Outcomes of Stent Placement for Chronic Occlusion of a Filter-bearing Inferior Vena Cava in Patients with Severe Post-thrombotic Syndrome

Femoral vein stenting versus endovenectomy as adjuncts to iliofemoral venous stenting in extensive chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

PURPOSE

To compare femoral endovenectomy with the creation of an arteriovenous fistula (FE + AVF), versus iliofemoral endovenous stenting with the concurrent extended femoral vein (FV-S) stenting in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (IFVO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a randomized prospective single-center study, 48 received (FV-S), while the other 54 had (FE + AVF).

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the two groups (FV-S) and (FE + AVF) (59% vs 56.8%, 75% vs 79.1%, respectively). At a median of 13 months after the treatment. However, the FV-S group's patients experienced fewer postoperative problems (p = .012), shorter procedures (p = .001), and shorter stays in the hospital (p = .025).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference between the efficacy and symptomatic resolution of the FV-S group and the FE + AVF group at the same time, FV-S has lower postoperative complications and a shorter procedure duration and hospital stay.

Clinical Outcomes at 3 Years After Stenting for Thrombotic and Non-thrombotic Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome Patients

Iliac vein stenting for the treatment of iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) has been gradually developed. This article investigated the long-term patency and improvement of clinical symptoms after endovascular stenting for iliac vein obstruction patients. From 2020 to 2022, 83 patients at a single institution with IVCS underwent venous stent implantation and were divided into two groups: non-thrombotic IVCS (n = 55) and thrombotic IVCS (n = 28). The main stent-related outcomes include technical success, long-term patency, and thrombotic events. The technical success rate of all stent implantation was 100%. The mean length of hospital stay and cost were higher in the thrombotic IVCS group than in the non-thrombotic ICVS group, as well as the length of diseased vessel segment and the number of stents implanted were higher than in the control non-thrombotic group. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year patency rates were 85.4%, 80% and 66.7% in the thrombosis group, which were lower than 93.6%, 88.7%, and 87.5% in the control group (P = .0135, hazard ratio = 2.644). In addition, patients in both groups had a foreign body sensation after stent implantation, which resolved spontaneously within 1 year after surgery. Overall, there were statistically significant differences in long-term patency rate outcome between patients with thrombotic and non-thrombotic IVCS, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year patency rates in non-thrombotic IVCS patients were higher than those in thrombotic IVCS patients.

Stenting across inferior vena cava filters can be a safe and effective alternative to complex retrieval

OBJECTIVE

Venous stenting for acute and chronic venous disease has been increasingly used as more evidence has accumulated on the efficacy and durability of these interventions for symptomatic patients. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters that could have been present for years will often be implicated in the obstructive pathology and removal can be challenging. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether stenting across an indwelling IVC filter is a safe and effective alternative to removal.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who had undergone iliocaval stenting at our institution from 2007 to 2020 were identified and divided into groups stratified by the presence of an IVC filter. The operative notes, venography findings, and the electronic health records were queried to obtain the operative details, patient characteristics, postoperative outcomes, stent patency, and survival outcomes. The primary end point was iliocaval stent patency. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of an IVC filter with or without overstenting. We used the χ2 test and survival analysis as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 224 consecutive patients were identified, of whom 71 were found to have undergone iliocaval stenting (age, 48 ± 18 years; 47.9% male; body mass index, 31 ± 9 kg/m2). Of the 71 patients, 15 had had stents placed across an indwelling IVC filter (overstented group) and 56 had not had an IVC filter present (non-overstented group). No differences were found in presentation between the overstented group (acute occlusion, 4 of 15 [26.7%]; chronic occlusion, 8 of 15 [53.3%]; and nonocclusive lesions, 3 of 15 [20%]) and the non-overstented group (acute occlusion, 29 of 56 [52%]; chronic occlusion, 18 of 56 [32%]; nonocclusive lesions, 9 of 56 [16%]; P = .2). Comparisons between the two groups revealed no differences in the baseline characteristics except for age (overstented, 57 ± 15 years; non-overstented, 46 ± 18 years; P = 0.03), preoperative anticoagulation therapy (overstented, 66.6%; non-overstented, 26.9%; P = .01), and bilateral leg symptoms (overstented, 86.7%; non-overstented, 23.2%; P < .001). Primary patency at 30 months was 85.6% in the overstented group and 86.1% in the non-overstented group (P = .78). At follow-up, no adverse events related to filter crushing were reported, and no differences were found in 30-month survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In our single-center, retrospective study of iliocaval stenting, patients who had undergone overstenting across an indwelling IVC filter had had patency rates similar to those whose stents had been placed with no IVC filter in place. Thus, complex IVC filter removal, when not possible or when the risk of operative complications is too high, can be forgone in favor of stenting across the IVC filter, with no implications on midterm patency or adverse events.

A Systematic Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Inferior Vena Cava Stenting

OBJECTIVE

Inferior vena cava (IVC) stenting may provide benefit to patients with symptomatic obstruction; however, there are no devices currently licensed for use in the IVC and systematic reviews on the topic are lacking. The aim of this study was to carry out a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of IVC stenting in all adult patient groups.

DATA SOURCES

The Medline and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes for safety and effectiveness of IVC stenting for any indication in series of 10 or more patients.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included describing 1 575 patients. Indications for stenting were malignant IVC syndrome (229 patients), thrombotic disease (807 patients), Budd-Chiari syndrome (501 patients), and IVC stenosis post liver transplantation (47 patients). The male:female ratio was 2:1 and the median age ranged from 30 to 61 years. The studies included were not suitable for formal meta-analysis as 30/33 were single centre retrospective studies with no control groups and there was considerable inconsistency in outcome reporting. There was significant risk of bias in 94% of studies. Median reported technical success was 100% (range 78 - 100%), primary patency was 75% (38 - 98%), and secondary patency was 91.5% (77 - 100%). Major complications were pulmonary embolism (three cases), stent migration (12 cases), and major bleeding (15 cases), and there were three deaths in the immediate post-operative period. Most studies reported improvement in clinical symptoms but formal reporting tools were not used consistently.

CONCLUSION

The evidence base for IVC stenting consists of predominantly single centre, retrospective, observational studies that have a high risk of bias. Nonetheless the procedure appears safe with few major adverse events, and studies that reported clinical outcomes demonstrate improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Randomised controlled trials and prospective registry based studies with larger patient numbers and standardised outcome are required to improve the evidence base for this procedure.

Iliocaval Reconstruction: Review of Technique, Challenges, and Outcomes

Iliocaval thrombosis is a major source of morbidity for patients, with a range of clinical presentations, including recurrent lower extremity deep venous thrombosis and postthrombotic syndrome. Endovascular reconstruction of chronic iliocaval occlusion has been demonstrated to be a technically feasible procedure that provides long-lasting symptom relief in combination with antithrombotic therapy and close clinical monitoring. Herein, we describe the etiologies of iliocaval thrombosis, patient assessment, patient management prior to and after intervention, procedural techniques, and patient outcomes.

Feasibility of Endovascular Recanalization in Post-Thrombotic Syndrome of Intentionally Interrupted Inferior Vena Cava

PURPOSE

Surgical plication of inferior vena cava was commonly used until the 1980s for prevention of pulmonary embolism, associated with high incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). This study aims to assess the feasibility and safety of endovascular iliocaval recanalization after intentionally surgically interrupted inferior vena cava by external plicating clip.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Endovascular iliocaval recanalizations in relation to previous vena cava clip plication were extracted from the retrospective French multicentre database and further analysed. All procedure data were retrospectively reviewed, including technical aspects, technical success and outcomes (clinical response and ultrasound stent patency).

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2018, 8 patients from 4 different centres underwent endovascular iliocaval recanalization for PTS in relation to previous caval interruption by clip. Recanalization of iliocaval occlusion through the clip and stent reconstruction were successfully performed for all of them without complications. After angioplasty, plicating clip was opened in U shape (n = 3) or ovalized without significant residual stenosis (n = 5). Patency of the inferior vena cava was maintained for all patients with a mean follow-up of almost two years after stenting. All patients clinically improved.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small cases series, endovascular recanalization and stenting of surgical vena cava clip plication seem technically feasible without morbidity. Restoration of blood flow through the iliocaval occlusion, using non-invasive endovascular technique, even as late treatment may be durable, with improvement of patient's venous symptoms.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4, Short Communication.

Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis Involving the Inferior Vena Cava: Interventional Perspectives

Extension of an iliofemoral thrombosis into the inferior vena cava (IVC), or from the IVC descending into the iliofemoral segments, can confer significant morbidity and mortality. Interventional management of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been controversial, but there is little doubt that certain subpopulations benefit, such as those with symptomatic IVC thrombosis. When considering an intervention, caval involvement introduces technical difficulties due to its larger diameter, high thrombus burden, bilateral limb clot extension and need for dual access. The frequent coexistence of an IVC filter increases the complexity even more. This review summarises the current indications and treatment modalities available for the management of acute DVT involving the vena cava.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 12-Month Patency After Intervention for Iliofemoral Obstruction Using Dedicated or Non-Dedicated Venous Stents

BACKGROUND

Endovascular stenting of the deep venous system has been proposed as a method to treat patients with symptomatic iliofemoral outflow obstruction. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of this treatment at 1-year following the development of dedicated venous stents.

METHOD AND RESULTS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies evaluating the effectiveness of venous stent placement. Data were extracted by disease pathogenesis: non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVL), acute thrombotic (DVT), or post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Main outcomes included technical success, stent patency at 1 year and symptom relief. A total of 49 studies reporting outcomes in 5154 patients (NIVL, 1431; DVT, 950; PTS, 2773) were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success rates were comparable among groups (97%-100%). There were no periprocedural deaths. Minor bleeding was reported in up to 5% of patients and major bleeding in 0.5% upon intervention. Transient back pain was noted in 55% of PTS patients following intervention. There was significant heterogeneity between studies reporting outcomes in PTS patients. Primary and cumulative patency at 1 year was: NIVL-96% and 100%; DVT-91% and 97%; PTS (stents above the ligament)-77% and 94%, and; PTS (stents across the ligament)-78% and 94%. There were insufficient data to compare patency outcomes of dedicated and nondedicated venous stents in patients with acute DVT. In NIVL and PTS patients, stent patency was comparable at 1 year. There was inconsistency in the use of validated tools for the measurement of symptoms before and after intervention. When reported, venous claudication, improved in 83% of PTS patients and 90% of NIVL patients, and ulcer healing occurred in 80% of PTS patients and 32% of NIVL patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The first generation of dedicated venous stents perform comparably in terms of patency and clinical outcomes to non-dedicated technologies at 1 year for the treatment of patients with NIVL and PTS. However, significant heterogeneity exists between studies and standardized criteria are urgently needed to report outcomes in patients undergoing deep venous stenting.

Optimal Medical Therapy Following Deep Venous Interventions: Proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Research Consensus Panel

The optimal medical management of patients following endovascular deep venous interventions remains ill-defined. As such, the Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation (SIRF) convened a multidisciplinary group of experts in a virtual Research Consensus Panel (RCP) to develop a prioritized research agenda regarding antithrombotic therapy following deep venous interventions. The panelists presented the gaps in knowledge followed by discussion and ranking of research priorities based on clinical relevance, overall impact, and technical feasibility. The following research topics were identified as high priority: 1) characterization of biological processes leading to in-stent stenosis/rethrombosis; 2) identification and validation of methods to assess venous flow dynamics and their effect on stent failure; 3) elucidation of the role of inflammation and anti-inflammatory therapies; and 4) clinical studies to compare antithrombotic strategies and improve venous outcome assessment. Collaborative, multicenter research is necessary to answer these questions and thereby enhance the care of patients with venous disease.

Medium-term outcomes after inferior vena cava reconstruction for acute and chronic deep vein thrombosis and retroperitoneal fibrosis

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, we evaluated the technical and clinical outcomes after endovascular inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction in patients with nonmalignant obstruction.

METHODS

The preoperative, procedural, and follow-up medical records and imaging studies were retrospectively reviewed for 59 consecutive patients who had undergone endovascular IVC reconstruction for nonmalignant obstruction from February 2014 to January 2019. The patients were classified into three groups according to the quality of their infrainguinal inflow vessels. The outcomes measured were the primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates, reintervention rates, and symptomatic resolution.

RESULTS

The indications for treatment were post-thrombotic syndrome (n = 41), acute deep vein thrombosis (n = 12), and retroperitoneal fibrosis (n = 6). The median patient age was 37 years, 11 months, 71.2% were men, and 32.2% had a diagnosis of thrombophilia, with no significant difference in these demographics between the three inflow groups. The median follow-up duration was 2 years, 3 months (range, 6 months to 6 years, 5 months). The whole-cohort primary patency was 91.2%, 71.0%, and 24.1% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Secondary patency was 76.7% at 1 year and 66.4% at both 3 and 5 years. Inflow group A (no post-thrombotic disease in the femoral or deep femoral veins) demonstrated significantly higher primary patency compared with group B (stenotic disease in one or two infrainguinal inflow veins; P = .009) and significantly higher secondary patency than for both groups B (P = .008) and C (all three infrainguinal inflow veins had stenosed or femoral and/or deep femoral vein occlusion was present; P = .04). In post-thrombotic syndrome patients, the Villalta scores had decreased from a mean of 14.2 to 8.1 at 1 year and 6.8 at 2 years, and the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life score had improved from a mean of 19.8 to 54.1 and 57.3 at 1 and 2 years, respectively. In the patients with acute deep vein thrombosis, the Villalta score was 2.8 at 1 year and 0 at 2 years. In the patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis, the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life score had improved from a mean of 25.3 at baseline to 44 at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular IVC reconstruction for nonmalignant obstruction can achieve good patency and clinical improvement, although the outcomes were poorer for patients with post-thrombotic disease of the femoral and deep femoral veins.

Iliocaval reconstruction of chronically thrombosed cylindrical inferior vena cava filters with balloon expandable covered stent-grafts

The use of a Viabahn VBX endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) to exclude chronically thrombosed inferior vena cava (IVC) filters refractory to exclusion with self-expanding stents was evaluated. The mean duration of TrapEase IVC (Cordis, Milpitas, Calif) implantation was 7.6 years (range, 2-11 years). Symptoms included leg pain, edema, color changes, and back pain. The mean Villalta score and venous clinical severity score were 17 (range, 13-23) and 13 (range, 11-15), respectively. Indirect ultrasound evidence of stent patency was demonstrated at a mean of 8 months after intervention. The mean Villalta score and venous clinical severity score had decreased by 13 and 10, respectively, at a mean of 9.5 months after intervention. Iliocaval reconstruction with Viabahn VBX balloon expandable stent-graft exclusion of chronically thrombosed TrapEase IVC filters is safe, with favorable short-term results.

Inferior vena cava-syndrome

Inferior vena cava syndrome (IVCS) is caused by agenesis, compression, invasion, or thrombosis of the IVC, or may be associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Its incidence and prevalence are unknown. Benign IVCS is separated from malignant IVCS. Both cover a wide clinical spectrum reaching from asymptomatic to highly symptomatic cases correlated to the underlying cause, the acuity, the extent of the venous obstruction, and the recruitment and development of venous collateral circuits. Imaging is necessary to determine the underlying cause of IVCS and to guide clinical decisions. Interventional therapy has changed the therapeutic approach in symptomatic patients. This article provides an overview over IVCS and focuses on interventional therapeutic methods and results.

Iliocaval Skip Stent Reconstruction Technique for Chronic Bilateral Iliocaval Venous Occlusion

PURPOSE

To report safety and efficacy of a skip stent technique using nitinol stents in patients with chronic bilateral iliocaval venous occlusions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 48 consecutive patients (32 men; mean age, 40.7 years; age range, 18-68 years) with chronic bilateral iliocaval obstructions treated using a nonoverlapping stent technique was conducted at a single center. None of the patients had May-Thurner syndrome. Iliocaval confluence was treated by deploying a nitinol stent in inferior vena cava (IVC) and a nitinol stent in each common iliac vein close to the caval stent. Patency of stents was assessed by duplex US at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

Recanalization and stent reconstruction was technically successful in 47 (98%) patients. The sinus-XL venous stent was used to treat IVC (95 [100%]). Common iliac and external iliac veins were treated with sinus-Venous and VENOVO stents (80 [83%] and 16 [17%] limbs, respectively). External iliac and common femoral veins were treated with sinus-Venous and VENOVO stents (83 [92%] and 7 [18%] limbs, respectively). Early thrombosis (< 30 days) of the iliac vein with stent occurred in 2 limbs. Cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates at 30 months were 74%, 83%, and 97%.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of this study suggest that leaving a skipped lesion at the level of iliocaval confluence may not adversely affect stent patency. Patency rates were comparable with other reported techniques of stent reconstruction at the level of iliocaval confluence.

Recanalization of an Occluded Vena Cava Filter and Iliac Veins with Kissing Stents to Treat Postthrombotic Syndrome with a Venous Stasis Ulcer

Inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are effective in preventing pulmonary embolism and their usage has rapidly increased over the past decades. However, complications have also significantly increased, as IVCF occlusion causes serious chronic venous insufficiency. Herein, we report a case of infrarenal IVCF occlusion that was successfully treated with the introduction of kissing stents through the IVCF into both iliac veins. A 54-year-old male presented with non-healing ulcers on his left leg. He had undergone IVCF implantation and warfarin medication due to deep vein thrombosis 4 years earlier in another hospital. Computed tomography (CT) revealed the filter-bearing IVC occlusion. Endovascular IVCF removal was attempted but failed. Kissing stents were deployed across the IVCF and extended into both iliac veins. Cone beam CT showed well-deployed stents just behind the occluded IVCF. Venous flow was restored without complications, and the recurrent ulcer healed immediately.

Chronic Inferior Vena Cava Filter Thrombosis: Endovascular Treatment and One-Year Follow-Up with Intravascular Ultrasonography

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter thrombosis can be fatal when it is not detected and treated. Its management can be challenging, because little evidence supports specific treatments. We present the case of a 72-year-old man with a history of deep vein thrombosis in whom IVC filter thrombosis developed 7 years after filter placement. Recanalization with oral anticoagulation had failed. Using intravascular ultrasonography, we performed pharmacomechanical thrombolysis, deploying 2 stents simultaneously through the IVC filter and then 2 more into the iliac veins, with excellent results. One year later, the patient's veins and IVC filter were patent, his symptoms were greatly improved, and only nonobstructive neointimal hyperplasia was seen. This case highlights the usefulness of balloon venoplasty and double-barrel stent placement in restoring blood flow through an occluded IVC, and the value of intravascular ultrasonography during and after such procedures.

Inferior Vena Cava Calcified Thrombus Presenting With Abdominal Pain: A Case Report

De novo thrombosis of the inferior vena cava (IVC) can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Calcified thrombus of IVC is an extremely rare incidental finding and is associated with recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). We present a case of abdominal pain secondary to a calcified thrombus in the supra-hepatic region of the IVC.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Iliofemoral Stenting for Post-thrombotic Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Stent placements are considered as a treatment for post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with iliofemoral obstruction, but the application of these iliofemoral venous stents has also caused a lot of controversy. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarise the efficacy and safety of venous stents in PTS with obstruction in iliofemoral venous segments.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials databases and key references were searched up to 15 January 2018. The main relevant outcomes included technical success, peri-operative complications, symptom resolution, a change of symptom scores, and long-term patency of the stents.

RESULTS

Overall, 504 limbs of 489 patients from seven studies were included in this study. A GRADE assessment showed the quality of the evidence was "very low" for 11 relevant outcomes. The technical success rate was 95%. The pooled rate of complications including 30 day thrombotic event, per-operative venous injury, and back pain was 3.4%, 18.14%, and 52%, respectively. The rates of ulcer healing, pain and oedema relief were 75.66%, 52%, and 42%, respectively. The primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 83.36%, 90.59%, and 94.32%, respectively, at 12 months and 67.98%, 82.26%, and 86.10%, respectively, at 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovenous stenting has the potential to be effective and has a low risk of peri-operative complications. The quality of evidence to support this treatment is very low. Endovenous iliofemoral stenting should be considered a treatment option for PTS with iliofemoral obstruction.

Presentation and Management of Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT), although rare, has a potential for significant morbidity and mortality. IVCT is often a result of IVC filter thrombosis, but it can also occur de novo. Although anticoagulation remains the standard of care, endovascular techniques to restore IVC patency have become key adjunctive therapies in recent years. This study examines a single-center experience with diagnosis and management of IVCT.

METHODS

A retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved review of a single-center institutional database was screened to identify IVCT thrombosis using International Classification of Diseases code 453.2 over a 3-year period. Etiology of IVCT was separated into 2 groups: those with IVC thrombosis in the setting of prior IVC filter place and those in whom IVCT occurred de novo. Patient demographics, presenting characteristics, and management of IVCT were examined. Treatment options included expectant management with anticoagulation versus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), mechanical thrombectomy, stenting, or a combination. For those who underwent intervention, technical success, defined as restoration of IVC patency, was assessed.

RESULTS

Forty-one unique patients were identified with radiographically confirmed diagnosis of ICVT (mean age 61, range 25-91; 21 female, 51.2%). Eighteen (43.9%) patients presented with thrombosed IVC filter. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism included tobacco usage, current or prior smoking (n = 17, 41.5%), history of prior deep vein thrombosis (n = 25, 61.0%), malignancy (n = 17, 41.5%), use of hormonal supplements (n = 3, 7.3%), known thrombophilia (n = 4, 9.8%), and obesity (body mass index: mean 29, range 18.8-58.53). Eleven patients (26.8%) presented with pulmonary embolism (PE), and of those 63.6% had IVC filter thrombosis (n = 7). Risk of PE was not significantly different between those patients presenting with a thrombosed IVC filter compared to those with de novo IVCT (38.9% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.12) Management of IVCT included anticoagulation alone (n = 27, 65.9%), CDT (n = 5, 12.2%), mechanical thrombolysis (n = 10, 24.4%), and adjunctive IVC stent (n = 3, 7.3%). Among the 14 (34.1%) patients who had intervention for IVCT, patency was restored in 12 patients (85.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

IVCT is a rare event and is associated with known risk factors for venous thromboembolism. PE can occur in roughly 25% of patients presenting with IVCT. Presence of a filter does not appear to confer an advantage in preventing PE when IVCT occurs. Although majority of IVCT is managed with anticoagulation alone, endovascular interventions, including lysis and stenting, can safely restore patency in most properly selected patients.

Contemporary outcomes of elective iliocaval and infrainguinal venous intervention for post-thrombotic chronic venous occlusive disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis are at risk for development of post-thrombotic syndrome. Iliac vein stenting has been shown to significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with venous outflow obstruction, although many studies include a heterogeneous population with several different venous pathologic processes. Our objective was to evaluate the results of iliocaval and infrainguinal venous intervention for venous outflow obstruction due to post-thrombotic chronic venous occlusive disease.

METHODS

All patients treated at a single institution for symptomatic iliocaval venous occlusive lesions with and without infrainguinal extension between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions were excluded from analysis. All patients with symptomatic post-thrombotic occlusion of the iliac vein or inferior vena cava (IVC) and a Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) score of 3 or greater were included. Demographics of the patients, presence of IVC filters at presentation, presenting CEAP score, postintervention CEAP score, primary and secondary patency, wound healing and subjective clinical improvement outcomes, and procedural details were recorded in a database.

RESULTS

There were 105 patients with symptomatic iliocaval venous occlusive lesions identified, of which 31 patients (42 limbs) met inclusion criteria. Presenting symptoms included pain or swelling (100%); venous claudication (81%); and CEAP class 3 (76%), 4 or 5 (14%), or 6 (10%). All patients presented with either subacute (>30 days [35%]) or chronic (>90 days [65%]) iliocaval venous thrombosis. Procedural technical success with venous recanalization was achieved in 100% of cases and in 46% of IVC filter retrieval attempts. Overall clinical improvement was achieved in 84% of patients; complete clinical resolution was obtained in 42% and a decrease in CEAP score in 65%. At a mean follow-up of 14.7 months (range, 2-49 months), primary and secondary 1-year patency was 66% and 75% overall, and primary patency was equivalent between patients requiring isolated iliac venous stenting and those requiring infrainguinal stent extension (68% vs 65%, respectively; P = .74, not significant). Patients who presented with IVC filters had a higher rate of complete clinical resolution if the filter could be removed (100%) compared with those patients in whom the filter could not be removed (17%; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of chronic venous occlusive disease with iliocaval and infrainguinal venous stenting is associated with acceptable 1-year patency rates, healing of venous ulcers, and a significant reduction in symptoms and CEAP score. Patients who underwent successful removal of indwelling IVC filters showed improved clinical outcomes compared with those in whom the IVC filter could not be removed.

Treatment of Femoral Vein Obstruction Concomitant with Iliofemoral Stenting in Patients with Severe Post-thrombotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The aim was to assess the clinical and anatomical outcomes of iliofemoral stenting, with concomitant femoral stenting or balloon angioplasty alone, in patients with severe post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and compromised inflow.

METHODS

A database of patients with severe PTS who successfully underwent endovascular iliofemoral stenting was reviewed retrospectively. Patients with impaired inflow with chronic post-thrombotic obstructive lesions in the femoral vein (FV), but patent profunda vein, were selected and divided into two groups: the FV stenting (FV-S) group and the FV angioplasty (FV-A) group. Patients in the FV-S group were treated with concomitant iliofemoral and FV stenting, and patients in the FV-A group were treated with iliofemoral stenting and balloon angioplasty alone of the obstructed femoral vein. The clinical and stent outcomes were recorded and compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 45 patients in the FV-S group and 69 patients in the FV-A group. The groups were well matched for age, gender, and diseased limbs. The pre-procedural symptoms, CEAP classifications, VCSS scores, Villalta scores, and prevalence of active ulcers were also similar between the two groups. Immediate failure (<30 days post-procedure) in the femoral segment occurred more frequently in the FV-A group (70% in FV-A group vs. 24% in FV-S group, p < .001); however, all treated femoral vein segments had occluded at 12 months. There was no significant difference between the FV-S and FV-A groups in cumulative primary and secondary patency rates of the iliofemoral stent at 3 years (55% vs. 52%, p = .71, and 77% vs. 85%, p = .32, respectively). Complete pain relief, swelling relief, VCSS score, Villalta score, and freedom from ulcers at a median of 22 months (1-48 months) following the procedure were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent placement to treat post-thrombotic iliofemoral obstruction with concomitant obstructed femoral vein but patent profunda vein shows cumulative patency rates and clinical outcomes similar to previous reports. Adjunctive femoral stenting or angioplasty of the obstructed femoral vein does not appear to improve clinical or stent outcomes in patients with severe PTS.

Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-directed Thrombolysis for Acute and Subacute Inferior Vena Cava Thrombosis: A Retrospective Evaluation in a Single Institution

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

The objective was to assess the mid-term results of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) for symptomatic acute and subacute inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis; the risk factors of early thrombosis recurrence and iliocaval patency were also evaluated.

METHODS

From January 2010 to December 2015, 54 patients (33 men; mean age 47.1 years) with symptomatic acute and subacute IVC thrombosis were treated with PCDT. Primary technical success (clot lysis ≥ 50% after PCDT), stent-assisted technical success (residual stenosis < 30% after stenting), clinical success (freedom from thrombosis recurrence within 30 days), complications, frequency of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS; Villalta score ≥ 5), and iliocaval patency were recorded at follow-up evaluation. A multivariate regression model was used to determine predictors of early thrombosis reoccurrence and iliocaval patency.

RESULTS

The primary technical success and the stent-assisted technical success were 63% (n = 34/54) and 100% (n = 54/54) respectively. There were 11 patients (20%) with immediate recurrent thrombosis requiring repeat PCDT. Minor bleeding complications occurred in seven patients, and one patient with major bleeding needed a blood transfusion. The occurrence of PTS at a mean of 26 months (range 1-60 months) was 13% (7/54). The 3-year primary and secondary iliocaval patency was 63% and 81%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, active malignancy was predictive of immediate IVC thrombosis recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 5.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-19.8; p = .01), whereas the pre-existing filter played a protective role against iliocaval re-occlusion (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.8; p = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

PCDT is safe and effective in managing symptomatic acute and subacute IVC thrombosis. Active malignancy is predictor of thrombosis re-occurrence, whereas the presence of a filter is associated with a higher rate of iliocaval patency at mid-term follow-up.