1
|
Can V, Bulduk M, Ayşin N, Kurt Can E, Aydın N. Determination of complementary and alternative medicine use frequency and related factors in children with epilepsy: A descriptive Cross-Sectional study from eastern Turkey. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 160:110041. [PMID: 39393143 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to determine the complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) methods used in epilepsy patients admitted to a paediatric neurology clinic in Turkey and to examine the factors affecting these methods. METHODS This study was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 by using a questionnaire form prepared in line with the literature to the parents (n = 172) of children who were under the age of 18 and who had been diagnosed with epilepsy for at least 1 year and who were followed up in the paediatric neurology outpatient clinic of a secondary care hospital in Van province of Turkey. The principles of scientific ethics and confidentiality of data were complied with in all stages of the study. RESULTS The study included 172 parents of 172 children with a mean age of 2.95 ± 0.93 years. In the study, it was found that 37.2 % of the parents had previously used CAM themselves, almost all of the parents (98.8 %) had not discussed the use of CAM with their physician or nurse, half of the parents considered CAM to be dangerous, and 28.2 % wanted to receive counselling to learn more about CAM. It was also found that 28.5 % of the parents used CAM in the treatment of their children. The most commonly preferred CAM among parents in the treatment of epilepsy was religious healing (79.6 %) which is among mind/body practices. It was found that the most common technique used by parents was regular praying (71.4 %). Religious beliefs were effective in the use of CAM in our patient population, while confidence in medical treatment was effective in not using CAM. More than half of the parents who used CAM in their child's treatment reported benefits and reduced seizure frequency. The factors significantly associated with CAM use in children with epilepsy were parental education level, parental CAM use and disease duration. In univariate and multivariate analyses, it was found that a degree below high school increased the likelihood of CAM use by 0.017 and 0.024 times, respectively, compared to being illiterate. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric nurses' routine examination of CAM methods used in paediatric epilepsy patients and the factors affecting these methods is very important in terms of preventing negative effects on child health, effective management of the disease process, ensuring safe use and strengthening communication to improve the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veysel Can
- Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Professor Asistant, Van, Turkey.
| | - Mehmet Bulduk
- Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Professor Asistant, Van, Turkey.
| | - Nesrullah Ayşin
- Hakkari University, Vocational School of Health Service, Lecturer, Hakkari, Turkey.
| | - Emine Kurt Can
- Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Lecturer Doctor, Van, Turkey.
| | - Nihal Aydın
- Sbu. Van Educatıon and Research Hospıtal, Doctor, Van, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ding JL, Taylor DM, Lee M, Johnson OG, Ashok A, Griffiths M, Simma L, Craig SS, Cheek JA, Babl FE. Observational study of alternative therapies among paediatric emergency department patients. Emerg Med Australas 2017; 29:136-142. [PMID: 28244266 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Revised: 01/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While complementary medicine use among ED paediatric patients is common, the use of alternative therapies (ATs; physical or spiritual therapies) is unknown. We aimed to determine the 12 month period prevalence and nature of AT use among paediatric patients and parent perceptions of AT use. METHODS We undertook a cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of parents of paediatric patients in three EDs in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia (January-June, 2015). Parents were invited to complete a validated, anonymous, self-administered questionnaire. The main outcomes were AT use by the patient and parent perceptions of ATs. RESULTS A total of 806 parents were enrolled. In the previous 12 months, 393 (48.8%) patients had received at least one AT. There were no gender or ethnicity differences between AT users and non-users. AT use was more common among older patients (P < 0.05). Patients with chronic illness tended to use more ATs (P = 0.12). A total of 1091 courses of 43 different ATs had been provided. The most common were massage (16% of patients), chiropractic therapy (9.8%), relaxation (7.2%), meditation (6.2%) and aromatherapy (6.1%). ATs were generally used for musculoskeletal problems, health maintenance, stress and anxiety. Parents who arranged the ATs were significantly more likely to report that ATs are safe, prevent and treat illness, assist prescription medicines and offer a more holistic approach to healthcare (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION AT use is common among paediatric ED patients. Parents who arrange AT have differing perceptions of AT usefulness and safety from those who do not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juen-Li Ding
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David McD Taylor
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marina Lee
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Olivia G Johnson
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aadith Ashok
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Meg Griffiths
- Paediatric Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Emergency Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Emergency Research Collaborative, Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leopold Simma
- Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon S Craig
- Paediatric Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Emergency Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash Emergency Research Collaborative, Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John A Cheek
- Paediatric Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Emergency Program, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Franz E Babl
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|