Inguinal lymphadenectomy for stage III melanoma: A comparative study of two surgical approaches at the onset of lymphoedema

Current surgical management for melanoma

Melanoma is a major malignant cutaneous neoplasm with a high mortality rate. In recent years, the treatment of melanoma has developed dramatically with the invention of new therapeutic agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and molecular-targeted agents. These agents are available as adjuvant therapies for postoperative patients with stage IIB, IIC, and III melanomas. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy has been studied in several global clinical trials and has demonstrated promising and favorable clinical efficacy, mainly in patients with palpable regional lymph nodes. A recent large phase III clinical trial investigating early lymph node dissection for sentinel lymph node metastases demonstrated no survival benefits. Based on these data, surgery should be reconsidered as an appropriate treatment modality for melanoma. The need for invasive surgical procedures will be reduced with the invention of effective adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies and novel clinical trial data on regional lymph node dissection. However, surgery still plays an important role in treating early-stage melanoma, accurately determining the disease stage, and effective palliative treatment for advanced melanoma. In this article, we focus on surgery for primary tumors, regional lymph nodes, and metastatic sites in an era of remarkably revolutionary drug treatments for melanoma.

Randomized Study of Wound Drainage on Early Complications After Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

The complication rate after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients is high. The aim of this randomized non-inferiority study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative wound drainage on early complications after ALND and ILND.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2018 and 2020, 104 stage III melanoma patients operated on with ALND or ILND were randomized to a study group with complete wound drain removal 3 wk after surgery or a control group with progressive drain removal. The primary end point was overall early complications graded according to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay and prognostic factors for early complications.

RESULTS

Of the 99 patients analyzed, ALND was performed in 58 patients and ILND in 41 patients. Overall, 62 patients (62.6%) developed early complications: 30 in the study group and 32 in the control group (P = 0.53). The confidence interval for the difference in proportions of patients without early complications in the two groups was -0.27 to 0.11 (P = 0.42), hence non-inferiority could be claimed. Length of hospital stay was 5 d in the study group compared to 6 in the control group (P < 0.01). ILND was associated with increased risk of early complications compared to ALND (75.6% versus 53.4%, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete drain removal 3 wk after ALN and ILND in stage III melanoma patients did not increase the risk of early complications compared to progressive drain removal.

Complications and outcomes following inguinal lymphadenectomy for malignant melanoma in an Asian population

Purpose

Melanoma is a potentially fatal cutaneous malignancy and regional lymph node (LN) metastases are the most important predictors of mortality. This study aimed to analyze clinical features and risk factors of complications associated with inguinal LN dissection (LND) to establish treatment protocols.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study (2000 to 2018) consisted of patients who underwent inguinal area sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) or LND due to malignant melanoma. Risk factors and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

One hundred patients underwent SLNB alone (n=67; patients with negative SLNB), complete LND (CLND) after positive SLNB (n=19), or radical LND without SLNB (n=14). Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates among these groups were 87.3%, 57.4%, and 61.9%, and 59.0%, 22.7%, and 28.1%, respectively. The complication rate in the SLNB alone group was lower than the other groups (22.4% vs. 47.4% and 35.7%, respectively; P=0.048). Seroma was the most common complication in the SLNB alone group (15.0%); lymphedema was most common in the CLND after SLNB group (21.1%). Multivariate analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications found the hazard ratio for body mass index >28 kg/m² was 4.376 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.243-15.401; P=0.022). The hazard ratio for LND (including CLND after SLNB and radical LND without SLNB) was 3.263 (95% CI, 1.248-8.529; P=0.016).

Conclusion

Inguinal LND is a higher risk procedure compared to SLNB and other sites for postoperative complications, irrespective of meticulous surgical techniques. More studies are needed to establish treatment protocols (e.g., observation vs. CLND after a positive SLNB result) and the risks and benefits in Asian populations.

Reduction of postoperative lymphorrhoea in patients undergoing radical lymphadenectomy for stage III melanoma: prospective study using collagen-fibrin patches

BACKGROUND

Radical lymph nodes dissection (RLND) is the standard procedure for regional control of disease in patients with metastatic melanoma (stage III). Because of its aggressiveness, lymphorrhoea is a constant problem in postoperative.

METHODS

In this prospective nonrandomized study with a retrospective analysis of data, patients undergoing surgical treatment of axillary or iliac-inguinal RLND received standard treatment plus a collagen-fibrin sealant patch (TachoSil) (N.=50) or standard treatment alone (N.=50). The first endpoint was the comparison between the treated population and the control group, in terms of persistence of drainage and average daily volume of lymphorrhoea. The second aim was to relate patients' BMI, volume of lymphorrhoea and time of drainage in the two groups.

RESULTS

In the comparison between the two groups receiving or not the treatment with collagen-fibrin patch, we found an average difference both in the volume of daily lymphorrhoea (42.91±6.61 cc) and in the persistence of drainage (9.292±1.644 days) with P value <0.0001. Besides, the collagen-fibrin patch was actually effective in reducing lymphorrhoea and time of drainage, regardless of patients' BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study confirm and support the starting thesis: TachoSil is an effective tissue sealant able to reduce lymphorrhoea and drainage removal times following a radical lymphadenectomy, independently from the BMI.

Complications following completion lymphadenectomy versus therapeutic lymphadenectomy for melanoma - A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been reported to be less morbid than lymphadenectomy for palpable disease (therapeutic lymph node dissection; TLND). The reporting of morbidity data can be heterogeneous, and hence no 'average' surgical complication rates of these procedures has been reported. This review aims to determine complications rates to inform patients undergoing surgery for metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

A systematic review of English-language literature from 2000 to 2017, reporting morbidity information about CLND and TLND for melanoma, was performed. The methodological quality of the included studies was performed using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) instrument and Detsky score. Pooled proportions of post-operative complications were constructed using a random effects statistical model.

RESULTS

After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 articles progressed to the final analysis. In relation to TLND (1627 patients), the overall incidence of surgical complications was 39.3% (95% CI 32.6-46.2); including wound infection/breakdown 25.4% (95% CI: 20.9-30.3); lymphoedema 20.9% (95% CI: 13.8-29.1); and seroma 20.4% (95% CI: 15.9-25.2). For CLND (1929 patients), the overall incidence of surgical complications was 37.2% (95% CI 27.6-47.4); including wound infection/breakdown 21.6% (95% CI: 13.8-30.6); lymphoedema 18% (95% CI: 12.5-24.2); and seroma 17.9% (95% CI: 10.3-27). The complication rate was marginally lower for CLND but not to statistical significance.

DISCUSSION

This study provides information about the incidence of complications after CLND and TLND. It can be used to counsel patients about the procedures and it sets a benchmark against which surgeons can audit their practice.

Prospective study comparing video-endoscopic radical inguinal lymph node dissection (VEILND) with open radical ILND (OILND) for penile cancer over an 8-year period

OBJECTIVE

To compare the complications and oncological outcomes between video-endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection (VEILND) and open ILND (OILND) in men with carcinoma of the penis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospectively collected institutional database was used to determine the outcomes in 42 consecutive patients undergoing ILND between 2008 and 2015 in a centre for treating penile cancer. Before 2013 all procedures were OILNDs. Since 2013 we have performed VEILND on all patients in need of ILND. The wound-related and non-wound-related complications, length of stay, and oncological safety between OILND and VEILND groups were compared. The mean duration of follow-up was 71 months for OILND and 16 months for the VEILND groups.

RESULTS

In the study period 42 patients underwent 68 ILNDs (OILND 35, VEILND 33). The patients' demographics, primary stage and grade, and indications were comparable in both groups. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. The wound complication rate was significantly lower in the VEILND group at 6% compared to 68% in the OILND group. Lymphocoele rates were similar in both the groups (27% and 20%). The VEILND group had a better or the same lymph node yield, mean number of positive lymph nodes, and lymph node density confirming oncological safety. There were no groin recurrences in either group of patients. VEILND significantly reduced the mean length of stay by 4.8 days (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

VEILND is an oncologically safe procedure with considerably low morbidity and reduced length of stay, at a mean (range) follow-up of 16 (4-35) months.