The European Medicines Agency review of sacituzumab govitecan for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer

Delphi consensus on the management of adverse events in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with sacituzumab govitecan

BACKGROUND

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (BC; mTNBC) is one of the most aggressive cancers, difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone target receptors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a new therapeutic approach that exploits the combination of an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen expressed in solid epithelial tumors and the active metabolite SN-38, to precisely target cancer cells. The development of consensus recommendations requires synthesizing expert opinions, especially when direct evidence is limited.

METHODS

This study aimed to create a Delphi process to gather the perspectives of a panel of BC and supportive specialists on the use of SG in clinical practice. A scientific board discussed and defined a series of statements that were submitted to the panel through 2 rounds of voting. The process was designed to collect expert opinions to achieve consensus on key points regarding the safety, dosing regimens, and patient management for SG. Each round of the survey included targeted questions informed by current literature. Predefined criteria for consensus were set at ≥75% agreement.

RESULTS

In October 2024, 29 experts' opinions were collected by voting on 40 statements and reaching a 67% agreement. The reduction of the initial SG dose and the management of prophylaxis for patients with the UGT1A1 *28/*28 genotype were the most discussed topics.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide a foundational framework for clinical decision-making, and highlight the importance of collaborative expert synthesis in forming practice guidelines. Future studies should focus on prospective SG trials to address the identified areas of uncertainty.

Pre-treatment [18F]FDG PET/CT biomarkers for the prediction of antibody-drug conjugates efficacy in metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT-derived biomarkers and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd).

METHODS

A retrospective bicentric analysis was conducted on triple-negative mBC (mTNBC) patients treated with SG and HER2-low mBC patients treated with T-DXd, who underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT scans before therapy. Key biomarkers, including maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and maximum tumor dissemination (Dmax), were measured. Their prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox models and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

128 patients were included: 71 mTNBC treated with SG and 57 HR-positive and -negative HER2-low mBC treated with T-DXd. Median follow-up was 12.9 months. In the SG cohort, median PFS and OS were 4.8 and 8.9 months, respectively. High Dmax (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-4.3) and high TMTV (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.2-6.6) were independently associated with shorter OS. In the T-DXd cohort, median PFS and OS were 5.8 and 9.0 months, respectively. High Dmax (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.9) and high TMTV (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.0-6.5) independently correlated with shorter PFS and shorter OS, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment [18F]FDG PET/CT-derived biomarkers, namely TMTV and Dmax, have significant prognostic value in patients with mTNBC and HER2-low mBC treated with SG and T-DXd. These biomarkers improve prognostic prediction and may optimize treatment strategies, warranting their clinical use, but larger studies are needed to validate these findings.

Biomarkers in breast cancer 2024: an updated consensus statement by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology and the Spanish Society of Pathology

This revised consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathological Anatomy (SEAP) updates the recommendations for biomarkers use in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer that we first published in 2018. The expert group recommends determining in early breast cancer the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Ki-67, and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2), as well as BReast CAncer (BRCA) genes in high-risk HER2-negative breast cancer, to assist prognosis and help in indicating the therapeutic options, including hormone therapy, chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, and other targeted therapies. One of the four available genetic prognostic platforms (Oncotype DX®, MammaPrint®, Prosigna®, or EndoPredict®) may be used in ER-positive patients with early breast cancer to establish a prognostic category and help decide with the patient whether adjuvant treatment may be limited to hormonal therapy. In second-line advanced breast cancer, in addition, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) and estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) should be tested in hormone-sensitive cases, BRCA gene mutations in HER2-negative cancers, and in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1). Newer biomarkers and technologies, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing, serine/threonine kinase (AKT) pathway activation, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), are at this point investigational.

Preliminary results from ASCENT-J02: a phase 1/2 study of sacituzumab govitecan in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved outside Japan for second-line and later metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), based on the ASCENT study (NCT02574455). We report SG safety and efficacy in an open-label, phase 1/2 bridging study in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (ASCENT-J02; NCT05101096; jRCT2031210346).

METHODS

Phase 1 was a standard 3 + 3 design. Patients received intravenous SG 6 mg/kg, escalating to 10 mg/kg, on Days 1 and 8 per 21-day cycle; primary endpoints were safety, incidence of dose-limiting toxicity/toxicities (DLTs), and determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). In the multicohort phase 2 study, patients in the mTNBC cohort with previously treated disease received SG at the RP2D; primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Safety was a secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

In phase 1 (N = 15), one DLT (grade 3 elevated transaminases) occurred with SG 10 mg/kg; RP2D was SG 10 mg/kg regardless of UGT1A1 status. In phase 2, 36 patients with mTNBC received SG 10 mg/kg. At median follow-up of 6.1 months, IRC-assessed ORR was 25.0% (95% CI 12.1-42.2; P = 0.0077). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.9-not reached [NR]); median overall survival was NR. No treatment-emergent adverse events led to discontinuation or death.

CONCLUSIONS

SG RP2D was established as 10 mg/kg in Japanese patients. SG showed efficacy in Japanese patients with previously treated mTNBC, a manageable safety profile, and no new safety signals, consistent with the previous ASCENT study.

Sacituzumab Govitecan in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Triple-negative breast cancer is difficult to treat due to the absence of hormone receptors and Her2neu. Sacituzumab govitecan is a new therapeutic approach that uses an antibody directed against the Trop-2 antigen present in solid epithelial tumors, linked to the active metabolite SN-38, similar to irinotecan, to specifically target cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy cells. The objective of the present review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacituzumab govitecan as a single treatment in patients with triple-negative breast cancer and to compare its results with the standard conventional chemotherapy regimen currently used in this disease.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized clinical trials of sacituzumab govitecan was performed. The search was performed in Medline (PubMed), Web of Science, and Cochrane from September 2022 to January 2024.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight articles are included and evaluated according to inclusion and exclusion criteria corresponding to the two most relevant clinical trials, including specific analyses of cohorts and subgroup study arms within these trials. Data from more recent clinical trials are also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy results showed a significantly greater clinical benefit with sacituzumab govitecan compared to standard chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This drug will become a treatment of substantial impact in future treatment guidelines for this type of cancer.

Sacituzumab govitecan for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Initial treatment for hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) typically involves endocrine therapy (ET) combined with different targeted agents. When hormonal therapies fail, until recently, the only option available was chemotherapy (ChT), presenting a significant therapeutic challenge. However, the recent introduction of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has provided new treatment alternatives in this context. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2)-targeting ADC, has been evaluated following disease progression to ET and ChT in HR+/HER2- ABC.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the latest clinical trials, including phase I/II and III studies and evaluates the impact of SG on HR+/HER2- ABC. The literature search focused on clinical outcomes, particularly regarding efficacy and safety, comparing them with traditional ChT.

EXPERT OPINION

SG has demonstrated to be an effective treatment for patients with HR+/HER2- ABC after progression to ET and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDKi) in any setting, and at least two ChT-containing regimens in the advanced setting. With a manageable toxicity profile, SG represents a significant advancement in the treatment landscape for this patient population. However, further research is essential to optimize its application and establish long-term benefits.

Final Results From the Randomized Phase III ASCENT Clinical Trial in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer and Association of Outcomes by Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 and Trophoblast Cell Surface Antigen 2 Expression

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a first-in-class anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) antibody-drug conjugate, demonstrated superior efficacy over single-agent chemotherapy (treatment of physician's choice [TPC]) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in the international, multicenter, phase III ASCENT study.Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive SG or TPC until unacceptable toxicity/progression. Final efficacy secondary end point analyses and post hoc analyses of outcomes stratified by Trop-2 expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status are reported. Updated safety analyses are provided.In this final analysis, SG (n = 267) improved median progression-free survival (PFS; 4.8 v 1.7 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.41 [95% CI, 0.33 to 0.52]) and median overall survival (OS; 11.8 v 6.9 months; HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.63]) over TPC (n = 262). SG improved PFS over TPC in each Trop-2 expression quartile (n = 168); a trend was observed for improved OS across quartiles. Overall, SG had a manageable safety profile, with ≤5% of treatment-related discontinuations because of adverse events and no treatment-related deaths. The safety profile was consistent across all subgroups.These data confirm the clinical benefit of SG over chemotherapy, reinforcing SG as an effective treatment option in patients with mTNBC in the second line or later.

Subgroup analyses from the phase 3 ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

In this post hoc analysis of the ASCENT study, we compared outcomes with sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs single-agent chemotherapy in clinically important subgroups of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Patients with mTNBC refractory to/relapsing after ≥2 prior chemotherapies (≥1 in the metastatic setting) were randomized 1:1 to receive SG or treatment of physician's choice (TPC) until unacceptable toxicity/progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by central review in patients without brain metastases. Patients with brain metastases were allowed if metastases were stable ≥4 weeks. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, 19% of patients were age ≥65 years; 12% were Black, and 12% had brain metastases. SG improved PFS and overall survival (OS), respectively, vs TPC in patients age ≥65 years (7.1 vs 2.4 months and 14.7 vs 8.9 months), or of Black race (5.4 vs 2.2 months and 13.8 vs 8.5 months), consistent with outcomes in the ITT population. Patients with brain metastases had numerically higher median PFS with SG vs TPC, but median OS was similar between treatment groups. SG was well tolerated and had a manageable safety profile consistent with the full safety population across all subgroups; neutropenia and diarrhea were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. These findings confirm the meaningful clinical benefit of SG vs standard chemotherapy in patient subgroups with high unmet needs. SG should be considered an effective and safe treatment option for patients with mTNBC eligible for second-line or later therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT02574455.

Postmarketing Safety of Sacituzumab Govitecan: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

Sacituzumab govitecan is widely used for the treatment of breast cancer and urothelial carcinoma, but available information regarding adverse events (AEs) is limited. We aim to explore the AE induced by sacituzumab govitecan by mining the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The association between sacituzumab govitecan and AEs was evaluated using the information component. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for all identified signals to explore the risk factors associated with AEs leading to hospitalization. In total, 1,884 reports related to sacituzumab govitecan were retrieved, and 114 AE signals involving 20 systems were identified. The median time for onset of AEs was ~ 6-7 days after initiating treatment with sacituzumab govitecan, with over 80% of AEs occurring within 30 days. Subgroup analysis revealed that 14 signals were reported in men and 110 in women. There were 58 signals reported in patients under 65 following the use of sacituzumab govitecan, 59 signals in patients over 65, and 31 signals were present in both groups. Multivariable analysis showed that being male and the occurrence of colitis, pneumonitis, febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, sepsis, dehydration, and diarrhea were risk factors leading to hospitalization with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89. Additionally, sensitivity analysis revealed that this study had good robustness. This is the first retrospective analysis based on FAERS to review the safety of sacituzumab govitecan. The results highlight the need to closely monitor adverse reactions such as neutropenia, diarrhea, colitis, and sepsis when using sacituzumab govitecan.

Sacituzumab Govitecan as a Second-Line Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy, the only treatment option for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), showed decreased survival rates. Trophoblast cell surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) could be a possible target for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs).

OBJECTIVE

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an anti-Trop-2 ADC for pretreating relapsed/refractory mTNBC patients, was studied to know the efficacy and safety profile of the drug in mTNBC.

METHODS

The present review searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), WHO Clinical Trial Registry, Clinical Trials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until December 25, 2022. The studies searched comprised randomized trials and observational studies (retrospective [case-control, cross-sectional] and prospective [cohort designs]). Efficacy assessment was performed in terms of complete response (CR), partial response (PR), objective response rate (ORR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), and clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety in terms of adverse events.

RESULTS

The overall random-effects pooled prevalence of CR was 4.9 (95% CI: 3.2-7.1), PR was 35.6 (95% CI: 31.5-39.9), ORR was 6.8 (95% CI: 5.9-7.8), SD was 8.0 (95% CI: 6.7-9.4), PD was 5.1 (95% CI: 4.1-6.3), and CBR was 13.4 (95% CI: 11.8-15.1). Adverse events associated with the drug were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia, nausea, and others.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This is the first meta-analysis conducted in relapsed/refractory mTNBC patients and found that SG is efficacious but associated with some adverse effects that are related to exposure to the drug. The application of these results will allow clinicians to use SG in the management of patients with mTNBC.

TRPML1 as a potential therapeutic target for triple-negative breast cancer: a review

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most refractory subtype of breast cancer, and effective treatments are urgently needed owing to its poor prognosis. Surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, alone or in combination, are the leading choices for TNBC therapy. Although promising approaches and procedures have emerged, several challenges, such as off-target effects, drug resistance, and severe side effects, remain to be addressed. Recently, transient receptor potential channel mucolipin 1 (TRPML1) has attracted the attention of researchers because its expression has been implicated in numerous diseases, including cancer. TRPML1 regulates biological events and signaling pathways, including autophagic flux, exocytosis, ionic homeostasis, and lysosomal biogenesis, all contributing to tumorigenesis and cancer progression. TRPML1 also functions as a building block for cancer cell growth, mitogenic signaling, priming tissues for metastasis, and activation of transcriptional programs, processes involved in several malignant tumors. This review provides an overview of breast cancer epidemiology and diagnostic techniques and then discusses the existing therapeutics. Additionally, we elaborate on the development of, and associated challenges to, TNBC diagnostics and treatment and the feasibility of TRPML1 as a therapeutic target for TNBC.

Polypharmacology: promises and new drugs in 2022

Polypharmacology is an emerging strategy of design, synthesis, and clinical implementation of pharmaceutical agents that act on multiple targets simultaneously. It should not be mixed up with polytherapy, which is based on the use of multiple selective drugs and is considered a cornerstone of current clinical practice. However, this 'classic' approach, when facing urgent medical challenges, such as multifactorial diseases, increasing resistance to pharmacotherapy, and multimorbidity, seems to be insufficient. The 'novel' polypharmacology concept leads to a more predictable pharmacokinetic profile of multi-target-directed ligands (MTDLs), giving a chance to avoid drug-drug interactions and improve patient compliance due to the simplification of dosing regimens. Plenty of recently marketed drugs interact with multiple biological targets or disease pathways. Many offer a significant additional benefit compared to the standard treatment regimens. In this paper, we will briefly outline the genesis of polypharmacology and its differences to polytherapy. We will also present leading concepts for obtaining MTDLs. Subsequently, we will describe some successfully marketed drugs, the mechanisms of action of which are based on the interaction with multiple targets. To get an idea, of whether MTDLs are indeed important in contemporary pharmacology, we also carefully analyzed drugs approved in 2022 in Germany: 10 out of them were found multi-targeting, including 7 antitumor agents, 1 antidepressant, 1 hypnotic, and 1 drug indicated for eye disease.

m6A readers, writers, erasers, and the m6A epitranscriptome in breast cancer

Epitranscriptomic modification of RNA regulates human development, health, and disease. The true diversity of the transcriptome in breast cancer including chemical modification of transcribed RNA (epitranscriptomics) is not well understood due to limitations of technology and bioinformatic analysis. N-6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant epitranscriptomic modification of mRNA and regulates splicing, stability, translation, and intracellular localization of transcripts depending on m6A association with reader RNA-binding proteins. m6A methylation is catalyzed by the METTL3 complex and removed by specific m6A demethylase ALKBH5, with the role of FTO as an 'eraser' uncertain. In this review, we provide an overview of epitranscriptomics related to mRNA and focus on m6A in mRNA and its detection. We summarize current knowledge on altered levels of writers, readers, and erasers of m6A and their roles in breast cancer and their association with prognosis. We summarize studies identifying m6A peaks and sites in genes in breast cancer cells.