Amiodarone, a multi-channel blocker, enhances anticonvulsive effect of carbamazepine in the mouse maximal electroshock model

Nicorandil mitigates amiodarone-induced pulmonary toxicity and fibrosis in association with the inhibition of lung TGF-β1/PI3K/Akt1-p/mTOR axis in rats

The long-term side effect of the antiarrhythmic drug, amiodarone (AMIO), such as lung toxicity, remains a critical clinical issue. The previous knowledge denotes diverse antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic properties of the anti-anginal drug, nicorandil (NI). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the possible protective effect of NI on pulmonary tissue remodelling following AMIO-induced lung toxicity. The included rats were assigned into four equal groups (n = 8): (1) control, (2) control group that received NI 10 mg kg^-1  day^-1 , (3) model group that received AMIO in a dose of 60 mg kg^-1  day^-1 , and (4) treated group (AMIO-NI) that were treated with AMIO plus NI as shown above. Drug administration continued for 10 weeks. AMIO resulted in deteriorated (p < 0.001) pulmonary functions accompanied by respiratory acidosis. AMIO showed an obvious histological injury score with intense collagen deposition, disturbed nitric oxide synthase enzymes (NOS/iNOS), and increased alpha smooth muscle actin expression. Furthermore, AMIO upregulated the transforming growth factor (TGF-β1)/phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K)-Akt1-p/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) axis, which determined the possible mechanism of AMIO on pulmonary remodelling. NI treatment significantly (p < 0.001) prevented the AMIO-induced lung toxicity, as well as inhibited the TGF-β1/PI3K/Akt1-p/mTOR axis in the lung tissue of rats. The results were confirmed by an in-vitro study. CONCLUSION: The current results revealed that NI was effective in preserving the lung structure and functions. Amelioration of the oxidative stress and modulation of TGF-β1/PI3K/Akt1-p/mTOR have been achieved. This study suggests NI administration as a preventive therapy from the serious pulmonary fibrosis side effect of AMIO.

Trimetazidine, an Anti-Ischemic Drug, Reduces the Antielectroshock Effects of Certain First-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs

Trimetazidine (TMZ), an anti-ischemic drug for improving cellular metabolism, is mostly administered to patients with poorly controlled ischemic heart disease (IHD). Since IHD is considered the most frequent causative factor of cardiac arrhythmias, and these often coexist with seizure disorders, we decided to investigate the effect of TMZ in the electroconvulsive threshold test (ECT) and its influence on the action of four first-generation antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test (MES) in mice. The TMZ (up to 120 mg/kg) did not affect the ECT, but applied at doses of 20–120 mg/kg it decreased the antielectroshock action of phenobarbital. The TMZ (50–120 mg/kg) reduced the effect of phenytoin, and, when administered at a dose of 120 mg/kg, it diminished the action of carbamazepine. All of these revealed interactions seem to be pharmacodynamic, since the TMZ did not affect the brain levels of antiepileptic drugs. Furthermore, the combination of TMZ with valproate (but not with other antiepileptic drugs) significantly impaired motor coordination, evaluated using the chimney test. Long-term memory, assessed with a passive-avoidance task, was not affected by either the TMZ or its combinations with antiepileptic drugs. The obtained results suggest that TMZ may not be beneficial as an add-on therapy in patients with IHD and epilepsy.

Effects of Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Antiepileptic Drug Action-A Critical Review of Experimental Findings

Severe cardiac arrhythmias developing in the course of seizures increase the risk of SUDEP (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy). Hence, epilepsy patients with pre-existing arrhythmias should receive appropriate pharmacotherapy. Concomitant treatment with antiarrhythmic and antiseizure medications creates, however, the possibility of drug–drug interactions. This is due, among other reasons, to a similar mechanism of action. Both groups of drugs inhibit the conduction of electrical impulses in excitable tissues. The aim of this review was the analysis of such interactions in animal seizure models, including the maximal electroshock (MES) test in mice, a widely accepted screening test for antiepileptic drugs.

Potassium channel-driven bioelectric signalling regulates metastasis in triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

There is a critical need to better understand the mechanisms that drive local cell invasion and metastasis to develop new therapeutics targeting metastatic disease. Bioelectricity is an important mediator of cellular processes and changes in the resting membrane potential (RMP) are associated with increased cancer cell invasion. However, whether the RMP can be used to target invading cancer cells is unknown.

METHODS

We employed both genetic and pharmacological manipulation of potassium channel activity and characterized the effects on breast cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro, and metastasis in an animal model of breast cancer.

FINDINGS

Our data demonstrate that altering the RMP of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells by manipulating potassium channel expression increases in vitro invasion, in vivo tumour growth and metastasis, and is accompanied by changes in gene expression associated with cell adhesion.

INTERPRETATION

We describe a novel mechanism for RMP-mediated cell migration involving cadherin-11 and the MAPK pathway. Importantly, we identify a new strategy to target metastatic TNBC in vivo by repurposing an FDA-approved potassium channel blocker. Our results demonstrate that bioelectricity regulates cancer cell invasion and metastasis which could lead to a new class of therapeutics for patients with metastatic disease.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R00-CA207866 to M.J.O.), Tufts University (Start-up funds from the School of Engineering to M.J.O., Tufts Collaborates Award to M.J.O. and M.L.), Allen Discovery centre program (Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group (12,171) to M.L.), and Breast Cancer Alliance Young Investigator Grant to M.J.O, Laidlaw Scholar funding to D.S. M.L. also gratefully acknowledges support of the Barton Family Foundation.

Cardioprotective effects of amiodarone in a rat model of epilepsy-induced cardiac dysfunction

Cardiac dysfunction is one of the leading causes of death in epilepsy. The anti-arrhythmic drug, amiodarone, is under investigation for its therapeutic effects in epilepsy. We aimed to evaluate the possible effects of amiodarone on cardiac injury during status epilepticus, as it can cause prolongation of the QT interval. Five rat groups were enrolled in the study; three control groups (1) Control, (2) Control-lithium and (3) Control-Amio, treated with 150 mg/kg/intraperitoneal amiodarone, (4) Epilepsy model, induced by sequential lithium/pilocarpine administration, and (5) the epilepsy-Amio group. The model group expressed a typical clinical picture of epileptiform activity confirmed by the augmented electroencephalogram alpha and beta spikes. The anticonvulsive effect of amiodarone was prominent, it diminished (p < 0.001) the severity of seizures and hence, deaths and reduced serum noradrenaline levels. In the model group, the electrocardiogram findings revealed tachycardia, prolongation of the corrected QT (QTc) interval, depressed ST segments and increased myocardial oxidative stress. The in-vitro myocardial performance (contraction force and - (df/dt)_max ) was also reduced. Amiodarone decreased (p < 0.001) the heart rate, improved ST segment depression, and myocardial contractility with no significant change in the duration of the QTc interval. Amiodarone preserved the cardiac histological structure and reduced the myocardial injury markers represented by serum Troponin-I, oxidative stress and IL-1. Amiodarone pretreatment prevented the anticipated cardiac injury induced during epilepsy. Amiodarone possessed an anticonvulsive potential, protected the cardiac muscle and preserved its histological architecture. Therefore, amiodarone could be recommended as a protective therapy against cardiac dysfunction during epileptic seizures with favourable effect on seizure activity.

Risk of Cardiac Morbidities and Sudden Death in Patients With Epilepsy and No History of Cardiac Disease: A Population-Based Nationwide Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of epilepsy on secondary cardiac morbidities and sudden death in patients with epilepsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present cohort study evaluated data obtained from a subset of adult patients listed in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, diagnosis code of epilepsy from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2013; the date of epilepsy diagnosis or antiepilepsy drug prescription was defined as the index date. Patients with cardiac disease prior to the index date were excluded, and the remaining patients were categorized into epilepsy and nonepilepsy groups. Frequency matching was performed to balance the covariates across groups for the comparison of outcomes. The development of myocardial infarction (MI) and arrhythmia and/or the occurrence of sudden death were the outcomes for evaluation. A Cox proportional hazards regression model and competing risk analysis were used to compare the risks of cardiac morbidities and sudden death between groups.

RESULTS

The final analysis included a total of 5411 patients with epilepsy and 21,644 participants without epilepsy. The epilepsy group had significantly higher risks for development of MI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95% CI, 1.62 to 1.81; P<.001) and arrhythmia (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.25; P<.001) and the occurrence of sudden death (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.53 to 2.18; P<.001) compared with the nonepilepsy group.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the risks for development of MI and arrhythmia and the occurrence of sudden death were higher in patients with epilepsy. These findings support the hypothesis that epilepsy may lead to secondary cardiac dysfunction and increases the risk of sudden death.

Sotalol does not interfere with the antielectroshock action of selected second-generation antiepileptic drugs in mice

Background

Due to blocking β-receptors, and potassium KCNH2 channels, sotalol may influence seizure phenomena. In the previous study, we have shown that sotalol potentiated the antielectroshock action of phenytoin and valproate in mice.

Materials and methods

As a continuation of previous experiments, we examined the effect of sotalol on the action of four chosen second-generation antiepileptic drugs (oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, pregabalin, and topiramate) against the maximal electroshock in mice. Undesired effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor impairment) and step-through passive-avoidance task (long-term memory deficits). Finally, brain concentrations of antiepileptics were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, while those of sotalol by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry.

Results

Sotalol at doses of up to 100 mg/kg did not affect the electroconvulsive threshold. Applied at doses of 80–100 mg/kg, sotalol did not affect the antielectroshock action of oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, pregabalin, or topiramate. Sotalol alone and in combinations with antiepileptics impaired neither motor performance nor long-term memory. Finally, sotalol significantly decreased the brain concentrations of lamotrigine and increased those of oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Pharmacokinetic interactions, however, did not influence the final antielectroshock effects of above-mentioned drug combinations. On the other hand, the brain concentrations of sotalol were not changed by second-generation antiepileptics used in this study.

Conclusion

Sotalol did not reduce the antielectroshock action of four second-generation antiepileptic drugs examined in this study. Therefore, this antidepressant drug should not interfere with antiseizure effects of lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, and topiramate in patients with epilepsy. To draw final conclusions, our preclinical data should still be confirmed in other experimental models and clinical conditions.

Amiodarone Enhances Anticonvulsive Effect of Oxcarbazepine and Pregabalin in the Mouse Maximal Electroshock Model

Accumulating experimental studies show that antiarrhythmic and antiepileptic drugs share some molecular mechanisms of action and can interact with each other. In this study, the influence of amiodarone (a class III antiarrhythmic drug) on the antiseizure action of four second-generation antiepileptic drugs was evaluated in the maximal electroshock model in mice. Amiodarone, although ineffective in the electroconvulsive threshold test, significantly potentiated the antielectroshock activity of oxcarbazepine and pregabalin. Amiodarone, given alone or in combination with oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, or topiramate, significantly disturbed long-term memory in the passive-avoidance task in mice. Brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were not affected by amiodarone. However, the brain concentration of amiodarone was significantly elevated by oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and pregabalin. Additionally, oxcarbazepine and pregabalin elevated the brain concentration of desethylamiodarone, the main metabolite of amiodarone. In conclusion, potentially beneficial action of amiodarone in epilepsy patients seems to be limited by neurotoxic effects of amiodarone. Although results of this study should still be confirmed in chronic protocols of treatment, special precautions are recommended in clinical conditions. Coadministration of amiodarone, even at low therapeutic doses, with antiepileptic drugs should be carefully monitored to exclude undesired effects related to accumulation of the antiarrhythmic drug and its main metabolite, desethylamiodarone.

Interactions of antiepileptic drugs with drugs approved for the treatment of indications other than epilepsy

Introduction: Comorbidities of epilepsy may significantly interfere with its treatment as diseases in the general population are also encountered in epilepsy patients and some of them even more frequently (for instance, depression, anxiety, or heart disease). Obviously, some drugs approved for other than epilepsy indications can modify the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptics. Areas covered: This review highlights the drug-drug interactions between antiepileptics and aminophylline, some antidepressant, antiarrhythmic (class I-IV), selected antihypertensive drugs and non-barbiturate injectable anesthetics (ketamine, propofol, etomidate, and alphaxalone). The data were reviewed mainly from experimental models of seizures. Whenever possible, clinical data were provided. PUBMED data base was the main search source.Expert opinion: Aminophylline generally reduced the protective activity of antiepileptics, which, to a certain degree, was consistent with scarce clinical data on methylxanthine derivatives and worse seizure control. The only antiarrhythmic with this profile of action was mexiletine when co-administered with VPA. Among antidepressants and non-barbiturate injectable anesthetics, trazodone, mianserin and etomidate or alphaxalone, respectively, negatively affected the anticonvulsant action of some antiepileptic drugs. Clinical data indicate that only amoxapine, bupropion, clomipramine and maprotiline should be used with caution. Possibly, drugs reducing the anticonvulsant potential of antiepileptics should be avoided in epilepsy patients.

Comorbidity between epilepsy and cardiac arrhythmias: Implication for treatment

Epilepsy is often comorbid with either neurological or nonneurological diseases. The association between epilepsy and cardiac arrhythmias is not infrequent, mostly in patients with severe forms of epilepsy or critically ill. Remarkably, these medical conditions share many similarities. Vascular and genetic disorders may predispose to both seizures and abnormalities of cardiac electrophysiology. Repeated and uncontrolled seizures may favor potentially life-threatening arrhythmias. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may facilitate the occurrence of cardiac arrhythmias by acting on ionic channels at heart level. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) can have effects on ionic channels expressed in the brain, as suggested by their efficacy in treating patients with rare forms of epilepsy; AADs may also be proconvulsant, mainly during their overdosage. In clinical practice, the AEDs with the lowest risk to influence cardiac electrophysiology are to be preferred in patients presenting with either seizures or arrhythmias. Traditional AEDs should be avoided because of their arrhythmogenic properties and enzyme-inducing effects, which may make ineffective the concomitant treatment with AADs. Some of the newer AEDs can rarely affect cardiac rhythm, and electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring should be warranted.

Dronedarone (a multichannel blocker) enhances the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, but not that of lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice

Accumulating experimental evidence indicates that some recently licensed antiarrhythmic drugs, including dronedarone (a multichannel blocker) play a crucial role in initiation of seizures in both, in vivo and in vitro studies. Some of these antiarrhythmic drugs elevate the threshold for maximal electroconvulsions and enhance the anticonvulsant potency of classical antiepileptic drugs in preclinical studies. This study was aimed at determining the influence of dronedarone (an antiarrhythmic drug) on the anticonvulsant potency of four novel antiepileptic drugs (lacosamide, lamotrigine, pregabalin and topiramate) in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure model in mice. To exclude any potential pharmacokinetic contribution of dronedarone to the observed interactions, total brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured. Dronedarone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly enhanced the anticonvulsant potency of lamotrigine, by reducing its ED₅₀ value from 7.67 mg/kg to 4.19 mg/kg (P < 0.05), in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. On the contrary, dronedarone (50 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the anticonvulsant properties of lacosamide, pregabalin or topiramate in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. Measurement of total brain concentrations of lamotrigine revealed that dronedarone did not significantly alter total brain concentrations of lamotrigine in experimental animals. Additionally, the combination of dronedarone with pregabalin significantly impaired motor coordination in animals subjected to the chimney test. In contrast, the combinations of other studied antiepileptic drugs with dronedarone had no negative influence on motor coordination in mice. It is advisable to combine dronedarone with lamotrigine to enhance the anticonvulsant potency of the latter drug. The combinations of dronedarone with lacosamide, pregabalin and topiramate resulted in neutral interactions in the maximal electroshock-induced seizure test in mice. However, a special caution is advised to patients receiving both, pregabalin and dronedarone due to some possible adverse effects that might occur with respect to motor coordination.

Influence of dronedarone (a class III antiarrhythmic drug) on the anticonvulsant potency of four classical antiepileptic drugs in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice

Increasing evidence indicates that some antiarrhythmic drugs play a pivotal role in seizures, not only in vivo studies on animals, but also in clinical trials. Some of these antiarrhythmic drugs potentiate or alleviate the anticonvulsant action of the classical antiepileptic drugs. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of dronedarone (DRO-a multichannel blocker belonging to the class III of antiarrhythmic drugs) on the anticonvulsant effects of four standard antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin and valproate) in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice. Potential acute adverse effects exerted by the antiepileptic drugs combined with DRO were evaluated in three behavioral tests (chimney, grip-strength and passive avoidance). To confirm the nature of interaction, total brain concentrations of antiepileptic drugs were measured. DRO (50 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduces the anticonvulsant potency of phenytoin (P < 0.05), having no impact on that of carbamazepine, phenobarbital and valproate in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice. DRO (50 mg/kg) neither changed total brain concentrations of phenytoin in mice, nor affected normal behavior in experimental animals subjected to the chimney, grip-strength and passive avoidance tests. In conclusion, DRO should not be combined with phenytoin because it reduced the anticonvulsant effects of the latter drug in experimental animals. The combined administration of DRO with carbamazepine, phenobarbital and valproate resulted in neutral interaction between these drugs in the tonic-clonic seizure model in mice.

Interactions of Mexiletine with Novel Antiepileptic Drugs in the Maximal Electroshock Test in Mice: An Isobolographic Analysis

The aim of the study was to evaluate precisely the type of interactions between mexiletine (an antiarrhythmic drug) and four new generation antiepileptic drugs: lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, topiramate and pregabalin in the maximal electroshock test in mice (MES). The isobolographic analysis was used to assess the nature of interactions between the tested drugs. Total brain concentrations of antiepileptics were also measured to detect possible pharmacokinetic interactions. The results obtained indicated that the mixture of mexiletine and pregabalin at the fixed ratios of 1:1 and 3:1 led to supra-additive interaction in terms of seizure suppression, while the proportion of 1:3 occurred additive. Synergism was also demonstrated for the combination of mexiletine and topiramate in all three proportions. Combinations of mexiletine with lamotrigine and mexiletine with oxcarbazepine were found to be additive. Adverse-effect profiles of mexiletine, antiepileptics and drug combinations were evaluated in the chimney test (motor coordination) and step-through passive-avoidance task (long-term memory). Mexiletine and drug combinations did not impair long-term memory. Moreover, all combinations of mexiletine with lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and topiramate had no significant effect on motor coordination. However, the results from the chimney test indicated that pregabalin, administered alone at its ED₅₀ dose from the MES-test, significantly impaired motor performance. Similar adverse effects were observed when mexiletine was co-administered with pregabalin at the fixed-dose ratio combinations of 1:1 and 1:3. However, reduction of pregabalin dose at the fixed ratio of 3:1 seems to prevent significant motor impairment. The results may indicate that mexiletine can be considered as an adjunctive drug in antiepileptic treatment, particularly in patients with concomitant cardiac arrhythmia.

A predictive index of biomarkers for ictogenesis from tier I safety pharmacology testing that may warrant tier II EEG studies

Three significant contributions to the field of safety pharmacology were recently published detailing the use of electroencephalography (EEG) by telemetry in a critical role in the successful evaluation of a compound during drug development (1] Authier, Delatte, Kallman, Stevens & Markgraf; JPTM 2016; 81:274-285; 2] Accardi, Pugsley, Forster, Troncy, Huang & Authier; JPTM; 81: 47-59; 3] Bassett, Troncy, Pouliot, Paquette, Ascaha, & Authier; JPTM 2016; 70: 230-240). These authors present a convincing case for monitoring neocortical biopotential waveforms (EEG, ECoG, etc) during preclinical toxicology studies as an opportunity for early identification of a central nervous system (CNS) risk during Investigational New Drug (IND) Enabling Studies. This review is about "ictogenesis" not "epileptogenesis". It is intended to characterize overt behavioral and physiological changes suggestive of drug-induced neurotoxicity/ictogenesis in experimental animals during Tier 1 safety pharmacology testing, prior to first dose administration in man. It is the presence of these predictive or comorbid biomarkers expressed during the requisite conduct of daily clinical or cage side observations, and in early ICH S7A Tier I CNS, pulmonary and cardiovascular safety study designs that should initiate an early conversation regarding Tier II inclusion of EEG monitoring. We conclude that there is no single definitive clinical marker for seizure liability but plasma exposures might add to set proper safety margins when clinical convulsions are observed. Even the observation of a study-related full tonic-clonic convulsion does not establish solid ground to require the financial and temporal investment of a full EEG study under the current regulatory standards.

PREFATORY NOTE

For purposes of this review, we have adopted the FDA term "sponsor" as it refers to any person who takes the responsibility for and initiates a nonclinical investigations of new molecular entities; FDA uses the term "sponsor" primarily in relation to investigational new drug application submissions.