1
|
Holzgreve A, Hellwig D, Barthel H, Beer AJ, Kobe C, Lapa C, Miederer M, Schwarzenböck S, Seifert R, Todica A, Herrmann K, Bengel FM, Schäfers M, Moka D, Luster M, Fendler WP. PET imaging utilization and trends in Germany: a comprehensive survey. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07323-x. [PMID: 40317303 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07323-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2025] [Accepted: 04/28/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION PET imaging is a key diagnostic procedure in clinical routine worldwide. While public figures on PET volume are available in many countries, until now these numbers were not publicly known for Germany. METHODS On behalf of the PET committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, we conducted a comprehensive survey among PET centers in Germany to collect data on PET imaging, including the total PET volume and indication groups. RESULTS National total PET volume in 2021 was 154,400 scans (94% PET/CT, 6% PET/MRI). PET volume in 2021 normalized to total population was lower in Germany (1,857 scans per 1 million inhabitants) when compared to public figures from France (10,182 scans), Belgium (9,866 scans), or Italy (4,312 scans). PET volume in Germany demonstrated significant growth 2017 to 2021 (+ 48%). Top three indication fields were oncological (re)staging (76%), theranostic (13%), and neurology (4%). The top three indications were lung cancer (31%), prostate cancer (16%), and lymphoma/leukemia (12%). The top three radiotracers used were [18F]FDG (75%), PSMA radioligands (17%), and somatostatin-receptor radioligands (8%). CONCLUSIONS Clinical adoption of PET imaging in Germany is behind compared to Italy, France, and Belgium. However, newly established outpatient reimbursement seems to contribute to recent growth in PET volume. We observe considerable shift towards theranostic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Dirk Hellwig
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Henryk Barthel
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leipzig University Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ambros J Beer
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Constantin Lapa
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Translational Imaging in Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC) Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, University of Technology Dresden (TUD), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Schwarzenböck
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Robert Seifert
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrei Todica
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DIE RADIOLOGIE, Munich, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Frank M Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael Schäfers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Markus Luster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoyek NE, Shi X, Jenkins J, Chen W. Role of PSMA PET/CT in imaging and management of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2025; 37:233-239. [PMID: 40065665 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000001131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the era of precision medicine, the introduction of FDA-approved prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting tracers has revolutionized prostate cancer imaging. These tracers enable functional positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, allowing for precise identification of the location and extent of prostate cancer spread. This review serves as a practical guide for multidisciplinary teams caring for prostate cancer patients, outlining the current approved uses of PET imaging with PSMA tracers and exploring its future applications. RECENT FINDINGS PSMA PET/CT has become a reliable modality for initial staging in patients with intermediate-to-high risk prostate cancer, restaging in cases of biochemical recurrence and further clarifying disease status among patients with conventional imaging based nonmetastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer and metastatic prostate cancer. Additionally, it has promising roles in selecting patients for radioligand therapy, monitoring treatment response, and guiding therapeutic decision-making. SUMMARY PSMA PET/CT is currently a crucial imaging tool used at key stages of prostate cancer management, with ongoing research exploring its potential for additional clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaolei Shi
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jason Jenkins
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
| | - Wengen Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Di Giorgio A, Siepe G, Serani F, Di Franco M, Malizia C, Castellucci P, Fanti S, Farolfi A. Long-term outcomes of PSMA PET/CT-guided radiotherapy in biochemical failure patients post-radical prostatectomy: a 5-year follow-up analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07255-6. [PMID: 40186765 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07255-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2025] [Accepted: 03/31/2025] [Indexed: 04/07/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of PSMA PET/CT-guided salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in improving long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) or PSA persistence (PERS) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 100 patients with BCR or PERS after RP who underwent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and sRT according to EAU guidelines. The primary endpoint was bRFS (PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml). RESULTS Sixty-three patients had BCR and 37 had PERS. Fifteen patients had PSA pre-RT < 0.5 ng/ml, while 75 had PSA pre-RT ≥ 0.5 ng/ml. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was positive in 52 patients, with BCR patients more frequently exhibiting local recurrence while PERS patients showed more nodal involvement. Patients with PERS received sRT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in 57% of cases. The hazard ratio (HR) of treatment failure for patients with PSA pre-RT ≥ 0.5 ng/ml vs. < 0.5 ng/ml was 2.2 (p < 0.039). With a median follow-up of 59 months, treatment failure occurred in 36% of patients, with no difference between BCR and PERS groups. Among those with treatment failure, 64% were [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT positive at recurrence, and 39% received a new PSMA PET/CT-based RT. All patients were alive at the last analysis. CONCLUSION [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-guided sRT demonstrates significant long-term efficacy in patients with BCR or PERS after RP, leading to durable PSA response and guiding further treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION 244/2016/O/Oss8 November 2016 retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Giorgio
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Martina Di Franco
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Claudio Malizia
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cózar Santiago M, García Garzón J, Esteban Hurtado A, Pastor Peiro J, Ferrer Rebolleda J. Clinical value of a negative [ 18F]F-PSMA PET/CT study in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with PSA rising below 1 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy, on the outcome of salvage radiotherapy. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2025; 44:500071. [PMID: 39827986 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2025.500071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical value of [18F]F-PSMA negative PET/CT, in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with elevated PSA less than 1 ng/mL, on the outcome of salvage radiotherapy. METHOD We prospectively included 98 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy with biochemical recurrence [mean PSA 0.51 ng/mL (range 0.17-1.0 ng/mL)] who were referred for an [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT study. The [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT scan was negative in 53/98 patients (54.09%). Differences were analysed between those patients who were or were not candidates for pelvic salvage radiotherapy (PSRT) decided upon multidisciplinary committee and patient consent, with a minimum follow-up time for 1 year. Response to treatment was defined as a 50% reduction in PSA levels. Recurrence was ascertained upon clinical, analytical and imaging follow-up outcomes. RESULTS 54.7% (29/53) of the patients with a negative [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT underwent PSRT. Of these, 93.1% (27/29) patients demonstrated response to treatment (PSMA false negatives). The remaining two patients showed fluctuating PSA levels without detecting disease on the [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study. 45.3% (24/53) of patients with negative [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT did not undergo PSRT. Of these, progressive PSA elevation was observed in 62.5% (15/24) (PSMA false negatives), localising recurrence on the [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study in 4 patients. The remaining 9 patients (37.5%) showed fluctuating PSA levels without detecting disease on the [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT follow-up study. Our series confirmed 42 (42.85%) [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT false negatives cases. CONCLUSION Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer with post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence and a negative [18F]F-PSMA -PET/CT study are likely to benefit from pelvic salvage radiotherapy, with response seen in 93.1% of our cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Cózar Santiago
- ASCIRES-Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - J García Garzón
- Unidad PET/TC CETIR-ASCIRES, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Esteban Hurtado
- ASCIRES-Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - J Ferrer Rebolleda
- ASCIRES-Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amseian G, Figueras M, Mases J, Mengual L, Ribal MJ, Quintero K, Pages R, Ingelmo-Torres M, Roldan FL, Caratini R, Fuster D, Alcaraz A, Izquierdo L, Paredes P. cfDNA fragmentation patterns correlate with tumor burden measured via PSMA PET/CT volumetric parameters in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res 2024; 14:124. [PMID: 39694939 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01170-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2024] [Accepted: 11/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer recurrence following primary treatment poses a significant clinical challenge, particularly when detected through biochemical recurrence at low PSA levels. Conventional imaging modalities often fail to localize the disease at this early stage. PSMA PET has demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting recurrent lesions, even in patients with low PSA. Concurrently, liquid biopsy, through analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), offers a minimally invasive approach for monitoring disease. There is scarce evidence about the association between liquid biopsy and PSMA PET/CT findings. This study aimed to assess the correlation between liquid biopsy and tumor burden assessed by PSMA PET/CT in early recurring prostate cancer patients. RESULTS PSMA PET/CT and liquid biopsies of 32 patients in biochemical recurrence were analyzed. 12 patients (37.5%) had no PSMA PET-measurable disease. Four patients (12.5%) presented local recurrence, seven (21.9%) had recurrence in pelvic lymph nodes, one of whom also had local recurrence. Nine patients (28.1%) presented metastatic recurrence, with or without local or nodal recurrence. PSA levels correlated with molecular imaging data (p < 0.05), including whole body PSMA-TV, whole body PSMA-TL, whole body SUVmean and whole body SUVmax. The mean cfDNA fragment size fraction was inversely correlated with tumour burden measured with whole body PSMA-TV, with a Spearman correlation coefficient of -0.451 and a p-value of 0.009. No correlation was found between cfDNA concentration and PET-PSMA data. CONCLUSION This prospective study demonstrated a statistically significant negative correlation between cfDNA fragmentation patterns and PSMA PET/CT volumetric parameters in patients with presumed localized prostate cancer with early biochemical recurrence. These findings underscore the potential of liquid biopsy as a biomarker and a complementary tool to PSMA PET/CT to assess disease progression during the follow-up of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Amseian
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marcel Figueras
- Department and Laboratory of Urology, Urology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Genetics and Urological Tumours, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joel Mases
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lourdes Mengual
- Department and Laboratory of Urology, Urology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Genetics and Urological Tumours, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria-Jose Ribal
- Department and Laboratory of Urology, Urology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Katherine Quintero
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rita Pages
- Department and Laboratory of Urology, Urology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mercedes Ingelmo-Torres
- Department and Laboratory of Urology, Urology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Genetics and Urological Tumours, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Fiorella-Lizzeth Roldan
- Department and Laboratory of Urology, Urology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Genetics and Urological Tumours, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rocío Caratini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Fuster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Alcaraz
- Department and Laboratory of Urology, Urology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain
- Genetics and Urological Tumours, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Surgery and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Izquierdo
- Department and Laboratory of Urology, Urology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
- Genetics and Urological Tumours, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
- Department of Surgery and Medical Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Pilar Paredes
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zamboglou C, Staus P, Wolkewitz M, Peeken JC, Ferentinos K, Strouthos I, Farolfi A, Koerber SA, Vrachimis A, Spohn SKB, Aebersold DM, Grosu AL, Kroeze SGC, Fanti S, Hruby G, Wiegel T, Emmett L, Hayoz S, Ceci F, Guckenberger M, Belka C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Ghadjar P, Shelan M. Better Oncological Outcomes After Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-guided Salvage Radiotherapy Following Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00247-5. [PMID: 39609244 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2024] [Revised: 10/08/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Up to 50% of patients with prostate cancer experience prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse following primary radical prostatectomy (RP). Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly being used for staging after RP owing to its high detection rate. Our aim was to compare outcomes for patients who received salvage radiotherapy (sRT) with versus without PSMA PET guidance. METHODS In this observational case-control study, the control group consisted of 344 patients from the SAKK09/10 trial (sRT without PSMA PET guidance from 2011 to 2014). The treatment group consisted of 1548 patients from a retrospective multicenter cohort (PSMA PET-guided sRT from July 2013 to 2020). Data were collected up to November 2023. Patients with pN1 status at RP, initial cM1 status, cM1 status on PET, or PSA >0.5 ng/ml were excluded. Patients with detectable PSA after RP who were treated with sRT were eligible. We assessed 3-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The study population of 717 patients comprised a control group (n = 255) with median follow-up of 75 mo and a PSMA PET group (n = 462) with median follow-up of 31 mo. In the PSMA PET cohort, 103 patients (22.3%) had PSMA-positive pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs), 85 (18.4%) received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and 104 (22.5%) underwent PLN irradiation. The BRFS rate at 3 yr was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64-78%) for the control group and 77% (95% CI 72-82%) for the PSMA PET group. The PSMA PET group had favorable BRFS at 18-24 mo after sRT (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% CI 0.0.14-0.75; p = 0.01) and a lower rate of lymph node relapse after sRT (standardized mean difference 0.603). The MFS rate at 3 yr was 89.2% (95% CI 84.6-94.1%) for the control group and 91.2% (95% CI 88.1-94.4%) for the PSMA PET group. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Our results suggest a moderate improvement in short-term BRFS if PSMA PET is used to guide sRT. One possible reason is individualized PLN coverage facilitated by PET. MFS was not improved by PSMA PET guidance for sRT. PATIENTS' SUMMARY For patients who experience recurrence of prostate cancer after surgical removal of their prostate, salvage radiotherapy (sRT) is a further treatment option. We found that a type of scan called PSMA PET (prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography) to identify recurrence and guide sRT can improve recurrence-free survival because of better targeting of pelvic lymph nodes that may contain cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Freiburg Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Paulina Staus
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Methods in Clinical Epidemiology Division, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Wolkewitz
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Methods in Clinical Epidemiology Division, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jan C Peeken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum, Munich, Germany; Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung, Munich Partner Site, Munich, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Ferentinos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Iosif Strouthos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexis Vrachimis
- CARIC Cancer Research and Innovation Center, Limassol, Cyprus; Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Freiburg Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Freiburg Partner Site, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Stephanie G C Kroeze
- Department of Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia; St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stefanie Hayoz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research Competence Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meijer D, van Leeuwen PJ, Eppinga WS, Vanneste BG, Meijnen P, Daniels LA, van den Bergh RC, Lont AP, Bodar YJ, Ettema RH, de Bie KC, Oudshoorn FH, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, van der Poel HG, Donswijk ML, Heymans MW, Oprea-Lager DE, Schaake EE, Vis AN. Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Nomogram Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients without Metastases on Restaging Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 61:37-43. [PMID: 38384437 PMCID: PMC10879939 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Owing to the greater use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), patient selection for local salvage radiation therapy (sRT) has changed. Our objective was to determine the short-term efficacy of sRT in patients with BCR after RARP, and to develop a novel nomogram predicting BCR-free survival after sRT in a nationwide contemporary cohort of patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT before sRT for BCR of PCa, without evidence of metastatic disease. Methods All 302 eligible patients undergoing PCa sRT in four reference centers between September 2015 and August 2020 were included. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis using a backward elimination procedure to develop a nomogram for predicting biochemical progression of PCa, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.2 ng/ml above the post-sRT nadir within 1 yr after sRT. Key findings and limitations Biochemical progression of disease within 1 yr after sRT was observed for 56/302 (19%) of the study patients. The final predictive model included PSA at sRT initiation, pathological grade group, surgical margin status, PSA doubling time, presence of local recurrence on PSMA PET/CT, and the presence of biochemical persistence (first PSA result ≥0.1 ng/ml) after RARP. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for this model was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.79). Using our nomogram, patients with a predicted risk of >20% had a 30.8% chance of developing biochemical progression within 1 yr after sRT. Conclusions Our novel nomogram may facilitate better patient counseling regarding early oncological outcome after sRT. Patients with high risk of biochemical progression may be candidates for more extensive treatment. Patient summary We developed a new tool for predicting cancer control outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with recurrence of prostate cancer after surgical removal of their prostate. This tool may help in better counseling of these patients with recurrent cancer regarding their early expected outcome after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietse S.C. Eppinga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philip Meijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laurien A. Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne P. Lont
- Department of Urology, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Yves J.L. Bodar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosemarijn H. Ettema
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katelijne C.C. de Bie
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jakko A. Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L. Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W. Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva E. Schaake
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Weiner AB, Agrawal R, Valle LF, Sonni I, Kishan AU, Rettig MB, Raman SS, Calais J, Boutros PC, Reiter RE. Impact of PSMA PET on Prostate Cancer Management. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:191-205. [PMID: 38270802 PMCID: PMC11034977 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01181-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT PSMA-PET has been a practice-changing imaging biomarker for the management of men with PCa. Research suggests improved accuracy over conventional imaging and other PET radiotracers in many contexts. With multiple approved PSMA-targeting radiotracers, PSMA PET will become even more available in clinical practice. Its increased use requires an understanding of the prospective data available and caution when extrapolating from prior trial data that utilized other imaging modalities. Future trials leveraging PSMA PET for treatment optimization and management decision-making will ultimately drive its clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam B Weiner
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Raag Agrawal
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Luca F Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ida Sonni
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew B Rettig
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Steven S Raman
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul C Boutros
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Institute for Precision Health, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is a significant health concern worldwide, with high incidence and mortality rates. Early and accurate detection and localization of recurrent disease at biochemical recurrence (BCR) is critical for guiding subsequent therapeutic decisions and improving patient outcomes. At BCR, conventional imaging consisting of CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy are recommended by US and European guidelines, however, these modalities all bear certain limitations in detecting metastatic disease, particularly in low-volume relapse at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Molecular imaging with PET/CT or PET/MRI using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting radiopharmaceuticals has revolutionized imaging of PC. Particularly at BCR PC, PSMA PET has shown better diagnostic performance compared to conventional imaging in detecting local relapse and metastases, even at very low PSA levels. The most recent version of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline has included PSMA-targeted PET/CT or PET/MRI for the localization of BCR PC. There are several different PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceuticals labeled with different radioisotopes, each with slightly different characteristics, but overall similar high sensitivity and specificity for PC. PSMA-targeted PET has the potential to significantly impact patient care by guiding personalized treatment decisions and thus improving outcomes in BCR PC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heying Duan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huls SJ, Burkett B, Ehman E, Lowe VJ, Subramaniam RM, Kendi AT. Clinical practice in prostate PET imaging. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231213618. [PMID: 38028142 PMCID: PMC10666681 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231213618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer has advanced significantly in the past decade with prostate cancer targeted radiopharmaceuticals now playing a growing role in diagnosis, staging, and treatment. This narrative review focuses on the most commonly used PET radiopharmaceuticals in the USA: prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), fluciclovine, and choline. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is used in many other malignancies, but rarely in prostate cancer. Previous literature is discussed regarding each radiopharmaceutical's utility in the settings of screening/diagnosis, initial staging, biochemical recurrence, advanced disease, and evaluation prior to targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy and radiation therapy. PET imaging has demonstrated utility over traditional imaging in various scenarios; however, there are few head-to-head studies comparing PET radiopharmaceuticals. PSMA radiopharmaceuticals are the newest tracers developed and have unique properties and uses, especially at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. However, each PET radiopharmaceutical has different properties which can affect image interpretation. Choline and fluciclovine have minimal urinary activity, whereas PSMA agents can have high urinary activity which may affect locoregional disease evaluation. Of the three radiopharmaceuticals, only PSMA is approved for both diagnostic and therapeutic indications with 177Lu-PSMA. A variety of diagnostic PET radiotracers for prostate cancer allows for increased flexibility, especially in the setting of supply chain and medication shortages. For the time being, keeping a diverse group of PET radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer is justifiable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean J. Huls
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester MN 55905, USA
| | - Brian Burkett
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eric Ehman
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Val J. Lowe
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rathan M. Subramaniam
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Medical School, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - A. Tuba Kendi
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ojeda-Claro AV, Ledo-Cepero MJ, Álvarez-Ossorio JL. ¿Is CRPC definition still valid in the new era of antiandrogens for mHSPC treatment? Actas Urol Esp 2023; 47:543-545. [PMID: 37094627 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A V Ojeda-Claro
- Unidad de Uro-Oncología, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
| | - M J Ledo-Cepero
- Unidad de Uro-Oncología, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| | - J L Álvarez-Ossorio
- Unidad de Uro-Oncología, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barletta F, Ceci F, van den Bergh RCN, Rajwa P, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Gandaglia G. The role of nuclear medicine tracers for prostate cancer surgery: from preoperative to intraoperative setting. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:502-509. [PMID: 37530704 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There has been a growing interest in the use of novel molecular imaging modalities for the management of prostate cancer (PCa), spanning from diagnostic to therapeutic settings. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of recently published studies investigating the use of novel nuclear medicine tracers across different stages of PCa management. RECENT FINDINGS Emerging evidence supports the use of molecular imaging for preoperative staging of PCa, where prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has shown superior accuracy compared to conventional imaging for the detection of nodal and distant metastases, which needs to be translated to new risk stratification. A role for PSMA PET has been proposed for PCa diagnosis, with local activity associated with histology. Surgical guidance, using either visual feedback or gamma-ray detectors to identify tissues with accumulated radio-labeled tracers, may improve the ability to resect locoregional diseases and thus maximize oncological control. PSMA targeted therapy (Lu-PSMA) has been mainly investigated in the castration-resistant setting, but might have a role in earlier settings such as neoadjuvant treatment. SUMMARY Novel molecular imaging using PSMA-based tracers could significantly improve PCa management in the diagnosis, staging, and intraoperative guidance settings, potentially leading to personalized and effective treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sadaghiani MS, Sheikhbahaei S, Al-Zaghal A, Solnes LB, Pomper MG, Oldan JD, Ulaner GA, Gorin MA, Rowe SP. Detection of Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer with [ 18F]DCFPyL PET/CT: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with a Focus on Correlations with Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen Parameters. Tomography 2023; 9:1504-1514. [PMID: 37624113 PMCID: PMC10459480 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9040120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
[18F]DCFPyL is increasingly used for prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) mediated imaging of men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BRPCa). In this meta-analysis, which is updated with the addition of multiple new studies, including the definitive phase III CONDOR trial, we discuss the detection efficiency of [18F]DCFPyL in BRPCa patients. PubMed was searched on 29 September 2022. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of [18F]DCFPyL among patients with BRPCa were included. The overall pooled detection rate with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated among all included studies and stratified among patients with PSA ≥ 2 vs. <2 ng/mL and with PSA ≥ 0.5 vs. <0.5 ng/mL. The association of detection efficiency with pooled PSA doubling time from two studies was calculated. Seventeen manuscripts, including 2252 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were used for data extraction. A previous meta-analysis reported that the pooled detection rate was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85), while our study showed a pooled overall detection rate of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66-0.79). An increased proportion of positive scans were found in patients with PSA ≥ 2 vs. <2 ng/mL and PSA ≥ 0.5 vs. <0.5 ng/mL. No significant difference was found in detection efficiency between those with PSA doubling time ≥ 12 vs. <12 months. Detection efficiency is statistically related to serum PSA levels but not to PSA doubling time based on available data. The detection efficiency of [18F]DCFPyL in men with BRPCa has trended down since a previous meta-analysis, which may reflect increasingly stringent inclusion criteria for studies over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad S. Sadaghiani
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Sara Sheikhbahaei
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Abdullah Al-Zaghal
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Lilja B. Solnes
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Martin G. Pomper
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Jorge D. Oldan
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Gary A. Ulaner
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Irvine, CA 92633, USA
- Departments of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
- Department of Translational Genomics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Michael A. Gorin
- Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Steven P. Rowe
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sonni I, Dal Pra A, O'Connell DP, Ells Z, Benz M, Nguyen K, Yoon SM, Deng J, Smith C, Grogan T, Nickols NG, Cao M, Kishan AU, Calais J. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-Based Atlas for Prostate Bed Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Salvage Radiation Therapy Contouring Guidelines. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:902-909. [PMID: 36759200 PMCID: PMC10241009 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the patterns of prostate bed (PB) recurrence in prostate cancer patients experiencing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence (BCP) or biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA PET) in relation to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical target volumes (CTVs). Methods: This single-center, retrospective analysis included patients with BCP or BCR after radical prostatectomy and PB recurrence on 68Ga-PSMA PET. The PB recurrences were delineated by nuclear medicine physicians, the CTVs by radiation oncologists contouring guidelines on the 68Ga-PSMA PET, respectively, masked from each other. The coverage of the 68Ga-PSMA PET recurrence was categorized as PSMA recurrence completely covered, partially covered, or not covered by the RTOG-based CTV. Further, we evaluated the differences in PSMA recurrence patterns among patients with different 68Ga-PSMA PET staging (miTNM). Mann-Whitney U tests, the chi-square test, and Spearman (ρ) correlation analysis were used to investigate associations between CTV coverage and 68Ga-PSMA PET-based tumor volume, serum PSA levels, miTNM, and rectal/bladder involvement. Results: A total of 226 patients were included in the analysis; 127 patients had PSMA recurrence limited to the PB (miTrN0M0), 30 had pelvic nodal disease (miTrN1M0), 32 had extrapelvic disease (miTrN0M1), and 37 had both pelvic nodal disease and extrapelvic disease (miTrN1M1). In the miTrN0M0 cohort, the recurrence involved the rectal and bladder walls in 12 of 127 (9%) and 4 of 127 (3%), respectively. The PSMA-positive PB recurrences were completely covered by the CTV in 68 of 127 patients (53%), partially covered in 43 of 127 (34%), and not covered in 16 of 127 (13%). Full coverage was associated with a smaller tumor volume (P = 0.043), a lack of rectal/bladder wall involvement (P = 0.03), and lower miTNM staging (P = 0.035) but not with lower serum PSA levels (P = 0.979). Conclusion: Our study suggests that 68Ga-PSMA PET can be a valuable tool for guiding salvage radiation therapy (SRT) planning directed to the PB in the setting of postoperative BCR or BCP. These data should be incorporated into the redefinition of PB contouring guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Sonni
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California;
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Dylan P O'Connell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Zachary Ells
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Matthias Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Kathleen Nguyen
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stephanie M Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jie Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Clayton Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tristan Grogan
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - Nickolas G Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Veteran Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tilki D, Chen MH, Wu J, Huland H, Graefen M, Mohamad O, Cowan JE, Feng FY, Carroll PR, D'Amico AV. Prostate-Specific Antigen Level at the Time of Salvage Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Death. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2428-2435. [PMID: 36857638 PMCID: PMC10150889 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Both the performance characteristics of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and insurance approval improves with increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level causing some physicians to delay post-radical prostatectomy salvage radiation therapy (sRT) after PSA failure. Yet, it is unknown for men with at most one high-risk factor (ie, pT3/4 or prostatectomy [p] Gleason score 8-10) whether a PSA level exists above which initiating sRT is associated with increased all-cause mortality (ACM)-risk and was investigated. METHODS Using a multinational database of 25,551 patients with pT2-4N0 or NXM0 prostate cancer, multivariable Cox regression analysis evaluated whether an association with a significant increase in ACM-risk existed when sRT was delivered above a prespecified PSA level beginning at 0.10 ng/mL and in 0.05 increments up to 0.50 ng/mL versus at or below that level. The model was adjusted for age at and year of radical prostatectomy, established prostate cancer prognostic factors, institution, and the time-dependent use of androgen deprivation therapy. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 6.00 years, patients who received sRT at a PSA level >0.25 ng/mL had a significantly higher ACM-risk (AHR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.00; P = .008) compared with men who received sRT when the PSA was ≤0.25 mg/mL. This elevated ACM-risk remained significant for all PSA cutpoints up to 0.50 ng/mL but was not significant at PSA cutpoint values below 0.25 ng/mL. CONCLUSION Among patients with at most one high-risk factor, initiating sRT above a PSA level of 0.25 ng/mL was associated with increased ACM-risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ming-Hui Chen
- Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
| | - Jing Wu
- Department of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Janet E. Cowan
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Felix Y. Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Anthony V. D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, Cho SY, Fanti S, Giesel FL, Goffin K, Haberkorn U, Jacene H, Koo PJ, Kopka K, Krause BJ, Lindenberg L, Marcus C, Mottaghy FM, Oprea-Lager DE, Osborne JR, Piert M, Rowe SP, Schöder H, Wan S, Wester HJ, Hope TA, Herrmann K. PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1466-1486. [PMID: 36604326 PMCID: PMC10027805 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06089-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 169] [Impact Index Per Article: 84.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Here we aim to provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. Procedures and characteristics are reported for a variety of available PSMA small radioligands. Different scenarios for the clinical use of PSMA-ligand PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence, to support the implementation of PSMA PET/CT imaging in research and routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging & Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Steve Y Cho
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Frederik L Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Leuven, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heather Jacene
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Charles Marcus
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Morand Piert
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Walther-Meißner-Str. 3, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bianchi L, Ceci F, Balestrazzi E, Costa F, Droghetti M, Piazza P, Pissavini A, Presutti M, Farolfi A, Mei R, Castellucci P, Gandaglia G, Larcher A, Robesti D, Mottrie A, Briganti A, Morganti AG, Fanti S, Montorsi F, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E. PSMA-PET Guided Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients with Oligorecurrent Progression after Previous Salvage Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072027. [PMID: 37046687 PMCID: PMC10093227 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is used to select recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients for metastases-directed therapy (MDT). We aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of second-line PSMA-guided MDT in oligo-recurrent PCa patients. Methods: we performed a retrospective analysis of 113 recurrent PCa after previous radical prostatectomy and salvage therapies with oligorecurrent disease at PSMA-PET (≤3 lesions in N1/M1a-b) in three high-volume European centres. Patients underwent second-line salvage treatments: MDT targeted to PSMA (including surgery and/or radiotherapy), and the conventional approach (observation or Androgen Deprivation Therapy [ADT]). Patients were stratified according to treatments (MDT vs. conventional approach). Patients who underwent MDT were stratified according to stage in PSMA-PET (N1 vs. M1a-b). The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant PCa free survival (CRPC-FS). Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS. Multivariable Cox regression models identified predictors of progression and metastatic disease. Results: Overall, 91 (80%) and 22 (20%) patients were treated with MDT and the conventional approach, respectively. The median follow-up after PSMA-PET was 31 months. Patients who underwent MDT had a similar PFS compared to the conventional approach (p = 0.3). Individuals referred to MDT had significantly higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to those who were treated with the conventional approach (73.5% and 94.7% vs. 30.5% and 79.5%; all p ≤ 0.001). In patients undergoing MDT, no significant differences were found for PFS and MFS according to N1 vs. M1a-b disease, while CRPC-FS estimates were significantly higher in patients with N1 vs. M1a-b (100% vs. 86.1%; p = 0.02). At multivariable analyses, age (HR = 0.96) and ADT during second line salvage treatment (HR = 0.5) were independent predictors of PFS; MDT (HR 0.27) was the only independent predictor of MFS (all p ≤ 0.04) Conclusion: Patients who underwent second-line PSMA-guided MDT experienced higher MFS and CRPC-FS compared to men who received conventional management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Eleonora Balestrazzi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Costa
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pissavini
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Presutti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mei
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, 9090 Melle, Belgium
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Division, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:128-136. [PMID: 36804735 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) had a substantial impact on the management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a stage migration phenomenon and consequent treatment changes. OBJECTIVE To summarise the role of PSMA-PET to define the burden of disease through an accurate location of metastatic site(s) in PCa patients, describing the most common locations at PSMA-PET in the primary staging and recurrence setting, and to assess the clinical impact in the decision-making process. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive nonsystematic literature review was performed in April 2022. Literature search was updated until March 2022. The most relevant studies have been summarised, giving priority to registered clinical trials and multicentre collaborations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS PSMA-PET showed higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional imaging both in newly diagnosed PCa and in recurrent disease. This greater accuracy led to a migration of a higher proportion of patients identified with metastatic disease. Bone metastases were reported as the most frequent site of metastatic spread in staging (up to 17%) and restaging (up to 18%). In staging, considering the suboptimal sensitivity in lymph node metastasis detection prior to radical surgery, PSMA-PET should be performed in patients with high risk or unfavourable intermediate risk only, and it is not recommended to routinely avoid pelvic lymph node dissection in case of a negative scan. In case of prostate-specific antigen relapse, PSMA-PET had higher diagnostic accuracy than other diagnostic procedures in the early detection of the sites of recurrence, thus influencing the therapy decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET detects a higher number of lesions than conventional imaging or other PET radiotracers, especially metastatic lesions unseen with other modalities. The high diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET leads to a significant patient upstage and thus an impact in clinical management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) identifies metastatic lesions with higher accuracy than conventional imaging, both in primary prostate cancer and during disease recurrence. Skeletal metastasis and extrapelvic lymph nodes are the most common sites of metastatic spread. The high accuracy of PSMA-PET in the detection of metastatic disease led to a significant impact on patient management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Petit C, Delouya G, Taussky D, Barkati M, Lambert C, Beauchemin MC, Clavel S, Mok G, Paré ASG, Nguyen TV, Duplan D, Keu KV, Saad F, Juneau D, Ménard C. PSMA-PET/CT-Guided Intensification of Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer (PSMAgRT): Findings of Detection Rate, Effect on Cancer Management, and Early Toxicity From a Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00006-8. [PMID: 36639035 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand positron emission tomography (PET) is increasingly integrated in prostate cancer management because of its diagnostic performance. We sought to evaluate the effect of PSMA-PET/computed tomography (CT)-guided intensification of radiation therapy (PSMAgRT) on patient outcomes. Here, we report secondary trial endpoints including the rate of new lesion detection, effect on prostate cancer management, and treatment-related toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this phase 2 cohort multiple randomized controlled trial across 2 institutions, men with prostate cancer planned for RT were randomly selected for PSMAgRT across 4 strata: oligometastatic, high risk (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment ≥6 or cN1), salvage post-RT, and salvage postprostatectomy (RP). Primary endpoint was failure-free survival at 5 years, with analysis pending further follow-up. Secondary endpoints included new lesion detection yield of PSMA-PET/CT, acute and delayed toxicities, effect on prostate cancer management, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03525288, companion to registry NCT03378856. RESULTS Between May 2018 and February 2021, 262 patients were enrolled and randomized. Nine patients were later excluded (5 control, 4 PSMAgRT), leaving 253 patients for analysis (23 oligometastatic, 86 high risk, 16 salvage post-RT, and 128 salvage post-RP). New lesions were detected in 45.5% of oligometastatic, 39.5% of high risk, 14.3% of salvage post-RT, and 51.6% of salvage post-RP. Overall, PSMA-PET/CT led to intensification of RT in over half of patients (52.0%), with minimal intensification of systemic therapy (4.0%). With a median follow-up of 12.9 months, this intensification was associated with 3 attributable grade 3+ events (2.5% of patients undergoing PSMAgRT) but no difference in the rate of grade 2+ events attributable to RT compared with controls (43%, both arms). CONCLUSIONS In this randomized trial, PSMA-PET/CT led to intensification of RT in more than half of patients. Longer follow-up is required to determine whether this intensification translates to effect on cancer control and long-term toxicity and health-related quality-of-life outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Petit
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Guila Delouya
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Daniel Taussky
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Maroie Barkati
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Carole Lambert
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marie-Claude Beauchemin
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sebastien Clavel
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Gary Mok
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Anne-Sophie Gauthier Paré
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Thu-van Nguyen
- Département de radio-oncologie, Hôpital de Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, Québec, Canada
| | - Danny Duplan
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Khun Visith Keu
- Département d'imagerie médicale, service de médecine nucléaire, Hôpital de la Cité-de-la-Santé, Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Département d'urologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Daniel Juneau
- Département de médecine nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Cynthia Ménard
- Département de radio-oncologie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bianchi L, Ceci F, Costa F, Balestrazzi E, Droghetti M, Piazza P, Pissavini A, Mei R, Farolfi A, Castellucci P, Puliatti S, Larcher A, Gandaglia G, Robesti D, Mottrie A, Briganti A, Morganti AG, Fanti S, Montorsi F, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E. The Impact of PSMA-PET on Oncologic Control in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Experienced PSA Persistence or Recurrence. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010247. [PMID: 36612242 PMCID: PMC9818949 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is currently recommended to restage prostate cancer (PCa) and to guide the delivery of salvage treatments. We aim to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients with recurrent PCa who received PSMA-PET. Methods: 324 hormone-sensitive PCa with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy who underwent PSMA-PET in three high-volume European Centres. Patients have been stratified as pre-salvage who never received salvage treatments (n = 134), and post-salvage, including patients who received previous salvage therapies (n = 190). Patients with oligorecurrent (≤3 lesions), PSMA-positive disease underwent PSMA-directed treatments: salvage radiotherapy (sRT) or Metastases-directed therapy (MDT). Patients with polirecurrent (>3 lesions) PSMA-positive disease were treated with systemic therapy. Patients with negative PSMA-PET were treated with sRT or systemic therapies or observation. The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were: Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant Pca free survival (CRPC-FS). Results: median follow up was 23 months. In the pre-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 66.2% vs. 38.9%, 95.2% vs. 73.7% and 94.9% vs. 93.1% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≥ 0.2). In the post-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 59.5% vs. 29.1%, 92.7% vs. 65.1% and 98.8% vs. 88.8% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≤ 0.01). At multivariable analyses, a positive PSMA-PET was an independent predictor of progression (HR = 2.15) and metastatic disease (HR 2.37; all p ≤ 0.03). Conclusion: PSMA-PET in recurrent PCa detects the site of recurrence guiding salvage treatments and has a prognostic role in patients who received previous salvage treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Costa
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Balestrazzi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pissavini
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mei
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41122 Modena, Italy
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, 9300 Melle, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, 9300 Aalst, Belgium
- ORSI Academy, 9300 Melle, Belgium
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Roberts MJ, Chatfield MD, Hruby G, Nandurkar R, Roach P, Watts JA, Cusick T, Kneebone A, Eade T, Ho B, Nguyen A, Tang C, McCarthy M, Francis R, Stricker P, Emmett L. Event-free survival after radical prostatectomy according to prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography and European Association of Urology biochemical recurrence risk groups. BJU Int 2022; 130 Suppl 3:32-39. [PMID: 35488182 PMCID: PMC9796546 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess European Association of Urology (EAU) risk groups for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer relative to prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) status and oncological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective analysis of a study that incorporated PSMA-PET for men with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) was undertaken. EAU risk groups were considered relative to clinical variables, PSMA-PET findings, and deployment of salvage radiotherapy (SRT). The primary oncological outcome was event-free survival (EFS) and this was analysed relative to clinical and imaging variables. An 'event' occurred if prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level rose >0.2 ng/mL above nadir or additional therapies were introduced. RESULTS A total of 137 patients were included, most of whom had EAU high-risk disease (76%) and/or low PSA levels (80% <0.5 ng/mL) at the time of PSMA-PET. EAU risk group was not associated with regional nodal/distant metastasis on PSMA-PET. Regional nodal/distant metastasis on PSMA PET (compared to negative/local recurrence: hazard ratio [HR] 2.2; P = 0.002) and SRT use (vs no SRT: HR 0.44; P = 0.004) were associated with EFS. EAU high-risk status was not significantly associated with worse EFS (HR 1.7, P = 0.12) compared to EAU low-risk status. Among patients who received SRT, both regional/distant metastasis on PSMA-PET (HR 3.1; P < 0.001) and EAU high-risk status (HR 2.9; P = 0.04) were independently associated with worse EFS, which was driven by patients in the EAU high-risk group with regional/distant metastases (38%; HR 3.1, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with post-RP BCR, PSMA-PET findings and receipt of SRT predicted EFS. In patients receiving SRT, PSMA status combined with EAU risk grouping was most predictive of EFS. These findings suggest that the EAU risk groups could be improved with the addition of PSMA-PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Roberts
- Department of UrologyRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalBrisbaneQLDAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical ResearchBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - Mark D. Chatfield
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Queensland Centre for Clinical ResearchBrisbaneQLDAustralia
| | - George Hruby
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia,Genesis Cancer CareSydneyNSWAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Rohan Nandurkar
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Paul Roach
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia,Department of Nuclear MedicineRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Jo Anne Watts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine/WA PET ServicesSir Charles Gairdner HospitalPerthWAAustralia,Faculty of Health and Medical ScienceUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWAAustralia
| | - Thomas Cusick
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research and The Kinghorn Cancer CentreSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Andrew Kneebone
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia,Genesis Cancer CareSydneyNSWAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Thomas Eade
- Department of Radiation OncologyRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia,Genesis Cancer CareSydneyNSWAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Bao Ho
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear MedicineSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Andrew Nguyen
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia,Department of Theranostics and Nuclear MedicineSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Colin Tang
- Department of Radiation OncologySir Charles Gairdner HospitalPerthWAAustralia
| | - Michael McCarthy
- Department of Nuclear MedicineFiona Stanley HospitalPerthWAAustralia
| | - Roslyn Francis
- Faculty of Health and Medical ScienceUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthWAAustralia,Department of Nuclear MedicineFiona Stanley HospitalPerthWAAustralia
| | - Phillip Stricker
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SydneySydneyNSWAustralia,Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia,Department of UrologySt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNSWAustralia,Department of Theranostics and Nuclear MedicineSt Vincent's HospitalSydneyNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ceci F, Rovera G, Iorio GC, Guarneri A, Chiofalo V, Passera R, Oderda M, Dall'Armellina S, Liberini V, Grimaldi S, Bellò M, Gontero P, Ricardi U, Deandreis D. Event-free survival after 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in recurrent hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients eligible for salvage therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3257-3268. [PMID: 35217883 PMCID: PMC9250462 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05741-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background/aim Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen/positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) detects with high accuracy disease-recurrence, leading to changes in the management of biochemically-recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer (PCa). However, data regarding the oncological outcomes of patients who performed PSMA-PET are needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of clinically relevant events during follow-up in patients who performed PSMA-PET for BCR after radical treatment. Materials and methods This analysis included consecutive, hormone-sensitive, hormone-free, recurrent PCa patients (HSPC) enrolled through a prospective study. All patients were eligible for salvage therapy, having at least 24 months of follow-up after PSMA-PET. The primary endpoint was the Event-Free Survival (EFS), defined as the time between the PSMA-PET and the date of event/last follow-up. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the EFS curves. EFS was also investigated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Events were defined as death, radiological progression, or PSA recurrence after therapy. Results One-hundred and seventy-six (n = 176) patients were analyzed (median PSA 0.62 [IQR: 0.43–1.00] ng/mL; median follow-up of 35.4 [IQR: 26.5–40.3] months). The EFS was 78.8% at 1 year, 65.2% (2 years), and 52.2% (3 years). Patients experiencing events during study follow-up had a significantly higher median PSA (0.81 [IQR: 0.53–1.28] vs 0.51 [IQR: 0.36–0.80] ng/mL) and a lower PSA doubling time (PSAdt) (5.4 [IQR: 3.7–11.6] vs 12.7 [IQR: 6.6–24.3] months) (p < 0.001) compared to event-free patients. The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that PSA > 0.5 ng/mL, PSAdt ≤ 6 months, and a positive PSMA-PET result were associated with a higher event rate (p < 0.01). No significant differences of event rates were observed in patients who received changes in therapy management after PSMA-PET vs. patients who did not receive therapy changes. Finally, PSA > 0.5 ng/mL and PSAdt ≤ 6 months were statistically significant event-predictors in multivariate model (p < 0.001). Conclusion Low PSA and long PSAdt were significant predictors of longer EFS. A lower incidence of events was observed in patients having negative PSMA-PET, since longer EFS was significantly more probable in case of a negative scan. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-022-05741-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ceci
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. .,Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy. .,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncolology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. .,Nuclear Medicine Department, S. Croce E Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
| | - Guido Rovera
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.,Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Guarneri
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Valeria Chiofalo
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Passera
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Oderda
- Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Dall'Armellina
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Virginia Liberini
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Grimaldi
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Marilena Bellò
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, University Department of Radiological Sciences and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Désirée Deandreis
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Karagiannis V, Wichmann V, Saarinen J, Eigeliene N, Andersen H, Jekunen A. Radiotherapy treatment modification for prostate cancer patients based on PSMA-PET/CT. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:19. [PMID: 35093103 PMCID: PMC8800353 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01989-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men, and its diagnosis and treatment are improving. Our study evaluated how PSMA-PET/CT prior to treatment planning might improve the optimal management of prostate cancer radiotherapy. METHODS This retrospective pilot study included 43 prostate cancer (PCa) patients referred to our radiation oncologist department, from the urology department, for radiation therapy. 18F-PSMA-PET/CT was ordered by the radiation oncologists mainly due to the lack of resent image staging. The patients were divided into three different groups according to their initially planned treatments: radical radiation therapy (RT) (newly diagnosed PCa patients), salvage RT (patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy), or oligometastatic RT (oligometastatic PCa patients with good response after systemic treatment). RESULTS Following PSMA-PET/CT, the initially planned RT was changed for 60.5% of the patients due to new findings (metastases and/or recurrent disease). The final treatment choice was effected by PSMA-PET/CT outcome in 60.5% (26/43) of the patients, and in 50% (16/32) of patients, the radiation treatment plan changed following PSMA-PET/CT. Only 39.5% (17/43) of the patients who underwent PSMA-PET/CT were treated according to their initial treatment plans. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that PSMA-PET/CT impacts treatment decisions and the selection of RT as well as adjuvant treatment protocols in the management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Karagiannis
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
| | - Viktor Wichmann
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Juha Saarinen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Natalja Eigeliene
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Heidi Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Tema Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antti Jekunen
- Department of Oncology, Vaasa Central Hospital, Hietalahdenkatu 2-4, 65130 Vaasa, Finland
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
PSMA-Targeting Imaging and Theranostic Agents-Current Status and Future Perspective. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031158. [PMID: 35163083 PMCID: PMC8835702 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past two decades, extensive efforts have been made to develop agents targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for prostate cancer imaging and therapy. To date, represented by two recent approvals of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]F-DCFPyL by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to identify suspected metastases or recurrence in patients with prostate cancer, PSMA-targeting imaging and theranostic agents derived from small molecule PSMA inhibitors have advanced to clinical practice and trials of prostate cancer. The focus of current development of new PSMA-targeting agents has thus shifted to the improvement of in vivo pharmacokinetics and higher specific binding affinity with the aims to further increase the detection sensitivity and specificity and minimize the toxicity to non-target tissues, particularly the kidneys. The main strategies involve systematic chemical modifications of the linkage between the targeting moiety and imaging/therapy payloads. In addition to a summary of the development history of PSMA-targeting agents, this review provides an overview of current advances and future promise of PSMA-targeted imaging and theranostics with focuses on the structural determinants of the chemical modification towards the next generation of PSMA-targeting agents.
Collapse
|
25
|
Jadvar H, Calais J, Fanti S, Feng F, Greene KL, Gulley JL, Hofman M, Koontz BF, Lin DW, Morris MJ, Rowe SP, Royce TJ, Salami S, Savir-Baruch B, Srinivas S, Hope TA. Appropriate Use Criteria for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET Imaging. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:59-68. [PMID: 34593595 PMCID: PMC8717184 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Jadvar
- Department of Radiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Felix Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Kirsten L. Greene
- Department of Urology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Michael Hofman
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria Australia
| | - Bridget F. Koontz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel W. Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael J. Morris
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Steve P. Rowe
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Trevor J. Royce
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Simpa Salami
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Sandy Srinivas
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University, California; and
| | - Thomas A. Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ferdinandus J, Fendler WP, Farolfi A, Washington S, Mohamad O, Pampaloni MH, Scott PJH, Rodnick M, Viglianti BL, Eiber M, Herrmann K, Czernin J, Armstrong WR, Calais J, Hope TA, Piert M. PSMA PET Validates Higher Rates of Metastatic Disease for European Association of Urology Biochemical Recurrence Risk Groups: An International Multicenter Study. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:76-80. [PMID: 34620731 PMCID: PMC8717195 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The European Association of Urology (EAU) prostate cancer guidelines panel recommends risk groups for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer to identify men at high risk of progression or metastatic disease. The rapidly growing availability of PSMA-directed PET imaging will impact prostate cancer staging. We determined the rates of local and metastatic disease in BCR and biochemical persistence (BCP) of prostate cancer stratified by EAU BCR risk groups and BCP. Methods: Patients with BCR or BCP were enrolled under the same prospective clinical trial protocol conducted at 3 sites (n = 1,777 [91%]: UCLA, n = 662 [NCT02940262]; University of California San Francisco, n = 508 [NCT03353740]; University of Michigan, n = 607 [NCT03396874]); 183 patients with BCP from the Universities of Essen, Bologna, and Munich were included retrospectively. Patients with BCR had to have sufficient data to determine the EAU risk score. Multivariate, binomial logistic regression models were applied to assess independent predictors of M1 disease. Results: In total, 1,960 patients were included. Post-radical prostatectomy EAU BCR low-risk, EAU BCR high-risk, and BCP groups yielded distant metastatic (M1) detection in 43 of 176 (24%), 342 of 931 (37%), and 154 of 386 (40%) patients. For postradiotherapy EAU BCR low-risk and EAU BCR high-risk groups, the M1 detection rate was 113 of 309 (37%) and 110 of 158 (70%), respectively. BCP, high-risk BCR, and higher levels of serum prostate-specific antigen were significantly associated with PSMA PET M1 disease in multivariate regression analysis. PSMA PET revealed no disease in 25% and locoregional-only disease in 33% of patients with post-radical prostatectomy or postradiotherapy EAU BCR high risk. Conclusion: Our findings support the new EAU classification; EAU BCR high-risk groups have higher rates of metastatic disease on PSMA PET than do the low-risk groups. Discordant subgroups, including metastatic disease in low-risk patients and no disease in high-risk patients, warrant inclusion of PSMA PET stage to refine risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Ferdinandus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Samuel Washington
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Osama Mohamad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Miguel H Pampaloni
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Peter J H Scott
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Melissa Rodnick
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | | | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Wesley R Armstrong
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Imaging Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Morand Piert
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ceci F, Musi G, De Cobelli O. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography, Not Conventional Imaging, Should Be Performed for Primary Staging of High-risk Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 34:17-18. [PMID: 34766033 PMCID: PMC8572873 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Division of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Toxicity and Efficacy of Local Ablative, Image-guided Radiotherapy in Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Targeted Positron Emission Tomography-staged, Castration-sensitive Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The OLI-P Phase 2 Clinical Trial. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:44-51. [PMID: 34785189 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local ablative radiotherapy (aRT) of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is very promising and has become a focus of current clinical research. OBJECTIVE We hypothesize that aRT is safe and effective in gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)-staged oligometastatic PCa patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A nonrandomized, prospective, investigator-initiated phase 2 trial recruited patients with oligometastatic PCa (five or fewer lymph node or osseous metastases) after local curative therapy, without significant comorbidity and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), at two German centers from 2014 to 2018. INTERVENTION All PSMA-PET-positive metastases were treated with aRT. No systemic therapy was initiated. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was treatment-related toxicity (grade ≥2) 24 mo after aRT. A one-sided single-sample test of proportions was planned to test whether the endpoint occurs in <15% of the patients. Key secondary endpoints were time to progression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and time to ADT, which were associated with potential prognostic factors by Cox regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 72 patients, 63 received aRT (13% dropout rate). The median follow-up was 37.2 mo. No treatment-related grade ≥2 toxicity was observed 2 yr after treatment. The median time to PSA progression and time to ADT were 13.2 and 20.6 mo, respectively. Of the patients, 21.4% were free of PSA progression after 3 yr. CONCLUSIONS It was observed that aRT is safe, and midterm PSA progression and ADT-free time were achieved in one of five patients. Randomized clinical trials are indicated to further evaluate the option of delaying ADT in selected patients. PATIENT SUMMARY In this clinical trial, 63 patients with up to five metastases of prostate cancer without androgen deprivation therapy were included. We showed that local ablative radiotherapy is safe and that one in five patients had no recurrent prostate-specific antigen value after 3 yr. Local ablative radiotherapy might be an option to avoid systemic therapy in selected patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Are we at the end of adjuvant radiotherapy for prostate cancer? Actas Urol Esp 2021; 45:521-523. [PMID: 34538759 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
30
|
le Guevelou J, Achard V, Mainta I, Zaidi H, Garibotto V, Latorzeff I, Sargos P, Ménard C, Zilli T. PET/CT-Based Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Impact on Treatment Management and Future Directions. Front Oncol 2021; 11:742093. [PMID: 34532294 PMCID: PMC8438304 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.742093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence is a clinical situation experienced by 20 to 40% of prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). Prostate bed (PB) radiation therapy (RT) remains the mainstay salvage treatment, although it remains non-curative for up to 30% of patients developing further recurrence. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) using prostate cancer-targeting radiotracers has emerged in the last decade as a new-generation imaging technique characterized by a better restaging accuracy compared to conventional imaging. By adapting targeting of recurrence sites and modulating treatment management, implementation in clinical practice of restaging PET/CT is challenging the established therapeutic standards born from randomized controlled trials. This article reviews the potential impact of restaging PET/CT on changes in the management of recurrent prostate cancer after RP. Based on PET/CT findings, it addresses potential adaptation of RT target volumes and doses, as well as use of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). However, the impact of such management changes on the oncological outcomes of PET/CT-based salvage RT strategies is as yet unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer le Guevelou
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - Vérane Achard
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ismini Mainta
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Habib Zaidi
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Geneva Neuroscience Center, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Geneva Neuroscience Center, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Groupe Oncorad-Garonne, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Cynthia Ménard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Niaz MJ, Sun M, Skafida M, Niaz MO, Ivanidze J, Osborne JR, O'Dwyer E. Review of commonly used prostate specific PET tracers used in prostate cancer imaging in current clinical practice. Clin Imaging 2021; 79:278-288. [PMID: 34182326 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) underperforms in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) due to inherent characteristics of primary and metastatic tumors, including relatively low rate of glucose utilization. Consequently, alternate PCa PET imaging agents targeting other aspects of PCa cell biology have been developed for clinical practice. The most common dedicated PET imaging tracers include 68Ga/18F prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), 11C-Choline, and 18F-fluciclovine (Axumin™). This review will describe how these agents target specific inherent characteristics of PCa and explore the current literature for these agents for both primary and recurrent PCa, comparing the advantages and limitations of each tracer. Both 11C-Choline and 18F-Fluciclovine PET have been shown to detect nodal and osseous disease at higher rates compared to FDG-PET but offer no additional benefit in detecting prostate disease, especially in primary staging. As a result, PSMA PET, specifically 68Ga-PSMA-11, has emerged as a key imaging option for both primary and recurrent cancer. PSMA PET may be more sensitive than MRI at the local level and more sensitive than 11C-Choline and 18F-Fluciclovine PET for distant disease. Furthermore, compared to 11C-Choline and 18F-Fluciclovine PET, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET has higher detection rates at low PSA levels (<2 ng/dL). With improved delineation of disease, PSMA imaging has influenced treatment planning; radiation fields can be narrowed, and patients with isolated or oligo-metastatic disease can be spared systemic therapy. The retrospective nature of many of the studies describing these PCa imaging modalities complicates their assessment and comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Sun
- Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| | - Myrto Skafida
- Molecular imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| | | | - Jana Ivanidze
- Molecular imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Molecular imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| | - Elisabeth O'Dwyer
- Molecular imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Strauss DS, Sachpekidis C, Kopka K, Pan L, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Pharmacokinetic studies of [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: detection, differences in temporal distribution and kinetic modelling by tissue type. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4472-4482. [PMID: 34110436 PMCID: PMC8566392 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05420-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is a promising radiopharmaceutical for detecting tumour lesions in prostate cancer, but knowledge of the pharmacokinetics is limited. Dynamic PET-CT was performed to investigate the tumour detection and differences in temporal distribution, as well as in kinetic modelling of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 by tissue type. Methods Dynamic PET-CT over the lower abdomen and static whole-body PET-CT 80–90 min p.i. from 142 patients with biochemical recurrence were retrospectively analysed. Detection rates were compared to PSA levels. Average time-activity curves were calculated from tumour lesions and normal tissue. A three-compartment model and non-compartment model were used to calculate tumour kinetics. Results Overall detection rate was 70.42%, and in patients with PSA > 0.4 ng/mL 76.67%. All tumour lesions presented the steepest standardised uptake value (SUV) incline in the first 7–8 min before decreasing to different degrees. Normal tissue presented with a low uptake, except for the bladder, which accumulated activity the steepest 15–16 min. p.i.. While all tumour lesions continuously increased, bone metastases showed the steepest decline, resulting in a significantly lower SUV than lymph node metastases (60 and 80–90 min). Transport rate from the blood and tracer binding and internalisation rate were lower in bone metastases. Heterogeneity (fractal dimension) and vascular density were significantly lower in bone metastases. Conclusion Even at low PSA between 0.51 and 0.99 ng/mL, detection rate was 57%. Dynamic imaging showed a time window in the first 10 min where tumour uptake is high, but no bladder activity is measured, aiding accuracy in distinction of local recurrence. Kinetic modelling provided additional information for tumour characterisation by tissue type. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05420-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios S Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - C Sachpekidis
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner site Dresden, Germany.,Fakultät Chemie und Lebensmittelchemie, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - L Pan
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Haberkorn
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg and partner site Dresden, Germany.,Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69210, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Couñago F, Alvarez-Maestro M. Are we at the end of adjuvant radiotherapy for prostate cancer? Actas Urol Esp 2021; 45:S0210-4806(21)00085-1. [PMID: 33992447 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F Couñago
- Departamento de Radiología Oncológica, Hospital Universitario Quirón Salud, Madrid, España; Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea, Madrid, España
| | - M Alvarez-Maestro
- Departamento de Urología. Hospital Universitario La Paz. Madrid. España.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Farolfi A, Calderoni L, Mattana F, Mei R, Telo S, Fanti S, Castellucci P. Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:596-604. [PMID: 33712536 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on most prostate cancer (PCa) cells, and several PSMA ligands for PET imaging are now available worldwide. 68Ga-PSMA-11 has already received U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval, and use of PSMA PET is currently suggested by several international guidelines for investigating PCa in different clinical settings. In primary PCa, PSMA PET has been shown to be superior to cross-sectional imaging for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases with subsequent clinical management changes. Additionally, it might also have a role in intraprostatic tumor localization, especially when combined with multiparametric MRI. In a setting of PCa recurrence, higher detection rates have been observed than for any other available imaging techniques, especially at low prostate-specific antigen values. Furthermore, PSMA PET consistently led to a shift in clinical management, thus increasing the proportion of radiotherapy, surgery, or other focal therapies at the expense of systemic options or no treatment. In oligometastatic disease after radical surgery, PSMA PET may be relevant in guiding a metastasis-directed therapy approach, as preliminary data seem to suggest a benefit in terms of progression-free survival after treatment of PSMA PET-positive lesions. As a staging and gatekeeping technique, PSMA PET represents a reliable whole-body imaging procedure in combination with second-line therapy of castration-resistant PCa, as well as being pivotal when assessing patients eligible for radioligand therapy such as 177Lu-PSMA. This critical review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the latest literature on the current or emerging main indications, as well as a general outlook on the recommended interpretation criteria for PSMA PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Letizia Calderoni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Mattana
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sivi Telo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|