[Informations on psychotropics and their adaptations for patients suffering from mental disorders in France during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic]

Causes of mortality among adults with Down syndrome before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain

BACKGROUND

The life expectancy of people with Down syndrome (DS) is limited by Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related deaths, mainly due to respiratory infections. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic could have changed known, past trends in mortality in this population. We analysed the differences in causes of mortality between individuals with DS deceased before and after the onset of the pandemic.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional study of adults with DS recruited at a tertiary, university outpatient clinic in Madrid, Spain. Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected from their medical records, including information on their deaths, if any.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy-two adults were included in the study, and 67 (11.7%) died. The main cause of death was respiratory infections, which occurred in 36 participants [9 (45.0%) before, and 27 (58.7%) after the appearance of COVID-19]. No significant differences were found in the determinants of pre-pandemic and post-pandemic death after adjusting for age and AD, except for an association between the use of psychotropic medication and death in the post-pandemic period (odds ratio: 2.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-4.82). Vaccination against COVID-19 showed a marked protective effect against mortality (odds ratio: 0.0002; 95% confidence interval: 6.7e10-6 to 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The appearance of COVID-19 has not impacted the overall trend of increase in mean age of death of adults with DS in our milieu, probably thanks to the very important protective effect of vaccination, which supports prioritising people with DS in future immunisation campaigns. The association between psychotropic medication use and mortality requires further exploration.

Psychotropics and COVID-19: An analysis of safety and prophylaxis

The use of psychotropics during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised two questions, in order of importance: first, what changes should be made to pharmacological treatments prescribed to mental health patients? Secondly, are there any positive side effects of these substances against SARS-CoV-2? Our aim was to analyze usage safety of psychotropics during COVID-19; therefore, herein, we have studied: (i) the risk of symptomatic complications of COVID-19 associated with the use of these drugs, notably central nervous system activity depression, QTc interval enlargement and infectious and thromboembolic complications; (ii) the risk of mistaking the iatrogenic impact of psychotropics with COVID-19 symptoms, causing diagnostic error. Moreover, we provided a summary of the different information available today for these risks, categorized by mental health disorder, for the following: schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, ADHD, sleep disorders and suicidal risk. The matter of psychoactive substance use during the pandemic is also analyzed in this paper, and guideline websites and publications for psychotropic treatments in the context of COVID-19 are referenced during the text, so that changes on those guidelines and eventual interaction between psychotropics and COVID-19 treatment medication can be reported and studied. Finally, we also provide a literature review of the latest known antiviral properties of psychotropics against SARS-CoV-2 as complementary information.

Adverse drug reactions associated with concurrent acute psychiatric treatment and Covid-19 drug therapy

OBJECTIVE

Psychiatric patients are at increased risk of contamination, morbidity, and mortality associated with COVID-19, together with potentially more pronounced adverse effects. We present and discuss the adverse effects observed in an acute psychiatric clinic that has admitted COVID-19 patients during the first three months of the pandemic in Turkey.

METHODS

The COVID-19 treatment schemes were formed in accordance with the national and regional guidelines at the time of admittance, which were mainly based on the use of hydroxychloroquine and other drugs. The sample consisted exclusively of inpatients, and all patients were enrolled in the study regardless of their specific diagnosis or treatment schemes.

RESULTS

4 out of 23 patients (17.4%) had experienced adverse effects, two of which had mild hepatic enzyme elevation and one had mild sinus bradycardia. Of note is that we haven't encountered any serious complications or life-threatening events during inpatient treatment. The most emphasised adverse effect in the literature, namely QTc prolongation and ECG changes, were not observed in our sample. The adverse effects were not found to be significantly associated with patient-related factors nor dose of antipsychotic medication.

CONCLUSIONS

From our point of view, non-cardiac adverse effects should not be overlooked while treating comorbid psychiatric and COVID-19 patients.KEY POINTSAcute inpatient psychiatric treatment of patients who have comorbid COVID-19 is a complex situation requiring multidisciplinary action.Adverse drug reactions, which may or not result from the interaction of psychiatric and COVID-19 treatment, should be of concern for this patient group.While there is controversy over the benefits of some of the off-label COVID-19 medications, there should also be discussion over safety and concomitant medication use.In order to be adequately prepared for future escalations of COVID-19 pandemic, psychiatric services should thoroughly evaluate their initial experience with COVID-19, including from the point of drug effectiveness and safety.

[Not Available]

•

Los pacientes en tratamiento con IECA o ARAII no tienen mayor riesgo de infección por SARS-COVID, ni mayor riesgo de COVID-19 grave ni de mortalidad. Por ello, deben continuar con el tratamiento, y solo estaría justificada su retirada por motivos clínicos.

•

Los pacientes con COVID-19 en tratamiento con hipolipemiantes deben continuar con ellos, especialmente aquellos con alto riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular. Se suspenderán si hay riesgo hepático o renal o si está impedida la vía oral. Se valorará el cambio de estatina si hay interacción con el tratamiento para la infección.

•

En pacientes diabéticos con COVID-19 se recomienda suspender los iSGLT-2 (gliflozinas o uricosúricos) en caso de fiebre o diarrea, y vigilar función renal y glucemia por si es necesario ajustar el resto de los antidiabéticos. La insulina es el tratamiento de elección en caso de retirada del resto de fármacos.

•

Los medicamentos psicotrópicos pueden interactuar con los fármacos utilizados para la COVID-19 y algunos de sus efectos adversos, especialmente los relacionados con la depresión respiratoria, pueden empeorar la evolución de la infección.

•

No se ha encontrado asociación entre el uso de inhibidores de la bomba de protones o anti-H2 y la aparición de COVID-19. La evidencia actual no indica la necesidad de retirar el omeprazol en los casos con clara indicación.

•

No hay evidencia científica que relacione el uso de antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (AINE) con el empeoramiento de la COVID-19, por lo que pueden usarse en el tratamiento sintomático de la infección y/u otras comorbilidades asociadas.

•

No se deben interrumpir los tratamientos crónicos con AINE u opiáceos que están bien indicados. Se recomienda elegir opioides con menos efecto inmunosupresor.

•

Durante la COVID-19 se recomienda suspender temporalmente los anticonceptivos y continuar con los anticoagulantes o antiagregantes que tomase previamente.

How Does COVID-19 Affect the Neurobiology of Suicide?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review was to analyze COVID-19 effect on the biological features of suicidal vulnerability and its interaction with suicide-related biological pathways. We carried out a narrative review of international publications on the interactions of COVID-19 with the biological bases of suicide.

RECENT FINDINGS

We hypothesize that SARS-CoV-2 interacts with multiple biological processes that underlie suicidal behavior, such as the renin-angiotensin system, nicotinic receptors, and central and systemic inflammation. Social distancing measures may also worsen subjective or objective social disconnection, thus increasing the risk of suicide. Interestingly, the drugs used to prevent suicide could be promising options to counteract brain damage caused by this coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2 interacts with multiple biological pathways involved in suicide and opens a new window for understanding the suicidal process. The development of suicide prevention treatments in the context of a pandemic may benefit from knowledge on these interactions.

COVID-19 and mental health: A review and the role of telehealth and virtual reality

On March 12, 2020, with more than 20,000 confirmed cases and almost 1000 deaths in the European Region, the World Health Organization classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic. As of August 15, 2020, there are 21.5 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and over 766,000 deaths from the virus, worldwide. Most governments have imposed quarantine measures of varied degrees of strictness on their populations in attempts to stall the spread of the infection in their communities. However, the isolation may have inflicted long-term psychological injury to the general population and, in particular, to at-risk groups such as the elderly, the mentally ill, children, and frontline healthcare staff. In this article, we offer the most up-to-date review of the effects of COVID-19 confinement on all the disorders listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. We make data-driven predictions of the impact of COVID-19 confinement on mental health outcomes and discuss the potential role of telemedicine and virtual reality in mental health screening, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring, thus improving the above outcomes in such a difficult time

[How do children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) experience lockdown during the COVID-19 outbreak?]

Objectifs

Le confinement général de la population française dans le contexte de la pandémie de COVID-19, liée au nouveau Coronavirus SARS-COV-2, est une situation potentiellement à risque pour les enfants avec un développement atypique. L’objectif de notre étude est de mieux comprendre l’état de santé mentale des enfants et adolescents avec le trouble déficit d’attention hyperactivité (TDAH) en période de confinement.

Méthodes

Cinq cent trente-huit patients ont répondu à un sondage anonyme en ligne, proposé via les réseaux sociaux et relayé ou posté sur le site des associations de personnes concernées par le TDAH durant la période de confinement.

Résultats

Une majorité des enfants et adolescents de notre enquête a connu soit un mieux-être soit un état général psychologique stable d’après leurs parents. Une diminution de l’anxiété est mise en lien avec l’interruption de la scolarité présentielle et un rythme « sur-mesure ». Pour certains, l’abandon des aménagements et le volume de tâches ont posé problème avec des attitudes d’opposition et d’évitement. Les parents décrivent également une prise de conscience des difficultés de leurs enfants, ce qui ressort comme un élément constructif. Les enfants dont l’état se dégrade ont à la fois des difficultés comportementales et émotionnelles. En ce qui concerne le recours aux soins, la téléconsultation comme outil de continuité de soins a été largement appréciée.

Conclusions

Avant les contraintes liées à la crise sanitaire, les aspects scolaires sont cités comme principaux facteurs influençant l’état émotionnel de l’enfant et de l’adolescent avec TDAH dans le contexte de confinement.

[Challenges for psychotropics in the context of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic]

French recommendations have been proposed for psychotropics use and possible adaptations during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Between uncertainties linked to the lack of data and speculations about possible benefits of psychotropics against the coronavirus, we propose here elements allowing to base the pharmacotherapeutic decisions potentially useful in Covid+ patients with psychiatric disorders.

[Panic and pandemic: Review of the literature on the links between panic disorder and the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic]

L’état de panique associé à la pandémie liée au SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) incite à s’interroger sur les troubles anxieux que cette situation pourrait générer ou aggraver. Si la littérature a déjà fourni des projections généralistes en la matière, les données concrètes concernent à ce stage davantage le trouble de stress post-traumatique et le trouble obsessionnel compulsif, tandis que quelques évaluations s’intéressent au cadre nosographie du trouble anxieux généralisé. Le trouble panique ne se voit que peu ou pas cité et l’évocation de la « panique », au sens social, la supplante largement. Bien que d’une légitimité clinique encore débattue, le trouble panique qualifié de « respiratoire » pourrait se voir augmenter en nombre et/ou être intensifié chez les patients qui en présentent déjà. D’éventuelles situations co-morbides entre un tel trouble et la COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) doivent inciter à certaines précautions en matière de prescriptions médicamenteuses, notamment en lien avec les traitements ou situations, sources d’hypokaliémie : (i) le salbutamol, source potentielle de surconsommation, notamment chez les patients anxieux ; (ii) l’infection par le SARS-CoV-2 et plus encore en cas de diarrhées et/ou vomissements. L’hypokaliémie est associée à un risque accru de torsade de pointe, il convient donc également d’être prudent en matière de prescription de psychotropes à risque : comme avec le citalopram et l’escitalopram, des antidépresseurs indiqués dans le trouble panique ou encore l’hydroxyzine, à visée anxiolytique. Ces données sont de nature à resituer l’importance de la prise en considération du trouble panique dans le cadre de la pandémie en cours.