1
|
Väärämäki S, Salenius J, Pimenoff G, Uurto I, Suominen V. Overall outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair with a first-generation stent graft (Vanguard): A 20-year single-center experience. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72:896-903. [PMID: 32139310 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The problems with first-generation stent grafts for endovascular aneurysm repair are well known, but their long-term outcome remains to be established. The purpose of the study was to characterize the outcome of patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with a first-generation stent graft, Vanguard (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass), in a single academic center with a follow-up of up to 20 years. METHODS There were 48 AAA patients electively treated with a Vanguard stent graft between February 1997 and November 1999. The patients were monitored annually until the end of 2018. The outcomes were overall survival and the number of graft-related complications and reinterventions. RESULTS The mean age was 70 years (range, 54-85 years), and the mean follow-up was 107 months (range, 6-262 months). All stent grafts were successfully implanted, but 90% of the patients encountered graft-related complications during follow-up. The most common complications were endoleaks (type I, 27%; type II, 29%; type III, 31%), stent fracture (46%), graft thrombosis (31%), and migration (40%). A total of 40 (83%) patients required a secondary procedure during long-term follow-up. The endovascular method for treating the complication was successful in 73 (87%) of 84 cases. There were no primary conversions, but 10 patients (21%) required a late conversion. In five cases, the complications required relining with a newer device. There were four AAA ruptures (8.3%), two of them fatal. The cumulative overall survival rates were 94%, 69%, 33%, 15%, and 13% at 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The use of the Vanguard, a first-generation stent graft, was associated with multiple graft-related complications. However, these complications could mainly be treated by endovascular means. The Vanguard stent graft is a good example of how new technology can cause unpredictable problems that can magnify the workload and endanger the patient's well-being even decades after the initial procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvi Väärämäki
- Centre for Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Juha Salenius
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Tampere, Finland
| | - Georg Pimenoff
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Tampere, Finland
| | - Ilkka Uurto
- Centre for Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Tampere, Finland
| | - Velipekka Suominen
- Centre for Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Belvroy VM, Houben IB, Trimarchi S, Patel HJ, Moll FL, Van Herwaarden JA. Identifying and addressing the limitations of EVAR technology. Expert Rev Med Devices 2018; 15:541-554. [PMID: 30058398 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1505496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has improved over the last two decades. Approximately 80% of the patients presenting with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is nowadays primarily treated with EVAR. AREAS COVERED In this review, the differences between endovascular and open repair, the clinical characteristics needed for EVAR, the role of clinical imaging and the developments in EVAR technology will be discussed. Early mortality is lower in EVAR as compared to open repair, whereas this benefit is lost after 3 years postoperatively. EVAR comes with a high reintervention rate, with endoleak being the most important predictive factor for reintervention. Expanding technical possibilities have allowed surgeons to choose from a palate of endovascular approaches in aneurysm patients with challenging anatomies. EXPERT COMMENTARY Although EVAR has taken a giant leap forward in development, the new developments have seemed to surpass the long-term limitations with older devices. It is important to start focusing on the current limitations of EVAR, in particular the durability of devices in the human variable anatomic and dynamic environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viony M Belvroy
- a Department of Vascular Surgery II , Thoracic Aortic Research Center, Policlinico San Donato IRCCS, University of Milan , Milan , Italy
| | - Ignas B Houben
- b Department of Cardiovascular Surgery , Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan Health Center , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Santi Trimarchi
- a Department of Vascular Surgery II , Thoracic Aortic Research Center, Policlinico San Donato IRCCS, University of Milan , Milan , Italy
| | - Himanshu J Patel
- b Department of Cardiovascular Surgery , Frankel Cardiovascular Center, University of Michigan Health Center , Ann Arbor , Michigan , USA
| | - Frans L Moll
- c Department of Vascular Surgery , University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , the Netherlands
| | - Joost A Van Herwaarden
- c Department of Vascular Surgery , University Medical Center Utrecht , Utrecht , the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2018; 67:2-77.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1150] [Impact Index Per Article: 191.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
4
|
Mestres G, Zarka Z, García-Madrid C, Riambau V. Early Abdominal Aortic Endografts: A Decade Follow-up Results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40:722-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2010] [Accepted: 08/14/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
5
|
Chaikof EL, Brewster DC, Dalman RL, Makaroun MS, Illig KA, Sicard GA, Timaran CH, Upchurch GR, Veith FJ. The care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines. J Vasc Surg 2009; 50:S2-49. [PMID: 19786250 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 453] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2009] [Revised: 07/06/2009] [Accepted: 07/06/2009] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot L Chaikof
- Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga 30322, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liaw J, Clark M, Gibbs R, Jenkins M, Cheshire N, Hamady M. Update: Complications and management of infrarenal EVAR. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71:541-51. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2007] [Revised: 02/10/2008] [Accepted: 05/28/2008] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
7
|
Chan YC, Morales JP, Gulamhuseinwala N, Sabharwal T, Carmichael M, Thomas S, Carrell TWG, Reidy JF, Taylor PR. Large infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms: endovascular vs. open repair--single centre experience. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61:373-8. [PMID: 17263699 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01032.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has become an established alternative to open repair (OR). We present a consecutive series of 486 elective patients with large infra-renal aortic abdominal aneurysm, comparing OR with EVAR. Prospective data collected during an 8-year period from January 1997 to October 2005 was reviewed. Statistical analysis performed using SPSS data editor with chi(2) tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests. There were 486 patients with 329 OR (293 males, 36 females) with median age of 72 years with median diameter 6.3 cm and 157 EVAR (148 males, 9 females) with median age 75 years with median diameter 6.1 cm. Mortality was 13 (4%) for OR and 5 (3.2%) for EVAR (three of whom were in the UK EVAR 2 trial). Blood loss was significantly less for EVAR 500 ml vs. 1500 ml for OR. Sixty-five (19.8%) patients with OR had significantly more peri-operative complications compared with 14 (8.9%) with EVAR. The length of stay in hospital was significantly less for EVAR. This non-randomised study shows that although EVAR does not have a statistically significantly lower mortality, it does have statistically significantly lower complication rates compared with OR. EVAR can be achieved with good primary success, but long-term follow-up is essential to assess durability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y C Chan
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Lambeth Palace Road, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Davey P, Rose JD, Parkinson T, Wyatt MG. The Mid-term Effect of Bare Metal Suprarenal Fixation on Renal Function Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 32:516-22. [PMID: 16781875 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2005] [Accepted: 04/27/2006] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the mid term effect of proximal bare metal fixation design on renal function in patients undergoing endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS Consecutive EVR patients for AAA from December 1995-2001 were included and grouped to either infrarenal (Group 1) or uncovered suprarenal (Group 2) fixation. Peri-operative renal function and at 6, 12 and 24 months was determined by serum creatinine (sCr mmol l(-1)) and Cockroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrC ml min(-1)). Changes in renal function were compared using non-parametric analysis. RESULTS Of the 179 EVR procedures during this six-year period, paired renal data was available for 135 patients at a minimal follow-up of 6 months (Gp1, n = 63; Gp2, n = 72). Median pre-EVR sCr and CrC were 113, 57 in Group 1 and 108, 58 in Group 2, p = NS. There was no significant deterioration in renal function within or between either group at 2 years post-EVR: median sCr, CrC values were 118, 56 (Group 1) and 111, 56 (Group 2), all p = NS. CONCLUSION This study suggests mid-term renal function remains unaffected following EVR of AAA, irrespective of proximal fixation type. Designs to improve stent durability and EVR applicability do not appear to compromise renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Davey
- Northern Vascular Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee WA, Huber TS, Seeger JM. Late type III endoleak from graft erosion of an Excluder stent graft: A case report. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44:183-5. [PMID: 16828442 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2005] [Accepted: 02/19/2006] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
We report a case of a late type III endoleak from a hole in the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft material of an Excluder bifurcated stent-graft approximately 12 months after implantation. The endoleak was successfully repaired by relining the defect site with an Excluder iliac limb. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of late graft-material related Type III endoleak involving the Excluder device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Anthony Lee
- Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0286, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Aortic stent-grafts were introduced at the beginning of the 1990s as a less invasive method of dealing with aortic aneurysms in patients with poor cardiovascular reserve. The numbers of procedures performed worldwide has increased exponentially despite the current lack of any substantial evidence for long-term efficacy in comparison with the gold standard of open surgical grafting. This review summarizes the evolution of the abdominal aortic stent-graft, the techniques used for assessment and deployment, and the effect of the procedure on both the patient and the device. The recent publication of two national multicenter trials has confirmed that the endovascular technique confers a 2.5-fold reduction in 30-day mortality in comparison with open surgery. However, over 4 years of follow-up, there is a 3-fold increase in the risk of reintervention and the overall costs are 30% greater with endovascular repair. Although the improvement in aneurysm-related mortality persists in the mid-term, because of the initial reduction in perioperative mortality, the all-cause mortality rate at 4 years is actually no better than for open surgery. Longer-term data from the randomized trials are awaited as well as results from the latest trials utilizing state-of-the-art devices. Whilst the overall management of abdominal aortic aneurysms has undoubtedly benefited from the introduction of stent-grafts, open repair currently remains the gold standard treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Rose
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rolland PH, Vidal V, Mekkaoui C, Bertrand MF, Levrier O, Bartoli JM. Embolization-driven Occlusion of the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysmal Sac as the Basis of Prevention of Endoleaks in a New Swine Model. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31:28-35. [PMID: 16202632 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2005] [Accepted: 07/07/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of a new polymer in embolization of endoleaks using an animal model. METHODS A modified aortic stent-graft was placed in 20 pigs. Embolization was performed at the time of graft insertion with non-cytotoxic n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate-metacryloxysulpholane and lipiodol (0.2:0.8ratio, 2 ml). Angiography, scanning electron microscopy and immuno-histochemistry were obtained at day 0, 1 week and 3 months. RESULTS In control animals both type I and II endoleaks were demonstrated. In treated animals, neither type-I nor type-II endoleaks were observed and a fibro-proliferative response was demonstrated within the aneurysm thrombus. CONCLUSIONS Host vascular responses govern the fate of the excluded aneurysm. Embolization of the sac and feeding arteries with non-cytotoxic glue sealed all occlusions by stimulating a massive restenosis-like process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P H Rolland
- Laboratory of Hemodynamics and Cardiovascular Mechanics, School of Medicine, La Timone Hospital for Adults, Mediterranean See University and Department of Radiology, Marseilles, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Onitsuka S, Tanaka A, Akashi H, Akaiwa K, Otsuka H, Yokokura H, Aoyagi S. Initial and Midterm Results for Repair of Aortic Diseases With Handmade Stent Grafts. Circ J 2006; 70:726-32. [PMID: 16723794 DOI: 10.1253/circj.70.726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine the initial and midterm results for repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic diseases using handmade stent-grafts (SGs). METHODS AND RESULTS Between 1999 and 2004, 41 consecutive patients (31 patients with thoracic and 10 patients with abdominal aortic disease) underwent endovascular stent-graft repair using handmade SGs. The follow-up averaged 24.8+/-17.6 months. The technical and initial clinical success rates were 82.9% (34/41) and 80.5% (33/41), respectively. Primary type I or III endoleaks occurred in 12.2% (5/41) of the patients. The hospital mortality rate was 4.9% (2/41). Persistent type I or III endoleaks occurred in 9.8% (4/41) and SG migrations occurred in 4.9% (2/41) of the patients. Open surgical conversion was undertaken in 12.2% (5/41) of the patients because of an endoleak and/or migration. The mean change observed in the aneurysm diameter was -6.2+/-10.5 mm, and shrinkage in the diameter occurred in 51.4% (18/35) of the cases. There was 1 patient death because of aneurysm rupture. Neither stent fracture nor graft hole was observed. The overall clinical success rate during follow-up was 78.0% (32/41). CONCLUSION The initial and midterm results obtained after repair of the aortic diseases using handmade SGs were considered to be satisfactory. More surgical experience and long-term patient follow-up are both required to further reassess the effect of this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiji Onitsuka
- Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tonnessen BH, Sternbergh WC, Money SR. Late problems at the proximal aortic neck: Migration and dilation. Semin Vasc Surg 2004; 17:288-93. [PMID: 15614753 DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2004.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Migration is a late-term complication of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) evidenced by downward slippage of the endograft. The etiology of migration may be inherent to problems with endograft fixation, although aortic neck dilation may also play a role. Devices with active fixation (ie, hooks and barbs) possess an additional mechanism of fixation and may better resist migration. Aortic neck dilation after EVAR is significant in a subset of patients and may be related to neck degeneration. Excessive oversizing of endografts may contribute to dilation and migration and is, therefore, not recommended. Migration should be treated when the overlap between the endograft and aortic neck is less than 10 mm or when associated with clinically significant events such as type I endoleak or aneurysm expansion. Failure to treat migration could lead to repressurization and subsequent rupture of the aneurysm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Britt H Tonnessen
- Section of Vascular Surgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA 70121, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|