Patients' and surgeons' perspectives on axillary surgery for breast cancer

Breast Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer: Indian Surgeon's Preferences and Factors Influencing Them

BACKGROUND

It is well established that disease-free survival and overall survival after breast conservation surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy are equivalent to that after mastectomy. However, in Asian countries, the rate of BCS continues to remain low. The cause may be multifactorial including the patient's choice, availability and accessibility of infrastructure, and surgeon's choice. We aimed to elucidate the Indian surgeons' perspective while choosing between BCS and mastectomy, in women oncologically eligible for BCS.

METHODS

We conducted a survey-based cross-sectional study in January-February 2021. Indian surgeons with general surgical or specialised oncosurgical training, who consented to participate were included in the study. Multinomial logistic regression was performed to assess the effect of study variables on offering mastectomy or BCS.

RESULTS

A total of 347 responses were included. The mean age of the participants was 43 ± 11 years. Sixty-three of the surgeons were in the 25-44 years age group with the majority (80%) being males. 66.4% of surgeons 'almost always' offered BCS to oncologically eligible patients. Surgeons who had undergone specialised training in oncosurgery or breast conservation surgery were 35 times more likely to offer BCS (p < 0.01). Surgeons working in hospitals with in-house radiation oncology facilities were 9 times more likely to offer BCS (p < 0.05). Surgeons' years of practice, age, sex and hospital setting did not influence the surgery offered.

CONCLUSION

Two-thirds of Indian surgeons preferred BCS over mastectomy. Lack of radiotherapy facilities and specialised surgical training were deterrents to offering BCS to eligible women.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-022-01601-y.

Long-term morbidity after a negative sentinel node in breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy is often underestimated. The aim of this study was to inventory arm and shoulder complaints in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients post-surgery after long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients with at least 2 years of follow-up after surgery were included in this study. Self-reported arm and shoulder morbidities were assessed using a survey. Patients (n = 126) were asked if they ever developed complaints, if these complaints were still present and whether they were ever treated for these complaints.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 55.5 months (range 25-86 months), the prevalence of the self-reported arm and shoulder complaints was 25.8% for pain, 12.0% for numbness, 6.4% for paraesthesias, 7.1% for lymphedema, 8.0% for axillary web syndrome, 26.2% for loss of strength and 19.5% for limitations in range of motion. About 38.1% of the patients were treated by a physical therapist concerning the experienced complaints after SLNB.

CONCLUSION

Up to 7 years post-surgery a considerable amount of sentinel node-negative patients still suffer from arm and shoulder complaints. These complaints affect the activities of daily living. Therefore, more research is needed regarding the value of early detection and treatment of these complaints.

Arm lymphoedema and upper limb impairments in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients: A one year follow-up study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is (1) to investigate the prevalence rate of arm lymphedema, pain, impaired shoulder range of motion, strength and shoulder function one year after a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer and (2) to determine predictive factors for these complications.

METHODS

A longitudinal study was performed. One hundred patients with a sentinel-lymph node negative breast cancer were included. All patients were measured before surgery and one year after. Arm lymphedema was measured with the perimeter, pain with the Visual Analogue Scale, shoulder range of motion with an inclinometer, strength with a handheld dynamometer and shoulder function with the Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire. Patient-, breast cancer- and treatment-related variables were recorded.

RESULTS

One year after surgery 8% of sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients had developed arm lymphedema. Fifty percent of patients had pain, 30% had an impaired shoulder range of motion, 8% had a decreased handgrip strength and 49% had an impaired shoulder function. Pain, shoulder range of motion, strength and shoulder dysfunctions changed significantly over one year (p < 0.001). Higher Body Mass Index is a predictive variable for shoulder dysfunctions one year post-SLNB.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence rate of lymphedema and other upper limb impairments may not be underestimated after SLNB. Pain, shoulder range of motion, handgrip strength and shoulder function change significantly up to one year compared to preoperative values in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients.

[Sentinel node invasion: is it necessary to perform axillary lymph node dissection? Randomized trial SERC]

Contribution of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is questioned for positive sentinel node (SN), micro-metastasis and isolated tumor cells but also for macro-metastasis. The aim of this work is to precise why a prospective randomized trial is necessary and the design of this trial. Why? For positive SN, the scientific level evidence appears insufficient for validation of ALND omission as a new standard. Rational is presented with non-sentinel node involved rate and number of NSL involved at complementary ALND, axillary recurrence rate, disease free survival rate and adjuvant treatment decision impact. How? The proposed Sentinelle Envahi et Randomisation du Curage (SERC) trial will randomly assign to observation only or complementary ALND with positive SN. The aim is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of ALND omission versus ALND.

Shoulder and arm morbidity in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review

The purpose of this study was to assess which shoulder and arm impairments are common in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients and to describe the incidence and time course of these impairments. A systematic literature search was performed using different electronic databases until October 2013. Inclusion criteria were (1) research studies that included breast cancer patients surgically treated using the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) technique, (2) sentinel node-negative patients, and (3) studies that investigated morbidities of shoulder and/or arm. The exclusion criteria were (1) reviews or case studies, (2) patients who have had a SLNB followed by an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), (3) results of ALND patients and SLNB patients were not described separately, and (4) no follow-up described. Thirty articles were included, representing 5,448 patients. Shoulder and arm impairments among sentinel node-negative patients are loss of mobility, loss of strength, pain, axillary web syndrome, and sensory disorders. Within the first month after SLNB, the morbidities with the highest incidence are decreased abduction (range 40.8-100 %), forward flexion of the shoulder (range 37-100 %), pain (range 3.4-56.6 %), and numbness (range 2-64 %). Morbidities with the highest incidence after 2 years are pain (range 5.6-51.1 %), numbness (range 5.1-51.1 %), loss of strength (range 0-57.7 %), decreased internal rotation (44.4 %), and decreased abduction (range 0-41.4 %). In conclusion, although the shoulder and arm impairments are less common after SLNB alone compared to ALND, they cannot be neglected. A considerable amount of patients still suffer from those impairments more than 2 years after surgery.

Sickness absence in relation to breast and arm symptoms shortly after breast cancer surgery

PURPOSE

To determine whether and, to what extent, breast and arm symptoms are associated with sick leave (SL) shortly after breast cancer (BC) surgery, and to investigate the associations of these symptoms and different surgical procedures with SL, adjusting for age and work posture. Women (n = 511), aged 26-63 years, who worked ≥ 75% before a BC diagnosis, were included within 12 weeks of surgery.

RESULTS

31% reported breast symptoms and 22% arm symptoms; and, of these, 47% reported both. Having strenuous work postures increased the OR for being on SL most (OR 2.60), followed by breast symptoms (OR 2.40), more extensive axillary (OR 2.24) or breast surgery (OR 2.13), and arm symptoms (OR 2.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast and arm symptoms are as strongly associated with being on SL as types of breast and/or axillary surgery. Early self-reported symptoms are important to consider in guidelines for SL and rehabilitation after BC surgery.

Comparison of mastoscopic and conventional axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: long-term results from a randomized, multicenter trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term results of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND) and conventional axillary lymph node dissection (CALND).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, a group of 1027 consecutive patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups: MALND and CALND. The median follow-up was 63 months. The primary end points of the study were operative outcomes, complication reduction, function conservation, and cosmetics. The secondary end points were disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

The mean operative blood loss in the MALND group was less than in the CALND group (P<.001). The patients who underwent MALND had less axillary pain, numbness or paresthesias, and arm swelling (P<.001). The aesthetic appearance of the axilla in the MALND group was much better than that in the CALND group (P=.001 at 6 months and P=.002 at 24 months). A significant difference was found between the 2 groups in distant metastasis (P=.04). The disease-free survival rate was 64.5% in the MALND group and 60.8% in the CALND group (P=.88). The overall survival rate was 81.7% in the MALND group and 78.6% in the CALND group (P=.95).

CONCLUSION

Compared with CALND, MALND has advantages in operative outcomes, complication reduction, function conservation, and cosmetics.

Investigation of support vector machines and Raman spectroscopy for lymph node diagnostics

This study concerns the combination of Raman spectroscopy and multivariate statistical analyses for the assessment of lymph nodes in the course of breast cancer diagnostics and staging. Axillary lymph node samples derived from breast cancer patients were measured by Raman microspectroscopy. The resulting Raman maps were pre-processed and cleaned of background noise and low intensity spectra using a novel method based on selecting spectra depending on the distribution of the mean of arbitrary units of all spectra within individual samples. The obtained dataset was used to build different types of Support Vector Machine (SVM) models, including linear, polynomial and radial basis function (RBF). All trained models were tested with an unseen independent dataset in order to allow an assessment of the predictive power of the algorithms. The best performance was achieved by the RBF SVM model, which classified 100% of the independent testing data correctly. In order to compare the SVM performance with traditional chemometric methods a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model and a partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) model were generated. The results demonstrate the enhanced performance and clinical potential of the combination of SVMs and Raman spectroscopy and the benefits of the implemented filtering.

A longitudinal comparison of arm morbidity in stage I-II breast cancer patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy, sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by completion lymph node dissection, or axillary lymph node dissection

Background

Long-term shoulder and arm function following sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may surpass that following complete axillary lymph node dissection (CLND) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We objectively examined the morbidity and compared outcomes after SLNB, SLNB + CLND, and ALND in stage I/II breast cancer patients.

Materials and Methods

Breast cancer patients who had SLNB (n = 51), SLNB + CLND (n = 55), and ALND (n = 65) were physically examined 1 day before surgery (T0), and after 6 (T1), 26 (T2), 52 (T3), and 104 (T4) weeks. Differences in 8 parameters between the affected and unaffected arms were calculated. General linear models were computed to examine time, group, and interaction effects.

Results

All outcomes changed significantly, mostly nonlinearly, over time (T0–T4). Between T1 and T4, limitations decreased in abduction (all groups); anteflexion, abduction-exorotation, abduction strength (SLNB + CLND, ALND); flexion strength (SLNB + CLND); and arm volume (SLNB, SLNB + CLND). At T4, limitations in anteflexion (SLNB, ALND), abduction (SLNB + CLND, ALND), exorotation (ALND), abduction-exorotation (all groups), and volume (SLNB + CLND, ALND) increased significantly compared with T0. The SLNB group showed an advantage in anteflexion, abduction, abduction-exorotation, and volume. Groups changed significantly but differently over time in anteflexion, abduction, abduction/exorotation, abduction strength, flexion strength, and volume. Effect sizes varied from 0.19 to 0.00.

Conclusion

Initial declines in range of motion and strength were followed by recovery, although not always to presurgery levels. Range of motion and volume outcomes were better for SLNB than ALND, but not strength. SLNB surpassed SLNB + CLND in 2 of the range of motion variables. The clinical relevance of these results is negligible.

A nomogram predictive of non-sentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a sentinel lymph node micrometastasis

PURPOSE

Predictive factors of non-sentinel lymph node (NSN) involvement at axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) have been studied in the case of sentinel node (SN) involvement, with validation of a nomogram. This nomogram is not accurate for SN micrometastasis. The purpose of our study was to determine a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of NSN involvement in breast cancer patients with a SN micrometastasis.

METHODS

We collated 909 observations of SN micrometastases with additional ALND. Characteristics of the patients, tumours and SN were analysed.

RESULTS

Involvement of SN was diagnosed 490 times (53.9%) with standard staining (HES) and 419 times solely on immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) (46.1%). NSN invasion was observed in 114 patients (12.5%), whereas 62.3% (71) had only one NSN involved and 37.7% (43) two or more NSN involved. In multivariate analysis, significant predictive factors were: tumour size (pT stage < or = 10 mm or >11 and < or = 20 or >20 mm [odds ratio (OR) 2.1 and 3.43], micrometastases detected by HES or IHC [OR 1.64], presence or absence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) [OR 1.76], tumour histological type mixed or not [OR 2.64]. The rate and probability of NSN involvement with the model are given for 24 groups, with a representation by a nomogram.

CONCLUSION

One group, corresponding to 10.1% of the patients, was associated with a risk of NSN involvement of less than 5%, and five groups, corresponding to 29.8% of the patients, were associated with a risk < or = 10%. Omission of ALND could be proposed with minimal risk for a low probability of NSN involvement.

Quality of life after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection in stage I/II breast cancer patients: a prospective longitudinal study

Background

Breast cancer patients’ quality of life (QoL) after surgery has been reported to improve significantly over time. Little is known about QoL recovery after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in comparison to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND).

Methods

175 of 195 stage I/II breast cancer patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30: one day before surgery (T0) and after 6 (T1), 26 (T2), 52 (T3) and 104 (T4) weeks. Of these, 54 patients underwent SLNB, 56 SLNB+ALND and 65 ALND. General linear models and paired T-tests between T0–T4 and T1–T4 were computed. Complications, radiotherapy and systemic therapy were added to the model.

Results

Significant time effects were found on physical, role and emotional functioning. Physical and role functioning decreased between T0 and T1. At T4, SLNB patients’ functioning had increased to their T0 level; ALND (+/– SLNB) patients’ functioning had increased, but had not improved to T0 level. Emotional functioning increased linearly between T0 and T4. At T4, emotional functioning was significantly higher in all groups as compared with T0. No significant group or interaction (time × group) effects were found. Complications and chemotherapy had a significant negative effect on role, emotional and cognitive functioning. Complications had a significant effect on social functioning also. Effect sizes varied between 0.00 and 0.06.

Conclusion

Two years post surgery, breast cancer patients’ QoL is comparable to that shortly before surgery. Women rated their emotional functioning as even better. SLNB is not associated with a better QoL than ALND. However, undergoing systemic therapy and/or experiencing complications affects QoL negatively.

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients

BACKGROUND

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is poorly defined. However, up to 20% of patients with DCIS will have invasive carcinoma; these patients require staging for axillary metastasis. The aim of this study was to identify patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS who may benefit from SLNB.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we performed SLNB on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of >2.5 cm of high-grade DCIS or DCIS when mastectomy was indicated.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients underwent surgery for high-grade DCIS, and 35 of these patients underwent SLNB. Postsurgical excision histology revealed invasive disease in 20 patients, 19 of whom had undergone SLNB. Before the adoption of SLNB in selected DCIS patients, all 20 with occult invasive disease would have required second surgery axillary staging (P < .01, chi-square test).

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB should not be performed routinely for all patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. However, selective lymphadenectomy may be a useful clinical adjuvant in selected high-risk DCIS patients.

[Sentinel node detection applied to breast cancer: 2007 update]

The technique of detection and resection of the sentinel lymph node applied to early breast cancer management aims to spare the patient with a low risk of lymph node involvement an unnecessary axillary lymphadenectomy. This innovating technique lies on the double hypothesis of an accuracy to predict non sentinel lymph node status and to induce a lower morbidity when compared with axillary lymphadenectomy. This multidisciplinary technique depends on surgeons, nuclear physicians and pathologists. In practice sentinel lymph nodes are detected thanks to two types of tracers, the Blue and the colloids marked with technetium, harvested by the surgeon guided by the blue lymphatic channel and the use of a gamma probe detection, analyzed by the pathologist according to a particular procedure with the concept of serial slices, and possibly immuno histo chemistry. The objectives of this review are to specify the state of knowledge concerning the different steps: detection, surgical resection and the pathological analysis of the sentinels lymph nodes and to focus on validated and controversial indications, and on the main ongoing trials.

Patient Outcomes After Axillary Lymph Node Dissection for Breast Cancer: Use of Postoperative Continuous Local Anesthesia Infusion

BACKGROUND

Although considered a safe surgical procedure, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is associated with postoperative numbness, paresthesias, pain, and muscle weakness. Despite meticulous surgical technique and the absence of long thoracic or thoracodorsal nerve injury, the risk of these complications are reported as great as 35% to 50%, with a subset of patients developing chronic pain syndromes.

METHODS

Female patients (n = 27) undergoing Level I-II ALND for breast cancer were recruited. After ALND, patients were randomized to three groups. Group 1 received standard axillary lymph node dissection. Patients assigned to group 2 or 3 (double-blinded) received 120 h continuous 0.9% saline solution or 0.5% bupivacaine using a catheter placed into the axilla and delivered by an elastomeric pump device. After routine postoperative care, patients were discharged with oral opioid analgesics. Twice-daily assessment of pain, sedation, and nausea were conducted using validated visual-analog scale measures. Daily and total opioid analgesic requirements after surgery were recorded.

RESULTS

Patients treated with a continuous infusion of bupivacaine experienced significantly lower pain scores (P < 0.001) during the first 5 postoperative days. Postoperative opioid analgesic requirements also were significantly decreased in the bupivacaine group, and these effects persisted until postoperative day 14 (P < 0.001). Concomitant to the observed decreases in pain and oral opioid requirements, nausea and morning sedation also were significantly reduced. There were no pump-related complications, wound infections, or postoperative axillary fluid collections.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of continuous administration of bupivicaine after ALND significantly decreases pain and opioid analgesic requirements, with concomitant decreases in nausea and sedation. This study provides encouraging evidence of the therapeutic benefits of continuous infusion of local anesthesia and may represent a valuable adjunct for surgical patients who require ALND, including those with breast cancer and melanoma.

Micrometastases in Sentinel Lymph Node in a Multicentric Study: Predictive Factors of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Involvement—Groupe Des Chirurgiens De La Federation Des Centres De Lutte Contre Le Cancer

Purpose

To determine the rate of nonsentinel lymph node (NSN) involvement at axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and predictive factors of this involvement following detection of micrometastasis in sentinel nodes (SN).

Methods

We analyzed 700 observations of SN micrometastases with additional ALND with the characteristics of the patients, tumors, and SN.

Results

Involvement of SN was diagnosed 388 times by serial sections (55.4%) with standard hemoxylin and eosin staining (HES) and 312 times solely on immunohistochemical analysis (IHC; 44.6%). The accurate size of the micrometastases was indicated in 488 cases: 301 larger than 0.2 mm (61.7%) and 187 ≤ 0.2 mm (38.3%). Ninety-four patients (13.4%) presented an NSN involvement with only one NSN involved in 62 cases (66%). Predictive factors of NSN involvement were in univariate analysis (pT stage [P < .000], menopausal status [P = .048], T stage [P = .006], grade [P = .013], lymphovascular invasion [LVI; P = .013], histologic tumor type [P = .017], and method of micrometastasis detection, by HES or IHC [P = .015]) and in multivariate analysis (pT stage ≤ or > 20 mm [odds ratio, 2.54], micrometastases detected by HES or IHC [odds ratio,1.734], presence or absence of LVI [odds ratio, 1.706]). Micrometastasis size ≤ or greater than 0.2 mm was not predictive.

Conclusion

This study confirms the value of serial sections and the vital role played by IHC in screening for small micrometastases. Omission of additional ALND may be envisaged with minimal risk for pT1a and pT1b tumors, and pT1a-b-c tumors corresponding to tubular, colloidal, or medullar cancers.

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ

AIM

To review the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in the surgical management of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

METHODS

A search was conducted of Medline and the National Library of Medicine to identify key articles concerning DCIS, SLN biopsy (SLNB) and axillary dissection. Further relevant articles were obtained from the references cited in the literature.

RESULTS

Up to 20% of patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS will be later up-staged based on an invasive component identified on the excision specimen. Quality assurance in breast screening programmes requires minimally invasive pre-operative diagnosis and also axillary sampling in the case of documented invasive disease. As an effective and validated procedure, SLNB represents a paradigm shift in the surgical management of the axilla for patients with invasive breast cancer. It remains undefined which, if any, subgroups of patients with DCIS should undergo SLNB.

CONCLUSION

Axillary lymphadenectomy is an overtreatment for patients with DCIS. Performing a SLNB during the initial procedure may avoid a second operation in some DCIS patients who are diagnosed with occult invasive disease at their definitive operation. When predictors of hidden invasive disease are clarified by further study, SLNB may be used in the management of selected high-risk DCIS patients.

Lymphoscintigraphy and triangulated body marking for morbidity reduction during sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer

Current trends in patient care include the desire for minimizing invasiveness of procedures and interventions. This aim is reflected in the increasing utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy, which results in a lower level of morbidity in breast cancer staging, in comparison to extensive conventional axillary dissection. Optimized lymphoscintigraphy with triangulated body marking is a clinical option that can further reduce morbidity, more than when a hand held gamma probe alone is utilized. Unfortunately it is often either overlooked or not fully understood, and thus not utilized. This results in the unnecessary loss of an opportunity to further reduce morbidity.

Optimized lymphoscintigraphy and triangulated body marking provides a detailed 3 dimensional map of the number and location of the sentinel nodes, available before the first incision is made. The number, location, relevance based on time/sequence of appearance of the nodes, all can influence 1) where the incision is made, 2) how extensive the dissection is, and 3) how many nodes are removed. In addition, complex patterns can arise from injections. These include prominent lymphatic channels, pseudo-sentinel nodes, echelon and reverse echelon nodes and even contamination, which are much more difficult to access with the probe only. With the detailed information provided by optimized lymphoscintigraphy and triangulated body marking, the surgeon can approach the axilla in a more enlightened fashion, in contrast to when the less informed probe only method is used. This allows for better planning, resulting in the best cosmetic effect and less trauma to the tissues, further reducing morbidity while maintaining adequate sampling of the sentinel node(s).

Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer

This study is the first large prospective RCT of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) compared with standard axillary treatment (level I-III axillary lymph node dissection or four node sampling), which includes comprehensive and repeated quality of life (QOL) assessments over 18 months. Patients (n = 829) completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B+4) and the Spielberger State/Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) at baseline (pre-surgery) and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-surgery. There were significant differences between treatment groups favouring the SNB group throughout the 18 months assessment. Patients in the standard treatment group showed a greater decline in Trial Outcome Index (TOI) scores (physical well-being, functional well-being and breast cancer concerns subscales in FACT-B+4) and recovered more slowly than patients in the SNB group (p < 0.01). The change in total FACT-B+4 scores (measuring global QOL) closely resembled the TOI results. 18 months post-surgery approximately twice as many patients in the standard group compared with the SNB group reported substantial arm swelling (14% versus 7%) (p = 0.002) or numbness (19% versus 8.7%) (p < 0.001). Despite the uncertainty about undergoing a relatively new procedure and the possible need for further surgery, there was no evidence of increased anxiety amongst patients randomised to SNB (p > 0.05). For 6 months post-surgery younger patients reported less favourable QOL scores (p < 0.001) and greater levels of anxiety (p < 0.01). In view of the benefits regarding arm functioning and quality of life, the data from this randomised study support the use of SNB in patients with clinically node negative breast cancer.