Developing air pollution concentration fields for health studies using multiple methods: Cross-comparison and evaluation

The impact of exposure assessment on associations between air pollution and cardiovascular mortality risks in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Despite a growing literature for complex air quality models, scientific evidence lacks of the influences of varying exposure assessments and air quality data sources on the estimated mortality risks. This case-crossover study estimated cardiovascular mortality risks from fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) exposures, using varying exposure methods, to aid understanding of the impact of exposure methods in the health risk estimation. We used individual-level cardiovascular mortality data in the city of Rio de Janeiro, 2012-2016. PM2.5 and O3 exposure levels (from the date of death to seven prior days [lag0-7]) were estimated at the individual level or district level using either the WRF-Chem modeling data or monitoring data, resulting in a total of 10 exposure methods. The exposure-response relationships were estimated using multiple logistic regressions. The changes in cardiovascular mortality were represented as an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for an interquartile range (IQR) increase in the exposures. Results showed that socioeconomically more advantaged populations had lower access to the stationary monitoring networks. Higher variance in the estimated exposure levels across the 10 exposure methods was found for PM2.5 than O3. PM2.5 exposure was not associated with mortality risk in any exposure methods. WRF-Chem-based O3 exposure estimated for each individual of the entire population found a significant mortality risk (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.11), but not the other exposure methods. Higher risks for females and older populations were suggested for O3 estimates estimated for each individual using the WRF-Chem data. Findings indicate that decisions on exposure methods and data sources can lead to substantially varying implications for air pollution risks and highlight the need for comprehensive exposure and health impact assessments to aid local decision-making for air pollution and public health.

Effects of environmental temperature extremes exposure on sperm quality - evidence from a prospective cohort study in Anhui Province, China

Extreme weather is becoming more frequent due to drastic changes in the climate. Despite this, the body of research focused on the association between temperature extreme events and sperm quality remains sparse. In this study, we elucidate the impact of exposure to environmental temperature extremes on sperm quality. Data for this investigation were derived from the Anhui Prospective Assisted Reproduction Cohort, encompassing the period from 2015 to 2020. Parameters such as sperm concentration, total sperm count, total motility, progressive motility, total motile sperm count, and progressive motile sperm count were quantified from semen samples. We assessed the exposure of participants to temperature extremes during the 0-90 days prior to sampling. This investigation encompassed 15,112 participants, yielding 28,267 semen samples. Our research findings indicate that exposure to low temperature extreme for three consecutive days (at the first percentile threshold) has a detrimental correlation with sperm count parameters and concentration. Similar trends were observed with the second percentile threshold, where significant adverse effects typically manifested after a four-day exposure sequence. Analysis of high temperature extreme showed that exposure at the 98th percentile had adverse effects on all six sperm quality parameters, and the sperm count parameter was particularly sensitive to high temperature, showing significant results immediately after three days of exposure. When considering even more temperature extreme (99th percentile), the negative consequences were more pronounced on the sperm count parameter. Additionally, progressive motility showed a stronger negative response. In summary, parameters associated with sperm count are particularly vulnerable to temperature extremes exposure. Exposure to high temperature extremes environments may also be associated with a decrease in sperm concentration and vitality. The findings of this study suggest that male population should pay attention to avoid exposure to temperature extreme environment, which has important significance for improving the quality of human fertility.

Spatialized PM2.5 during COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil's most populous southern city: implications for post-pandemic era

Brazil has experienced one of the highest COVID-19 fatality rates globally. While numerous studies have explored the potential connection between air pollution, specifically fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and the exacerbation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the majority of this research has been conducted in foreign regions-Europe, the United States, and China-correlating generalized pollution levels with health-related scopes. In this study, our objective is to investigate the localized connection between exposure to air pollution exposure and its health implications within a specific Brazilian municipality, focusing on COVID-19 susceptibility. Our investigation involves assessing pollution levels through spatial interpolation of in situ PM2.5 measurements. A network of affordable sensors collected data across 9 regions in Curitiba, as well as its metropolitan counterpart, Araucaria. Our findings distinctly reveal a significant positive correlation (with r-values reaching up to 0.36, p-value < 0.01) between regions characterized by higher levels of pollution, particularly during the winter months (with r-values peaking at 0.40, p-value < 0.05), with both COVID-19 mortality and incidence rates. This correlation gains added significance due to the intricate interplay between urban atmospheric pollution and regional human development indices. Notably, heightened pollution aligns with industrial hubs and intensified vehicular activity. The spatial analysis performed in this study assumes a pivotal role by identifying priority regions that require targeted action post-COVID. By comprehending the localized dynamics between air pollution and its health repercussions, tailored strategies can be implemented to alleviate these effects and ensure the well-being of the public.

Monitoring vs. modeled exposure data in time-series studies of ambient air pollution and acute health outcomes

BACKGROUND

Population-based short-term air pollution health studies often have limited spatiotemporally representative exposure data, leading to concerns of exposure measurement error.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the use of monitoring and modeled exposure metrics in time-series analyses of air pollution and cardiorespiratory emergency department (ED) visits.

METHODS

We obtained daily counts of ED visits for Atlanta, GA during 2009-2013. We leveraged daily ZIP code level concentration estimates for eight pollutants from nine exposure metrics. Metrics included central monitor (CM), monitor-based (inverse distance weighting, kriging), model-based [community multiscale air quality (CMAQ), land use regression (LUR)], and satellite-based measures. We used Poisson models to estimate air pollution health associations using the different exposure metrics. The approach involved: (1) assessing CM-based associations, (2) determining if non-CM metrics can reproduce CM-based associations, and (3) identifying potential value added of incorporating full spatiotemporal information provided by non-CM metrics.

RESULTS

Using CM exposures, we observed associations between cardiovascular ED visits and carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, fine particulate matter, elemental and organic carbon, and between respiratory ED visits and ozone. Non-CM metrics were largely able to reproduce CM-based associations, although some unexpected results using CMAQ- and LUR-based metrics reduced confidence in these data for some spatiotemporally-variable pollutants. Associations with nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide were only detected, or were stronger, when using metrics that incorporate all available monitoring data (i.e., inverse distance weighting and kriging).

SIGNIFICANCE

The use of routinely-collected ambient monitoring data for exposure assignment in time-series studies of large metropolitan areas is a sound approach, particularly when data from multiple monitors are available. More sophisticated approaches derived from CMAQ, LUR, or satellites may add value when monitoring data are inadequate and if paired with thorough data characterization. These results are useful for interpretation of existing literature and for improving exposure assessment in future studies.

IMPACT STATEMENT

This study compared and interpreted the use of monitoring and modeled exposure metrics in a daily time-series analysis of air pollution and cardiorespiratory emergency department visits. The results suggest that the use of routinely-collected ambient monitoring data in population-based short-term air pollution and health studies is a sound approach for exposure assignment in large metropolitan regions. CMAQ-, LUR-, and satellite-based metrics may allow for health effects estimation when monitoring data are sparse, if paired with thorough data characterization. These results are useful for interpretation of existing health effects literature and for improving exposure assessment in future air pollution epidemiology studies.

Unexpected Performance Improvements of Nitrogen Dioxide and Ozone Sensors by Including Carbon Monoxide Sensor Signal

Low-cost air quality (LCAQ) sensors are increasingly being used for community air quality monitoring. However, data collected by low-cost sensors contain significant noise, and proper calibration of these sensors remains a widely discussed, but not yet fully addressed, area of concern. In this study, several LCAQ sensors measuring nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3) were deployed in six cities in the United States (Atlanta, GA; New York City, NY; Sacramento, CA; Riverside, CA; Portland, OR; Phoenix, AZ) to evaluate the impacts of different climatic and geographical conditions on their performance and calibration. Three calibration methods were applied, including regression via linear and polynomial models and random forest methods. When signals from carbon monoxide (CO) sensors were included in the calibration models for NO2 and O3 sensors, model performance generally increased, with pronounced improvements in selected cities such as Riverside and New York City. Such improvements may be due to (1) temporal co-variation between concentrations of CO and NO2 and/or between CO and O3; (2) different performance levels of low-cost CO, NO2, and O3 sensors; and (3) different impacts of environmental conditions on sensor performance. The results showed an innovative approach for improving the calibration of NO2 and O3 sensors by including CO sensor signals into the calibration models. Community users of LCAQ sensors may be able to apply these findings further to enhance the data quality of their deployed NO2 and O3 monitors.