1
|
Lokhande A, Painter DF, Vogt B, Shah A. Policy and Payment Decisions on Peritoneal Dialysis in the United States: A Review. Med Care Res Rev 2024:10775587241233614. [PMID: 38404115 DOI: 10.1177/10775587241233614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) accounts for a sizable proportion of Medicare spending. Peritoneal dialysis remains an underutilized treatment modality for ESKD despite its quality of life and cost-saving benefits. Medicare policy on reimbursements and patient eligibility for dialysis coverage has been amended numerous times since its inception in 1972. Over the last two decades, Medicare policy on ESKD reimbursements has evolved from a primarily fee-for-service model to a prospective payment system, and within the past few years, it has begun including more experimental payment structures. While prior work has explored the evolution of Medicare's ESKD policy as a whole, we specifically outline the impact of Medicare policy changes on peritoneal dialysis reimbursement rates, uptake by physicians and dialysis facilities, and accessibility to patients. This narrative review offers historical insights, an overview of modern ESKD policy, actionable strategies, and policy opportunities to increase the accessibility of this treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anagha Lokhande
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - David F Painter
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Braden Vogt
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Ankur Shah
- The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miura R, Okada K. Prescription of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic: interrupted time series study. Hypertens Res 2023; 46:2593-2602. [PMID: 37463982 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-023-01373-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
We surveyed changes in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARBs) prescription trends during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Japan. Data of 1,605,708 outpatients with hypertension were extracted from the Medical Data Vision database. Trends for prescription of ACEIs and ARBs were assessed by analyzing the proportion of these prescriptions in each month, between April 2018 and November 2020. The proportion of ARBs prescriptions changed significantly in trend between the peri-pandemic and pre-pandemic periods (-0.05%/month, P = 0.012). In contrast, the proportion of ACEIs prescriptions did not change significantly in trend in the peri-pandemic period (0.01%/month, P = 0.189). There was no suggestion that the prescribing of ACEIs and ARBs was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryosuke Miura
- Department of Pharmacy, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, 1-12-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 983-8512, Japan.
| | - Kouji Okada
- Department of Pharmacy, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, 1-12-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 983-8512, Japan
- Division of Clinical Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practice, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 1-12-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 983-8512, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quinn RR, Lam NN. Home Dialysis in North America: The Current State. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 18:1351-1358. [PMID: 37523194 PMCID: PMC10578635 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
There is widespread interest in expanding the uptake of home dialysis in North America. Although kidney transplantation should be the preferred option in eligible patients, home hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) offer cost-effective options for KRT. In this review, the motivation for promoting home dialysis is presented, and the literature supporting it is critically reviewed. Randomized comparisons of home HD and PD with in-center HD have been challenging to conduct and provide only limited information. Nonrandomized studies are heterogeneous in their design and have often yielded conflicting results. They are prone to bias, and this must be carefully considered when evaluating this literature. Home modalities seem to have equivalent clinical outcomes and quality of life when compared with in-center HD. However, the cost of providing home therapies, particularly PD, is lower than conventional, in-center HD. Measures of home dialysis utilization, the philosophy behind their measurement, and important factors to consider when interpreting them are discussed. The importance of understanding measures of home dialysis utilization in the context of rates of kidney failure, the proportion of individuals who opt for conservative care, and rates of kidney transplantation is highlighted, and a framework for proposing targets is presented, using PD as an example.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert R Quinn
- Cumming School of Medicine , University of Calgary , Calgary, Canada, and
- Department of Community Health Sciences , University of Calgary , Calgary, Canada
| | - Ngan N Lam
- Cumming School of Medicine , University of Calgary , Calgary, Canada, and
- Department of Community Health Sciences , University of Calgary , Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Emrani Z, Amiresmaili M, Daroudi R, Najafi MT, Akbari Sari A. Payment systems for dialysis and their effects: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:45. [PMID: 36650516 PMCID: PMC9847119 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08974-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND End stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major health concern and a large drain on healthcare resources. A wide range of payment methods are used for management of ESRD. The main aim of this study is to identify current payment methods for dialysis and their effects. METHOD In this scoping review Pubmed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from 2000 until 2021 using appropriate search strategies. Retrieved articles were screened according to predefined inclusion criteria. Data about the study characteristics and study results were extracted by a pre-structured data extraction form; and were analyzed by a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Fifty-nine articles were included, the majority of them were published after 2011 (66%); all of them were from high and upper middle-income countries, especially USA (64% of papers). Fee for services, global budget, capitation (bundled) payments, and pay for performance (P4P) were the main reimbursement methods for dialysis centers; and FFS, salary, and capitation were the main methods to reimburse the nephrologists. Countries have usually used a combination of methods depending on their situations; and their methods have been further developed over time specially from the retrospective payment systems (RPS) towards the prospective payment systems (PPS) and pay for performance methods. The main effects of the RPS were undertreatment of unpaid and inexpensive services, and over treatment of payable services. The main effects of the PPS were cost saving, shifting the service cost outside the bundle, change in quality of care, risk of provider, and modality choice. CONCLUSION This study provides useful insights about the current payment systems for dialysis and the effects of each payment system; that might be helpful for improving the quality and efficiency of healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Emrani
- grid.411705.60000 0001 0166 0922Department of Health Policy, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Amiresmaili
- grid.412105.30000 0001 2092 9755Health in Disasters and Emergencies Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Rajabali Daroudi
- grid.411705.60000 0001 0166 0922Department of Health Policy, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Taghi Najafi
- grid.411705.60000 0001 0166 0922Nephrology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran ,Center of Excellence in Nephrology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Akbari Sari
- grid.411705.60000 0001 0166 0922Department of Health Policy, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ji Y, Einav L, Mahoney N, Finkelstein A. Financial Incentives to Facilities and Clinicians Treating Patients With End-stage Kidney Disease and Use of Home Dialysis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA HEALTH FORUM 2022; 3:e223503. [PMID: 36206005 PMCID: PMC9547325 DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.3503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Home dialysis rates for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treatment are substantially lower in the US than in other high-income countries, yet there is limited knowledge on how to increase these rates. Objective To report results from the first year of a nationwide randomized clinical trial that provides financial incentives to ESKD facilities and managing clinicians to increase home dialysis rates. Design, Setting, and Participants Results were analyzed from the first year of the End-Stage Renal Disease Treatment Choice (ETC) model, a multiyear, mandatory-participation randomized clinical trial designed and implemented by the US Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation. Data were reported on Medicare patients with ESKD 66 years or older who initiated treatment with dialysis in 2021, with data collection through December 31, 2021; the study included all eligible ESKD facilities and managing clinicians. Eligible hospital referral regions (HRRs) were randomly assigned to the ETC (91 HRRs) or a control group (211 HRRs). Interventions The ESKD facilities and managing clinicians received financial incentives for home dialysis use. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with ESKD who received any home dialysis during the first 90 days of treatment. Secondary outcomes included other measures of home dialysis and patient volume and characteristics. Results Among the 302 HRRs eligible for randomization, 18 621 eligible patients initiated dialysis treatment during the study period (mean [SD] age, 74.8 [1.05] years; 7856 women [42.1%]; 10 765 men [57.9%]; 859 Asian [5.2%], 3280 [17.7%] Black, 730 [4.3%] Hispanic, 239 North American Native, and 12 394 managing clinicians. The mean (SD) share of patients with any home dialysis during the first 90 days was 20.6% (7.8%) in the control group and was 0.12 percentage points higher (95% CI, -1.42 to 1.65 percentage points; P = .88) in the ETC group, a statistically nonsignificant difference. None of the secondary outcomes differed significantly between groups. Conclusions and Relevance The trial results found that in the first year of the US Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation-designed ETC model, HRRs assigned to the model did not have statistically significantly different rates in home dialysis compared with control HRRs. This raises questions about the efficacy of the financial incentives provided, although further evaluation is needed, as the size of these incentives will increase in subsequent years. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05005572.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunan Ji
- McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Liran Einav
- Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California,National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Neale Mahoney
- Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, California,National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts,J-PAL North America, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Amy Finkelstein
- National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts,J-PAL North America, Cambridge, Massachusetts,Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shukla AM, Bozorgmehri S, Ruchi R, Mohandas R, Hale-Gallardo JL, Ozrazgat-Baslanti T, Orozco T, Segal MS, Jia H. Utilization of CMS pre-ESRD Kidney Disease Education services and its associations with the home dialysis therapies. Perit Dial Int 2021; 41:453-462. [PMID: 33258420 PMCID: PMC10038064 DOI: 10.1177/0896860820975586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney Disease Education (KDE) has been shown to improve informed dialysis selection and home dialysis use, two long-held but underachieved goals of US nephrology community. In 2010, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services launched a policy of KDE reimbursements for all Medicare beneficiaries with advanced chronic kidney disease. However, the incorporation of KDE service in real-world practice and its association with the home dialysis utilization has not been examined. METHODS Using the 2016 US Renal Data System linked to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and pre-ESRD Medicare claim data, we identified all adult incident ESRD patients with active Medicare benefits at their first-ever dialysis during the study period (1 January 2010 to 31 December 2014). From these, we identified those who had at least one KDE service code before their dialysis initiation (KDE cohort) and compared them to a parsimoniously matched non-KDE control cohort in 1:4 proportions for age, gender, ESRD network, and the year of dialysis initiation. The primary outcome was home dialysis use at dialysis initiation, and secondary outcomes were home dialysis use at day 90 and anytime through the course of ESRD. RESULTS Of the 369,968 qualifying incident ESRD Medicare beneficiaries with their first-ever dialysis during the study period, 3469 (0.9%) received KDE services before dialysis initiation. African American race, Hispanic ethnicity, and the presence of congestive heart failure and hypoalbuminemia were associated with significantly lower odds of receiving KDE services. Multivariate analyses showed that KDE recipients had twice the odds of initiating dialysis with home modalities (15.0% vs. 6.9%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR):95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0:1.7-2.4) and had significantly higher odds using home dialysis throughout the course of ESRD (home dialysis use at day 90 (17.6% vs. 9.9%, aOR:CI 1.7:1.4-1.9) and cumulatively (24.7% vs. 15.1%, aOR:CI 1.7:1.5-1.9)). CONCLUSIONS Utilization of pre-ESRD KDE services is associated with significantly greater home dialysis utilization in the incident ESRD Medicare beneficiaries. The very low rates of utilization of these services suggest the need for focused systemic evaluations to identify and address the barriers and facilitators of this important patient-centered endeavor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashutosh M Shukla
- Division of Nephrology, 158428North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Shahab Bozorgmehri
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Rupam Ruchi
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Rajesh Mohandas
- Division of Nephrology, 158428North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jennifer L Hale-Gallardo
- Division of Nephrology, 158428North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Tatiana Orozco
- Division of Nephrology, 158428North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Mark S Segal
- Division of Nephrology, 158428North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension, and Transplantation, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Huanguang Jia
- Division of Nephrology, 158428North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sloan CE, Coffman CJ, Sanders LL, Maciejewski ML, Lee SYD, Hirth RA, Wang V. Trends in Peritoneal Dialysis Use in the United States after Medicare Payment Reform. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14:1763-1772. [PMID: 31753816 PMCID: PMC6895485 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.05910519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Peritoneal dialysis (PD) for ESKD is associated with similar mortality, higher quality of life, and lower costs compared with hemodialysis (HD), but has historically been underused. We assessed the effect of the 2011 Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for dialysis on PD initiation, modality switches, and stable PD use. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Using US Renal Data System and Medicare data, we identified all United States patients with ESKD initiating dialysis before (2006-2010) and after (2011-2013) PPS implementation, and observed their modality for up to 2 years after dialysis initiation. Using logistic regression models, we examined the associations between PPS and early PD experience (any PD 1-90 days after initiation), late PD use (any PD 91-730 days after initiation), and modality switches (PD-to-HD or HD-to-PD 91-730 days after initiation). We adjusted for patient, dialysis facility, and regional characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 619,126 patients with incident ESKD received dialysis at Medicare-certified facilities, 2006-2013. Observed early PD experience increased from 9.4% before PPS to 12.6% after PPS. Observed late PD use increased from 12.1% to 16.1%. In adjusted analyses, PPS was associated with increased early PD experience (odds ratio [OR], 1.51; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.47 to 1.55; P<0.001) and late PD use (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.45 to 1.50; P<0.001). In subgroup analyses, late PD use increased in part due to an increase in HD-to-PD switches among those without early PD experience (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.52 to 1.66; P<0.001) and a decrease in PD-to-HD switches among those with early PD experience (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.98; P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS More patients started, stayed on, and switched to PD after dialysis payment reform. This occurred without a substantial increase in transfers to HD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline E Sloan
- Departments of Medicine.,Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Cynthia J Coffman
- Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; and.,Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, and
| | | | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Departments of Medicine.,Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; and.,Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shoou-Yih D Lee
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Richard A Hirth
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Virginia Wang
- Departments of Medicine, .,Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; and.,Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Young EW, Kapke A, Ding Z, Baker R, Pearson J, Cogan C, Mukhopadhyay P, Turenne MN. Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Outcomes under the Medicare Expanded Dialysis Prospective Payment System. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 14:1466-1474. [PMID: 31515234 PMCID: PMC6777599 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.01610219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Peritoneal dialysis (PD) use increased in the United States with the introduction of a new Medicare prospective payment system in January 2011 that likely reduced financial disincentives for facility use of this home therapy. The expansion of PD to a broader population and facilities having less PD experience may have implications for patient outcomes. We assessed the impact of PD expansion on PD discontinuation and patient mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS A prospective cohort study was conducted of patients treated with PD at 90 days of ESKD. Patients were grouped by study start date relative to the Medicare payment reform: prereform (July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009; n=10,585), interim (January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010; n=7832), and reform period (January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012; n=18,742). Patient characteristics and facility PD experience were compared at baseline (day 91 of ESKD). Patients were followed for 3 years for the major outcomes of PD discontinuation and mortality using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Patient characteristics, including age, sex, race, ethnicity, rurality, cause of ESKD, and comorbidity, were similar or showed small changes across the three study periods. There was an increasing tendency for patients on PD to be treated in facilities with less PD experience (from 34% during the prereform period being treated in facilities averaging <14 patients on PD per year to 44% in the reform period). Patients treated in facilities with less PD experience had a higher rate of PD discontinuation than patients treated in facilities with the most experience (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.10 to 1.23 for the first versus fifth quintile of PD experience). Nevertheless, the risk of PD discontinuation fell during the late interim period (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.95) and most of the reform period (from HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.91 to HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.01). Mortality risk was stable across the three study periods. CONCLUSIONS In the context of expanding PD use and declining facility PD experience, the risk of PD discontinuation fell, and there was no adverse effect on mortality. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2019_09_12_CJN01610219.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric W Young
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and .,University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Alissa Kapke
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Zhechen Ding
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | | | - Jeffrey Pearson
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Chad Cogan
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | | | - Marc N Turenne
- Arbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang V, Coffman CJ, Sanders LL, Lee SYD, Hirth RA, Maciejewski ML. Medicare's New Prospective Payment System on Facility Provision of Peritoneal Dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13:1833-1841. [PMID: 30455323 PMCID: PMC6302340 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.05680518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Peritoneal dialysis is a self-administered, home-based treatment for ESKD associated with equivalent mortality, higher quality of life, and lower costs compared with hemodialysis. In 2011, Medicare implemented a comprehensive prospective payment system that makes a single payment for all dialysis, medication, and ancillary services. We examined whether the prospective payment system increased dialysis facility provision of peritoneal dialysis services and whether changes in peritoneal dialysis provision were more common among dialysis facilities that are chain affiliated, located in nonurban areas, and in regions with high dialysis market competition. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We conducted a longitudinal retrospective cohort study of n=6433 United States nonfederal dialysis facilities before (2006-2010) and after (2011-2013) the prospective payment system using data from the US Renal Data System, Medicare, and Area Health Resource Files. The outcomes of interest were a dichotomous indicator of peritoneal dialysis service availability and a discrete count variable of dialysis facility peritoneal dialysis program size defined as the annual number of patients on peritoneal dialysis in a facility. We used general estimating equation models to examine changes in peritoneal dialysis service offerings and peritoneal dialysis program size by a pre- versus post-prospective payment system effect and whether changes differed by chain affiliation, urban location, facility size, or market competition, adjusting for 1-year lagged facility-, patient with ESKD-, and region-level demographic characteristics. RESULTS We found a modest increase in observed facility provision of peritoneal dialysis and peritoneal dialysis program size after the prospective payment system (36% and 5.7 patients in 2006 to 42% and 6.9 patients in 2013, respectively). There was a positive association of the prospective payment system with peritoneal dialysis provision (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.18) and PD program size (incidence rate ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 1.33). Post-prospective payment system change in peritoneal dialysis provision was greater among nonurban (P<0.001), chain-affiliated (P=0.002), and larger-sized facilities (P<0.001), and there were higher rates of peritoneal dialysis program size growth in nonurban facilities (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Medicare's 2011 prospective payment system was associated with more facilities' availability of peritoneal dialysis and modest growth in facility peritoneal dialysis program size. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2018_11_19_CJASNPodcast_18_12_.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Wang
- Departments of Population Health Sciences and
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Cynthia J. Coffman
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics and
- Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Linda L. Sanders
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shoou-Yih D. Lee
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Richard A. Hirth
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew L. Maciejewski
- Departments of Population Health Sciences and
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Health Services Research and Development Center of Innovation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina; and
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dialysis Provision and Implications of Health Economics on Peritoneal Dialysis Utilization: A Review from a Malaysian Perspective. Int J Nephrol 2017; 2017:5819629. [PMID: 29225970 PMCID: PMC5684550 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5819629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 10/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is managed by either lifesaving hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) or a kidney transplant. In Malaysia, the prevalence of dialysis-treated ESRD patients has shown an exponential growth from 504 per million population (pmp) in 2005 to 1155 pmp in 2014. There were 1046 pmp patients on HD and 109 pmp patients on PD in 2014. Kidney transplants are limited due to lack of donors. Malaysia adopts public-private financing model for dialysis. Majority of HD patients were treated in the private sector but almost all PD patients were treated in government facilities. Inequality in access to dialysis is visible within geographical regions where majority of HD centres are scattered around developed areas. The expenditure on dialysis has been escalating in recent years but economic evaluations of dialysis modalities are scarce. Evidence shows that health policies and reimbursement strategies influence dialysis provision. Increased uptake of PD can produce significant economic benefits and improve patients' access to dialysis. As a result, some countries implemented a PD-First or Favored Policy to expand PD use. Thus, a current comparative costs analysis of dialysis is strongly recommended to assist decision-makers to establish a more equitable and economically sustainable dialysis provision in the future.
Collapse
|