A Comparison of the Mid-term Results Following the use of Bifurcated and Aorto-uni-iliac Devices in the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm with external iliac artery occlusion using VBX as the contralateral leg via axillary delivery: A case report

RATIONALE

A hostile iliac access route is an important consideration when enforcing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Herein, we report a case of AAA with unilateral external iliac artery occlusion, for which bifurcated EVAR was successfully performed using a single femoral and brachial artery access.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 76-year-old man who had undergone surgery for lung cancer 4.5 years prior was diagnosed AAA by computed tomography (CT).

DIAGNOSIS

Two and a half years before presentation, CT revealed an infrarenal 48 mm AAA, which had enlarged to 57 mm by 2 months preoperatively. CT identified occlusion from the right external iliac artery to the right common femoral artery, with no observed ischemic symptoms in his right leg. The right external iliac artery, occluded and atrophied, had a 1 to 2 mm diameter.

INTERVENTION

Surgery was commenced with the selection of a Zenith endovascular graft (Cook Medical) with an extended body length. Two Gore Viabahn VBX balloon expandable endoprosthesis (VBX; W.L. Gore & Associate) were delivered from the right axilla as the contralateral leg.

OUTCOMES

CT scan on the 2nd day after surgery revealed no endoleaks.

LESSONS

While the long-term results remain uncertain, this method may serve as an option for EVAR in patients with unilateral external iliac artery occlusion.

Impact of iliac access in elective and non-elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) is nowadays the establishment treatment for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) both in elective and urgent setting. Despite the large applicability and satisfactory results, the presence of hostile iliac anatomy affects both technical and clinical success. This narrative review aimed to report the impact of iliac access and related adjunctive procedures in patients undergoing EVAR in elective and non-elective setting. Hostile iliac access can be defined in presence of narrowed, tortuous, calcified, or occluded iliac arteries. These iliac characteristics can be graded by the anatomic severity grade score to quantitatively assess anatomic complexity before undergoing treatment. Literature shows that iliac hostility has an impact on device navigability, insertion and perioperative and postoperative results. Overall, it has been correlated to higher rate of access issues, representing up to 30% of the first published EVAR experience. Recent innovations with low-profile endografts have reduced large-bore sheaths related issues. However, iliac-related complications still represent an issue, and several adjunctive endovascular and surgical strategies are nowadays available to overcome these complications during EVAR. In urgent settings iliac hostility can significantly impact on particular time sensitive procedures. Moreover, in case of severe hostility patients might be written off for EVAR repair might be inapplicable, exposing to higher mortality/morbidity risk in this urgent/emergent setting. In conclusion, an accurate anatomical evaluation of iliac arteries during preoperative planning, materials availability, and skilled preparation to face iliac-related issues are crucial to address these challenges.

The impact of aorto-uni-iliac graft configuration on outcomes of endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular aneurysm repair has improved outcomes for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) compared with open repair. We examined the impact of aorto-uni-iliac (AUI) vs standard bifurcated endograft configuration on outcomes in rAAA.

METHODS

Patients 18 years or older in the Vascular Quality Initiative database who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair for rAAA from January 2011 to April 2020 were included. Patient characteristics were analyzed by graft configuration: AUI or standard bifurcated. Primary and secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, postoperative major adverse events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, mesenteric ischemia, lower extremity embolization, dialysis requirement, reoperation, pneumonia, or reintubation), and 1-year mortality. A subset propensity-score matched cohort was also analyzed.

RESULTS

We included 2717 patients: 151 had AUI and 2566 had standard bifurcated repair. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, major medical comorbidities, anatomic aortic neck characteristics, or rates of conversion to open repair. Patients who underwent AUI were more commonly female (30% vs 22%, P = .011) and had a history of congestive heart failure (19% vs 12%, P = .013). Perioperatively, patients who underwent AUI had a significantly higher incidence of cardiac arrest (15% vs 7%, P < .001), greater intraoperative blood loss (1.3 L vs 0.6 L, P < .001), longer operative duration (218 minutes vs 138 minutes, P < .0001), higher incidence of major adverse events (46.3% vs 33.3%, P = .001), and prolonged intensive care unit (7 vs 4.7 days, P = .0006) and overall hospital length of stay (11.4 vs 8.1 days, P = .0003). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated significant differences in 30-day (31.1% vs 20.2%, log-rank P = .001) and 1-year mortality (41.7% vs 27.7%, log-rank P = .001). The propensity-score matched cohort demonstrated similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

The AUI configuration for rAAA appears to be implemented in a sicker cohort of patients and is associated with worse perioperative and 1-year outcomes compared with a bifurcated graft configuration, which was also seen on propensity-matched analysis. Standard bifurcated graft configuration may be the preferred approach in the management of rAAA unless AUI configuration is mandated by patient anatomy or other extenuating circumstances.

Fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair using unilateral femoral access in patients with iliac occlusive disease

OBJECTIVE

Fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) in patients with occluded iliac arteries is challenging owing to limited access for branch vessel catheterization and increased risk for leg and spinal ischemic complications. The aim of this study was to analyze technical strategies and outcomes of F/BEVAR in patients with unilateral iliofemoral occlusive disease.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients treated by F/BEVAR in two institutions (2003-2021). Patients with unilateral iliofemoral occlusive disease were included in the analysis. All patients had one patent iliac artery that was used for advancement of the fenestrated-branch component. Preloaded catheter/guidewire systems or steerable sheaths were used as adjuncts to facilitate catheterization. Primary endpoints were technical success, mortality, major adverse events (stroke, spinal cord injury, dialysis or decrease in the glomerular filtration rate of more than 50%, bowel ischemia, myocardial infarction, or respiratory failure), primary iliac patency, and freedom from reinterventions.

RESULTS

There were 959 patients treated with F/BEVAR. Of these, 15 patients (1.56%; mean age, 74 years; 80% male) had occluded iliac arteries and 1 patent iliofemoral access and were treated for a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 8) or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 7). Brachial access was used in 14 of the 15 patients and preloaded systems in 7 of the 15 patients (47%). The remaining 53% had staggered deployment of stent grafts. There were seven physician-modified endovascular grafts, seven custom-made devices, and one off-the-shelf device used. Thirteen patients (87%) had distal seal using aortouni-iliac stent grafts and two (13%) had distal seal in the infrarenal aorta. Concomitant femoral crossover bypass (FCB) was performed in two patients and six patients had a prior FCB. Technical success was 100%. There were no intraoperative complications or early lower extremity ischemic complications, and all FCB were preserved. There was one mortality (7%) within 30 days owing to retrograde type A dissection. Major adverse events occurred in 20% of patients. The median follow-up was 12 months (range, 0-85 months). Two patients (13%) required three reinterventions. One patient required proximal stent graft extension for an acute type B dissection (3 months) and another required iliac extension for type Ib endoleak of an aortouni-iliac graft (21 months) and thrombolysis of that extension (50 months). At last follow-up, all patients had primary graft patency except one with secondary graft patency without new claudication. One patient had a single renal artery stent occlusion at follow-up with no r-intervention. The overall survival rate was 60%, without aortic-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Although challenging, F/BEVAR with unilateral femoral/brachial approach is feasible in patients with occluded iliac limbs, with an important rate of ischemic complications, but satisfactory outcomes.

A Comparison of the Short-Term Outcomes After use of Aorto-Uni-Iliac Versus Bifurcated Endografts for Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

To compare short-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with aorto-uni-iliac (AUI) versus bifurcated (BIFUR) endografts in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA).

METHODS

A total of 26 rAAA patients receiving EVAR with AUI device (14 patients) or the BIFUR graft (12 patients) between January 2016 and December 2020 were enrolled and reviewed. All EVARs for rAAA were performed in an emergency basis. Graft implantation success, short-term survival rates, and major complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Endograft implantation success was achieved in all patients. AUI group had shorter operative time than BIFUR group (121.77 ± 75.03 vs. 138.45 ± 143.34; P < 0.05). The 24-hr and 30-day survival rates were 85.7% (12/14) and 71.4% (10/14), respectively, whereas BIFUR group have 58.3% and 58.3%. None of the rAAA patients in both groups required reintervention. AUI group exhibited less incidence of compartment syndrome and endoleak compared with those of BIFUR ones.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term results of EVAR with the AUI configuration graft in patients with rAAAs are encouraging.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair with Bifurcated Stent Grafts in Patients with Narrow Versus Regular Aortic Bifurcation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Narrow aortic bifurcation (NAB) is considered as a risk factor for endograft limb thrombosis. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effect of narrow aortic bifurcation on outcomes of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).

METHODS

A systematic review that conformed to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. We searched electronic bibliographic databases using a combination of controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) and free-text terms to identify relevant studies comparing outcomes of EVAR in patients with NAB versus those with regular aortic bifurcation. Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcomes were calculated using odds ratio (OR) and those of continuous outcomes using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI). To account for expected heterogeneity, the random-effects model was applied for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Six observational studies were included, reporting a total of 2,673 patients (412 with NAR and 2,261 with friendly anatomy). Perioperative mortality was similar between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.30-4.34, P = 0.85, I² = 0%). Limb stenosis and kinking requiring additional intraoperative procedures was significantly more common among patients with NAB (OR 3.02, 95% CI 2.16-4.22, P < 0.00001, I² = 0%). Nevertheless, 30-day reintervention rate was similar between the groups, as was the rate of limb occlusion during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that at the expense of significantly more intraoperative additional procedures, EVAR with bifurcated devices can be safely performed in patients with NAB.

Complete Relining in Type 3 Endoleak with AFX Endograft Billowing and Severe Kinking: A Case Report

BACKGROUND

Type 3 endoleak (T3E) is usually treated by endovascular relining. The procedure can be technically complex in cases of endografts with kinking of innermost stents. We report a case of T3E in an AFX (Endologix, Irvine, CA, USA) endograft with sac enlargement, billowing, and severe kinking of the main body stents, managed with a complete relining endovascular procedure.

METHODS

A 69-year-old man with severe comorbidities and prior aorto-bi-iliac AFX endograft completed by an Endurant II cuff (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA) for a 63-mm asymptomatic infrarenal aneurysm was admitted to our department for a T3E with 7-mm sac enlargement. The computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed perfusion of the aneurysmal sac, AFX fabric disconnection from its stent (billowing), and severe stent kinking of the main body without a residual lumen. A digital subtraction angiography confirmed the T3E. A complete relining was performed by deploying a bifurcated Endurant II through the AFX stents.

RESULTS

The 1-year CTA proved the resolution of the endoleak with a stable aneurysmal sac diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of T3E with severe main body stent kinking and graft billowing, an endovascular procedure with a complete aorto-bi-iliac relining through inner stents may be considered.

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) can be defined as an abnormal, progressive dilatation of the abdominal aorta, carrying a substantial risk for fatal aneurysmal rupture. Endovascular aneurysmal repair (EVAR) for AAA is a minimally invasive endovascular procedure that involves the placement of a bifurcated or tubular stent-graft over the AAA to exclude the aneurysm from arterial circulation. In contrast to open surgical repair, EVAR only requires a stab incision, shorter procedure time, and early recovery. Although EVAR seems to be an attractive solution with many advantages for AAA repair, there are detailed requirements and many important aspects should be understood before the procedure. In this comprehensive review, fundamental information regarding AAA and EVAR is presented.

Clinical and anatomical variables associated in the literature to limb graft occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair compared to the experience of a tertiary referral center

INTRODUCTION

Limb graft occlusion (LGO) is the third reason for hospital readmission after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. We reviewed the clinical features, incidence, anatomical and devices related predictive factors for LGO after EVAR, and compared them with our experience.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

EVAR between 2010-2017 were included. Patients with LGO (LGO group) were matched for age and type of endograft with the rest of the entire cohort without LGO (control group). Clinical, anatomical, operative, outcome, and follow-up data were collected.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Two hundred seventy-six EVAR, (30 aorto-uniliac), 276 patients. The incidence of LGO was 2.5% (seven limbs, seven patients) at 27±24.6 days. Symptomatic patients were successfully treated. No mortality, limb loss, critical limb ischemia or residual claudication due to LGO was observed. Fifty patients resulted from the matching. Among the predictive factors of LGO between the two groups, significant differences were observed in graft limb oversizing ≥15% (57.1% vs. 8%, P=0.005), or kinking (42.9% vs. 2%, P=0.01), and diameter of the aortic bifurcation <20 mm (71.4% vs. 20%, P=0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that these three variables increased the risk of LGO (P=0.003, P=0.006, and P=0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The strongest predictive factors of LGO issued from our review were: extension in the external iliac artery, or small diameter; tortuous, angled, and calcific iliac axis; excessive oversizing of the limb graft, or kinking; use of old generation devices; EVAR performed outside the instructions for use. Limb graft oversizing >15%, or kinking, and aortic bifurcation <20 mm appear to be independent predictive factors of LGO.

Endovascular repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm using bifurcated stent-graft in a patient with bilateral external iliac artery occlusion

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in association with external iliac artery (EIA) occlusion is a rare entity which may limit endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) feasibility. We describe the case of an 84-year-old man affected by a 64mm infrarenal inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm with complete bilateral occlusion of EIA and patency of both common and internal iliac arteries. The common femoral arteries (CFA) were patent, and the patient was asymptomatic for lower limb claudication. The treatment was performed by EVAR using a bifurcated stent-graft after the recanalization of the left EIA, achieving technical success.

Using bifurcated endoprosthesis after iliac artery recanalization for concomitant abdominal aortic aneurysm and chronic total occlusions of access routes

OBJECTIVE

Concurrent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and unilateral iliac occlusion is a challenge in the implantation of bifurcated stent grafts (BFGs). The endovascular approach is less invasive than open surgery; the aortouni-iliac (AUI) graft with crossover femorofemoral bypass (CFFB) has many problems associated with extra-anatomic reconstruction. We attempted endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using BFGs in such cases and evaluated the outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Between October 2012 and December 2017, there were 649 patients who underwent surgery for AAA, of whom 32 patients underwent open reconstruction and 617 patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair; 15 patients with unilateral occluded iliac arteries and AAA were included. The analysis included patients with unilateral iliac chronic total occlusion (CTO). The intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up variables were reviewed.

RESULTS

The occluded lesions were the common iliac artery in 5 patients, the common iliac artery-external iliac artery (EIA) in 2 patients, the EIA in 7 patients, and the EIA-common femoral artery in 1 patient. The mean occlusive length was 89.7 ± 43.6 mm, and the mean AAA size was 54.6 ± 5.6 mm. Technical success was achieved in 13 patients (87%). All patients underwent recanalization through the true lumen and stent placement. The only procedure-related complication was distal embolism, which was treated with intraoperative thrombectomy. Recanalization of CTO lesions was not possible in two patients (13%), who underwent AUI graft placement with CFFB. The 30-day mortality and morbidity rates were 0%. The mean follow-up periods were 12 and 32 months for patients who underwent BFG placement and AUI graft placement with CFFB, respectively. During follow-up, the primary patency rate of successfully recanalized arteries was 100%. Aneurysm size decreased in four patients who underwent BFG placement; no change was seen in the other 11 patients. Freedom from aneurysm-related events was 100%; no patient needed secondary interventions. All patients with claudication pain preoperatively reported improvement in their symptoms during follow-up. In addition, the ankle-brachial index improved significantly from 0.51 ± 0.25 preoperatively to 0.88 ± 0.20 postoperatively (P < .001) in patients who underwent BFG placement.

CONCLUSIONS

Recanalization of unilateral iliac CTO lesions and placement of BFG in cases with concomitant aneurysmal disease and unilateral iliac occlusive disease demonstrated a significant primary patency rate with improvements in claudication and ankle-brachial index.

Endovascular and Hybrid Management of Patients Affected by Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Occlusion of the Iliac Arteries

The presence of a concomitant aortoiliac occlusive disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is rare and limits the implant of a bifurcated endograft.

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to evaluate early and midterm results of an endovascular or a hybrid approach in patients undergoing iliac revascularization and AAA exclusion.

METHODS

We reviewed our clinical series of patients from January 2016 to February 2018. Inclusion criterion was an iliac occlusion with concomitant aortic aneurysm.

RESULTS

We treated 8 male patients: 8 common iliac arteries (CIAs) and 5 external iliac arteries (EIAs). We implanted 8 bifurcated devices and 13 covered stents, 8 in CIA and 5 in EIA. In 5 cases, when the EIA was involved, we also performed a common femoral artery endarterectomy with a patch. During a mean follow-up of 10 months, the primary patency of the recanalized iliac arteries was 100%, no endoleaks, sac growth, or rupture were also recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular or hybrid treatment of the iliac occlusion combined with infrarenal aortic aneurysm is feasible with favorable early and midterm results.

Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Complete Iliac Occlusion: Case Series and Literature Review

In patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and complete iliac occlusion, endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using a bifurcated stent graft has clear advantages over aortouniiliac stent grafts. Bifurcated stent grafts had improved hemodynamic flow and increased primary and secondary patency rates compared with aortouniiliac stent grafts. The use of aortouniiliac stent grafts with femorofemoral crossover bypass is associated with complications including infection of the prosthesis, steal phenomenon, and the associated difficulties for further endovascular access at the site of the femoral anastomosis. Recanalization of occluded iliac arteries at the time of EVAR avoids the complications mentioned above. We report three cases of patients with AAA and iliac occlusion who were successfully treated with iliac recanalization at the time of EVAR.

Patient selection for endovascular sac sealing of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Endovascular sealing is a developing technique for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm that draws on novel concepts utilizing polymer filling of endobags within the aorto-iliac lumen. The morphologic indications and patient selection, while similar to those of endovascular aneurysm repair, differ in some regards. The Instructions for Use for the Nellix sealing device may expand the indications for aneurysm treatment and are closely scrutinized in this article. The authors draw on current evidence and their own experience and opinion in the discussion around appropriate patient selection and its influence on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm sealing. A recommendation for stricter adherence to Instructions for Use in the early phase of clinical experience is made, with acknowledgement that the natural evolution of endovascular aneurysm sealing may involve more challenging cases.

Aorto-Uni-Iliac Stent Grafts with and without Crossover Femorofemoral Bypass for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Parallel Observational Comparative Study

We investigated the safety and efficacy of primary aorto-uni-iliac (AUI) endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) without fem-fem crossover in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and concomitant aortoiliac occlusive disease. 537 EVARs were implemented between 2002 and 2015 in University Hospital Galway, a tertiary referral center for aortic surgery and EVAR. We executed a parallel observational comparative study between 34 patients with AUI with femorofemoral crossover (group A) and six patients treated with AUI but without the crossover (group B). Group B patients presented with infrarenal AAAs with associated total occlusion of one iliac axis and high comorbidities. Technical success was 97% (n = 33) in group A and 85% (n = 5) in group B (P = 0.31). Primary and assisted clinical success at 24 months were 88% (n = 30) and 12% (n = 4), respectively, in group A, and 85% (n = 5) and 15% (n = 1), respectively, in group B (P = 0.125). Reintervention rate was 10% (n = 3) in group A and 0% in group B (P = 0.084). No incidence of postoperative critical lower limb ischemia or amputations occurred in the follow-up period. AUI without crossover bypass is a viable option in selected cases.

Iliac anatomy and the incidence of adjunctive maneuvers during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Purpose

Challenging iliac anatomy remains an important issue during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and it is known that the length of the common iliac artery (CIA) is shorter in Asians than in Western groups. We analyzed both the iliac anatomy and the incidence of adjunctive maneuvers to overcome iliac artery-related difficulties during EVAR.

Methods

Seventy-four EVARs were performed for abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2010 and March 2013. Patient demographic data, iliac anatomical characteristics (presence of iliac artery aneurysm, iliac artery diameter and length, and iliac tortuosity), and adjunctive iliac artery maneuvers were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Mean CIA length was 52.8 mm (range, 6.6-98.0 mm) on the right and 56.3 mm (range, 0-94.8 mm) on the left. CIA length was ≥20 mm, except in one patient with bilateral short CIAs. Forty patients (54%) had a CIA aneurysm, and 18 had aneurysms on both sides. Iliac adjunctive procedures were performed in 38 patients (51%) as follows: 23 internal iliac artery (IIA) embolizations or ligations, seven IIA revascularizations, 16 external iliac artery (EIA) balloon angioplasties or stenting, one EIA patch angioplasty, one EIA interposition, two femoral endarterectomies with patch angioplasty, and nine femoro-femoral bypasses after EVAR with an aorto-uni-iliac device. Technical success for the adjunctive iliac procedures was achieved in all patients.

Conclusion

Short CIA length was uncommon. Although many patients had access-related difficulties, most were overcome by an endovascular or hybrid technique. Liberal use of iliac adjunctive procedures can facilitate EVAR.

Rates of adverse events and correction procedures after elective versus emergent aortouni-iliac endografting during mid-term follow-up: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Due to preferential implantation of bifurcated devices during endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), longer-term results following aortouni-iliac (AUI) endografting are scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of endoleaks as well as frequency of secondary correction procedures after elective and emergent AUI endografting.

METHODS

A prospectively gathered database at a tertiary care university hospital was retrospectively reviewed from January 2000 until January 2012. This interrogation identified 61 patients who had undergone AUI endografting to treat their AAA. Data retrieval obtained 47 patients with elective AAA repairs while 14 patients received emergent AUI endografting in case of rupture. Procedural outcomes, endoleaks, complications, and secondary interventions during mid-term follow-up were recorded for analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients of the study cohort were male (90.2%) and mean age was 76.5 years (median: 77.2, Q1-Q3: 72.1-81.6). Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural characteristics, as well as median follow-up length (39.8 months versus 34.9 months) were similar between groups. Endoleaks, complications, and rate of secondary correction procedures were not increased following emergent AUI endografting. The majority of these interventions comprised catheter-based or less invasive surgical procedures. All patients requiring major surgery (three open surgical conversions with endograft explantation and one open aortic banding) survived, while one patient sustained fatal myocardial infarction after a transluminal correction procedure.

CONCLUSION

Emergent AUI endografting was not associated with higher rates of adverse events or correction procedures during mid-term follow-up. Secondary interventions to maintain aneurysm exclusion could be carried out with low mortality.

In Situ Fenestration Through the Contralateral Iliac Artery to Convert an Aortouni-iliac Into a Bifurcated Endograft

Purpose: To present a technique of in situ fenestration that allows conversion of an aortouni-iliac endograft into a bifurcated endograft, thereby avoiding crossover femorofemoral bypass and its complications. Technique: Following conventional deployment of an aortouni-iliac endograft, in situ fenestration through the contralateral common iliac artery is performed with a transjugular intrahepatic access set. The fabric hole is enlarged using a cutting balloon and a high-pressure noncompliant balloon. Kissing iliac-covered stents are then positioned at the level of the bifurcation to convert the aortouni-iliac endograft into a bifurcated repair. To date, this technique has been successfully used in 4 patients with satisfactory short-term results. Conclusion: This technique represents another application of endograft in situ fenestration. This strategy provides a bifurcated repair in cases where bifurcated stent-grafts are usually precluded, such as a narrow distal aorta, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, or combined aortoiliac occlusive disease.

Midterm Re-interventions and Survival After Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

OBJECTIVE

To compare the midterm re-intervention and survival rates after EVAR and OR for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA).

METHODS

Observational cohort study including all consecutive RAAA patients between 2004 and 2011 in 10 hospitals in the Amsterdam ambulance region. The primary end point was re-interventions within 5 years of the primary intervention. The secondary end point was death. The outcomes were estimated by survival analyses, compared using the logrank test, and subsequently adjusted for possible confounders using Cox proportional hazard models. Re-interventions were estimated in all patients and in patients who survived their hospital stay.

RESULTS

Of 467 patients with a RAAA, 73 were treated by EVAR and 394 by OR. Five years after the primary intervention, the rates of freedom from re-intervention were 55% for EVAR (26/73, 95% CI: 41-69%) and 60% for OR (130/394, 95% CI: 55-66%) (p = .96). After adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity, and pre-operative hemodynamic stability, the risk of re-intervention was similar (HR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.65-1.55). The survival rates were 36% for EVAR (45/73, 95% CI: 24-47%) and 38% for OR (235/394, 95% CI: 33-43%) (p = .83). In 297 patients who survived their hospital stay, the rates of freedom from re-intervention were 66% for EVAR (15/54, 95% CI: 52-81%) and 90% for OR (20/243, 95% CI: 86-95%) (p < .01). After adjustment for age and sex, the risk of re-intervention was higher after EVAR (HR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.14-0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Five years after the primary intervention, endovascular and open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm resulted in similar re-intervention and survival rates. However, in patients who survived their hospital stay the re-intervention rate was higher for EVAR than for OR.

Secondary modification into aortouniiliac configuration to salvage failed endovascular aneurysm repair is safe and effective but not associated with higher intervention rates during long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Reports of secondary modifications into aortouniiliac configuration to salvage-failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are limited. We evaluated long-term results after these procedures and compared them with those after primary aortouniiliac endografting (AUE).

METHODS

A retrospective review of all EVAR performed from March 1995 until July 2011 was conducted. Patients were included when primary AUE (group I) or modification into aortouniiliac configuration (group II) was done.

RESULTS

Data analysis obtained 27 group I and 23 group II patients. Salvage of failed EVAR could be achieved in 96% of group II patients, and mortality was zero. Frequency of adverse events and amount of interventions to maintain aneurysm exclusion were not increased after secondary AUE. Kaplan-Meier estimates for long-term survival between groups were comparable (P = .36).

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary AUE allows correction of graft-related endoleaks potentially leading to late aneurysm rupture. Complications and adverse events throughout long-term follow-up were not necessarily increased when compared with primary AUE.

Back-table modification of a bifurcated infrarenal stent-graft to aortomonoiliac for emergencies

PURPOSE

To describe a simple and quick technique for converting a Zenith bifurcated stent-graft to an aortouni-iliac device for emergency treatment of hemorrhage when a suitable marketed stent-graft is not readily available.

TECHNIQUE

The technique is described in an emergent case involving a 72-year-old man presenting with an aortoduodenal fistula and acute gastrointestinal bleeding. The Zenith device was prepared and flushed in the typical fashion. An extra stiff Lunderquist wire was advanced through the graft for better stability during the modification. The peel-away sheath was advanced beyond the hemostatic valve to allow partial release of the graft from the back then the grey positioner was retracted while the sheath was held firmly on the table, partially deploying the iliac limbs from the back side of the sheath. An occluding non-absorbable braided suture was placed at the short limb of the bifurcated graft close to the middle of the contralateral limb stent, through the webbing connecting both limbs below the flow divider of the bifurcated Zenith device. The graft was then resheathed using manual pinching of the graft or compression with umbilical tape. In the illustrated case, the stent-graft was intentionally deployed with the uncovered stents below the renal arteries to facilitate easier explantation later on.

CONCLUSION

Back-table modification of stent-grafts is feasible in emergencies for operators familiar with all technical aspects and potential risks of the modifications.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm using bifurcated stent-graft in a patient with complete occlusion from the common to the external iliac artery

Extensive iliofemoral occlusive disease can limit the use of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), and the treatment strategy varies depending on severity of the lesion. In cases of mild iliac artery (IA) stenosis, predilation using a balloon catheter before EVAR is relatively common, and for severe IA stenosis, the technique of internal endoconduits has been reported with good results. In contrast, EVAR using an aortouni-iliac stent graft with femorofemoral crossover bypass has traditionally been used for abdominal aortic aneurysm with IA occlusion. However, EVAR using a bifurcated stent graft has some clear advantages over aortouni-iliac stent grafts. In this report, we describe and discuss technical aspects and feasibility of chronically occluded iliac artery recanalization before EVAR to facilitate the use of bifurcated stent grafts in a patient with concomitant complete common to external IA occlusion.

Crossover ilio-iliac bypass and removal of femoro-femoral graft as first treatment for the infection of crossover bypass in aorto-uni-iliac endovascular aneurysm repair

The crossover femoro-femoral bypass, classically used for the treatment of unilateral iliac arterial obstruction, has recently become an integral part of aorto-uni-iliac endovascular aneurysm repair. We therefore, reconsider the therapeutic problems related to thrombosis and in particular to infection of the femoro-femoral prosthesis, when many attempts have been made to preserve the bypass and treat the infection. Showing a case treated and well eight months later, we put forward the old technique of crossover ilio-iliac bypass, followed by the removal of the infected femoro-femoral graft. In our opinion, this technique circumvents the need for autologous tissue and allows for the use of prosthetics in a new, sterile, uncontaminated field. As this approach for these cases has so far not been reported in the literature, further cases and long-term follow-up are needed.

Quality improvement guidelines for imaging detection and treatment of endoleaks following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)

Major concerns after aortic aneurysm repair are caused by the presence of endoleaks, which are defined as persistent perigraft flow within the aortic aneurysm sac. Diagnosis of endoleaks can be performed with various imaging modalities, and indications for treatment are based on further subclassifications. Early detection and correct classification of endoleaks are crucial for planning patient management. The vast majority of endoleaks can be treated successfully by interventional means. Guidelines for Imaging Detection and Treatment of endoleaks are described in this article.

Antegrade, covered, self-expanding stent as an iliac extension in a bifurcated endograft: a feasible technical maneuver for challenging aortoiliac aneurysmal anatomy

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal and occlusive aortoiliac disease can make the process of introducing large delivery catheters for endovascular repair challenging. We describe the case of a patient who could be treated by a bifurcated stent-graft despite having a unilateral external iliac occlusion.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From a brachial access, a covered self-expanding stent was deployed antegradely through the distal gate of the stent-graft into the common iliac artery. This technical choice helped to overcome the problem of an external iliac occlusion, so as to maintain an antegrade flow into the internal iliac and avoid the need for an interfemoral bypass.

CONCLUSION

Auto-expandable covered stent-graft with a thinner shaft can be used through a brachial access as an iliac extension of a bifurcated aortic endograft. However, a longer follow-up duration and more cases are necessary to warrant the safety and the durability of such an "off-label" endovascular material assemblage.

Incidence and Survival Outcome Following Femoral Artery Reconstruction During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background: Planned or unplanned reconstruction of the common femoral artery (femoro-femoral crossover and/or patch closure) may be required following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) stent graft deployment for arterial closure or maintenance of limb perfusion. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence of common femoral artery reconstruction (FAR) following EVAR and examine the effect on patient survival. Methods: A total of 178 patients undergoing EVAR were studied retrospectively. Results: In all, 31 patients (17.4%) underwent FAR; 16 (51.6%) femoro-femoral crossover, and 15 (48.4%) endarterectomy and patch closure. All cause survival in patients undergoing FAR was significantly poorer than those undergoing direct closure (P = .010).A total of 3 factors: the need for FAR (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.435, P = .006), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] HR = 0.424, P = .002), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size (HR = 1.414, P = .005) were significantly and independently associated with survival on forward conditional analysis. Conclusions: Femoral artery reconstruction was performed in almost 1 in 5 patients undergoing EVAR and associated with decreased survival. Multidisciplinary teams should be aware of these findings when planning EVAR, especially in borderline candidates.

Use of baseline factors to predict complications and reinterventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain which baseline factors are associated with graft-related complications and reinterventions after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with a large abdominal aortic aneurysm.

METHODS

Patients randomized to elective EVAR in EVAR Trial 1 or 2 were followed for serious graft-related complications (type 2 endoleaks excluded) and reinterventions. Cox regression analysis was used to investigate whether any prespecified baseline factors were associated with time to first serious complication or reintervention.

RESULTS

A total of 756 patients who had elective EVAR were followed for a mean of 3.7 years, by which time there were 179 serious graft complications (rate 6.5 per 100 person years) and 114 reinterventions (rate 3.8 per 100 person years). The highest rate was during the first 6 months, with an apparent increase again after 2 years. Multivariable analysis indicated that graft-related complications increased significantly with larger initial aneurysm diameter (P < 0.001) and older age (P = 0.040). There was also evidence that patients with larger common iliac diameters experienced higher complication rates (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Graft-related complication and reintervention rates were common after EVAR in patients with a large aneurysm. Younger patients and those with aneurysms closer to the 5.5-cm threshold for intervention experienced lower rates.