The Suggested Unique Association Between the Various Statin Subgroups and Prostate Cancer

Statin Concentration in Prostatic Tissue is Subtype- and Dose-dependent

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate for the first time, comparative serum and prostate tissue concentrations of lipophilic and hydrophilic statins.

METHODS

After reviewing all patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1993 and 2019, we selected 80 patients taking atorvastatin (lipophilic) or rosuvastatin (hydrophilic) for cholesterol control and with available banked fresh-frozen tissue from the prostatectomy. Primary endpoint was serum and prostate statin concentration measured by HPLC-mass spectrometry analysis. Serum/prostate statin concentrations were compared between patients on atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, and patients receiving high- and low-dose statin, using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients were taking atorvastatin and 41 were taking rosuvastatin. Thirty-eight and 42 were taking high- and low-dose statin, respectively. Statin concentration was measurable in the prostatic tissue of 15 patients (38.4%) taking atorvastatin (33.3% high-dose vs 42.8% low-dose) compared to 22 (53.6%) taking rosuvastatin (55% high-dose vs 52.3% low-dose). Median tissue concentration of rosuvastatin was greater than atorvastatin (3.98 ng/g vs 0.96 ng/g, P <.001). Dose-dependency was observed: median prostate concentration was higher in those taking high-dose versus low-dose statin for both atorvastatin (1.22 ng/g vs 0.79 ng/g, P = .69) and rosuvastatin (5.21 ng/g vs 1.99 ng/g, P <.001).

CONCLUSION

We have shown, for the first time, that lipophilic and hydrophilic statins can be measured in the prostate of patients with prostate cancer and that the concentrations are dependent on dose. Moreover, rosuvastatin, a hydrophilic statin, achieves a 4-fold higher concentration in the prostate.

Cholesterol Metabolism and Urinary System Tumors

Cancers of the urinary system account for 13.1% of new cancer cases and 7.9% of cancer-related deaths. Of them, renal cancer, bladder cancer, and prostate cancer are most prevalent and pose a substantial threat to human health and the quality of life. Prostate cancer is the most common malignant tumor in the male urinary system. It is the second most common type of malignant tumor in men, with lung cancer surpassing its incidence and mortality. Bladder cancer has one of the highest incidences and is sex-related, with men reporting a significantly higher incidence than women. Tumor development in the urinary system is associated with factors, such as smoking, obesity, high blood pressure, diet, occupational exposure, and genetics. The treatment strategies primarily involve surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Cholesterol metabolism is a crucial physiological process associated with developing and progressing urinary system tumors. High cholesterol levels are closely associated with tumor occurrence, invasion, and metastasis. This warrants thoroughly investigating the role of cholesterol metabolism in urinary system tumors and identifying novel treatment methods for the prevention, early diagnosis, targeted treatment, and drug resistance of urinary system tumors.

Statins may increase the risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Although statins are known to protect against cardiovascular accidents, their anti-inflammatory features could play a role in preventing tumorigenesis. We investigated the association between statin intake and prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and aggressiveness.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed. Our dataset on patients undergone systematic prostate biopsy from December 2008 to December 2022 was searched for histopathologic and clinical data. Prognostic Grade Group ≥3 tumors were defined as high-grade (HG). The association between Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), statin use and PCa diagnosis and HG disease was assessed using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Data on 1685 patients were collected; MetS affected 344 (20.4%) men and 138 (36.5%) were taking statins at least for 6 months at the time of biopsy. Among the 671 (39.8%) men diagnosed with PCa, 327 (48.7%) presented with a HG disease. Tumor incidence was higher among men taking statins, compared to controls (46.8% vs. 37.8%; P=0.002); also, high grade diseases were more common in the former group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (49.1% vs. 48.6%; P=0.89). Statin intake (OR 1.44; 95% CI [1.05-1.98]; P=0.02) independently predicted PCa diagnosis but not high-grade disease (P=0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use may be associated with an increased risk of PCa diagnosis.

Statin use and mortality risk in Asian patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the associations between the use of statins concurrent with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and the risks of mortality in Asian patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with PCa who were receiving any form of ADT and were being treated at public hospitals in Hong Kong from December 1999 to March 2021 were retrospectively identified, with follow-up conducted until September 2021. Patients who had received medical castration for <180 days without subsequent bilateral orchidectomy, those who had used statins concurrently with ADT for <180 days, and those with missing baseline total cholesterol levels were excluded. Statin users were defined as individuals who had used statins for ≥180 days concurrent with ADT, while non-users were those who had not used any statins. PCa-related mortality was the primary outcome, while all-cause mortality served as the secondary outcome. Inverse probability treatment weighting was employed to balance the covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 4920 patients were included, consisting of 2578 statin users and 2342 non-users (mean age 76.1 ± 8.2 years). Over a mean follow-up period of 4.2 ± 3.3 years, it was observed that statin users had significantly lower risks of both PCa-related mortality (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48, 0.65], p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (wHR 0.57 [95% CI 0.51, 0.63], p < 0.001), regardless of the type of ADT used. Notably, these associations were more pronounced among patients with less advanced PCa, as indicated by the absence of androgen receptor antagonist or chemotherapy usage (p value for interaction <0.001 for both outcomes).

CONCLUSION(S)

The use of statins concurrent with ADT was associated with reduced mortality risks among Asian patients with PCa. These findings suggest the need for additional research to explore the potential role of statins in the treatment of PCa patients.

27-hydroxycholesterol and DNA damage repair: implication in prostate cancer

Introduction

We previously reported that cholesterol homeostasis in prostate cancer (PC) is regulated by 27-hydroxycholesterol (27HC) and that CYP27A1, the enzyme that converts cholesterol to 27HC, is frequently lost in PCs. We observed that restoring the CYP27A1/27HC axis inhibited PC growth. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of 27HC-mediated anti-PC effects.

Methods

We employed in vitro models and human transcriptomics data to investigate 27HC mechanism of action in PC. LNCaP (AR+) and DU145 (AR-) cells were treated with 27HC or vehicle. Transcriptome profiling was performed using the Affymetrix GeneChip™ microarray system. Differential expression was determined, and gene set enrichment analysis was done using the GSEA software with hallmark gene sets from MSigDB. Key changes were validated at mRNA and protein levels. Human PC transcriptomes from six datasets were analyzed to determine the correlation between CYP27A1 and DNA repair gene expression signatures. DNA damage was assessed via comet assays.

Results

Transcriptome analysis revealed 27HC treatment downregulated Hallmark pathways related to DNA damage repair, decreased expression of FEN1 and RAD51, and induced "BRCAness" by downregulating genes involved in homologous recombination regulation in LNCaP cells. Consistently, we found a correlation between higher CYP27A1 expression (i.e., higher intracellular 27HC) and decreased expression of DNA repair gene signatures in castration-sensitive PC (CSPC) in human PC datasets. However, such correlation was less clear in metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). 27HC increased expression of DNA damage repair markers in PC cells, notably in AR+ cells, but no consistent effects in AR- cells and decreased expression in non-neoplastic prostate epithelial cells. While testing the clinical implications of this, we noted that 27HC treatment increased DNA damage in LNCaP cells via comet assays. Effects were reversible by adding back cholesterol, but not androgens. Finally, in combination with olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, we showed additive DNA damage effects.

Discussion

These results suggest 27HC induces "BRCAness", a functional state thought to increase sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, and leads to increased DNA damage, especially in CSPC. Given the emerging appreciation that defective DNA damage repair can drive PC growth, future studies are needed to test whether 27HC creates a synthetic lethality to PARP inhibitors and DNA damaging agents in CSPC.

Association between statins exposure and risk of skin cancer: an updated meta-analysis

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between statin (lipophilic statin and hydrophilic statin) exposure and the risk of skin cancer. The incidence of skin cancer under statin exposure was used as the primary outcome, and the relevant studies were screened from Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO electronic database until September 2022. Ten observational studies and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The statistical results indicated that in lipophilic statins, the exposed group had a higher risk of skin cancer than the non-exposed group (OR: 1.09, P = 0.003). However, compared with the non-exposed group, there was no significant difference between hydrophilic statins exposure and the incidence of skin cancer (OR: 1.02, P = 0.341). Further subgroup analysis of the subtypes of statins revealed that compared with the non-exposed group, exposure to lovastatin (OR: 1.18, P = 0.048) or simvastatin (OR: 1.11, P < 0.001) was a risk factor for skin cancer. Besides, subgroup analysis based on the subtypes of skin cancer demonstrated that the risks of melanoma (OR: 1.13, P = 0.009), basal cell carcinoma (BCC) (OR: 1.05, P = 0.036), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (OR: 1.13, P = 0.026) under lipophilic statin exposure were significantly higher than those in the non-exposed group. On the contrary, compared with the non-exposed group, the risk of BCC was significantly reduced under the exposure of hydrophilic statins (OR: 0.93, P = 0.031). This study showed that the relationship between statin exposure and skin cancer risk was affected by the subtypes of statins and skin cancer subtypes.

Association Between Statin Exposure and Incidence and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Observational Studies

It is widely thought that statins have huge therapeutic potential against prostate cancer (PCA). This study aimed to investigate the effect of statin exposure on PCA incidence and prognosis. PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for observational studies on the association between statin exposure and PCA from inception until July 2022. The primary endpoints were the incidence of PCA and the survival rate. A total of 21 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimates showed that exposure to hydrophilic statins was not associated with the incidence of PCA (odds ratio [OR]=0.94, 95% CI=0.88-1.01, P =0.075), while the incidence of PCA was significantly decreased in populations exposed to lipophilic statins compared with the nonexposed group (OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.90-0.98, P =0.001), mainly in Western countries (OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.91-0.98, P =0.006). Subgroup analysis showed that simvastatin (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.71-0.97, P =0.016) effectively reduced the incidence of PCA. The prognosis of PCA in patients exposed to both hydrophilic (hazard ratio [HR]=0.57, 95% CI=0.49-0.66, P <0.001) and lipophilic (HR=0.65, 95% CI=0.58-0.73, P <0.001) statins were better than in the nonexposed group, and this improvement was more significant in the East than in Western countries. This study demonstrates that statins can reduce the incidence of PCA and improve prognosis, and are affected by population region and statin properties (hydrophilic and lipophilic).

Targeting lipid metabolism in metastatic prostate cancer

Despite key advances in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa), a proportion of men have de novo resistance, and all will develop resistance to current therapeutics over time. Aberrant lipid metabolism has long been associated with prostate carcinogenesis and progression, but more recently there has been an explosion of preclinical and clinical data which is informing new clinical trials. This review explores the epidemiological links between obesity and metabolic syndrome and PCa, the evidence for altered circulating lipids in PCa and their potential role as biomarkers, as well as novel therapeutic strategies for targeting lipids in men with PCa, including therapies widely used in cardiovascular disease such as statins, metformin and lifestyle modification, as well as novel targeted agents such as sphingosine kinase inhibitors, DES1 inhibitors and agents targeting FASN and beta oxidation.

Statin Use Is Associated with Better Prognosis of Patients with Prostate Cancer after Definite Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

OBJECTIVE

Although the prognostic effect of statins on patients with prostate cancer (PCa) has been frequently evaluated, a consistent result is still lacking. We aimed to evaluate the association between statin use and mortality among patients with PCa after definite therapies.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed and other databases for cohort studies about the effect of statins on patients with PCa was performed until April 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using R software version 4.1.2.

RESULTS

24 cohort studies involving 369, 206 participants were finally included. We found statin use significantly reduced the risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) with a pooled hazard ratio (pHR) = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84, 18 studies), especially for postdiagnostic statin users: pHR = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85) and patients who accepted androgen deprivation therapy (ADT): pHR = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.59-0.81). Statin use was also associated with a 24% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality (ACM): pHR = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.68-0.85, 17 studies), especially for postdiagnostic statin users: pHR = 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85) and patients treated with ADT: pHR = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.82) or radiotherapy (RT): pHR = 0.68 (95% CI: 0.50-0.93).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the use of statins could promote the prognosis of patients with PCa, especially for postdiagnostic users. For patients who received either ADT or radical prostatectomy (RP), statin use could decrease the PCSM. As for those who received either ADT or RT, statin use could decrease the ACM.

Association of statins use and mortality outcomes in prostate cancer patients who received androgen deprivation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

While several recent studies investigated the influence of statins on survival outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), definitive conclusions are still missing. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to develop an overarching framework for the association of statins use and survival outcomes in PCa patients who receive ADT.

Material and methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature assessing the survival outcomes for statin compared to non-statin users in PCa patients who received ADT. We searched PubMed and Web of Science for studies published before March 1, 2021. We used the random effect model in the presence of heterogeneity and the fixed-effects model in the absence of heterogeneity per the I² statistic. We did two meta-analyses; the primary meta-analysis was accomplished for articles reporting cancer-specific survival (CSS) as an outcome. A secondary meta-analysis was completed for articles reporting overall survival (OS) as an outcome.

Results

Ten studies were eligible for inclusion. Nine studies included in the first meta-analysis comprising 136,285 patients showed no statistically significant difference in CSS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.49–1.21) between statin users and non-users in PCa patients who received ADT. In four studies included in the second meta-analysis comprising 95,032 patients, statin users had a significantly better OS compared to non-users (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.62–0.73).

Conclusions

Although the combination of statins and ADT in PCa patients significantly improves OS, it seems not to be through an effect on cancer-specific factors.

The role of metformin, statins and diet in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A sound scientific basis has been emerging on the anti-neoplastic role of metformin, statins and dietary interventions. However, evidence in prostate cancer patients remains mixed owing to an absence of completed randomized trials. This overview examines the rationale for metformin, statins and dietary intervention for secondary prevention in men on active surveillance by summarizing current evidence base and biological mechanisms in influencing cancer progression and mortality.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify studies that evaluated the role of metformin, statins and diet in the secondary prevention of prostate cancer as well as those that described the anti-cancer mechanisms of these agents. The search included Pubmed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library from inception till August 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 14 trials on metformin, 21 trials on statins and 13 trials on dietary measures were evaluated. Majority were observational population-based cohort studies or meta-analysis of them. Three ongoing prospective randomized controlled trials were also reported. Overall, mixed results were obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of metformin and statins remains promising with several trials showing reduced rates of progression and cancer specific mortality. Combination therapy strategies have also been evaluated in more advanced patients showing synergism. Dietary interventions especially fruits, vegetables and fish intake has shown some benefit albeit with mixed results for others like legumes, red meat, coffee and multivitamins. Several ongoing randomized trials will provide stronger evidence in the future for secondary prevention.

Associations between Statin/Omega3 Usage and MRI-Based Radiomics Signatures in Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths among American men. Statins and omega-3 are two medications recently found to correlate with prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness, but the observed associations are complex and controversial. We therefore explore the novel application of radiomics in studying statin and omega-3 usage in prostate cancer patients. On MRIs of 91 prostate cancer patients, two regions of interest (ROIs), the whole prostate and the peripheral region of the prostate, were manually segmented. From each ROI, 944 radiomic features were extracted after field bias correction and normalization. Heatmaps were generated to study the radiomic feature patterns against statin or omega-3 usage. Radiomics models were trained on selected features and evaluated with 500-round threefold cross-validation for each drug/ROI combination. On the 1500 validation datasets, the radiomics model achieved average AUCs of 0.70, 0.74, 0.78, and 0.72 for omega-3/prostate, omega-3/peripheral, statin/prostate, and statin/peripheral, respectively. As the first study to analyze radiomics in relation to statin and omega-3 uses in prostate cancer patients, our study preliminarily established the existence of imaging-identifiable tissue-level changes in the prostate and illustrated the potential usefulness of radiomics for further exploring these medications’ effects and mechanisms in prostate cancer.

Statin Type and Cancer Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Type 2 and Solid Tumors

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects 10% of Americans and is associated with an increased incidence of cancer. Statins are first-line cholesterol-lowering medications in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Several studies have demonstrated a relationship between statin use and reduced cancer incidence. We examined the cancer benefits of statin subtypes, with specific attention to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This retrospective review included adults with T2DM diagnosed with solid tumors at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, NY, USA (2003-2010). Individuals with gestational diabetes, incomplete records, or diagnosed with rare solid tumors were excluded. Follow-up began at the date of diagnosis and ended with the first confirmed recurrence, death, or loss of contact. Demographics were assessed by Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, and Cox proportional hazards regression.

FINDINGS

Overall, 1102 patients met inclusion criteria, 52.1% of the study participants were female, and 578 participants (52.5%) died during the follow-up period which ranged from 0 to 156 months. Hydrophilic statin use was associated with improved DFS at 5-year follow-up (41.0% vs. 36.9%, P = 0.0077) compared to lipophilic statin use. Multivariate regression revealed that hydrophilic statins were associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.706, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.526-0.947) and OS (HR: 0.685, 95% CI: 0.503-0.934). Pravastatin was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.674, 95% CI: 0.471-0.964).

CONCLUSION

In patients with T2DM and cancer, hydrophilic statins, and pravastatin in particular, are associated with improved DFS as well as OS. Further research examining the cancer-specific effects of hydrophilic and lipophilic statins is needed to better understand their beneficial effects.