1
|
Endomba FT, Aho Glélé LS, Benkhadra M, Guillet C. Etomidate versus propofol for electroconvulsive therapy: An intraindividual comparative study during the COVID-19 pandemic. L'ENCEPHALE 2023:S0013-7006(23)00181-1. [PMID: 38040511 DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic markedly influenced mental health care practices, notably regarding electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). This was due to the redistribution of anesthetic agents used during ECT such as propofol, for intensive care units. Because in our center propofol was switched to etomidate to avoid ECT activity discontinuation, we undertook this study in order to compare Propofol and Etomidate regarding electroencephalographic seizure duration and stimulus intensity. METHODS We performed a retrospective and comparative study, each patient being its own control. We included patients with at least two courses of ECT on propofol and two others with etomidate over the period from September 2019 to April 2021, regardless of the psychiatric diagnosis. Our data collection process notably targeted stimulus intensity, seizure duration recorded using electroencephalography, and medication used for anesthetic induction. RESULTS Overall, we included 18 patients with a male: female ratio of 1:2.6 and a mean (and standard deviation) age of 62.7±13.4 years. We found that the mean intensity of stimulation was significantly lower with etomidate when compared to propofol (425.3±250.0 vs. 658.9±280.2 mC, P=0.001). The mean duration of electroencephalographic seizure was significantly higher with etomidate in comparison to propofol (53.5±16.6 vs. 35.0±12.2seconds, P<0.001). CONCLUSION By using each patient as its own control, our study found that etomidate, while compared to propofol, was related to a lower level of stimulatory intensity and a longer electroencephalographic seizure duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ludwig Serge Aho Glélé
- Service d'épidémiologie et d'hygiène hospitalière, CHU hôpital d'enfants, 14, rue Paul 10 Gaffarel, 21079 Dijon, France
| | - Mehdi Benkhadra
- Service de Sismothérapie, Centre Hospitalier La Chartreuse, 21000 Dijon, France
| | - Clément Guillet
- La Chartreuse Psychiatric Hospital, Depression Unit, 21000 Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luccarelli J, Henry ME, Smith F, Beach SR, McCoy TH. Changes in Inpatient Electroconvulsive Therapy Utilization Between 2019 and 2020: A National Inpatient Sample Analysis. J ECT 2023; 39:173-178. [PMID: 37027490 PMCID: PMC10514222 DOI: 10.1097/yct.0000000000000917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an essential procedure for a range of psychiatric conditions. Multiple single-center studies have documented reduction in ECT administration in 2020 because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, but there have been little nationally representative data from the United States. The aim of this study was to examine the demographics of patients receiving ECT in 2019 and 2020 and to characterize temporal and regional variations in ECT utilization. METHODS The 2019 and 2020 National Inpatient Sample, an administrative database of inpatient hospitalizations in the United States, was queried for hospitalizations involving the delivery of ECT based on procedural codes. Overall number of ECT procedures was calculated based on the overall number of ECT procedural claims. RESULTS In the 2019 NIS, 14,230 inpatient hospitalizations (95% confidence interval, 12,936-15,524) involved the use of ECT, with a cumulative 52,450 inpatient ECT procedures administered. In 2020, the number of inpatient hospitalizations with ECT decreased to 12,055 (95% confidence interval, 10,878-13,232), with a 10.0% reduction in overall procedures to 47,180. Whereas January and February ECT hospitalizations were comparable in both years, ECT hospitalizations decreased by more than 25% in March through May 2020 relative to 2019 volume. There was regional variability in the change in ECT utilization between 2019 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS Electroconvulsive therapy use among general hospital inpatients declined between 2019 and 2020, with regional variability in the magnitude of change. Further study is warranted into the root causes and optimal responses to these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Luccarelli
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael E. Henry
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Felicia Smith
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scott R. Beach
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas H. McCoy
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Laurin A, Bulteau S, Caillet P, Artari P, Sauvaget A, Gollier-Briant F, Huon JF, Bonnot O. Psychotropic drugs consumption during 2020 COVID-19 pandemic and lockdowns: Evidence of a surprising resilience of the drugs delivery system in France. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2023; 73:48-61. [PMID: 37119562 PMCID: PMC10086109 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic imposed two lockdowns of eight and six weeks in France. While access to care was reduced during lockdown periods, these stressful situations with the pandemic and lockdown periods may have a negative impact on mental health, especially in vulnerable subgroups. Monitoring of psychotropic drugs consumption in France is a comprehensive and reliable tool for indirectly analyzing the mental health of French people. This historical cohort study (n = 767 147) investigated the short-term and long-term evolution of the weekly trend of psychotropic drugs users in 2020 by performing a Seasonal Trend decomposition time series analysis. Rate of progression of consumers per week increased from 186 in the last week of 2019 to 261 per week in the last week of 2020 (+40.3%). Our results did not show a significant break in psychotropic drugs consumption trends during the year 2020 and its two lockdowns. The increase in trend regarding psychotropic drugs consumptions was greatest in young people (<15 years) and patients not being socially deprived. Despite the increase in consumers with restrictive health measures, the French drugs delivery system has been able to adapt with the support of government and pharmacy network. This point should be kept in mind as the necessary reforms to the health care system are undertaken. The COVID-19 pandemic has a negative impact on mental health and two lockdowns occurred in France with reduced access to care. In this context, monitoring of psychotropic drugs consumption is a comprehensive and reliable tool for analyzing the mental health of French people. We hypothesized that the psychotropic drugs consumption has increased during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, testifying to French people mental health deterioration, with psychotropic drugs consumption breaks during lockdowns, especially during the first "grand national lockdown", due to the closure or difficulties for accessing to health care structures. By carrying out a historical cohort study among Pays de la Loire residents (n = 767 147), we investigated evolution of the weekly trend of psychotropic drugs users in 2020 compared to 2019 by performing a Seasonal Trend decomposition time series analysis. Between 2019 to 2020, we found a + 40.3% rate of progression of consumers per week. During the year 2020, changes in trend regarding psychotropic drugs consumptions was observed in various sub-groups, e.g. greater in the youngest (< 15 years), which may indicate a vulnerable group strongly impacted by COVID-19 negative consequences, and patients not being socially deprived, which may indicate a group with probably an easier access to care. Lockdown periods were not associated with a significant change in psychotropic drug use, suggesting a form of resilience in the French health care system to maintain its capacity to deliver psychotropic treatments. We mainly discussed that despite the increase in consumers and the policies of restricting access to care during lockdown periods, the French drugs delivery system has been able to adapt thanks to supportive policy actions (extension of the prescriptions validity without the need for a renewal by a physician during periods of lockdowns), an efficient pharmacy network with a collaborative practice of health actors that need to be developed and/or conserved to face potential future health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Laurin
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Movement - Interactions - Performance, MIP, UR 4334, F-44000 Nantes, France.
| | - Samuel Bulteau
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, MethodS in Patients-centered outcomes and HEalth Research, SPHERE, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Pascal Caillet
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Service de Santé Publique, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Pascal Artari
- French National Health Insurance, Medical Department, DRSM Nantes, France
| | - Anne Sauvaget
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Movement - Interactions - Performance, MIP, UR 4334, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | | | | | - Olivier Bonnot
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Pharmacy, F-44000 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Demchenko I, Tassone VK, Dunnett S, Balachandar A, Li S, Anderson M, Daskalakis ZJ, Foley K, Karkouti K, Kennedy SH, Ladha KS, Robertson J, Vaisman A, Koczerginski D, Parikh SV, Blumberger DM, Flint AJ, Bhat V. Impact of COVID-19 on electroconvulsive therapy practice across Canadian provinces during the first wave of the pandemic. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:327. [PMID: 37165333 PMCID: PMC10170445 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04832-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a procedural treatment that is potentially life-saving for some patients with severe psychiatric illness. At the start of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, ECT practice was remarkably disrupted, putting vulnerable individuals at increased risk of symptom exacerbation and death by suicide. This study aimed to capture the self-reported experiences of psychiatrists based at healthcare facilities across Canadian provinces who were delivering ECT treatments during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., from mid-March 2020 to mid-May 2020). METHODS A multidisciplinary team of experts developed a survey focusing on five domains: ECT unit operations, decision-making, hospital resources, ECT procedure, and mitigating patient impact. Responses were collected from psychiatrists providing ECT at 67 ECT centres in Canada, grouped by four geographical regions (Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic Canada, and Western Canada). RESULTS Clinical operations of ECT programs were disrupted across all four regions - however, centres in Atlantic Canada were able to best preserve outpatient and maintenance care, while centres in Western Canada were able to best preserve inpatient and acute care. Similarly, Atlantic and Western Canada demonstrated the best decision-making practices of involving the ECT team and clinical ethicists in the development of pandemic-related guidelines. Across all four regions, ECT practice was affected by the redeployment of professionals, the shortage of personal protective equipment, and the need to enforce social distancing. Attempts to introduce modifications to the ECT delivery room and minimize bag-valve-mask ventilation were consistently reported. All four regions developed a new patient prioritization framework, and Western Canada, notably, aimed to provide ECT to only the most severe cases. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that ECT provision was disproportionately affected across different parts of Canada. Possible factors that could explain these interregional differences include population, distribution of urban vs. rural areas, pre-pandemic barriers in access to ECT, number of cases, ability to control the spread of infection, and the general reduction in physicians' activities across different areas of health care. Studying these factors in the future will inform how medical centres should respond to public health emergencies and pandemic-related circumstances in the context of procedural treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya Demchenko
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Mental Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vanessa K Tassone
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Mental Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Dunnett
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Mental Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arpana Balachandar
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Mental Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sophie Li
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Mental Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melanie Anderson
- Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zafiris J Daskalakis
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Karen Foley
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Keyvan Karkouti
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sidney H Kennedy
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Mental Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karim S Ladha
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jamie Robertson
- Centre for Clinical Ethics, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alon Vaisman
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Koczerginski
- Department of Psychiatry, North York General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sagar V Parikh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alastair J Flint
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Venkat Bhat
- Interventional Psychiatry Program, Mental Health and Addictions Service, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multiple countries have reported increased COVID-19 mortality in patients with schizophrenia. The purpose of this review was to synthetize the consequences of the pandemic on patients with schizophrenia including vaccination data. RECENT FINDINGS We have synthetized data on the increased risk of infection and increased mortality, the impact of the pandemic and lockdowns on psychiatric care, vaccination policies, unwillingness to vaccine in patients and the rates of vaccination. SUMMARY Schizophrenia has been confirmed at increased risk of both COVID-19 infection and developing a severe/lethal form of the infection. Patients with schizophrenia should, therefore, be prioritized for vaccination whenever possible and should be prioritized for psychiatric and somatic care access. Psychotic symptomatology may be a barrier to vaccination in some patients, and heterogenous vaccination rates were identified in national databases. The COVID-19 pandemic has been also a unique opportunity to develop telehealth. A mixed face-to-face and distance model should be encouraged, whenever possible, to improve the experience of patients, relatives and healthcare professionals. No major change of long-acting antipsychotics has been reported in most countries, and there was no consistent evidence for clozapine prescription to increase the risk of COVID-19 infection or severe outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Fond
- Aix-Marseille University, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Marseille
- FondaMental Academic Advanced Center of Expertise for Depressive disorders and Schizophrenia (FACE-DR, FACE-SZ), Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Boyer
- Aix-Marseille University, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Marseille
- FondaMental Academic Advanced Center of Expertise for Depressive disorders and Schizophrenia (FACE-DR, FACE-SZ), Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Coffey MJ, Kerns S, Sanghani S, Wachtel L. The Impact of COVID-19 on Brain Stimulation Therapy. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2022; 45:123-131. [PMID: 35219433 PMCID: PMC8801771 DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2021.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Among the far-reaching effects of the COVID-19 pandemic has been restricted access to safe and effective forms of psychiatric treatment. Focusing on electroconvulsive therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation, we review the pandemic's impact on brain stimulation therapy by asking 3 fundamental questions-Where have we been? How are we doing? And where are we going?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suzanne Kerns
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sohag Sanghani
- Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Lee Wachtel
- Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Surve RM, Sinha P, Baliga SP, M R, Karan N, Jl A, Arumugham S, Thirthalli J. Electroconvulsive therapy services during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Psychiatr 2021; 59:102653. [PMID: 33845300 PMCID: PMC8022516 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has hit the electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) services hard worldwide as it is considered an elective procedure and hence has been given less importance. Other reasons include the risk of transmission of infections, lack of resources, and the scarcity of anesthesiologists due to their diversion to intensive care units to manage COVID-19 patients. However, ECT is an urgent and life-saving measure for patients diagnosed with depression and other severe mental illnesses who have suicidality, catatonia, or require a rapid therapeutic response. COVID-19 pandemic is a significant source of stress for individuals due to its impact on health, employment, and social support resulting in new-onset psychiatric illnesses and the worsening of a pre-existing disorder. Hence, a continuation of the ECT services during the COVID-19 pandemic is of paramount importance. In this narrative review, the authors from India have compiled the literature on the ECT practice during the COVID-19 pandemic related to the screening and testing protocol, necessity of personal protective equipment, modification in ECT Suite, electrical stmulus settings, and anesthesia technique modification. The authors have also shared their experiences with the ECT services provided at their institute during this pandemic. This description will help other institutes to manage the ECT services uninterruptedly and make ECT a safe procedure during the current pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohini M Surve
- Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Preeti Sinha
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India.
| | - Sachin P Baliga
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Radhakrishnan M
- Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Nupur Karan
- Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Anju Jl
- Department of Neuroanaesthesia and Neurocritical Care, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Shyamsundar Arumugham
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| | - Jagadisha Thirthalli
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bengaluru, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Loureiro Pereira-Soares E, Nascimento AL, da Silva JA, Nardi AE. Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Expert Rev Neurother 2020; 21:1-3. [PMID: 33043717 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1835471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Antonio Egidio Nardi
- Institute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sauvaget A, Dumont R, Bukowski N, Bonnot O, Auffret R, Poulet E, Szekely D, Quiles C, Yrondi A, Plaze M, de Carvalho W, Amad A, Bulteau S. [Recommendations for a gradual and controlled resumption of electroconvulsive therapy in France during the period of lifting of the containment and of the COVID-19 pandemic linked to SARS-CoV-2]. L'ENCEPHALE 2020; 46:S119-S122. [PMID: 32507557 PMCID: PMC7271849 DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
La pandémie du COVID-19 a des conséquences majeures sur l’organisation des soins. En France et dans le monde, les centres pratiquant l’électroconvulsivothérapie (ECT) ont vu leur activité diminuer, voire s’arrêter, pour de diverses raisons. Dans ce contexte, le maintien ou la reprise de cette activité thérapeutique essentielle pour de nombreux patients souffrant de troubles psychiatriques nécessite des adaptations matérielles, humaines et logistiques qu’il convient d’encadrer. L’objectif de ce travail collectif et national est de proposer des recommandations simples et applicables immédiatement par tout établissement de santé, public ou privé, pratiquant les ECT. Elles sont issues d’un retour d’expériences pluriprofessionnelles et interétablissements. Déclinées en trois étapes, ces recommandations sont accompagnées d’une fiche pratique qui décrit, de façon précise, les conditions nécessaires et préalables à toute reprise d’activité ECT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sauvaget
- French Society for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology, STEP Section (Stimulation transcrânienne en psychiatrie), Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France; Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Movement, Interactions, Performance (MIP), EA 4334, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
| | - R Dumont
- CHU de Nantes, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôtel-Dieu-PTMC, Nantes, France
| | - N Bukowski
- CHU Nantes, Department of Addictology and Psychiatry, Nantes, France
| | - O Bonnot
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, CHU and University of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - R Auffret
- CHU Nantes, Department of Addictology and Psychiatry, Nantes, France
| | - E Poulet
- French Society for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology, STEP Section (Stimulation transcrânienne en psychiatrie), Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France; Centre hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France; Université de Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, 69000 Lyon, France; University Lyon 1, 69000 Villeurbanne, France; Department of Emergency Psychiatry, hospices civils de Lyon, University Hospital Edouard-Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - D Szekely
- French Society for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology, STEP Section (Stimulation transcrânienne en psychiatrie), Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France; Department of psychiatry, centre hospitalier Princesse-Grace, 98000 Monaco, France
| | - C Quiles
- Centre hospitalier Charles-Perrens, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - A Yrondi
- French Society for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology, STEP Section (Stimulation transcrânienne en psychiatrie), Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France; Service de psychiatrie et de psychologie médicale, centre expert dépression résistante fondamental, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Inserm, UPS, ToNIC Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, hôpital Purpan, université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - M Plaze
- French Society for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology, STEP Section (Stimulation transcrânienne en psychiatrie), Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France; Université de Paris, 75005 Paris, France; Service hospitalo-universitaire, GHU de Paris psychiatrie & neurosciences, 75014 Paris, France
| | - W de Carvalho
- Pôle ECT - groupe SINOUÉ, clinique BELLEVUE, 92190 Meudon, France
| | - A Amad
- Inserm, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, CHU de Lille, université de Lille, 59000 Lille, France
| | - S Bulteau
- French Society for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology, STEP Section (Stimulation transcrânienne en psychiatrie), Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France; CHU Nantes, Department of Addictology and Psychiatry, Nantes, France; Inserm-U1246 SPHERE University of Nantes and University of Tours, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|