Tumor differentiation is not a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in elderly patients with early gastric cancer

Clinicopathological features and lymph node metastasis risk in early gastric cancer with WHO criteria in China: 304 cases analysis

AIMS

The aim of this research was to identify the clinicopathological characteristics of early gastric cancer (EGC) based on the WHO criteria, and to analyze predictors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in EGC in a Chinese study population.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of 304 Chinese EGC patients, including 265 patients undergoing radical gastrectomy and 39 patients undergoing endoscopic resection. Histological features were accessed by three experienced pathologists. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were used to identify the correlation between clinicopathological features and LNM.

RESULTS

Among the 304 cases with EGC, the rate of well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma was 11.2%, significantly lower than that of Japanese and South Korean, which was 24.8% and 19.9% respectively (p<0.001 and p = 0.006), but similar to that of a Western result, which was 11.9% (p = 0.860). Among the 265 patients who underwent gastrectomy, 18.5% of the patients had LNM. Univariate analysis showed that macroscopic type, differentiation degree, invasion depth, infiltration pattern (INF), lymphovascular invasion and ulceration were related to LNM. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001, OR = 6.549), ulceration (p = 0.035, OR = 2.527) and INF c (p = 0.042, OR = 3.424) were the independent risk factors of LNM in EGC.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathological diagnosis standard of well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma in China significantly differs from that in Japan and South Korea, but is similar to western countries. LNM is more likely to occur in EGCs with lymphovascular invasion, ulceration and INF c.

Analysis of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: a single institutional experience from China

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has a strong influence on the prognosis of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). The aim of this study was to reveal the incidence of LNM and evaluate risk factors for LNM to determine the appropriate treatment for EGC in a Chinese population.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for EGC between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify clinicopathological features that were risk factors for LNM.

RESULTS

A total of 1033 patients with EGC were enrolled. Of these patients, 668 (64.7%) were men, and 365 (35.3%) were women, ranging in age from 19 to 82 years (mean 56.9 ± 10.9 years). LNM was detected in 173(16.7%) patients with EGC. Among 508 patients with mucosal cancer, 44 (8.7%) patients had LNM. In 525 patients with submucosal cancer, the incidence of LNM was 24.6% (129/525). The age, gender, tumor size, type of differentiation, Lauren classification, and lymphovascular and perineural invasion showed a significant correlation with the rate of LNM in EGC by univariate and multivariate analyses. Patients with submucosal gastric cancer had an older age, a higher proportion of proximal lesion, larger tumor size, more frequent lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and more LNM than patients with mucosal gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed a relatively high incidence of LNM in EGC, compared with Japanese and Korean cohorts. Female sex, large tumor size, undifferentiated-type, and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for LNM in EGC. Radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy should be performed in EGC patients with a high risk of LNM.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of cT1N0M1 Gastric Cancer: A Population-Based Study

Background

Distant metastasis of early gastric cancer is a rare subgroup and poorly understood. The present study is aimed at summarizing the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and management of clinical T1N0M1 (cT1N0M1) gastric cancer.

Method

Between 2004 and 2015, patients diagnosed with cT1N0M1 gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Results

A total of 1093 cT1N0M1 gastric cancer patients were identified. 49 patients (4.5%) received cancer-directed surgery, and 113 patients (10.4%) were managed with radiotherapy. Compared with the other stage IV diseases, a relatively high proportion of black population (19.9% vs. 15.8%), patients older than 60 years (63.1% vs. 57.8%), and adenocarcinoma (59.5% vs. 55.9%) were observed in the cT1N0M1 gastric cancer subgroup. Besides that, patients with cT1N0M1 had the characteristics of less poor differentiated or undifferentiated (54.3% vs. 61.7%). Patients with cT1N0M1 had worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) as compared to the other metastatic gastric cancer patients (CSS: p = 0.002, OS: p = 0.001 for log-rank test). Intriguingly, patients with cT1N0M1 had poor prognosis as compared to patients with cT1N+M1 (CSS: p = 0.015, OS: p = 0.007 for log-rank test). The 3-year and 5-year CSS for patients with cT1N0M1 were 5.7% and 4.0%, respectively. The addition of surgery resulted in improved CSS (p < 0.001 for log-rank test) while radiotherapy was not associated with CSS (p = 0.756 for log-rank test) in patients with cT1N0M1. A multivariate Cox analysis showed that surgery (HR = 0.378, 95% CI: 0.255-0.562) and patients younger than 60 (HR = 0.745, 95% CI: 0.647-0.858) years were independent protective factors for these subgroup patients.

Conclusion

Patients with cT1N0M1 gastric cancer had distinctive clinicopathological characteristics and presented poor prognosis. Knowledge of these differences contributes to guiding clinical evaluation for metastatic gastric cancer patients. More aggressive therapeutic strategy should be highlighted for this subgroup.

A Risk-Scoring Model for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer Patients: a Retrospective Study and External Validation

BACKGROUND

The possibility of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is critical to the assessment of the indication for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify the risk factors for LNM and construct a risk-scoring model for patients with early gastric cancer to guide treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective examination of reports and studies carried out January 2000 and December 2014 was conducted. A risk-scoring model for predicting LNM was developed based on the data thus collected. In addition, the model is subject to verification and validation by three institutions.

RESULTS

Of the 1029 patients, 228 patients (22%) had LNM. Multivariate analysis showed that female, depressed type, undifferentiated type, submucosa, tumor size, and lymphovascular invasion were significantly associated with LNM. An 11-point risk-scoring model was used to predict LNM risk. An area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of the risk-scoring model was plotted using the development set and the AUROC of the model [0.76 (95% CI 0.73-0.80)] to predict LNM risk. After internal and external validation, the AUROC curve for predicting LNM was 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.86), 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A risk-scoring model for predicting LNM was developed and validated. It could help with personalized care for patients with EGC.

Lymph Node Metastasis in Mucosal Gastric Cancer: Reappraisal of Expanded Indication of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Ann Surg. 2017;265:137-142. [PMID: 28009738 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001649]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate risk factors for lymph node (LN) metastasis in mucosal gastric cancer, particularly the effect of cellular differentiation, and implications for the indication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The indication of ESD has been expanded to undifferentiated-type (UD-type) gastric cancer despite risk of LN metastasis.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for pT1a stage primary gastric adenocarcinoma between 2008 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. We evaluated risk factors of LN metastasis using univariate and multivariate analyses. Pathologic slides of primary tumor and metastatic LNs from LN positive patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 1003 mucosal gastric cancer patients were enrolled, and mean number of retrieved LNs was 35.5. Eighteen (1.8%) among them had LN metastasis: 2 of the 502 differentiated-type (D-type) patients and 16 of the 501 UD-type patients (0.4% vs 3.2%, P < 0.001). Type of cellular differentiation was a significant risk factor for LN metastasis in univariate and multivariate analyses. Of 216 UD-type patients satisfying the expanded indication of ESD, 5 patients (2.3%) showed LN metastasis. Despite more aggressive clinical features such as larger size of tumor and more LN metastasis, the UD-type cancer showed a less invasion into the muscularis mucosae layer than the D-type cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Because UD-type cancer is a risk factor for LN metastasis in mucosal gastric cancer, ESD cannot be concluded to be a better option than surgery in all UD-type cancer patients. Redefinition of the expanded indication of ESD is required.

The Implications of Endoscopic Ulcer in Early Gastric Cancer: Can We Predict Clinical Behaviors from Endoscopy?

Background

The presence of ulcer in early gastric cancer (EGC) is important for the feasibility of endoscopic resection, only a few studies have examined the clinicopathological implications of endoscopic ulcer in EGC.

Objectives

To determine the role of endoscopic ulcer as a predictor of clinical behaviors in EGC.

Methods

Data of 3,270 patients with EGC who underwent surgery between January 2005 and December 2012 were reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed in relation to the presence and stage of ulcer in EGC. Based on endoscopic findings, the stage of ulcer was categorized as active, healing, or scar. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze factors associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM).

Results

2,343 (71.7%) patients had endoscopic findings of ulceration in EGC. Submucosal (SM) invasion, LNM, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion, and undifferentiated-type histology were significantly higher in ulcerative than non-ulcerative EGC. Comparison across different stages of ulcer revealed that SM invasion, LNM, and LVI were significantly associated with the active stage, and that these features exhibited significant stage-based differences, being most common at the active stage, and least common at the scar stage. The presence of endoscopic ulcer and active status of the ulcer were identified as independent risk factors for LNM.

Conclusions

Ulcerative EGC detected by endoscopy exhibited more aggressive behaviors than non-ulcerative EGC. Additionally, the endoscopic stage of ulcer may predict the clinicopathological behaviors of EGC. Therefore, the appearance of ulcers should be carefully evaluated to determine an adequate treatment strategy for EGC.

The predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer: A clinical study

Objective:

To detect the clinicopathological factors associated with lymph node metastases in early gastric cancer.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated the distribution of metastatic nodes in 198 patients with early gastric cancer treated in our hospital between May 2008 and January 2015, the clinicopathological factors including age, gender, tumor location, tumor size, macroscopic type, depth of invasion, histological type and venous invasion were studied, and the relationship between various parameters and lymph node metastases was analyzed.

Results:

In this study, one hundred and ninety-eight patients with early gastric cancer were included, and lymph node metastasis was detected in 28 patients. Univariate analysis revealed a close relationship between tumor size, depth of invasion, histological type, venous invasion, local ulceration and lymph node metastases. Multivariate analysis revealed that the five factors were independent risk factors for lymph node metastases.

Conclusion:

The clinicopathological parameters including tumor size, depth of invasion, local ulceration, histological type and venous invasion are closely correlated with lymph node metastases, should be paid high attention in early gastric cancer patients.