Pelvic Ewing sarcoma: Should all patients receive pre-operative radiotherapy, or should it be delivered selectively?

[Radiotherapy in Ewing sarcomas]

Ewing sarcomas are the 2nd cause of malignant bone tumors in children and young adults. After induction chemotherapy, local treatment is essential and most often includes surgery of the primary tumor. Radiotherapy may be necessary as an exclusive local procedure when surgery is not possible, or in an adjuvant situation when the surgical procedure must be completed (incomplete resection or poor histological response in particular). Radiotherapy can also concern metastatic sites, particularly in cases of pulmonary metastases and/or in an oligo-metastatic situation. This article provides a review of current indications for radiotherapy, technical modalities of irradiation (delineation of volumes, recommended doses), and the results of recent studies.

UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas

This document is an update of the British Sarcoma Group guidelines (2016) and provides a reference standard for the clinical care of UK patients with primary malignant bone tumours (PMBT) and giant cell tumours (GCTB) of bone. The guidelines recommend treatments that are effective and should be available in the UK, and support decisions about management and service delivery. The document represents a consensus amongst British Sarcoma Group members in 2024. Key recommendations are that bone pain, or a palpable mass should always lead to further investigation and that patients with clinical or radiological findings suggestive of a primary bone tumour at any anatomic site should be referred to a specialist centre and managed by an accredited bone sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Treatment recommendations are provided for the major tumour types and for localised, metastatic and recurrent disease. Follow-up schedules are suggested.

An unusual cystic presentation of pelvic skeletal Ewing sarcoma: a case series

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is the second most common primary malignant bone tumour in children and adolescents. About 14.5% of primary malignancies develop in pelvic bones, where they typically have worse prognoses than extremity or acral sarcomas. It usually presents with aggressive features on radiology scans, but may also present with different radiological characteristics. In this series, we describe rare appearances of pelvic skeletal Ewing sarcoma, with large extraosseous cystic component on imaging, defined by the presence of fluid-filled spaces in the extraosseous tumour lesion, which distinguishes it from the solid nature of conventional ES. We report 3 cases of cystic presentation of ES, with imaging features supporting diagnosis of a primary malignant bone tumour arising from the superior pubic ramus with associated massive intrapelvic solid and cystic mass. CT-guided biopsy provided diagnosis of ES, with large intrapelvic soft tissue and cystic component. These patients underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and proton beam therapy with significant reduction in size of the solid components, while the cystic components remained relatively unchanged. Two patients underwent surgical resection of the tumour (navigated P3 internal hemipelvectomy and hemipelvis P2/P3 resection, respectively), and one patient died while on treatment. In both who underwent surgery, histology showed ES with margins clear and more than 99% of treatment-induced necrosis. To the authors' knowledge, this unusual presentation of pelvic ES is described for the first time in the literature as a case series, with particular reference to atypical extraosseous cystic changes, along with the clinical and radiological characteristics, and their treatment.

Pediatric Axial Ewing Sarcoma: A Retrospective Population-Based Survival Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ewing sarcomas of the axial skeleton represent a notable challenge for clinicians because of their aggressive presentation and tendency to obstruct neurovascular structures; however, little data exist regarding axial tumors in children. This study is the first population-based analysis assessing treatment regimens for axial Ewing sarcomas and their effects on cancer-specific survival and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Data from 2004 to 2019 were collected for all patients aged 1 to 24 years from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Primary groups included pelvic tumors, thoracic tumors, and vertebral tumors. Chi-squared and Kaplan-Meier tests were used to assess associations between demographic variables, clinical and treatment characteristics, and patient survival.

RESULTS

Pelvic tumors were most common, and 49.7% received chemotherapy/radiation. Vertebral tumors were least common, and 56.7% received chemotherapy/surgery/radiation. 53.5% of thoracic tumors received chemotherapy/surgery. Surgery was most common for thoracic tumors (80.2%) and rare for pelvic tumors (38.9%). Radiation therapy was most common for vertebral tumors (83.6%) and least common for thoracic tumors (36.0%). Pelvic tumors exhibited the lowest OS (1-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS: 96%, 70%, and 59%), followed by thoracic tumors (1-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS: 97%, 79%, and 66%) and vertebral tumors (1-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS: 92%, 77%, and 68%).

CONCLUSION

This study underpins the importance of both early detection and chemotherapy-based multimodal therapy in the treatment of axial Ewing sarcoma in a pediatric population. A comparatively large decline in OS was observed between 5 and 10 years for patients with thoracic tumors, and this cohort's 10-year OS has not improved when compared with a similar SEER cohort from 1973 to 2011. Despite a growing body of research supporting definitive radiation therapy, a notable portion of patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma did not receive radiation, representing an unmet need for this population.

Lumbar functional evaluation of pelvic bone sarcomas after surgical resection and spinal pelvic fixation: A clinical study of 304 cases

AIMS

We endeavored to introduce a novel scoring system (Lumbar Functional Index, LFI) capable of evaluating lumbar function in pelvic bone sarcoma patients who underwent surgical resection and spinal pelvic fixation, while simultaneously identifying the incidence, outcomes, and risk factors of lumbar function impairment among these populations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 304 primary bone sarcoma patients were recruited. The LFI was created based on the Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores. Lumbar function impairment was defined as LFI score ≥ 18 points, which was identified as high LFI. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, and oncological outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort included chondrosarcoma (39.8%), osteosarcoma (29.9%), Ewing sarcoma (8.6%), bone-derived undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (7.2%), giant cell tumor of bone (7.2%), chordoma (2.3%), and other bone sarcomas (5.0%). The LFI score exhibited significant negative correlation with common scoring systems of bone sarcoma. The incidence of high LFI was 23.0%. Patients with high LFI demonstrated a higher prevalence of type I + II + III + IV pelvic tumor, more sacrificed nerve roots and bilateral lumbar spine fixation during surgery, while lower percentage of R0 resection and local control of pelvic tumor. Decreased median overall survival (30 vs. 52 months, p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (14 vs. 24 months, p < 0.001) time were observed in these patients. Type I + II + III + IV pelvic tumor and sacrificed nerve roots≥2 were identified as risk factors for high LFI, while R0 resection and local control were identified as protective factors.

CONCLUSION

The LFI scoring system exhibited a significant negative correlation to current scoring systems. High LFI patients had worse prognosis and distinct characteristics. The risk factors of high LFI included type I + II + III + IV pelvic tumor and sacrificed nerve roots≥2, and the protective factors included R0 resection and local control.

Pelvic bone sarcomas, prognostic factors, and treatment: A narrative review of the literature

Primary sarcomas of bone are rare malignant mesenchymal tumors. The most common bone sarcomas are osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and chondrosarcoma. The prognosis has improved over the years, but bone sarcomas are still life-threatening tumors that need a multidisciplinary approach for diagnosis and treatment. Bone sarcomas arising in the pelvis present a unique challenge to orthopedic oncologists due to the absence of natural anatomical barriers, the close proximity of vital neurovascular structures, and the high mechanical demands placed on any pelvic reconstruction following the excision of the tumor. While radiotherapy has an important role especially in Ewing's sarcoma and chemotherapy for both Ewing's sarcoma and osteosarcoma, surgery remains the main choice of treatment for all three entities. While external hemipelvectomy has remained one option, the main aim of surgery is limb salvage. After complete tumor resection, the bone defect needs to be reconstructed. Possibilities to reconstruct the defect include prosthetic or biological reconstruction. The method of reconstruction is dependent on the location of tumor and the surgery required for its removal. The aim of this article is to give an insight into pelvic bone sarcomas, their oncological and surgical outcomes, and the options for treatment based on the authors' experiences.

Analysis of Local Control Outcomes and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Localized Pelvic Ewing Sarcoma Patients Treated With Radiation Therapy: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To identify potential clinical prognostic factors associated with a higher risk of local recurrence in patients with localized pelvic Ewing sarcoma treated with radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data for 101 patients treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT) or both surgery and radiation (S + RT) to primary pelvic tumors on INT-0091, INT-0154, and AEWS0031 were analyzed. Imaging data for patients who did not receive radiation were not available for central review; therefore, patients with surgery alone were not included. Cumulative incidence rates for local failure at 5 years from time of local control were calculated accounting for competing risks.

RESULTS

The most common pelvic subsite was sacrum (44.6%). RT was used in 68% of patients and S + RT in 32%. The local failure rate was 25.0% for RT and 6.3% for S + RT (P = .046). There was no statistically significant difference in local control modality by tumor characteristics. Tumors originating in the ischiopubic-acetabulum region were associated with the highest local failure incidence, 37.5% (P = .02, vs sacrum and iliac/buttock tumors), particularly those treated with RT (50.0%, P = .06). A higher incidence of local failure was seen with each additional 100 mL of tumor at diagnosis (P = .04). Multivariable analysis demonstrated RT alone (hazard ratio [HR], 5.1; P = .04), tumor subsite (particularly ischiopubic-acetabulum tumors; HR 4.6; P = .02), and increasing volume per 100 mL (HR, 1.2; P = .01) were associated with a higher incidence of local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination surgery and RT is associated with improved local control in patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma compared with definitive RT. Tumors involving the ischiopubic-acetabulum region and increasing tumor volume at diagnosis are associated with inferior local control. Tumor characteristics did not correlate with choice of local therapy modality suggesting an opportunity to develop best local therapy practices guidelines for future studies based on tumor features.

Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis: Clinical features and overall survival. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022;33:100634. [PMID: 36126512 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100634]

INTRODUCTION

Primary Ewing Sarcoma of Bone is a malignancy whose treatment requires both systemic chemotherapy and local control through surgical resection and/or radiation. Ewing Sarcoma of the pelvis has been noted to confer a worse prognosis relative to other anatomic sites of Ewing Sarcoma. This study explores the presenting features, treatment modalities for local control, and overall survival of primary Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis in comparison to other commonly affected anatomic sites.

METHODS

The National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) database was used to identify cases of pelvic Ewing sarcoma diagnosed between years 2004 and 2015. Demographic variables including sex, race, and age at diagnosis were described for each case, as well as therapeutic modalities including surgery and radiation. Bone-specific Collaborative Staging variables, including tumor size, tumor extension, and metastasis at diagnosis, were described for the same cohort. Univariate and multivariate assessments were performed for statistical comparison between presenting factors, treatment modalities, and between anatomic locations of presentation.

RESULTS

Within the database, 296 patients with Ewing sarcoma of the pelvic bones were available for review, which represented 25.7% of the 1152 cases surveyed across all anatomic sites. In the subset of patients with Ewing Sarcoma of the pelvis, 63.5% were male; the median age of diagnosis was 17 years; extra-compartmental tumor extension was noted in 82.1%; average tumor size was 9.7 cm; and metastasis at diagnosis was noted in 46.1% of the cohort. Only 28.6% of the pelvis sarcoma patients received surgical resection as part or all of their local control treatment, while 67.6% received some form of radiation therapy. When compared to the presenting features of Ewing Sarcoma from other anatomic sites, patients with pelvic tumors had larger tumors at time of diagnosis, higher rates of metastatic disease, and were less likely to undergo surgical intervention. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates for the patients presenting with Ewing Sarcoma of the pelvis was 70.3%, 49.7%, and 41.9%, respectively, which were significantly lower across all time-points than any other anatomic site.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Ewing Sarcoma of the pelvis is an aggressive malignancy that presents with relatively large tumors and a high rate of metastatic dissemination. Surgical intervention is less frequent when Ewing Sarcoma presents in the pelvis than when it presents in other anatomic locations. These factors may contribute to the worse overall survival of Ewing Sarcoma when compared to the same diagnosis originating in other anatomic sites. Prospective, randomized study is required to determine the true causal effects of these factors on survival.

Management of Unresectable Localized Pelvic Bone Sarcomas: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

Simple Summary

Some locally advanced pelvic bone tumors are deemed unresectable and, as such, not suitable for curative surgery. In this setting, treatment options are generally limited and not unanimous, with decisions being made on an individual basis after multidisciplinary discussion. Ultimately, and notwithstanding the bright prospects raised by novel therapeutic approaches, treatment should be patient-tailored, weighing a panoply of patient- and tumor-related factors.

Abstract

Bone sarcomas (BS) are rare mesenchymal tumors usually located in the extremities and pelvis. While surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative treatment, some locally advanced tumors are deemed unresectable and hence not suitable for curative intent. This is often true for pelvic sarcoma due to anatomic complexity and proximity to vital structures, making treatment options for these tumors generally limited and not unanimous, with decisions being made on an individual basis after multidisciplinary discussion. Several studies have been published in recent years focusing on innovative treatment options for patients with locally advanced sarcoma not amenable to local surgery. The present article reviews the evidence regarding the treatment of patients with locally advanced and unresectable pelvic BS, with the goal of providing an overview of treatment options for the main BS histologic subtypes involving this anatomic area and exploring future therapeutic perspectives. The management of unresectable localized pelvic BS represents a major challenge and is hampered by the lack of comprehensive and standardized guidelines. As such, the optimal treatment needs to be individually tailored, weighing a panoply of patient- and tumor-related factors. Despite the bright prospects raised by novel therapeutic approaches, the role of each treatment option in the therapeutic armamentarium of these patients requires solid clinical evidence before becoming fully established.