Imaging cellularity in benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: Utility of the “target sign” by diffusion weighted imaging

MR Neurography of the Lumbosacral Plexus: Technique and Disease Patterns

The lumbosacral plexus (LSP) comprises a complex network of nerves supplying the pelvis and lower extremities and may be affected by a wide range of diseases. Lumbosacral plexopathy can be challenging to diagnose due to overlapping clinical presentations and difficulty performing electrodiagnostic testing of the deep pelvic structures. MRI-more specifically, MR neurography (MRN)-can readily depict most LSP segments. MRN techniques, preferably performed at 3.0 T, continue to evolve, with most protocols including two-dimensional and optionally three-dimensional, heavily T2-weighted fat-suppressed sequences. This article provides technical tips for optimizing LSP MRN, as well as an overview of various LSP-related pathologic conditions, with accompanying illustrative examples. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article. See the invited commentary by Chhabra in this issue.

Imaging of Peripheral Nerves: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Peripheral nerve imaging provides information that can be critical to the diagnosis, staging, and management of peripheral neuropathies. MRI and ultrasound are the imaging modalities of choice for clinical evaluation of the peripheral nerves given their high soft-tissue contrast and high resolution, respectively. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes MRI- and ultrasound-based techniques for peripheral nerve imaging; highlights considerations for imaging in the settings of trauma, entrapment syndromes, diffuse inflammatory neuropathies, and tumor; and discusses image-guided nerve interventions, focusing on nerve blocks and ablation.

A neuromuscular clinician's guide to magnetic resonance neurography

Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is increasingly used in clinical practice for the evaluation of patients with a wide spectrum of peripheral nerve disorders. This review article discusses the technical aspects of MRN highlighting the core sequences performed for clinical care. A robust, high-resolution, heavily T2-weighted fluid-sensitive sequence performed on a 3.0 Tesla magnet system remains the main workhorse MRN sequence. In specific clinical scenarios, adjunct techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging can be added to a protocol for disease characterization. In addition, gadolinium-based contrast material can also be administered for the purposes of image optimization (suppress adjacent vascular signal) and disease characterization. Technical modifications to field of view and planes of imaging can be made based on the clinical question and discussion with the radiologist(s). On fluid-sensitive MRN sequences, a normal peripheral nerve exhibits iso- to minimally hyperintense signal relative to skeletal muscle with a predictable trajectory, preserved "fascicular" architecture, and tapered caliber from proximal to distal. Peripheral nerve abnormalities on MRN include alterations in signal, caliber, architecture, diffusion characteristics as well as enhancement and provide information regarding the underlying etiology. Although some MRN findings including nerve hyperintensity and long-segmental enlargement are nonspecific, there are certain diagnoses that can be made with high certainty based on imaging including benign peripheral nerve tumors, high-grade peripheral nerve injury, and intraneural ganglia. The purpose of this article is to familiarize a neuromuscular clinician with fundamentals of MRN acquisition and interpretation to facilitate communication with the neuromuscular radiologist and optimize patient care.

Novel MRI signs for differentiating neurogenic and non-neurogenic peripheral nerve Tumors: Insights from Contrast-Enhanced magnetic resonance neurography

OBJECTS

To investigate the specific manifestations of neurogenic and non-neurogenic tumors involving peripheral nerves on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (CE-MRN) and explore the potential of CE-MRN in aiding differential diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with neurogenic tumors and 23 with non-neurogenic tumors involving peripheral nerves were enrolled in this study. Both routine MRI and CE-MRN scanning were performed on all subjects. The location, pattern of involvement, classical MRI signs, and novel CE-MRN signs of nerve involvement were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The novel CE-MRN signs included "Enhanced target sign", "Nerve effacing sign", "Nerve wrapping sign", "Nerve compressing sign", "Nerve tail sign", and morphological changes of nerves. Diagnostic confidence in identifying nerve involvement and lesion conspicuity were assessed and compared between routine MRI and CE-MRN.

RESULTS

The majority of neurogenic tumors were schwannoma (79.3 %) and involved a single nerve (75.9 %), whereas the majority of non-neurogenic tumors were malignant tumors (78.3 %) and involved multiple nerves (78.3 %) (P < 0.001). In terms of classical MRI signs, neurogenic tumors exhibited a significantly higher incidence of the "Tail sign" (75.9 % vs 13 %), "Dumbbell sign" (31 % vs 4.3 %), "Target sign" (51.7 % vs 8.7 %), and "Split fat sign" (55.2 % vs 4.3 %), while showing a lower incidence of the "Effacement of fat plane" (3.4 % vs 60.9 %) compared to non-neurogenic tumors (all p < 0.05). Regarding novel CE-MRN signs, neurogenic tumors demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of the "Enhanced target sign" (65.6 % vs 13 %) and the "Nerve tail sign" (100 % vs 13 %), while exhibiting a lower incidence of the "Nerve effacing sign" (0 % vs 52.2 %) and the "Nerve wrapping sign" (0 % vs 17.4 %) compared to non-neurogenic tumors (all p < 0.05). CE-MRN yielded significantly higher diagnostic confidence scores (2.87 ± 0.35 vs 1.75 ± 0.84), but lower lesion conspicuity scores (2.35 ± 0.71 vs 2.92 ± 0.27) compared to routine MRI (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CE-MRN is a valuable imaging modality for the identification of tumor-related peripheral nerve involvement, as it offers supplementary indicators and enhances diagnostic confidence.

Imaging of Peripheral Intraneural Tumors: A Comprehensive Review for Radiologists

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Intraneural tumors (INTs) pose a diagnostic challenge, owing to their varied origins within nerve fascicles and their wide spectrum, which includes both benign and malignant forms. Accurate diagnosis and management of these tumors depends upon the skills of the radiologist in identifying key imaging features and correlating them with the patient's clinical symptoms and examination findings.

METHODS

This comprehensive review systematically analyzes the various imaging features in the diagnosis of intraneural tumors, ranging from basic MR to advanced MR imaging techniques such as MR neurography (MRN), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.

RESULTS

The article emphasizes the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions using characteristic MRI features, such as the "target sign" and "split-fat sign" for tumor characterization. The role of advanced multiparametric MRI in improving biopsy planning, guiding surgical mapping, and enhancing post-treatment monitoring is also highlighted. The review also underlines the importance of common diagnostic pitfalls and highlights the need for a multi-disciplinary approach to achieve an accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment strategy, and post-therapy surveillance planning.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review, we illustrate the main imaging findings of intraneural tumors, focusing on specific MR imaging features that are crucial for an accurate diagnosis and the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.

Discrimination of benign, atypical, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1 - intraindividual comparison of positron emission computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

To intraindividually compare the diagnostic performance of positron emission computed tomography (F-18-FDG-PET/CT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in a non-inferiority design for the discrimination of peripheral nerve sheath tumours as benign (BPNST), atypical (ANF), or malignant (MPNST) in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1).

RESULTS

In this prospective single-centre study, thirty-four NF1 patients (18 male; 30 ± 11 years) underwent F-18-FDG-PET/CT and multi-b-value DW-MRI (11 b-values 0 - 800 s/mm²) at 3T. Sixty-six lesions corresponding to 39 BPNST, 11 ANF, and 16 MPNST were evaluated. Two radiologists independently assessed the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean/min) as well as the ADC in areas of lowest signal intensity in each lesion (ADCdark). The AUCs of DW-MRI and F-18-FDG-PET/CT were compared to determine whether the ADC is non-inferior to SUVmax (non-inferiority margin equal to -10%). Follow-up of ≥ 24 months (BPNST) or histopathological evaluation (MPNST + ANF) served as diagnostic reference standard. Both SUVmax and ADC parameters demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy (AUCSUVmax 94.0%; AUCADCmean/min/dark 91.6% / 90.1% / 92.5%). However, non-inferiority could not be demonstrated for any of the three ADC parameters (lower limits of the confidence intervals of the difference between the AUC of ADCmean/min/dark and SUVmax -12.9% / -14.5% / -11.6%). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for both imaging techniques (Krippendorff's alpha all > 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PET/CT-derived SUVmax and MRI-derived ADC allow sensitive and non-invasive differentiation of benign and (pre)-malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. Nevertheless, DW-MRI cannot be considered as non-inferior to F-18-FDG-PET/CT in this prospective single-centre study.

Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Foot and Ankle

Peripheral neuropathies of the foot and ankle can be challenging to diagnose clinically due to concomitant traumatic and nontraumatic or degenerative orthopedic conditions. Although clinical history, physical examination, and electrodiagnostic testing comprised of nerve conduction velocities and electromyography are used primarily for the identification and classification of peripheral nerve disorders, MR neurography (MRN) can be used to visualize the peripheral nerves as well as the skeletal muscles of the foot and ankle for primary neurogenic pathology and skeletal muscle denervation effect. Proper knowledge of the anatomy and pathophysiology of peripheral nerves is important for an MRN interpretation.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features for Differentiating Low-Grade and High-Grade Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings for differentiating low-grade and high-grade malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs).

METHODS

This study included 31 patients (onset age range, 19-83 years; mean onset age, 57 years; 9 men and 22 women) with 36 histopathologically proven MPNSTs (7 low-grade MPNSTs and 29 high-grade MPNSTs) who underwent preoperative MRI between December 2007 and October 2022. Quantitative and qualitative MRI findings were retrospectively evaluated and compared between the 2 subtypes.

RESULTS

The maximum tumor diameter (106.1 ± 64.0 vs 54.9 ± 19.8 mm, P = 0.032) and tumor-to-muscle signal intensity ratio (SIR) of fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images (2.69 ± 1.40 vs 1.62 ± 0.40, P = 0.005) were significantly higher in high-grade MPNSTs than in low-grade MPNSTs. The receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the tumor-to-muscle SIR of fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images exhibited the highest area under the curve value (0.88), followed by the maximum tumor diameter (0.76). The sensitivity and specificity of the tumor-to-muscle SIR of fat-suppressed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images for diagnosing high-grade MPNST at an optimal SIR threshold of greater than 1.73 were 90% and 83%, respectively. However, other MRI findings showed no significant differences between the 2 subtypes ( P = 0.16-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the MRI findings of low-grade and high-grade MPNST overlapped considerably, the maximum tumor diameter and degree of contrast enhancement can be used to differentiate low-grade MPNST from high-grade MPNST.

MRI features of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors: how do sporadic and syndromic tumors differ?

OBJECTIVES

To compare MRI features of sporadic and neurofibromatosis syndrome-related localized schwannomas and neurofibromas.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, our pathology database was searched for "neurofibroma" or "schwannoma" from 2014 to 2019. Exclusion criteria were lack of available MRI and intradural or plexiform tumors. Qualitative and quantitative anatomic (location, size, relationship to nerve, signal, muscle denervation) and functional (arterial enhancement, apparent diffusion-weighted coefficient) MRI features of sporadic and syndrome-related tumors were compared. Statistical significance was assumed for p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients with 64 schwannomas (sporadic: 42 (65.6%) v. syndrome-related: 22 (34.4%)) and 19 neurofibromas (sporadic: 7 (36.8%) v. syndrome-related: 12 (41.7%)) were included. Only signal heterogeneity (T2W p=0.001, post-contrast p=0.03) and a diffused-weighted imaging target sign (p=0.04) were more frequent with schwannomas than neurofibromas. Sporadic schwannomas were similar in size to syndrome-related schwannomas (2.9±1.2cm vs. 3.7±3.2 cm, p = 0.6), but with greater heterogeneity (T2W p = 0.02, post-contrast p = 0.01). Sporadic neurofibromas were larger (4.6±1.5cm vs. 3.4±2.4 cm, p = 0.03) than syndrome-related neurofibromas, also with greater heterogeneity (T2W p=0.03, post-contrast p=0.04). Additional tumors along an affected nerve were only observed with syndrome-related tumors). There was no difference in apparent diffusion coefficient values or presence of early perfusion between sporadic and syndrome-related tumors (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although syndrome-related and sporadic schwannomas and neurofibromas overlap in their anatomic, diffusion and perfusion features, signal heterogeneity and presence of multiple lesions along a nerve are differentiating characteristics of syndrome-related tumors.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential in the management of musculoskeletal (MSK) tumors. This review delves into the diverse MRI modalities, focusing on anatomical, functional, and metabolic sequences that provide essential biomarkers for tumor detection, characterization, disease extent determination, and assessment of treatment response. MRI's multimodal capabilities offer a range of biomarkers that enhance MSK tumor evaluation, aiding in better patient management.

Discrimination of benign, atypical, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1 using diffusion-weighted MRI

Background

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is associated with the development of benign (BPNST) and malignant (MPNST) peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Recently described atypical neurofibromas (ANF) are considered pre-malignant precursor lesions to MPNSTs. Previous studies indicate that diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) can reliably discriminate MPNSTs from BPNSTs. We therefore investigated the diagnostic accuracy of DW-MRI for the discrimination of benign, atypical, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Methods

In this prospective explorative single-center phase II diagnostic study, 44 NF1 patients (23 male; 30.1 ± 11.8 years) underwent DW-MRI (b-values 0-800 s/mm²) at 3T. Two radiologists independently assessed mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCmean/min) in areas of largest tumor diameters and ADCdark in areas of lowest signal intensity by manual contouring of the tumor margins of 60 BPNSTs, 13 ANFs, and 21 MPNSTs. Follow-up of ≥ 24 months (BPNSTs) or histopathological evaluation (ANFs + MPNSTs) served as diagnostic reference standard. Diagnostic ADC-based cut-off values for discrimination of the three tumor groups were chosen to yield the highest possible specificity while maintaining a clinically acceptable sensitivity.

Results

ADC values of pre-malignant ANFs clustered between BPNSTs and MPNSTs. Best BPNST vs. ANF + MPNST discrimination was obtained using ADCdark at a cut-off value of 1.6 × 10-3 mm2/s (85.3% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity), corresponding to an AUC of 94.3% (95% confidence interval: 85.2-98.0). Regarding BPNST + ANF vs. MPNST, best discrimination was obtained using an ADCdark cut-off value of 1.4 × 10-3 mm2/s (83.3% sensitivity, 94.5% specificity).

Conclusions

DW-MRI using ADCdark allows specific and noninvasive discrimination of benign, atypical, and malignant nerve sheath tumors in NF1.

Society of skeletal radiology position paper - recommendations for contrast use in musculoskeletal MRI: when is non-contrast imaging enough?

The following White Paper will discuss the appropriateness of gadolinium administration in MRI for musculoskeletal indications. Musculoskeletal radiologists should consider the potential risks involved and practice the judicious use of intravenous contrast, restricting administration to cases where there is demonstrable added value. Specific nuances of when contrast is or is not recommended are discussed in detail and listed in table format. Briefly, contrast is recommended for bone and soft tissue lesions. For infection, contrast is reserved for chronic or complex cases. In rheumatology, contrast is recommended for early detection but not for advanced arthritis. Contrast is not recommended for sports injuries, routine MRI neurography, implants/hardware, or spine imaging, but is helpful in complex and post-operative cases.

Magnetic Resonance Neurography of the Foot and Ankle

Peripheral neuropathies of the foot and ankle can be challenging to diagnose clinically due to concomitant traumatic and nontraumatic or degenerative orthopedic conditions. Although clinical history, physical examination, and electrodiagnostic testing comprised of nerve conduction velocities and electromyography are used primarily for the identification and classification of peripheral nerve disorders, MR neurography (MRN) can be used to visualize the peripheral nerves as well as the skeletal muscles of the foot and ankle for primary neurogenic pathology and skeletal muscle denervation effect. Proper knowledge of the anatomy and pathophysiology of peripheral nerves is important for an MRN interpretation.

Whole Body MRI with DWI in People with NF1 and Schwannomatosis: Are Qualitative and Quantitative Imaging Features of Peripheral Lesions Comparable to Localized MRI?

PURPOSE

To compare the qualitative and quantitative features of peripheral lesions on localized (L) and whole-body (WB) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and schwannomatosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, HIPAA compliant study with twenty-seven patients (14 women, 13 men; mean age (years): 38 (3-67)) who underwent both L-MRI and WB-MRI without interval treatment. WB-MRI and L-MRI were comprised of T1-weighted, fat suppressed (FS) T2-weighted or short tau inversion recovery (STIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using b-values of 50, 400, and 800 s/mm2, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping and pre- and post-contrast FST1 sequences. Two readers recorded qualitative (T1 and T2/STIR signal intensity and heterogeneity, contrast enhancement and heterogeneity, perilesional enhancement, presence of a target sign and perilesional edema) and quantitative (size, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), ADC) features of peripheral lesions on L-MRI and WB-MRI.Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and McNemar's test were used.

RESULTS

There were 31 peripheral lesions identified in 27 subjects, (mean size: 3.1 cm (range: 1-8.1 cm) on both L-MRI and WB-MRI).There were no differences in T1 signal and heterogeneity and T2/STIR signal and heterogeneity between WB-MRI and L-MRI ((p = 0.180, 0.083, 0.317 and 0.157 respectively). There were also no differences in contrast enhancement, heterogeneity and perilesional enhancement between WB-MRI and L-MRI (p = 1.000, 0.380 and 1.000 respectively). Presence of a target sign and perilesional edema did not differ between WB-MRI and L-MRI (p = 1.000 and 0.500 respectively). Craniocaudal (CC), mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) size measurements on WB-MRI did not differ from CC, ML and AP size measurements on L-MRI (p = 0.597, 0.128 and 0.783 respectively). SNR on WB-DWI did not differ from SNR on L-DWI for b50, b400 and b800 images (p = 0.285, 0.166, and 0.974 respectively), and CNR on WB-DWI did not differ from CNR on L-DWI for b50, b400 and b800 images (p = 0.600, 0.124, and 0.787 respectively). There was no significant difference in minimum, mean and maximum ADC values between WB-DWI and L-DWI (p = 0.234, 0.481, and 0.441 respectively). Median minimum, mean and maximum ADC (×10(-3)mm(2)/s) differences between WB-DWI and L-DWI were 0.0 (range -1 to 0.7), 0.0 (range -0.5 to 0.6), and 0.1 (range -1.2 to 0.8) respectively. Relative ADC difference averages were 29.1% for minimum values, 10.1% for mean values, and 14.8% for maximum values.

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI yields qualitative and quantitative features for peripheral lesions, including DWI and ADC measurements, that are comparable to L-MRI scans. WB-DWI can be reliably used for the assessment of peripheral nerve sheath tumors, obviating the need for a repeat follow-up L-DWI acquisition.

Soft Tissue Masses of the Hand: A Review of Clinical Presentation and Imaging Features

More than 15% of all soft-tissue tumors arise in the hand. Because of the location of these tumors, even small abnormalities may be alarming to patients on presentation. Although the majority of lesions are benign and can be diagnosed solely by history and physical examination, additional imaging workup may be required to confirm a diagnosis or define anatomic extent of involvement. This paper aims to review the basic epidemiology, clinical presentation, imaging findings, and treatment options of the more common soft-tissue tumors of the hand.

Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound for peripheral nerve schwannoma

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US) diagnostic techniques have the advantages of low cost, convenient operation, and high availability.

PURPOSE

To explore the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric US in evaluating signs of peripheral schwannoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective case-control study included patients with soft-tissue masses on the limbs (divided into the schwannoma and non-schwannoma groups) between January 2017 and November 2020. US features were compared between the two groups, and receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of these features.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were included in this study; of them, 63 (38.2%) were diagnosed with schwannoma. Regular morphology (95.2% vs. 39.2%), cystic degeneration (71.4% vs. 27.5%), target sign on elastography (82.5% vs. 0), and polar blood supply sign (87.3% vs. 14.7%) were more common in schwannomas than in non-schwannoma lesions (all P < 0.001). Combining the four signs for diagnosis of schwannomas, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 95.24%, 96.08%, and 95.76%, respectively, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.987 (95% confidence interval = 0.955-0.998). Entering and exiting nerve sign was observed in 87.3% of schwannomas and in 3.0% of non-schwannoma lesions (P < 0.001), while split-fat sign was similar between the two groups (9.5% vs. 2.0%; P = 0.068).

CONCLUSION

Polar blood supply sign and target sign on elastography are specific US signs in peripheral schwannomas. The combination of two-dimensional imaging, color flow imaging, and elastography can achieve an excellent diagnostic accuracy in schwannomas.

Image-Based Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a dominant hereditary disease characterized by the mutation of the NF1 gene, affecting 1/3000 individuals worldwide. Most NF1 patients are predisposed to benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs), including cutaneous neurofibromas (CNFs) and plexiform neurofibromas (PNFs). However, 5%-10% of PNFs will ultimately develop into malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs), which have a poor prognosis. Early and reliable differentiation of benign and malignant tumors in NF1 patients is of great necessity. Pathological evaluation is the “gold standard” for a definite diagnosis, but the invasive nature of the biopsy procedure restricts it from applying as a screening tool during the decades-long follow-up of these patients. Non-invasive image-based diagnostic methods such as CT and MRI are often considered essential screening tools for multiple types of tumors. For NF1 patients’ lifelong regular follow-ups, these radiological methods are currently used for tumor evaluation. However, no consensus was established on screening the malignant transformation of benign PNSTs. Moreover, novel technologies like radiogenomics and PET-MRI have not been well evaluated and fully adopted for NF1 patients. This review summarizes current studies of different imaging methods for differentiating benign and malignant tumors in NF1. Meanwhile, we discussed the prospects of the usage of new tools such as radiogenomics and PET-MRI to distinguish MPNST from benign PNSTs more precisely. Summarizing these findings will help clarify the directions of future studies in this area and ultimately contribute to the radiology images-based clinical screening of MPNST in NF1 patients and finally improve the overall survival rates of these patients.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Nerve Tumors

Nerve tumors are uncommon soft tissue neoplasms predominantly arising from peripheral nerve sheath and Schwann cells. We review the manifestations of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors, concentrating on distinguishing imaging features of schwannomas versus neurofibromas with an emphasis on treatment implications. Nevertheless, there is often an overlap between the imaging presentation of these two conditions, making the accurate radiologic diagnosis challenging. Therefore, tissue sampling is often needed for a definitive histologic diagnosis. Treatment planning largely depends on symptoms, location of the lesion, and underlying risk factors. Three major syndromes, neurofibromatosis type 1, type 2, and schwannomatosis, predispose patients to peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs), with particular concern about the malignant subtype expression. In patients with suspected PNSTs, correlation of imaging findings with clinical findings and genetic tests is helpful for a more accurate diagnosis and disease management. Some imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography can be helpful to differentiate malignant from benign subtypes.

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of musculoskeletal tissues: incremental role over conventional MR imaging in bone, soft tissue, and nerve lesions

Diffusion-weighted imaging is increasingly becoming popular in musculoskeletal radiology for its incremental role over conventional MR imaging in the diagnostic strategy and assessment of therapeutic response of bone and soft tissue lesions. This article discusses the technical considerations of diffusion-weighted imaging, how to optimize its performance, and outlines the role of this novel imaging in the identification and characterization of musculoskeletal lesions, such as bone and soft tissue tumors, musculoskeletal infections, arthritis, myopathy, and peripheral neuropathy. The readers can use the newly learned concepts from the presented material containing illustrated case examples to enhance their conventional musculoskeletal imaging and interventional practices and optimize patient management, their prognosis, and outcomes.

Adrenal schwannoma: why should endocrinologists be aware of this uncommon tumour?

PURPOSE

Adrenal schwannomas (AS) are rare tumours arising from Schwann cells. Due to the high prevalence of adrenal incidentalomas, running into very rare adrenal tumours has become a possibility for high volume expert centres. So far, the clinical behaviour and the radiological characteristics of AS make the pre-operative diagnosis of AS extremely challenging. Due to limited information available, we wanted to summarise the main features of this tumours, in order to raise the profile of an uncommon disease.

METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE and EMBASE research to review the literature. We found 57 case reports and case series and a total of 169 cases, including 2 more cases found in our Institutions. We collected data regarding year of publication, sex, age, and, when available, clinical presentation, hormonal data, radiological features, tumour site and size, treatment, histology and follow-up.

RESULTS

We analysed and discussed the clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics of cases identified, underlying the critical aspects of assessment and management of these tumours which still remain questioned, as, currently, pathologic examination is the only way to make the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The pre-operative diagnosis of AS is more than challenging and pathologic examination is so far the only way to make a certain diagnosis. Therefore, it is important to consider also the AS in the list of possible diagnoses when faced with a large not secreting adrenal tumour, with suspicious radiological features.

PET/MRI Improves Management of Children with Cancer

Integrated PET/MRI has shown significant clinical value for staging and restaging of children with cancer by providing functional and anatomic tumor evaluation with a 1-stop imaging test and with up to 80% reduced radiation exposure compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. This article reviews clinical applications of 18F-FDG PET/MRI that are relevant for pediatric oncology, with particular attention to the value of PET/MRI for patient management. Early adopters from 4 different institutions share their insights about specific advantages of PET/MRI technology for the assessment of young children with cancer. We discuss how whole-body PET/MRI can be of value in the evaluation of certain anatomic regions, such as soft tissues and bone marrow, as well as specific PET/MRI interpretation hallmarks in pediatric patients. We highlight how whole-body PET/MRI can improve the clinical management of children with lymphoma, sarcoma, and neurofibromatosis, by reducing the number of radiologic examinations needed (and consequently the radiation exposure), without losing diagnostic accuracy. We examine how PET/MRI can help in differentiating malignant tumors versus infectious or inflammatory diseases. Future research directions toward the use of PET/MRI for treatment evaluation of patients undergoing immunotherapy and assessment of different theranostic agents are also briefly explored. Lessons learned from applications in children might also be extended to evaluations of adult patients.

3D MR Neurography

High-resolution isotropic volumetric three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) techniques enable multiplanar depiction of peripheral nerves. In addition, 3D MRN provides anatomical and functional tissue characterization of different disease conditions affecting the peripheral nerves. In this review article, we summarize clinically relevant technical considerations of 3D MRN image acquisition and review clinical applications of 3D MRN to assess peripheral nerve diseases, such as entrapments, trauma, inflammatory or infectious neuropathies, and neoplasms.

Morphology of the entering and exiting nerve as a differentiating feature of benign from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours of the brachial plexus

OBJECTIVE

To identify if morphology of the entering and exiting nerve involved by a nerve sheath tumour in the brachial plexus can help differentiate between benign (B) and malignant (M) peripheral nerve sheath tumours (PNSTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 85 patients with histologically confirmed primary PNSTs of the brachial plexus over a 12.5-year period. Clinical data and all available MRI studies were independently evaluated by 2 consultant musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to the final histopathological diagnosis assessing for maximal lesion dimension, visibility and morphology of the entering and exiting nerve, and other well-documented features of PNSTs.

RESULTS

The study included 47 males and 38 females with mean age 46.7 years (range, 8-81 years). There were 73 BPNSTs and 12 MPNSTs. The entering nerve was not identified in 5 (7%), was normal in 17 (23%), was tapered in 38 (52%) and showed lobular enlargement in 13 (18%) BPNSTs compared with 0 (0%), 0 (0%), 2 (17%) and 10 (83%) MPNSTs respectively. The exiting nerve was not identified in 5 (7%), was normal in 20 (27%), was tapered in 42 (58%) and showed lobular enlargement in 6 (8%) BPNSTs compared with 4 (33%), 0 (0%), 2 (17%) and 6 (50%) MPNSTs respectively. Increasing tumour size, entering and exiting nerve morphology and suspected MRI diagnosis were statistically significant differentiators between BPNST and MPNST (p < 0.001). IOC for nerve status was poor to fair but improved to good if normal/tapered appearance were considered together with improved specificity of 81-91% for BPNST and sensitivity of 75-83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Morphology of the adjacent nerve is a useful additional MRI feature for distinguishing BPNST from MPNST of the brachial plexus.

Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment

OBJECTIVE

To assess imaging utilization practices across clinical specialists in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) for the evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults with or without plexiform neurofibromas (PN).

METHODS

An institutional review board-exempt survey was administered to medical practitioners caring for individuals with NF1 at the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) meeting in September 2019. The survey included questions on respondent demographic data (9 questions), type of imaging obtained for asymptomatic (4 questions) and symptomatic (4 questions) people with and without PN, and utilization of diffusion-weighted imaging (2 questions).

RESULTS

Thirty practitioners participated in the survey. Most were academic neuro-oncologists at high-volume (>10 patients/week) NF1 centers. Of 30 respondents, 26 had access to whole-body MRI (WB-MRI). The most common approach to an asymptomatic person without PN was no imaging (adults: 57% [17/30]; children: 50% [15/30]), followed by a screening WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 26.7% [8/30]). The most common approach to a person with symptoms or known PN was regional MRI (adults: 90% [27/30]; children: 93% [28/30]), followed by WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 36.7% [11/30]). WB-MRI was most often obtained to evaluate a symptomatic child with PN (37% [11/30]).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 90% of practitioners indicated they would obtain a regional MRI in a symptomatic patient without known or visible PN. Otherwise, there was little consensus on imaging practices. Given the high prevalence of PN and risk of malignant conversion in this patient population, there is a need to define imaging-based guidelines for optimal clinical care and the design of future clinical trials.

A Bayesian approach for diagnostic accuracy of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) carry a dismal prognosis and require early detection and complete resection. However, MPNSTs are prone to sampling errors and biopsies or resections are cumbersome and possibly damaging in benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor (BPNST). This study aimed to systematically review and quantify the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive tests for distinguishing MPNST from BPNST.

Methods

Studies on accuracy of MRI, FDG-PET (fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography), and liquid biopsies were identified in PubMed and Embase from 2000 to 2019. Pooled accuracies were calculated using Bayesian bivariate meta-analyses. Individual level-patient data were analyzed for ideal maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) threshold on FDG-PET.

Results

Forty-three studies were selected for qualitative synthesis including data on 1875 patients and 2939 lesions. Thirty-five studies were included for meta-analyses. For MRI, the absence of target sign showed highest sensitivity (0.99, 95% CI: 0.94-1.00); ill-defined margins (0.94, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98); and perilesional edema (0.95, 95% CI: 0.83-1.00) showed highest specificity. For FDG-PET, SUV_max and tumor-to-liver ratio show similar accuracy; sensitivity 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91-0.97 and 0.93, 95% CI: 0.87-0.97, respectively, specificity 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76-0.87 and 0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86, respectively. SUV_max ≥3.5 yielded the best accuracy with a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00) and specificity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.56-0.90).

Conclusions

Biopsies may be omitted in the presence of a target sign and the absence of ill-defined margins or perilesional edema. Because of diverse radiological characteristics of MPNST, biopsies may still commonly be required. In neurofibromatosis type 1, FDG-PET scans may further reduce biopsies. Ideal SUV_max threshold is ≥3.5.

FDG PET/CT and MRI Features of Pathologically Proven Schwannomas

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the MRI and FDG PET/CT imaging features of pathologically proven schwannomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This institutional review board-approved retrospective study examined biopsy-proven schwannomas that underwent FDG PET/CT and/or MRI at our institution between January 1, 2002, and April 1, 2018. PET/CT features analyzed included SUVmax, metabolic ratios, volumetric metabolic measures, presence of calcification, and pattern of FDG activity. MRI features included T1/T2 signal, enhancement pattern, margins, perilesional edema, presence of muscular denervation, and size.

RESULTS

Ninety-five biopsy-proven schwannomas were identified (40 with both PET and MRI, 35 with PET only, and 20 with MRI only), 46 females and 49 males, average age of 57.7 ± 15.3 years. The average largest dimension was 4.6 ± 2.7 cm, the average SUVmax was 5.4 ± 2.7, and lesion SUVmax/liver SUVmean was 2.2 ± 1.2. Eleven (15%) of 75 lesions had SUVmax greater than 8.1, 26/75 (35%) had SUVmax greater than 6.1, and 14/75 (19%) had lesion SUVmax/liver SUVmean greater than 3.0. On MRI, 29/53 (55%) demonstrated internal nonenhancing areas. Twenty-eight (70%) of 40 lesions with both MRI and PET demonstrated at least 1 imaging feature concerning for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (irregular margins, internal nonenhancement, perilesional edema, heterogeneous FDG uptake, or SUVmax >8.1). Lesions with heterogeneous FDG activity had higher SUVmax (6.5 ± 0.5 vs 4.7 ± 0.4, P = 0.0031) and more frequent internal nonenhancement on MRI (P = 0.0218).

CONCLUSIONS

Schwannomas may be large, be intensely FDG avid, and demonstrate significant heterogeneity, features typically associated with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A significant proportion exhibit FDG activity above cutoff levels previously thought useful in differentiating malignant from benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Imaging of Soft Tissue Tumors

Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumors is challenging with imaging alone, including that by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. However, the accuracy of this differentiation has increased owing to the development of novel imaging technology. Detailed patient history and physical examination remain essential for differentiation between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. Moreover, measurement only of tumor size based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria is insufficient for the evaluation of response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Change in metabolic activity measured by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or dynamic contrast enhanced-derived quantitative endpoints can more accurately evaluate treatment response compared to change in tumor size. Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately evaluate essential factors in surgical planning such as vascular or bone invasion and "tail sign". Thus, imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors.

Primary marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of the cavernous sinus: a case report and review of the literature

Background

Primary lymphoma of the cavernous sinus is a rare form of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma, of which very few cases have been reported in the published literature. This report presents the MRI findings with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in an exceedingly rare primary marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZBCL) of the cavernous sinus.

Case presentation

The case in this study is a 59-year-old immunocompetent male patient with a 2-month history of right ptosis and blurred vision. Right third cranial nerve palsy and binocular diplopia were observed upon neurological examination. Preoperative brain CT showed an extra-axial enhancing mass lesion in the right cavernous sinus. On MRI, ipsilateral internal carotid arterial encasement was noted without causing stenosis of the vessel. Isointense signal on T1-weighted and T2-weighted images, homogeneous contrast enhancement, and diffusion restriction were also observed. The mean ADC value of the tumor is 0.64 × 10^–3 mm²/s (b value = 1000 s/mm²). Subtotal resection of the tumor was performed, and improvement of clinical symptoms were observed. The pathologic diagnosis of MZBCL was established by immunohistochemical examinations.

Conclusions

Primary MZBCL of the cavernous sinus is exceedingly rare, and preoperative confirmation poses a major challenge with CT and conventional MRI only. In this case, preoperative quantitative ADC value is shown to offer valuable additional information in the diagnostic process.

Diagnosis and management of primary malignant tumors in the upper extremity

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity are relatively uncommon. In many cases, they are discovered incidentally during evaluation of traumatic injuries or common ailments such as rotator cuff tendonitis or tennis elbow. Thus, it is important for all orthopedic surgeons to understand the differential diagnosis, workup, and treatment for upper extremity lesions. An appreciation of the clinical and radiographic features of primary malignant lesions aids in identifying patients that need referral to an orthopedic oncologist and a multidisciplinary team.

Imaging of non-neurogenic peripheral nerve malignancy-a case series and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency, clinico-pathologic and imaging features of malignant tumors in peripheral nerves which are of non-neurogenic origin (non-neurogenic peripheral nerve malignancy-PNM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our pathology database for malignant peripheral nerve tumors from 07/2014-07/2019 and performed a systematic review. Exclusion criteria were malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Clinico-pathologic and imaging features, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_min), and standard uptake values (SUV_max) are reported.

RESULTS

After exclusion of all neurogenic tumors (benign = 196, MPNST = 57), our search yielded 19 non-neurogenic PNMs (7%, n = 19/272), due to primary intraneural malignancy (16%, n = 3/19) and secondary perineural invasion from an adjacent malignancy (16%, n = 3/19) or metastatic disease (63%, n = 12/19). Non-neurogenic PNMs were located in the lumbosacral plexus/sciatic nerves (47%, n = 9/19), brachial plexus (32%, n = 6/19), femoral nerve (5%, n = 1/19), tibial nerve (5%, n = 1/19), ulnar nerve (5%, n = 1/19), and radial nerve (5%, n = 1/19). On MRI (n = 14/19), non-neurogenic PNM tended to be small (< 5 cm, n = 10/14), isointense to muscle on T1-W (n = 14/14), hyperintense on T2-WI (n = 12/14), with enhancement (n = 12/12), low ADC_min (0.5-0.7 × 10-3 mm²/s), and variable metabolic activity (SUV_max range 2.1-13.1). A target sign was absent (n = 14/14) and fascicular sign was rarely present (n = 3/14). Systematic review revealed 89 cases of non-neurogenic PNM.

CONCLUSION

Non-neurogenic PNMs account for 7% of PNT in our series and occur due to metastases and primary intraneural malignancy. Although non-neurogenic PNMs exhibit a non-specific MRI appearance, they lack typical signs of neurogenic tumors such as the target sign. Quantitative imaging features identified by DWI (low ADC) and F¹⁸-FDG PET/CT (high SUV) may be helpful clues to the diagnosis.

Revisiting the WHO classification system of soft tissue tumours: emphasis on advanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Part 1

The World Health Organisation (WHO) classification categorises musculoskeletal soft tissue tumours (STT) based on their similarity to normal adult tissue. The most recent WHO classification provides an updated scheme that integrates biological behaviour as a distinguishing feature in each subcategory; STTs are further subdivided as benign, intermediate (locally aggressive or rarely metastasising), and malignant. Although malignant STTs are infrequent in routine orthopaedic radiology practice, musculoskeletal radiologists must be familiar with the imaging appearance of malignant STTs and distinguish them from their benign counterparts for appropriate management. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the ideal modality for the detection, characterisation, and local staging of STT. This review will discuss the most recent updates to the WHO classification of STT that are relevant to radiologists in a routine clinical practice with MRI correlation. The utility of advanced MRI sequences such as diffusion weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced sequences, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy to provide insight into the biological behaviour of various STTs is highlighted.

Computed Tomography-Based Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Craniofacial Lesions in Neurofibromatosis Type I Patients: A Machine Learning Approach

Background: Because neurofibromatosis type I (NF1) is a cancer predisposition disease, it is important to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions, especially in the craniofacial area. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to improve effectiveness in the diagnostic performance in discriminating malignant from benign craniofacial lesions based on computed tomography (CT) using a Keras-based machine-learning model. Methods: The Keras-based machine learning technique, a neural network package in the Python language, was used to train the diagnostic model on CT datasets. Fifty NF1 patients with benign craniofacial neurofibromas and six NF1 patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) were selected as the training set. Three validation cohorts were used: validation cohort 1 (random selection of 90% of the patients in the training cohort), validation cohort 2 (an independent cohort of 9 NF1 patients with benign craniofacial neurofibromas and 11 NF1 patients with MPNST), and validation cohort 3 (eight NF1 patients with MPNST, not restricted to the craniofacial area). Sensitivity and specificity were tested using validation cohorts 1 and 2, and generalizability was evaluated using validation cohort 3. Results: A total of 59 NF1 patients with benign neurofibroma and 23 NF1 patients with MPNST were included. A Keras-based machine-learning model was successfully established using the training cohort. The accuracy was 96.99 and 100% in validation cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, discriminating NF1-related benign and malignant craniofacial lesions. However, the accuracy of this model was significantly reduced to 51.72% in the identification of MPNSTs in different body regions. Conclusion: The Keras-based machine learning technique showed the potential of robust diagnostic performance in the differentiation of craniofacial MPNSTs and benign neurofibromas in NF1 patients using CT images. However, the model has limited generalizability when applied to other body areas. With more clinical data accumulating in the model, this system may support clinical doctors in the primary screening of true MPNSTs from benign lesions in NF1 patients.

Current status and recommendations for imaging in neurofibromatosis type 1, neurofibromatosis type 2, and schwannomatosis

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis (SWN) are three clinically distinct tumor predisposition syndromes with a shared tendency to develop peripheral and central nervous system neoplasms. Disease expression and complications of NF1, NF2, and SWN are highly variable, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach to care in order to optimize outcomes. This review will discuss the imaging appearance of NF1, NF2, and SWN and highlight the important role that imaging plays in informing management decisions in people with tumors associated with these syndromes. Recent technological advances, including the role of both whole-body and localized imaging strategies, routine anatomic and advanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping, and metabolic imaging techniques (MR spectroscopy and positron emission testing) are discussed in the context of the diagnosis and management of people with NF1, NF2, and SWN based on the most up-to-date clinical imaging studies.

Imaging biomarkers for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in neurofibromatosis type 1

OBJECTIVE

To determine the utility of quantitative metrics obtained from fMRI using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mapping compared with metabolic (¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG]-PET/CT) imaging in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) for the characterization of peripheral nerve sheath tumors (PNSTs) as benign or malignant.

METHODS

This Institutional Review Board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study retrospectively reviewed imaging of 55 PNSTs in 21 patients with NF1. Imaging included anatomic (unenhanced T1, fluid-sensitive, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted), functional DWI (b = 50, 400, 800 s/mm²) and ADC mapping, magnetic resonance sequences, and FDG-PET/CT imaging. Anatomic (size), functional (minimum ADC values), and metabolic (maximum standardized uptake values [SUVmax]) imaging characteristics were recorded. ADC values were correlated with SUVmax. With histologic correlation for all malignant PNSTs (MPNSTs) or clinical or imaging stability (>12 months) for benign lesions used as reference standards, diagnostic accuracy was calculated.

RESULTS

Of 55 PNSTs, there were 19 (35%) malignant and 36 (65%) benign PNSTs. Benign PNSTs were overall smaller than MPNSTs (largest diameter 4.3 ± 1.3 vs 8.2 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, p = 0.014). Benign PNSTs had higher ADCmin (×10^-3 mm²/s) than MPNSTs (1.6 ± 0.4 vs 0.6 ± 0.2, respectively, p < 0.0001) and lower SUVmax than MPNSTs (3.2 ± 1.8 vs 8 ± 3.9, p < 0.0001, respectively). ADCmin correlated inversely with SUVmax (correlation coefficient r = -0.0.58, p < 0.0001). Maintaining a sensitivity of 100% with threshold values of ADCmin ≤1 or SUVmax >3.2, DWI yielded a specificity of 94% while FDG-PET/CT offered a specificity of 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Both quantitative metabolic imaging and functional imaging offer high sensitivity for the characterization of PNSTs in NF1; however, DWI/ADC mapping offers increased specificity and may be a more useful modality.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with NF1, MRI using DWI/ADC mapping accurately distinguishes malignant and benign PNSTs.

MRI imaging of soft tissue tumours of the foot and ankle

The majority of soft tissue lesions in the foot and ankle are benign. The aim of this review is to provide the reader with a comprehensive overview of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of the most common benign and malignant soft tissue neoplasms which occur around the foot and ankle. This should enable the reader to formulate a reasonable differential diagnosis and, most importantly, to recognise those rare aggressive lesions that require further assessment and tissue biopsy.

Nerve Tumors of the Upper Extremity

Nerve sheath tumors of the upper extremity are among the common neoplastic pathologies encountered by hand surgeons. A majority of these tumors are benign schwannomas or neurofibromas and may be associated with neurofibromatosis. Clinical signs of malignant transformation include new onset of pain and rapid growth. Imaging characteristics, such as standardized uptake value greater than 4.0 on PET scan, may aid in the diagnosis of a malignant tumor. Surgical excision, often with intrafascicular dissection with nerve preservation, is recommended treatment of benign lesions. Wide surgical excision is recommended for malignant lesions.