The accuracy and sensitivity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in diagnosis of recurrent cholesteatoma

Readout-Segmented Echoplanar (RESOLVE) Diffusion-Weighted Imaging on 3T MRI in Detection of Cholesteatoma-Our Experience

Background  Several research studies have demonstrated the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in detecting middle ear cholesteatomas, especially with the non-echoplanar imaging (non-EPI) DWI technique. REadout Segmentation Of Long Variable Echo trains (RESOLVE), a multishot-EPI DWI, has better spatial resolution at a thinner section acquisition with reduced image distortion compared to the single-shot-EPI DWI technique. Purpose  In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic ability of RESOLVE -DWI in middle ear cholesteatomas with surgical and histopathological support. Patients and Methods  Fifty patients with clinical suspicion of primary cholesteatoma or postoperative recurrence were subjected to routine sequences and RESOLVE-DWI on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-eight patients had unilateral disease, while 12 patients had bilateral disease. The bilateral temporal bones of 50 patients were evaluated on MRI. The results attained by RESOLVE-DWI were correlated with intraoperative and histopathological findings. Results  RESOLVE-DWI truly detected 55 of the 58 surgically proven cholesteatomas. RESOLVE-DWI could not detect three cholesteatoma lesions due to their small size and falsely diagnosed one case each of impacted wax and non-cholesteatomatous otitis media as cholesteatoma. With a 95% confidence interval, RESOLVE-DWI showed 94.8% sensitivity, 95.2% specificity, 96% positive predictive value, 93% negative predictive value, and 95% diagnostic accuracy in cholesteatoma detection. Conclusion  RESOLVE-DWI is a sensitive and specific DWI technique for detecting middle ear cholesteatoma. However, RESOLVE-DWI has limitations in the diagnosis of small (<3 mm) cholesteatomas.

The diagnostic utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and high-resolution computed tomography for cholesteatoma: A meta-analysis

Objective

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficiency of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) in guiding the diagnosis of middle ear cholesteatoma in clinical practice.

Materials and methods

Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for studies that evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of HRCT or DWI in detecting middle ear cholesteatoma. A random-effects model was used to calculate and summarize the pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios. Postoperative pathological results were considered as the diagnostic gold standard for middle ear cholesteatoma.

Results

Fourteen published articles (860 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of DWI when diagnosing cholesteatoma (regardless of type) were 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.93) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97), respectively, while those of HRCT were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.57-0.77) and 0.78 (95% CI, 0.60-0.90), respectively. Notably, the sensitivity and specificity levels of DWI were similar to those of HRCT (p = .1178 for sensitivity, p = .2144 for specificity; pair-sampled t tests). The sensitivity and specificity of DWI or HRCT for the diagnosis of primary cholesteatoma were 0.78 (95% CI, 0.65-0.88) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69-0.93), respectively, while that for recurrent cholesteatoma were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.61-0.99) and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.82-0.98), respectively.

Conclusion

DWI and HRCT have similar levels of high sensitivity and specificity in detecting various cholesteatomas. Also, the diagnostic efficiency of HRCT or DWI for recurrent cholesteatoma is identical to that of primary cholesteatoma. Therefore, HRCT may be used in clinical settings to reduce the use of DWI and save clinical resources.

Lay summary

Data on the use of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and high-resolution computed tomography in the diagnosis of cholesteatoma were obtained through a literature search. They were analyzed to guide the clinical diagnosis and treatment of cholesteatoma.

Level of evidence

NA.

Non-echo Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Detection of Recurrent or Residual Cholesteatoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of patients with suspected recurrent cholesteatoma who underwent non-echo planar imaging (non-EPI) using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with surgery as the reference standard. We searched Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane database for diagnostic test accuracy studies. The following prespecified subgroup analyses were performed: patient age, number of radiologists interpreting MRI, study design, and risk of bias. We used a bivariate model using a generalized linear mixed model to pool accuracies. Of the 460 records identified, 32 studies were included, of which 50% (16/32) were low risk of bias. The overall pooled sensitivity was 92.2% (95% CI 87.3-95.3%), and specificity was 91.7% (85.2-95.5%). The positive likelihood ratio was 11.1 (4.5-17.8), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.09 (0.04-0.13). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 130.3 (20.5-240). Heterogeneity was moderate on visual inspection of the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve. Subgroup analyses showed prospective studies reporting higher accuracies (p=0.027), which were driven by higher specificity (prospective 93.1% (88.4-96.0%) versus retrospective 81.2% (81.0-81.4%)). There was no difference in subgroups comparing patient age (p=0.693), number of radiologists interpreting MRI (p=0.503), or risk of bias (p=0.074). No publication bias was detected (p=0.98). In conclusion, non-EPI is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic test able to identify recurrent cholesteatomas of moderate to large sizes. This test can be considered a non-invasive alternative to second-look surgery.

Radiological Follow-up After the Bony Obliteration Tympanoplasty in Detecting Residual Cholesteatoma: Towards an Optimal Postoperative MR Imaging Protocol

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

There is no consensus in literature on the most optimal follow-up imaging protocol for non-echoplanar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (non-EP DW MRI) after the canal wall-up bony obliteration tympanoplasty. Clearly, no residual cholesteatoma should be missed but on the other hand, unnecessary MR controls should be avoided. The aim of this study is to evaluate the postoperative results of non-EP DW MRI after canal wall-up bony obliteration tympanoplasty surgery at our Institute and to propose an optimal postoperative MR imaging scheme based on our data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study; all 271 patients who underwent the bony obliteration tympanoplasty between January 2010 and January 2016 with follow-up at our Institute were included. A postoperative MR imaging was systematically performed at 1 year after surgery and repeated at either 5 or both 3 and 5 years after surgery, based on the preferences of the surgeon. Variables of interest were retrieved from electronic patient records.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 60 months (inter-quartile range 56-62 mo). Two hundred seventy-one patients (100%) received a 1-year MRI, 107 (39%) a 3-year MRI, and 216 (79.7%%) a 5-year MRI. Residual cholesteatoma was found in nine cases (3.3%), corresponding with an estimated residual rate at 5 years follow-up of 3.7% when using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Of these nine cases, six cases of residual cholesteatoma (66.7%) were detected at the 1-year MRI (12-14 mo postsurgery), two cases (22.2%) at the 3-year MRI (35-39 mo postsurgery), and one case (11.1%) at the 5-year MRI (51 mo postsurgery, in this patient no 3-year MRI was performed). An uncertain MRI result was found in 15 cases, presenting as relatively hyperintense lesions. However, subsequent follow-up scans did not show persistent evidence for residual disease in 14 of these 15 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A postoperative MRI scan after 1 and 5 years is essential to detect early and late residual cholesteatoma. In our cohort, 22.2% of residual cases were detected at the 3-year MRI. However, this percentage could potentially have been higher when all patients would have received a 3-year MRI. Therefore, in order to detect residual disease as soon as possible, we propose to perform an MRI scan at 1, 3, and 5 years after the bony obliteration tympanoplasty. In cases with an unclear MR result, we suggest a repeat MRI after 12 months.

MRI of middle ear cholesteatoma: The importance of observer reliance from diffusion sequences

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) in MRI has been developed as an important tool for the detection of cholesteatoma. Various DWI sequences are available. This study aims to evaluate the importance of the observer's reliance level for the detection of cholesteatoma.

METHODS

Forty patients meeting the following criteria were included in the study: (1) chronic otitis media, (2) preoperative MRI including various DWI sequences, and (3) middle-ear surgery. The MRI protocol contained the following sequences: (1) axial and (2) coronal echoplanar imaging (EPI) readout-segmented (RESOLVE) DWI with Trace acquisition and (3) coronal non-EPI half-Fourier acquired single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) DWI. Cholesteatoma diagnosis was based on standard diagnostic criteria for cholesteatoma with DWI. Additionally, the radiologists were asked to grade personal reliance on their diagnosis using a Likert-type scale from 1 = very insecure to 5 = very secure.

RESULTS

Axial and coronal RESOLVE DWI showed a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specificity of 72.2%, respectively. The mean reliance was 3.9 for axial and 3.8 for coronal images. HASTE DWI had a sensitivity/specificity of 81.8%/66.7% with the highest reliance of all evaluated sequences (4.4). Cases with a reliance level of 5 showed a sensitivity/specificity of 100% in all sequences. A reliance level of 5 was given in the axial and coronal RESOLVE DWI in 32.5% of cases and in the HASTE DWI in 57.5%.

CONCLUSION

The evaluated DWI sequences showed comparable results. The reliance level significantly improved the predictor of cholesteatoma disease with MRI techniques.

Cholesteatoma Localization Using Fused Diffusion-Weighted Images and Thin-Slice T2 Weighted Images

BACKGROUND

Fusion of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to computed tomography (CT) has been touted as a possible technique to improve cholesteatomas localization. This study set out to assess the ability of DWI images fused with thin-slice heavily T2-weighted images to similarly localize surgically-confirmed cholesteatomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was completed of consecutive patients that underwent MR temporal bone imaging (9/2011-3/2020) with both DWI and thin-slice T2-weighted imaging. Included patients underwent surgical resection of primary or recidivistic cholesteatoma after preoperative MR imaging. A neuroradiologist, who was blinded to operative and clinical notes, localized each lesion on both DWI and fused DWI-T2 images in 11 anatomic subdivisions of the temporal bone. Surgical confirmation of cholesteatoma location was used as the gold standard for comparison.

RESULTS

Of 24 included examinations, the average age at time of MR was 48.2 ± 24.7 years; 12/24 (50.0%) were female. Five of 24 had primary cholesteatoma, while the remainder had recidivistic disease. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of unfused DWI images were 52.1%, 88.9%, and 75.8%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of fused DWI-T2 images were 57.1%, 94.8%, and 81.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Fused DWI-T2 images outperformed unfused DWI images in the anatomic localization of temporal bone cholesteatomas. This method represents a potential alternative to MR-CT fusion for pre-operative cholesteatoma evaluation, and warrants future investigations. Opposed to MR-CT fusion, this method only necessitates MR sequences and removes the need for additional CT acquisition.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1662-E1667, 2021.

Novel Radiologic Approaches for Cholesteatoma Detection: Implications for Endoscopic Ear Surgery

Technological advancement in computed tomography (CT) and MRI has improved cholesteatoma detection rates considerably in the past decade. Accurately predicting disease location and extension is essential for staging, planning, and preoperative counseling, in particular in the newer approach of endoscopic ear surgery. Improved sensitivity and specificity of these radiological methods may allow the surgeon to confidently monitor patients, therefore avoiding unnecessary surgery. This article outlines recent advances in CT and MRI technology and advantages and disadvantages of the newer techniques. Emphasis on improving the feedback loop between the radiologist and surgeon will increase the accuracy of these new technologies.

Detection of Coalescent Acute Mastoiditis on MRI in Comparison with CT

Purpose

Current imaging standard for acute mastoiditis (AM) is contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), revealing inflammation-induced bone destruction, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outperforms CT in detecting intracranial infection. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of MRI with CT in detecting coalescent AM and see to which extent MRI alone would suffice to diagnose or rule out this condition.

Methods

The MR images of 32 patients with AM were retrospectively analyzed. Bone destruction was evaluated from T2 turbo spin echo (TSE) and T1 Gd magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) images. Intramastoid enhancement and diffusion restriction were evaluated subjectively and intramastoid apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured. The MRI findings were compared with contrast-enhanced CT findings of the same patients within 48 h of the MR scan.

Results

Depending on the anatomical subsite, MRI detected definite bone defects with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 54–82%. Exception was the inner cortical table where sensitivity was only 14% and specificity was 76%. Sensitivity for general coalescent mastoiditis remained 100% due to multiple coexisting lesions. The absence of intense enhancement and non-restricted diffusion had a high negative predictive value for coalescent mastoiditis: an intramastoid ADC above 1.2 × 10⁻³ mm²/s excluded coalescent mastoiditis with a negative predictive value of 92%.

Conclusion

The MRI did not miss coalescent mastoiditis but was inferior to CT in direct estimation of bone defects. When enhancement and diffusion characteristics are also considered, MRI enables dividing patients into low, intermediate and high-risk categories with respect to coalescent mastoiditis, where only the intermediate risk group is likely to benefit from additional CT.

Apparent diffusion coefficients for predicting primary cholesteatoma risk of recurrence after surgical clearance

PURPOSE

Beside the well-known accuracy of non-EPI DWI techniques and relative ADC maps in detecting cholesteatomatous tissue, ADC can also represent a useful tool for stratifying cholesteatoma risk of recurrence. Aim of this study is to test the role of ADC in determining risk of recurrence for primary middle ear cholesteatoma, proposing stratification based on pre-operative mean (mADC) and normalized (nADC) ADC values.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 60 patients with primary unilateral middle ear cholesteatoma underwent a three-years-long follow-up to assess the presence of recurrent disease after macroscopically complete excisional surgery. Baseline MRI examination mADC and nADC values in the group with early evidence of recurrent cholesteatoma were compared to the group with no evidence of recurrence by using T statistics.

RESULTS

ADC values on pre-operative MRI examination were lower in cholesteatomas with early evidence of recurrence, and statistical significance was slightly higher for nADC compared to mADC measurements. We also determined a cut-off between the two groups, proposing stratification in high-risk of recurrence cholesteatomas (mADC≤ 1000 or nADC< 1.3) and low-risk cholesteatomas (mADC>1000 or nADC≥1.3).

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values resulted discriminating in identifying cholesteatomas with higher risk of early recurrence, both for mean and normalized ADC, with optimized tissue characterization and outcome prediction.

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for local and skull base recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy

Tumor recurrence is a major cause of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment failure. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is used for a variety of cancers, but few data are available for NPC.The aim of the study was to investigate the DWI features of recurrent NPC after radiotherapy and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) thresholds for the diagnosis of recurrent NPC.This was a retrospective study of 160 patients with NPC treated by radiotherapy at the Cancer Hospital affiliated to Guangxi Medical University from May 2012 to March 2015. The patients were divided into the local recurrence (n = 39), fibrosis (n = 51), clivus recurrence (n = 22), and clivus nonrecurrence (n = 48) groups. The patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), enhanced MRI, and DWI. Receiver operating characteristics curves were used to determine sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values.ADC values were significantly different between the recurrence and fibrosis groups (P < .0001). Using ADC threshold values of 0.887 × 10 mm/s for local recurrence, the area under the curve (AUC) of DWI was 0.967 (87.2% sensitivity and 94.1% specificity), compared with 0.732 for routine MRI (71.8% sensitivity and 74.5% specificity) (P < .001). Using ADC threshold values of 1.018 × 10 mm/s for the diagnosis of clivus recurrent NPC, the AUC of DWI was 0.984 (95.5% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity) compared with 0.558 for routine MRI (63.6% sensitivity and 47.9% specificity) (P < .001).DWI has a higher diagnostic value for recurrent NPC than MRI. DWI can increase the diagnosis sensitivity and specificity of locally recurrent NPC.