1
|
Sammour T. The oncologic benefits of lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant therapy - local control or survival? Tech Coloproctol 2025; 29:51. [PMID: 39847175 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03082-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/25/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2025]
Abstract
Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) for rectal adenocarcinoma is an established treatment modality for selected patients with abnormal lateral pelvic lymph nodes on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging. The goal of this treatment is to achieve a true R0 resection, including lymphadenectomy, with the aim of improving patient oncological outcome, potentially at the expense of surgical and functional complications. However, there remain several areas of controversy resulting from a distinct lack of clarity regarding effective patient selection, lymph node size criteria, the role and extent of routine neoadjuvant treatment versus surgery alone in selected cases, the impact on patient survival metrics and whether the existing data are even valid in the era of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). Furthermore, the lack of widely disseminated surgical standardisation and expertise in performing this procedure potentially contributes to the lack of utilisation in certain countries and regions. In this narrative review, we summarize the current state of the literature and attempt to answer the question of what oncological benefits there are, if any, from LPLND after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer, and whether these justify the risks and potential need for inter-hospital transfer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, SA, 5000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee JE, Kim KE, Jeong WK, Baek SK, Bae SU. Effect of postoperative complications on 5-year survival following laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:179. [PMID: 39505787 PMCID: PMC11541292 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04730-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of postoperative complications on long-term survival after laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer. METHODS We retrospectively included 204 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer from January 2016 to June 2020. RESULTS Overall, 68 (33.3%) patients had postoperative complications, twelve (17.6%) of which were classified as Clavien-Dindo class 3a or higher. The 5-year overall survival rate of the non-complication and complication groups were 93.0% and 81.7%, respectively (p = 0.048; Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test), and those among patients with stage III disease were 87.0% and 61.3%, respectively (p = 0.045). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 85.6% and 77.4%, respectively (p = 0.042). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed that nodal stage (hazard ratio, 8.392; 95% confidence interval, 1.892-37.175; p = 0.005) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival, and postoperative complications (hazard ratio, 2.996; 95% confidence interval, 1.076-8.340; p = 0.036) were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. CONCLUSION Postoperative complications were associated with poor oncological outcomes, especially among patients with stage III colorectal cancer, and independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Eun Lee
- Department of Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Kyeong Eui Kim
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, 1035, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Woon Kyung Jeong
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, 1035, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Kyu Baek
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, 1035, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Uk Bae
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University, Dalgubeol-Daero, Dalseo-Gu, 1035, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoshino N, Fukui Y, Ueno K, Hida K, Obama K, Sakamoto K, Kobayashi H, Itabashi M, Ishihara S, Kawai K, Ajioka Y. Identification of lateral pelvic nodes without metastasis in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy based on magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:732-739. [PMID: 39229550 PMCID: PMC11368503 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Intensive localized therapy is promising for the treatment of rectal cancer. In Japan, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are used as preoperative treatments for this disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to diagnose lateral pelvic node (LPN) metastases, but the changes in LPN findings on MRI following preoperative treatment are unclear. Furthermore, there may be patients in whom LPN dissection can be omitted after CRT/NAC. Methods Patients who underwent total mesorectal excision with LPN dissection after CRT/NAC at 13 Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum member institutions between 2017 and 2019 were included. Changes in the short diameter of the LPNs after CRT/NAC and the reduction rate were examined. Results A total of 101 LPNs were examined in 28 patients who received CRT and 228 in 47 patients who received NAC. Comparison of LPNs before and after CRT/NAC showed that most LPNs shrank after CRT but that the size reduction was variable after NAC. Although some LPNs with a short diameter of <5 mm showed residual metastasis, no metastases were observed in LPNs that were <5 mm in short diameter before and after CRT/NAC and did not shrink after treatment. Conclusion Although the short diameter of LPNs was significantly reduced by both CRT and NAC, even LPNs with a short diameter of <5 mm could have residual metastases. However, dissection may be omitted for LPNs <5 mm in short diameter that do not shrink after preoperative CRT or NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuaki Hoshino
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Yudai Fukui
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryToranomon HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Kohei Ueno
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Kazutaka Obama
- Department of SurgeryKyoto University Graduate School of MedicineKyotoJapan
| | - Kazuhiro Sakamoto
- Department of Coloproctological Surgery, Faculty of MedicineJuntendo UniversityTokyoJapan
| | | | - Michio Itabashi
- Department of Surgery Institute of GastroenterologyTokyo Women's Medical UniversityTokyoJapan
| | | | - Kazushige Kawai
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryTokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Yoichi Ajioka
- Division of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesNiigata UniversityNiigataJapan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Moraes FCA, Kelly FA, Souza MEC, Burbano RMR. Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after pathological complete response in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31,558 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:96. [PMID: 38913175 PMCID: PMC11196358 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04668-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) typically involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery (total mesorectal excision, TME). While achieving a complete pathological response (pCR) is a strong indicator of a positive prognosis, the specific benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after pCR remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential advantages of adjuvant therapy in patients who achieve pCR. METHODS In this study, we searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant research. We focused on binary outcomes, analyzing them using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To account for potential variability between studies, all endpoints were analyzed with DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and employed the R statistical software (version 4.2.3) for all analyses. RESULTS Thirty-four studies, comprising 31,558 patients, were included. The outcomes demonstrated a significant difference favoring the AC group in terms of overall survival (OS) (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p = 0.015; I2 = 0%), and OS in 5 years (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.21-2.24; p = 0.001; I2 = 39%). There was no significant difference between the groups for disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.17; p = 0.61; I2 = 17%), DFS in 5 years (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.82-1.74; p = 0.36; I2 = 43%), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.87-1.40; p = 0.39; I2 = 0%), and relapse-free survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.78-1.51; p = 0.62; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant difference in favor of the ACT group in terms of survival after pCR. Therefore, the administration of this treatment as adjuvant therapy should be encouraged in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Francinny Alves Kelly
- Department of Hypertension, Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rommel Mario Rodríguez Burbano
- Federal University of Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa, nº 01, Guamá, Belém, Pará, 66073-000, Brazil
- Ophir Loyola Hospital, Belém, Pará, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xiao T, Chen J, Liu Q. Management of internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes in mid-low rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:153. [PMID: 38863003 PMCID: PMC11167753 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03427-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
In rectal cancer treatment, the diagnosis and management of lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LLN) are critical for preventing local recurrence. Over time, scholars have reached a consensus: when imaging suggests LLN metastasis, combining neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with selective LLN dissection (LLND) can mitigate the risk of recurrence. Selective LLND typically encompasses lymph nodes in the internal iliac and obturator regions. Recent studies emphasize distinctions between internal iliac and obturator lymph nodes regarding prognosis and treatment outcomes, prompting the need for differentiated diagnostic and treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tixian Xiao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianan Chen
- Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 68198, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abe S, Nozawa H, Sasaki K, Murono K, Emoto S, Yokoyama Y, Matsuzaki H, Nagai Y, Shinagawa T, Sonoda H, Ishihara S. Nutritional Status Indicators Predict Tolerability to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Digestion 2024; 105:345-358. [PMID: 38810604 PMCID: PMC11457970 DOI: 10.1159/000539211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after radical surgery following preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is now the standard of care. The identification of risk factors for the discontinuation of AC is important for further improvements in survival. We herein examined the prognostic impact of chemotherapy compliance and its relationship with the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) before surgery. METHODS A total of 335 stage II-III LARC patients who underwent preoperative CRT between 2003 and 2022 at the University of Tokyo Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. We excluded patients with recurrence during AC and those who had not received AC. The relationship between AC and long-term outcomes and that between PNI values and the duration of AC were examined. RESULTS Thirty-one patients discontinued AC and 62 continued AC. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly shorter in patients who discontinued AC (p = 0.0056). The discontinuation of AC was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.24, p = 0.0233). Twenty-one patients were classified as having low PNI (less than 40), which correlated with an older age, low body mass index, and incomplete AC. Low PNI was an independent risk factor for a shorter duration of AC (HR: 2.53, p = 0.0123). CONCLUSION The discontinuation of AC was related to poor RFS in patients with LARC undergoing preoperative CRT. Furthermore, a low PNI value was identified as a risk factor for a shorter duration of AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Abe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Yokoyama
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Matsuzaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuzo Nagai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahide Shinagawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Sonoda
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yang J, Deng Q, Cheng Y, Fu Z, Wu X. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcome of rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:31. [PMID: 38273352 PMCID: PMC10809453 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03300-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locally advanced rectal cancer is typically treated using a combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal resection. While achieving pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been recognized as a positive prognostic factor in oncology, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after surgery remains uncertain. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcomes of rectal cancer patients who attain pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS This meta-analysis followed the guidelines outlined in the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). The Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature. RESULTS A total of 34 retrospective studies, including 9 studies from the NCBD database, involving 31,558 patients with pathological complete response rectal cancer, were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2023. The pooled analysis demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (HR = 0.803, 95% CI 0.678-0.952, P = 0.011), and no heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 0%). Locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a higher 5-year overall survival rate compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.605, 95% CI 1.183-2.177, P = 0.002). However, the analysis also revealed that postoperative ACT did not lead to improvements in disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival within the same patient population. Subgroup analysis indicated that pathological complete response patients with clinical stage T3/T4, lymph node positivity, and younger than 70 years of age may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy has a beneficial effect on improving overall survival among rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response. However, no such association was observed in terms of disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianguo Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Qican Deng
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Yong Cheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Zhongxue Fu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sylla P, Sands D, Ricardo A, Bonaccorso A, Polydorides A, Berho M, Marks J, Maykel J, Alavi K, Zaghiyan K, Whiteford M, Mclemore E, Chadi S, Shawki SF, Steele S, Pigazzi A, Albert M, DeBeche-Adams T, Moshier E, Wexner SD. Multicenter phase II trial of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: preliminary results. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9483-9508. [PMID: 37700015 PMCID: PMC10709232 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10266-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transanal TME (taTME) combines abdominal and transanal dissection to facilitate sphincter preservation in patients with low rectal tumors. Few phase II/III trials report long-term oncologic and functional results. We report early results from a North American prospective multicenter phase II trial of taTME (NCT03144765). METHODS 100 patients with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma located ≤ 10 cm from the anal verge (AV) were enrolled across 11 centers. Primary and secondary endpoints were TME quality, pathologic outcomes, 30-day and 90-day outcomes, and stoma closure rate. Univariable regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for incomplete TME and anastomotic complications. RESULTS Between September 2017 and April 2022, 70 males and 30 females with median age of 58 (IQR 49-62) years and BMI 27.8 (IQR 23.9-31.8) kg/m2 underwent 2-team taTME for tumors located a median 5.8 (IQR 4.5-7.0) cm from the AV. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was completed in 69%. Intersphincteric resection was performed in 36% and all patients were diverted. Intraoperative complications occurred in 8% including 3 organ injuries, 2 abdominal and 1 transanal conversion. The 30-day and 90-day morbidity rates were 49% (Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥ 3 in 28.6%) and 56% (CD ≥ 3 in 30.4% including 1 mortality), respectively. Anastomotic complications were reported in 18% including 10% diagnosed within 30 days. Higher anastomotic risk was noted among males (p = 0.05). At a median follow-up of 5 (IQR 3.1-7.4) months, 98% of stomas were closed. TME grade was complete or near complete in 90%, with positive margins in 2 cases (3%). Risk factors for incomplete TME were ASA ≥ 3 (p = 0.01), increased time between NRT and surgery (p = 0.03), and higher operative blood loss (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION When performed at expert centers, 2-team taTME in patients with low rectal tumors is safe with low conversion rates and high stoma closure rate. Mid-term results will further evaluate oncologic and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Dana Sands
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - Alison Ricardo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Mariana Berho
- Executive Administration Florida, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| | - John Marks
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA, USA
| | - Justin Maykel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Mark Whiteford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgical Division, The Oregon Clinic, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Elisabeth Mclemore
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sami Chadi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sherief F Shawki
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Scott Steele
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Albert
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advent Health Orlando, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Steven D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sylla P, Berho M, Sands D, Ricardo A, Bonaccorso A, Moshier E, Hain E, Letchinger R, Marks J, Whiteford M, Mclemore E, Maykel J, Alavi K, Zaghiyan K, Chadi S, Shawki SF, Steele S, Pigazzi A, Albert M, DeBeche-Adams T, Polydorides A, Wexner S. Discordance in Total Mesorectal Excision Specimen Grading in a Prospective Phase 2 Multicenter Rectal Cancer Trial: Are We Overestimating the Quality of Our Resections? Ann Surg 2023; 278:452-463. [PMID: 37450694 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the results of a rigorous quality control (QC) process in the grading of total mesorectal excision (TME) specimens during a multicenter prospective phase 2 trial of transanal TME. BACKGROUND Grading of TME specimens is based on the macroscopic assessment of the mesorectum and standardized through synoptic pathology reporting. TME grade is a strong predictor of outcomes with incomplete (IC) TME associated with increased rates of local recurrence relative to complete or near complete (NC) TME. Although TME grade serves as an endpoint in most rectal cancer trials, in protocols incorporating centralized review of TME specimens for quality assurance, discordance in grading and the management thereof has not been previously described. METHODS A phase 2 prospective transanal TME trial was conducted from 2017 to 2022 across 11 North American centers with TME quality as the primary study endpoint. QC measures included (1) training of site pathologists in TME protocols, (2) blinded grading of de-identified TME specimen photographs by central pathologists, and (3) reconciliation of major discordance before trial reporting. Cohen Kappa statistic was used to assess agreement in grading. RESULTS Overall agreement in grading of 100 TME specimens between site and central reviewer was rated as fair, (κ = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.10-0.61; P < 0.0001). Concordance was noted in 54%, with minor and major discordance in 32% and 14% of cases, respectively. Upon reconciliation, 13/14 (93%) major discordances were resolved. Pre versus postreconciliation rates of complete or NC and IC TME are 77%/16% and 7% versus 69%/21% and 10%. Reconciliation resulted in a major upgrade (IC-NC; N = 1) or major downgrade (NC/C-IC, N = 4) in 5 cases overall (5%). CONCLUSIONS A 14% rate of major discordance was observed in TME grading between the site and central reviewers. The resolution resulted in a major change in final TME grade in 5% of cases, which suggests that reported rates or TME completeness are likely overestimated in trials. QC through a central review of TME photographs and reconciliation of major discordances is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Sylla
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Mariana Berho
- Executive Administration Florida, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| | - Dana Sands
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| | - Alison Ricardo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Elisabeth Hain
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Riva Letchinger
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY
| | - John Marks
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA
| | - Mark Whiteford
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgical Division, the Oregon Clinic Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR
| | - Elisabeth Mclemore
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Justin Maykel
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA
| | - Karen Zaghiyan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sami Chadi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Scott Steele
- Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Matthew Albert
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Advent Health Orlando, Orlando, FL
| | | | | | - Steven Wexner
- Ellen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| |
Collapse
|