Diameter of the Infrarenal Aorta as a Risk Factor for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: The Tromsø Study, 1994–2001

A Ratio Between Infrarenal and Suprarenal Aortic Diameters Corrects for Absolute Aortic Diameter Variations due to Patients' Sex and Body Size

OBJECTIVES

Aortic diameters may differ significantly between patients with different gender and body size. The aim of this study was to relate absolute aortic diameters to age, sex, height, and weight of the patients and to correct for these factors by calculating the ratio between the infrarenal and the suprarenal aortic diameters.

METHODS

A total of 458 patients who underwent elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between 2004 and 2018 were included. The aortic anatomy in this group of elective EVAR patients was compared with a control group of 75 patients without an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aortic diameter was measured at 4 suprarenal points and 4 infrarenal points. Ratios were calculated by dividing the mean infrarenal neck diameter by 4 suprarenal measurements.

RESULTS

Patients in the aneurysm group had significantly larger suprarenal and infrarenal aortic diameters. The ratios between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and all 4 suprarenal measurements were larger in the AAA group than in the control group. In both groups, there was a significant correlation between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and sex, height, weight, and body surface area (BSA). However, in both groups, all 4 ratios between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and suprarenal aortic diameters were not correlated with age, sex, height, weight, or BSA, except for the ratio between the mean infrarenal neck diameter and the aortic diameter measurement proximal to the upper renal artery, which was correlated to weight and BSA in the control group.

CONCLUSION

The mean infrarenal neck diameter is correlated with sex, height, weight, and BSA. However, when the suprarenal aortic diameter was used as an internal control for the mean infrarenal neck diameter, we were able to correct for these variations in aortic diameters due to sex and body size. The clinical relevance of this ratio in patients treated by EVAR has yet to be assessed in future research.

CLINICAL IMPACT

In the assessment for EVAR suitability the absolute diameter of the aneurysm neck is taken into account. We believe that using absolute diameters is not the appropriate way to assess this suitability, but that patient characteristics such as age, gender and body size, should be factored into this assessment. In this paper, we show that suprarenal and infrarenal aortic diameters are both significantly increased in patients with an aneurysm compared with patients without an aneurysm. Besides, we found that mean infrarenal aortic diameter is correlated with sex, height, weight, and body surface area. Finally, we propose a new ratio system, using suprarenal diameters as an internal control, to correct for aortic diameter variations due to sex and body size.

Reference Normal Diameters of the Abdominal Aorta and Common Iliac Arteries in the Saudi Population

The abdominal aorta is the largest artery in the abdomen. It then bifurcates giving the two common iliac arteries. Knowing the normal abdominal aorta diameter is a basis for diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and subsequently developing an optimal management plan. In order to diagnose AAA, one must have a reference for the normal abdominal aortic diameter that represents the anatomical variation in the population being studied. The aim of this research is to establish normal abdominal aortic diameters in the Saudi population.

Potential influencing factors of aortic diameter at specific segments in population with cardiovascular risk

Background

Aortic diameter is a critical parameter for the diagnosis of aortic dilated diseases. Aortic dilation has some common risk factors with cardiovascular diseases. This study aimed to investigate potential influence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and the measures of subclinical atherosclerosis on aortic diameter of specific segments among adults.

Methods

Four hundred and eight patients with cardiovascular risk factors were prospectively recruited in the observational study. Comprehensive transthoracic M-mode, 2-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed using commercial and clinical diagnostic ultrasonography techniques. The aortic dimensions were assessed at different levels: (1) the annulus, (2) the mid-point of the sinuses of Valsalva, (3) the sinotubular junction, (4) the ascending aorta at the level of its largest diameter, (5) the transverse arch (including proximal arch, mid arch, distal arch), (6) the descending aorta posterior to the left atrium, and (7) the abdominal aorta just distal to the origin of the renal arteries. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used for evaluating aortic diameter-related risk factors, including common cardiovascular risk factors, co-morbidities, subclinical atherosclerosis, lipid profile, and hematological parameters.

Results

Significant univariate relations were found between aortic diameter of different levels and most traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Carotid intima-media thickness was significantly correlated with diameter of descending and abdominal aorta. Multivariate linear regression showed potential effects of age, sex, body surface area and some other cardiovascular risk factors on aortic diameter enlargement. Among them, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol had a significantly positive effect on the diameter of ascending and abdominal aorta. Diastolic blood pressure was observed for the positive associations with diameters of five thoracic aortic segments, while systolic blood pressure was only independently related to mid arch diameter.

Conclusion

Aortic segmental diameters were associated with diastolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, atherosclerosis diseases and other traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and some determinants still need to be clarified for a better understanding of aortic dilation diseases.

Sex-specific normal values and determinants of infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter among non-aneurysmal elderly population

To establish age- and sex-specific distribution of the infrarenal abdominal aortic diameters (IAD) among non-aneurysmal elderly population and to investigate the associations between traditional cardiovascular risk factors and IAD in men and women. We included 4032 participants (mean age 67.2 years; 60.4% women) from the population-based Rotterdam Study, free of cardiovascular disease, who underwent IAD ultrasound assessment between 2009-2014. Linear regression analysis was used to identify determinants of IAD. The medians (inter-quartile range) of absolute IAD and body surface area (BSA)-adjusted IAD were 17.0 (15.0-18.0) mm and 9.3 (8.5-10.2) mm for women and 19.0 (18.0-21.0) mm and 9.4 (8.6-10.3) mm for men, respectively. There was a non-linear relationship between age and IAD. IAD increased steeply with advancing age and up to 70 years. After around 75 years of age, the diameter values reached a plateau. Waist circumference and diastolic blood pressure were associated with larger diameters in both sexes. Body mass index [Effect estimate (95% CI): 0.04 (0.00 to 0.08)], systolic blood pressure [- 0.01(- 0.02 to 0.00)], current smoking [0.35 (0.06 to 0.65)], total cholesterol levels [- 0.21 (- 0.31 to - 0.11)], and lipid-lowering medication [- 0.43 (- 0.67 to - 0.19)] were significantly associated with IAD in women. Sex differences in IAD values diminished after taking BSA into account. The increase in diameters was attenuated after 70 years. Differences were observed in the associations of several cardiovascular risk factors with IAD among men and women.

Is the aortic size index relevant as a predictor of abdominal aortic aneurysm? A population-based prospective study: the Tromsø study

Objectives. The normal aortic diameter (AD) varies with gender, age and body surface area (BSA). The aortic size index (ASI) is defined as the AD divided by BSA. The primary aim of this study was to investigate if ASI is a predictor of development AAA, and to compare the predictive impact of ASI to that of the absolute AD. Design. Population-based prospective study including 4161 individuals (53.2% women) from the Tromsø study with two valid ultrasound measurements of the AD and no AAA at baseline (Tromsø 4, 1994). The primary outcome was AAA (AD ≥30 mm) in Tromsø 5 (2001). A secondary outcome was aortic growth of >5 mm over 7 years. Estimates of relative risk were calculated in logistic regression models. The main exposure variable was ASI. Adjustments were made for age, gender, smoking, body mass index, total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and hypertension. Results. In total, 124 incident AAAs (20% among women) were detected. In adjusted analyses, both ASI and AD were strong predictors of AAA, with similar results for men and women. Both ASI and AD were also significant predictors of aortic growth >5 mm. In comparison, AD was superior to ASI as a predictor of both endpoints. Conclusions. ASI was a significant predictor of both AAA development and aortic growth of >5 mm for both men and women, but not a better predictor of either outcomes compared to the AD. The role of ASI compared to the AD as a predictor of AAA development seems to be limited.

A novel method for describing biomechanical properties of the aortic wall based on the three-dimensional fluid-structure interaction model

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to present a novel non-invasive approach for assessment of aortic wall displacement to describe its biomechanical properties during the cardiac cycle.

METHODS

The fluid-structure interaction (FSI) technique was used to reconstruct aortic wall displacement based on computed tomography angiography and 2-dimensional speckle-tracking technique (2DSTT) data collected from 20 patients [10 with healthy aortas (AA) and 10 with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs)]. The mechanical properties of the wall of the aorta were described by the Yeoh hyperelastic materials model with α and β parameters, and wall displacement was determined with 2DSTT. The mechanical parameters of the wall of the aorta in the FSI model were automatically updated in the calculation loop until the calculated and clinically measured wall movements were the same.

RESULTS

Results showed 98% accuracy of FSI compared to 2DSTT for AA and AAA (P > 0.05). The mean wall deformation for AA was 2.45 ± 0.12 mm and 2.49 ± 0.10 mm for FSI and 2DSTT, respectively (P = 0.40), whereas that for AAA was 2.84 ± 0.44 mm and 2.88 ± 0.45 mm, respectively (P = 0.83). The FSI analysis indicated that the α and β parameters for AA were equal to 14.35 ± 1.30 N⋅cm-2 and 9.33 ± 1.08 N⋅cm-2, respectively; and for AAA, α was 11.00 ± 0.49 N⋅cm-2 and β was 79.46 ± 4.32 N⋅cm-2.

CONCLUSIONS

The FSI technique may be successfully applied to assess the mechanical parameters of patient-specific aortic walls using computed tomography angiographic and 2DSTT measurements.

Thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters in a general population: MRI-based reference values and association with age and cardiovascular risk factors

OBJECTIVES

To generate reference values for thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and analyse their association with cardiovascular risk factors in the general population.

METHODS

Data from participants (n = 1759) of the Study of Health in Pomerania were used for analysis in this study. MRI measurement of thoracic and abdominal aortic diameters was performed. Parameters for calculation of reference values according to age and sex analysis were provided. Multivariable linear regression models were used for determination of aortic diameter-related risk factors, including smoking, blood pressure (BP), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C).

RESULTS

For the ascending aorta (β = -0.049, p < 0.001), the aortic arch (β = -0.061, p < 0.001) and the subphrenic aorta (β = -0.018, p = 0.004), the body surface area (BSA)-adjusted diameters were lower in men. Multivariable-adjusted models revealed significant increases in BSA-adjusted diameters with age for all six aortic segments (p < 0.001). Consistent results for all segments were observed for the positive associations of diastolic BP (β = 0.001; 0.004) and HDL (β = 0.035; 0.087) with BSA-adjusted aortic diameters and for an inverse association of systolic BP (β = -0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Some BSA-adjusted median aortic diameters are smaller in men than in women. All diameters increase with age, diastolic blood pressure and HDL-C and decrease as systolic BP increases.

KEY POINTS

• Median aortic diameter increases with age and diastolic blood pressure. • Median aortic diameter is larger in men than in women. • Some BSA-adjusted median aortic diameters are smaller in men than in women.

Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on abdominal aortic diameters

Although obesity has been reported to be a potential risk factor for abdominal aortic dilatation, the impact of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) on the abdominal aortic diameter remains unknown. We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients aged >45 years who underwent polysomnography and abdominal computed tomography from November 2008 to February 2012. Aortic diameters were measured at 3 locations: upper, infrarenal, and lower abdominal aorta. OSA was defined as non-OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] <10, n = 58), mild to moderate (AHI 10 to 30, n = 167), and severe (AHI ≥30, n = 202). Adjusted diameter was not significantly different among OSA severity categories at the upper (21.0, 21.3, and 21.4 mm, respectively) and infrarenal aorta (19.5, 20.2, and 19.9 mm, respectively) but was significantly different at the lower abdominal aorta (17.3, 18.2, and 18.2 mm, respectively, p = 0.006) with larger diameters in patients with OSA. Multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that risk profiles for aortic dilatation varied according to the location and gender and that OSA (AHI ≥10) was an independent risk factor for infrarenal and lower abdominal aortic dilatation only in men (β = 0.10 and 0.18, p = 0.049 and 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, OSA may enhance dilatation of the distal abdominal aorta in men.

Task force on: 'Early markers of atherosclerosis: influence of age and sex'

Atherosclerosis and its complications are the most important causes of death all over the world, especially in Western countries. Diet habits, modern stress life, smoking, sedentary way of life and an involvement of genetic pattern of individuals lead to a sure degeneration of quality of life increasing the risk of atherosclerosis development. For this reason, the main purpose of actual medicine is to identify all the markers that could allow the physicians to evaluate the first moments of the development of this dangerous pathological process. The aim is to reduce the speed of its evolution, trying to delay indefinitely the risk coming from the morphological alterations of the vessels. 'Endothelium function' could allow physicians to detect the first moment of the natural history of atherosclerosis process. Its impairment is the first step in the degeneration of vascular structures. Many methods [flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD); antero-posterior abdominal aorta diameter (APAO); intima-media thickness of the common carotid artery (CCA-IMT); arterial stiffness; and so on] try to evaluate its function, but many limitations come from general population characteristics. A standardization of the methods should take into account individuals' peculiarities. Two elements, not modifiable, should be taken into account for vascular evaluation: age and sex. The aim of this review is to outline the linkage among age, sex and instrumental evaluation of patients considered for a noninvasive assessment of their cardiovascular risk profile.

Interaction between widening of diameter of abdominal aorta and cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis burden

The aim of this study was to investigate influence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and subclinical atherosclerosis (ATS) burden on early stages of abdominal aortic diameter (AAD) widening among adults. 2,052 consecutive patients (P) (39 % women), mean age 52 ± 13 years, were prospectively screened for CVRF, ATS, and AAD. B-mode ultrasound was used to evaluate the largest AAD and to detect carotid and femoral atherosclerotic plaques. Mean AAD was 15.2 ± 2.8 mm. Atherosclerotic plaques were detected in 71 % of patients. Significant univariate correlation between AAD, traditional CVRF, and ABS was found. However, multiple regression analysis showed that only seven of them were significantly and weakly correlated with AAD (R² = 0.27, p < 0.001). On the other hand, a multivariate logistic analysis was used to evaluate CVRF impact on enlarged AAD ≥25 mm (EAAD) as compared to those with AAD <25 mm. These factors did not account for more than 30 % of interaction (R² = 0.30, p = 0.001). Furthermore, despite a large proportion of patients with high number of CVRF, and subclinical ATS, rate of patients with AAD ≥25 mm was low (1 %) and scattered regardless their CHD risk score or ATS burden. In conclusion, these results suggest that although some traditional CVRF and presence of ATS are associated with early stages of EAAD, other determinants still need to be identified for a better understanding of abdominal aortic aneurysm pathogenesis.

The role of geometric and biomechanical factors in abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk assessment

The current clinical management of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) disease is based to a great extent on measuring the aneurysm maximum diameter to decide when timely intervention is required. Decades of clinical evidence show that aneurysm diameter is positively associated with the risk of rupture, but other parameters may also play a role in causing or predisposing the AAA to rupture. Geometric factors such as vessel tortuosity, intraluminal thrombus volume, and wall surface area are implicated in the differentiation of ruptured and unruptured AAAs. Biomechanical factors identified by means of computational modeling techniques, such as peak wall stress, have been positively correlated with rupture risk with a higher accuracy and sensitivity than maximum diameter alone. The objective of this review is to examine these factors, which are found to influence AAA disease progression, clinical management and rupture potential, as well as to highlight on-going research by our group in aneurysm modeling and rupture risk assessment.

[Infrarenal aortic ectasia in retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF)]

We analysed the infrarenal aortic morphology by abdominal MR-examinations of 47 RPF patients compared to a control group. A significant larger aortic calibre and higher rates of infrarenal dilatation in male RPF patients were observed. The larger aortic diameter in male RPF patients may be due to periaortic inflammation with resulting aortic ectasia and supports the classification of RPF into the spectrum of chronic periaortitis.

Cost-effectiveness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the Netherlands and Norway

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in men aged 65 years, for both the Netherlands and Norway.

Methods

A Markov model was developed to simulate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life-years, net health benefits, lifetime costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for both screening and no screening for AAA. The best available evidence was retrieved from the literature and combined with primary data from the two countries separately, and analysed from a national perspective. A threshold willingness-to-pay (WTP) of €20 000 and €62 500 was used for data from the Netherlands and Norway respectively.

Results

The additional costs of the screening strategy compared with no screening were €421 (95 per cent confidence interval 33 to 806) per person in the Netherlands, and the additional life-years were 0·097 (−0·180 to 0·365), representing €4340 per life-year. For Norway, the values were €562 (59 to 1078), 0·057 (−0·135 to 0·253) life-years and €9860 per life-year respectively. In Norway the results were sensitive to a decrease in the prevalence of AAA in 65-year-old men to 1 per cent, or lower. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that AAA screening has a 70 per cent probability of being cost-effective in the Netherlands with a WTP threshold of €20 000, and 70 per cent in Norway with a threshold of €62 500.

Conclusion

Using this model, screening for AAA in 65-year-old men would be highly cost-effective in both the Netherlands and Norway.