Statin Use and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone Acetate

The Metabolic Landscape of Cancer Stem Cells: Insights and Implications for Therapy

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a subpopulation with self-renewal and differentiation capacities believed to be responsible for tumor initiation, progression, and recurrence. These cells exhibit unique metabolic features that contribute to their stemness and survival in hostile tumor microenvironments. Like non-stem cancer cells, CSCs primarily rely on glycolysis for ATP production, akin to the Warburg effect. However, CSCs also show increased dependence on alternative metabolic pathways, such as oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) and fatty acid metabolism, which provide necessary energy and building blocks for self-renewal and therapy resistance. The metabolic plasticity of CSCs enables them to adapt to fluctuating nutrient availability and hypoxic conditions within the tumor. Recent studies highlight the importance of these metabolic shifts in maintaining the CSC phenotype and promoting cancer progression. The CSC model suggests that a small, metabolically adaptable subpopulation drives tumor growth and therapy resistance. CSCs can switch between glycolysis and mitochondrial metabolism, enhancing their survival under stress and dormant states. Targeting CSC metabolism offers a promising therapeutic strategy; however, their adaptability complicates eradication. A multi-targeted approach addressing various metabolic pathways is essential for effective CSC elimination, underscoring the need for further research into specific CSC markers and mechanisms that distinguish their metabolism from normal stem cells for successful therapeutic intervention.

Are statins onco- suppressive agents for every type of tumor? A systematic review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Statins, in the role of anti-cancer agents, have been used in many types of cancers with results in some cases promising while, in others, disappointing.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this review is to identify and highlight data from literature on the successes or failure of using statins as anti-cancer agents. We asked ourselves the following two questions:1. Could statins, which are taken mostly to reduce cardiovascular risk, guarantee a lower incidence or a better cancer disease prognosis, concerning local recurrence, metastasis or mortality?2. Does statins intake (before and/or after cancer diagnosis) improve the prognosis or increase the chemotherapeutic action when combined with other anticancer therapies? For the first question twenty-seven manuscripts have been selected, for the second one, twenty-eight.

EXPERT OPINION

There are data which correlate statins with a possible tumor suppressive action among the following cancers: breast, lung, prostate and head and neck. Lastly, for gastric cancer and colorectal there is no evidence of a correlation. The onco-suppressive efficacy of statins is mainly related to the histopathological and/or molecular characteristics of the tumor cells, which have different characteristics.

Overcoming statin resistance in prostate cancer cells by targeting the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA-reductase

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent malignancy in men. While diagnostic and therapeutic interventions have substantially improved in recent years, disease relapse, treatment resistance, and metastasis remain significant contributors to prostate cancer-related mortality. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches are needed. Statins are inhibitors of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), the rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate pathway which plays an essential role in cholesterol homeostasis. Numerous preclinical studies have provided evidence for the pleiotropic antitumor effects of statins. However, results from clinical studies remain controversial and have shown substantial benefits to even no effects on human malignancies including prostate cancer. Potential statin resistance mechanisms of tumor cells may account for such discrepancies. In our study, we treated human prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, C4-2B, DU-145, LNCaP) with simvastatin, atorvastatin, and rosuvastatin. PC3 cells demonstrated high statin sensitivity, resulting in a significant loss of vitality and clonogenic potential (up to - 70%; p < 0.001) along with an activation of caspases (up to 4-fold; p < 0.001). In contrast, C4-2B and DU-145 cells were statin-resistant. Statin treatment induced a restorative feedback in statin-resistant C4-2B and DU-145 cells through upregulation of the HMGCR gene and protein expression (up to 3-folds; p < 0.01) and its transcription factor sterol-regulatory element binding protein 2 (SREBP-2). This feedback was absent in PC3 cells. Blocking the feedback using HMGCR-specific small-interfering (si)RNA, the SREBP-2 activation inhibitor dipyridamole or the HMGCR degrader SR12813 abolished statin resistance in C4-2B and DU-145 and induced significant activation of caspases by statin treatment (up to 10-fold; p < 0.001). Consistently, long-term treatment with sublethal concentrations of simvastatin established a stable statin resistance of a PC3SIM subclone accompanied by a significant upregulation of both baseline as well as post-statin HMGCR protein (gene expression up to 70-fold; p < 0.001). Importantly, the statin-resistant phenotype of PC3SIM cells was reversible by HMGCR-specific siRNA and dipyridamole. Our investigations reveal a key role of a restorative feedback driven by the HMGCR/SREBP-2 axis in statin resistance mechanisms of prostate cancer cells.

Statin use and outcomes of oncological treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer

To compare the effect of statin use in relation to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treatment, we assessed the risk of ADT-treated PCa-patients to initiate CRPC treatment by statin use and the outcomes of CRPC treatment by statin use. Our study cohort consisted of 1169 men who participated in the Finnish Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (FinRSPC) and initiated androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) during the follow-up (1996-2017). Statin use was associated with slightly decreased risk of initiating CRPC treatment (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.47-0.97) with a 5.7 years' median follow-up until CRPC for non-users and 7.5 years for statin users. The risk of discontinuation of first or second line CRPC treatment due to inefficacy was not modified by statin use and the results remained similar in subgroup analysis assessing separately patients treated with taxans or androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. We observed an inverse association between statin use and the risk of initiation of the CRPC treatment. No beneficial risk modification by statin use during CRPC treatment was observed. These results suggest that statins might be beneficial during hormone-sensitive phase but not in the later phases of prostate cancer treatment.

The effects of statins in patients with advanced-stage cancers - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Statin therapy has been shown to reduce mortality in a wide range of cancer types and overall stages. Still, there is uncertainty about its efficacy in increasing survival among advanced cancer patients.

Methods

We conducted a meta-analysis with data from all studies that compared the hazard ratio of overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival in patients with advanced-stage cancer who receive statin therapy. Studies were selected from the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their inception to December 31, 2022. Cancer types are limited to those rarely screened during the annual examination and more likely to develop into advanced stages, such as lung, pancreatic and ovarian cancers. This resulted in 27 studies eligible for meta-analysis.

Results

Statin therapy was associated with a 26% decreased risk of overall survival (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67, 0.81), 26% decreased risk of cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.88), and 24% decreased risk of progression-free survival (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.87) for advanced-stage cancer patients. The associations were not attenuated or reinforced by study design, study regions, cancer types, or other medical care. Concomitant use of other anticancer medications did not result in confounding effects.

Conclusions

Statin therapy produces significant benefits on overall survival and cancer-specific survival. Although the benefits might be lower than the approved immunotherapy medications, its cost-effectiveness could lead to dramatic health consequences. Concomitant use of statin drugs as cancer treatments is highly recommended in future clinical trials.

Targeting lipid metabolism in metastatic prostate cancer

Despite key advances in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa), a proportion of men have de novo resistance, and all will develop resistance to current therapeutics over time. Aberrant lipid metabolism has long been associated with prostate carcinogenesis and progression, but more recently there has been an explosion of preclinical and clinical data which is informing new clinical trials. This review explores the epidemiological links between obesity and metabolic syndrome and PCa, the evidence for altered circulating lipids in PCa and their potential role as biomarkers, as well as novel therapeutic strategies for targeting lipids in men with PCa, including therapies widely used in cardiovascular disease such as statins, metformin and lifestyle modification, as well as novel targeted agents such as sphingosine kinase inhibitors, DES1 inhibitors and agents targeting FASN and beta oxidation.

Statin Use Is Associated with Better Prognosis of Patients with Prostate Cancer after Definite Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

OBJECTIVE

Although the prognostic effect of statins on patients with prostate cancer (PCa) has been frequently evaluated, a consistent result is still lacking. We aimed to evaluate the association between statin use and mortality among patients with PCa after definite therapies.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and other databases for cohort studies about the effect of statins on patients with PCa was performed until April 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using R software version 4.1.2.

RESULTS

24 cohort studies involving 369, 206 participants were finally included. We found statin use significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) with a pooled hazard ratio (pHR) = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84, 18 studies), especially for postdiagnostic statin users: pHR = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85) and patients who accepted androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): pHR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.59-0.81). Statin use was also associated with a 24% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM): pHR = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85, 17 studies), especially for postdiagnostic statin users: pHR = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85) and patients treated with ADT: pHR = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) or radiotherapy (RT): pHR = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50-0.93).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the use of statins could promote the prognosis of patients with PCa, especially for postdiagnostic users. For patients who received either ADT or radical prostatectomy (RP), statin use could decrease the PCSM. As for those who received either ADT or RT, statin use could decrease the ACM.

Statin Use and Survival Among Men Receiving Androgen-Ablative Therapies for Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Epidemiological evidence supports a role for statins in improving survival in advanced prostate cancer, particularly among men receiving androgen-ablative therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To study the association between statin use and survival among men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs).

DATA SOURCES

This systemic review and meta-analysis used sources from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epub Ahead of Print, Cochrane Clinical Trials, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science from inception to September 6, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

Observational studies reporting associations of concurrent statin use and survival outcomes (in hazard ratios [HRs]).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two authors independently abstracted all data. Summary estimates pooled multivariable HRs with 95% CIs using the generic inverse variance method with random-effects modeling. A priori specified subgroup and sensitivity analyses were undertaken, and heterogeneity, study quality, and publication bias were evaluated. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Overall mortality and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM).

RESULTS

Twenty-five cohorts of 119 878 men (65 488 statin users [55%]) with more than 74 416 deaths were included. Concurrent statin use was associated with a 27% reduction in the risk of overall mortality (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.82]; I2 = 83%) and a 35% reduction in the risk of PCSM (HR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58-0.73]; I2 = 74%), with substantial heterogeneity in both estimates. Subgroup analyses identified a PCSM advantage associated with statins for men receiving ARATs compared with ADT alone (HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.30-0.55] vs 0.68 [95% CI, 0.60-0.76]; P = .002 for difference). Confidence in the evidence was rated low for both outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this meta-analysis show that concurrent statin use was associated with reduced overall mortality and PCSM among men receiving androgen-ablative therapies for advanced prostate cancer. These findings are limited by the observational nature of the data and residual unexplained interstudy heterogeneity. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to validate these results.

Effects of metformin and statins on outcomes in men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer: Secondary analysis of COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302

BACKGROUND

The associations of metformin and statins with overall survival (OS) and prostate specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR) in trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether metformin or statins ± abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone (AAP) influence OS and PSA-RR.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANT

COU-AA-301 and COU-AA-302 patients were stratified by metformin and statin use. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazards ratio (HR) stratified by concomitant medications, and a random effects model was used to pool HR. We compared PSA-RR using Chi χ² test.

RESULTS

In COU-AA-301-AAP, metformin was associated with improved PSA-RR (41.1% versus 28.6%) but not prolonged OS. In COU-AA-301-placebo-P, there was no association between metformin and prolonged OS or PSA-RR. In COU-AA-302-AAP, metformin was associated with prolonged OS (adjHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.98) and improved PSA-RR (72.7% versus 60.0%). In COU-AA-302-P, metformin was associated with prolonged OS (adjHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93). In pooled analysis, OS was prolonged among those treated with metformin (pooled HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95).In COU-AA-301-AAP, statins were associated with an improved OS (adjHR 0.76, 95% CI 0.62-0.93), while there was no difference in COU-AA-301-P. There was no association with statins and OS in either COU-AA-302 groups. When pooling HR, OS was prolonged among those treated with statins (pooled HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.88).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of post-hoc sub-analyses, metformin and statins are associated with a prolonged OS and increased PSA-RR, particularly in combination with AAP.

Influence of statins in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with new antiandrogen therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To evaluate whether the addition of statins to the new antiandrogens (enzalutamide or abiraterone) affects overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Methods

We searched studies in English language including the keywords statins, overall survival, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, at PubMed^® (MEDLINE^®), Embase and Cochrane databases.

Results

A total of 195 articles were initially identified, but only four met the inclusion criteria and were selected for the meta-analysis. A total of 955 patients, 632 on the new antiandrogens only group, and 323 on the new antiandrogens + statins group, were analyzed. In all four studies the combination therapy (new antiandrogens + statin) was well tolerated, regardless of which new antiandrogens were used. Neither the type of statin nor the doses and duration of use were well specified in the studies. The combination therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was associated with an overall survival improvement, and a 46% reduction in death (hazard ratio of 0.54; 95%CI 0.34-0.87; p<0.01) in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

There seems to be a clinical benefit with the association of statins to the new antiandrogens in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, suggesting longer overall survival with no important collateral effect. However, due to fragility of the studies available in the literature, we are not yet capable of recommending this combination of drugs in the clinical practice. Further randomized prospective studies are warranted to confirm these beneficial outcomes.

Statins and prostate cancer-hype or hope? The biological perspective

Growing evidence suggests that men prescribed a statin for cholesterol control have a lower risk of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) and improved treatment outcomes; however, the mechanism by which statins elicit their anti-neoplastic effects is not well understood and is likely multifaceted. Statins are potent and specific inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), the rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate (MVA) metabolic pathway. This two-part series is a review of the observational and experimental data on statins as anti-cancer agents in PCa. In this article, we describe the functional role that deregulated MVA metabolism plays in PCa progression and summarize the biological evidence and rationale for targeting the MVA pathway, with statins and other agents, for the treatment of PCa.

Overcoming enzalutamide resistance in metastatic prostate cancer by targeting sphingosine kinase

Background

Intrinsic resistance to androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSI) occurs in 20–30% of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Ceramide metabolism may have a role in ARSI resistance. Our study's aim is to investigate the association of the ceramide-sphingosine-1-phosphate (ceramide-S1P) signalling axis with ARSI resistance in mCRPC.

Methods

Lipidomic analysis (∼700 lipids) was performed on plasma collected from 132 men with mCRPC, before commencing enzalutamide or abiraterone. AR gene aberrations in 77 of these men were identified by deep sequencing of circulating tumour DNA. Associations between circulating lipids, radiological progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined by Cox regression. Inhibition of ceramide-S1P signalling with sphingosine kinase (SPHK) inhibitors (PF-543 and ABC294640) on enzalutamide efficacy was investigated with in vitro assays, and transcriptomic and lipidomic analyses of prostate cancer (PC) cell lines (LNCaP, C42B, 22Rv1).

Findings

Men with elevated circulating ceramide levels had shorter rPFS (HR=2·3, 95% CI=1·5–3·6, p = 0·0004) and shorter OS (HR=2·3, 95% CI=1·4–36, p = 0·0005). The combined presence of an AR aberration with elevated ceramide levels conferred a worse prognosis than the presence of only one or none of these characteristics (median rPFS time = 3·9 vs 8·3 vs 17·7 months; median OS time = 8·9 vs 19·8 vs 34·4 months). SPHK inhibitors enhanced enzalutamide efficacy in PC cell lines. Transcriptomic and lipidomic analyses indicated that enzalutamide combined with SPHK inhibition enhanced PC cell death by SREBP-induced lipotoxicity.

Interpretation

Ceramide-S1P signalling promotes ARSI resistance, which can be reversed with SPHK inhibitors.

Glutamine and Cholesterol Plasma Levels and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Taxanes

Altered metabolism is a hallmark of cancer. Malignant cells metabolise glutamine to fulfil their metabolic needs. In prostate cancer, androgen receptor signalling promotes glutamine metabolism, which is also involved in cholesterol homeostasis. We aimed to determine whether the plasma glutamine levels correlate with the blood lipid profile, clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with metastatic castration resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC) undergoing taxanes. We retrospectively assessed the glutamine and glutamate levels in plasma samples by a bioluminescent assay. Pre-treatment glutamine, glutamate, cholesterol and triglycerides levels were correlated with patients' clinical characteristics, taxanes response and clinical outcomes. Seventy-five patients with mCRPC treated with taxanes were included. The plasma glutamine levels were significantly higher in patients that received abiraterone or enzalutamide prior to taxanes (p = 0.003). Besides, patients with low glutamine levels were more likely to present a PSA response to taxanes (p = 0.048). Higher glutamine levels were significantly correlated with shorter biochemical/clinical progression-free survival (PSA/RX-PFS) (median 2.5 vs. 4.2 months; p = 0.048) and overall survival (OS) (median 12.6 vs. 20.3; p = 0.008). High cholesterol levels independently predicted early PSA/RX-PFS (p = 0.034). High glutamine and cholesterol in the plasma from patients with mCRPC were associated with adverse clinical outcomes, supporting the relevance of further research on metabolism in prostate cancer progression.

Inhibition of Scavenger Receptor Class B Type 1 (SR-B1) Expression and Activity as a Potential Novel Target to Disrupt Cholesterol Availability in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

There have been several studies that have linked elevated scavenger receptor class b type 1 (SR-B1) expression and activity to the development and progression of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). SR-B1 facilitates the influx of cholesterol to the cell from lipoproteins in systemic circulation. This influx of cholesterol may be important for many cellular functions, including the synthesis of androgens. Castration-resistant prostate cancer tumors can synthesize androgens de novo to supplement the loss of exogenous sources often induced by androgen deprivation therapy. Silencing of SR-B1 may impact the ability of prostate cancer cells, particularly those of the castration-resistant state, to maintain the intracellular supply of androgens by removing a supply of cholesterol. SR-B1 expression is elevated in CRPC models and has been linked to poor survival of patients. The overarching belief has been that cholesterol modulation, through either synthesis or uptake inhibition, will impact essential signaling processes, impeding the proliferation of prostate cancer. The reduction in cellular cholesterol availability can impede prostate cancer proliferation through both decreased steroid synthesis and steroid-independent mechanisms, providing a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of prostate cancer. In this article, we discuss and highlight the work on SR-B1 as a potential novel drug target for CRPC management.

Prostate Cancer Radiogenomics-From Imaging to Molecular Characterization

Radiomics and genomics represent two of the most promising fields of cancer research, designed to improve the risk stratification and disease management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Radiomics involves a conversion of imaging derivate quantitative features using manual or automated algorithms, enhancing existing data through mathematical analysis. This could increase the clinical value in PCa management. To extract features from imaging methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the empiric nature of the analysis using machine learning and artificial intelligence could help make the best clinical decisions. Genomics information can be explained or decoded by radiomics. The development of methodologies can create more-efficient predictive models and can better characterize the molecular features of PCa. Additionally, the identification of new imaging biomarkers can overcome the known heterogeneity of PCa, by non-invasive radiological assessment of the whole specific organ. In the future, the validation of recent findings, in large, randomized cohorts of PCa patients, can establish the role of radiogenomics. Briefly, we aimed to review the current literature of highly quantitative and qualitative results from well-designed studies for the diagnoses, treatment, and follow-up of prostate cancer, based on radiomics, genomics and radiogenomics research.

Consistent use of lipid lowering therapy in HIV infection is associated with low mortality

BACKGROUND

In people living with HIV (PLWH), statins may be disproportionately effective but remain underutilized. A large prospective trial in patients with low to moderate cardiovascular (ASCVD) risk will reveal whether they should be considered in all PLWH. But its effect size may not apply to real-world PLWH with higher ASCVD and mortality risk. Also, the clinical role of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and LLT adherence in this population is unknown.

METHODS

Comparative multi-level marginal structural model for all-cause mortality examining four time-updated exposure levels to LLT, antihypertensives, and aspirin in a virtual cohort of older PLWH. Incident coronary, cerebrovascular, and overall ASCVD events, serious infections, and new cancer diagnoses served as explanatory outcomes.

RESULTS

In 23,276 HIV-infected US-veterans who were followed for a median of 5.2 years after virologic suppression overall mortality was 33/1000 patient years: > 3 times higher than in the US population. Use of antihypertensives or aspirin was associated with increased mortality. Past LLT use (> 1 year ago) had no effect on mortality. LLT exposure in the past year was associated with a reduced hazard ratio (HR) of death: 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.69, p < 0.0001 for statin containing LLT and 0.71 (CI: 0.54-0.93), p = 0.03 for statin-free LLT. For consistent LLT use (> 11/12 past months) the HR of death was 0.48 (CI: 0.35-0.66) for statin-only LLT, 0.34 (CI: 0.23-0.52) for combination LLT, and 0.27 (CI: 0.15-0.48) for statin-free LLT (p < 0.0001 for all). The ASCVD risk in these patients was reduced in similar fashion. Use of statin containing LLT was also associated with reduced infection and cancer risk. Multiple contrasting subgroup analyses yielded comparable results. Confounding is unlikely to be a major contributor to our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

In PLWH, ongoing LLT use may lead to substantially lower mortality, but consistent long-term adherence may be required to reduce ASCVD risk. Consistent non-statin LLT may be highly effective and should be studied prospectively.

Statins as Anticancer Agents in the Era of Precision Medicine

Statins are widely prescribed cholesterol-lowering drugs that inhibit HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR), the rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate metabolic pathway. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that certain cancers depend on the mevalonate pathway for growth and survival, and, therefore, are vulnerable to statin therapy. However, these immediately available, well-tolerated, and inexpensive drugs have yet to be successfully repurposed and integrated into cancer patient care. In this review, we highlight recent advances and outline important considerations for advancing statins to clinical trials in oncology.

Association of Body Composition With Survival and Treatment Efficacy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Objectives: The association of body composition with survival and the efficacy of first-line treatment was investigated in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Methods: The records of CRPC patients treated with docetaxel or androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) between 2005 and 2018 were reviewed. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), visceral fat index, and subcutaneous fat index were evaluated using pretreatment computed tomography images.

Results: Of 230 eligible patients, 144 received docetaxel, and 86 received ARSi as the first-line treatment for CRPC. The SMI^hi (based on median values) group had higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (median 13.5 vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.030), radiologic progression-free survival (14.9 vs. 9.1 months, p < 0.001), and overall survival (24.1 vs. 16.9 months, p = 0.015) than the SMI^lo group. In docetaxel-treated patients, the SMI^hi group had higher PSA progression-free survival (13.5 vs. 5.9 months, p = 0.016) and radiologic progression-free survival (14.6 vs. 6.7 months, p < 0.001) than the SMI^lo group. However, PSA progression-free survival and radiologic progression-free survival were comparable between the two groups in ARSi-treated patients. SMI was independently associated with the risk of radiologic progression in patients treated with docetaxel but not in those treated with ARSi.

Conclusions: High skeletal muscle mass may be associated with reduced risk of disease progression and mortality in patients with CRPC. However, the significance of these relationships is limited in patients treated with docetaxel. These results suggest that assessing skeletal muscle mass may be worthwhile when selecting treatments for CRPC; however, further prospective validation and large-scale studies are needed.

Combination of statin/vitamin D and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): a post hoc analysis of two randomized clinical trials

In castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients, observational studies have reported that statins may boost the antitumor activity of abiraterone (AA) and data suggest an improvement in efficacy; conclusions with vitamin D are less clear but an eventual benefit has been pointed. We conducted a post hoc analysis of individual patient data of CRPC patients treated with prednisone and/or AA with or without statins/vitamin D on randomized clinical trials. In the COU-AA-301 trial, use of AA with statin and vitamin D reduced the risk of death by 38% (p = 0.0007) while AA alone was associated with a decrease of 10% (p = 0.025), compared to prednisone alone. Meanwhile, in the COU-AA-302 trial, use of AA plus statin plus vitamin D was associated with a reduced risk of death of 26% (p = 0.0054). In this data analysis from two prospective randomized clinical trials, statin and vitamin D use was associated with superior overall survival in metastatic CRPC patients treated with AA and prednisone. To our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting the impact of statin plus vitamin D in this population. New strategies using big data may help to clarify these questions easily and in a most cost-effective approach.

The effect of statins on advanced prostate cancer patients with androgen deprivation therapy or abiraterone/enzalutamide: A systematic review and meta-analysis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of statin use on the treatment outcomes (i.e. overall survival and cancer-specific survival) among advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or abiraterone/enzalutamide.

METHODS

The original studies, examining the effects of statins on the outcomes (i.e. overall survival and cancer-specific survival) among PCa patients treated with ADT or abiraterone/enzalutamide, were identified through a systematic search by two independent reviewers in the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology databases. Databases were searched using keywords (abiraterone OR enzalutamide OR androgen deprivation therapy) AND statin. In total, nine eligible studies from 111 references were included for final analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Statin use significantly lowered the risk of all-cause mortality (100 709 patients, HR = 0.73, 95%CI = 0.64-0.83, P < .00001) and the risk of cancer-specific mortality (100 343 patients, HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.53-0.77, P < .00001) in advanced PCa patients treated with ADT. The sensitivity analysis showed that the results were reliable. However, it could not generate reliable evidence in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with abiraterone/enzalutamide, as relevant studies were limited and had inconsistent results.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The review indicated that the use of statins in combination with ADT was associated with better all-cause survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with advanced PCa. Randomized controlled trials should be conducted to establish efficacy of statins among PCa patients.

Upregulation of Scavenger Receptor B1 Is Required for Steroidogenic and Nonsteroidogenic Cholesterol Metabolism in Prostate Cancer

Aberrant cholesterol metabolism is increasingly appreciated to be essential for prostate cancer initiation and progression. Transcript expression of the high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol receptor scavenger receptor B1 (SR-B1) is elevated in primary prostate cancer. Hypothesizing that SR-B1 expression may help facilitate malignant transformation, we document increased SR-B1 protein and transcript expression in prostate cancer relative to normal prostate epithelium that persists in lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) metastasis. As intratumoral steroid synthesis from the precursor cholesterol can drive androgen receptor (AR) pathway activity in CRPC, we screened androgenic benign and cancer cell lines for sensitivity to SR-B1 antagonism. Benign cells were insensitive to SR-B1 antagonism, and cancer line sensitivity inversely correlated with expression levels of full-length and splice variant AR. In androgen-responsive CRPC cell model C4-2, SR-B1 antagonism suppressed cholesterol uptake, de novo steroidogenesis, and AR activity. SR-B1 antagonism also suppressed growth and viability and induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and autophagy. The inability of exogenous steroids to reverse these effects indicates that AR pathway activation is insufficient to overcome cytotoxic stress caused by a decrease in the availability of cholesterol. Furthermore, SR-B1 antagonism decreased cholesterol uptake, growth, and viability of the AR-null CRPC cell model PC-3, and the small-molecule SR-B1 antagonist block lipid transport-1 decreased xenograft growth rate despite poor pharmacologic properties. Overall, our findings show that SR-B1 is upregulated in primary and castration-resistant disease and is essential for cholesterol uptake needed to drive both steroidogenic and nonsteroidogenic biogenic pathways, thus implicating SR-B1 as a novel and potentially actionable target in CRPC. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings highlight SR-B1 as a potential target in primary and castration-resistant prostate cancer that is essential for cholesterol uptake needed to drive steroidogenic and nonsteroidogenic biogenic pathways.

Statin use and survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide after docetaxel failure: the international retrospective observational STABEN study

Background

Statins may potentiate the effects of anti-hormonal agents for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) through further disruption of essential steroidogenic processes. We investigated the effects of statin use on clinical outcomes in patients with mCRPC receiving abiraterone or enzalutamide.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study including patients that received abiraterone or enzalutamide for mCRPC. The effect of concurrent statin use on outcomes was evaluated. The associations of statins with early (≤12 weeks) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines (> 30%), cancer-specific survival and overall survival (OS) were evaluated after controlling for known prognostic factors.

Results

Five hundred and ninety-eight patients treated with second-line abiraterone or enzalutamide after docetaxel for mCRPC were included. A total of 199 men (33.3%) received statins during abiraterone/enzalutamide treatment. Median OS was 20.8 months (95% CI = 18.3–23.2) for patients who received statins, versus 12.9 months (95% CI = 11.4–14.6) for patients who did not receive statins (P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, alkaline phosphatase, PSA, neutrophil-to-lymphocytes ratio, Charlson comorbidity score, Gleason score, visceral disease, hemoglobin, opiate use and abiraterone versus enzalutamide treatment, the use of statin therapy was associated with a 53% reduction in the overall risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.47; 95% CI = 0.35–0.63; P < 0.001). Statin use was also associated with a 63% increased odds of a > 30% PSA decline within the first 12 weeks of treatment (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.03–2.60; P = 0.039).

Conclusions

In this retrospective cohort, statin use was significantly associated with both prolonged OS and cancer-specific survival and increased early > 30% PSA declines. Prospective validation is warranted.