Treating disease progression with osimertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer: novel targeted agents and combination strategies

Whispers in the Lungs: Small Extracellular Vesicles in Lung Cancer and COPD Crosstalk

Lung cancer is one of the deadliest forms of cancer. Its prognosis becomes even worse when it co-occurs with other diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Both illnesses have numerous shared risk factors, including the use of tobacco smoke, and have similar underlying mechanisms like long-term inflammation. There are some other less studied but equally important molecules, like small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), that have been shown to mediate effective communication at the cellular level and may affect the progression of a disease or cause resistance to therapies. In sEVs from lung cancer tumors, there are onco-proteins (e.g., tumor initiator EGFR mutations, onco-miR, miR-21), while in sEVs from patients with COPD, there are pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-6 and TNF-α that enhance airway inflammation. These potential biomarkers of sEVs from chronic lung disease have great value in defense against emerging health problems; however, limitations in sample extraction and analysis are obstacles that hinder clinical enhanced applicability. This review focuses on sEV-derived biomarkers in lung cancer and COPD for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic monitoring purposes. To make these molecules more useful in real-life therapy and determine their signature's role, further investigation with a high-scale study is necessary.

Amivantamab Plus Lazertinib in Patients With EGFR-Mutant NSCLC After Progression on Osimertinib and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: Results From CHRYSALIS-2 Cohort A

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with disease progression on or after osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy are limited.

METHODS

CHRYSALIS-2 cohort A evaluated amivantamab plus lazertinib in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion- or L858R-mutated NSCLC with disease progression on or after osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. Primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). The patients received 1050 mg of intravenous amivantamab (1400 mg if ≥ 80 kg) plus 240 mg of oral lazertinib.

RESULTS

In cohort A (N = 162), the investigator-assessed ORR was 28% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22-36). The blinded independent central review-assessed ORR was 35% (95% CI: 27-42), with a median duration of response of 8.3 months (95% CI: 6.7-10.9) and a clinical benefit rate of 58% (95% CI: 50-66). At a median follow-up of 12 months, 32 of 56 responders (57%) achieved a duration of response of more than or equal to 6 months. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was 4.5 months (95% CI: 4.1-5.8); median overall survival was 14.8 months (95% CI: 12.2-18.0). Preliminary evidence of central nervous system antitumor activity was reported in seven patients with baseline brain lesions and no previous brain radiation or surgery. Exploratory biomarker analyses using next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA revealed responses in patients with and without EGFR- or MET-dependent resistance. The most frequent adverse events were rash (grouped term; 81%), infusion-related reaction (68%), and paronychia (52%). The most common grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related adverse events were rash (grouped term; 10%), infusion-related reaction (9%), and hypoalbuminemia (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with limited treatment options, amivantamab plus lazertinib demonstrated an antitumor activity with a safety profile characterized by EGFR- or MET-related adverse events, which were generally manageable.

Datopotamab Deruxtecan in Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Actionable Genomic Alterations: Results From the Phase II TROPION-Lung05 Study

PURPOSE

Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is a trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate with a highly potent topoisomerase I inhibitor payload. The TROPION-Lung05 phase II trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04484142) evaluated the safety and clinical activity of Dato-DXd in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with actionable genomic alterations progressing on or after targeted therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received Dato-DXd 6 mg/kg once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), safety, tolerability, and survival.

RESULTS

Among 137 patients who received at least 1 dose of Dato-DXd, 71.5% received at least three lines of prior therapies for advanced/metastatic disease. Overall, 56.9% had EGFR mutations and 24.8% had ALK rearrangements. Median treatment duration was 4.4 months (range, 0.7-20.6). The confirmed ORR was 35.8% (95% CI, 27.8 to 44.4) overall, and 43.6% (95% CI, 32.4 to 55.3) and 23.5% (95% CI, 10.7 to 41.2) in those with EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements, respectively. The median DOR was 7.0 months (95% CI, 4.2 to 9.8), and the overall disease control rate was 78.8% (95% CI, 71.0 to 85.3). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 28.5% of patients. The most common TRAE was stomatitis (preferred term; any grade: 56.2%; grade ≥3: 9.5%). Five (3.6%) patients experienced adjudicated treatment-related interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, with 1 (0.7%) grade 5 event.

CONCLUSION

Encouraging and durable antitumor activity was observed with Dato-DXd in this heavily pretreated advanced/metastatic NSCLC population with actionable genomic alterations. The rate of treatment-related grade ≥3 toxicities was comparable with previous observations, and no new safety signals were observed.

Real-world comparative outcomes of EGFR-TKIs for first-line treatment of EGFR+ metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI and preferred first-line (1L) treatment for EGFR positive (EGFR+) metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). This study compared real-world clinical outcomes of 1L osimertinib versus 1st or 2nd generation EGFR-TKIs (1/2G-TKIs) in patients with EGFR+ mNSCLC.

METHODS

Nine academic cancer centers in the US participated in the retrospective cohort study. Patients aged ≥18 years with EGFR+ mNSCLC and treated with 1L EGFR-TKI were included. Clinical outcomes included real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), duration of treatment (DOT), time to next treatment (TTNT), central nervous system incidence-free survival (CNS-IFS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable regression models were used to control for differences in patient characteristics (p < 0.1) between the osimertinib and 1/2G-TKI cohorts.

RESULTS

The study included 181 osimertinib patients and 171 1/2G-TKI patients. Osimertinib had a longer rwPFS compared to 1/2G-TKIs (median PFS, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 16.2 months (13.2-19.7) vs. 10.8 months (9.5-12.7); hazard Ratio [HR], 95 % CI: 0.60 (0.44-0.82). DOT and TTNT were significantly longer in patients treated with osimertinib versus 1/2G-TKI (HR, 95 % CI: 0.51 (0.38-0.68) for DOT; 0.54 (0.39-0.74) for TTNT). The respective HR point estimate for CNF-IFS and OS of 0.62 and 0.83 preferred osimertinib. However, small patient counts and number of events posed challenges in drawing conclusion regarding the significance of the delayed CNS-IFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with osimertinib had a prolonged time to progression and longer time maintain the treatment compared to 1/2G-TKI. This real-world evidence is aligned with clinical trial results.

Emerging molecular testing paradigms in non-small cell lung cancer management-current perspectives and recommendations

Advances in molecular testing and precision oncology have transformed the clinical management of lung cancer, especially non-small cell lung cancer, enhancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Practical guidelines offer insights into selecting appropriate biomarkers and assays, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive testing. However, real-world data reveal the underutilization of biomarker testing and consequently targeted therapies. Molecular testing often occurs late in diagnosis or not at all in clinical practice, leading to delayed or inadequate treatment. Enhancing precision requires adherence to best practices by all health care professionals involved, which can ultimately improve lung cancer patient outcomes. The future of precision oncology for lung cancer will likely involve a more personalized approach, starting increasingly from earlier disease settings, with novel and more complex targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and combination regimens, and relying on liquid biopsies, muti-detection advanced genomic technologies and data integration, with artificial intelligence as a central orchestrator. This review presents the currently known actionable mutations in lung cancer and new upcoming ones that are likely to enter clinical practice soon and provides an overview of established and emerging concepts in testing methodologies. Challenges are discussed and best practice recommendations are made that are relevant today, will continue to be relevant in the future, and are likely to be relevant for other cancer types too.

[Molecular characterization of lung cancers: up-date and recommendations]

Molecular testing of non-small cell lung cancers has become mandatory at all stages of the disease. National and international recommendations for molecular testing are up-dated regularly. In this review, we will summarize diagnostic approaches focusing on targetable oncogenic alterations (mutations, gene rearrangements) and we will indicate the limits currently associated with sample types and sequencing technologies. Biomarkers that have not showed routine clinical utility will not be presented here.

Lung Cancer-Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Molecular Aspect (Review of Literature)

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignant cancers in most countries and is the leading cause of death among cancer diseases worldwide. Despite constant progress in diagnosis and therapy, survival rates of patients diagnosed with lung cancer remain unsatisfactory. Numerous epidemiological and experimental studies conducted as early as the 1970s confirm that the most important risk factor for the development of lung cancer is long-term smoking, which remains valid to this day. In the paper, the authors present the latest data on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment and molecular aspects of this cancer. In the last decade, many molecular alterations that are effective in the development of lung cancer have been discovered. In adenocarcinoma, tyrosine kinase inhibitors were developed for EGFR mutations and ALK and ROS1 translocations and were approved for use in the treatment of advanced stage adenocarcinomas. In the case of squamous cell carcinoma, the evaluation of these mutations is not yet being used in clinical practice. In addition, there are ongoing studies concerning many potential therapeutic molecular targets, such as ROS, MET, FGFR, DDR-2 and RET. Constant progress in diagnostic and therapeutic methods gives rise to hopes for an improved prognosis in patients with lung cancer.

Itraconazole Reversing Acquired Resistance to Osimertinib in NSCLC by Inhibiting the SHH/DUSP13B/p-STAT3 Axis

There is an urgent necessity to devise efficient tactics to tackle the inevitable development of resistance to osimertinib, which is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor used in treating EGFR-mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study demonstrates that combining itraconazole with osimertinib synergistically reduces the proliferation and migration, enhances the apoptosis of osimertinib-resistant cells, and effectively inhibits the growth of osimertinib-resistant tumors. Mechanistically, itraconazole combined with osimertinib promotes the proteasomal degradation of sonic hedgehog (SHH), resulting in inactivation of the SHH/Dual-specificity phosphatase 13B (DUSP13B)/p-STAT3 and Hedgehog pathways, suppressing Myc proto-oncogene protein (c-Myc). Additionally, DUSP13B interacts with signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and modulates its phosphorylation. Interestingly, it is observed that SHH overexpression partially rescues the synergistic effects of this combination treatment strategy through the SHH/DUSP13B/p-STAT3 signaling axis. Moreover, it is found that SHH, (GLI1), p-STAT3, and DUSP13B play significant predictive roles in osimertinib resistance. In lung adenocarcinoma, p-STAT3 is positively correlated with SHH but negatively correlated with DUSP13B. Together, these results highlight the crucial role of itraconazole in reversing the acquired resistance to osimertinib and provide a scientific rationale for the therapeutic strategy of combining osimertinib with itraconazole.

Shenqi Fuzheng injection restores the sensitivity to gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer by inhibiting the IL-22/STAT3/AKT pathway

CONTEXT

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. Gefitinib is a first-line treatment for NSCLC. However, its effectiveness is hindered by the development of drug resistance. At present, Shenqi Fuzheng injection (SFI) is widely accepted as an adjuvant therapy in NSCLC.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the molecular mechanism of SFI when combined with gefitinib in regulating cell progression among EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We established gefitinib-resistant PC9-GR cells by exposing gefitinib escalation from 10 nM with the indicated concentrations of SFI in PC9 cells (1, 4, and 8 mg/mL). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to assess gene expression. PC9/GR and H1975 cells were treated with 50 ng/mL of interleukin (IL)-22 alone or in combination with 10 mg/mL of SFI. STAT3, p-STAT3, AKT, and p-AKT expression were evaluated using Western blot. The effects on cell proliferation, clonogenicity, and apoptosis in NSCLC cells were assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), colony formation and flow cytometry assays.

RESULTS

SFI treatment alleviated the development of gefitinib resistance in NSCLC. PC9/GR and H1975 cells treated with SFI significantly exhibited a reduction in IL-22 protein and mRNA overexpression levels. SFI effectively counteracted the activation of the STAT3/AKT signaling pathway induced by adding exogenous IL-22 to PC9/GR and H1975 cells. Moreover, IL-22 combined with gefitinib markedly increased cell viability while reducing apoptosis. In contrast, combining SFI with gefitinib and the concurrent treatment of SFI with gefitinib and IL-22 demonstrated the opposite effect.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

SFI can be a valuable therapeutic option to address gefitinib resistance in NSCLC by suppressing the IL-22/STAT3/AKT pathway.

Design and evaluation of sulfadiazine derivatives as potent dual inhibitors of EGFRWT and EGFRT790M: integrating biological, molecular docking, and ADMET analysis

A series of derivatives (5-14) were synthesized through the diazotization of sulfadiazine with active methylene compounds. The chemical structures of these newly designed compounds were validated through spectral and elemental analysis techniques. The antiproliferative potential of derivatives 5-14 was assessed against three distinct cancer cell lines (A431, A549, and H1975) using the MTT assay. The results revealed that compounds 8, 12, and 14 exhibited the most potent antiproliferative activity, with IC50 values ranging from 2.31 to 7.56 μM. Notably, these values were significantly lower than those of known EGFR inhibitors, including erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib, suggesting the potential of these derivatives as novel antiproliferative agents. Furthermore, compound 12 was identified as the most potent inhibitor of both EGFRWT and EGFRT790M protein kinases, with IC50 values of 14.5 and 35.4 nM, respectively. These results outperformed those of gefitinib and osimertinib, which exhibited IC50 values of 18.2 and 368.2 nM, and 57.8 and 8.5 nM, respectively. Molecular docking studies of compounds 8, 12, and 14 within the ATP-binding sites of both EGFRWT and EGFRT790M corroborated the in vitro results when compared to erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib. The docking results indicated that compound 8 exhibited a favorable binding affinity for both EGFRWT and EGFRT790M, with binding scores of -6.40 kcal mol-1 and -7.53 kcal mol-1, respectively, which were comparable to those of gefitinib and osimertinib, with binding scores of -8.01 and -8.72 kcal mol-1, respectively. Furthermore, an assessment of the most promising EGFR inhibitors (8, 12, and 14) using the egg-boiled method for their in silico ADME properties revealed significant lipophilicity, blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration, and gastrointestinal (GIT) absorption. Collectively, our designed analogs, particularly compounds 8, 12, and 14, exhibit promising dual antiproliferative and EGFRWT and EGFRT790M kinase inhibitory properties, positioning them as efficient candidates for further therapeutic development.

Real-world outcomes of atypical EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC)treated with osimertinib (osi) vs. Afatinib or erlotinib

OBJECTIVES

Limited data are available comparing the efficacy of osi versus earlier generation TKIs for mNSCLC with atypical EGFR mutations (AMs) such as L861Q, G719X, S768I and exon20.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with EGFR-mutated mNSCLC treated from 2007 to 2023 with 1L TKIs, comparing outcomes for AM patients treated with osi, afatinib, and erlotinib. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, treatment history, toxicity, and clinical outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record and compared between TKIs using independent sample t-tests and chi-square analyses. Median progression free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were compared via Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis and Cox multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Among 355 patients with EGFR-mutated mNSCLC, 36 (10 %) harbored AMs in G719X (N=21; 6 %), Exon 20 (N=11; 3 %), L861Q (N=7; 2 %), S768I (N=4; 1 %), C797S (N=1; 0.3 %); 6 patients had compound mutations. Patients with classical mutations (CMs) vs AMs had similar baseline demographic and disease characteristics and usage of TKIs (p = 0.124). Among AM patients, osi yielded superior mPFS (22 m) vs afatinib (12 m; p = 0.005) or erlotinib (9 m; p = 0.001). mOS was likewise superior for osi (32 m) vs afatinib (21 m; p = 0.032) or erlotinib (17 m; p = 0.011). Dose-reduction rates due to AEs were lower for osi (19 %) vs afatinib (24 %; p = 0.003) or erlotinib (23 %; p = 0.002). Discontinuation rates due to AEs were lower for osi vs afatinib (1 % vs 2 %; p < 0.001) or erlotinib (2 %; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large real-world analysis, osi demonstrated superior progression-free and overall survival and improved tolerability compared to afatinib or erlotinib for atypical EGFR-mutated mNSCLC.

A case of response to combination treatment with TSA-DC-CTL immunotherapy and osimertinib in EGFR mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study details a case of a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring an exon 19 deletion in the EGFR gene.

METHOD

A 46-year-old female patient was diagnosed with stage IVb left lung adenocarcinoma, with multiple bone and lymph node metastases. Following the identification of tumor-specific antigen peptides, the patient received a combination treatment of immunotherapy (TSA-DC-CTL) and oral osimertinib. Peripheral blood circulating immune cells and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were monitored before and after treatment. PET-CT and CT scans were used to assess the tumor response to treatment.

RESULTS

A significant increase in total lymphocyte percentage and decrease in the number of CTCs in the patient was observed. Imaging studies showed a notable reduction in tumor metastases.

CONCLUSION

This report demonstrates the safety and efficacy of TSA-DC-CTL cell immunotherapy combined with osimertinib in the treatment of a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR exon 19 deletions. This study describes a promising new treatment option for patients with advanced lung cancer with EGFR mutations.

Osimertinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Overall Survival, Post-progression Management and Budget Impact Analysis in Real-World

INTRODUCTION

The observational multicenter prospective FLOWER study (NCT04965701) confirmed effectiveness and safety of osimertinib in the real-world (RW) management of untreated EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Herein, we report updated survival data, post-progression management, cost/effectiveness and budget impact (BI) of osimertinib compared with a RW population receiving gefitinib or erlotinib.

RESULTS

Overall, 189 Caucasian patients receiving first-line osimertinib were included. After a follow-up of 20.7 months, 74(39.2%) patients discontinued osimertinib, median time-to-treatment discontinuation (mTTD) was 27.9 months, overall survival 36.8 months. At progression, tissue biopsy was performed in 29 (56.9%), liquid biopsy in 15 (29.4%) and both in 7 (13.7%) cases. The most frequent resistant mechanism was MET amplification (N = 14, 29.8%). At data cutoff, 13 (6.9%) patients were continuing osimertinib beyond progression; 52 (67.5%) received second-line treatment; no further treatments were administered in 25 (32.5%) cases. Thirty-three (63.4%) patients received chemotherapy, 12(23.1%) TKIs combination. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed a total cost per patient based on RW mTTD of 98,957.34€, 21,726.28€ and 19,637.83€ for osimertinib, erlotinib and gefitinib, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)/month for osimertinib was 359,806.0€/life-year-gained (LYG) and 197,789.77€/LYG compared to erlotinib and gefitinib. For osimertinib, the BI-gap between RW-TTD and theoretical-TTD was 16,501.0€ per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated analysis confirms the effectiveness of osimertinib in RW. Although the ICER of osimertinib seems not cost-effective, additional costs for the management of disease progression to old generation TKIs were not considered in this study. The BI-gap suggests RW mTTD as a more reliable measure for expense estimation.

Osimertinib in combination with anti-angiogenesis therapy presents a promising option for osimertinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib has become standard care for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whereas drug resistance remains inevitable. Now we recognize that the interactions between the tumor and the tumor microenvironment (TME) also account for drug resistance. Therefore, we provide a new sight into post-osimertinib management, focusing on the alteration of TME.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on the prognosis of different treatments after osimertinib resistance. Next, we carried out in vivo experiment to validate our findings using a humanized mouse model. Furthermore, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing (scRNA-seq) of tumor tissue from the above treatment groups to explore the mechanisms of TME changes.

RESULTS

Totally 111 advanced NSCLC patients have been enrolled in the retrospective study. The median PFS was 9.84 months (95% CI 7.0-12.6 months) in the osimertinib plus anti-angiogenesis group, significantly longer than chemotherapy (P = 0.012) and osimertinib (P = 0.003). The median OS was 16.79 months (95% CI 14.97-18.61 months) in the osimertinib plus anti-angiogenesis group, significantly better than chemotherapy (P = 0.026), the chemotherapy plus osimertinib (P = 0.021), and the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (P = 0.006). The efficacy of osimertinib plus anlotinib in the osimertinib-resistant engraft tumors (R-O+A) group was significantly more potent than the osimertinib (R-O) group (P<0.05) in vitro. The combinational therapy could significantly increase the infiltration of CD4+ T cells (P<0.05), CD25+CD4+ T cells (P<0.001), and PD-1+CD8+ T cells (P<0.05) compared to osimertinib. ScRNA-seq demonstrated that the number of CD8+ T and proliferation T cells increased, and TAM.mo was downregulated in the R-O+A group compared to the R-O group. Subtype study of T cells explained that the changes caused by combination treatment were mainly related to cytotoxic T cells. Subtype study of macrophages showed that proportion and functional changes in IL-1β.mo and CCL18.mo might be responsible for rescue osimertinib resistance by combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, osimertinib plus anlotinib could improve the prognosis of patients with a progressed disease on second-line osimertinib treatment, which may ascribe to increased T cell infiltration and TAM remodeling via VEGF-VEGFR blockage.

Comprehensive analysis of lung adenocarcinoma: Unveiling differential gene expression, survival-linked genes, subtype stratification, and immune landscape implications

This study offers a detailed exploration of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), addressing its heterogeneity and treatment challenges through a multi-faceted analysis that includes gene expression, genetic subtyping, pathway analysis, immune assessment, and drug sensitivity. It identifies 165 genes with significant expression differences and 46 genes associated with survival, revealing insights into oxidative stress and autophagy. LUAD samples were divided into three subtypes using consensus clustering on these 46 genes, with distinct survival outcomes. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) on HALLMARK gene sets indicated pathway variations with survival implications. The immune landscape, analyzed using the CIBERSORT algorithm, showed different immune cell distributions across subtypes, with the first subtype exhibiting a better immune environment and survival prospects. Advanced machine learning techniques developed a risk model from a set of four genes, effectively categorizing patients into high and low-risk groups, validated through external datasets and analyses. This model linked lower risk scores to better clinical stages, with a higher mutation rate and potential immunotherapy benefits observed in the high-risk group. Drug sensitivity assessments highlighted varied treatment responses between risk groups, suggesting avenues for personalized therapy. This comprehensive analysis enhances the understanding of LUAD's molecular and clinical nuances, offering valuable insights for tailored treatment approaches.

Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Disease Progression on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Final Results of CheckMate 722

PURPOSE

The phase III CheckMate 722 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02864251) evaluated nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after disease progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

Patients with disease progression after first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy (without EGFR T790M mutation) or osimertinib (with/without T790M mutation) were randomly assigned 1:1 to nivolumab (360 mg once every 3 weeks) plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy (once every 3 weeks) or platinum-doublet chemotherapy alone (once every 3 weeks) for four cycles. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included 9- and 12-month PFS rates, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR).

RESULTS

Overall, 294 patients were randomly assigned. At final analysis (median follow-up, 38.1 months), PFS was not significantly improved with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy (median, 5.6 v 5.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.00]; P = .0528), with 9- and 12-month PFS rates of 25.9% versus 19.8%, and 21.2% versus 15.9%, respectively. Post hoc PFS subgroup analyses showed a trend favoring nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]), one line of previous EGFR TKI (0.72 [95% CI, 0.54 to 0.97]), or both (0.64 [95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88]). Median OS was 19.4 months with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 15.9 months with chemotherapy, while ORR was 31.3% versus 26.7%, and median DOR was 6.7 versus 5.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 44.7% and 29.4% of patients treated with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab plus chemotherapy did not significantly improve PFS versus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC previously treated with EGFR TKIs. No new safety signals were identified.

The study of primary and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib to improve the outcome of EGFR-mutated advanced Non-small cell lung cancer patients: the challenge is open for new therapeutic strategies

The development of targeted therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has radically changed their clinical perspectives. Current first-line standard treatment for advanced disease is commonly considered third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), osimertinib. The study of primary and acquired resistance to front-line osimertinib is one of the main burning issues to further improve patients' outcome. Great heterogeneity has been depicted in terms of duration of clinical benefit and pattern of progression and this might be related to molecular factors including subtypes of EGFR mutations and concomitant genetic alterations. Acquired resistance can be categorized into two main classes: EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent mechanisms and specific pattern of progression to first-line osimertinib have been demonstrated. The purpose of the manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature about molecular resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib, from a clinical perspective and therefore in relationship to emerging therapeutic approaches.

Tenovin 3 induces apoptosis and ferroptosis in EGFR 19del non small cell lung cancer cells

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion is a major driver for the drug resistance of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Identification small inhibitor capable of selectively inhibiting EGFR-19del NSCLC is a desirable strategy to overcome drug resistance in NSCLC. This study aims to screen an inhibitor for EGFR exon 19 deletion cells and explore its underlying mechanism. High through-put screen was conducted to identify an inhibitor for EGFR-19del NSCLC cells. And tenovin-3 was identified as a selective inhibitor of PC9 cells, an EGFR-19del NSCLC cells. Tenovin-3 showed particular inhibition effect on PC9 cells proliferation through inducing apoptosis and ferroptosis. Mechanistically, tenovin-3 might induce the apoptosis and ferroptosis of PC9 cells through mitochondrial pathway, as indicated by the change of VDAC1 and cytochrome c (cyt c). And bioinformatics analyses showed that the expression levels of SLC7A11 and CPX4 were correlated with NSCLC patient's survival. Our findings provide evidences for tenovin-3 to be developed into a novel candidate agent for NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion. Our study also suggests that inducing ferroptosis may be a therapeutic strategy for NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion.

Clinical characteristics and MRI based radiomics nomograms can predict iPFS and short-term efficacy of third-generation EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastases

BACKGROUND

Predicting short-term efficacy and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) in epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutated (EGFR-mutated) lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases who receive third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy was of great significance for individualized treatment. We aimed to construct and validate nomograms based on clinical characteristics and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics for predicting short-term efficacy and intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) of third-generation EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-four EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases who received third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment were included in this study from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2023. Patients were randomly divided into training cohort and validation cohort in a ratio of 5:3. Radiomics features extracted from brain MRI were screened by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to screen clinical risk factors. Single clinical (C), single radiomics (R), and combined (C + R) nomograms were constructed in short-term efficacy predicting model and iPFS predicting model, respectively. Prediction effectiveness of nomograms were evaluated by calibration curves, Harrell's concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the iPFS of high and low iPFS rad-score patients in the predictive iPFS R model and to compare the iPFS of high-risk and low-risk patients in the predictive iPFS C + R model.

RESULTS

Overall response rate (ORR) was 71.1%, disease control rate (DCR) was 91.8% and median iPFS was 12.67 months (7.88-20.26, interquartile range [IQR]). There were significant differences in iPFS between patients with high and low iPFS rad-scores, as well as between high-risk and low-risk patients. In short-term efficacy model, the C-indexes of C + R nomograms in training cohort and validation cohort were 0.867 (0.835-0.900, 95%CI) and 0.803 (0.753-0.854, 95%CI), while in iPFS model, the C-indexes were 0.901 (0.874-0.929, 95%CI) and 0.753 (0.713-0.793, 95%CI).

CONCLUSIONS

The third-generation EGFR-TKI showed significant efficacy in EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases, and the combined line plot of C + R can be utilized to predict short-term efficacy and iPFS.

Targeting the EGFR/RAS/RAF signaling pathway in anticancer research: a recent update on inhibitor design and clinical trials (2020-2023)

INTRODUCTION

Recent years have seen significant strides in drug developmenttargeting the EGFR/RAS/RAF signaling pathway which is critical forcell growth and proliferation. Protein-protein interaction networksamong EGFR, RAS, and RAF proteins offer insights for drug discovery. This review discusses the drug design and development efforts ofinhibitors targeting these proteins over the past 3 years, detailingtheir structures, selectivity, efficacy, and combination therapy.Strategies to combat drug resistance and minimize toxicities areexplored, along with future research directions.

AREA COVERED

This review encompasses clinical trials and patents on EGFR, KRAS,and BRAF inhibitors from 2020 to 2023, including advancements indesign and synthesis of proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) forprotein degradation.

EXPERT OPINION

To tackle drug resistance, designing allosteric fourth-generationEGFR inhibitors is vital. Covalent, allosteric, or combinationaltherapies, along with PROTAC degraders, are key methods to addressresistance and toxicity in KRAS and BRAF inhibitors.

Ablation for Single Pulmonary Nodules, Primary or Metastatic. Εndobronchial Ablation Systems or Percutaneous

Single pulmonary nodules are a difficult to diagnose imagining artifact. Currently novel diagnostic tools such as Radial-EBUS with or not C-ARM flouroscopy, electromagnetic navigation systems, robotic bronchoscopy and cone beam-compuer tomography (CBCT) can assist in the optimal guidance of biopsy equipment. After diagnosis of lung cancer or metastatic disease as pulmonary nodule, then surgery or ablation methods as local treatment can be applied. The percutaneous ablation systems under computed tomography guidance with radiofrequency, microwave, cryo and thermosphere have been used for several years. In the past 10 years extensive research has been made for endobronchial ablation systems and methods. We will present and comment on the two different ablation methods and present up to date data.

Real-World Data About Treatment Outcomes for Patients with EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Resistance to Osimertinib and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Docetaxel is an established standard therapy after osimertinib and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (Pt-doublet) for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutation. To facilitate future therapeutic developments in these patients after treatment with osimertinib and Pt-doublet, we estimated the outcomes of currently used post-treatment therapies.

METHODS

Data of patients with NSCLC who received at least one medication after osimertinib and Pt-doublet between April 2008 and August 2021 were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database. The duration of treatment (DoT) (first treatment after osimertinib and Pt-doublet) and overall survival (OS) were estimated. The index date was the first day on which the medication was prescribed.

RESULTS

In total, 731 patients (mean age 64 years) were screened. The most frequent post-treatments were docetaxel-based chemotherapy (30.2%), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) alone or in combination (17.2%), first-/second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (16.7%), osimertinib (16.3%), and Pt-doublet (5.2%). The median DoT and OS (95% confidence interval) of all post-treatments were 3.5 (3.27, 3.77) and 10.3 (9.3, 12.1) months, respectively, reflecting the median DoT (3.8 months) and OS (10.0 months) of docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Among all post-treatment regimens, ICIs resulted numerically the shortest [2.77 (2.33, 3.00) months] and osimertinib the longest [4.40 (3.47, 5.67) months] median DoT. The median OS was shortest in patients post-treated with ICIs [7.07 (5.40, 9.90) months] and longest in patients rechallenged with Pt-doublet (12.27 months), followed by patients post-treated with osimertinib (11.70 months). In a subset analysis of patients who received first-line osimertinib and second-line Pt-doublet as well as Pt-doublet immediately after osimertinib, those post-treated with ICIs had the shortest median DoT.

CONCLUSION

Given the limited real-world efficacy on EGFR-mutant NSCLC resistant to osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy, the development of more highly potent post-treatment therapies is warranted.

Immunotherapy for the elderly. Maybe the best option for lung cancer?

Lung cancer is usually diagnosed at advanced stage and systematic therapy is administered. New current diagnostic techniques such as the convex-endobronchial ultrasound, radial endobronchial ultrasound, cone beam ct, electromagnetic navigation and robotic bronchoscopy provide us with a high diagnostic yield. These techniques are minimal invasive and patients with comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure can be diagnosed with minimal adverse effects. All these techniques provide sufficient sample for molecular investigation. Since immunotherapy was first administered, we have more and more information regarding the appropriate patient target group. Several published studies divided patients as elderly ≥75 and non-elderly ≤74 and investigated the adverse effects of different drugs and survival. In our current commentary we present information on patients receiving immunotherapy versus chemoimmunotherapy in two groups of elderly and non-elderly. Elderly patients can receive both combinations without differences between the two groups, however; more studies are needed to clarify certain aspects.

Sotorasib after immune checkpoint inhibitor administration induces hepatotoxicity. True, false or just another adverse effect of NSCLC treatment

Non-small cell lung cancer is still diagnosed at a late disease stage and systematic therapy is necessary. Currently we have three main treatment modalities; chemotherapy, targeted with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune check point inhibitors. In the recent years and based on new studies we can administer combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, or radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Every treatment approach is based on the specific gene expression of the tumor. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used for more than a decade for epidermal growth factor positive tumors, the same for anaplastic lymphoma kinase and proto-oncogene 1. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression has been found to be associated with the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors. However; there are still several subpopulations in non-small cell lung cancer patients. We will comment on the group with KRAS G12C mutation and the targeted therapy with sotorasib for its efficiency and toxicity based on new studies.

Real-World Data on Combined EGFR-TKI and Crizotinib Treatment for Acquired and De Novo MET Amplification in Patients with Metastatic EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

Amplification of the mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) gene is a mechanism of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (TKIs) in over 20% of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated (EGFRm+) non-small lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it may also occur de novo in 2-8% of EGFRm+ NSCLC cases as a potential mechanism of intrinsic resistance. These patients represent a group with unmet needs, since there is no standard therapy currently approved. Several new MET inhibitors are being investigated in clinical trials, but the results are awaited. Meanwhile, as an alternative strategy, combinations of EGFR-TKIs with the MET/ALK/ROS1-TKI Crizotinib may be used in this setting, despite this use is principally off-label. Thus, we studied five of these MET amplified cases receiving EGFR-TKI and Crizotinib doublet after progression on EGFR-TKI treatment to assess the benefits and challenges related to this combination and the possible occurrence of genomic and phenotypic co-alterations. Furthermore, we compared our cases with other real-world reports on Crizotinib/EGFR-TKI combinations, which appeared effective, especially in patients with high-level MET amplification. Yet, we observed that the co-occurrence of other genomic and phenotypical alterations may affect the response to combined EGFR-TKI and Crizotinib. Finally, given the heterogeneity of MET amplification, the diagnostic methods for assessing it may be discrepant. In this respect, we observed that for optimal detection, immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and next-generation sequencing should be used together, as these methods possess different sensitivities and complement each other in characterizing MET amplification. Additionally, we addressed the issue of managing EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with de novo MET amplification causing primary EGFR-TKI resistance. We conclude that, while data from clinical trials with new MET inhibitors are still pending, adding Crizotinib to EGFR-TKI in NSCLC patients acquiring MET amplification at progression on EGFR-TKI monotherapy is a reasonable approach, with a progression-free survival of 3-19 months.

Mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes promote tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

Acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as osimertinib used to treat EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas, limits long-term efficacy and is frequently caused by non-genetic mechanisms. Here, we define the chromatin accessibility and gene regulatory signatures of osimertinib sensitive and resistant EGFR-mutant cell and patient-derived models and uncover a role for mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes in TKI resistance. By profiling mSWI/SNF genome-wide localization, we identify both shared and cancer cell line-specific gene targets underlying the resistant state. Importantly, genetic and pharmacologic disruption of the SMARCA4/SMARCA2 mSWI/SNF ATPases re-sensitizes a subset of resistant models to osimertinib via inhibition of mSWI/SNF-mediated regulation of cellular programs governing cell proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, epithelial cell differentiation, and NRF2 signaling. These data highlight the role of mSWI/SNF complexes in supporting TKI resistance and suggest potential utility of mSWI/SNF inhibitors in TKI-resistant lung cancers.

Changes in the Histology of Lung Cancer in Northern Italy: Impact on Incidence and Mortality

This study assessed the incidence, mortality, and survival of lung cancer subtypes of NSCSLC (non-small-cell lung cancer), SCLC (small-cell lung cancer), and other morphologies. It is an observational epidemiological study using 7197 cases from the Reggio Emilia Cancer Registry recorded between 2001 and 2020 in males and females. The incidence of NSCLC in 5104 males indicates a significant 3% annual increase until 2013 and then a decline of -3.2% that is not statistically significant; until 2014, mortality increased significantly (3.2%), but it then decreased non-significantly (-12.1%), especially squamous cell cancer. In 2093 females, the incidence and mortality trends continued to rise significantly through 2012, and then they began to slightly decline (not statistically significant). The two-year relative survival of NSCLC increased from 32% to 38% in males and from 42% to 56% in females. SCLC in males decreased significantly both in incidence and mortality, while in women, it showed a slight increase (significantly for incidence but not for mortality). This study is important because it analyzes the decrease in lung cancer in males and the increase in females in relation to the different histotypes. Our study's findings confirmed a decline in male incidence and death beginning in 2013. We were unable to determine if the drop in cigarette smoking and the introduction of new drugs such as EGFR in first-line therapy were responsible for the lower incidence.

Understanding and targeting resistance mechanisms in cancer

Resistance to cancer therapies has been a commonly observed phenomenon in clinical practice, which is one of the major causes of treatment failure and poor patient survival. The reduced responsiveness of cancer cells is a multifaceted phenomenon that can arise from genetic, epigenetic, and microenvironmental factors. Various mechanisms have been discovered and extensively studied, including drug inactivation, reduced intracellular drug accumulation by reduced uptake or increased efflux, drug target alteration, activation of compensatory pathways for cell survival, regulation of DNA repair and cell death, tumor plasticity, and the regulation from tumor microenvironments (TMEs). To overcome cancer resistance, a variety of strategies have been proposed, which are designed to enhance the effectiveness of cancer treatment or reduce drug resistance. These include identifying biomarkers that can predict drug response and resistance, identifying new targets, developing new targeted drugs, combination therapies targeting multiple signaling pathways, and modulating the TME. The present article focuses on the different mechanisms of drug resistance in cancer and the corresponding tackling approaches with recent updates. Perspectives on polytherapy targeting multiple resistance mechanisms, novel nanoparticle delivery systems, and advanced drug design tools for overcoming resistance are also reviewed.

YAP1 synergize with YY1 transcriptional co-repress DUSP1 to induce osimertinib resistant by activating the EGFR/MAPK pathway and abrogating autophagy in non-small cell lung cancer

YAP1 is a well-known core effector of the Hippo pathway in tumors, but its potential role in osimertinib resistance remained unexplored. Our study provides evidence that YAP1 acts as a potent promoter of osimertinib resistance. By inhibiting YAP1 with a novel inhibitor, CA3, and combining it with osimertinib, we observed a significant suppression of cell proliferation and metastasis, induction of apoptosis and autophagy, and a delay in the emergence of osimertinib resistance. Interestingly, CA3 combined with osimertinib executed its anti-metastasis and pro-tumor apoptosis in part through autophagy. Mechanistically, we found that YAP1, in collaboration with YY1, transcriptionally represses DUSP1, leading to the dephosphorylation of the EGFR/MEK/ERK pathway and YAP1 phosphorylation in osimertinib-resistant cells. Our results also validate that CA3, in combination with osimertinib, executes its anti-metastasis and pro-tumor apoptosis partly through autophagy and the YAP1/DUSP1/EGFR/MEK/ERK regulatory feedback loop in osimertinib-resistant cells. Remarkably, our findings illustrate that YAP1 protein is upregulated in patients after osimertinib treatment and osimertinib resistance. Overall, our study confirms that the YAP1 inhibitor CA3 increases DUSP1 with concomitant activation of the EGFR/MAPK pathway and induces autophagy to enhance the efficacy of third-generation EGFR-TKI treatments for NSCLC patients.

CKAP4 is a potential exosomal biomarker and therapeutic target for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Globally, lung cancer causes the most cancer death. While molecular therapy progress, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has provided remarkable therapeutic effects, some patients remain resistant to these therapies and therefore new target development is required. Cytoskeleton-associated membrane protein 4 (CKAP4) is a receptor of the secretory protein Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) and the binding of DKK1 to CKAP4 promotes tumor growth via Ak strain transforming (AKT) activation. We investigated if CKAP4 functions as a diagnostic biomarker and molecular therapeutic target for lung cancer.

METHODS

CKAP4 secretion with exosomes from lung cancer cells and the effect of CKAP4 palmitoylation on its trafficking to the exosomes were examined. Serum CKAP4 levels were measured in mouse xenograft models, and 92 lung cancer patients and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). The lung cancer tissues were immunohistochemically stained for DKK1 and CKAP4, and their correlation with prognosis and serum CKAP4 levels were investigated. Roles of CKAP4 in the lung cancer cell proliferation were examined, and the effects of the combination of an anti-CKAP4 antibody and osimertinib, a third generation TKI, on anti-tumor activity were tested using in vitro and in vivo experiments.

RESULTS

CKAP4 was released from lung cancer cells with exosomes, and its trafficking to exosomes was regulated by palmitoylation. CKAP4 was detected in sera from mice inoculated with lung cancer cells overexpressing CKAP4. In 92 lung cancer patients, positive DKK1 and CKAP4 expression patients showed worse prognoses. Serum CKAP4 positivity was higher in lung cancer patients than in HCs. After surgical operation, serum CKAP4 levels were decreased. CKAP4 overexpression in lung cancer cells promoted in vitro cell proliferation and in vivo subcutaneous tumor growth, which were inhibited by an anti-CKAP4 antibody. Moreover, treatment with this antibody or osimertinib, a third generation TKI, inhibited AKT activity, sphere formation, and xenograft tumor growth in lung cancer cells harboring EGFR mutations and expressing both DKK1 and CKAP4, while their combination showed stronger inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

CKAP4 may represent a novel biomarker and molecular target for lung cancer, and combination therapy with an anti-CKAP4 antibody and osimertinib could provide a new lung cancer therapeutic strategy.

HER3-targeted therapeutic antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates in non-small cell lung cancer refractory to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) is a unique member of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER/EGFR) family, since it has negligible kinase activity. Therefore, HER3 must interact with a kinase-proficient receptor to form a heterodimer, leading to the activation of signaling cascades. Overexpression of HER3 is observed in various human cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and correlates with poor clinical outcomes in patients. Studies on the underlying mechanism demonstrate that HER3-initiated signaling promotes tumor metastasis and causes treatment failure in human cancers. Upregulation of HER3 is frequently observed in EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Increased expression of HER3 triggers the so-called EGFR-independent mechanism via interactions with other receptors to activate "bypass signaling pathways", thereby resulting in resistance to EGFR-TKIs. To date, no HER3-targeted therapy has been approved for cancer treatment. In both preclinical and clinical studies, targeting HER3 with a blocking antibody (Ab) is the only strategy being examined. Recent evaluations of an anti-HER3 Ab-drug conjugate (ADC) show promising results in patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC. Herein, we summarize our understanding of the unique biology of HER3 in NSCLC refractory to EGFR-TKIs, with a focus on its dimerization partners and subsequent activation of signaling pathways. We also discuss the latest development of the therapeutic Abs and ADCs targeting HER3 to abrogate EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC.

Radiation Recall Pneumonitis: The Open Challenge in Differential Diagnosis of Pneumonia Induced by Oncological Treatments

The treatment of primary and secondary lung neoplasms now sees the fundamental role of radiotherapy, associated with surgery and systemic therapies. The improvement in survival outcomes has also increased attention to the quality of life, treatment compliance and the management of side effects. The role of imaging is not only limited to recognizing the efficacy of treatment but also to identifying, as soon as possible, the uncommon effects, especially when more treatments, such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy and radiotherapy, are associated. Radiation recall pneumonitis is an uncommon treatment complication that should be correctly characterized, and it is essential to recognize the mechanisms of radiation recall pneumonitis pathogenesis and diagnostic features in order to promptly identify them and adopt the best therapeutic strategy, with the shortest possible withdrawal of the current oncological drug. In this setting, artificial intelligence could have a critical role, although a larger patient data set is required.

Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with RET Fusions: Reality and Hopes

RET-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) selpercatinib and pralsetinib have revolutionized the landscape of RET-positive (RET+) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment, thanks to their efficacy and safety profiles. This class of medications currently represents the standard of care for both naïve and patients that have not received selective RET-TKIs in the first-line setting. However, we presently lack a satisfactory understanding of resistance mechanism developing after selective RET-TKIs usage, as well as a specific treatment for patients progressing on selpercatinib or pralsetinib. Chemotherapy ± immunotherapy is considered as a recommended subsequent second-line regimen in these patients. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to better define and understand the resistance mechanisms triggered by RET-TKIs. With this in mind, the present review article has been conceived to provide a comprehensive overview about RET+ advanced NSCLC, both from a therapeutic and molecular point of view. Besides comparing the clinical outcome achieved in RET+ advanced NSCLC patients after multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) and/or RET-selective TKIs' administration, we focused on the molecular mechanisms accountable for their long-term resistance. Finally, a critical perspective on many of today's most debated issues and concerns is provided, with the purpose of shaping the possible pharmacological approaches for tomorrow's therapies.

Combatting acquired resistance to osimertinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer

The discovery of activating mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in non-small-cell lung cancer transformed the care and prognosis of patients and heralded the era of 'personalized medicine' in thoracic oncology. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR inhibitor, has been established as the preferred EGFR inhibitor for newly diagnosed patients which urged the need to develop treatment options for patients progressing on first-line osimertinib. However, acquired resistance invariably emerges and numerous efforts have been attempted to delay or overcome acquired resistance. In this article, we thoroughly reviewed the current understanding of osimertinib resistance mechanisms and explored the established and emerging treatment options. Newer treatment strategies targeting EGFR-dependent or -independent resistance mechanisms, novel approaches using bispecific antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates will be discussed. Moreover, what to do with brain only progression, and how to incorporate immunotherapy in EGFR-mutant lung cancer will be discussed. Lastly, future perspectives on the ongoing clinical trials and combination of front-line therapy will be introduced.

Thieno[2,3-b]thiophene Derivatives as Potential EGFRWT and EGFRT790M Inhibitors with Antioxidant Activities: Microwave-Assisted Synthesis and Quantitative In Vitro and In Silico Studies

Microwave-assisted synthesis and spectral analysis of certain novel derivatives of 3,4-diaminothieno[2,3-b]thiophene-2,5-dicarbonitrile 1-7 were carried out. Compounds 1-7 were examined for cytotoxicity against MCF-7 and A549 cell lines using the quantitative MTT method, and gefitinib and erlotinib were used as reference standards. Compounds 1-7 were shown to be more active than erlotinib against the two cell lines tested. Compound 2 outperformed regular erlotinib by 4.42- and 4.12-fold in MCF-7 and A549 cells, respectively. The most cytotoxic compounds were subsequently studied for their suppression of kinase activity using the homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence assay versus epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR^WT) and EGFR^790M. With IC₅₀ values of 0.28 ± 0.03 and 5.02 ± 0.19, compound 2 was demonstrated to be the most effective against both forms of EGFR. Furthermore, compound 2 also had the best antioxidant property, decreasing the radical scavenging activity by 78%. Molecular docking research, on the other hand, was carried out for the analyzed candidates (1-7) to study their mechanism of action as EGFR inhibitors. In silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity tests were also performed to explain the physicochemical features of the examined derivatives.

Predictive value of early kinetics of ctDNA combined with cfDNA and serum CEA for EGFR-TKI treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has made a breakthrough as an early biomarker in operable early-stage cancer patients. However, the function of ctDNA combined with cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a predictor in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. Here, we explored its potential as a biomarker for predicting the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was undertaken. Plasma collected from 51 patients with advanced NSCLC prior to and serially after starting treatment with EGFR-TKIs was analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The performance of ctDNA, cfDNA, and combining ctDNA with cfDNA were evaluated for their ability to predict survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients with early undetectable ctDNA and increasing cfDNA had a markedly better progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001) than those with early detectable ctDNA and decreasing cfDNA. Patients with early ctDNA clearance were more likely to have the ctDNA persistent clearance (p = 0.006). The early clearance rate of ctDNA in the normal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) group was significantly higher than in the low and high groups (p = 0.028). Patients with greater CEA decline had a higher early clearance rate of ctDNA than those with minor CEA change (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

We based this study on ctDNA and cfDNA, explored its prognostic predictive ability, and combined CEA to monitor EGFR-TKI efficacy. This study may provide new perspectives and insights into the precise treatment strategies for NSCLC patients.

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: how to manage EGFR and HER2 exon 20 insertion mutation-positive disease

EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (Ex20ins) and HER2 mutations characterize an oncogene-addicted subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) typically associated with a never or light smoking history, female sex, and adenocarcinoma histology. Nevertheless, Ex20ins-mutant and HER2-mutant advanced NSCLCs are still difficult to treat for various reasons. First, there is a need for sophisticated diagnostic tools (e.g. next-generation sequencing) that could allow the identification of these relatively rare molecular drivers. Second, highly active targeted drugs that might support a significant change in patients' prognosis when used as first-line therapy are required. In fact, although a few targeted drugs have so far demonstrated antitumour activity for these patients, mainly selective human epidermal receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as poziotinib and mobocertinib (for both molecular alterations), monoclonal antibodies such as amivantamab (for Ex20ins), and antibody-drug conjugates such as trastuzumab deruxtecan (for HER2 mutants), they are mostly confined for clinical use in pretreated patients. Finally, Ex20ins-targeted or HER2-targeted drugs might be difficult to access in different countries or regions worldwide. In the present review, we provide a concise but comprehensive summary of the challenges that lie ahead as we move towards personalized treatment of Ex20ins-mutant and HER2-mutant advanced NSCLC, also suggesting a treatment algorithm that could be followed for patients with these genetic aberrations.

Determination of Osimertinib, Aumolertinib, and Furmonertinib in Human Plasma for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring by UPLC-MS/MS

The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib represent a new treatment option for patients with EGFR p.Thr790 Met (T790 M)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, there are no studies reporting the simultaneous quantification of these three drugs. A simple ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantitative determination of osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib concentrations in human plasma, and it was applied for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Plasma samples were processed using the protein precipitation method (acetonitrile). A positive ion monitoring mode was used for detecting analytes. D₃-Sorafenib was utilized as the internal standard (IS), and the mobile phases were acetonitrile (containing 0.1% formic acid) and water with gradient elution on an XSelect HSS XP column (2.1 mm × 100.0 mm, 2.5 µm, Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL·min⁻¹. The method’s selectivity, precision (coefficient of variation of intra-day and inter-day ≤ 6.1%), accuracy (95.8–105.2%), matrix effect (92.3–106.0%), extraction recovery, and stability results were acceptable according to the guidelines. The linear ranges were 5–500 ng·mL⁻¹, 2–500 ng·mL⁻¹, and 0.5–200 ng·mL⁻¹ for osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib, respectively. The results show that the method was sensitive, reliable, and simple and that it could be successfully applied to simultaneously determine the osimertinib, aumolertinib, and furmonertinib blood concentrations in patients. These findings support using the method for TDM, potentially reducing the incidence of dosing blindness and adverse effects due to empirical dosing and inter-patient differences.

Cross-Resistance Among Sequential Cancer Therapeutics: An Emerging Issue

Over the past two decades, cancer treatment has benefited from having a significant increase in the number of targeted drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. With the introduction of targeted therapy, a great shift towards a new era has taken place that is characterized by reduced cytotoxicity and improved clinical outcomes compared to traditional chemotherapeutic drugs. At present, targeted therapies and other systemic anti-cancer therapies available (immunotherapy, cytotoxic, endocrine therapies and others) are used alone or in combination in different settings (neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic). As a result, it is not uncommon for patients affected by an advanced malignancy to receive subsequent anti-cancer therapies. In this challenging complexity of cancer treatment, the clinical pathways of real-life patients are often not as direct as predicted by standard guidelines and clinical trials, and cross-resistance among sequential anti-cancer therapies represents an emerging issue. In this review, we summarize the main cross-resistance events described in the diverse tumor types and provide insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in this process. We also discuss the current challenges and provide perspectives for the research and development of strategies to overcome cross-resistance and proceed towards a personalized approach.