The forgotten node: Axillary surgery mandates expertise

Radiation therapy volumes after primary systemic therapy in breast cancer patients: an international EUBREAST survey

PURPOSE

After primary systemic therapy (PST), agreement on the extent of locoregional therapy is lacking in breast cancer patients who convert from a node-positive to a node-negative status. The aim of this survey was to investigate radiation therapy approaches after PST according to different axillary surgical strategies and disease responses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists developed a web-based survey containing 39 questions on locoregional management based on clinical scenarios in initially node positive breast cancer patients undergoing PST. Twelve international breast cancer societies distributed the link to breast surgeons and radiation oncologists.

RESULTS

Responses from 349 breast specialists were recorded, 72 of whom (20.6%) were radiation oncologists from 17 countries. Nodal status at diagnosis informed the decision for postoperative regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for 44/72 (61.1%) responders. RNI in node positive patients having undergone axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is delivered in selected cases by 30/72 (41.7%) responders and systemically recommended by 26/72 (36.1%) responders. In case of macrometastases found on ALND, 43/72 (59.7%) responders always deliver RNI. In case of micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node(s) or targeted lymph node(s), 45/72 (62.5%) responders prefer RNI to completion ALND. A majority of responders (59.7%) determine the target volume for RNI according to European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines. Significant heterogeneity was observed regarding nodal basins and volumes of interest for dose coverage by RNI.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant heterogeneity in radiation-therapy delivered to the axilla after PST. A more standardized approach engaging both radiation oncologists and breast surgeons will help to optimize the harm-benefit equilibrium of axillary surgery and RNI.

Incidental Axillary Lymphadenopathy Found on Radiation Planning Computed Tomography

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of axillary node-positive disease in patients with early breast cancer who had a suspicious axillary lymph node on radiation planning computed tomography (CT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review was conducted of the medical records of all patients with breast cancer who were referred for axillary ultrasound from the radiation unit to the breast imaging unit at the Meirav Breast Center, Sheba Medical Center, from 2012 to 2022. Ethics approval was obtained. Only the records of patients who were referred due to an abnormal axillary lymph node seen on radiation planning CT were further evaluated.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 21 patients were referred to the breast imaging unit for evaluation of suspicious nodes seen on radiation planning CT. Of these, 3 cases were excluded. A total of 15 out of the 18 (83%) patients included had an abnormal lymph node in the ultrasound, and an ultrasound-guided biopsy was recommended (BI-RADS 4). Of these, 3 (out of 15, 20%) had a positive biopsy for tumor cells from the axillary lymph node. Two were cases after primary systemic therapy without complete pathologic response. Thickening of the lymph node cortex and complete loss of the central fatty hilum were associated with pathologic lymph node.

CONCLUSION

Sonar had limited ability to differentiate reactive nodes from involved nodes. The presence of lymph nodes with loss of cortical-hilum differentiation on ultrasound together with clinical features are parameters that can help guide the need of further biopsy. Histopathology evaluation is important to make the diagnosis of residual axillary disease. Future studies and guidelines are needed to improve the diagnostic abilities and reduce the number of patients who are undergoing biopsy for noninvolved nodes.

The Lucerne Toolbox 2 to optimise axillary management for early breast cancer: a multidisciplinary expert consensus

Clinical axillary lymph node management in early breast cancer has evolved from being merely an aspect of surgical management and now includes the entire multidisciplinary team. The second edition of the "Lucerne Toolbox", a multidisciplinary consortium of European cancer societies and patient representatives, addresses the challenges of clinical axillary lymph node management, from diagnosis to local therapy of the axilla. Five working packages were developed, following the patients' journey and addressing specific clinical scenarios. Panellists voted on 72 statements, reaching consensus (agreement of 75% or more) in 52.8%, majority (51%-74% agreement) in 43.1%, and no decision in 4.2%. Based on the votes, targeted imaging and standardized pathology of lymph nodes should be a prerequisite to planning local and systemic therapy, axillary lymph node dissection can be replaced by sentinel lymph node biopsy ( ± targeted approaches) in a majority of scenarios; and positive patient outcomes should be driven by both low recurrence risks and low rates of lymphoedema.

Uncertainties and controversies in axillary management of patients with breast cancer

The aims of this Oncoplastic Breast Consortium and European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists initiative were to identify uncertainties and controversies in axillary management of early breast cancer and to recommend appropriate strategies to address them. By use of Delphi methods, 15 questions were prioritized by more than 250 breast surgeons, patient advocates and radiation oncologists from 60 countries. Subsequently, a global virtual consensus panel considered available data, ongoing studies and resource utilization. It agreed that research should no longer be prioritized for standardization of axillary imaging, de-escalation of axillary surgery in node-positive cancer and risk evaluation of modern surgery and radiotherapy. Instead, expert consensus recommendations for clinical practice should be based on current evidence and updated once results from ongoing studies become available. Research on de-escalation of radiotherapy and identification of the most relevant endpoints in axillary management should encompass a meta-analysis to identify knowledge gaps, followed by a Delphi process to prioritize and a consensus conference to refine recommendations for specific trial designs. Finally, treatment of residual nodal disease after surgery was recommended to be assessed in a prospective register.

Breast surgery after neoadjuvant therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The standard of care in breast surgery has changed, from mastectomy to breast conserving surgery whenever possible, and from axillary dissection to sentinel node biopsy. Neoadjuvant systemic approaches have broadened the indications for organ-conserving and less mutilating surgery, but also raise important questions of balancing locoregional treatment de-escalation and protecting excellent long-term outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have aimed at investigating the safety of de-escalating surgical approaches not only in the upfront breast surgery situation but also after neoadjuvant systemic therapy. This pertains to both the safety of breast conserving surgery - including more complex oncoplastic approaches - within the new (posttherapeutic) anatomical extent of the residual disease, but more controversially to de-escalating surgical treatment of the axilla. While sentinel node biopsy appears to be the standard of care for node-negative disease also after primary systemic therapy, the optimal procedure in situations of posttherapeutic node-positive disease remains highly controversial.

SUMMARY

Both breast and axillary surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for women with breast cancer has undergone multiple paradigm changes in recent years. For the primary tumor in the breast, breast-conserving surgery constitutes the standard of care, and unnecessary mastectomies should be strongly discouraged. For axillary surgery, sentinel-node biopsy should be aimed at, and completion axillary dissections minimized for situations of extensive disease and or poor neoadjuvant treatment response. Additional techniques such as targeted axillary dissection are currently under evaluation in clinical trials.