Reliability of Ultrasound Diameter Measurements in Patients with a Small Asymptomatic Popliteal Artery Aneurysm: An Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement Study

In vivo noninvasive systemic myography of acute systemic vasoactivity in female pregnant mice

Altered vasoactivity is a major characteristic of cardiovascular and oncological diseases, and many therapies are therefore targeted to the vasculature. Therapeutics which are selective for the diseased vasculature are ideal, but whole-body selectivity of a therapeutic is challenging to assess in practice. Vessel myography is used to determine the functional mechanisms and evaluate pharmacological responses of vascularly-targeted therapeutics. However, myography can only be performed on ex vivo sections of individual arteries. We have developed methods for implementation of spherical-view photoacoustic tomography for non-invasive and in vivo myography. Using photoacoustic tomography, we demonstrate the measurement of acute vascular reactivity in the systemic vasculature and the placenta of female pregnant mice in response to two vasodilators. Photoacoustic tomography simultaneously captures the significant acute vasodilation of major arteries and detects selective vasoactivity of the maternal-fetal vasculature. Photoacoustic tomography has the potential to provide invaluable preclinical information on vascular response that cannot be obtained by other established methods.

Reliability of Ultrasound Imaging in Examining Integrity and Inflammation in the Dorsalis Pedis Artery

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of small vessel inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid vasculitis is challenging. Small arteries such as the dorsalis pedis artery (DPA) are difficult to assess for changes in the arterial wall with medical imaging. Ultrasound imaging is a viable tool for examining the integrity and inflammatory changes in the arterial wall; however, no empirical data on its reliability have been described.

METHODS

We measured the intra- and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound measurements across five parameters evaluating arterial integrity of the proximal DPA in participants with and without small vessel disease. We recruited 10 participants with rheumatoid arthritis and 10 healthy controls. Two sonographers using ultrasound independently measured DPA lumen diameter, artery diameter, lumen-to-arterial diameter ratio, arterial Doppler velocity and inflammatory changes in the proximal wall of the DPA. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate 95% confidence intervals within and between raters. Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess limits of agreement and were compared with minimal clinically important differences (MCID).

RESULTS

Four of five selected parameters were found to have excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability within and between raters (ICC = 0.903-0.996). Acceptable reliability was found for measurement of arterial blood flow velocity within raters (ICC = 0.815-0.909), but not between raters (ICC = 0.634). Standard mean errors in all parameters were within minimal clinically important differences.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound imaging has been found to be a reliable method of assessment of arterial integrity and inflammation of the proximal DPA in people with small vessel disease. Evaluation of arterial blood flow velocity requires cautious interpretation.

Radiologic assessment of abdominal aortic calcifications, atherosclerotic burden levels and statistical bias affecting the reliability

INTRODUCTION

AAC-8 and AAC-24 are two widely used scales to evaluate abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) on X-ray images. Levels of ≥3 (AAC-8) and ≥5 points (AAC-24) are of high relevance since they are associated with greater risk of cardiovascular events. Given that it is unknown, our aim was to determine the reliability of both scales at those levels of atherosclerotic burden.

METHODS

The sample (93 subjects, 67.3 ± 9.7 years, BMI 28.8 ± 3.8, 57.6% smokers, 64.1% with hypertension) was classified according to quartiles of calcification. Six clinicians evaluated AAC independently with both scales on lateral lumbar spine X-ray images. We analyzed inter-rater agreement with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman scatterplots.

RESULTS

We assessed 15 pairs of raters. Scores in both scales were significantly correlated with cardiovascular risk (r = 0.31 and r = 0.32; p < 0.005). Agreement was very high in the first quartile and moderate in the rest (p < 0.05). At cut-off points, ICC = 0.70 (95%CI, 0.54-0.86) and ICC = 0.68 (95%CI, 0.60-0.85) with AAC-8 and AAC-24. With the Bland-Altman method, mean of the differences ranged between 0 and 0.4 (AAC-8), and between 0.2 and 1 (AAC-24), while 95% limits of agreement showed values between 2.9 and 4.4 (AAC-8), and between 6 and 11.2 (AAC-24). Analyzing entire scales, ICC = 0.97 (95%CI, 0.97-0.98) and ICC = 0.98 (95%CI, 0.97-0.98) for AAC-8 and AAC-24, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both scales presented only moderate reliability at levels of atherosclerotic burden. Analyzing quartiles with ICC and the Bland-Altman plot showed concordant results. High global ICC values traditionally reported with both scales are likely biased.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

AAC predicts subsequent vascular morbidity and mortality and should implicate evaluation of cardiovascular risk. Optimal visualisation of AAC and its correct assessment are mandatory in order to maximize patient care.

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in sonographic size measurements of gallbladder polyps

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of gallbladder polyp measurements using transabdominal US and the factors that affect reliability.

METHODS

From November 2017 to February 2018, two radiologists measured the maximum diameter of 91 gallbladder polyps using transabdominal US. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement were determined using 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The effects of image settings, polyp location, and polyp size were evaluated by comparing ICCs using z tests.

RESULTS

The intraobserver agreement rates were 0.960 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.939-0.973) for observer 1 and 0.962 (95% CI, 0.943-0.975) for observer 2. The ICCs between the two observers were 0.963 (95% CI, 0.926-0.979) for the first measurement and 0.973 (95% CI, 0.950-0.984) for the second measurement. The 95% limits of agreement on repeated measurements were 22.3-25.2% of the mean, and those between the two observers were 25.5-34.2% of the mean. ICCs for large polyps (≥ 5 mm) were significantly higher than those for small polyps (< 5 mm). There were no significant differences in the ICCs between image settings and polyp location.

CONCLUSIONS

Polyp size measurements using transabdominal US are highly repeatable and reproducible. Polyp size significantly affects the reliability of measurement. Diameter changes of approximately less than 25% may fall within the measurement error; this should be considered while interpreting the change in size during follow-up US, especially for small polyps.

KEY POINTS

• Gallbladder polyp size measurement using transabdominal US is highly repeatable and reproducible. • Diameter changes of approximately less than 25% should be interpreted carefully, especially in small polyps.