1
|
de Graaff MR, Klaase JM, den Dulk M, Te Riele WW, Hagendoorn J, van Heek NT, Vermaas M, Belt EJT, Bosscha K, Slooter GD, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Mieog JSD, Swijnenburg RJ, van Dam RM, Verhoef C, Kuhlmann K, van Duijvendijk P, Gerhards MF, Gobardhan P, van den Boezem P, Manusama ER, Grünhagen DJ, Kok NFM. Hospital variation and outcomes after repeat hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:789-799. [PMID: 38461070 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 70% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) experiences intrahepatic recurrence after initial liver resection. This study assessed outcomes and hospital variation in repeat liver resections (R-LR). METHODS This population-based study included all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM between 2014 and 2022 in the Netherlands. Overall survival (OS) was collected for patients operated on between 2014 and 2018 by linkage to the insurance database. RESULTS Data of 7479 liver resections (1391 (18.6%) repeat and 6088 (81.4%) primary) were analysed. Major morbidity and mortality were not different. Factors associated with major morbidity included ASA 3+, major liver resection, extrahepatic disease, and open surgery. Five-year OS after repeat versus primary liver resection was 42.3% versus 44.8%, P = 0.37. Factors associated with worse OS included largest CRLM >5 cm (aHR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.07-2.34, P = 0.023), >3 CRLM (aHR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00-1.75, P = 0.046), extrahepatic disease (aHR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.25-2.04, P = 0.001), positive tumour margins (aHR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.09-1.85, P = 0.009). Significant hospital variation in performance of R-LR was observed, median 18.9% (8.2% to 33.3%). CONCLUSION Significant hospital variation was observed in performance of R-LR in the Netherlands reflecting different treatment decisions upon recurrence. On a population-based level R-LR leads to satisfactory survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Eric J Th Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Gerrit D Slooter
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koert Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter van Duijvendijk
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn en Zutphen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eric R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Graaff MR, Klaase JM, Dulk MD, Buis CI, Derksen WJM, Hagendoorn J, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Hartgrink HH, Swijnenburg RJ, Vermaas M, Belt EJT, Bosscha K, Verhoef C, Olde Damink S, Kuhlmann K, Marsman HM, Ayez N, van Duijvendijk P, van den Boezem P, Manusama ER, Grünhagen DJ, Kok NFM. Outcomes of liver surgery: A decade of mandatory nationwide auditing in the Netherlands. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108264. [PMID: 38537366 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2013, the nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit (DHBA) was initiated. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in indications for and outcomes of liver surgery in the last decade. METHODS This nationwide study included all patients who underwent liver surgery for four indications, including colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and intrahepatic- and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA - pCCA) between 2014 and 2022. Trends in postoperative outcomes were evaluated separately for each indication using multilevel multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS This study included 8057 procedures for CRLM, 838 for HCC, 290 for iCCA, and 300 for pCCA. Over time, these patients had higher risk profiles (more ASA-III patients and more comorbidities). Adjusted mortality decreased over time for CRLM, HCC and iCCA, respectively aOR 0.83, 95%CI 0.75-0.92, P < 0.001; aOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.75-0.99, P = 0.045; aOR 0.40, 95%CI 0.20-0.73, P < 0.001. Failure to rescue (FTR) also decreased for these groups, respectively aOR 0.84, 95%CI 0.76-0.93, P = 0.001; aOR 0.81, 95%CI 0.68-0.97, P = 0.024; aOR 0.29, 95%CI 0.08-0.84, P = 0.021). For iCCA severe complications (aOR 0.65 95%CI 0.43-0.99, P = 0.043) also decreased. No significant outcome differences were observed in pCCA. The number of centres performing liver resections decreased from 26 to 22 between 2014 and 2022, while median annual volumes did not change (40-49, P = 0.66). CONCLUSION Over time, postoperative mortality and FTR decreased after liver surgery, despite treating higher-risk patients. The DHBA continues its focus on providing feedback and benchmark results to further enhance outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C I Buis
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter J M Derksen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Henk H Hartgrink
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Eric J Th Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Koop Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands; Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steven Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM-School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Koert Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H M Marsman
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ninos Ayez
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Peter van Duijvendijk
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn en Zutphen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Eric R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Graaff MR, Klaase JM, van Dam RM, Kuhlmann KFD, Kazemier G, Swijnenburg RJ, Elfrink AKE, Verhoef C, Mieog JS, van den Boezem PB, Gobardhan P, Rijken AM, Lips DJ, Leclercq WGK, Marsman HA, van Duijvendijk P, van der Hoeven JAB, Vermaas M, Dulk MD, Grünhagen DJ, Kok NFM. Survival of patients with colorectal liver metastases treated with and without preoperative chemotherapy: Nationwide propensity score-matched study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:106932. [PMID: 37302900 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Routine treatment with preoperative systemic chemotherapy (CTx) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains controversial due to lack of consistent evidence demonstrating associated survival benefits. This study aimed to determine the effect of preoperative CTx on overall survival (OS) compared to surgery alone and to assess hospital and oncological network variation in 5-year OS. METHODS This was a population-based study of all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM between 2014 and 2017 in the Netherlands. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), OS was compared between patients treated with and without preoperative CTx. Hospital and oncological network variation in 5-year OS corrected for case-mix factors was calculated using an observed/expected ratio. RESULTS Of 2820 patients included, 852 (30.2%) and 1968 (69.8%) patients were treated with preoperative CTx and surgery alone, respectively. After PSM, 537 patients remained in each group, median number of CRLM; 3 [IQR 2-4], median size of CRLM; 28 mm [IQR 18-44], synchronous CLRM (71.1%). Median follow-up was 80.8 months. Five-year OS rates after PSM for patients treated with and without preoperative chemotherapy were 40.2% versus 38.3% (log-rank P = 0.734). After stratification for low, medium, and high tumour burden based on the tumour burden score (TBS) OS was similar for preoperative chemotherapy vs. surgery alone (log-rank P = 0.486, P = 0.914, and P = 0.744, respectively). After correction for non-modifiable patient and tumour characteristics, no relevant hospital or oncological network variation in five-year OS was observed. CONCLUSION In patients eligible for surgical resection, preoperative chemotherapy does not provide an overall survival benefit compared to surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur K E Elfrink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cees Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Sven Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Paul Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Centre, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Daan J Lips
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Maarten Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, Ijsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raphael MJ, Karanicolas PJ. Regional Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Which Modality and When? J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2806-2817. [PMID: 35649228 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM), regional therapies leverage the unique, dual blood supply to the liver; the hepatic artery is the main blood supply for liver tumors, whereas the portal vein supplies most normal hepatic parenchyma. Infusion of cancer therapies via the hepatic artery allows selective delivery to the tumors with relative sparing of normal liver tissue and little extrahepatic exposure, thus limiting systemic side effects. There is a paucity of randomized controlled trial evidence to inform the optimal integration of regional therapies into the management of CRLM. Hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy has a potential survival benefit when used in the adjuvant setting after resection of CRLM. HAIP chemotherapy can be safely given with contemporary systemic therapies and is associated with a high objective response and rate of conversion to resectability in patients with uCRLM. Drug-eluting beads coated with irinotecan transarterial chemoembolization is associated with high objective response rates within the liver and has a well-established safety profile in patients with uCRLM. Transarterial radioembolization achieves high rates of response within the liver but is not associated with improvements in overall survival or quality of life in the first- or second-line setting for uCRLM. The best treatment approach is the one that most aligns with a given patients' values, preferences, and philosophy of care. In the first-line setting, HAIP could be offered to motivated patients who hope to achieve conversion to resectability. After progression on chemotherapy, HAIP, transarterial chemoembolization, and transarterial radioembolization are valuable treatment options to consider for patients with liver-limited or liver-predominant CRLM who seek to optimize response rates and regional control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Raphael
- Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul J Karanicolas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Frühling P, Urdzik J, Isaksson B. Chemotherapy in patients with a solitary colorectal liver metastasis – A nationwide propensity score matched study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:2188-2194. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
6
|
Short-term postoperative outcomes after liver resection in the elderly patient: a nationwide population-based study. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1506-1517. [PMID: 33926842 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection is high-risk surgery in particular in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to explore postoperative outcomes after liver resection in elderly patients. METHODS In this nationwide study, all patients who underwent liver resection for primary and secondary liver tumours in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019 were included. Age groups were composed as younger than 70 (70-), between 70 and 80 (septuagenarians), and 80 years or older (octogenarians). Proportion of liver resections per age group and 30-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality were assessed. RESULTS In total, 6587 patients were included of whom 4023 (58.9%) were younger than 70, 2135 (32.4%) were septuagenarians and 429 (6.5%) were octogenarians. The proportion of septuagenarians increased during the study period (aOR:1.06, CI:1.02-1.09, p < 0.001). Thirty-day major morbidity was higher in septuagenarians (11%) and octogenarians (12%) compared to younger patients (9%, p = 0.049). Thirty-day mortality was higher in septuagenarians (4%) and octogenarians (4%) compared to younger patients (2%, p < 0.001). Cardiopulmonary complications occurred more frequently with higher age, liver-specific complications did not. Higher age was associated with higher 30-day morbidity and 30-day mortality in multivariable logistic regression. CONCLUSION Thirty-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality are higher after liver resection in elderly patients, attributed mainly to non-surgical cardiopulmonary complications.
Collapse
|
7
|
Nationwide oncological networks for resection of colorectal liver metastases in the Netherlands: Differences and postoperative outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:435-448. [PMID: 34801321 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Widespread differences in patient demographics and disease burden between hospitals for resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) have been described. In the Netherlands, networks consisting of at least one tertiary referral centre and several regional hospitals have been established to optimize treatment and outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess variation in case-mix, and outcomes between these networks. METHODS This was a population-based study including all patients who underwent CRLM resection in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019. Variation in case-mix and outcomes between seven networks covering the whole country was evaluated. Differences in case-mix, expected 30-day major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a) and 30-day mortality between networks were assessed. RESULTS In total 5383 patients were included. Thirty-day major morbidity was 5.7% and 30-day mortality was 1.5%. Significant differences between networks were observed for Charlson Comorbidity Index, ASA 3+, previous liver resection, liver disease, preoperative MRI, preoperative chemotherapy, ≥3 CRLM, diameter of largest CRLM ≥55 mm, major resection, combined resection and ablation, rectal primary tumour, bilobar and extrahepatic disease. Uncorrected 30-day major morbidity ranged between 3.3% and 13.1% for hospitals, 30-day mortality ranged between 0.0% and 4.5%. Uncorrected 30-day major morbidity ranged between 4.4% and 6.0% for networks, 30-day mortality ranged between 0.0% and 2.5%. No negative outliers were observed after case-mix correction. CONCLUSION Variation in case-mix and outcomes are considerably smaller on a network level as compared to a hospital level. Therefore, auditing is more meaningful at a network level and collaboration of hospitals within networks should be pursued.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bolhuis K, Grosheide L, Wesdorp NJ, Komurcu A, Chapelle T, Dejong CHC, Gerhards MF, Grünhagen DJ, van Gulik TM, Huiskens J, De Jong KP, Kazemier G, Klaase JM, Liem MSL, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, Punt CJA, Swijnenburg RJ. Short-Term Outcomes of Secondary Liver Surgery for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Following Modern Induction Systemic Therapy in the Dutch CAIRO5 Trial. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e081. [PMID: 37635815 PMCID: PMC10455233 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To present short-term outcomes of liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downsized by chemotherapy plus targeted agents. Background The increase of complex hepatic resections of CRLM, technical innovations pushing boundaries of respectability, and use of intensified induction systemic regimens warrant for safety data in a homogeneous multicenter prospective cohort. Methods Patients with initially unresectable CRLM, who underwent complete resection after induction systemic regimens with doublet or triplet chemotherapy, both plus targeted therapy, were selected from the ongoing phase III CAIRO5 study (NCT02162563). Short-term outcomes and risk factors for severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien Dindo grade ≥ 3) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 173 patients underwent resection of CRLM after induction systemic therapy. The median number of metastases was 9 and 161 (93%) patients had bilobar disease. Thirty-six (20.8%) 2-stage resections and 88 (51%) major resections (>3 liver segments) were performed. Severe postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality was 15.6% and 2.9%, respectively. After multivariable analysis, blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.4], P = 0.03), major resection (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.1-7.5], P = 0.03), and triplet chemotherapy (OR 2.6 [95% CI 1.1-7.5], P = 0.03) were independently correlated with severe postoperative complications. No association was found between number of cycles of systemic therapy and severe complications (r = -0.038, P = 0.31). Conclusion In patients with initially unresectable CRLM undergoing modern induction systemic therapy and extensive liver surgery, severe postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality were 15.6% and 2.7%, respectively. Triplet chemotherapy, blood transfusion, and major resections were associated with severe postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bolhuis
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lodi Grosheide
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina J. Wesdorp
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aysun Komurcu
- The Netherlands Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cornelis H. C. Dejong
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koert P. De Jong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M. Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Mike S. L. Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen M. Rijken
- Amphia hospital, Department of Surgery, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M. Ruers
- Amphia hospital, Department of Surgery, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Department of Epidemiology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Elfrink AKE, Nieuwenhuizen S, van den Tol MP, Burgmans MC, Prevoo W, Coolsen MME, van den Boezem PB, van Delden OM, Hagendoorn J, Patijn GA, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Rijken AM, Verhoef C, Kuhlmann KFD, Ruiter SJS, Grünhagen DJ, Klaase JM, Kok NFM, Meijerink MR, Swijnenburg RJ. Hospital variation in combined liver resection and thermal ablation for colorectal liver metastases and impact on short-term postoperative outcomes: a nationwide population-based study. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:827-839. [PMID: 33218949 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Combining resection and thermal ablation can improve short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study assessed nationwide hospital variation and short-term postoperative outcomes after combined resection and ablation. METHODS In this population-based study, all CRLM patients who underwent resection in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2018 were included. After propensity score matching for age, ASA-score, Charlson-score, diameter of largest CRLM, number of CRLM and earlier resection, postoperative outcomes were compared. Postoperative complicated course (PCC) was defined as discharge after 14 days or a major complication or death within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS Of 4639 included patients, 3697 (80%) underwent resection and 942 (20%) resection and ablation. Unadjusted percentage of patients who underwent resection and ablation per hospital ranged between 4 and 44%. Hospital variation persisted after case-mix correction. After matching, 734 patients remained in each group. Hospital stay (median 6 vs. 7 days, p = 0.011), PCC (11% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.043) and 30-day mortality (0.7% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.018) were lower in the resection and ablation group. Differences faded in multivariable logistic regression due to inclusion of major hepatectomy. CONCLUSION Significant hospital variation was observed in the Netherlands. Short-term postoperative outcomes were better after combined resection and ablation, attributed to avoiding complications associated with major hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur K E Elfrink
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Sanne Nieuwenhuizen
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Petrousjka van den Tol
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Warner Prevoo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marielle M E Coolsen
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Gijs A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mike S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen M Rijken
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Medical Center, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Koert F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Simeon J S Ruiter
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Niels F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Dutch Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn R Meijerink
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Höppener DJ, Galjart B, Nierop PMH, Buisman FE, van der Stok EP, Coebergh van den Braak RRJ, van Amerongen MJ, Balachandran VP, Jarnagin WR, Kingham TP, Doukas M, Shia J, Nagtegaal ID, Vermeulen PB, Koerkamp BG, Grünhagen DJ, de Wilt JHW, D'Angelica MI, Verhoef C. Histopathological Growth Patterns and Survival After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An External Validation Study. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab026. [PMID: 34056541 PMCID: PMC8152695 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background After resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), 2 main histopathological growth patterns can be observed: a desmoplastic and a nondesmoplastic subtype. The desmoplastic subtype has been associated with superior survival. These findings require external validation. Methods An international multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients treated surgically for CRLM at 3 tertiary hospitals in the United States and the Netherlands. Determination of histopathological growth patterns was performed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of resected CRLM according to international guidelines. Patients displaying a desmoplastic histopathological phenotype (only desmoplastic growth observed) were compared with patients with a nondesmoplastic phenotype (any nondesmoplastic growth observed). Cutoff analyses on the extent of nondesmoplastic growth were performed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox analysis. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results In total 780 patients were eligible. A desmoplastic phenotype was observed in 19.1% and was associated with microsatellite instability (14.6% vs 3.6%, P = .01). Desmoplastic patients had superior 5-year OS (73.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.1% to 84.0% vs 44.2%, 95% CI = 38.9% to 50.2%, P < .001) and DFS (32.0%, 95% CI = 22.9% to 44.7% vs 14.7%, 95% CI = 11.7% to 18.6%, P < .001) compared with their nondesmoplastic counterparts. A desmoplastic phenotype was associated with an adjusted hazard ratio for death of 0.36 (95% CI = 0.23 to 0.58) and 0.50 (95% CI = 0.37 to 0.66) for cancer recurrence. Prognosis was independent of KRAS and BRAF status. The cutoff analyses found no prognostic relationship between either OS or DFS and the extent of nondesmoplastic growth observed (all P > .1). Conclusions This external validation study confirms the remarkably good prognosis after surgery for CRLM in patients with a desmoplastic phenotype. The extent of nondesmoplastic growth does not affect prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J Höppener
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Boris Galjart
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter M H Nierop
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Florian E Buisman
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eric P van der Stok
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Vinod P Balachandran
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michail Doukas
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter B Vermeulen
- Translational Cancer Research Unit (GZA Hospitals and University of Antwerp), Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Elfrink AK, van Zwet EW, Swijnenburg RJ, den Dulk M, van den Boezem PB, Mieog JSD, te Riele WW, Patijn GA, Leclercq WK, Lips DJ, Rijken AM, Verhoef C, Kuhlmann KF, Buis CI, Bosscha K, Belt EJ, Vermaas M, van Heek NT, Oosterling SJ, Torrenga H, Eker HH, Consten EC, Marsman HA, Wouters MW, Kok NF, Grünhagen DJ, Klaase JM, Besselink MG, de Boer MT, Dejong CH, van Gulik TM, Hagendoorn J, Hoogwater FH, Molenaar IQ, Liem MS. Case-mix adjustment to compare nationwide hospital performances after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:649-659. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
|
12
|
Elfrink AKE, Pool M, van der Werf LR, Marra E, Burgmans MC, Meijerink MR, den Dulk M, van den Boezem PB, Te Riele WW, Patijn GA, Wouters MWJM, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Gobardhan PD, Buis CI, Kuhlmann KFD, Verhoef C, Besselink MG, Grünhagen DJ, Klaase JM, Kok NFM. Preoperative imaging for colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide population-based study. BJS Open 2020; 4:605-621. [PMID: 32374497 PMCID: PMC7397351 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) preoperative imaging may include contrast‐enhanced (ce) MRI and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (18F‐FDG) PET–CT. This study assessed trends and variation between hospitals and oncological networks in the use of preoperative imaging in the Netherlands. Methods Data for all patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2018 were retrieved from a nationwide auditing database. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess use of ceMRI, 18F‐FDG PET–CT and combined ceMRI and 18F‐FDG PET–CT, and trends in preoperative imaging and hospital and oncological network variation. Results A total of 4510 patients were included, of whom 1562 had ceMRI, 872 had 18F‐FDG PET–CT, and 1293 had combined ceMRI and 18F‐FDG PET–CT. Use of ceMRI increased over time (from 9·6 to 26·2 per cent; P < 0·001), use of 18F‐FDG PET–CT decreased (from 28·6 to 6·0 per cent; P < 0·001), and use of both ceMRI and 18F‐FDG PET–CT 16·9 per cent) remained stable. Unadjusted variation in the use of ceMRI, 18F‐FDG PET–CT, and combined ceMRI and 18F‐FDG PET–CT ranged from 5·6 to 100 per cent between hospitals. After case‐mix correction, hospital and oncological network variation was found for all imaging modalities. Discussion Significant variation exists concerning the use of preoperative imaging for CRLM between hospitals and oncological networks in the Netherlands. The use of MRI is increasing, whereas that of 18F‐FDG PET–CT is decreasing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A K E Elfrink
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - M Pool
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L R van der Werf
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Marra
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M R Meijerink
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M den Dulk
- Departments of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - W W Te Riele
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | | | - M W J M Wouters
- Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - M S L Liem
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | | | - C I Buis
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - K F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|