Validation of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale in community-dwelling elderly people (LEFS-Greek); determination of functional status cut-off points using TUG test

Treatment of Large Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects With Plate-Assisted Bone Segment Transport

OBJECTIVES

The purposes of this study were to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes following plate-assisted bone segment transport (PABST) in large bone defects of the lower extremities.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective study of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Level-1 trauma center located in Germany.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients who underwent PABST and were at least 1 year postoperatively were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Demographic data were collected. Radiographic apparent bone gap (RABG), time to consolidation, time to full weight-bearing, and consolidation index were calculated. Numeric rating scale, lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients [13 male; mean age 51 years (range, 20-75)] underwent PABST and had follow-up at a mean of 29.1 months. The tibia was affected in 8 and the femur in 7 patients. Preoperative RABG was 60 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 40-125], and bone defects were caused by septic nonunions in 73% of patients. Fourteen patients (93%) demonstrated consolidated transport callus at 7.3 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 6-8.5], and 9 patients (60%) demonstrated complete consolidation of both docking site and transport callus at 11.5 months (95% CI, 7.3-15.3). Postoperative RABG was 0.1 mm (IQR: 0-0.8), and consolidation index was 1.9 months/cm (95% CI, 1.3-2.5). All patients achieved full weight-bearing at 8.7 months (IQR: 6.5-10.3). LEFS was 42 (95% CI, 34-50), and numeric rating scale was 3 (95% CI, 2-4). Patients treated for tibial defects had a significantly higher consolidation rate compared with patients treated for femoral defects ( P = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

PABST demonstrated high consolidation of transport callus with few complications. Although full weight-bearing was achieved in all patients, complete consolidation of the docking site was only present in 60% of cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pre- and Postoperative Exercise Effectiveness in Mobility, Hemostatic Balance, and Prognostic Biomarkers in Hip Fracture Patients: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Hip fractures are a major health concern, particularly for older adults, as they can reduce life quality, mobility loss, and even death. Current evidence reveals that early intervention is recommended for endurance in patients with hip fractures. To our knowledge, preoperative exercise intervention in patients with hip fractures remains poorly researched, and no study has yet applied aerobic exercise preoperatively. This study aims to investigate the short-term benefits of a supervised preoperative aerobic moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) program and the added effect of an 8-week postoperative MIIT aerobic exercise program with a portable upper extremity cycle ergometer. The work-to-recovery ratio will be 1-to-1, consisting of 120 s for each bout and four and eight rounds for the pre- and postoperative programs, respectively. The preoperative program will be delivered twice a day. A parallel group, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was planned to be conducted with 58 patients each in the intervention and control groups. This study has two primary purposes. First, to study the effect of a preoperative aerobic exercise program with a portable upper extremity cycle ergometer on immediate postoperative mobility. Second, to investigate the additional effect of an 8-week postoperative aerobic exercise program with a portable upper extremity cycle ergometer on the walking distance at eight weeks after surgery. This study also has several secondary objectives, such as ameliorating surgical and keeping hemostatic balance throughout exercise. This study may expand our knowledge of preoperative exercise effectiveness in hip fracture patients and enhance the current literature about early intervention benefits.

Modified Harris Hip Score as patient-reported outcome measure in osteoarthritic patients: psychometric properties of the Greek version

INTRODUCTION

This study explored the psychometric properties of the modified Harris Hip Score-Greek version (mHHS-Gr) as a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure in osteoarthritic hip patients.

METHODS

Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and reproducibility were evaluated in 90 patients aged >55 years. Construct validity was tested against Greek versions of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-Greek) and WOMAC Index (WOMAC-Gr), and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and 9-stairs-ascend/descend (9S-A/D) tests. Known-groups validity was examined using TUG score (cut-off 13.5 s) as an estimate variable. Responsiveness was examined before and 4 weeks after direct anterior minimal invasive surgery.

RESULTS

Reliability: Internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach's a = 0.614, p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.881, 95% CI, 0.824-0.920). Reproducibility: Floor and ceiling effects were both 1.1%; measurement error was 3.54 (p < 0.05); minimal important change was lower than minimal detectable change.Validity: mHHS-Gr correlated strongly with both LEFS-Greek and WOMAC-Gr (Pearson's r 0.801 and -0.783, respectively; p < 0.001). The questionnaire's correlations with TUG and 9S-A/D were also significant but moderate (Spearman's ρ: -0.547 and -0.575, respectively; p < 0.001). Known-groups validity showed that mHHS-Gr scores were significantly higher in participants with TUG < 13.5 seconds than in those with TUG > 13.5 seconds (p < 0.001). In ROC analysis, the cut-off point of 52.5 yielded sensitivity 81% and specificity 71%.Responsiveness: Standardised response mean and Guyatt's responsiveness statistic were greater than 0.8.

DISCUSSION

mHHS-Gr showed significant moderate to excellent reliability, significant moderate to strong validity properties and excellent responsiveness. Overall, mHHS-Gr could be a reliable and valid PRO measure for assessing patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.

International Hip Outcome Tool (12-items) as health-related quality-of-life measure in osteoarthritis: validation of Greek version

BACKGROUND

The 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT12) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) designed to evaluate quality of life. We assessed the psychometric properties of the Greek version (iHOT12-Gr) in hip osteoarthritic patients.

METHODS

Data from 124 patients aged > 50 years were used for factor analysis. Reliability evaluation included internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and interpretability. Content validity was examined by calculating the item-level content validity indices (I-CVI) and the scale-level content validity indices (S-CVI), using two methods: S-CVI Average (S-CVI/Ave), and the S-CVI Universal Agreement among experts (S-CVI/UA). Construct validity was tested against Greek versions of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS-Greek), Modified Harris Hip Score (MHHS-Gr), and the 30 s chair-to-stand, Timed Up & Go (TUG), and 9-stairs-ascend/descend (9S-A/D) tests. Known-groups validity was examined using LEFS-Greek (cut-off = 53 points) as estimate variable. Responsiveness was examined pre and post total hip arthroplasty (4 and 8 weeks).

RESULTS

Factor analysis revealed a two-factor model. Factor-1 (items 1-9) reflects "Symptoms and functionality", while Factor-2 (items 10-12) reflects "Hip disorder-related concerns". Reliability: Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of iHOT12-Gr-total were excellent: Cronbach's alpha > 0.92 and ICC(95% CI) > 0.976(0.96-0.99)(p < 0.001). Interpretability: There was no floor or ceiling effect; measurement error: 3.72 (Factor-1), 3.64 (Factor-2), and 3.22 (iHOT12-Gr-total); minimal detectable change: 10.3 (Factor-1), 10.1 (Factor-2), and 8.92 (iHOT12-Gr-total).

VALIDITY

Content validity: The I-CVI value of the 12 items ranged from 1.00 to 0.83, the S-CVI/Ave was 0.97 and the S-CVI/UA was 0.83. Construct validity: iHOT12-Gr correlated strongly with both LEFS-Greek and MHHS-Gr, and weakly but significantly with 30s chair-to-stand, TUG and 9S-A/D (p < 0.001). Known-groups validity showed that iHOT12-Gr well discriminated subgroups of patients (p < 0.001). ROC analysis cut-off points were 51.9 (Factor-1), 25 (Factor-2) and 45.2 (iHOT12-Gr-total) (p < 0.001). Responsiveness: Four and 8 weeks postoperatively, standardized response means of Factor-1, Factor-2, and iHOT12-Gr-total were > 0.8.

CONCLUSION

iHOT12-Gr showed excellent reliability properties. The content validity was excellent and significant weak-to-strong correlations were found regarding construct validity. The known-group validity was also significant, while the responsiveness was excellent. iHOT12-Gr could be a reliable and valid PRO for assessing quality of life in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale in patients with different lower limb musculoskeletal dysfunctions

Background/Aims

Lower extremity functional scales in Turkish are limited in number and generalisability. The aims of this study were to translate the Lower Extremity Functional Scale into Turkish, and to investigate its reliability and validity in patients with different musculoskeletal conditions in their lower extremities.

Methods

The Turkish Lower Extremity Functional Scale, Visual Analogue Scale and Timed Up and Go test were administered in 256 outpatients with a re-test after 24–48 hours. Internal consistency, test–retest reliability, construct validity, factor structure and floor-ceiling effects were investigated.

Findings

The Scale has good reliability and validity. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.91 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.923. The standard error of measurement value was 4.015 and internal consistency coefficient was 0.92. Item-total correlation values were 0.46–0.74. It had a 3-factor structure, explaining 58.51% of the total variance and the eigenvalues were 1.04–8.26. It had no floor and ceiling effects, and was negatively correlated with the Visual Analogue Scale and Timed Up and Go test (P=0.000).

Conclusions

The Turkish Lower Extremity Functional Scale is a reliable and valid tool to be used in participants with lower extremity musculoskeletal dysfunctions. Evaluation of its responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference in future studies would have a great value.

The Effect of Intensive Abductor Strengthening on Postoperative Muscle Efficiency and Functional Ability of Hip-Fractured Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are common in the elderly and many patients fail to regain prefracture hip abductor strength or functional status. The purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the effects of an intensive abductor muscle exercise program versus a standard physiotherapy intervention in hip-fractured patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety six femoral neck-fractured patients were randomized into equal-sized groups. A 12-week standard physiotherapy program was implemented in the control group(S-PT) whereas an intensive exercise program, emphasizing on abductors' strengthening, was implemented in the research group(I-PT). Abductors' isometric strength of the fractured hip, abductor ratio% in the fractured compared to contralateral hip, and functional level were assessed at the 3^rd (postintervention) and 6^th (followup) months.

RESULTS

Postintervention, abductors' isometric strength was 35.7% greater (P < 0.0005) and abductor ratio% was 2.5% higher (P < 0.0005) in I-PT group, compared to S-PT group. With regard to functional assessments, I-PT group was 29.1% faster during Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and achieved a 26.7% higher Lower Extremity Functional Scale Greek version's (LEFS-Greek) total score, compared to S-PT group (P < 0.0005). At followup, abductors' isometric strength was 37.0% greater (P < 0.0005) and abductor ratio% was 7.1% higher (P < 0.0005) in I-PT group, compared to S-PT group. In addition, I-PT group was 45.9% faster during TUG test (P < 0.0005) and achieved an 11.2% higher LEFS-Greek total score, compared to S-PT group (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the standard physiotherapy intervention, the intensive abductor-strengthening program significantly increased both abductors' isometric strength of the fractured hip and abductor ratio% and resulted in patients' enhanced functional level.

CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER

ISRCTN30713542.