Identification of sentinel nodes in patients with colon cancer

Lymphatic Mapping in Colon Cancer Depending on Injection Time and Tracing Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Designed Studies

An optimized lymph node yield leads to better survival in colon cancer, but extended lymphadenectomy is not associated with survival benefits. Lymphatic mapping shows several colon cancers feature aberrant drainage pathways inducing local recurrence when not resected. Currently, different protocols exist for lymphatic mapping procedures. This meta-analysis assessed which protocol has the best capacity to detect tumor-draining and possibly metastatic lymph nodes. A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, including prospective trials with in vivo tracer application. The risk of bias was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Traced lymph nodes, total resected lymph nodes, and aberrant drainage detection rate were analyzed. Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 42 searched for aberrant drainage. While a preoperative tracer injection significantly increased the traced lymph node rates compared to intraoperative tracing (30.1% (15.4, 47.3) vs. 14.1% (11.9, 16.5), p = 0.03), no effect was shown for the tracer used (p = 0.740) or the application sites comparing submucosal and subserosal injection (22.9% (14.1, 33.1) vs. 14.3% (12.1, 16.8), p = 0.07). Preoperative tracer injection resulted in a significantly higher rate of detected aberrant lymph nodes compared to intraoperative injection (26.3% [95% CI 11.5, 44.0] vs. 2.5% [95% CI 0.8, 4.7], p < 0.001). Analyzing 112 individual patient datasets from eight studies revealed a significant impact on aberrant drainage detection for injection timing, favoring preoperative over intraoperative injection (OR 0.050 [95% CI 0.010-0.176], p < 0.001) while indocyanine green presented itself as the superior tracer (OR 0.127 [95% CI 0.018-0.528], p = 0.012). Optimized lymphatic mapping techniques result in significantly higher detection of aberrant lymphatic drainage patterns and thus enable a personalized approach to reducing local recurrence.

Practice patterns about the role of palliation in veterinary surgical oncology

Whether surgical palliative therapy is appropriate for oncologic veterinary patients is an increasing concern as pet age increases because of improved care. In this study, an online survey (available for 30 days), comprising 100 questions with structured response options, was administered to 492 diplomates of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS). The survey queried the technical, ethical, social, medical, and financial aspects of surgical palliative therapy for oncologic veterinary patients. Responses were received from 155 ECVS diplomates (31.5%, n = 155/492). Palliative surgery was a relatively common intervention in veterinary oncology, with 50% of respondents (n = 77.5/155) indicating that 75%-100% of oncological surgeries performed were palliative. The presence of metastasis was judged as a key determinant when deciding to perform palliative oncological surgery by 41% of the respondents (n = 63.5/155). The survey revealed that the most commonly performed procedures in palliative oncological surgery were marginal resection, debulking, and amputation. In contrast to human medicine, palliative limb-sparing surgery, stent placement, and embolization were rarely used in veterinary settings, mainly because of a general lack of expertise among veterinarians, elevated costs, and recourse to euthanasia. Taken together, the survey results highlight the need for appropriate guidelines in the field of oncological surgery. To establish general guidelines and direct veterinarians towards the most appropriate judgement, understanding how and what veterinary surgeons manage palliative oncological surgery and how they perceive the main ethical, social, medical, and financial concerns are essential. Such guidelines will lead to better care for ailing animals and will facilitate the path to healing for owners.

Sentinel lymph node mapping for metastasis detection in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

controversy exists on the diagnostic performance of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in colorectal cancer. This study aimed to provide a more precise estimation of its clinical significance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

a systematic search of electronic databases was conducted to retrieve all relevant studies up to August 31st, 2019. Detection rate, sensitivity, and upstaging rate were pooled together, and a subgroup analysis was performed to identify factors that affect diagnostic performance. The prognostic value of upstaging was also explored.

RESULTS

sixty-eight studies were eligible and included. The pooled SLN detection rate was 0.93 (95 % CI, 0.91-0.94), with a significant higher rate in colon cancer or in studies including more than 100 patients. The overall sensitivity of the SLN procedure in colorectal cancer was 0.72 (95 % CI, 0.67-0.77). The tracers used were found to influence sensitivity. A mean weighted upstaging of 0.22 (95 % CI, 0.18-0.25) was identified. True upstaging, defined as micro-metastases, was 14 %. Upstaged patients were associated with worse overall survival (OS) when compared with node-negative patients (HR = 2.60, 95 % CI, 0.16-4.63). In addition, upstaged patients had a lower 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate than node-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

based on the results of the present meta-analysis, the SLN mapping procedure should focus on early stage patients to refine staging, since upstaging appeared to be a prognostic factor for DFS and OS. The SLN procedure can be recommended for colorectal cancer patients in addition to conventional resection.

Phase I/II study of adjuvant immunotherapy with sentinel lymph node T lymphocytes in patients with colorectal cancer

Although the development of multi-disciplinary management has improved the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC), the prognosis of metastatic CRC patients remains poor. Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that immunotherapy with cancer vaccines and adoptive T cell transfusions may improve outcomes as an adjuvant to current standard CRC treatment. In this phase I/II study, 71 CRC patients who underwent radical surgery (stage I-III, n = 46) or palliative surgery (stage IV with non-resectable synchronous metastases, n = 25) were included. In the first part of this study, sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were intraoperatively identified in 55 patients (46 with stage I-III CRC and 9 with stage IV CRC). SLN-T lymphocytes were expanded ex vivo for a median of 28.5 days (range 23-33 days). Thereafter, a median of 153 × 10(6) cells (range 20.7-639.0 × 10(6)) were transfused. No treatment-related toxicity was observed. In the second part of this study, the stage IV patients were routinely followed. The 24-month survival rate of the SLN-T lymphocyte group was significantly higher than that of the control group: 55.6 versus 17.5% (p = 0.02). The median overall survival of the SLN-T lymphocyte and control groups was 28 and 14 months, respectively. Our study showed that adjuvant SLN-T lymphocyte immunotherapy is feasible and safe for postoperative CRC patients. Additionally, this therapy may improve the long-term survival of metastatic CRC. Further investigation of the clinical efficacy and anti-tumor immunity is warranted.

Clinical application of sentinel lymph node mapping in colon cancer: in vivo vs. ex vivo techniques

Purpose

Clinical usefulness of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in colorectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the SLN mapping technique using serial sectioning, and to compare the results between ex vivo and in vivo techniques.

Methods

From February 2011 to October 2012, 34 colon cancer patients underwent SLN mapping during surgical resection. Eleven patients were analyzed with the in vivo method, and 23 patients with the ex vivo method. Patient characteristics and results of SLN mapping were evaluated.

Results

The SLN mapping was performed in 34 patients. Mean age was 67.3 years (range, 44-81 years). Primary tumors were located in the following sites: 13 in the right colon (38.2%) and 21 in the left colon (61.8%). SLN mapping was performed successfully in 88.2% of the patients. There was no significant difference in the identification rate between the two methods (90.9% vs. 87.0%, P = 1.000). Both the mapping methods showed a low sensitivity and high rate of skip metastasis.

Conclusion

This study showed that SLN evaluation using serial sectioning could not predict the nodal status with clinically acceptable accuracy despite the high detection rate.

Ex vivo localization and immunohistochemical detection of sentinel lymph node micrometastasis in patients with colorectal cancer can upgrade tumor staging

BACKGROUND

It is not clear if sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping can improve outcomes in patients with colorectal cancers. The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic values of ex vivo sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping and immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of SLN micrometastasis in colorectal cancers.

METHODS

Colorectal cancer specimens were obtained during radical resections and the SLN was identified by injecting a 1% isosulfan blue solution submucosally and circumferentially around the tumor within 30 min after surgery. The first node to stain blue was defined as the SLN. SLNs negative by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining were further examined for micrometastasis using cytokeratin IHC.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients between 25 and 82 years of age were enrolled, including 32 males and 22 females. More than 70% of patients were T3 or above, about 86% of patients were stage II or III, and approximately 90% of patients had lesions grade II or above. Sentinel lymph nodes were detected in all 54 patients. There were 32 patients in whom no lymph node micrometastasis were detected by HE staining and 22 patients with positive lymph nodes micrometastasis detected by HE staining in non-SLNs. In contrast only 7 SLNs stained positive with HE. Using HE examination as the standard, the sensitivity, non-detection rate, and accuracy rate of SLN micrometastasis detection were 31.8% (7/22), 68.2% (15/22), and 72.2%, respectively. Micrometastasis were identified by ICH in 4 of the 32 patients with HE-negative stained lymph nodes, resulting in an upstaging rate 12.5% (4/32). The 4 patients who were upstaged consisted of 2 stage I patients and 2 stage II patients who were upstaged to stage III. Those without lymph node metastasis by HE staining who were upstaged by IHC detection of micrometastasis had a significantly poorer disease-free survival (p = 0.001) and overall survival (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Ex vivo localization and immunohistochemical detection of sentinel lymph node micrometastasis in patients with colorectal cancer can upgrade tumor staging, and may become a factor affecting prognosis and guiding treatment.

Systematic review of sentinel lymph node mapping procedure in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The clinical impact of sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy in colorectal cancer is still controversial. The aim of our study was to determine the accuracy of this procedure from published data and to identify factors that contribute to the conflicting reports.

METHODS

A systematic search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to July 2011 revealed 98 potentially eligible studies, of which 57 were analyzed including 3,934 patients (3,944 specimens).

RESULTS

The pooled SN identification rate was 90.7% (95% CI 88.2-93.3), with a significant higher identification rate in studies including more than 100 patients or studies using the ex vivo SN technique. The pooled sensitivity of the SN procedure was 69.6% (95% CI 64.7-74.6). Including the immunohistochemical findings increased the pooled sensitivity of SN procedure to 80.2% (95% CI 4.7-10.7). Subgroups with significantly higher sensitivity could be identified: ≥4 SNs versus <4 SNs (85.2 vs. 66.3%, p = 0.003), colon versus rectal cancer (77.6 vs. 65.7%, p = 0.04), early T1 or T2 versus advanced T3 or T4 carcinomas (93.4 vs. 58.8%, p = 0.01). Serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry resulted in a mean upstaging of 18.9% (range 0-50%). True upstaging defined as micrometastases (pN1mi+) rather than isolated tumor cells (pN0itc+) was 7.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

The SN procedure in colorectal cancer has an overall sensitivity of 70%, with increased sensitivity and refined staging in early-stage colon cancer. Because the ex vivo SN mapping is an easy technique it should be considered in addition to conventional resection in colon cancer.

Sentinel-lymph-node procedure in colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the validity of the sentinel-lymph-node procedure for assessment of nodal status in patients with colorectal cancer. We aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of this procedure.

METHODS

We searched Embase and PubMed databases for studies published before March 20, 2010. Eligible studies had a prospective design, a sample size of at least 20 patients, and reported the rate of sentinel-lymph-node positivity. Individual patient data were requested for localisation and T-stage stratification. A subset of reports with high methodological quality was selected and analysed.

FINDINGS

We identified 52 eligible studies, which included 3767 sentinel-lymph-node procedures (2961 [78·6%] colon and 806 [21·4%] rectal carcinomas). Most tumours 2339 (62·1%) were stage T3 or T4. 1887 (50·1%) of patients were male, 1880 (49·9%) female. Mean overall weighted-detection rate was 0·94 (95% CI 0·92-0·95), at a pooled sensitivity of 0·76 (0·72-0·80) with limited heterogeneity (χ(2)=286·08, degrees of freedom=51; p=0·003). A mean weighted upstaging of 0·15 (95% CI 0·12-0·19) was noted. Individual patient data were available from 19 studies that included 1168 patients. Analysis of these data showed no significant difference in sensitivity between colon (0·86 [95% CI 0·83-0·90]) and rectal cancer (0·82 [0·77-0·88]; p=0·23). Also, there was no dependency of sensitivity on T stage for both colon (pT1: 0·79 [95% CI 0·73-0·84], pT2: 0·76 [0·62-0·90], pT3: 0·73 [0·59-0·87], pT4: 0·73 [0·53-0·93]) and rectal cancer (T1 or T2: 0·81 [0·52-0·94] vs T3 or T4: 0·80 [0·51-0·93]). The subgroup of eight studies with high methodological quality showed a mean detection rate of 0·96 (95% CI 0·90-0·99) for colonic tumours and 0·95 (0·75-0·99) for rectal tumours, and a mean sensitivity of 0·90 (95% CI 0·86-0·93) for colonic tumours and 0·82 (0·60-0·93) for rectal tumours.

INTERPRETATION

The sentinel-lymph-node procedure shows a low sensitivity, regardless of T stage, localisation, or pathological technique. For every patient diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer without clinical evidence of lymph-node involvement or metastatic disease, this procedure in addition to conventional resection should be considered, since the prognostic information provided by this technique could be clinically significant.

FUNDING

Cancer Center Amsterdam Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Pilot study of sentinel-node-based adoptive immunotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

Background

Despite optimal surgical treatment and modern adjuvant therapies, 50% of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer die within 5 years. Immunotherapy offers an appealing complement to traditional chemotherapy, with possible long-term protection against tumor recurrences through immunological memory. We have conducted a pilot study of a novel adoptive immunotherapy, using autologous, in vitro expanded lymphocytes isolated from the tumor-draining sentinel lymph node.

Study Design

Sentinel nodes were recovered from 16 patients with disseminated or locally advanced, high-risk colorectal cancer. Single-cell suspensions of sentinel-node-acquired lymphocytes were clonally expanded in vitro in the presence of autologous tumor extract and returned as a transfusion. Patients were followed with clinical and radiological evaluations. Long-term survival was compared with traditionally treated controls.

Results

Sentinel-node-acquired CD4⁺ Th1-lymphocytes could be clonally expanded in vitro and safely administered to all 16 patients without side-effects. In four out of nine stage IV patients, complete tumor regression occurred. Median survival time in the stage IV patients (n = 9) was 2.6 years, as compared with 0.8 years in conventionally treated controls. A dose-dependent effect with regards to reduced tumor burden and long-term survival was observed.

Conclusion

Sentinel-node-based adoptive immunotherapy is feasible; the method has shown no apparent side-effects and appears to convey therapeutic antitumor effects. Further studies are justified to determine its efficacy and precise role in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Comparison of ex vivo and in vivo injection of blue dye in sentinel lymph node mapping for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The technique of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in patients with colorectal cancer varies between reports, and the optimal method has not been established. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal injection technique for SLN mapping.

METHODS

Sixty-nine consecutive patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer were enrolled. The SLNs was identified intraoperatively by subserosal blue dye injection (in vivo) or by submucosal injection after standard colectomy (ex vivo). If negative by conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining analysis, all lymph nodes, SLNs and non-SLNs, were subjected to further analysis by multi-level section and immunohistochemical examination.

RESULTS

The in vivo and ex vivo injected groups were similar in demographic character, tumor size, and histological grade. The mean number of SLNs identified was 2.3 in the in vivo group and 2.6 in the ex vivo group (p = 0.192). The detection rate of SLNs by blue dye injection was somewhat higher in the ex vivo group than in the in vivo group: 90.6 vs. 81.1% (p = 0.219). The false-negative rate was 23.5% for the in vivo group and 13.3% for the ex vivo group (p = 0.392). The upstaging rate, which was 18.5% overall, was similar in both groups (p = 0.538).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that ex vivo blue dye injection is an effective alternative to in vivo injection for identifying SLNs in patients with colorectal cancer. Because of its simplicity and applicability in routine clinical settings, further investigation of the ex vivo mapping technique is warranted.

Could lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy provide oncological providence for local resectional techniques for colon cancer? A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resectional techniques for colon cancer are undermined by their inability to determine lymph node status. This limits their application to only those lesions at the most minimal risk of lymphatic dissemination whereas their technical capacity could allow intraluminal or even transluminal address of larger lesions. Sentinel node biopsy may theoretically address this breach although the variability of its reported results for this disease is worrisome.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were interrogated back to 1999 to identify all publications concerning lymphatic mapping for colon cancer with reference cross-checking for completeness. All reports were examined from the perspective of in vivo technique accuracy selectively in early stage disease (i.e. lesions potentially within the technical capacity of endoscopic resection).

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies detailing the experiences of 3390 patients were identified. Considerable variation in patient characteristics as well as in surgical and histological quality assurances were however evident among the studies identified. In addition, considerable contamination of the studies by inclusion of rectal cancer without subgroup separation was frequent. Indeed such is the heterogeneity of the publications to date, formal meta-analysis to pool patient cohorts in order to definitively ascertain technique accuracy in those with T1 and/or T2 cancer is not possible. Although lymphatic mapping in early stage neoplasia alone has rarely been specifically studied, those studies that included examination of false negative rates identified high T3/4 patient proportions and larger tumor size as being important confounders. Under selected circumstances however the technique seems to perform sufficiently reliably to allow it prompt consideration of its use to tailor operative extent.

CONCLUSION

The specific question of whether sentinel node biopsy can augment the oncological propriety for endoscopic resective techniques (including Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery [NOTES]) cannot be definitively answered at present. Study heterogeneity may account for the variability evident in the results from different centers. Enhanced capacity (perhaps to the level necessary to consider selective avoidance of en bloc mesenteric resection) by its confinement to only early stage disease is plausible although not proven. Specific study of the technique in early stage tumors is clearly essential before proffering this approach.

Metinel node--the first lymph node draining a metastasis--contains tumor-reactive lymphocytes

Background

We previously identified tumor-reactive lymphocytes in the first lymph nodes that drain the primary tumor. In this study, we performed lymphatic mapping to investigate the possibility of finding the first lymph nodes that drain metastases, and of learning whether these lymph nodes contained tumor-reactive lymphocytes suitable for adoptive immunotherapy.

Methods

Nineteen patients were studied. The primary tumor site was colorectal cancer in seven patients, malignant melanoma in four, ovarian cancer and breast cancer in two, and one each with pancreatic cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, leiomyosarcoma, and squamous cellular cancer of the tongue. By injection of Patent blue dye or radioactive tracers around the metastases, we identified draining lymph nodes from liver metastases (n = 9), intra-abdominal local recurrences (n = 3), and regional lymph node metastases (n = 7). In six patients, a preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed.

Results

We located the first draining lymph node or nodes from metastases or local recurrences; we named them “metinel nodes.” Lymphocytes from the metinel nodes proliferated, showed clonal expansion, and produced interferon gamma (via in vitro expansions on stimulation with tumor homogenate) and interleukins, all of which demonstrate the characteristics of tumor-reactive lymphocytes. Eight of the nineteen patients received immunotherapy on the basis of tumor-reactive T cells derived from the metinel nodes.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that it is possible to locate the first lymph nodes draining subcutaneous, lymphatic, and visceral metastases, the so-called metinel nodes. Metinel node–derived lymphocytes may be used to treat disseminated solid cancer, and clinical trials should evaluate the effect of such treatment.

What’s wrong with sentinel node mapping in colon cancer?

Despite near-universal embrace of the concept and clinical relevance of lymphatic mapping for sentinel node identification and analysis for cancers of the breast and integument, the same technique has struggled to a find a role in gastrointestinal cancers in general and, perhaps, in colon cancer in particular. Despite many studies demonstrating its feasibility in malignancies of the large bowel, concern is continually aroused by the variable and often unacceptably low sensitivity rates. Additionally, many confess uncertainty as to what benefit it could ever confer to patients even if it were proven sufficiently accurate given that standard surgical resection incorporates mesenteric resection anyway. However, the huge impact sentinel node mapping has had on clinical practice in certain cancers means that each of these aspects merit careful reconsideration, from very first principles.

Lymphoscintigraphic localization of sentinel node in early colorectal cancer: results of a monocentric study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the feasibility of the sentinel node technique in early colorectal neoplasms and its overall accuracy in predicting nodal metastases.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with colon or rectal lesions or degenerate polyps not radically excised by endoscopy were included. Lymphatic mapping was performed with 99mTc labeled albumin colloid injected submucosally by an endoscopic route the afternoon before the surgical procedure. The day of the intervention, 2.5% patent blue V dye (S.A.L.F: Italy) was injected circumferentially around the tumor. A hand held gamma detecting probe (Scintiprobe m100, Pol-Hi-Tech, Italy) was employed to detect "hot" nodes, in vivo and ex vivo. All sentinel nodes were embedded separately for haematoxylin and eosin staining. No IHC or PCR techniques were employed.

RESULTS

Sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) were successfully identified in 35 out of 35 patients. Concordance between SLN and nodal status was observed in 32 out of 35 cases (91.4%); four patients (11.4%) were upstaged. Three skip nodal metastases were observed (false-negative rate: 8.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The sentinel node technique with blue dye and radiotracer seems valuable in early colorectal cancers detected by screening programs: a good organization and a learning curve are needed, as further multicentric studies.

Detection of metastatic disease with sentinel lymph node dissection in colorectal carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

In curative colorectal cancer surgery, radical lymph node dissection is essential for staging and decision-making for adjuvant treatment.

PURPOSE

The aims of the study were to analyse to what extent sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) in colorectal cancer could upstage N0 patients and how lymphatic mapping could demonstrate micrometastatic disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective study, patients were selected by CT scanning, avoiding bulky disease and distant metastasis. When standard staining (HE) was negative, micrometastases were searched for by immunohistochemistry (cytokeratin 11, CEA and Ca19-9 antibodies). Micrometastatic lymph nodes were classified N+(i).

RESULTS

Detection of sentinel lymph nodes was successful in 48 out of 52 colorectal cancer patients. Among the 44 M0 patients, 22 were N0 (i-) and 22 were N+ (13 with standard HE procedure, three were N+ (macrometastasis) with the SN as the only positive node and six patients had 1-4 micrometastatic SN (N+(i)). An overall potential upstaging of 9/44 could be considered after SLND. With a mean follow-up of 48 months survival, analysis showed that disease-specific survival of the group of six N+(i) patients was intermediate between the group of 22 N0 (i-) patients and the group of 16 N+ patients.

CONCLUSION

SLND may improve the detection of metastasis in conventionally bivalved nodes. Further studies could assess if micrometastatic disease detected in SN could be integrated into the risk factors for stage II patients in order to consider adjuvant chemotherapy.

Is sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer a future prognostic factor? A meta-analysis

The diagnostic value of sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. Prognostic factors for CRC must be detected to improve its treatment. A PubMed query (key words: colorectal cancer, sentinel node) provided 182 studies on the sentinel lymph node (SLN) for CRC, the abstracts of which were reviewed. Altogether, 48 studies dealing with the diagnostic value of SLNM were selected from PubMed, and 6 other studies were retrieved from reviews. We compared the diagnostic value of SLNM with that of conventional histopathologic examination. We used the diagnostic accuracy odds ratio (DAOR) method. Because of significant heterogeneity, we chose the random effect model (Der Simonian and Laird). Statistics were performed on 33 studies, including 1794 patients (1201 colon and 332 rectum cancers). The mean SLNM failure rate was 10%. The global sensitivity and specificity of the SLNM were, respectively, 70% and 81%. The pooled DAOR was 10.7 (95% confidence interval 7.0-16.5). That means that a patient whose SLN is invaded has 10.7 times more risk to be node-positive than an SLN-negative patient. Lymphatic mapping appears to be readily applicable to CRC. One of the main reasons for the heterogeneity is the performance of the SLNM by Saha et al., whose data had better sensitivity (90%) than those in other studies. The SLNM technique should be better standardized in future studies. Understanding the cause of false-negative SLNs (9%) is a major issue to resolve before routinely using this technique in CRC management. The prognostic implication of micrometastases found in SLNs requires further evaluation.

Sentinel lymph node mapping in colon cancer: current status

BACKGROUND

The primary role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping in colon cancer is to increase the accuracy of nodal staging by identifying those lymph nodes with the greatest potential for harbouring metastatic disease. Ultrastaging techniques aim to identify the otherwise undetected metastases. Until now, no consensus exists as to the most optimal procedure in patients with colon cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on the value of different SLN mapping techniques in patients with colon cancer was performed using the electronic search engine PubMed. Prospective studies published before 1 December 2005 were included and further articles were selected by cross-referencing. The results of different techniques using either blue dye or radiocolloid, were investigated.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 17 relevant articles. SLN mapping using blue dye was described in 15 studies. Two studies reported the results of SLN mapping using a combination of blue dye and radiocolloid. The reported results on identification rate varied between 71 and 100%. Accuracy rates were between 78 and 100%, sensitivity rates between 25 and 100% and true upstaging rates between 0 and 26%. The results were not affected by the addition of radiocolloid to blue dye.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with colon cancer remains an experimental procedure with varying results. Further evaluation may lead to a standardized technique that offers the potential for significant upstaging of stage II patients. This may have important implications as to tailor adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens in these patients.

Sentinel node lymphocytes: tumour reactive lymphocytes identified intraoperatively for the use in immunotherapy of colon cancer

The sentinel node is the first lymph node to receive lymphatic drainage from a tumour and is usually the first site of metastases. Today, the sentinel node is used for tumour staging. Here, we focus on its immunological role and investigate lymphocytic function in sentinel nodes, identified intraoperatively by peritumoural dye injection, from 15 patients with colon cancer. Tumour infiltrating lymphocytes, sentinel and nonsentinel lymph node cells and peripheral blood leukocytes were studied by flow cytometry, proliferation assays and interferon-γ secretion after activation with autologous tumour homogenate. Whereas tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes were nonresponsive in the proliferation assays, lymphocytes from sentinel nodes proliferated dose dependently and secreted interferon-γ upon stimulation with tumour homogenate. The responses were of varying magnitude and tended to be weaker in metastatic sentinel nodes. Sentinel node lymphocytes represents an enriched source of tumour reactive lymphocytes, and may be useful in future trials of adoptive immunotherapy.

Sentinel node mapping in colon carcinoma: in-vivo versus ex-vivo approach

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine if ex-vivo and in-vivo technique of lymphatic mapping for colorectal cancer (CCR) result in similar sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification and accuracy rates.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients with 32 CCR underwent in vivo SLN mapping. After completion of the colectomy, we remapped the SLN in the operative specimens from patients who had undergone successful in vivo lymphatic mapping.

RESULTS

At least one SLN was identified by in vivo approach in 32 tumours. 1.5 SLNs (1-3) and 1.8 SLNs (1-4) (p=0.24) were identified by the in vivo and the ex vivo technique, respectively. All SLNs identified by the in vivo technique were also identified by the ex vivo technique. In six cases one and in two cases two additional SLNs were identified with the ex vivo technique. Twelve percent of tumours were upstaged.

CONCLUSION

Ex vivo SLN mapping is as accurate as the in vivo technique in defining SLN and does have the ability to upstage some patients with CCR. The ex vivo technique could be used either as a primary lymphatic mapping procedure or secondarily for failed in vivo attempts at lymphatic mapping.