Deep-learning single-shot detector for automatic detection of brain metastases with the combined use of contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced computed tomography images

Developing and Evaluating Deep Learning Algorithms for Object Detection: Key Points for Achieving Superior Model Performance

In recent years, artificial intelligence, especially object detection-based deep learning in computer vision, has made significant advancements, driven by the development of computing power and the widespread use of graphic processor units. Object detection-based deep learning techniques have been applied in various fields, including the medical imaging domain, where remarkable achievements have been reported in disease detection. However, the application of deep learning does not always guarantee satisfactory performance, and researchers have been employing trial-and-error to identify the factors contributing to performance degradation and enhance their models. Moreover, due to the black-box problem, the intermediate processes of a deep learning network cannot be comprehended by humans; as a result, identifying problems in a deep learning model that exhibits poor performance can be challenging. This article highlights potential issues that may cause performance degradation at each deep learning step in the medical imaging domain and discusses factors that must be considered to improve the performance of deep learning models. Researchers who wish to begin deep learning research can reduce the required amount of trial-and-error by understanding the issues discussed in this study.

Optimizing MRI-based brain tumor classification and detection using AI: A comparative analysis of neural networks, transfer learning, data augmentation, and the cross-transformer network

Early detection and diagnosis of brain tumors are crucial to taking adequate preventive measures, as with most cancers. On the other hand, artificial intelligence (AI) has grown exponentially, even in such complex environments as medicine. Here it's proposed a framework to explore state-of-the-art deep learning architectures for brain tumor classification and detection. An own development called Cross-Transformer is also included, which consists of three scalar products that combine self-care model keys, queries, and values. Initially, we focused on the classification of three types of tumors: glioma, meningioma, and pituitary. With the Figshare brain tumor dataset was trained the InceptionResNetV2, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, Xception, ResNet50V2, VGG19, and EfficientNetB7 networks. Over 97 % of classifications were accurate in this experiment, which provided a network's performance overview. Subsequently, we focused on tumor detection using the Brain MRI Images for Brain Tumor Detection and The Cancer Genome Atlas Low-Grade Glioma database. The development encompasses learning transfer, data augmentation, as well as image acquisition sequences; T1-weighted images (T1WI), T1-weighted post-gadolinium (T1-Gd), and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR). Based on the results, using learning transfer and data augmentation increased accuracy by up to 6 %, with a p-value below the significance level of 0.05. As well, the FLAIR sequence was the most efficient for detection. As an alternative, our proposed model proved to be the most effective in terms of training time, using approximately half the time of the second fastest network.

Deep-learning 2.5-dimensional single-shot detector improves the performance of automated detection of brain metastases on contrast-enhanced CT

PURPOSE

This study aims to develop a 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) deep-learning, object detection model for the automated detection of brain metastases, into which three consecutive slices were fed as the input for the prediction in the central slice, and to compare its performance with that of an ordinary 2-dimensional (2D) model.

METHODS

We analyzed 696 brain metastases on 127 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans from 127 patients with brain metastases. The scans were randomly divided into training (n = 79), validation (n = 18), and test (n = 30) datasets. Single-shot detector (SSD) models with a feature fusion module were constructed, trained, and compared using the lesion-based sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and the number of false positives per patient at a confidence threshold of 50%.

RESULTS

The 2.5D SSD model had a significantly higher PPV (t test, p < 0.001) and a significantly smaller number of false positives (t test, p < 0.001). The sensitivities of the 2D and 2.5D models were 88.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.6-89.6%) and 88.7% (95% CI, 87.3-90.1%), respectively. The corresponding PPVs were 39.0% (95% CI, 36.5-41.4%) and 58.9% (95% CI, 55.2-62.7%), respectively. The numbers of false positives per patient were 11.9 (95% CI, 10.7-13.2) and 4.9 (95% CI, 4.2-5.7), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that 2.5D deep-learning, object detection models, which use information about the continuity between adjacent slices, may reduce false positives and improve the performance of automated detection of brain metastases compared with ordinary 2D models.