Co-occurring BRCA2/SPOP Mutations Predict Exceptional Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor Sensitivity in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

SPOP mutations increase PARP inhibitor sensitivity via CK2/PIAS1/SPOP axis in prostate cancer

It is well documented that impaired DNA damage repair (DDR) induces genomic instability that can efficiently increase the sensitivity of prostate cancer (PCa) cells to PARP inhibitors; however, the underlying mechanism remains elusive. Here, we found profound genomic instability in PCa cells with SPOP gene mutations and confirmed the sensitivity of SPOP-mutated PCa cells to olaparib-induced apoptosis. Mechanistically, we identified olaparib-induced CK2-mediated phosphorylation of PIAS1-S468, which in turn mediated SUMOylation of SPOP, thus promoting its E3 ligase activity in the DDR. Moreover, an abnormal CK2/PIAS1/SPOP axis due to SPOP mutations or defects in CK2-mediated phosphorylation of PIAS1, as well as SPOP inhibitor treatment, led to impaired DDR, thus increasing olaparib-induced apoptosis of PCa cells and enhancing olaparib sensitivity in animal models and patient-derived organoids. This suggested that disruption of the CK2/PIAS1/SPOP signaling axis could serve as an indicator for targeted therapy of PCa using a PARP inhibitor.

Combination niraparib and abiraterone for HRR-altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Metastatic prostate cancer remains incurable. Though significant progress has been made in the field, the search for agents that improve outcomes for patients is ongoing. Several clinical trials have explored the benefit of combining PARP inhibitors (PARPi) with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), especially those cancers with alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Niraparib, a highly selective inhibitor of PARP1 and PARP2, has been shown to confer a radiographic progression-free survival benefit in the treatment of mCRPC with HRR-associated gene alterations, particularly BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2), when combined with abiraterone acetate plus prednisolone (AAP). This combination has recently been approved in the USA, Canada and Europe for patients with mCRPC and a BRCA1/2 gene mutation. This review summarizes the evidence with regards to the pharmacologic activity and clinical efficacy of niraparib with a specific focus on its efficacy in combination with AAP in mCRPC patients with HRR alterations.

SPOP enhances FADD degradation and decreases the activeness of the NF-κB signaling pathway in prostate cancer: an in vitro study

Background

Speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP), FAS-associated protein with death domain (FADD), and nuclear transcription factor-κB (NF-κB) have been shown to be associated with the development of prostate cancer (PCa). FADD has been shown to activate the NF-κB pathway to promote tumorigenesis, while SPOP has been shown to enhance the breakdown of FADD and inhibit the function of the NF-κB signaling pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. The existence of this mechanism has not yet been confirmed in PCa. This study aimed to explore the mechanism by which SPOP regulates FADD and the NF-κB signaling pathway in PCa.

Methods

Western blot was used to detect the presence of SPOP and FADD in both PCa cells and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) cells. The biological behavior of the PC3 cells with altered levels of SPOP was examined using methods such as Cell Counting Kit 8, flow cytometry, and Transwell assay, and the effects of altering SPOP expression levels on the expression of FADD and NF-κB were assessed by western blot. The interaction between SPOP and FADD was detected by immunoprecipitation assay. The SPOP-overexpression PC3 cells were treated with MG132 inhibitor, and the expression of FADD was detected by western blot. A nude mice model of tumor of PCa with SPOP-overexpression was established, growth of the tumor was observed, and pathology of the tumor was diagnosed. Western blot was used to detect the expression of FADD and NF-κB in the tumor tissues.

Results

The PCa cells displayed decreased SPOP expression and increased FADD expression compared to the BPH cells (P<0.05). Additionally, the SPOP-silencing PC3 cells had higher levels of FADD and NF-κB expression than the SPOP-overexpression cells (P<0.05). Proliferation, migration, and invasion activities were lower in the SPOP-overexpression PC3 cells than the SPOP-silencing PC3 cells (P<0.05), and the apoptosis rate was higher in the SPOP-overexpression PC3 cells than the SPOP-silencing PC3 cells (P<0.05). There was an interaction between FADD and SPOP in the PC3 cells. After treatment with MG132, the expression of FADD rebounded compared with that before the treatment in the SPOP-overexpression PC3 cells (P<0.05). The volume and weight of the SPOP-overexpression PC3 tumors in the animal models were smaller than those of the control group (P<0.05). The pathological diagnosis revealed that the SPOP-overexpression tumors had more necrosis, and the expression of FADD and NF-κB in the PCa tumors was reduced when SPOP was overexpressed (P<0.05).

Conclusions

There may be a SPOP-FADD-NF-κB regulatory axis in PCa. SPOP facilitates the degradation of FADD, leading to a decrease in the activity of the NF-κB signaling pathway.

Recent and Future Developments in the Use of Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is enriched for alterations in DNA damage repair genes; poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are a class of drugs that have demonstrated effectiveness in PCa, particularly in tumors with alterations in BRCA1/2 and other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes, acting through a synthetic lethal mechanism. To prevent or delay drug resistance, and to expand the patient population that can benefit from this class of drug, combination treatment strategies have been developed in preclinical and clinical studies.

METHODS

This review examines the latest developments in clinical trials testing PARPi for advanced PCa and their emerging role in earlier disease settings. Furthermore, it discusses the critical role of careful patient selection and identification of additional biomarkers to enhance treatment efficacy.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Two PARPi (olaparib and rucaparib) have been approved as monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant PCa, thereby establishing the first biomarker-guided drug indications in PCa. Several combinations of PARPi with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors have now also been approved. Anemia and fatigue are the main adverse events associated with this drug class in clinical trials; gastrointestinal toxicities are common but usually manageble.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

PARPi are active against PCa with HRR mutations, especially in those with germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations.  There is still a need to further optimize patient stratification strategies, particularly for combination approaches. Future research should focus on refining predictive biomarkers, improving treatment delivery strategies, and exploring the potential benefits of PARPi in earlier stages of the disease.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Here, we summarize the results from clinical trials testing different poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), a novel targeted drug class, in prostate cancer. Overall, the data from these trials confirm the efficacy of this drug class in those metastatic prostate cancers that show specific gene alterations, such as mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes. Several studies combining PARPi with other standard drugs for prostate cancer suggest that there may be efficacy in larger patient populations, but some of these data still need validation in longer follow-up analyses.

Prognostic and Predictive Role of SPOP Mutations in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Mutations in the speckle-type POZ (SPOP) gene are frequently identified in prostate cancer (PC); yet, prognostic implications for affected patients remain unclear. Limited consensus exists regarding tailored treatments for SPOP-mutant (SPOPmut) PC.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the prognostic and predictive significance of SPOP mutations across distinct PC stages and treatments.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus was conducted up to January 29, 2024. The meta-analysis included studies comparing survival outcomes between SPOPmut and SPOP wild-type (SPOPwt) PC.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From 669 records, 26 studies (including five abstracts) were analyzed. A meta-analysis of metastasis-free survival in localized (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.88; p < 0.01) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic PC (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.76; p < 0.01) showed a favorable prognosis for patients with SPOPmut PC. In metastatic settings, SPOP mutations correlated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy ± androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.35-0.76, p < 0.01, and HR: 0.60, 95% CI:0.46-0.79, p < 0.01, respectively). In metastatic castration-resistant PC, only abiraterone provided improved PFS and OS to patients with SPOP mutations compared with patients with SPOPwt, but data were limited. SPOP mutations did not correlate with improved PFS (p = 0.80) or OS (p = 0.27) for docetaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SPOPmut PC seem to exhibit superior oncological outcomes compared with patients with SPOPwt. Tailored risk stratification and treatment approaches should be explored in such patients.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Speckle-type POZ (SPOP) mutations could be a favorable prognostic factor in patients with prostate cancer (PC) and may also predict better progression-free and overall survival than treatment with hormonal agents. Therefore, less intensified treatments omitting chemotherapy for patients with SPOP-mutant PC should be explored in clinical trials.

PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms and PARP inhibitor derived imaging probes

INTRODUCTION

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibition has become a major target in anticancer therapy. While PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for homologous recombination (HR) deficient cancers, therapeutic resistance is a challenge and PARPi are now being investigated in cancers lacking HR deficiencies. This creates a need to develop molecular and imaging biomarkers of PARPi response to improve patient selection and circumvent therapeutic resistance.

AREAS COVERED

PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were queried for studies on PARPi resistance and imaging. This review summarizes established and emerging resistance mechanisms to PARPi, and the current state of imaging and theragnostic probes for PARPi, including fluorescently labeled and radiolabeled probes.

EXPERT OPINION

While progress has been made in understanding PARPi therapeutic resistance, clinical evidence remains lacking and relatively little is known regarding PARPi response outside of HR deficiencies. Continued research will clarify the importance of known biomarkers and resistance mechanisms in patient cohorts and the broader utility of PARPi. Progress has also been made in PARPi imaging, particularly with radiolabeled probes, and both imaging and theragnostic probes have now reached clinical validation. Reducing abdominal background signal from probe clearance will broaden their applicability, and improvements to molecular synthesis and radiation delivery will increase their utility.

Integrating PARP Inhibitors in mCRPC Therapy: Current Strategies and Emerging Trends

Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is associated with poor prognosis. DNA damage response (DDR) genes are commonly altered in mCRPC rendering them as promising therapeutic targets. Poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) demonstrated antitumor activity in mCRPC patients with DDR gene mutations through synthetic lethality. Multiple clinical trials with PARPi monotherapy exhibited encouraging clinical outcomes in selected patients with mCRPC. More recently, three Phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) combining PARPi with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) demonstrated improved antitumor activity compared to ARSI monotherapy in mCRPC patients as the first-line therapy. Clinical benefit was more pronounced in patients harboring DDR alterations, specifically BRCA1/2. Interestingly, antitumor activity was also observed irrespective of DDR gene mutations, highlighting BRCAness phenotype with androgen receptor blockade resulting in synergistic activity between ARSIs and PARPi. In this review, we discuss the clinical efficacy and safety data of the combination of PARPi plus ARSI in all Phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), emphasizing strategies for patient selection and highlighting emerging trends based on clinical trial data.

Durable benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in metastatic prostate cancer in routine practice: biomarker associations and implications for optimal clinical next-generation sequencing testing

BACKGROUND

Controlled trials have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and BRCA1 or BRCA2 alterations (BRCAalt). However, the reported efficacy of PARPi for alterations in other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes is less consistent. We sought to evaluate the routine practice effectiveness of PARPi between and within these groups.

DESIGN

Patient-level data from a deidentified nationwide (USA-based) cancer clinico-genomic database between January 2011 and September 2023 were extracted. Patients with mCRPC and comprehensive genomic profiling by liquid biopsy [circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)] or tissue (tumor) biopsy and who received single-agent PARPi were included and grouped by BRCAalt, ATMalt, other HRR, or no HRR. We further subcategorized BRCAalt into homozygous loss (BRCAloss) and all other deleterious BRCAalt (otherBRCAalt).

RESULTS

A total of 445 patients met inclusion criteria: 214 with tumor and 231 with ctDNA. BRCAalt had more favorable outcomes to PARPi compared with ATM, other HRR, and no HRR groups. Within the BRCAalt subgroup, compared with other BRCAalt, BRCAloss had a more favorable time to next treatment (median 9 versus 19.4 months, P = 0.005), time to treatment discontinuation (median 8 versus 14 months, P = 0.006), and routine practice overall survival (median 14.7 versus 19.4 months, P = 0.016). Tumor BRCAloss prevalence (3.1%) was similar to ctDNA prevalence in liquid biopsy specimens with high tumor fraction (>20%). BRCAloss was not detected in orthogonal germline testing.

CONCLUSIONS

PARPi routine practice effectiveness between groups mirrors prospective trials. Within the BRCAalt group, BRCAloss had the best outcomes. Unless the ctDNA tumor fraction is very high, somatic tissue testing (archival or metastatic) should be prioritized to identify patients who may benefit most from PARPi. When tissue testing is not clinically feasible, sufficient ctDNA tumor fraction levels for detection are enriched at clinical timepoints associated with tumor progression.