Pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Induced intracranial spike activity in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

Pediatric Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Mapping and Monitoring in Brain Surgery

SUMMARY

Similar to adults, children undergoing brain surgery can significantly benefit from intraoperative neurophysiologic mapping and monitoring. Although young brains present the advantage of increased plasticity, during procedures in close proximity to eloquent regions, the risk of irreversible neurological compromise remains and can be lowered further by these techniques. More so, pathologies specific to the pediatric population, such as neurodevelopmental lesions, often result in medically refractory epilepsy. Thus, their successful surgical treatment also relies on accurate demarcation and resection of the epileptogenic zone, processes in which intraoperative electrocorticography is often employed. However, stemming from the development and maturation of the central and peripheral nervous systems as the child grows, intraoperative neurophysiologic testing in this population poses methodologic and interpretative challenges even to experienced clinical neurophysiologists. For example, it is difficult to perform awake craniotomies and language testing in the majority of pediatric patients. In addition, children may be more prone to intraoperative seizures and exhibit afterdischarges more frequently during functional mapping using electrical cortical stimulation because of high stimulation thresholds needed to depolarize immature cortex. Moreover, choice of anesthetic regimen and doses may be different in pediatric patients, as is the effect of these drugs on immature brain; these factors add additional complexity in terms of interpretation and analysis of neurophysiologic recordings. Below, we are describing the modalities commonly used during intraoperative neurophysiologic testing in pediatric brain surgery, with emphasis on age-specific clinical indications, methodology, and challenges.

Lateralized Periodic Discharges During Remifentanil Infusion

Lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs) are a common electroencephalographic (EEG) pattern in the neurointensive care unit setting. LPDs are typically observed in association with acute structural lesions of the brain with different etiologies. There are no reports describing a link between the occurrence of LPDs and the administration of remifentanil. Remifentanil is a rapid-acting pure μ-opioid receptor agonist, which is indicated to provide analgesia and sedation in mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units. We present a case of an 84-year-old man with neuroglycopenia who developed LPDs while sedated with remifentanil. We report, for the first time, a potential relationship between remifentanil and the induction of LPDs.

Sevoflurane-based enhancement of phase-amplitude coupling and localization of the epileptogenic zone

OBJECTIVE

Phase-amplitude coupling between high-frequency (≥150 Hz) and delta (3-4 Hz) oscillations - modulation index (MI) - is a promising, objective biomarker of epileptogenicity. We determined whether sevoflurane anesthesia preferentially enhances this metric within the epileptogenic zone.

METHODS

This is an observational study of intraoperative electrocorticography data from 621 electrodes chronically implanted into eight patients with drug-resistant, focal epilepsy. All patients were anesthetized with sevoflurane during resective surgery, which subsequently resulted in seizure control. We classified 'removed' and 'retained' brain sites as epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic, respectively. Mixed model analysis determined which anesthetic stage optimized MI-based classification of epileptogenic sites.

RESULTS

MI increased as a function of anesthetic stage, ranging from baseline (i.e., oxygen alone) to 2.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane, preferentially at sites showing higher initial MI values. This phenomenon was accentuated just prior to sevoflurane reaching 2.0 MAC, at which time, the odds of a site being classified as epileptogenic were enhanced by 86.6 times for every increase of 1.0 MI.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative MI best localized the epileptogenic zone immediately before sevoflurane reaching 2.0 MAC in this small cohort of patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

Prospective, large cohort studies are warranted to determine whether sevoflurane anesthesia can reduce the need for extraoperative, invasive evaluation.

Effects of propofol on cortico-cortical evoked potentials in the dorsal language white matter pathway

OBJECTIVE

In order to evaluate the clinical utility even under general anesthesia, the present study aimed to clarify the effect of anesthesia on the cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs).

METHODS

We analyzed 14 patients' data in monitoring the integrity of the dorsal language pathway by using CCEPs both under general anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil and awake condition, with the main aim of clarifying the effect of anesthesia on the distribution and waveform of CCEPs.

RESULTS

The distribution of larger CCEP response sites, including the locus of the maximum CCEP response site, was marginally affected by anesthesia. With regard to similarity of waveforms, the mean waveform correlation coefficient indicated a strong agreement. CCEP N1 amplitude increased by an average of 25.8% from general anesthesia to waking, except three patients. CCEP N1 latencies had no correlation in changes between the two conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that the distribution of larger CCEP responses was marginally affected by anesthesia and that the CCEP N1 amplitude had tendency to increase from general anesthesia to the awake condition.

SIGNIFICANCE

The CCEP method provides the efficiency of intraoperative monitoring for dorsal language white matter pathway even under general anesthesia.

Effect of anesthesia on electrocorticography for localization of epileptic focus: Literature review and future directions

Intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG) is a useful technique to guide resections in epilepsy surgery and is mostly performed under general anesthesia. In this systematic literature review, we seek to investigate the effect of anesthetic agents on the quality and reliability of ECoG for localization of the epileptic focus. We conducted a systematic search using PubMed and EMBASE until January 2019, aiming to review the effects of anesthesia on ECoG yield. Fifty-eight studies were included from 1016 reviewed. There are favorable reports for dexmedetomidine and remifentanil during ECoG recording. There is inadequate, or sometimes conflicting, evidence to support using enflurane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol. There is evidence to avoid halothane, nitrous oxide, etomidate, ketamine, thiopental, methohexital, midazolam, fentanyl, and alfentanil due to undesired effects. Depth of anesthesia, intraoperative awareness, and surgical outcomes were not consistently evaluated. Available studies provide helpful information about the effect of anesthesia on ECoG to localize the epileptic focus. The proper use of anesthetic agents and careful dose titration, and effective communication between the neurophysiologist and anesthesiologist based on ECoG activity are essential in optimizing recordings. Anesthesia is a crucial variate to consider in the design of studies investigating ECoG and related biomarkers.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2017

This paper is the fortieth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2017 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).

Verbal learning and memory outcome in selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus temporal lobe resection in patients with hippocampal sclerosis

PURPOSE

With the advent of new very selective techniques like thermal laser ablation to treat drug-resistant focal epilepsy, the controversy of resection size in relation to seizure outcome versus cognitive deficits has gained new relevance. The purpose of this study was to test the influence of the selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH) versus nonselective temporal lobe resection (TLR) on seizure outcome and cognition in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) and histopathological verified hippocampal sclerosis (HS).

METHODS

We identified 108 adults (>16years) with HS, operated between 1995 and 2009 in Denmark. Exclusion criteria are the following: Intelligence below normal range, right hemisphere dominance, other native languages than Danish, dual pathology, and missing follow-up data. Thus, 56 patients were analyzed. The patients were allocated to SAH (n=22) or TLR (n=34) based on intraoperative electrocorticography. Verbal learning and verbal memory were tested pre- and postsurgery.

RESULTS

Seizure outcome did not differ between patients operated using the SAH versus the TLR at 1year (p=0.951) nor at 7years (p=0.177). Verbal learning was more affected in patients resected in the left hemisphere than in the right (p=0.002). In patients with left-sided TLR, a worsening in verbal memory performance was found (p=0.011). Altogether, 73% were seizure-free for 1year and 64% for 7years after surgery.

CONCLUSION

In patients with drug-resistant focal MTLE, HS and no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs of dual pathology, selective amygdalohippocampectomy results in sustained seizure freedom and better memory function compared with patients operated with nonselective temporal lobe resection.