En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Single-center Prospective Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Current laser application in En bloc resection of bladder tumor- a narrative literature review

At present, laser en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has attracted great interest with potential superiority to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). It has several advantages, including complete resection, intact specimen for accurate histologic assessment, avoiding fragmentation and tumor seeding, preventing obturator nerve reflex, and reduction of inflammatory response. Several types of lasers have been studied in the application of ERBT, for example, holmium laser, green-light laser, thulium laser, diode laser. This paper reviews current literature concerning the characteristics of these types of laser, the surgical technique and procedures of laser ERBT with its advantages and limitations, and future directions in clinical development, aiming to display the status quo of these techniques in clinical practice.

Randomized Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Transurethral Resection for Staging New Bladder Cancers: Results From the Prospective BladderPath Trial

PURPOSE

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the initial staging procedure for new bladder cancers (BCs). For muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBCs), TURBT may delay definitive treatment. We investigated whether definitive treatment can be expedited for MIBC using flexible cystoscopic biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for initial staging.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective open-label, randomized study conducted within 17 UK hospitals (registered as ISRCTN 35296862). Participants with suspected new BC were randomly assigned 1:1 to TURBT-staged or mpMRI-staged care, with minimization factors of sex, age, and clinician visual assessment of stage. Blinding was not possible. Patients unable/unwilling to undergo mpMRI or with previous BC were ineligible. The study had two stages with separate primary outcomes of feasibility and time to correct treatment (TTCT) for MIBC, respectively.

RESULTS

Between May 31, 2018, and December 31, 2021, 638 patients were screened, and 143 participants randomly assigned to TURBT (n = 72; 55 males, 15 MIBCs) or initial mpMRI (n = 71; 53 males, 14 MIBCs). For feasibility, 36 of 39 (92% [95% CI, 79 to 98]) participants with suspected MIBC underwent mpMRI. The median TTCT for participants with MIBC was significantly shorter with initial mpMRI (n = 12, 53 days [95% CI, 20 to 89] v n = 14, 98 days [95% CI, 72 to 125] for TURBT, log-rank P .02). There was no detriment for participants with non-MIBC (median TTCT: n = 30, 17 days [95% CI, 8 to 25] for mpMRI v n = 28, 14 days [95% CI, 10 to 29] for TURBT, log-rank P = .67). No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The mpMRI-directed pathway led to a 45-day reduction in TTCT for MIBC. Incorporating mpMRI ahead of TURBT into the standard pathway was beneficial for all patients with suspected MIBC.

En Bloc Versus Conventional Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Oncological, Histopathological, and Surgical Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has been introduced to enhance the quality of resection of bladder cancer. This review aims to compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of ERBT and conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify randomized controlled trials published until May 2024. The primary outcomes were the risk of recurrence and progression. The secondary outcomes were detrusor muscle (DM) presence, muscularis mucosae (MM) detectability, bladder perforation and obturator nerve reflex rates, operative time, length of catheterization and hospitalization, and residual tumor at repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor (reTURBT).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Seventeen studies met our inclusion criteria. No statistically significant difference was observed in 12-mo recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.02; p = 0.08), 24-mo recurrence (RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.85-1.22; p = 0.8), and 12-mo progression (RR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.05-10.14; p = 0.8) rates. ERBT was significantly associated with a higher DM presence (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01-1.20; p = 0.02), while no statistically significant difference emerged in the residual tumor at reTURBT and MM detectability (all p > 0.05). ERBT was significantly associated with a lower risk of bladder perforation (p = 0.002) and obturator nerve reflex (p < 0.001). Finally, ERBT was significantly associated with longer operative time, lower catheterization time, and lower length of hospital stay. The main limitation was heterogeneity among the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

ERBT is safer due to fewer intraoperative events, but there was no significant difference in oncological outcomes compared with cTURBT. Higher DM detection with ERBT enhances initial disease stratification, potentially improving clinical decision-making and care delivery.

PATIENT SUMMARY

En bloc resection of bladder tumors is associated with lower intraoperative complications than and superior histopathological information to the conventional resection technique. However, the absence of a difference in oncological outcomes underscores the influence of factors such as tumor characteristics, surgeon expertise, and postoperative care on subsequent events.

A single-center retrospective comparison of pT1 substaging methods in bladder cancer

Substaging of T1 urothelial cancer is associated with tumor progression and its reporting is recommended by international guidelines. However, it has not been integrated in risk stratification tools and there is no agreement on the best method to use for its reporting. We aimed to investigate the applicability, interobserver variability, and prognostic value of histological landmark based and micrometric (aggregate linear length of invasive carcinoma (ALLICA), microscopic vs. extensive system, Rete Oncologica Lombarda (ROL) system) substaging methods. A total of 79 patients with the primary diagnosis of T1 urothelial cancer treated with conventional transurethral resection and adjuvant BCG therapy between 2000 and 2020 at the Medical University of Vienna were included. The anatomical and metrical substaging systems were evaluated using agreement rate, Cohen's kappa, Kendall's tau, and Spearman rank correlation. Prognostic value for high-grade recurrence or T2 progression was evaluated in uni- and multivariable analysis. Applicability and reproducibility were good to moderate and varied between substaging methods. Obstacles are mainly due to fragmentation of samples. Anatomical substaging was associated with progression in univariable and multivariable analysis. In our cohort, we could only identify anatomical landmark-based substaging to be prognostic for T2 progression. A major obstacle for proper pathological assessment is fragmentation of samples due to operational procedure. Avoiding such fragmentation might improve reproducibility and significance of pathological T1 substaging of urothelial cancer.

An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of the efficacy and safety of en bloc transurethral resection vs. conventional transurethral resection for nonmuscle-invasive bladder tumor

OBJECTIVE

En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) for nonmuscular-invasive bladder tumor (NMIBC) has been used in clinical practice, but its efficacy and safety have not been conclusional. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERBT and conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT) for NMIBC.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ERBT and cTURBT in the treatment of NMIBC were searched in Pubmed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane; 12 RCTs were included for systematic review and meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4.

RESULTS

A total of 12 RCTs involving 2097 patients with NMIBC were included and analyzed. The results showed the rate of identification of detrusor muscle in specimens [odds ratio (OR) 1.90; P = 0.03] was higher in ERBT group, and bladder perforation (OR 0.30; P = 0.004), obturator nerve reflex (OR 0.18; P = 0.001), catheter indwelling time (MD -0.64; P = 0.002), length of hospital stay (MD -0.58; P = 0.002), tumor recurrence rate 3 months after surgery (OR 0.42; P = 0.03), tumor recurrence rate 6 months after surgery (OR 0.21; P = 0.007), the recurrence rate of the same site 1 year after surgery (OR 0.23; P < 0.0001) and bleeding rate (OR 0.30; P = 0.0005) were significantly lower in ERBT group than that in cTURBT group. There was no significant difference in residual tumor (OR 0.62; P = 0.07), Re-TURBT (OR 0.71; P = 0.19), hemoglobin deficit (MD -0.81; P = 0.29), urethral stricture (OR 0.67; P = 0.42), resection time (MD 2.31; P = 0.16), operative time (MD 1.17; P = 0.49), 1 year (OR 0.61; P = 0.13), 2 years (OR 0.94; P = 0.76), 3-year tumor recurrence rate (OR 1.03; P = 0.86) and the risk of progression at 12 month (OR 0.68; P = 0.79) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that ERBT can improve the rate of identification of detrusor muscle in specimens and reduce the 3-month, 6-month tumor recurrence rate and recurrence rate of the same site 1 year after surgery. In addition, ERBT has fewer complications, and shorter catheter indentation time and hospital stay. The laser ERBT can also decrease tumor residual rate and re-TURBT.

Association of energy source with outcomes in en bloc TURB: secondary analysis of a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of different energy sources used for en-bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

This sub-analysis derived from a prospective randomized study that enrolled patients undergoing ERBT vs conventional transurethral resection of the bladder (cTURB) from January 2019 to January 2022 (NCT03718754). Endpoints were pathological specimen quality and perioperative outcomes after either monopolar (m-ERBT) or bipolar (b-ERBT) or laser (l-ERBT) ERBT.

RESULTS

237 bladder tumors resected in 188 patients included in the analyses: 29 (12.2%) m-ERBT, 136 (57.4%) b-ERBT and 72 (30.4%) l-ERBT. Detrusor muscle (DM) was detected in 191 (80.6%) specimens. Per-tumor analysis revealed comparable rate of DM in the specimens obtained via different energy modalities (p = 0.7). Operative time was longer in the l-ERBT cohort compared to m-ERBT and b-ERBT (p = 0.02) and no obturator nerve reflex (ONR) onset was reported. On logistic regression analysis, b-ERBT was associated with negative lateral resection margins (OR 2.81; 95% CI 1.02-7.70; p = 0.04). There was no significant association of the resection technique with perforation and conversion rates (all p > 0.05). Within a median follow up of 22mo (IQR 11-29), a total of 35 (18.6%) patients had a local recurrence. On Cox regression analysis, patients resected with b-ERBT were less likely to have a recurrence (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.15-0.78; p = 0.01); When adjusting for established confounders, this association was confirmed (HR 0.24; 95% CI 0.10-0.60; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Different energy sources might achieve comparable perioperative outcomes. Further perspectives involve the assessment of long-term differential oncological outcomes associated with various energy modalities.

Recent Advances and Emerging Innovations in Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Current Literature

Bladder cancer management, particularly non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), has evolved significantly due to advancements in imaging techniques and surgical methodologies. Enhanced tumor visualization methods, including Photodynamic Diagnosis (PDD) and Narrow-Band Imaging (NBI), offer improved detection rates for both papillary tumors and carcinoma in situ (CIS), compared to traditional white-light cystoscopy (WLC). Recent studies suggest that these technologies enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce recurrence rates, and improve oncological outcomes. Additionally, transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT), performed with advanced imaging, has demonstrated better resection quality, particularly in terms of detrusor muscle presence. Despite these innovations, challenges remain in the long-term impact on recurrence-free and progression-free survival. Artificial intelligence (AI) integration into cystoscopic imaging further promises enhanced diagnostic precision and cost-effective bladder cancer management. As personalized treatment paradigms emerge, predictive biomarkers, including genomic and pathological markers, may help stratify patients for aggressive treatment, sparing those at lower risk from unnecessary interventions. Future research should focus on validating these AI models and combining them with enhanced imaging modalities to refine treatment protocols further. These advancements collectively represent a significant leap toward precision medicine in bladder cancer care.

The Role of Morcellation in En Bloc Resection of Large Bladder Tumors

Background/Objectives: Conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is usually performed in a piecemeal manner, leading to difficulties in accurate pathological assessment. En bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has been developed to address these limitations, offering improved specimen quality. So far, ERBT has been restricted to small bladder tumors due to difficulties in en bloc extraction of large ones (>3 cm). Recently, the morcellation technique has been proposed to facilitate the removal of large bladder tumors during ERBT. This narrative review aims to evaluate the feasibility of ERBT with subsequent morcellation for large bladder tumors, focusing on its role in tumor extraction and its impact on pathological assessment. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases to identify studies evaluating the use of morcellation in ERBT for large bladder tumors. Inclusion criteria comprised studies reporting recurrence rates, detrusor muscle (DM) presence in pathological specimens, and perioperative complications. Additionally, we offered uropathologists a questionnaire to gather their perspectives on the use of morcellation following ERBT, focusing on its impact on pathological assessment, margin evaluation, and staging accuracy. Results: While there is limited evidence on the use of morcellation in ERBT for tumors larger than 3 cm and its impact on oncologic outcomes, morcellation has shown potential in facilitating the retrieval of large tumor specimens, ensuring clear resection margins and accurate staging. However, the learning curve for morcellation techniques and the need for specialized equipment may limit widespread adoption. Conclusions: Morcellation in ERBT for large bladder tumors represents a promising advancement in the management of these challenging cases, offering adequate pathological assessment and oncologic outcomes. Pathologists' reviews of morcellated specimens will likely further validate the technique. Continued research and technological innovations are necessary to optimize its implementation in clinical practice.

Optimal energy source selection strategies for en bloc resection in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This research aimed to identify the most effective energy source for en bloc resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) by a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. We assessed and contrasted the effectiveness and safety of various energy modalities used in en bloc resection (ERBT) with those employed in conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT).

METHODS

A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science (WOS) to discover relevant articles published till August 29, 2024. Research comparing en bloc resection using various energy sources (such as hybrid knife, holmium laser, thulium laser, green-light laser, monopolar, and bipolar devices) to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT) was included. A network meta-analysis was performed using Stata/MP 18.0. Standardized mean differences (SMD) were computed for continuous outcomes, whilst relative risks (RR) were used for dichotomous outcomes. Nine clinical outcomes were assessed: duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, catheterization duration, irrigation duration, volume of intraoperative blood transfusion, 12-month recurrence rate, bladder perforation rate, incidence of obturator nerve reflex, and presence of detrusor muscle in the resected specimen. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024623881).

RESULTS

The study included 37 research, including 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 29 high-quality non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs), with a total of 4973 patients involved. The network meta-analysis revealed that ERBT was much better than cTURBT in the majority of outcomes. Hybrid knife and laser technologies (holmium, thulium, and green-light lasers) shown superior efficacy regarding decreased surgical length, diminished 12-month recurrence rates, and fewer problems. Hybridknife proved to be the most advantageous energy source for various results, while cTURBT consistently exhibited the least effective performance across all metrics.

CONCLUSION

En bloc resection surpasses traditional TURBT in the management of NMIBC, with various energy modalities exhibiting distinct benefits. Among the assessed energy sources, laser technologies and hybrid knives regularly surpassed monopolar and bipolar devices. These findings provide critical direction for urologists in selecting the most suitable energy source for en bloc resection in NMIBC, emphasizing the need for individualized decision-making based on the patient's distinct variables and tumor attributes.

An international multicentre randomised controlled trial of en bloc resection of bladder tumour vs conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumour: first results of the en bloc resection of urothelium carcinoma of the bladder (EBRUC) II trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and oncological advantages of en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) vs conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumour (cTURBT) in terms of resection quality, staging quality, and safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-blinded randomised controlled trial at seven European hospitals with the following inclusion criteria: first diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, no singular carcinoma in situ, and tumour size >4.3 mm. Patients were randomised intraoperatively in a 1:1 ratio to either the ERBT or cTURBT group. Outcome analysis was performed using the chi-square test, t-test, and multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 97 patients were randomised into the study (cTURBT = 40, ERBT = 57). A switch to cTURBT was necessary in two patients (3.5%) and 11.5% of the screened patients were preoperatively excluded for ERBT. There was no difference in the specimen presence of detrusor muscle with 73.7% in cTURBT and 67.3% in ERBT specimens (P = 0.69). There were no significant differences in mean operative time (ERBT 27.6 vs cTURBT 25.4 min, P = 0.450) or mean resection time (ERBT 16.3 vs cTURBT 15.5 min, P = 0.732). Overall the complication rate did not differ significantly (ERBT 18.2% vs cTURBT 7.5%, P = 0.142). Bladder perforations occurred significantly more often in the ERBT group (ERBT seven vs cTURBT none, P = 0.020). R0 status was reported more often after ERBT, whilst a second resection was significantly less frequent after ERBT (P = 0.018). Recurrence rates were comparable for both techniques after 6 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility of ERBT is higher than previously reported. Whereas other perioperative and safety parameters are comparable to cTURBT, bladder perforations occurred significantly more often in the ERBT group and raised safety concerns. This is why this trial was terminated.

En bloc resection of large bladder tumor: is it feasible and reasonable?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the basis of bladder tumor diagnosis and an effective means of treating nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). There are several limitations to this procedure: TURBT may cause free floating of malignant cells in the bladder and as a result re-implantation and early recurrence. Also, it does not allow the pathologist to define the correct spatial orientation of the specimen. The development of en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) has helped overcome the abovementioned key disadvantages of TURBT. However, many urologists doubt whether this approach is feasible for treating larger tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, it is shown that ERBT of large bladder tumor (>3 cm) is in fact a feasible and well tolerated method. Although there is a lack of comparative data proving its advantages over TURBT, en bloc in large tumor seems to result in better local cancer control (due to higher prevalence of detrusor specimen, lower need for re-TURBT), lower rate of relapse outside the resection area (due to lower risk of tumor cells circulation), and higher quality of pathology specimen.

SUMMARY

Despite the skepticism of some surgeons, potential difficulties caused by larger tumor size may be overcome easily, and most agree that tumor size should not limit the implementation of the method in their daily practice.

Oncological outcomes and prognostic implications of T1 histo-anatomic substaging in the management of high-Grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: results from a large single centre series

PURPOSE

This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of T1 histo-anatomic substaging (T1a/T1b) for high grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) over a large single-centre cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with primary HG T1 NMIBC were identified from our Institutional database, between 2011 and 2022. Data from diagnosis to repeated transurethral resection of bladder tumour (RE-TURBT), bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treatment and follow-up were collected. Patients were stratified based on histo-anatomic landmark into T1a (invasion above the Muscularis Mucosa-MM) and T1b (into/beyond MM). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the impact of histo-anatomic substaging on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Substaging was feasible in 88% of cases. The median (IQR) follow-up was 40 (17-72) months. T1b patients had larger initial tumours (> 3 cm: 43.2% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001), while upstaging to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) at RE-TURBT was more frequent in T1b than in T1a (5.9% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.02). T1b patients without BCG induction had worse RFS and PFS (all p ≤ 0.02) compared to T1a, while no differences were observed in patients who received complete BCG induction. At Multivariate analysis, completing at least a BCG induction course was associated with better outcomes across all endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

Invasion of the MM in primary T1 NMIBC is associated with a higher risk of upstaging to MIBC. Patients who received full BCG induction had similar outcomes regardless of substaging, whereas T1b patients without BCG induction experienced higher recurrence and progression rates.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ)-A Summary of the 2024 Guidelines Update

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This publication represents a summary of the updated 2024 European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), TaT1, and carcinoma in situ. The information presented herein is limited to urothelial carcinoma, unless specified otherwise. The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of NMIBC with a focus on clinical presentation.

METHODS

For the 2024 guidelines on NMIBC, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with NMIBC. The guidelines stress the importance of defining patients' risk stratification and treating them appropriately.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This overview of the 2024 EAU guidelines offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, prognostic factors, treatment, and follow-up of NMIBC. These guidelines are designed for effective integration into clinical practice.

Role of repeat transurethral resection in no-muscle-invasive bladder tumour: an umbrella review

Background

Repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumour (reTURB) is a conventional treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to enhance prognosis. However, the necessity of reTURB in NMIBC remains controversial owing to upstaging of treatments and new evidence.

Objectives

We performed an umbrella review to determine the need for reTURB in patients with NMIBC.

Design

We extracted data from meta-analyses that were screened out after a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Methods

Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of each included meta-analysis and outcomes.

Results

Our study included seven meta-analyses. Two studies assessed the efficiency of reTURB in patients who underwent en bloc resection of bladder tumours (ERBT). Patients who underwent ERBT reported low residual tumour and upstaging rates of 5.9% and 0.3%, respectively. Conversely, patients who underwent conventional transurethral resection for bladder cancer (cTURB) had high residual tumour rates. Patients who underwent cTURB and reTURB had significantly improved 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to those who underwent initial cTURB alone. In terms of progression-free survival (PFS), a meta-analysis reported that patients who underwent cTURB and reTURB had significantly improved PFS compared with those who underwent initial cTURB alone. In the subgroup analyses of ERBT, reTURB did not affect the RFS and PFS of patients who received ERBT. Currently, only a limited number of randomised clinical trials have evaluated reTURB, and various factors have influenced its efficacy.

Conclusion

There was significant variation in survival outcomes among patients undergoing reTURB. The necessity and efficacy of reTURB depend on numerous factors, such as surgical approach, equipment and medication usage. Patients eligible for ERBT may constitute a group that does not require reTURB. Further clinical trials are required to validate these findings.

Registration

This umbrella review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023439078).

French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2024-2026: Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)

OBJECTIVE

To update the CCAFU recommendations for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

METHODS

A systematic review (Medline) of the literature from 20222024 was performed, taking into account the elements of diagnosis, treatment options and monitoring of NMIBC and evaluating references with their level of evidence.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, or CIS) is made after complete and deep tumour resection. The use of bladder photodynamic diagnosis and the indication for a second TURBT (4 to 6weeks later) help to improve the initial diagnosis. The risk of recurrence and/or tumour progression is assessed via the EORTC score. By stratifying patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, adjuvant treatment can be proposed, including endovesical instillations of chemotherapy (immediate postoperative regimen), BCG (induction and maintenance regimen), or even the indication of cystectomy for unresponsive patients.

CONCLUSION

Updating the CCAFU's recommendations should help improve patient management, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of NMIBC.

Current opinions regarding the clinical utility of en bloc resection in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer-a review of the literature

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is currently mainly treated with the approach of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by pathology investigation of the obtained specimens. However, this approach-TURBT-has a few drawbacks, owing to the inherent technical defect-"piecemeal" resection. With development of medical science and surgical techniques, a new kind of surgical operation-"en bloc" resection of bladder tumor (ERBT)-emerged, hoping to completely remove bladder tumor with surrounding normal tissue. The detrusor muscle layer beneath the tumor is removed, and the surgical quality of bladder tumor is enhanced, with a better pathological outcome, reduced intraoperative complications and lower recurrence rate eventually. This paper reviews current literature concerning a brief history of ERBT developing, surgical steps, its indications, advantages on surgical margin, recurrence during follow-up, pathological performance-presence of detrusor muscle, residual tumor and upstage, as well as such issue as "is reTURBT necessary after ERBT?" and the guiding significance of ERBT in substaging of T1 bladder cancer.

Strategies to Improve Clinical Outcomes and Patient Experience Undergoing Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe patient experiences of transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and review recent advances in enhancing clinical outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

High rates of recurrence and progression of non-muscle invasive bladder tumors expose patients to multiple TURBT procedures throughout their disease process. Understanding the impact of TURBT on quality of life and patient experiences is crucial for shared decision-making, thus enhanced recovery protocol trials are being explored to improve patient outcomes. The variability in TURBT practices worldwide contributes to differing bladder tumor recurrence rates, prompting efforts to standardize practices by evaluating the impact of patient, hospital, and surgeon factors. For select cases, less intensive surveillance regimens have reduced toxicities and costs without compromising oncologic outcomes. New innovative approaches such as en bloc- and stratified resection techniques may reduce perioperative complications and improve clinical outcomes. Finally, neoadjuvant and ablative treatments have shown to be promising alternatives to TURBT, necessitating further investigation in this setting. TURBT is essential for diagnosing and treating bladder cancer. Reducing associated morbidities and improving surgical outcomes involve multifaceted approaches, including standardizing surgical practices, exploring innovative techniques, and optimizing surveillance regimens, all while promoting patient quality of life. Neoadjuvant therapies as alternative treatments are on the horizon and may ultimately change the landscape of bladder cancer care.

Do we need a re-TUR after en bloc resection of T1 stage bladder cancer?

BACKGROUND

A second look trans-urethral resection of the bladder (re-TUR) is recommended after the diagnosis of T1 high grade (T1HG) bladder cancer. Few studies have evaluated the results of re-TUR after a first en bloc resection (EBR) and none of them have specifically reported the pathological results on the field of previous T1 disease.

OBJECTIVE

To report the rate of upstaging and the rate of residual disease (RD) on the field of T1HG lesions resected with EBR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 01/2014 and 06/2022, patients from 2 centers who had a re-TUR after an EBR for T1HG urothelial carcinoma were retrospectively included. Primary endpoint was the rate of RD including the rate of upstaging to T2 disease on the scar of the primary resection. Secondary endpoints were the rate of any residual disease outside the field.

RESULTS

Seventy-five patients were included. No muscle invasive bladder cancer lesions were found after re-TUR. Among the 16 patients who had a RD, 4 were on the resection scar. All of these lesions were papillary and high grade. RD outside the field of the first EBR was observed in 12 patients.

CONCLUSION

After EBR of T1HG disease, none of our patients had an upstaging to MIBC. However, the rate of RD either on and outside the field of the EBR remains quite significant. We suggested that predictive factors of residual papillary disease (number of tumors at the initial TUR and concomitant CIS) might be suitable to select patient who will benefit of the re-TUR.

Transurethral En Bloc Resection Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour: A Randomised, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Conventionally, standard resection (SR) is performed by resecting the bladder tumour in a piecemeal manner. En bloc resection of the bladder tumour (ERBT) has been proposed as an alternative technique in treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The objective of this study is to investigate whether ERBT could improve the 1-yr recurrence rate of NMIBC, as compared with SR.

METHODS

A multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial was conducted in Hong Kong. Adults with bladder tumour(s) of ≤ 3cm were enrolled from April 2017 to December 2020, and followed up until 1 yr after surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ERBT or SR in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was 1-yr recurrence rate. A modified intention-to-treat analysis on patients with histologically confirmed NMIBC was performed. The main secondary outcomes included detrusor muscle sampling rate, operative time, hospital stay, 30-d complications, any residual or upstaging of disease upon second-look transurethral resection, and 1-yr progression rate.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 350 patients underwent randomisation, and 276 patients were histologically confirmed to have NMIBC. At 1 yr, 31 patients in the ERBT group and 46 in the SR group developed recurrence; the Kaplan-Meier estimate of 1- yr recurrence rates were 29% (95% confidence interval, 18-37) in the ERBT group and 38% (95% confidence interval, 28-46) in the SR group (p = 0.007). Upon a subgroup analysis, patients with 1-3 cm tumour, single tumour, Ta disease, or intermediate-risk NMIBC had a significant benefit from ERBT. None of the patients in the ERBT group and three patients in the SR group developed progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer; the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-yr progression rates were 0% in the ERBT group and 2.6% (95% confidence interval, 0-5.5) in the SR group (p = 0.065). The median operative time was 28 min (interquartile range, 20-45) in the ERBT group and 22 min (interquartile range, 15-30) in the SR group (p < 0.001). All other secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In patients with NMIBC of ≤ 3cm, ERBT resulted in a significant reduction in the 1-yr recurrence rate when compared with SR. The study results support ERBT as the first-line surgical treatment for patients with bladder tumours of≤ 3cm.

Repeat Transurethral Resection (TUR) + Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Versus Upfront Induction BCG After TUR in High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Feasibility Phase of a Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

High-level evidence supporting the role of repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is lacking. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing whether immediate reTUR has an impact on patient prognosis is essential. However, since such a RCT will require enrollment of a high number of patients, a preliminary feasibility study is appropriate.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of an RCT investigating the impact of immediate reTUR + adjuvant bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) versus upfront induction BCG after initial TUR in NMIBC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either reTUR + adjuvant BCG or upfront induction BCG after TUR. Patients with macroscopically completely resected high-grade T1 NMIBC, with or without concomitant carcinoma in situ, and with detrusor muscle (DM) present in the initial TUR specimen were considered eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included lymphovascular invasion (LVI), histological subtypes, hydronephrosis, concomitant upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), or urothelial carcinoma within the prostatic urethra. The aim was to enroll 30 patients in this feasibility study.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The patient recruitment rate was the primary outcome. Oncological outcomes (recurrence-free and progression-free survival) were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 30 patients (15 per arm) were randomized over a period of 14 mo (August 2020-October 2021). Two eligible patients refused the randomization, resulting in a patient compliance rate of 93.3% for the study protocol. We excluded 49 ineligible patients before randomization because of histological subtypes (n = 16, 33%), LVI (n = 9, 18%), DM absence in the TUR specimen (n = 12, 24%), metastatic disease (n = 5, 10%), concomitant UTUC (n = 3, 6%), or hydronephrosis (n = 4, 8%). At reTUR, persistent disease was found in four patients (29%) and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease in one (7%). Over median follow-up of 17 mo, disease recurrence was detected in three patients (23%) in the reTUR arm and six patients (40%) in the upfront BCG arm. Progression to muscle-invasive disease was observed in one patient treated with upfront BCG.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility of conducting an RCT comparing upfront BCG versus reTUR + BCG in high-grade T1 NMIBC has been demonstrated. Our results underline the need to screen a large number of patients owing to characteristics meeting the exclusion criteria in a high percentage of cases.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We found that a clinical trial of the role of a repeat surgical procedure to remove bladder tumors through the urethra would be feasible among patients with high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. These preliminary results may help in refining the role of this repeat procedure for patients in this category.

Photodynamic Diagnosis and Therapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer (BC) possesses distinct molecular profiles that influence progression depending on its biological nature and delivered treatment intensity. Muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) and non-MIBC (NMIBC) demonstrate great intrinsic heterogeneity regarding different prognoses, survival, progression, and treatment outcomes. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the standard of care in treating NMIBC and serves both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes despite the prevalent recurrence and progression among many patients. In particular, flat urothelial carcinoma in situ and urothelial carcinoma with lamina propria invasion are the major precursors of MIBC. A new-generation photosensitizer, 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA), demonstrates high tumor specificity by illuminating the tumor lesion with a specific wavelength of light to produce fluorescence and has been studied for photodynamic diagnosis to detect precise tumor areas by TURBT. Additionally, it has been applied for treatment by producing its cytotoxic reactive oxygen species, as well as screening for urological carcinomas by excreting porphyrin in the blood and urine. Moreover, 5-ALA may contribute to screening before and after TURBT in NMIBC. Here, we summarize the updated evidence and ongoing research on photodynamic technology for NMIBC, providing insight into the potential for improving patient outcomes.

Efficiency of transurethral en-bloc resection vs. conventional transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: An umbrella review

BACKGROUND

En-Bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) was clinically used to resect non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, discrepancies persist regarding the comparisons between ERBT and conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and performed manual searches of reference lists to collect and extract data. Data evaluation was carried out using Review Manager 5.4.0, Rx64 4.1.3, and relevant packages.

RESULTS

There were nine eligible meta-analyses and nine eligible RCTs in our study. NMIBC patients undergoing ERBT were significant associated with a lower rate of bladder perforation and obturator nerve reflex compared to those receiving cTURBT. Our pooled result indicated that ERBT and cTURBT required similar operation time. Regarding postoperative outcomes, ERBT demonstrated superior performance compared to cTURBT in terms of detrusor muscle presence, catheterization time, and residual tumor. ERBT exhibited a higher rate of three-month recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to those receiving cTURBT (p < 0.05; I2 = 0%). In bipolar subgroup, ERBT had a significant better 12-month RFS than cTURBT (p < 0.05; I2 = 0%). Simultaneously, the exclusion of Hybrid Knife data revealed a significant improvement in 12-month RFS associated with ERBT (p < 0.05; I2 = 50%).

CONCLUSION

Using a combination of umbrella review and meta-analysis, we demonstrated that ERBT had better or comparable perioperative outcome and improved 3 and 12 month RFS than cTURBT. We suggest that ERBT maybe a better surgical method for patients with NMIBC compared with cTURBT.

[Should we all switch to en-bloc resection of bladder tumours?]

In En-Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumours (ERBT), tumours are not removed in fragments, but are dissected in one layer and, if possible, extracted in one piece. This method represents a significant shift in the surgical management of non-muscle-invasive bladder tumours, providing multiple benefits over the traditional transurethral resection of the bladder (TUR-B). The histological analysis of ERBT specimens is more accurate, enhancing diagnostic precision. Additionally, the presence of detrusor muscle in ERBT specimens is more frequent, indicating a more complete removal of the tumours. Recent years have seen the consolidation of a robust evidence base emphasizing the advantages of ERBT. Notably, a multicentric, prospective randomized trial has recently revealed a significant reduction in recurrence rates at 12 months follow-up compared with TUR-B. Experienced endourologists should explore this technique, as it may soon become the standard of care. The technique's elegance and effectiveness make it too important to be ignored.

BCG and Alternative Therapies to BCG Therapy for Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Treatment decisions are mostly decided based on disease stage (non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive). Patients with muscle-invasive disease will be offered a radical treatment combined with systemic therapy, while in those with non-muscle-invasive disease, an attempt to resect the tumor endoscopically will usually be followed by different intravesical instillations. The goal of intravesical therapy is to decrease the recurrence and/or progression of the tumor. In the current landscape of bladder cancer treatment, BCG is given intravesically to induce an inflammatory response and recruit immune cells to attack the malignant cells and induce immune memory. While the response to BCG treatment has changed the course of bladder cancer management and spared many "bladders", some patients may develop BCG-unresponsive disease, leaving radical surgery as the best choice of curative treatment. As a result, a lot of effort has been put into identifying novel therapies like systemic pembrolizumab and Nadofaragene-Firadenovac to continue sparing bladders if BCG is ineffective. Moreover, recent logistic issues with BCG production caused a worldwide BCG shortage, re-sparking interest in alternative BCG treatments including mitomycin C, sequential gemcitabine with docetaxel, and others. This review encompasses both the historic and current role of BCG in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer, revisiting BCG alternative therapies and reviewing the novel therapeutics that were approved for the BCG-unresponsive stage or are under active investigation.

Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of bladder cancer: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (TRUST)-Group

PURPOSE

To identify laser settings and limits applied by experts during laser vaporization (vapBT) and laser en-bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) and to identify preventive measures to reduce complications.

METHODS

After a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, we conducted a survey (57 questions) which was sent to laser experts. The expert selection was based on clinical experience and scientific contribution. Participants were asked for used laser types, typical laser settings during specific scenarios, and preventive measures applied during surgery. Settings for a maximum of 2 different lasers for each scenario were possible. Responses and settings were compared among the reported laser types.

RESULTS

Twenty-three of 29 (79.3%) invited experts completed the survey. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) is the most common laser (57%), followed by Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (48%), continuous wave (cw) Thulium:Yttrium-Aluminium-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (26%), and pulsed Tm:YAG (13%). Experts prefer ERBT (91.3%) to vapBT (8.7%); however, relevant limitations such as tumor size, number, and anatomical tumor location exist. Laser settings were generally comparable; however, we could find significant differences between the laser sources for lateral wall ERBT (p = 0.028) and standard ERBT (p = 0.033), with cwTm:YAG and pulsed Tm:YAG being operated in higher power modes when compared to TFL and Ho:YAG. Experts prefer long pulse modes for Ho:YAG and short pulse modes for TFL lasers.

CONCLUSION

TFL seems to have replaced Ho:YAG and Tm:YAG. Most laser settings do not differ significantly among laser sources. For experts, continuous flow irrigation is the most commonly applied measure to reduce complications.

Bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is a global health issue with sex differences in incidence and prognosis. Bladder cancer has distinct molecular subtypes with multiple pathogenic pathways depending on whether the disease is non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive. The mutational burden is higher in muscle-invasive than in non-muscle-invasive disease. Commonly mutated genes include TERT, FGFR3, TP53, PIK3CA, STAG2 and genes involved in chromatin modification. Subtyping of both forms of bladder cancer is likely to change considerably with the advent of single-cell analysis methods. Early detection signifies a better disease prognosis; thus, minimally invasive diagnostic options are needed to improve patient outcomes. Urine-based tests are available for disease diagnosis and surveillance, and analysis of blood-based cell-free DNA is a promising tool for the detection of minimal residual disease and metastatic relapse. Transurethral resection is the cornerstone treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and intravesical therapy can further improve oncological outcomes. For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care with evidence supporting trimodality therapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated benefit in non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers patient characteristics and molecular disease characteristics.

En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

En bloc transurethral resection of the bladder (eTURB) might improve the surgical management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in comparison to conventional TURB (cTURB).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether eTURB is superior to cTURB in resection of NMIBC and specimen retrieval.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a randomized, multicenter trial in patients with up to three cTa-T1 NMIBC tumors of 1-3 cm in size, who were enrolled from January 2019 to January 2022.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomized 1:1 to undergo eTURB (n = 192) or cTURB (n = 192).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was the prevalence of detrusor muscle (DM) in the specimen retrieved. Secondary endpoints included bladder perforation, persistent disease at second-look TURB, positive lateral resection margin, positive deep resection margin, operation time, perforation rate, obturator reflex, conversion from eTURB to cTURB, recurrence-free survival, and disease recurrence at 3 mo.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 384 patients were randomized to undergo eTURB or cTURB. A total of 452 tumors were resected and analyzed for the primary outcome. eTURB was superior to cTURB in retrieval of DM (80.7% vs 71.1%; mixed-model p = 0.01). Bladder perforation (5.6% vs 12%; difference -6.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -12.2% to -0.6%) and obturator reflex (8.4% vs 16%; difference -7.6%; 95% CI -14.3% to -0.9%) were less frequent in the eTURB arm than in the cTURB arm. Operation time did not differ between the two techniques (26 min, interquartile range [IQR] 20-38 for eTURB vs 25 min, IQR 17-35 for cTURB; difference 1 min, 95% CI -25.9 to 4.99). Second-look TURB was performed in 24 patients in the eTURB arm and 34 in the cTURB arm, with no difference in the rate of residual papillary disease (pTa/pT1: 56% vs 55.9%; difference 0.1%, 95% CI -25.5% to 25.7%). At median follow-up of 13 mo (IQR 7-20), 18.4% of the patients in the eTURB arm and 16.7% in the cTURB arm had experienced bladder cancer recurrence (Cox hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.49-1.52; p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with clinical NMIBC with up to three tumors of 1-3 cm in size, tumor removal via eTURB resulted in a higher rate of DM in the pathologic specimen in comparison to cTURB. Moreover, eTURB was associated with lower frequency of obturator reflex and bladder perforation than cTURB was. While improving on the quality indicators for NMIBC, the long-term differential oncologic benefits of eTURB remain uncertain.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We compared two techniques for removal of bladder tumors and found that tumor removal in a single piece, called en bloc resection, provides a better-quality specimen for pathology analysis and fewer complications in comparison to the conventional method. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03718754.

En bloc resection of bladder tumour: the rebirth of past through reminiscence

PURPOSE

To learn about the history and development of en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT), and to discuss its future directions in managing bladder cancer.

METHODS

In this narrative review, we summarised the history and early development of ERBT, previous attempts in overcoming the tumour size limitation, consolidative effort in standardising the ERBT procedure, emerging evidence in ERBT, evolving concepts in treating large bladder tumours, and the future directions of ERBT.

RESULTS

Since the first report on ERBT in 1980, there has been tremendous advancement in terms of its technique, energy modalities and tumour retrieval methods. In 2020, the international consensus statement on ERBT has been developed and it serves as a standard reference for urologists to practise ERBT. Recently, high-quality evidence on ERBT has been emerging. Of note, the EB-StaR study showed that ERBT led to a reduction in 1-year recurrence rate from 38.1 to 28.5%. An individual patient data meta-analysis is currently underway, and it will be instrumental in defining the true value of ERBT in treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For large bladder tumours, modified approaches of ERBT should be accepted, as the quality of resection is more important than a mere removal of tumour in one piece. The global ERBT registry has been launched to study the value of ERBT in a real-world setting.

CONCLUSION

ERBT is a promising surgical technique in treating bladder cancer and it has gained increasing interest globally. It is about time for us to embrace this technique in our clinical practice.

A 10-year renaissance of en bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT): Are we approaching the peak or is it back to the trough?

BACKGROUND

The number of studies suggesting that en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) is superior to transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) management is growing. The aim of this review is to discuss the features of these procedures and to determine the prospects of en bloc in NMIBC management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a literature search using two databases (Medline and Scopus) and included any research which reported ERBT outcomes.

RESULTS

The lasers with minimal tissue penetration depth are becoming the main tool for ERBT. Unfortunately, most of the systematic reviews continue to be characterized by high heterogeneity. However, recent studies indicate that ERBT may have the edge when it comes to the detrusor muscle rate and the quality of the histological specimen. ERBT may favor in terms of in-field relapse, but its rate in the studies varies greatly. As for out-field relapse-free survival, the data are still lacking. The strongest evidence supports that ERBT is superior to TURBT in complications rate (bladder perforation). ERBT is feasible irrespective to tumor size and location.

CONCLUSIONS

ERBT has gained in momentum with the increasingly widespread use of this kind of laser surgery. The introduction of novel sources (TFL and Thulium:YAG pulsed laser) will definitely affect how the field develops and will result in further improvements in safety and precision. The latest trials make us more certain in our belief that ERBT will be beneficial in terms of histological specimen quality, relapse rate and complications rate.

En Bloc Resection Versus Conventional TURBT for T1HG Bladder Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the clinical, oncological, and pathological impact of en bloc resection of bladder tumors (ERBT) compared with conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumors (cTURBT) for pT1 high-grade (HG) bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the record of 326 patients (cTURBT: n = 216, ERBT: n = 110) diagnosed with pT1 HG bladder cancer at multiple institutions. The cohorts were matched by one-to-one propensity scores based on patient and tumor demographics. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and perioperative and pathologic outcomes were compared. The prognosticators of RFS and PFS were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

After matching, 202 patients (cTURBT: n = 101, ERBT: n = 101) were retained. There were no differences in perioperative outcomes between the two procedures. The 3-year RFS, PFS, and CSS were not different between the two procedures (p = 0.7, 1, and 0.7, respectively). Among patients who underwent repeat transurethral resection (reTUR), the rate of any residue on reTUR was significantly lower in the ERBT group (cTURBT: 36% versus ERBT: 15%, p = 0.029). Adequate sampling of muscularis propria (83% versus 93%, p = 0.029) and diagnostic rates of pT1a/b substaging (90% versus 100%, p < 0.001) were significantly better in ERBT specimen compared with cTURBT specimen. On multivariable analyses, pT1a/b substaging was a prognosticator of disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pT1HG bladder cancer, ERBT had similar perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes compared with cTURBT. However, ERBT improves the quality of resection and specimen, yielding less residue on reTUR and yielding superior histopathologic information such as substaging.

En-bloc resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: does it really make a difference?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) followed by pathology investigation of the obtained specimens is the initial step in the management of urinary bladder cancer (UBC). By following the basic principles of oncological surgery, en-bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) aims to overcome the limitations associated with conventional transurethral resection, and to improve the quality of pathological specimens for a better decision making. The current bulk of evidence provides controversial results regarding the superiority of one technique over the other. The aim of this article is to summarize the recent data and provide evidence on this unanswered question.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite heterogeneous and controversial data, ERBT seems to have a better safety profile and deliver higher quality pathologic specimens. However, the recent evidence failed to support the hypothesized oncological potential benefits of ERBT in the initial surgical treatment of patients with UBC.

SUMMARY

ERBT has gained increasing interest globally in the past decade. It continues to represent a promising strategy with a variety of features intended to solve the inherent limitations of TURBT. However, the current quality of evidence does not allow solid conclusions to be drawn about its presumed superiority compared with the conventional technique.

Implementing a Checklist for Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor to Standardize Outcome Reporting: When High-quality Resection Could Influence Oncological Outcomes

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) to conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT) have reported controversial results. In particular, the 1-yr recurrence rate ranged from 5% to 40% for ERBT and from 11% to 31% for cTURBT. We provide an updated analysis of an RCT comparing the 1-yr recurrence rate for ERBT versus cTURBT for a cohort of 219 patients comprising 123 (56.2%) in the ERBT group and 96 (43.8%) in the cTURBT group. At 1 yr, 11 patients in the ERBT group and 12 in the cTURBT group experienced recurrence. The heterogeneity in recurrence observed in other RCTs could be explained by the scarce and heterogeneous adoption of tools and techniques that have been proved to lower the recurrence rate, supporting the need for implementation of a TURBT checklist. This prompted us to create a checklist of items for RCTs to standardize how TURBT is performed in trials, facilitate comparison between studies, assess the applicability of results in real-life practice, and provide a push towards high-quality resections to improve oncological outcomes. The checklist could have utility as a user-friendly guide for reporting TURBT procedures to improve our understanding of trials involving this procedure.

Patient summary

We compared the recurrence rate at 1 year for bladder cancer treated with two different approaches to remove bladder tumors in our center. The rates were comparable for the two groups. Other studies have found widely differing recurrence rates, so we propose use of a checklist to standardize these procedures and provide more consistent outcomes for patients.