Comparison of 4 lymph node staging systems for the prognostic prediction of esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with ≤15 retrieved lymph nodes

Prognostic significance of three lymph node staging systems in pancreatic cancer with ≤ 12 and > 12 retrieved lymph nodes

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive performance of negative lymph nodes (NLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and N stage in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) among patients with ≤ 12 retrieved lymph nodes and those with > 12 retrieved lymph nodes. Moreover, the association between the three nodal staging systems and survival was also explored. Clinical data on patients diagnosed with PDAC between 2004 and 2020 were downloaded from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cox regression was performed to identify independent predictors of cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Survival probability was calculated and compared by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's C-index were used to evaluate the prognostic ability of each nodal staging system. All three lymph node staging systems were independent predictors of CSS and OS. A higher NLN, a lower N stage, and a lower LNR were associated with improved survival. Compared with N stage, LNR staging performed better with a lower AIC and higher C-index for predicting the prognosis regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes, while NLN staging performed poorly in both the training and validation set. Subgroup analyses showed that the NLN successfully predicted survival outcomes in both lymph node-positive and node-negative patients. LNR demonstrated better predictive performance in PDAC patients regardless of the sufficiency of retrieved lymph nodes. Notably, for stage N0 disease, NLN was a more important prognostic predictor. The combination of LNR and NLN may offer more precise information on lymph node staging than the current staging system.

Prognostic significance of an innovative staging system based on the logarithmic odds of positive lymph nodes for resectable gastroesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a population-based study with external validation of data

BACKGROUND

After receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the number of examined lymph nodes in resectable gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) will decrease, this may not accurately determine the N staging. So our study evaluates the clinical significance of a new staging model based on the logarithmic odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in patients with GEC after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

METHODS

A total of 1 130 patients with pathologically diagnosed GEC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation from 2004 to 2019 included in the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Results (SEER) database were selected for analysis. Lymph nodes were staged according to the AJCC TNM staging system (eighth edition) and LODDS. Patient prognosis across the two systems were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method, differences in node staging were evaluated by the Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion. In addition, 914 patients from our center were externally validated.

RESULTS

Compared to the traditional TNM staging system, the new TLODDSM staging system was comprised of stage I, stage II, stage IIIA, stage IIIB, and stage IVA, and decision curve analysis showed that the new staging system had higher benefits for different decision thresholds than the old staging system. The Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion of the new staging system was lower than those of the old staging system, indicating the sensitivity of the TLODDSM staging system for predicting the prognosis of patients was higher. In addition, stage-IIIB or -IVA patients in the new staging system benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy. The externally validated data from our center supported this conclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the TNM staging system, the TLODDSM staging system has significant advantages in predicting prognosis of patients with GEC who have completed neoadjuvant chemoradiation, guiding the adjuvant chemotherapy for patients.

Log odds of positive lymph nodes show better predictive performance on the prognosis of early-onset colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

As the incidence of colorectal cancer tends to be younger, early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) has attracted more attention in recent years. We aimed to assess the optimal lymph node staging system among EOCRC patients, and then, establish informative assessment models for prognosis prediction.

METHODS

Data of EOCRC were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Survival prediction ability of three lymph node staging systems including N stage of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system, lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) was assessed and compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC), Harrell's concordance index (C-index), and likelihood ratio (LR) test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify the prognostic predictors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Effectiveness of the model was demonstrated by receiver operative curve and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 17,535 cases were finally included in this study. All three lymph node staging systems showed significant performance in survival prediction (p < 0.001). Comparatively, LODDS presented a better ability of prognosis prediction with lower AIC (OS: 70,510.99; CSS: 60,925.34), higher C-index (OS: 0.6617; CSS: 0.6799), and higher LR test score (OS: 998.65; CSS: 1103.09). Based on independent factors identified from Cox regression analysis, OS and CSS nomograms for EOCRC were established and validated.

CONCLUSIONS

LODDS shows better predictive performance than N stage or LNR among patients with EOCRC. Novel validated nomograms based on LODDS could effectively provide more prognostic information than the TNM staging system.

Evaluating prognostic value and stage migration effects using a positive lymph node ratio in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is increasing worldwide. Lymph node metastasis is an important clinical issue in AEG patients. This study investigated the usefulness of a positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) to stratify prognosis and evaluate stage migration.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 117 consecutive AEG patients (Siewert type I or II) who received a lymphadenectomy between 2000 and 2016.

RESULTS

A PLNR cut-off value of 0.1 most effectively stratified patient prognosis into two groups (P < 0.001). Also, prognosis could be clearly stratified into four groups: PLNR = 0, 0 < PLNR < 0.1, 0.1 ≤ PLNR < 0.2, and 0.2 ≤ PLNR (P < 0.001, 5-year survival rates (88.6%, 61.1%, 34.3%, 10.7%)). A PLNR ≥ 0.1 significantly correlated with tumour diameter ≥ 4 cm (P < 0.001), tumour depth (P < 0.001), greater pathological N-status (P < 0.001), greater pathological Stage (P < 0.001), and oesophageal invasion length ≥ 2 cm (P = 0.002). A PLNR ≥ 0.1 was a poor independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 6.47, P < 0.001). The PLNR could stratify prognosis if at least 11 lymph nodes were retrieved. A 0.2 PLNR cut-off value discriminated a stage migration effect in pN3 and pStage IV (P = 0.041, P = 0.015) patients; PLNR ≥ 0.2 might potentially diagnose a worse prognosis and need meticulous follow-up post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

Using PLNR, we can evaluate the prognosis and detect higher malignant cases who need meticulous treatments and follow-up in the same pStage.

Comparison of Four Lymph Node Staging Systems in Gastric Adenocarcinoma after Neoadjuvant Therapy – A Population-Based Study

Introduction

Neoadjuvant treatment leads in a reduction in positive lymph nodes and examined lymph nodes (ELN), which may affect assessment of lymph node staging and postoperative treatment. We aimed to compare the staging systems of lymph node ratio (LNR), the positive logarithm ratio of lymph nodes (LODDS), negative lymph nodes (NLN), and the 8th AJCC ypN stage for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

Materials and Methods

Data was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and 1,551 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and radical surgery were enrolled. Harrell’s concordance index, the Receiver Operative Curve, the likelihood ratio test, and the Akaike information criterion were used to compare the predictive abilities of the different staging systems.

Results

Among the 1,551 patients, 689 (44.4%) had ELN < 16 and node-negative patients accounted for 395 (25.5%). When regarded as the categorical variable, LNR had better discrimination power, higher homogeneity, and better model fitness for CSS and OS compared to other stage systems, regardless of the status of ELN. When regarded as the continuos variable, LODDS outperformed others for CSS. Furthermore, the NLN staging system performed superior to others in node-negative patients.

Conclusions

LNR had a better predictive performance than ypN, LODDS and NLN staging systems regardless of the status of ELN when regarded as the categorical variable, whereas LOODS became the better predictive factor for CSS when regarded as the continuos variable. In node-negative patients, NLN might be a feasible option for evaluating prognosis. A combination of LNR and NLN should be considered as user-friendly method in the clinical prognostic assessment.