A pilot study of dual-isotope lymphoscintigraphy for breast sentinel node biopsy comparing intradermal and intraparenchymal injection

Prospects of perfusion contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-US) in diagnosing axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a comparison with lymphatic CE-US

Accurate diagnosis of lymph node (LN) metastasis is vital for prognosis and treatment in patients with breast cancer. Imaging 1modalities such as ultrasound (US), MRI, CT, and 18F-FDG PET/CT are used for preoperative assessment. While conventional US is commonly recommended due to its resolution and sensitivity, it has limitations such as operator subjectivity and difficulty detecting small metastases. This review shows the microanatomy of axillary LNs to enhance accurate diagnosis and the characteristics of contrast-enhanced US (CE-US), which utilizes intravascular microbubble contrast agents, making it ideal for vascular imaging. A significant focus of this review is on distinguishing between two types of CE-US techniques for axillary LN evaluation: perfusion CE-US and lymphatic CE-US. Perfusion CE-US is used to assess LN metastasis via transvenous contrast agent administration, while lymphatic CE-US is used to identify sentinel LNs and diagnose LN metastasis through percutaneous contrast agent administration. This review also highlights the need for future research to clarify the distinction between studies involving "apparently enlarged LNs" and "clinical node-negative" cases in perfusion CE-US research. Such research standardization is essential to ensure accurate diagnostic performance in various clinical studies. Future studies should aim to standardize CE-US methods for improved LN metastasis diagnosis, not only in breast cancer but also across various malignancies.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The status of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is an important factor in determining the stage of breast cancer (BC) and the surgical procedure, and also a biomarker of the BC prognosis. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for SLN metastasis.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for relevant articles published in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, OVID databases, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2023. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR; NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS in SLN metastasis. Subgroup analysis was also performed to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies with 1525 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in the diagnosis of SLN metastasis were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.92). The PLR, NLR, and DOR were 6.51 (95% CI: 4.09-10.36), 0.11 (95% CI: 0.07-0.18), and 59.43 (95% CI: 33.27-106.17), respectively, and the area under the SROC curve was determined to be 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.96), all showing excellent diagnostic value. In the subgroup analysis, percutaneous CEUS was more sensitive than intravenous CEUS in the diagnosis of SLN metastases (0.92 versus 0.82, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

CEUS, especially percutaneous CEUS, is a reliable imaging technique for diagnosing SLN metastasis and providing important information in the stage management of breast cancer.

Lymphoscintigraphy in the Time of COVID-19: Effect of Molybdenum-99 Shortage on Feasibility of Sentinel Node Mapping

Background: In the current study, we reported our experience on sentinel node mapping of breast cancer patients during the extreme shortage of Mo99-Tc99m generators using Tc-99m phytate. Methods and Results: During the period from March 7, 2019, to April 18, 2020, due to disruption of molybdenum supply chain, we used low specific activity Tc-99m pertechnetate elute (0.5-2 mCi of 99mTcO4 in 5 mL) for each kit preparation. Two or three intradermal periareolar injections were done for each patient (0.02-0.1 mCi/0.2 mL for each injection). Immediately following injection, dynamic lymphoscintigraphy was done. Surgery was done the same day of injection and the axillary sentinel node was sought using a gamma probe. Overall, 35 patients were included in the study. The specific activity of the Tc-99m elute (in 5 mL) used for kit preparation was 2 mCi/10 mg in four, 1.5 mCi/10 mg in eight, 1.25 mCi/10 mg in eight, 1 mCi/10 mg in three, 0.75 mCi/10 mg in five, and 0.5 mCi/10 mg of 99mTc-Phytate in seven patients. For the first four groups of patients, we used two 0.2 mL injections, while in the latter two groups, three 0.2 mL injections were used. At least one sentinel node was detected in all patients but three in whom axilla was involved. Conclusion: Sentinel node biopsy can be achieved with low specific activity of Tc-99m elute at the time of Mo99-Tc-99m generator shortage. If special personal protection is used, sentinel node mapping can be done in nuclear medicine departments with excellent results despite the COVID-19 pandemic and disruption of generator shipment.

Meta-analysis of aberrant lymphatic drainage in recurrent breast cancer

Background

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in recurrent breast cancer offers targeted axillary staging compared with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or no treatment. The evidence for lymphatic mapping in recurrent breast cancer is reviewed, focusing on aberrant drainage and its implications for patient management.

Methods

A meta-analysis of studies evaluating lymphatic mapping in recurrent breast cancer was performed. Outcomes included sentinel node identification, aberrant lymphatic pathways and metastatic node rates in aberrant drainage and ipsilateral axilla. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.) were estimated using fixed-effect analyses, or random-effects analyses in the event of statistically significant heterogeneity.

Results

Seven studies reported data on lymphatic mapping in 1053 patients with recurrent breast cancer. The intraoperative sentinel node identification rate was 59·6 (95 per cent c.i. 56·7 to 62·6) per cent, and significantly greater when the original axillary surgery was SNB compared with ALND (OR 2·97, 95 per cent c.i. 1·66 to 5·32). The rate of aberrant lymphatic drainage identification was 25·7 (23·0 to 28·3) per cent, and significantly greater when the original axillary surgery was ALND (OR 0·27, 0·19 to 0·38). The metastatic sentinel node rate was 10·4 (8·6 to 12·3) per cent, and a significantly greater metastatic nodal burden was identified in the ipsilateral axilla (OR 6·31, 1·03 to 38·79).

Conclusion

Lymphatic mapping is feasible in recurrent breast cancer. It avoids ALND in over 50 per cent of patients who have undergone SNB, and allows the 4 per cent of patients with metastatically involved aberrant nodes to receive targeted surgical and adjuvant therapies.

Meta-analysis of superficial versus deep injection of radioactive tracer and blue dye for lymphatic mapping and detection of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for axillary staging in early breast cancer. Currently, no consensus exists on the optimal site of injection of the radioactive tracer or blue dye.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing superficial and deep injections of radioactive tracer or blue dye for lymphatic mapping and SLNB was performed. The axillary and extra-axillary sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rates obtained by lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative SLNB were evaluated. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 per cent c.i. were estimated using fixed-effect analyses, or random-effects analyses if there was statistically significant heterogeneity (P < 0·050).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between superficial and deep injections of radioactive tracer for axillary SLN identification on lymphoscintigraphy (OR 1·59, 95 per cent c.i. 0·79 to 3·17), during surgery (OR 1·27, 0·60 to 2·68) and for SLN identification using blue dye (OR 1·40, 0·83 to 2·35). The rate of extra-axillary SLN identification was significantly greater when deep rather than superficial injection was used (OR 3·00, 1·92 to 4·67). The discordance rate between superficial and deep injections ranged from 4 to 73 per cent for axillary and from 0 to 61 per cent for internal mammary node mapping.

CONCLUSION

Both superficial and deep injections of radioactive tracer and blue dye are effective for axillary SLN identification. Clinical consequences of discordance rates between the two injection techniques are unclear. Deep injections are associated with significantly greater extra-axillary SLN identification; however, this may not have a significant impact on clinical management.

Imaging lymphatic system in breast cancer patients with magnetic resonance lymphangiography

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of gadolinium (Gd) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL) in breast cancer patients within a typical clinical setting, and to establish a Gd-MRL protocol and identify potential MRL biomarkers for differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes.

Materials and Methods

32 patients with unilateral breast cancer were enrolled and divided into 4 groups of 8 patients. Groups I, II, and III received 1.0, 0.5, and 0.3 ml of intradermal contrast; group IV received two 0.5 ml doses of intradermal contrast. MRL images were acquired on a 3.0 T system and evaluated independently by two radiologists for the number and size of enhancing lymph nodes, lymph node contrast uptake kinetics, lymph vessel size, and contrast enhancement patterns within lymph nodes.

Results

Group III patients had a statistically significant decrease in the total number of enhancing axillary lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels compared to all other groups. While group IV patients had a statistically significant faster time to reach the maximum peak enhancement over group I and II (by 3 minutes), there was no other statistically significant difference between imaging results between groups I, II, and IV. 27 out of 128 lymphatic vessels (21%) showed dilatation, and all patients with dilated lymphatic vessels were pathologically proven to have metastases. Using the pattern of enhancement defects as the sole criterion for identifying metastatic lymph nodes during Gd-MRL interpretation, and using histopathology as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity were estimated to be 86% and 95%, respectively.

Conclusion

Gd-MRL can adequately depict the lymphatic system, can define sentinel lymph nodes, and has the potential to differentiate between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

Sentinel node identification using microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the recommended method for surgical staging of the axilla in patients with breast cancer. Grey-scale axillary ultrasonography (US) combined with US-guided biopsy is a widely used preoperative staging procedure but has limited sensitivity. US contrast agent "microbubbles", when injected intradermally, have been shown to have the potential to enter the breast lymphatics, travel rapidly to the axilla, and visualize the putative SLNs. This review illustrates the SLN identification technique using intradermal injection of microbubbles and contrast-enhanced US. The injection method, lymphatic visualization techniques, grey-scale and contrast-enhanced US images of the putative SLNs are reviewed and exemplified.