2021.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Although not necessary for the vast majority of ultrasound-guided procedures, intravenous contrast agents can be useful for procedures aimed at lesions that require contrast enhancement to be seen on ultrasonography. Using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to guide procedures has two drawbacks: first, because enhancement from ultrasound contrast agents is short lived, it is often necessary to plan several injections; second, because the needle is poorly seen on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, a dual image display format is necessary. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can be used for planning and monitoring diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, for guiding the procedures, and for follow-up. Using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography enables better results in both types of procedures; moreover, it can be used within cavities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Del Cura
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
| | - G Del Cura
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - R Zabala
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - I Korta
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Faccia M, Garcovich M, Ainora ME, Riccardi L, Pompili M, Gasbarrini A, Zocco MA. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Monitoring Treatment Response in Different Stages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:481. [PMID: 35158749 PMCID: PMC8833342 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The capacity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to detect microvessel perfusion has received much attention in cancer imaging since it can be used to evaluate the enhancement patterns of the lesions during all vascular phases in real time, with higher temporal resolution as compared other imaging modalities. A rich body of literature has demonstrated the potential usefulness of CEUS in the assessment of HCC in response to both locoregional and systemic therapies. It is useful to evaluate the efficacy of ablation immediately after treatment to provide guidance for the retreatment of residual unablated tumors. In patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), CEUS showed a high degree of concordance with computed tomography and magnetic resonance for the differentiation of responders from non-responders. Dynamic CEUS (D-CEUS) has emerged as a promising tool for the depicting changes in tumor perfusion during anti-angiogenetic treatment that can be associated with tumor response and clinical outcome. This article provides a general review of the current literature regarding the usefulness of CEUS in monitoring HCC response to therapy, highlighting the role of the procedure in different stages of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariella Faccia
- Department of Internal Medicine, SS Annunziata Hospital Sulmona, 67039 Sulmona, Italy;
| | - Matteo Garcovich
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.G.); (M.E.A.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.)
| | - Maria Elena Ainora
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.G.); (M.E.A.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.)
| | - Laura Riccardi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.G.); (M.E.A.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.)
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.G.); (M.E.A.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.)
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.G.); (M.E.A.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.)
| | - Maria Assunta Zocco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University of Rome, 00168 Rome, Italy; (M.G.); (M.E.A.); (L.R.); (M.P.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lan Y, Li N, Song Q, Zhang MB, Luo YK, Zhang Y. Correlation and agreement between superb micro-vascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for assessing radiofrequency ablation treatment of thyroid nodules: a preliminary study. BMC Med Imaging 2021; 21:175. [PMID: 34809604 PMCID: PMC8609811 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-021-00697-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the correlation and agreement between superb micro-vascular imaging (SMI) mode and the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) mode for the ablative completeness and the volumes of ablation lesions to determine the clinical application value of SMI in follow-up after radiofrequency ablation.
Methods From April 2020 to June 2020, two radiologists used SMI and CEUS mode to measure the volume of the ablation lesion. We use intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), scatter plots and Bland–Altman plots to evaluate the correlation and agreement of the two techniques. In addition, intra- and inter-observer reliability in volume measurement of ablation lesions with SMI mode was assessed. Results SMI mode and CEUS mode have good agreement in the evaluation of ablative completeness. The ICC was 0.876 and 0.928 of reader A and reader B between SMI mode and CEUS mode in terms of ablation lesions volume measurement. There was a strong correlation between the two modes in both reader A and reader B (rA = 0.808; rB = 0.882). The ICC was 0.836 for the inter-observer reliability of SMI technique. The scatter plot showed a good linear relation (r = 0.715). In the Bland–Altman plot, 4.35% (1/23) of the points was outside the 95% limits of agreement. The ICC was 0.965 for the intra-observer reliability of SMI technique, the scatter plot also showed a strong linear correlation (r = 0.965). In the Bland–Altman plot, 8.70% (2/23) of the points was outside the 95% limits of agreement. Conclusions SMI and CEUS have good agreement and correlation in the ablation volume measurement. SMI technology is expected to be applied as an alternative to CEUS in the clinical follow-up of ablation lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Lan
- Department of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.,School of Medicine, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China.,Department of Ultrasound, The People's Hospital of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
| | - Nan Li
- Department of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Song
- Department of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Bo Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| | - Yu-Kun Luo
- Department of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China. .,School of Medicine, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, China.
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hai Y, Savsani E, Chong W, Eisenbrey J, Lyshchik A. Meta-analysis and systematic review of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the treatment response after locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:5162-5179. [PMID: 34410432 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03248-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a useful tool to assess treatment response after percutaneous ablation or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the usefulness of CEUS in identifying residual tumor after locoregional therapy. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases were searched from their inception until March 8, 2021, for diagnostic test accuracy studies comparing CEUS to a reference standard for identifying residual tumors after locoregional therapy of HCC. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were obtained using a bivariate random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying the studies based on study design, type of locoregional therapy, CEUS criteria for residual tumor, timing of CEUS follow up, and type of standard reference. RESULTS Two reviewers independently evaluated 1479 publications. After full-text review, 142 studies were found to be relevant, and 43 publications (50 cohorts) were finally included. The overall sensitivity of CEUS in detection of residual disease estimated from the bivariate random effects model was 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.89). Similarly, the overall specificity was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96). The diagnostic accuracy was 93.5%. The DOR was 70.1 (95% CI 62.2-148), and the AUROC was 0.95. Importantly, subgroup analysis showed no apparent differences in the diagnostic performance between locoregional therapy (TACE vs. ablation) and criteria used to define residual enhancement, timing of performing CEUS, study design, or type of reference standard. CONCLUSION CEUS is a highly accurate method to identify HCC residual tumor after TACE or percutaneous ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Hai
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, 763G Main Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Esika Savsani
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, 763G Main Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Weelic Chong
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 100, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St, Suite 727, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - John Eisenbrey
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, 763G Main Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, 132 South 10th Street, 763G Main Building, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pohlman RM, Hinshaw JL, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lubner MG, Wells SA, Lee FT, Alexander ML, Wergin KL, Varghese T. Differential Imaging of Liver Tumors before and after Microwave Ablation with Electrode Displacement Elastography. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2021; 47:2138-2156. [PMID: 34011451 PMCID: PMC8243838 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Liver cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths; however, primary treatment options such as surgical resection and liver transplant may not be viable for many patients. Minimally invasive image-guided microwave ablation (MWA) provides a locally effective treatment option for these patients with an impact comparable to that of surgery for both cancer-specific and overall survival. MWA efficacy is correlated with accurate image guidance; however, conventional modalities such as B-mode ultrasound and computed tomography have limitations. Alternatively, ultrasound elastography has been used to demarcate post-ablation zones, yet has limitations for pre-ablation visualization because of variability in strain contrast between cancer types. This study attempted to characterize both pre-ablation tumors and post-ablation zones using electrode displacement elastography (EDE) for 13 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastasis. Typically, MWA ablation margins of 0.5-1.0 cm are desired, which are strongly correlated with treatment efficacy. Our results revealed an average estimated ablation margin inner quartile range of 0.54-1.21 cm with a median value of 0.84 cm. These treatment margins lie within or above the targeted ablative margin, indicating the potential to use EDE for differentiating index tumors and ablated zones during clinical ablations. We also obtained a high correlation between corresponding segmented cross-sectional areas from contrast-enhanced computed tomography, the current clinical gold standard, when compared with EDE strain images, with r2 values of 0.97 and 0.98 for pre- and post-ablation regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Pohlman
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
| | - James L Hinshaw
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Timothy J Ziemlewicz
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Meghan G Lubner
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Shane A Wells
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Fred T Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Marci L Alexander
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Kelly L Wergin
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Tomy Varghese
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yan L, Luo Y. Prediction of nodule regrowth after radiofrequency ablation of benign thyroid nodules. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 38:11-12. [PMID: 33400887 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1867243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yan
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yukun Luo
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yan L, Luo Y, Xie F, Zhang M, Xiao J. Residual vital ratio: predicting regrowth after radiofrequency ablation for benign thyroid nodules. Int J Hyperthermia 2021; 37:1139-1148. [PMID: 32996790 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1825835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine a novel quantitative index, residual vital ratio(RVR) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) with conventional Ultrasound(US), to early predict nodule regrowth after radiofrequency ablation (RFA)for benign thyroid nodules. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated 186 patients with 206 benign thyroid nodules underwent RFA. Patients were followed at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and every 12 months thereafter by conventional US, CEUS and clinical evaluation. RVR was defined as the initial ratio of residual vital volume to the total volume calculated by CEUS and conventional US at the first follow-up period after RFA. The relationship between RVR and regrowth was investigated. RESULTS The mean volume of thyroid nodules was 10.09 ± 12.90 ml (range 0.40-71.39 ml), which decreased significantly to 2.33 ± 4.65 ml (range 0-36.75 ml) (p < .001) after a mean follow-up time of 22.50 ± 13.29 months (range 6-68 months) with a mean VRR as 85.26 ± 15.02% (range 32.23-100%). The overall incidence of regrowth was 12.62% (26/206) and the mean timing of regrowth was 20.77 ± 12.03 months (range 6-48 months). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that RVR (OR = 1.050, 95%CI 1.025-1.075), initial volume(OR = 1.033, 95%CI 1.000-1.066), location close to critical structures (OR = 5.967, 95%CI 1.898-18.760) and vascularity (OR = 2.216, 95%CI 1.185-4.143) were independent factors associated with regrowth. According to receiver-operating characteristic curve, the area under curve for RVR to regrowth was 0.819 (95% CI 0.740-0.897, p < .001) with the optimal cutoff value of 44.5% (sensitivity 80.8%, specificity 74.7%). CONCLUSION RVR was not only an independent factor but also an early quantitative predictor for regrowth. If RVR was larger than 44.5%, the nodule tended to regrowth in the follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Yan
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Health Management Center, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yukun Luo
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Fang Xie
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mingbo Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Xiao
- Department of Ultrasound, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meloni MF, Francica G, Chiang J, Coltorti A, Danzi R, Laeseke PF. Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Ablation Therapy of HCC: Planning, Guiding, and Assessing Treatment Response. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2021; 40:879-894. [PMID: 32936485 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) plays an important role in the management of patients treated with ablation therapies, in the diagnostic, therapeutic and monitoring phases. Compared to contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, CEUS presents several advantages in imaging HCC, including real time imaging capability, high sensitivity for tumor vascularity, absence of renal toxicity, no ionizing radiation, repeatability of injections, good compliance by the patient and low cost. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the role of CEUS in the management of the patients with HCC treated with ablation therapies and describe how in our protocol CEUS is integrated with the other imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Franca Meloni
- Radiology Department, University of Pavia, Italy and Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Giampiero Francica
- Interventional Ultrasound Unit, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | - Jason Chiang
- Department of Radiology, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Andrea Coltorti
- Department of Radiology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Danzi
- Department of Radiology, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | - Paul F Laeseke
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Imaging and Image-Guided Thermal Ablation for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer Liver Disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 26:124-128. [PMID: 32205536 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer affects more than 1 million people worldwide, and half of this population develops liver metastases. Image-guided thermal ablation is an acceptable local therapy for the management of oligometastatic colorectal cancer liver disease, in patients who are noneligible for surgery, or present with recurrence after hepatectomy. Continuous technological evolutions, understanding of tumor variability through disease biology and genetics, and optimization of ablation parameters with ablation margin assessment have allowed patients with resectable small-volume disease to be treated by thermal ablation with curative intent. The growing role of imaging and image guidance in thermal ablation for patient selection, procedure planning, tumor targeting, and assessment of technical success is discussed in this article.
Collapse
|
12
|
Del Cura JL, Del Cura G, Zabala R, Korta I. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to guide diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures. RADIOLOGIA 2021; 64:S0033-8338(21)00067-9. [PMID: 33773773 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Although not necessary for the vast majority of ultrasound-guided procedures, intravenous contrast agents can be useful for procedures aimed at lesions that require contrast enhancement to be seen on ultrasonography. Using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to guide procedures has two drawbacks: first, because enhancement from ultrasound contrast agents is short lived, it is often necessary to plan several injections; second, because the needle is poorly seen on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, a dual image display format is necessary. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can be used for planning and monitoring diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, for guiding the procedures, and for follow-up. Using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography enables better results in both types of procedures; moreover, it can be used within cavities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Del Cura
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San Sebastián, España.
| | - G Del Cura
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao, Bizkaia, España
| | - R Zabala
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Bizkaia, España
| | - I Korta
- Servicio de Radiodiagnóstico, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Bizkaia, España
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dietrich CF, Nolsøe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V, Chammas MC, Chaubal N, Choi BI, Clevert DA, Cui X, Dong Y, D'Onofrio M, Fowlkes JB, Gilja OH, Huang P, Ignee A, Jenssen C, Kono Y, Kudo M, Lassau N, Lee WJ, Lee JY, Liang P, Lim A, Lyshchik A, Meloni MF, Correas JM, Minami Y, Moriyasu F, Nicolau C, Piscaglia F, Saftoiu A, Sidhu PS, Sporea I, Torzilli G, Xie X, Zheng R. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver - Update 2020 - WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN (STUTTGART, GERMANY : 1980) 2020; 41:562-585. [PMID: 32707595 DOI: 10.1055/a-1177-0530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB). The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications.The 2012 guideline requires updating as previously the differences of the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval as well as the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective.These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCA) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCA in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph F Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland
- Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitätsklinik Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christian Pállson Nolsøe
- Center for Surgical Ultrasound, Dep of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES). University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard G Barr
- Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA and Southwoods Imaging, Youngstown, Ohio, USA
| | - Annalisa Berzigotti
- Hepatology, University Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, DBMR, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter N Burns
- Dept Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Imaging Research, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Uos Ecografia Internistico-chirurgica, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche, Anatomo-Patologiche, Policlinico Umberto I, Univ. Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Chammas
- Institute of Radiology, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nitin Chaubal
- Thane Ultrasound Centre, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Byung Ihn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, Department of Radiology, University of Munich-Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - Xinwu Cui
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan China
| | - Yi Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mirko D'Onofrio
- Department of Radiology, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - J Brian Fowlkes
- Basic Radiological Sciences Division, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Odd Helge Gilja
- National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Pintong Huang
- Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Andre Ignee
- Department of Internal Medicine 2, Caritas Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Department of Internal Medicine, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| | - Yuko Kono
- Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- Imaging Department. Gustave Roussy and BIOMAPS. Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Won Jae Lee
- Department of Radiology and Center For Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Departments of Health and Science and Technology and Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Young Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Adrian Lim
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College London and Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, London United Kingdom
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | | | - Jean Michel Correas
- Service de Radiologie Adultes, Hôpital Necker, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Yasunori Minami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fuminori Moriyasu
- Center for Cancer Ablation Therapy, Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Carlos Nicolau
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Unit of Internal Medicine, Dept of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania
| | - Paul S Sidhu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, King's College London, London
| | - Ioan Sporea
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", Timisoara, Romania
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary & General Surgery, Humanitas University & Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy
| | - Xiaoyan Xie
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rongqin Zheng
- Department of Ultrasound, The 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dietrich CF, Nolsøe CP, Barr RG, Berzigotti A, Burns PN, Cantisani V, Chammas MC, Chaubal N, Choi BI, Clevert DA, Cui X, Dong Y, D'Onofrio M, Fowlkes JB, Gilja OH, Huang P, Ignee A, Jenssen C, Kono Y, Kudo M, Lassau N, Lee WJ, Lee JY, Liang P, Lim A, Lyshchik A, Meloni MF, Correas JM, Minami Y, Moriyasu F, Nicolau C, Piscaglia F, Saftoiu A, Sidhu PS, Sporea I, Torzilli G, Xie X, Zheng R. Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver-Update 2020 WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY 2020; 46:2579-2604. [PMID: 32713788 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 267] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, first initiated in 2004 by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The previous updated editions of the guidelines reflected changes in the available contrast agents and updated the guidelines not only for hepatic but also for non-hepatic applications. The 2012 guideline requires updating as, previously, the differences in the contrast agents were not precisely described and the differences in contrast phases as well as handling were not clearly indicated. In addition, more evidence has been published for all contrast agents. The update also reflects the most recent developments in contrast agents, including U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval and the extensive Asian experience, to produce a truly international perspective. These guidelines and recommendations provide general advice on the use of ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) and are intended to create standard protocols for the use and administration of UCAs in liver applications on an international basis to improve the management of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph F Dietrich
- Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem und Permanence, Bern, Switzerland; Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitätsklinik, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Christian Pállson Nolsøe
- Center for Surgical Ultrasound, Dep of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES). University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Richard G Barr
- Department of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA; Southwoods Imaging, Youngstown, Ohio, USA
| | - Annalisa Berzigotti
- Hepatology, University Clinic for Visceral Surgery and Medicine, DBMR, Inselspital, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter N Burns
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Imaging Research, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Uos Ecografia Internistico-chirurgica, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche, Anatomo-Patologiche, Policlinico Umberto I, Univ. Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Chammas
- Institute of Radiology, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Nitin Chaubal
- Thane Ultrasound Centre, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Byung Ihn Choi
- Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dirk-André Clevert
- Interdisciplinary Ultrasound-Center, Department of Radiology, University of Munich-Grosshadern Campus, Munich, Germany
| | - Xinwu Cui
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yi Dong
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mirko D'Onofrio
- Department of Radiology, G. B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - J Brian Fowlkes
- Basic Radiological Sciences Division, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Odd Helge Gilja
- National Centre for Ultrasound in Gastroenterology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Pintong Huang
- Department of Ultrasound in Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Andre Ignee
- Department of Internal Medicine 2, Caritas Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Christian Jenssen
- Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, Department of Internal Medicine, Strausberg/Wriezen, Germany
| | - Yuko Kono
- Departments of Medicine and Radiology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- Imaging Department, Gustave Roussy and BIOMAPS, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Won Jae Lee
- Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Departments of Health and Science and Technology and Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Science and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Young Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Adrian Lim
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College London and Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrej Lyshchik
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Jean Michel Correas
- Service de Radiologie Adultes, Hôpital Necker, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Yasunori Minami
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Fuminori Moriyasu
- Center for Cancer Ablation Therapy, Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Carlos Nicolau
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clinic. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Unit of Internal Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Adrian Saftoiu
- Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Romania
| | - Paul S Sidhu
- Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ioan Sporea
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes", Timisoara, Romania
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary & General Surgery, Humanitas University & Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Xiaoyan Xie
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rongqin Zheng
- Department of Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-Guided Interventions-The New Sheriff in Town?: A Case-Based Review of Problem Solving With Ultrasound Contrast. Ultrasound Q 2020; 36:91-101. [PMID: 32515928 DOI: 10.1097/ruq.0000000000000455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Ultrasound (US)-guided intervention is a well-established medical procedure and offers advantages such as real-time guidance, portability, reduced cost, shortened procedure time compared with computed tomography, and lack of ionizing radiation. Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are a useful adjunct to US-guided procedures. The addition of microbubble UCAs during US-guided interventions can assist with biopsy planning and lesion selection, aid in identification of target lesions, and direct the biopsy toward viable tissue. Ultrasound contrast agents have been in use outside of the United States for many years and have been used off label at select institutions across the United States before the Food and Drug Administration approval of Lumason (Bracco Diagnostics) for liver lesion evaluation in April 2016. After Food and Drug Administration approval, the use of UCAs has expanded rapidly, and UCAs are being used for a variety of clinical applications. Ultrasound contrast agents have been shown to be safe, and there is no renal toxicity. In this article, we will discuss the indications and techniques for using contrast-enhanced ultrasound during US-guided interventions, and we will present case examples where contrast-enhanced ultrasound added value.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation is a widely acceptable local therapy for patients with colorectal liver metastases who are noneligible for surgery or present with recurrence after hepatectomy. The increasing knowledge of factors that affect oncologic outcomes has allowed selected patients with resectable small volume colorectal liver metastases to be treated by thermal ablation with curative intent. The continuous technological evolutions in imaging and image-guidance and the wide implementation of microwave ablation that overcomes most of the limitations of radiofrequency ablation have contributed to this paradigm shift. The importance of patient selection, ablation margin evaluation, and confirmation of complete tumor ablation (A0) are discussed in this article.
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang M, Tufano RP, Russell JO, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Qiao Z, Luo Y. Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Surgery for Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Results of Over 5 Years' Follow-Up. Thyroid 2020; 30:408-417. [PMID: 31910107 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2019.0147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) typically carries an excellent prognosis regardless of the treatment option pursued. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for thyroid disease has been utilized for benign lesions and in patients who are poor surgical candidates for thyroid cancers with compression symptoms, but the efficacy and limitations of RFA as first-line therapy for PTMC has not been described in adequate detail. The purpose of our study was to investigate RFA versus thyroidectomy in terms of efficacy, oncologic outcomes, quality of life, complications, and costs over a 5-year period of follow-up. Methods: From January 2013 to November 2013, 174 consecutive patients with an isolated, solitary intrathyroidal PTMC were identified in a Chinese teaching hospital. Those with more aggressive or advanced PTMCs were not included. Ninety-four patients elected RFA and 80 patients elected surgery for treatment of these PTMC. Nodules were confirmed to be PTMC without an aggressive histological type by core needle biopsy in the RFA group and by final surgical pathology in the surgery group. The extent of surgery was decided based on patient preferences in consultation with the surgeons. Of all the patients, 58 (72.5%) underwent lobectomy, 22 (27.5%) underwent total thyroidectomy, and 53 (66.3%) underwent lymph node dissection. Pre- and post-treatment variables were compared between the two groups, including demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment, local tumor progression, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, local recurrence, complications, and quality-of-life findings. Results: Patient-specific variables were similar between groups, as were oncologic outcomes after 5 years of follow-up. When compared with RFA, surgery took longer, had a longer hospitalization time, and was costlier (all p < 0.001). The surgery group had three complications, with 2 (2.5%) permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries and 1 (1.3%) case of permanent hypoparathyroidism, while none was reported in the RFA group (p = 0.095). The surgery group had a lower post-treatment thyroid-related quality of life. Conclusions: For carefully selected low-risk intrathyroidal PTMC, RFA was not oncologically inferior to open surgery, and it was associated with a higher quality of life and lower overall costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingbo Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Ralph P Tufano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jonathon O Russell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi Qiao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yukun Luo
- Department of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ju JX, Zeng QJ, Xu EJ, He XQ, Tan L, Huang QN, Li K, Zheng RQ. Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound-CT/MR fusion imaging assessment in HCC thermal ablation to reduce local tumor progression: compared with routine contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Int J Hyperthermia 2020; 36:785-793. [PMID: 31431086 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1640899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether local tumor progression (LTP) would be further reduced when contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-CT/MR fusion imaging was used as intraprocedural assessment method in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) thermal ablation compared with routine CEUS. Materials and methods: This prospective non-randomized study was conducted from December 2010 to July 2012. CEUS-CT/MR fusion imaging and routine CEUS were used for treatment response assessment in the ablation procedure of 146 HCCs and 122 HCCs, respectively. Supplementary ablations were performed immediately if necessary. The primary technique efficacy rate, LTP rate and overall survival (OS) rate were calculated. Results: For CEUS-CT/MR fusion imaging and routine CEUS, the technical success rate, technique efficacy rate and supplementary ablation rate were 86.3% (126/146) and 98.4% (120/122) (p = .000), 99.2% (125/126) and 94.2% (113/120) (p = .032), and 14.3% (18/126) and 4.2% (5/120) (p = .006), respectively. The cumulative LTP rate and OS rate were not significantly different between fusion imaging group and routine CEUS group. However, for lesions that were larger than 3 cm or close to major vessels (41 lesions in fusion imaging group and 44 lesions in routine CEUS group, who received transcatheter arterial chemoembolization before ablation), the cumulative LTP rate was significantly lower in fusion imaging group than in routine CEUS group (p = .032). Conclusion: Although intraprocedural CEUS-CT/MR fusion imaging has certain limitations in application, it might provide a potential more efficient method compared with routine CEUS in reducing LTP in HCC thermal ablation, especially for difficult ablation lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Xiu Ju
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Qing-Jing Zeng
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Er-Jiao Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Xu-Qi He
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Lei Tan
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Qian-Nan Huang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China
| | - Rong-Qin Zheng
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University , Guangzhou , China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Camacho JC, Petre EN, Sofocleous CT. Thermal Ablation of Metastatic Colon Cancer to the Liver. Semin Intervent Radiol 2019; 36:310-318. [PMID: 31680722 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is responsible for approximately 10% of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. Liver metastases are frequently seen at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease. Surgical resection is often considered as it provides long-term survival; however, few patients are candidates for resection. Percutaneous ablative therapies are also used in the management of this patient population. Different thermal ablation (TA) technologies are available including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation (MWA), laser, and cryoablation. There is growing evidence about the role of interventional oncology and image-guided percutaneous ablation in the management of metastatic colorectal liver disease. This article aims to outline the technical considerations, outcomes, and rational of TA in the management of patients with CRC liver metastases, focusing on the emerging role of MWA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Camacho
- Department of Radiology, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elena N Petre
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Constantinos T Sofocleous
- Department of Radiology, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
De Angelis C, Vigna PD, Varano GM, Mauri G. Laser thermal ablation to treat a recurrent soft-tissue sarcoma of the leg: a case report. Ecancermedicalscience 2019; 13:908. [PMID: 31123491 PMCID: PMC6445535 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2019.908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
We present the case of a 52-year-old male patient with recurrence of a soft-tissue sarcoma of the left leg treated with percutaneous laser ablation. The patient received the diagnosis of sarcoma for the first time in 2011; further local recurrences and a pulmonary metastatic spread occurred during follow-up, so the patient has been treated several times with chemotherapy, limb-sparing surgery and radiotherapy. In September 2017, a new local recurrence of sarcoma occurred, for which limb amputation was proposed but refused by the patient. Laser ablation with ultrasound guidance was performed, with complete ablation at 6 months and limb salvage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara De Angelis
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Della Vigna
- Division of Interventional Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Gianluca Maria Varano
- Division of Interventional Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mauri
- Division of Interventional Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, via Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yang G, Fang J, Yu T, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Zhao D, Xu J, Wang C. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided laser ablation for the treatment of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis: a pilot study. J Int Med Res 2019; 47:1512-1520. [PMID: 30632441 PMCID: PMC6460608 DOI: 10.1177/0300060518821818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study was performed to assess the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided laser ablation (LA) for the treatment of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis (CTBL). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 11 patients with CTBL (mean age, 32.0 ± 8.6 years; range, 18-47 years) who underwent percutaneous US-guided LA from June 2014 to December 2016 with a subsequent 12-month follow-up. We assessed the mean volume reduction and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) changes of the target lymph nodes as well as the tolerability and adverse effects of LA. RESULTS The mean ablation energy was 522 ± 312 J (range, 204-1317 J). All 17 enrolled target lymph nodes were completely non-enhanced after LA treatment as detected by CEUS, indicating complete ablation of all lymph nodes (100%). The target lymph nodes significantly decreased in volume by a mean of 74.0% ± 15.6% from baseline to 12 months after LA. The LA procedure was well tolerated, and none of the 11 patients developed severe complications during the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION Percutaneous US-guided LA for the treatment of CTBL exhibits good tolerability, minimal invasiveness, and few adverse effects. Further investigations with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaoyi Yang
- 1 Department of Ultrasonography, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
| | - Jianhua Fang
- 2 Department of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
| | - Tianzhuo Yu
- 1 Department of Ultrasonography, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
| | - Ying Zhang
- 1 Department of Ultrasonography, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
| | - Wenzhi Zhang
- 1 Department of Ultrasonography, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
| | - Dan Zhao
- 1 Department of Ultrasonography, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
| | - Jianping Xu
- 1 Department of Ultrasonography, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
| | - Caifen Wang
- 1 Department of Ultrasonography, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Superb Microvascular Imaging Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Assessing Laser Ablation Treatment of Benign Thyroid Nodules. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:1025657. [PMID: 30671442 PMCID: PMC6323482 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1025657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To compare superb microvascular imaging (SMI) with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for evaluating the ablation of benign thyroid nodules. Methods 225 Patients with 256 benign thyroid nodules underwent conventional ultrasound, color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), CEUS, and SMI before and after laser ablation. They were routinely followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The volume and volume reduction rate of the ablated nodules was calculated. Results On SMI, the complete ablated nodules had no microvascular perfusion, while the incompletely ablated nodules had microvascular perfusion at the edge of the nodule. The percentages of the detected incompletely ablated nodules of SMI (37/256, 14.45%) and CEUS (41/256, 16.02%) were comparable, and both were significantly higher than CDFI (P< 0.001). CEUS was used as the criterion to determine whether the nodules were completely ablated. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SMI for detecting incompletely ablated nodules were 90.2, 98.2, and 100%, respectively. The volume of ablated nodules, as measured on ultrasound, was greater than that on CEUS or SMI (both P< 0.001), while CEUS and SMI were similar. The average volume reduction rate of nodules at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was 40.25, 54.98, 76.83, and 95.43%, respectively. Conclusion SMI sensitively detected the capillaries within residual thyroid nodules after laser ablation. The lesion size and detection rate of incompletely ablated nodules via SMI was consistent with that of CEUS. SMI may replace CEUS in certain cases for monitoring the curative effect of laser ablation for benign thyroid nodules.
Collapse
|
23
|
Ye J, Huang G, Zhang X, Xu M, Zhou X, Lin M, Xie X, Xie X. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound fusion imaging predicts local tumor progression by evaluating ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary report. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 36:55-64. [PMID: 30444428 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1530460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jieyi Ye
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guangliang Huang
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoer Zhang
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ming Xu
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Zhou
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Manxia Lin
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohua Xie
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyan Xie
- Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Percutaneous Laser Ablation of Unifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Utility of Conventional Ultrasound and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Assessing Local Therapeutic Response. World J Surg 2018; 42:2476-2484. [PMID: 29488064 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4500-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the use of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in assessing local therapeutic response of percutaneous laser ablation (PLA) for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). METHODS Sixty-four patients with 64 PTMCs who were referred to our hospital from November 2013 to July 2016 were treated with PLA. The extent of ablation was assessed by CEUS at 10-20 min and 7 days after PLA. The size and volume of the ablation zone were evaluated on conventional ultrasound at 1 h, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, and every half-year thereafter, and recurrences were also recorded. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the ablated area was performed at 1, 6 and 12 months after PLA. RESULTS Two incomplete ablations were detected by CEUS, and a second ablation was performed. The mean largest diameter and volume of the ablated area on CEUS at 10-20 min and 7 days after PLA were significantly larger than those of pre-treatment on conventional ultrasound (p < 0.05, for both). At the last follow-up, the mean largest diameter was reduced from 4.6 ± 1.5 to 0.6 ± 1.3 mm (p < 0.0.5), and the average volume was 41.0 ± 40.4 mm3, which decreased to 1.8 ± 6.7 mm3 (p < 0.0.5). A cervical metastatic lymph node was detected on ultrasound and confirmed by ultrasound-guided FNAB at 30 months after PLA. CONCLUSIONS CEUS could play a crucial role in assessing the completeness of PLA for treating PTMC, and conventional ultrasound can not only guide the FNAB process but also is important in the follow-up of PTMC after PLA.
Collapse
|
25
|
Granata V, Fusco R, Avallone A, Catalano O, Piccirillo M, Palaia R, Nasti G, Petrillo A, Izzo F. A radiologist's point of view in the presurgical and intraoperative setting of colorectal liver metastases. Future Oncol 2018; 14:2189-2206. [PMID: 30084273 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Multidisciplinary management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer requires in each phase an adequate choice of the most appropriate imaging modality. The first challenging step is liver lesions detection and characterization, using several imaging modality ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography. The criteria to establish the metastases resectability have been modified. Not only the lesions number and site but also the functional volume remnant after surgery and the quality of the nontumoral liver must be taken into account. Radiologists should identify the liver functional volume remnant and during liver surgical procedures should collaborate with the surgeon to identify all lesions, including those that disappeared after the therapy, using intraoperative ultrasound with or without contrast medium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Granata
- Radiology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Roberta Fusco
- Radiology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Antonio Avallone
- Abdominal Oncology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCSS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Orlando Catalano
- Radiology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Mauro Piccirillo
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Raffaele Palaia
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Guglielmo Nasti
- Abdominal Oncology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCSS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Antonella Petrillo
- Radiology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| | - Francesco Izzo
- Hepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istitutonazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G Pascale, Napoli, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Francica G, Meloni MF, Riccardi L, de Sio I, Terracciano F, Caturelli E, Iadevaia MD, Amoruso A, Roselli P, Chiang J, Scaglione M, Pompili M. Ablation treatment of primary and secondary liver tumors under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance in field practice of interventional ultrasound centers. A multicenter study. Eur J Radiol 2018; 105:96-101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Revised: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
27
|
Korcakova E, Mirka H, Liska V, Hosek P, Bajcurova K. Monitoring after radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) vs. contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT), two days after procedure. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2018; 162:304-309. [PMID: 29790488 DOI: 10.5507/bp.2018.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Our research evaluated the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast enhanced computer tomography (CECT), performed 48 h after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), to detect residual tumor tissue. As recently published studies have evaluated periprocedural CEUS performed within 24 h after procedure and their results were not satisfactory, it seems that postponing the control test by one day could increase the sensitivity of both methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 33 patients with 37 lesions, who met the criteria for our study. The criteria were 1) the treated lesion is sonographically viewable and 2) the patient underwent both CEUS and CECT control 48 h after treatment and additional follow-up 3 months later by CECT. Presence of residual tumor tissue and the size of necrosis were recorded and compared to the results of 3-months CECT. RESULTS Nine residues were present in our group. CEUS and CECT showed similar sensitivity (66.7% and 77.8%, respectively) and identical specificity (both 96.4%) for detection of residual tumor tissue. CEUS significantly underestimated the size of necrosis in comparison to CECT (on average by 2.4 mm, P=0.0005). Over the 3-months follow-up period the size of necrosis decreased in all patients (on average by 7.2 mm, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION The quality of tumor residue detection in 48-h CEUS was comparable to that of 48-h CECT. This finding suggests the CEUS being a feasible substitute for CECT. Both methods show reasonable sensitivity; therefore this timing seems to be appropriate for the first post-treatment control while also allowing for early retreatment if residual tumor tissue is found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Korcakova
- Department of Imaging Methods, Teaching Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Hynek Mirka
- Department of Imaging Methods, Teaching Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Vaclav Liska
- Department of Surgery, Teaching Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Hosek
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Kristyna Bajcurova
- Department of Imaging Methods, Teaching Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The introduction of ultrasound contrast agents has rendered contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) a valuable complementary technique to address clinically significant problems. This pictorial review describes the use of CEUS guidance in abdominal intervention and illustrates such application for a range of clinical indications. Clinical application of CEUS discussed include commonly performed abdominal interventional procedures, such as biopsy, drainage, nephrostomy, biliary intervention, abdominal tumor ablation and its subsequent monitoring, and imaging of vascular complications following abdominal intervention. The purpose of this article is to further familiarize readers with the application of CEUS, particularly its specific strength over alternative imaging modalities, in abdominal intervention.
Collapse
|
29
|
Puijk RS, Ruarus AH, Scheffer HJ, Vroomen LGPH, van Tilborg AAJM, de Vries JJJ, Berger FH, van den Tol PMP, Meijerink MR. Percutaneous Liver Tumour Ablation: Image Guidance, Endpoint Assessment, and Quality Control. Can Assoc Radiol J 2018; 69:51-62. [PMID: 29458955 DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver tumour ablation nowadays represents a routine treatment option for patients with primary and secondary liver tumours. Radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation are the most widely adopted methods, although novel techniques, such as irreversible electroporation, are quickly working their way up. The percutaneous approach is rapidly gaining popularity because of its minimally invasive character, low complication rate, good efficacy rate, and repeatability. However, matched to partial hepatectomy and open ablations, the issue of ablation site recurrences remains unresolved and necessitates further improvement. For percutaneous liver tumour ablation, several real-time imaging modalities are available to improve tumour visibility, detect surrounding critical structures, guide applicators, monitor treatment effect, and, if necessary, adapt or repeat energy delivery. Known predictors for success are tumour size, location, lesion conspicuity, tumour-free margin, and operator experience. The implementation of reliable endpoints to assess treatment efficacy allows for completion-procedures, either within the same session or within a couple of weeks after the procedure. Although the effect on overall survival may be trivial, (local) progression-free survival will indisputably improve with the implementation of reliable endpoints. This article reviews the available needle navigation techniques, evaluates potential treatment endpoints, and proposes an algorithm for quality control after the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robbert S Puijk
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Alette H Ruarus
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hester J Scheffer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Laurien G P H Vroomen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aukje A J M van Tilborg
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jan J J de Vries
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ferco H Berger
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ferraioli G, Meloni MF. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the liver using SonoVue. Ultrasonography 2018; 37:25-35. [PMID: 28830058 PMCID: PMC5769944 DOI: 10.14366/usg.17037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This review focuses on the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with SonoVue (Bracco Imaging) for the diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs), guidance during ablative treatment, and follow-up of liver tumors. Multicenter trials have shown that the performance of CEUS for the characterization of FLLs is similar to that of contrast-enhanced computed tomography or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. CEUS with SonoVue has been effectively used for guiding the percutaneous treatment of malignant liver tumors that are invisible or poorly visualized in traditional gray-scale ultrasonography. Postprocedural CEUS may be used to detect and retreat residual viable tissue in the same ablative session. The use of CEUS for the assessment of diffuse liver disease is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Ferraioli
- Ultrasound Unit, Infectious Diseases Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: Optimizing Technique and Clinical Applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017; 210:320-332. [PMID: 29220210 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.17843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to review the general principles, technique, and clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver. CONCLUSION Proper technique and optimization of contrast-enhanced ultrasound require a balance between maintaining the integrity of the microbubble contrast agent and preserving the ultrasound signal. Established and emerging applications in the liver include diagnosis of focal lesions, aiding ultrasound-guided intervention, monitoring of therapy, and aiding surgical management.
Collapse
|
32
|
Management consensus guideline for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2016 updated by the Taiwan Liver Cancer Association and the Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc 2017; 117:381-403. [PMID: 29074347 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2017.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Revised: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in Taiwan. To help clinical physicians to manage patients with HCC, the Taiwan Liver Cancer Association and the Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan produced the management consensus guideline for HCC. METHODS The recommendations focus on nine important issues on management of HCC, including surveillance, diagnosis, staging, surgery, local ablation, transarterial chemoembolization/transarterial radioembolization/hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, systemic therapy, radiotherapy, and prevention. RESULTS The consensus statements were discussed, debated and got consensus in each expert team. And then the statements were sent to all of the experts for further discussion and refinement. Finally, all of the experts were invited to vote for the statements, including the level of evidence and recommendation. CONCLUSION With the development of the management consensus guideline, HCC patients could benefit from the optimal therapeutic modality.
Collapse
|
33
|
Xu EJ, Lv SM, Li K, Long YL, Zeng QJ, Su ZZ, Zheng RQ. Immediate evaluation and guidance of liver cancer thermal ablation by three-dimensional ultrasound/contrast-enhanced ultrasound fusion imaging. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 34:870-876. [PMID: 28847188 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1373306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Er-Jiao Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Shu-Min Lv
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Ying-Lin Long
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Qing-Jing Zeng
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhong-Zhen Su
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Rong-Qin Zheng
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, Guangzhou, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bo XW, Xu HX, Guo LH, Sun LP, Li XL, Zhao CK, He YP, Liu BJ, Li DD, Zhang K, Wang D. Ablative safety margin depicted by fusion imaging with post-treatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI after radiofrequency ablation for liver cancers. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170063. [PMID: 28749166 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the value of fusion imaging with post-treatment contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and pre-treatment contrast-enhanced CT/MRI (CECT/CEMRI) in evaluating ablative safety margin after percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver cancers. METHODS 34 consecutive patients with 47 liver lesions who had undergone RFA were included. Fusion imaging with post-treatment CEUS and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI was carried out to evaluate local treatment response and ablative safety margin within 1-3 days after RFA. The minimal ablative safety margins of the ablation zones were recorded. The complete response (CR) rate was calculated with reference to CECT/CEMRI results 1 month after RFA. The local tumour progression (LTP) was also recorded. RESULTS Of the 47 ablation zones, 47 (100%) were clearly depicted with CEUS-CECT/CEMRI fusion imaging, 36 (76.6%) with US-CECT/CEMRI fusion imaging and 21 (44.7%) with conventional US (both p < 0.001). The minimal ablative safety margins were great than or equal to 5 mm in 28 ablation zones, between 0 and 5 mm in 15, and less than 0 mm in 4. For the four lesions without enough ablative safety margin, three were referred to follow-up because CEUS showed larger ablation zones than pre-treatment lesions and the remaining lesion was subject to additional RFA 5 days after the first RFA. The CR rate was 95.7% (45/47) with reference to CECT/CEMRI results 1 month after RFA. During 2 to 34 months follow-up, LTP was found in two (4.4%) of 45 lesions with CR. Insufficient ablative safety margin was more commonly found in those lesions with LTP than those without LTP (1/4 vs 1/43, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Fusion imaging with post-treatment CEUS and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI can depict the ablative safety margin accurately after RFA. Inadequate ablative safety margin is associated with LTP. Depiction of ablative safety margin by fusion imaging after ablation might be considered as a routine procedure to assess the treatment response of RFA. Advances in knowledge: Fusion imaging with post-treatment CEUS and pre-treatment CECT/CEMRI is an effective method to evaluate the ablative safety margin early after RFA. Therefore, it should be recommended to be used as a routine procedure after RFA for liver cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Wan Bo
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui-Xiong Xu
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Le-Hang Guo
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Ping Sun
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Long Li
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chong-Ke Zhao
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ya-Ping He
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Bo-Ji Liu
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan-Dan Li
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Kun Zhang
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Dan Wang
- 1 Department of Medical Ultrasound, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.,2 Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hernández-Socorro CR, Saavedra P, Ramírez Felipe J, Bohn Sarmiento U, Ruiz-Santana S. Predictive factors of long-term colorectal cancer survival after ultrasound-controlled ablation of hepatic metastases. Med Clin (Barc) 2017; 148:345-350. [PMID: 28073517 DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2016.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 11/07/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The risk factors associated to long-term survival were assessed in patients with liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma undergoing ablative therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS Single-centre cohort study, retrospectively analysed and prospectively collected consecutive patients with unresectable metastatic liver disease of colorectal carcinoma treated with ablative therapies between 1996 and 2013. Factors associated with survival time were identified using Cox's proportional hazard model with time-dependent covariates. A forward variable selection based on Akaike information criterion was performed. Relative risk and 95% confidence intervals for each factor were calculated. Statistical significance was set as P<.05. RESULTS Seventy-five patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer, with a mean age of 65.6 (10.3) underwent 106 treatments. Variables selected were good quality of life (RR 0.308, 95% CI 0.150-0.632) and tumour extension (RR 3.070, 95% CI 1.776-5.308). The median overall survival was 18.5 months (95% CI 17.4-24.4). The survival prognosis in median was 13.5 vs. 23.4 months for patients with and without tumour extension, and 23.0 vs. 12.8 months for patients with good and fair or poor quality of life, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Good quality of life and tumour extension were the only statistically significant predictors of long-term survival in patients of colorectal carcinoma with liver metastatic disease undergoing ablative treatment with ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Rosa Hernández-Socorro
- Unidad de Ecografía Intervencionista, Servicio de Radiología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España.
| | - Pedro Saavedra
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| | - José Ramírez Felipe
- Servicio de Cirugía General, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| | - Uriel Bohn Sarmiento
- Servicio de Oncología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| | - Sergio Ruiz-Santana
- Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mauri G, Nicosia L, Varano GM, Shyn P, Sartori S, Tombesi P, Di Vece F, Orsi F, Solbiati L. Unusual tumour ablations: report of difficult and interesting cases. Ecancermedicalscience 2017; 11:733. [PMID: 28487751 PMCID: PMC5406223 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2017.733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Image-guided ablations are nowadays applied in the treatment of a wide group of diseases and in different organs and regions, and every day interventional radiologists have to face more difficult and unusual cases of tumour ablation. In the present case review, we report four difficult and unusual cases, reporting some tips and tricks for a successful image-guided treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Mauri
- Division of Interventional Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Postgraduate School of Radiology, University of Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paul Shyn
- Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sergio Sartori
- Section of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Internal Medicine, St Anna Hospital Ferrara, Italy
| | - Paola Tombesi
- Section of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Internal Medicine, St Anna Hospital Ferrara, Italy
| | - Francesca Di Vece
- Section of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Internal Medicine, St Anna Hospital Ferrara, Italy
| | - Franco Orsi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Solbiati
- Department of Radiology, Humanitas University and Research Hospital, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Petre EN, Sofocleous C. Thermal Ablation in the Management of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Oligometastatic Liver Disease. Visc Med 2017; 33:62-68. [PMID: 28612019 DOI: 10.1159/000454697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection of limited colorectal liver disease improves long-term survival and can be curative in a subset of selected cases. Image-guided percutaneous ablation therapies have emerged as safe and effective alternative options for selected patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) that can be ablated with margins. Ablation causes focal destruction of tissue and has increasingly been shown to provide durable eradication of tumors. METHODS A selective review of literature was conducted in PubMed, focusing on recent studies reporting on the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of percutaneous ablation modalities in the treatment of CLM. The present work gives an overview of the different ablation techniques, their current clinical indications, and reported outcomes from most recently published studies. The 'test of time' concept for using ablation as a first local therapy is also described. RESULTS There are several thermal ablative tools currently available, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation, and cryoablation. Most data to date originated from the application of RFA. Adjuvant thermal ablation in the treatment of oligometastatic colon cancer liver disease offers improved oncologic outcomes. The ideal CLM amenable to percutaneous ablation is a solitary tumor with the largest diameter up to 3 cm that can be completely ablated with a sufficient margin. 5-year overall survival rates up to 70% after ablation of unresectable CLM have been reported. Pathologic confirmation of complete tumor necrosis with margins over 5 mm provides best long-term local tumor control by thermal ablation. CONCLUSION Current evidence suggests that percutaneous ablation as adjuvant to chemotherapy improves oncologic outcomes of patients with CLM. For small tumors that can be ablated completely with clear margins, percutaneous ablation may offer outcomes similar to those of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Nadia Petre
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Constantinos Sofocleous
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Meloni MF, Chiang J, Laeseke PF, Dietrich CF, Sannino A, Solbiati M, Nocerino E, Brace CL, Lee FT. Microwave ablation in primary and secondary liver tumours: technical and clinical approaches. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 33:15-24. [PMID: 27416729 PMCID: PMC5235993 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2016.1209694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Thermal ablation is increasingly being utilised in the treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumours, both as curative therapy and as a bridge to transplantation. Recent advances in high-powered microwave ablation systems have allowed physicians to realise the theoretical heating advantages of microwave energy compared to other ablation modalities. As a result there is a growing body of literature detailing the effects of microwave energy on tissue heating, as well as its effect on clinical outcomes. This article will discuss the relevant physics, review current clinical outcomes and then describe the current techniques used to optimise patient care when using microwave ablation systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Franca Meloni
- a Department of Radiology , Interventional Ultrasound, Institute of Care IGEA , Milan , Italy
| | - Jason Chiang
- b Department of Radiology , University of Wisconsin , Madison , Wisconsin , USA
| | - Paul F Laeseke
- b Department of Radiology , University of Wisconsin , Madison , Wisconsin , USA
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- c Department of Internal Medicine , Caritas Krankenhas Bad Mergentheim , Bad Mergentheim , Germany
| | - Angela Sannino
- d Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery , University of Naples Federico II , Naples , Italy
| | - Marco Solbiati
- e Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering , Politecnico Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Elisabetta Nocerino
- f Department of Radiology , San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan , Milan , Italy
| | - Christopher L Brace
- b Department of Radiology , University of Wisconsin , Madison , Wisconsin , USA
| | - Fred T Lee
- b Department of Radiology , University of Wisconsin , Madison , Wisconsin , USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Li K, Su ZZ, Xu EJ, Ju JX, Meng XC, Zheng RQ. Improvement of ablative margins by the intraoperative use of CEUS-CT/MR image fusion in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:277. [PMID: 27090513 PMCID: PMC4836159 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2306-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess whether intraoperative use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-CT/MR image fusion can accurately evaluate ablative margin (AM) and guide supplementary ablation to improve AM after hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ablation. METHODS Ninety-eight patients with 126 HCCs designated to undergo thermal ablation treatment were enrolled in this prospective study. CEUS-CT/MR image fusion was performed intraoperatively to evaluate whether 5-mm AM was covered by the ablative area. If possible, supplementary ablation was applied at the site of inadequate AM. The CEUS image quality, the time used for CEUS-CT/MR image fusion and the success rate of image fusion were recorded. Local tumor progression (LTP) was observed during follow-up. Clinical factors including AM were examined to identify risk factors for LTP. RESULTS The success rate of image fusion was 96.2% (126/131), and the duration required for image fusion was 4.9 ± 2.0 (3-13) min. The CEUS image quality was good in 36.1% (53/147) and medium in 63.9% (94/147) of the cases. By supplementary ablation, 21.8% (12/55) of lesions with inadequate AMs became adequate AMs. During follow-up, there were 5 LTPs in lesions with inadequate AMs and 1 LTP in lesions with adequate AMs. Multivariate analysis showed that AM was the only independent risk factor for LTP (hazard ratio, 9.167; 95% confidence interval, 1.070-78.571; p = 0.043). CONCLUSION CEUS-CT/MR image fusion is feasible for intraoperative use and can serve as an accurate method to evaluate AMs and guide supplementary ablation to lower inadequate AMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Li
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, , Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Zhong-Zhen Su
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, , Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Er-Jiao Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, , Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Jin-Xiu Ju
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, , Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Xiao-Chun Meng
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, , Guangdong Province, PR China
| | - Rong-Qin Zheng
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 600 Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, 510630, , Guangdong Province, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Chang XW, Ma XX, Zhu RT, Li J. Imaging evaluation of residual cancer after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2016; 24:1539-1544. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v24.i10.1539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary liver cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, and only a few patients have the chance of surgical resection. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a good treatment for patients with unresectable liver cancer. The existence of residual cancer after radiofrequency ablation has a direct impact on the prognosis of patients, so it is important to accurately determine whether there is residual cancer after RFA treatment in order to reduce the local recurrence and prolong the survival time of patients. In this paper, we discuss the evaluation of residual cancer after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma by ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and nuclear medicine modalities.
Collapse
|
41
|
Meloni MF, Smolock A, Cantisani V, Bezzi M, D'Ambrosio F, Proiti M, Lee F, Aiani L, Calliada F, Ferraioli G. Contrast enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation and percutaneous treatment of hepatic and renal tumors. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84:1666-1674. [PMID: 26094868 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Revised: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Image-guided percutaneous ablation techniques are increasingly being used for the treatment of malignant tumors of the liver and kidney. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a real-time dynamic imaging technique that plays an important role in the pre-, intra-, and post-procedural management of these patients. This review will focus on the role of CEUS in the evaluation of patients undergoing treatment with percutaneous ablation for hepatic or renal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amanda Smolock
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Anatomo-Pathology "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Bezzi
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Anatomo-Pathology "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
- Department of Radiology, Oncology and Anatomo-Pathology "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Proiti
- Department of Internal Medicine, Vittorio-Emanuele University Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Fred Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Luca Aiani
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Calliada
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giovanna Ferraioli
- Ultrasound Unit, Infectious Diseases Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hernández-Socorro CR, Henríquez-Palop F, Santana-Toledo L, Gallego-Samper R, Rodríguez-Pérez JC. Radiofrequency ablation as an alternative therapy for renal neoplasms in graft recipients. A preliminary study. Nefrologia 2015; 35:514-6. [PMID: 26306951 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2015.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2014] [Accepted: 03/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Rosa Hernández-Socorro
- Ecografía, Radiología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España.
| | - Fernando Henríquez-Palop
- Nefrología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| | - Leopoldo Santana-Toledo
- Ecografía, Radiología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| | - Roberto Gallego-Samper
- Nefrología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| | - Jose Carlos Rodríguez-Pérez
- Nefrología, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, España
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ringe KI, Wacker F, Raatschen HJ. Is there a need for MRI within 24 hours after CT-guided percutaneous thermoablation of the liver? Acta Radiol 2015; 56:10-7. [PMID: 24445091 DOI: 10.1177/0284185114520858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are established minimally invasive techniques for treatment of hepatic tumors. PURPOSE To compare technical success and accuracy of hepatic thermoablation using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquired 24 h after ablation with regard to evaluation of the post-interventional ablation zone and local tumor recurrence (LTR), and to assess whether additional MRI within 24 h is beneficial. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-two patients (23 men, 9 women; mean age, 60 years) with 48 lesions were included in this retrospective study. CT was performed immediately and MRI was performed 24 h after ablation. Diameter and volume calculations of the ablation zone were compared (T-Test). Technical success and ablation margin distinction, shape, and configuration were evaluated (κ-statistic). Local effectiveness was calculated based on follow-up imaging. Technical success and ablation margin features were correlated with LTR (log-rank test, Fisher's exact test). RESULTS Ablation zone volumes were significantly higher with MRI compared to CT (P < 0.05; mean volume, 55.19 and 45.97 mL). Agreement between CT and MRI for technical success was good (κ = 0.801) and for margin conspicuity fair (κ = 0.289). LTR was 26.1% (mean follow-up, 11.7 months). LTR showed no correlation with technical success or margin conspicuity. CONCLUSION CT and MRI are suited for early evaluation of technical success after thermoablation. Within 24 h a significant increase of the ablation volume is observed, which has to be taken into account when interpreting immediate postprocedural imaging and treating lesions near critical structures. Additional MRI 24 h after ablation seems of limited value regarding prognosis of LTR, especially with regards to evaluation of ablation margin shape and conspicuity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Imeen Ringe
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Wacker
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Raatschen
- Hannover Medical School, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mauri G, Porazzi E, Cova L, Restelli U, Tondolo T, Bonfanti M, Cerri A, Ierace T, Croce D, Solbiati L. Intraprocedural contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in liver percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: clinical impact and health technology assessment. Insights Imaging 2014; 5:209-216. [PMID: 24563244 PMCID: PMC3999370 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2013] [Revised: 01/20/2014] [Accepted: 01/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas. METHODS One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93 patients were treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and immediate assessment by intraprocedural CEUS. Clinical impact, cost effectiveness, and budget, organisational and equity impacts were evaluated and compared with standard treatment without intraprocedural CEUS using the health technology assessment approach. RESULTS Intraprocedural CEUS detected incomplete ablation in 34/93 (36.5 %) patients, who underwent additional treatment during the same session. At 24-h, complete ablation was found in 88/93 (94.6 %) patients. Thus, a second session of treatment was spared in 29/93 (31.1 %) patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an advantage for the use of intraprocedural CEUS in comparison with standard treatment (4,639 vs 6,592) with a 21.9 % reduction of the costs to treat the whole sample. Cost per patient for complete treatment was 4,609 versus 5,872 respectively. The introduction of intraprocedural CEUS resulted in a low organisational impact, and in a positive impact on equity CONCLUSIONS Intraprocedural use of CEUS has a relevant clinical impact, reducing the number of re-treatments and the related costs per patient. TEACHING POINTS • CEUS allows to immediately asses the result of ablation. • Intraprocedural CEUS decreases the number of second ablative sessions. • Intraprocedural CEUS may reduce cost per patient for complete treatment. • Use of intraprocedural CEUS may reduce hospital budget. • Its introduction has low organisational impact, and relevant impact on equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Mauri
- IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Unit of Radiology, Piazza Malan 2-20097 San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Correlation between ultrasound reflection intensity and tumor ablation ratio of late-stage pancreatic carcinoma in HIFU therapy: dynamic observation on ultrasound reflection intensity. ScientificWorldJournal 2013; 2013:852874. [PMID: 24453916 PMCID: PMC3888756 DOI: 10.1155/2013/852874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2013] [Accepted: 10/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The minimally invasive high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy is thermal ablation treatment for late-stage pancreatic carcinoma with widely recognized safety and effectiveness, but there are currently no instant assessment methods for its ablation effect. It is vital to find a real-time high-sensitive assessment method. This research aims to dynamically observe the variation rules of ultrasound reflection intensity, analyze the correlation between ultrasound reflection intensity and tumor ablation ratio, and find out the value of ultrasound reflection intensity in prognosis of HIFU ablation effect. HIFU intermittent therapies were retrospectively analyzed for 31 subjects with late-stage pancreatic carcinoma from March 2007 to December 2009 in the study. The variation rules of the ultrasound reflection intensity during HIFU therapy were summarized and the correlation between ultrasound reflection intensity and tumor ablation ratio was analyzed based on the tumor ablation ratio indicated by CT scanning. The conclusion is that variation of ultrasound reflection intensity can be used for initial assessment of tumor ablation in HIFU therapy and early prognosis of overall HIFU ablation, providing important clinical basis for improving safety and effectiveness of HIFU therapy. Ultrasound can work as a real-time imaging instrument for observation of HIFU ablation effect in treating late-stage pancreatic carcinoma.
Collapse
|
46
|
Di Vece F, Tombesi P, Ermili F, Maraldi C, Sartori S. Coagulation Areas Produced by Cool-Tip Radiofrequency Ablation and Microwave Ablation Using a Device to Decrease Back-Heating Effects: A Prospective Pilot Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 37:723-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00270-013-0733-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2013] [Accepted: 08/09/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
47
|
Pintoffl JP, Weisel K, Schulze M, Maksimovic O, Claussen CD, Kramer U, Horger M. Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced sonography for characterization and monitoring of extramedullary myeloma: comparison with serologic data. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE 2013; 32:1777-1788. [PMID: 24065259 DOI: 10.7863/ultra.32.10.1777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To measure blood perfusion in extramedullary myeloma by contrast-enhanced sonography, correlate it with specific hematologic parameters, and determine their utility for local and systemic response monitoring. METHODS Twenty-five consecutive patients (14 male and 11 female; median age, 68 years) with extramedullary myeloma were included. After intravenous administration of 2.4 mL of sulfur hexafluoride, extramedullary myeloma masses were examined for 60 seconds. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced sonography at baseline, and 15 were monitored additionally (3 weeks during therapy). Average peak perfusion, regional blood flow (RBF), and regional blood volume (RBV) were calculated. Baseline perfusion parameters were compared with short-term follow-up sonographic data and serologic biomarkers (M gradient). For validation of extramedullary myeloma and systemic myeloma, patients underwent midterm (<3 months) imaging and serologic diagnosis. RESULTS Patients with baseline β2-microglobulin (B2M) greater than 3.5 mg/L (n = 17) showed higher perfusion parameters compared with baseline B2M less than 3.5 mg/L (n = 8). At short-term follow-up, patients were classified by serologic criteria as responders (n = 9) and nonresponders (n = 6) and by sonographic criteria as responders (n = 10) and nonresponders (n = 5). In sonographic responders, mean peak, RBV, and RBF dropped from 59.13, 1446.09, and 71.52 (artificial units) at baseline to 29.30, 364.19, and 34.64 at follow-up (P < .05), whereas in nonresponders, perfusion parameters increased from 33.18, 789.82, and 36.92 at baseline to 51.14, 1491.06, and 65.34 at follow-up (P > .05). Prediction of a midterm course of systemic myeloma using serologic data yielded sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.66, 0.77, 0.66, and 0.77, whereas sonographic results (judged by RBV) yielded values of 0.66, 0.55, 0.5, and 0.71. Separate prediction of a local (extramedullary myeloma) response by sonography yielded sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 0.8, 1.0, 1.0, and 0.71. CONCLUSIONS Contrast-enhanced sonography is a valuable tool for short-term monitoring of the treatment response in extramedullary myeloma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan P Pintoffl
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Böttcher J, Hansch A, Pfeil A, Schmidt P, Malich A, Schneeweiss A, Maurer MH, Streitparth F, Teichgräber UK, Renz DM. Detection and classification of different liver lesions: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI versus multiphasic spiral CT in a clinical single centre investigation. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:1860-9. [PMID: 23932636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2012] [Revised: 06/23/2013] [Accepted: 06/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic efficacy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the detection and classification of focal liver lesions, differentiated also for lesion entity and size; a separate analysis of pre- and postcontrast images as well as T2-weighted MRI sequences of focal and exclusively solid lesions was integrated. METHODS Twenty-nine patients with 130 focal liver lesions underwent MDCT (64-detector-row; contrast medium iopromide; native, arterial, portalvenous, venous phase) and MRI (1.5-T; dynamic and tissue-specific phase 20 min after application of Gd-EOB-DTPA). Hepatic lesions were verified against a standard of reference (SOR). CT and MR images were independently analysed by four blinded radiologists on an ordinal 6-point-scale, determining lesion classification and diagnostic confidence. RESULTS Among 130 lesions, 68 were classified as malignant and 62 as benign by SOR. The detection of malignant and benign lesions differed significantly between combined and postcontrast MRI vs. MDCT; overall detection rate was 91.5% for combined MRI and 80.4% for combined MDCT (p<0.05). Considering all four readers together, combined MDCT achieved sensitivity of 66.2%, specificity of 79.0%, and diagnostic accuracy of 72.3%; combined MRI reached superior diagnostic efficacy: sensitivity 86.8%, specificity 94.4%, accuracy 90.4% (p<0.05). Differentiated for lesion size, in particular lesions <20mm revealed diagnostic benefit by MRI. Postcontrast MRI also achieved higher overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy compared to postcontrast MDCT for focal and exclusively solid liver lesions (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Combined and postcontrast Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI provided significantly higher overall detection rate and diagnostic accuracy, including low inter-observer variability, compared to MDCT in a single centre study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim Böttcher
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, SRH Clinic Gera, Str. des Friedens 122, 07548 Gera, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ryan ER, Sofocleous CT, Schöder H, Carrasquillo JA, Nehmeh S, Larson SM, Thornton R, Siegelbaum RH, Erinjeri JP, Solomon SB. Split-dose technique for FDG PET/CT-guided percutaneous ablation: a method to facilitate lesion targeting and to provide immediate assessment of treatment effectiveness. Radiology 2013; 268:288-95. [PMID: 23564714 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe a split-dose technique for fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT)-guided ablation that permits both target localization and evaluation of treatment effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approved the study with a waiver of consent. From July to December 2011, 23 patients (13 women, 10 men; mean age, 59 years; range, 35-87 years) with 29 FDG-avid tumors (median size, 1.4 cm; range, 0.6-4.4 cm) were targeted for ablation. The location of the lesion was the liver (n = 23), lung (n = 4), adrenal gland (n = 1), and thigh (n = 1). Radiofrequency ablation was performed in 17 lesions; microwave ablation, in six; irreversible electroporation, in five; and cryoablation, in one. The pathologic condition of the tumor was metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma in 18 lesions, primary hepatocellular carcinoma in one lesion, and a variety of metastatic tumors in the remaining 10 lesions. A total of 4 mCi (148 MBq) of FDG was administered before the procedure for localization and imaging guidance. At completion of the ablation, an additional 8 mCi (296 MBq) of FDG was administered to assess ablation adequacy. Results of subsequent imaging follow-up were used to determine if postablation imaging after the second dose of FDG reliably helped predict complete tumor ablation. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results. RESULTS Twenty-eight of 29 (97%) ablated lesions showed no residual FDG activity after the second intraprocedural FDG dose. One patient with residual activity underwent immediate biopsy that revealed residual viable tumor and was immediately re-treated. Follow-up imaging at a median of 155 days (range, 92-257 days) after ablation showed local recurrences in two (7%) lesions that were originally negative at postablation PET. CONCLUSION Split-dose FDG PET/CT may be a useful tool to provide both guidance and endpoint evaluation, allowing an opportunity for repeat intervention if necessary. Further work is necessary to validate these concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ronan Ryan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Suite H118, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|