Imaging of liver transplantation

Non-invasive imaging biomarkers in chronic liver disease

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a global and worldwide clinical challenge, considering that different underlying liver entities can lead to hepatic dysfunction. In the past, blood tests and clinical evaluation were the main noninvasive tools used to detect, diagnose and follow-up patients with CLD; in case of clinical suspicion of CLD or unclear diagnosis, liver biopsy has been considered as the reference standard to rule out different chronic liver conditions. Nowadays, noninvasive tests have gained a central role in the clinical pathway. Particularly, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and cross-sectional imaging techniques can provide transversal information to clinicians, helping them to correctly manage, treat and follow patients during time. Cross-sectional imaging techniques, namely computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have plenty of potential. Both techniques allow to compute the liver surface nodularity (LSN), associated with CLDs and risk of decompensation. MRI can also help quantify fatty liver infiltration, mainly with the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) sequences, and detect and quantify fibrosis, especially thanks to elastography (MRE). Advanced techniques, such as intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), T1- and T2- mapping are promising tools for detecting fibrosis deposition. Furthermore, the injection of hepatobiliary contrast agents has gained an important role not only in liver lesion characterization but also in assessing liver function, especially in CLDs. Finally, the broad development of radiomics signatures, applied to CT and MR, can be considered the next future approach to CLDs. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current advancements and applications of both invasive and noninvasive imaging techniques in the evaluation and management of CLD.

Ultrasonography of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Diagnosis to Prognosis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a prominent contributor to cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early detection and diagnosis of liver cancer can significantly improve its prognosis and patient survival. Ultrasound technology, serving has undergone substantial advances as the primary method of HCC surveillance and has broadened its scope in recent years for effective management of HCC. This article is a comprehensive overview of ultrasound technology in the treatment of HCC, encompassing early detection, diagnosis, staging, treatment evaluation, and prognostic assessment. In addition, the authors summarized the application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of HCC and assessment of prognosis. Finally, the authors discussed further directions in this field by emphasizing overcoming existing obstacles and integrating cutting-edge technologies.

European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (1) pre-transplant evaluation

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment in end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element for successful organ-transplantation to assist surgical planning. So far, only limited data regarding the best radiological approach to prepare children for liver transplantation is available.

OBJECTIVES

In an attempt to harmonize imaging surrounding pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology (ESPR) Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phase. This paper reports the responses on preoperative imaging.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey. From 2018 to 2020, the participating centers collectively conducted 1,524 transplantations, with a median of 20 transplantations per center per annum (range, 8-60).

RESULTS

Most sites (64%) consider ultrasound their preferred modality to define anatomy and to plan surgery in children before liver transplantation, and additional cross-sectional imaging is only used to answer specific questions (computed tomography [CT], 90.9%; magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], 54.5%). One-third of centers (31.8%) rely primarily on CT for pre-transplant evaluation. Imaging protocols differed substantially regarding applied CT scan ranges, number of contrast phases (range 1-4 phases), and applied MRI techniques.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic imaging is generally used in the work-up of children before liver transplantation. Substantial differences were noted regarding choice of modalities and protocols. We have identified starting points for future optimization and harmonization of the imaging approach to multicenter studies.

European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (2) intraoperative imaging

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of intraoperative and postoperative complications. So far, only limited data regarding the best radiological approach to monitor children during liver transplantation is available.

OBJECTIVE

To harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra- and postoperative phase. This paper reports the responses related to intraoperative imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey.

RESULTS

Intraoperative ultrasound (US) is used by all sites to assess the quality of the vascular anastomosis in order to ensure optimal perfusion of the liver transplant. Vessel depiction is commonly achieved using color Doppler (95.3%). Additional US-based techniques are employed by fewer centers (power angio mode, 28.6%; B-flow, 19%; contrast-enhanced US, 14.3%). Most centers prefer a collaborative approach, with surgeons responsible for probe handling, while radiologists operate the US machine (47.6%). Less commonly, the intraoperative US is performed by the surgeon alone (28.6%) or by the radiologist alone (23.8%). Timing of US, imaging frequency, and documentation practices vary among centers.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative US is consistently utilized across all sites during pediatric liver transplantation. However, considerable variations were observed in terms of the US setup, technique preferences, timing of controls, and documentation practices. These differences provide valuable insights for future optimization and harmonization studies.

European Society of Pediatric Radiology survey of perioperative imaging in pediatric liver transplantation: (3) postoperative imaging

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the state-of-the-art curative treatment for end-stage liver disease. Imaging is a key element in the detection of postoperative complications. So far, limited data is available regarding the best radiologic approach to monitor children after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

To harmonize the imaging of pediatric liver transplantation, the European Society of Pediatric Radiology Abdominal Taskforce initiated a survey addressing the current status of imaging including the pre-, intra-, and postoperative phases. This paper reports the responses related to postoperative imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey, initiated in 2021, asked European centers performing pediatric liver transplantation 48 questions about their imaging approach. In total, 26 centers were contacted, and 22 institutions from 11 countries returned the survey.

RESULTS

All sites commence ultrasound (US) monitoring within 24 h after liver transplantation. Monitoring frequency varies across sites, ranging from every 8 h to 72 h in early, and from daily to sporadic use in late postoperative phases. Predefined US protocols are used by 73% of sites. This commonly includes gray scale, color Doppler, and quantitative flow assessment. Alternative flow imaging techniques, contrast-enhanced US, and elastography are applied at 31.8%, 18.2%, and 63.6% of sites, respectively. Computed tomography is performed at 86.4% of sites when clarification is needed. Magnetic resonance imaging is used for selected cases at 36.4% of sites, mainly for assessment of biliary abnormalities or when blood tests are abnormal.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic imaging is extensively used for postoperative surveillance of children after liver transplantation. While US is generally prioritized, substantial differences were noted in US protocol, timing, and monitoring frequency. The study highlights potential areas for future optimization and standardization of imaging, essential for conducting multicenter studies.

Biliary complications after adult to adult right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (A-ARLLDLT): Analysis of 245 cases during 16 years period at a single high centre- A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Biliary complications (BCs) after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation (A-ALDLT) result in poor graft and patient survival. This study aimed to analyze these complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed BCs in 245 recipients who underwent A-ALDLT using the right-lobe graft during 16 years period in our centre. The overall male/female ratio was 215/30.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five BCs affected 102 of our recipients (95 early (≤3months) and 60 late (≥3months)). They were classified as 67/245(27.3%) early bile leak, 10/245(4.1%) early biliary stricture, 44/245(17.9%) late biliary stricture, 4/245(1.6%) early cholangitis, 10/245(4.1%) late cholangitis, 14/245(5.7%) early biloma, and 6/245(2.4%) late cholangitic abscesses. Multiple biliary anastomoses were independently correlated with Post liver transplantation (LT) overall BCs; moreover, post LT hepatic artery thrombosis or stenosis (HAT/S) was an independent predictor of overall BCs, strictures and leaks. The mortality affected 96(39.2%) cases mostly due to sepsis, bleeding and multi-organ failure (MOF). On the other hand, the biliary related mortality was 10.6% of cases. Multiple cholangitic hepatic abscesses were significant predictors of poor graft and patient outcomes. Conclusions: Multiple biliary anastomoses and post LT HAT/S lead to a poor biliary outcome, furthermore, cholangitis, cholangitic abscesses and sepsis lead to poor graft and patient outcomes, so proper management of those variables is mandatory to improve outcomes after A-ARLLDLT.

Biliary complications in recipients of living donor liver transplantation: A single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Biliary complications (BCs) after liver transplantation (LT) remain a considerable cause of morbidity, mortality, increased cost, and graft loss.

AIM

To investigate the impact of BCs on chronic graft rejection, graft failure and mortality.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2016, 215 adult recipients underwent right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (RT-LDLT) at our centre. We excluded 46 recipients who met the exclusion criteria, and 169 recipients were included in the final analysis. Donors' and recipients' demographic data, clinical data, operative details and postoperative course information were collected. We also reviewed the management and outcomes of BCs. Recipients were followed for at least 12 mo post-LT until December 2017 or graft or patient loss.

RESULTS

The overall incidence rate of BCs including biliary leakage, biliary infection and biliary stricture was 57.4%. Twenty-seven (16%) patients experienced chronic graft rejection. Graft failure developed in 20 (11.8%) patients. A total of 28 (16.6%) deaths occurred during follow-up. BCs were a risk factor for the occurrence of chronic graft rejection and failure; however, mortality was determined by recurrent hepatitis C virus infection.

CONCLUSION

Biliary complications after RT-LDLT represent an independent risk factor for chronic graft rejection and graft failure; nonetheless, effective management of these complications can improve patient and graft survival.

Liver Transplantation in Malignancies: A Comprehensive and Systematic Review on Oncological Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation (LT) is today's standard treatment for both end-stage liver disease and tumors; however, suitable grafts for LT are a scarce resource and outcome after LT is highly dependent on its underlying indication. Thus, patients must be carefully selected to optimize the number of life years gained per graft. This comprehensive and systematic review critically reflects the most recently published oncological outcome data after LT in malignancies based on the preoperative radiological findings.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to detect preferentially most recent high-volume series or large database analysis on oncological outcomes after LT for both primary liver cancer and liver metastases between January 1, 2019, and November 14, 2020. A comprehensive review on the radiological assessment of the reviewed liver malignancies is included and its preoperative value for an outcome-driven indication reflected.

RESULTS

Twenty most recent high-volume or relevant studies including a total number of 2,521 patients were identified including 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, and 1 publications on oncological outcome after LT for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, hepatic epitheloid hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma, and both metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and colorectal cancer, respectively. The overall survival is comparable to patients without tumors if patients with malignancies are well selected for LT; however, this is highly dependent on tumor entity, tumor stage, and both neoadjuvant and concomitant treatment.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

LT is a promising option for better survival in patients with malignant liver tumors in selected patients; however, the indication must be critically discussed prior to LT in every single case in the context of organ shortage.

An Italian survey on the use of T-tube in liver transplantation: old habits die hard!

There is enough clinical evidence that a T-tube use in biliary reconstruction at adult liver transplantation (LT) does not significantly modify the risk of biliary stricture/leak, and it may even sustain infective and metabolic complications. Thus, the policy on T-tube use has been globally changing, with progressive application of more restrictive selection criteria. However, there are no currently standardized indications in such change, and many LT Centers rely only on own experience and routine. A nation-wide survey was conducted among all the 20 Italian adult LT Centers to investigate the current policy on T-tube use. It was found that 20% of Centers completely discontinued the T-tube use, while 25% Centers used it routinely in all LT cases. The remaining 55% of Centers applied a selective policy, based on criteria of technical complexity of biliary reconstruction (72.7%), followed by low-quality graft (63.6%) and high-risk recipient (36.4%). A T-tube use > 50% of annual caseload was not associated with high-volume Center status (> 70 LT per year), an active pediatric or living-donor transplant program, or use of DCD grafts. Only 10/20 (50%) Centers identified T-tube as a potential risk factor for complications other than biliary stricture/leak. In these cases, the suspected pathogenic mechanism comprised bacterial colonization (70%), malabsorption (70%), interruption of the entero-hepatic bile-acid cycle (50%), biliary inflammation due to an indwelling catheter (40%) and gut microbiota changes (40%). In conclusion, the prevalence of T-tube use among the Italian LT Centers is still relatively high, compared to the European trend (33%), and the potential detrimental effect of T-tube, beyond biliary stricture/leak, seems to be somehow underestimated.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound applications in liver transplant imaging

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is gaining ever-increasing acceptance in the preoperative and postoperative evaluation of liver-transplanted patients. While indications are still a matter of research, CEUS is used in tertiary centers to supplement ultrasound (US) and Color Doppler US examination, with the potential of providing a comprehensive first-line ultrasound-based diagnosis. Alternatively, CEUS is used as a problem-solving tool when previous cross-sectional or US imaging was inconclusive, especially in assessing hepatocellular carcinoma, parenchymal perfusion abnormalities, the vascular status, and even the biliary tree. This review describes the potential use for CEUS in the setting of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

Complications of liver transplant

Liver transplantation has become a definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and those meeting Milan criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. The morbidity and mortality associated with liver transplantation continues to decrease thanks to refinements in surgical technique, immunosuppression, and imaging. In particular, imaging plays a vital role by facilitating early detection of post-operative complications and enabling prompt treatment. Post-operative complications that lead to graft failure and patient morbidity/mortality can be generally categorized as vascular, biliary, parenchymal, and malignant. Vascular complications include stenosis and thrombosis of the hepatic artery, portal vein, and inferior vena cava; hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm; arteriovenous fistula; and celiac stenosis. Biliary abnormalities include strictures, bile leak, obstruction, recurrent disease, and infection. While imaging is not primarily utilized to diagnose allograft rejection, it plays an important role in excluding mechanical causes of graft dysfunction that can mimic rejection. Ultrasound is routinely performed as the first-line imaging evaluation for the detection and follow-up of early and delayed complications. Cholangiography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are useful in detecting and characterizing biliary complications. Computed tomography is often used to further evaluate abnormal findings on ultrasound or for the characterization of post-operative fluid collections. The aim of this review is to discuss and illustrate the imaging findings of complications associated with liver transplantation and their role in facilitating treatment.

Improved Display of Hepatic Arterial Anatomy Using Differential Subsampling With Cartesian Ordering (DISCO) With Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: Comparison With Single Arterial Phase MRI and Computed Tomographic Angiography

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice arterial anatomy evaluation is often determined using computed tomographic angiography (CTA); the effect of enhanced MRI has been neglected.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether multiple arterial phase (MAP) images from patients who underwent differential subsampling with Cartesian ordering (DISCO) acquisition would improve the hepatic arterial display compared with single arterial phase (SAP) and CTA.

STUDY TYPE

A prospective, randomized trial.

SUBJECTS

In all, 130 patients (mean age, 55.81 ± 9.43 years; range, 35-78 years) including 89 men and 41 women.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

3.0T, DISCO, liver acquisition with volume acceleration-flexible (LAVA-Flex), CTA.

ASSESSMENT

A simple randomization was conducted and the study was subdivided into study part I (DISCO vs. SAP) and study part II (DISCO vs. CTA). Ten hepatic arterial segments were independently evaluated by three readers in the axial plane and the quality of hepatic arterial display was assessed using a four-point scale.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Kendall's W-test, χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.

RESULTS

Excellent interobserver agreement was obtained for hepatic arterial display (all Kendall's W values >0.80). For study part I, the mean arterial display scores for the common hepatic artery (CHA), proper hepatic artery (PHA), left hepatic artery (LHA), right hepatic artery (RHA), left gastric artery (LGA), and gastroduodenal artery (GDA) obtained with DISCO were higher than that obtained with SAP imaging (all P < 0.01). For study part II, comparable image quality for CHA (P = 0.798), PHA (P = 0.440), LHA (P = 0.211), RHA (P = 0.775) LGA (P = 0.468), and GDA (P = 0.801) was obtained with DISCO and CTA.

DATA CONCLUSION

The use of MAP acquisition with DISCO is superior to the use of SAP in hepatic arterial display and compares favorably with CTA; in the future, DISCO possibly can replace the latter ionization-related method to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the liver arterial vessels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1766-1776.

Can Preoperative Multidetector Computed Tomography Identify Predictive Features of Difficult Native Hepatectomy at Liver Transplantation?

BACKGROUND

Native hepatectomy represents the most demanding surgical step during orthotopic whole liver transplantation (LT). The surgical risk assessment of LT candidates is currently mainly based on clinical and laboratory data, but even preoperative imaging data may be predictive of a complex native hepatectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective study on a cohort of 110 LT recipients was conducted. The radiologic variables investigated on pre-LT multidetector computed tomography scan were the length of the retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC-L), volume of the dorsal liver sector (DLS-V), complete encirclement of the IVC by the DLS (IVC-CE), max diameter of the native liver (L-D), max diameter of the spleen (S-D), and presence of large spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS). The parameters defining complex native hepatectomy were the operative time, number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused, IVC replacement technique switch, and post-LT relaparotomy for major bleeding.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis, the operative time was predicted by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis (regression coefficient [RC]: 18.237, P = .009), S-D (RC: 3.733, P = .007), and IVC-CE (RC: 20.174, P = .01); the RBC units transfused by an history of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (RC: 2.503, P = .039), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (RC: .259, P = .039), and L-D (RC: -0.519, P = .027); the switch to a IVC replacement technique by L-D (odds ratio [OR]: 0.641, P = .028) and IVC-L (OR: 1.065, P = .023); and the relaparotomy for bleeding by L-D (OR: 0.632, confidence interval [CI]: 0.437 to 0.916, P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-LT multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) seems to be a very useful tool in the surgical risk assessment of LT candidates.

Role of imaging in the evaluation of vascular complications after liver transplantation

Clinical manifestations of liver transplantation complications can be subtle and non-specific. Medical imaging, mainly Doppler ultrasound, plays an important role to detect and grade these. Colour Doppler ultrasound exams are routinely performed at 24–48 h, on the 7th day, the first and third month after transplantation. MDCT and MR images are acquired based on the Doppler ultrasound (DUS) findings, even in the absence of abnormal liver function. As vascular complications appear early after surgery, DUS should be performed by experience personnel. Diagnostic angiography is seldom performed. This pictorial review illustrates the key imaging findings of vascular complications in patients with liver transplantation: hepatic artery complications (such as thrombosis, stenosis of the anastomosis and pseudoaneurysms), portal vein abnormalities (such as occlusion and stenosis) and hepatic veins and/or inferior vena cava flow changes (Budd-Chiari syndrome).

Diagnostic Performance of Multidetector Computerized Tomography in the Detection of Abdominal Complications Early and Late After Liver Transplantation: A 10-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Multidetector computerized tomography (MDCT) is considered to be a fast noninvasive diagnostic technique for the evaluation of postoperative complications in patients with liver transplantation (LT). However, its role has not been fully established in the diagnosis for detecting complications after liver transplantation. The aim of this work was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MDCT for detecting abdominal complications in the early and late periods after LT.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 75 patients who had undergone LT from March 2006 to January 2010, followed by MDCT from March 2006 to November 2017. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the timing after LT: within the first 3 months (early period) or ≥3 months after LT (late period). We evaluated vascular, biliary, and other complications on MDCT. Angiography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography were used as reference standards.

RESULTS

We initially found 77 complications in 45 patients (60.0%) with the use of MDCT. After comparison with the reference standards, 83 complications were diagnosed in 49 patients (65.3%). Forty-seven complications (34 vascular, 10 biliary, 3 other complications) were diagnosed in 33 patients (44.0%) during the early period, and 36 complications (6 vascular, 20 biliary, 10 other complications) were detected in 27 patients (36.0%) in the late period. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT for diagnosing overall complications were, respectively, 93.6%, 90.2%, and 92.0% in the early period (for vascular complications: 97.1%, 92.6%, and 94.3%,; for biliary complications: 80.0%, 100%, and 97.7%) and 77.8%, 98.1%, and 89.8% in the late period (for vascular complications: 83.3%, 100%, and 98.9%; for biliary complications: 65.0%, 98.6%, and 90.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although MDCT in the late period should be interpreted with caution in patients with suspected biliary complication, MDCT is a reliable diagnostic technique for the identification of early and late abdominal complications after LT.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation: Assessment with MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging at 3T device

PURPOSE

Our study was aimed to assess the diagnostic value of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and MR imaging at 3 T device when evaluating biliary adverse events after liver transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 384 MR examinations in 232 liver transplant subjects with suspected biliary complications (impaired liver function tests and/or biliary abnormalities on ultrasound) were performed at 3 T device (GE-DISCOVERY MR750; GE Healthcare). After the acquisition of axial 3D dual-echo T1-weighted images and T2-weighted sequences (propeller and SS-FSE), MRCP was performed through coronal thin-slab 3D-FRFSE and coronal oblique thick-slab SSFSE T2w sequences. DW-MRI of the liver was performed using an axial spin-echo echo-planar sequence with multiple b values (150, 500, 1000, 1500 s/mm²) in all diffusion directions. Contrast-enhanced MRCP was performed in 25/232 patients. All MR images were blindly evaluated by two experienced abdominal radiologists in consensus to determine the presence of biliary complications, whose final diagnosis was based on direct cholangiography, surgery and integrating clinical follow-up with ultrasound and/or MRI findings.

RESULTS

In 113 patients no biliary abnormality was observed. The remaining 119 subjects were affected by one or more of the following complications: non-anastomotic strictures including typical ischemic-type biliary lesions (n = 67), anastomotic strictures (n = 34), ampullary dysfunction (n = 4), anastomotic leakage (n = 4), stones, sludge and casts (n = 65), vanishing bile duct (n = 1). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of the reviewers for the detection of all types of biliary complications were 99%, 96%, 95%, 99% and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MR cholangiopancreatography and MR imaging at 3 T device are extremely reliable for detecting biliary complications after liver transplantation.