1
|
Fu J, Franzen N, Aas E, Koen van der Mijn JC, van Leeuwen PJ, Retel VP. Early Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Using Whole-Genome Sequencing for Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2025; 28:720-729. [PMID: 40049327 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2024] [Revised: 01/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/16/2025] [Indexed: 03/30/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to assess the potential cost-effectiveness of using whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-guided systemic therapy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer compared with the European Association of Urology guideline recommended diagnostics from a Dutch societal perspective. METHODS A decision analytic model combining a decision tree and partitioned survival models was developed to link diagnostic results with subsequent biomarker-guided treatments. Two diagnostic strategies, WGS and guideline-recommended practice-the genomic testing for breast cancer gene 1/2 (BRCA1/2) and deficient mismatch repair, were simulated to compare the health outcome and cost. Treatment effectiveness was estimated through survival analysis using published trial data. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to examine result robustness and to identify conditions under which WGS may be cost-effective. RESULTS WGS identified an additional 21% of patients eligible for personalized therapy (PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors and olaparib), resulting in an incremental increase in cost (€14 260) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY = 0.05). These results yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €289 625 per QALY gained. WGS would become cost-effective if the cost of biomarker-guided therapies decreases by 62% and when identifying a proportion of 23% more patients with actional targets. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that future treatments with improved efficacy and reduced cost could potentially make the WGS strategy cost-effective. Its unaccounted potential value to identify prognostic biomarkers, diagnostic alternatives, and patient heterogeneity should be addressed in future research and considered for optimal implementation. New reimbursement options are needed considering the high prices of biomarker-guided therapies that drive the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjing Fu
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Nora Franzen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Aas
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - J C Koen van der Mijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
von Eyben FE, Kairemo K, Paller C, Hoffmann MA, Paganelli G, Virgolini I, Roviello G. 177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Is Favorable as Third-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Biomedicines 2021; 9:1042. [PMID: 34440246 PMCID: PMC8392412 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9081042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we aimed to assess the benefits and harms of third-line (L3) treatments in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Two reviewers searched for publications from 1 January 2006 to 30 June 2021. The review analyzed seven RCTs that included 3958 patients and eight treatments. Treatment with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based radioligand therapy (PRLT) resulted in a 1.3-times-higher rate of median PSA decline ≥50% than treatment with abiraterone, enzalutamide, mitoxantrone, or cabazitaxel (p = 0.00001). The likelihood was 97.6% for PRLT to bring about the best PSA response, out of the examined treatments. PRLT resulted in a 1.1-times-higher six-month rate of median radiographic progression-free survival. Treatment with PRLT in the VISION trial resulted in 1.05-times-higher twelve-month median overall survival than L3 treatment with cabazitaxel in other RCTs. PRLT more often resulted in severe thrombocytopenia and less often in severe leukopenia than did cabazitaxel. In conclusion, for patients with mCRPC, L3 treatment with PRLT is highly effective and safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finn E. von Eyben
- Center for Tobacco Control Research, Birkevej 17, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Kalevi Kairemo
- Docrates Cancer Center, Saukanpaaderanta 2, 18000 Helsinki, Finland;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Channing Paller
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA;
| | - Manuela Andrea Hoffmann
- Department of Occupational Health & Safety, Federal Ministry of Defense, Fontaingraben 150, 53123 Bonn, Germany;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Guttenberg University in Mainz, Langenbeckerstrasse 15, 55101 Mainz, Germany
| | - Giovanni Paganelli
- Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura Tumori, IRST, Via Piero Maroncelli, 4704 Meldola, Italy;
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital in Innsbruck, Wilhelm-Geil Strasse 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;
| | - Giandomenico Roviello
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Piazza S. Marco 4, 50121 Florence, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van der Doelen MJ, Mehra N, van Oort IM, Looijen-Salamon MG, Janssen MJR, Custers JAE, Slootbeek PHJ, Kroeze LI, Bruchertseifer F, Morgenstern A, Haberkorn U, Kratochwil C, Nagarajah J, Gerritsen WR. Clinical outcomes and molecular profiling of advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with 225Ac-PSMA-617 targeted alpha-radiation therapy. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:729.e7-729.e16. [PMID: 33353867 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Targeted alpha-radiation therapy (TAT) with 225Ac-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligands is a promising novel treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. However, limited data are available on efficacy, quality of life (QoL), and pretherapeutic biomarkers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 225Ac-PSMA TAT and impact on QoL in advanced mCRPC, and to explore predictive biomarkers on pretherapeutic metastatic tissue biopsies. METHODS Observational cohort study including consecutive patients treated with 225Ac-PSMA TAT between February 2016 and July 2018. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Furthermore, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) changes, radiological response, safety, QoL, and xerostomia were evaluated. Biopsies were analyzed with immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing. RESULTS Thirteen patients were included. Median OS was 8.5 months for the total cohort and 12.6 months for PSMA radioligand therapy-naïve patients. PSA declines of ≥90% and ≥50% were observed in 46% and 69% of patients, respectively. Six patients were radiologically evaluable; 50% showed partial response. All patients showed >90% total tumor volume reduction on PET imaging. Patients experienced clinically relevant decrease of pain and QoL improvement in physical and role functioning domains. Xerostomia persisted during follow-up. Patients with high baseline immunohistochemical PSMA expression or DNA damage repair alterations tended to have longer OS. CONCLUSIONS TAT with 225Ac-PSMA resulted in remarkable survival and biochemical responses in advanced mCRPC patients. Patients experienced clinically relevant QoL improvement, although xerostomia was found to be nontransient. Baseline immunohistochemical PSMA expression and DNA damage repair status are potential predictive biomarkers of response to 225Ac-PSMA TAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten J van der Doelen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Niven Mehra
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge M van Oort
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Urology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel J R Janssen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - José A E Custers
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter H J Slootbeek
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie I Kroeze
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Bruchertseifer
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Nuclear Safety and Security, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Alfred Morgenstern
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Nuclear Safety and Security, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Germany
| | | | - James Nagarajah
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Winald R Gerritsen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|