1
|
Anderson RF, Sutherland HS, Marshall AJ. Chain-release of quinoline-based drugs from N-alkoxyquinoline prodrugs upon radiolytic one-electron reduction. Chem Commun (Camb) 2025. [PMID: 40491323 DOI: 10.1039/d5cc01641j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2025]
Abstract
Quinoline and isoquinoline prodrugs containing N-alkoxy substituents release the quinoline drug and a reducing radical upon radiolytic one-electron reduction in aqueous solution under anoxia. The radical reduces a further prodrug forming a long chain reaction producing high concentrations of the quinolines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert F Anderson
- Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
- School of Chemical Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| | - Hamish S Sutherland
- Auckland Cancer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
| | - Andrew J Marshall
- Ferrier Research Institute, Victoria University Wellington, Gracefield Innovation Quarter, Lower Hutt, Wellington 5010, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah C, Campbell SR, Murphy E, Braunstein S, Dietz MS, Binitie O, Kastenberg ZJ, Yanagawa J, Halpern J, Kis B, Hunt S, Yazdanpanah F, Gupta A, Trucco M. Consensus recommendations regarding local and metastasis-directed therapies in the management of relapsed/recurrent Ewing sarcoma. Cancer 2025; 131:e35858. [PMID: 40251761 PMCID: PMC12008482 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2025] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 04/21/2025]
Abstract
Limited randomized or prospective data are available to guide local/metastasis directed therapy (LMDT) in relapsed/recurrent Ewing sarcoma (RR-ES), resulting in uncertainty regarding best clinical practice for these patients. This report reviews the available literature on LMDT approaches and provides consensus recommendations regarding therapeutic decision making, timing, and indications for the use of LMDT in the management of RR-ES. LMDT should be considered on a case-by-case basis to assess appropriateness, optimal timing/modality, palliative versus curative intent, and its role in relation to chemotherapy. One commonly used LMDT is radiotherapy (RT), which can be delivered through standard, hypofractionated, or stereotactic techniques based on factors including prior RT, tumor size, and/or location. Chemotherapy can be combined with RT, although prospective data are limited in the relapse setting. Surgery for LMDT not only addresses the tumor but also provides tissue for analysis, though the potential surgical morbidity based on location, extent of resection, and recovery complications should be considered. Interventional radiology approaches also can procure tumor tissue while delivering LMDT; there are several different procedures available based on the location, size, and extent of disease. Finally, a combination of LMDT approaches can be used for patients with RR-ES. Decisions regarding the management of RR-ES should involve a multidisciplinary team and factor in the burden of disease, progression-free interval, life expectancy, toxicity profiles of LMDT, and quality of life. In such patients, informed and shared decision making with patients and their families is paramount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation OncologyTaussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyAllegheny Health NetworkPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Shauna R. Campbell
- Department of Radiation OncologyTaussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Erin Murphy
- Department of Radiation OncologyTaussig Cancer InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Steve Braunstein
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Matthew S. Dietz
- Department of PediatricsUniversity of UtahPrimary Children’s HospitalSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Odion Binitie
- Department of Orthopedic SurgeryH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFloridaUSA
| | - Zachary J. Kastenberg
- Division of Pediatric SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Jane Yanagawa
- Division of Thoracic SurgeryDepartment of SurgeryUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jennifer Halpern
- Department of Orthopedic SurgeryVanderbilt HealthNashvilleTennesseeUSA
| | - Bela Kis
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional RadiologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFloridaUSA
| | - Stephen Hunt
- Department of RadiologyHospital of University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Fereshteh Yazdanpanah
- Department of RadiologyHospital of University of PennsylvaniaUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Penn Image‐Guided Interventions LaboratoryPerelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaHospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Ajay Gupta
- Department of Pediatric OncologyRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterBuffaloNew YorkUSA
| | - Matteo Trucco
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow TransplantationCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barbour AB, Upadhyay R, Anderson AC, Kutuk T, Kumar R, Wang SJ, Psutka SP, Fekrmandi F, Skalina KA, Bruynzeel AME, Correa RJM, Dal Pra A, Biancia CD, Hannan R, Louie A, Singh AK, Swaminath A, Tang C, Teh BS, Zaorsky NG, Lo SS, Siva S. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case-Based Radiosurgery Society Practice Guide. Pract Radiat Oncol 2025; 15:74-85. [PMID: 39019209 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
Traditionally, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was considered a radioresistant tumor, thereby limiting definitive radiation therapy management options. However, several recent studies have demonstrated that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can achieve high rates of local control for the treatment of primary RCC. In the setting of expanding use of SBRT for primary RCC, it is crucial to provide guidance on practical considerations such as patient selection, fractionation, target delineation, and response assessment. This is particularly important in challenging scenarios where a paucity of evidence exists, such as in patients with a solitary kidney, bulky tumors, or tumor thrombus. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide to provide a practical framework for delivering SBRT to primary RCC, exemplified by 3 cases. This article explores topics of tumor size and dose fractionation, impact on renal function and treatment in the setting of a solitary kidney, and radiation's role in the management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Additionally, we review existing evidence and expert opinion on target delineation, advanced techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging guided SBRT, and SBRT response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Barbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - August C Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Ritesh Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Shang-Jui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Sarah P Psutka
- Department of Urology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Fatemeh Fekrmandi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Karin A Skalina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rohann J M Correa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Cesar Della Biancia
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Raquibul Hannan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Alexander Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Shankar Siva
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brown J, Harrow B, Marciniak A, McCarthy C, Houchard A, Cirneanu L, Protheroe A. Cabozantinib and Axitinib After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study from England. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2024; 11:195-207. [PMID: 38265633 PMCID: PMC11176148 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-023-00415-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The tyrosine kinase inhibitors cabozantinib and axitinib have been widely used in England to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma following prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy, but data on real-world usage remain limited. Our objective was to describe the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received second-line or later-line (≥ 2L) cabozantinib or axitinib after vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in clinical practice in England. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used clinical practice data (collected 2011-20) from the English Cancer Analysis System database. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence and duration, and overall survival (time from initiation of cabozantinib/axitinib treatment to death) were evaluated. RESULTS Data from 1485 eligible adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma were analyzed: 440 received ≥ 2L cabozantinib (2L for 88.6% of them); 1045 received ≥ 2L axitinib (2L for 89.5%). The most common first-line treatments were sunitinib (2L cabozantinib subcohort, 48%; 2L axitinib subcohort, 46%) and pazopanib (46% and 54%, respectively); nivolumab was the most common third-line treatment (18% and 19%, respectively). Median (interquartile range) 2L therapy duration was 5.52 (2.73-11.74) months for cabozantinib and 4.60 (1.45-12.36) months for axitinib. Following adjustment for potential confounders using inverse probability weighting, overall survival (median [interquartile range]) was longer for ≥ 2L cabozantinib (11.2 [5.7-28.0] months) than for ≥ 2L axitinib (10.4 [4.7-22.0] months; log-rank p = 0.0034). CONCLUSIONS The Cancer Analysis System database is a valuable research resource providing extensive real-world clinical data. Real-world overall survival was longer with ≥ 2L cabozantinib than with axitinib. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04637204; registered November 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Brown
- Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew Protheroe
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gross-Goupil M, Bodnar L, Campbell MT, Michael A, Venugopal B, Żołnierek J, Dutailly P, Procopio G, Albiges L. Cabozantinib in the Routine Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:84-97. [PMID: 38101983 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Real-world cabozantinib use has increased since its approval to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 2016. We reviewed cabozantinib use in real-world clinical practice and compared outcomes with pivotal cabozantinib randomized control trials (RCTs). This PRISMA-standard systematic literature review evaluated real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cabozantinib in patients with RCC (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021245854). Systematic MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane database searches were conducted on November 2, 2022. Eligible publications included ≥ 20 patients with RCC receiving cabozantinib. After double-screening for eligibility, standardized data were abstracted, qualitatively summarized, and assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of 353 screened publications, 41 were included, representing approximately 11,000 real-world patients. Most publications reported cabozantinib monotherapy cohort studies (40/41) of retrospective (39/41) and multicenter (32/41) design; most included patients from North America and/or Europe (30/41). Baseline characteristics were demographically similar between real-world and pivotal RCT populations, but real-world populations showed greater variation in prevalence of prior nephrectomy, multiple-site/brain metastasis, and nonclear-cell RCC histology. Cabozantinib activity was reported across real-world treatment lines and tumor types. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate values from pivotal RCTs were within the ranges reported for equivalent outcomes across real-world studies. Common real-world grade ≥ 3 adverse events were consistent with those in pivotal RCTs (fatigue, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension), but less frequent. No new tolerability concerns were identified. Real-world RCC survival outcomes for cabozantinib monotherapy were broadly consistent with pivotal RCTs, despite greater heterogeneity in real-world populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lubomir Bodnar
- University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, Institute of Health Sciences, Siedlce, Poland
| | | | - Agnieszka Michael
- University of Surrey, School of Biosciences and Medicine, Guildford, UK
| | - Balaji Venugopal
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kosydar SR, Parikh SA, Lester SC, Rabe KG, Ding W, Burlile JF, Kenderian SS, Wang Y, Muchtar E, Koehler AB, Schwager SM, Slager SL, Kay NE, Call TG, Breen WG, Hampel PJ. Safety of radiotherapy for second primary malignancies in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia receiving concurrent novel agent treatment. Am J Hematol 2023; 98:E318-E321. [PMID: 37614209 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel R Kosydar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sameer A Parikh
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kari G Rabe
- Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Wei Ding
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jessica F Burlile
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Saad S Kenderian
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yucai Wang
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eli Muchtar
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amber B Koehler
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Susan M Schwager
- Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Susan L Slager
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Computational Biology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Neil E Kay
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Timothy G Call
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Paul J Hampel
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang YC, Hsieh PY, Wang LY, Tsai TH, Chen YJ, Hsieh CH. Local Liver Irradiation Concurrently Versus Sequentially with Cabozantinib on the Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution in Rats. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24065849. [PMID: 36982920 PMCID: PMC10056485 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiotherapy (RT)-pharmacokinetics (PK) effect of cabozantinib in concurrent or sequential regimens with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Concurrent and sequential regimens involving RT and cabozantinib were designed. The RT–drug interactions of cabozantinib under RT were confirmed in a free-moving rat model. The drugs were separated on an Agilent ZORBAX SB-phenyl column with a mobile phase consisting of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH2PO4)–methanol solution (27:73, v/v) for cabozantinib. There were no statistically significant differences in the concentration versus time curve of cabozantinib (AUCcabozantinib) between the control group and the RT2Gy×3 f’x and RT9Gy×3 f’x groups in the concurrent and the sequential regimens. However, compared to those in the control group, the Tmax, T1/2 and MRT decreased by 72.8% (p = 0.04), 49.0% (p = 0.04) and 48.5% (p = 0.04) with RT2Gy×3 f’x in the concurrent regimen, respectively. Additionally, the T1/2 and MRT decreased by 58.8% (p = 0.01) and 57.8% (p = 0.01) in the concurrent RT9Gy×3 f’x group when compared with the control group, respectively. The biodistribution of cabozantinib in the heart increased by 271.4% (p = 0.04) and 120.0% (p = 0.04) with RT2Gy×3 f’x in the concurrent and sequential regimens compared to the concurrent regimen, respectively. Additionally, the biodistribution of cabozantinib in the heart increased by 107.1% (p = 0.01) with the RT9Gy×3 f’x sequential regimen. Compared to the RT9Gy×3 f’x concurrent regimen, the RT9Gy×3 f’x sequential regimen increased the biodistribution of cabozantinib in the heart (81.3%, p = 0.02), liver (110.5%, p = 0.02), lung (125%, p = 0.004) and kidneys (87.5%, p = 0.048). No cabozantinib was detected in the brain in any of the groups. The AUC of cabozantinib is not modulated by irradiation and is not affected by treatment strategies. However, the biodistribution of cabozantinib in the heart is modulated by off-target irradiation and SBRT doses simultaneously. The impact of the biodistribution of cabozantinib with RT9Gy×3 f’x is more significant with the sequential regimen than with the concurrent regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chuen Huang
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan (Y.-J.C.)
- School of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Ying Hsieh
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ying Wang
- School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 100, Taiwan
- Physical Therapy Center, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
| | - Tung-Hu Tsai
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan;
| | - Yu-Jen Chen
- Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan (Y.-J.C.)
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei 104, Taiwan
- Department of Artificial Intelligence and Medical Application, MacKay Junior College of Medicine, Nursing, and Management, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Hsi Hsieh
- Institute of Traditional Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan;
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rizzo M, Porta C. Concurrent Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Antiangiogenic Targeted Agents: Redefining the Therapeutic Strategy. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 6:212-213. [PMID: 36522250 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|