Psychopharmacological prescribing practices in pregnancy for women with severe mental illness: A multicentre study

Prescribing Patterns for the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Untreated bipolar disorder during pregnancy is associated with poor prenatal care, decreased fetal growth, and an increased risk for postnatal complications, including postpartum psychosis. Although mood stabilizers are first-line therapy, many patients and providers discontinue them in early pregnancy. Antidepressants as monotherapy can increase the risk of mania and rapid cycling, especially in patients with bipolar I, and are not recommended. Objective: This study aims to describe prescribing patterns for the pharmacologic management of bipolar disorder in pregnancy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included pregnant patients, ≥14 years old, with a documented diagnosis of bipolar disorder and ≥two clinic visits after 1 January 2014, who delivered by 31 October 2017, within our health system. Eligible patients were identified by the ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for bipolar disorder and their medication profiles. The primary outcome was to describe bipolar disorder treatment regimens at first visit, during pregnancy, and at delivery. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Of the 214 pregnancies analyzed, 134 (62.6%) used psychiatric medications during pregnancy, with 79/134 (59%) being mood stabilizers. During the initial visit, 61/214 (28.5%) pregnancies were on psychiatric medications, including 30 (49.2%) on mood stabilizers and 16 (26.2%) on antidepressants alone. At delivery, 98/214 (45.8%) pregnancies were on psychiatric medications, with 48/98 (49%) on mood stabilizers and 35/98 (35.7%) on antidepressants without mood stabilizers. Other therapies included benzodiazepines, buspirone, and amphetamines, as monotherapy or combination. Conclusions: Despite having documented bipolar disorder, only 30/214 (14%), 79/214 (36.9%), and 48/214 (22.4%) pregnancies were treated with mood stabilizers at the first visit, during pregnancy, and at delivery, respectively. Unfortunately, justification for discontinuation was not documented. The most commonly prescribed mood stabilizer was lurasidone, followed by lamotrigine. Antidepressant monotherapy persisted throughout pregnancy, demonstrating inappropriate disease management.

Lithium Use During Pregnancy in 14 Countries

Importance

In pregnancy, the benefits of lithium treatment for relapse prevention in psychiatric conditions must be weighed against potential teratogenic effects. Currently, there is a paucity of information on how and when lithium is used by pregnant women.

Objective

To examine lithium use in the perinatal period.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used individual-level data of pregnancies from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021, in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, Iceland, Israel, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK, and 2 cohorts in the US. Analyses were performed from September 1 to November 30, 2023.

Exposures

The prevalence of lithium use as the proportion of pregnancies with at least 1 prescription fill or prescription within 3 months before pregnancy until childbirth was estimated using a common protocol. Lithium use during pregnancy by trimester and in the 3 months before and after pregnancy was examined.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Comparison of prevalence between the first and last 3-year periods of available data.

Results

Among 21 659 454 pregnancies from all collaborating sites, the prevalence of lithium use ranged from 0.07 per 1000 pregnancies in Hong Kong to 1.56 per 1000 in the US publicly insured population. Lithium use increased per 1000 pregnancies in 10 populations (Australia [0.60 to 0.74], Denmark [0.09 to 0.51], Finland [0.10 to 0.29], Iceland [0.24 to 0.99], Israel [0.25 to 0.37], Norway [0.24 to 0.47], South Korea [0.30 to 0.44], Sweden [0.42 to 1.07], the UK [0.07 to 0.10], and Taiwan [0.15 to 0.19]), remained stable in 4 populations (Germany [0.17 to 0.16], Hong Kong [0.06 to 0.06], and the publicly [1.50 to 1.34] and commercially [0.38 to 0.36] insured US populations), and decreased in 1 population (New Zealand [0.54 to 0.39]). Use of lithium decreased with each trimester of pregnancy, while prevalence of postpartum use was similar to prepregnancy levels. The proportion of lithium use in the second trimester compared with the prepregnancy period ranged from 2% in South Korea to 80% in Denmark.

Conclusions and Relevance

Prevalence of lithium use in pregnant women over the past 2 decades varied markedly between populations. Patterns of use before, during, and after pregnancy suggest that many women discontinued lithium use during pregnancy and reinitiated treatment after childbirth, with large variations between countries. These findings underscore the need for internationally harmonized guidelines, specifically for psychiatric conditions among pregnant women that may benefit from lithium treatment.

Pharmacotherapy and electroconvulsive therapy prescription for women with depressive and anxiety disorders in a psychiatric mother-baby unit

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to understand the pharmacotherapy and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) prescription of women with depression and anxiety admitted to an Australian inpatient psychiatric mother-baby unit (MBU) and compare prescription to national clinical practice guidelines.

METHOD

A retrospective audit was conducted on women diagnosed with depression or anxiety admitted to a public psychiatric inpatient MBU from March 2017 to July 2019. Data was captured at three time points to assess demographic, clinical and pharmacotherapy treatment characteristics. Descriptive statistics were completed.

RESULTS

Of the 74 women, 57 women had depression, with 73% prescribed Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and 14% provided ECT during admission. For women with anxiety (n = 17), 23% were prescribed a benzodiazepine with concurrent antidepressant prescription. SSRI prescription increased, with other antidepressant prescription up trending through admission. Atypical antipsychotic prescription was increased initially and trended downwards at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

This study explored the therapeutic armamentarium employed for the treatment of mothers admitted to an inpatient psychiatric MBU with depression and anxiety. The results point to the intricate prescribing practices in a naturalistic setting and highlight that prescribing practices were in line with national guidelines.

Advances in Psychotropic Treatment for Pregnant Women: Efficacy, Adverse Outcomes, and Therapeutic Monitoring

Advancements in psychotropic therapy for pregnant women are pivotal for addressing maternal mental health during the perinatal period. Screening for mood and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy is recommended to enable early intervention. Psychotropic medications, including antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers, are commonly used, but challenges remain regarding their safety and efficacy during pregnancy. Pregnancy induces significant changes in pharmacokinetics, necessitating personalized dosing strategies and careful monitoring. Real-time monitoring technologies, such as smartphone-integrated platforms and home-based monitoring, enhance accessibility and accuracy. Prospective studies and collaboration among healthcare providers are essential for evidence-based guidelines and optimal treatment strategies. Reducing stigma around mental health during pregnancy is crucial to ensure women seek help and discuss treatment options, promoting understanding and acceptance within the community.

Sex Differences Between Female and Male Individuals in Antipsychotic Efficacy and Adverse Effects in the Treatment of Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotics are core treatments for people living with psychotic disorders. Understanding individualised factors that influence both efficacy and adverse responses will improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to examine sex differences in antipsychotic-related efficacy and tolerability.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of data from phase 1 and 1a of Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE); participants with schizophrenia were randomly assigned to double-blinded treatment with oral olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone or perphenazine. Measures included Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale and Calgary Depression Rating Scale, as well as self-reported side effects, medication compliance, dosage, weight measurements and various blood parameters.

RESULTS

There were 1460 participants including 380 female and 1080 male individuals. Very few differences existed between male and female participants in response, adverse reactions, compliance or antipsychotic dosage. However, significantly more female participants than male participants reported constipation (28% vs 16%), dry mouth (50% vs 38%), gynecomastia/galactorrhea (11% vs 3%), incontinence/nocturia (16% vs 8%) and self reported weight gain (37% vs 24%) [all p < 0.001]. Within the risperidone treatment group, there was a significantly greater increase in prolactin levels (p < 0.001) among female participants (n = 61) than male participants (n = 159). No overall differences in clinician-rated measures, weight gain or other laboratory indicators were found.

CONCLUSIONS

While overall sex differences were limited across efficacy and tolerability for antipsychotic treatment, there were some specific findings with risperidone. Further examination of sex differences within antipsychotic trials will be important to improve efficacy and reduce adverse responses across as well as individualising care for people with schizophrenia.

Prophylactic Management of Women With Bipolar Disorder During Pregnancy and the Perinatal Period: Clinical Scenario-Based Practical Recommendations From A Group of Perinatal Psychiatry Authors

ABSTRACT

Many women with bipolar disorder experience episodes of illness or relapses over the perinatal period, especially in the immediate postpartum period. Risks associated with treated/untreated psychopathologies and fetal exposure to bipolar medications make the management of bipolar disorder during these periods challenging for clinicians and patients. In light of the available effectiveness and reproductive safety data, the current clinical update based on the opinions of a group of international perinatal psychiatry authors recommends general considerations and specific management strategies for each possible clinical scenario, including mixed features, predominant polarity, diagnosis of subtypes of bipolar disorder, severity of previous episodes, and risk of recurrence of mood episodes.

Prevalence, trends, and characteristics of polypharmacy among US pregnant women aged 15 to 44 years: NHANES 1999 to 2016

Polypharmacy has become a major health issue for pregnant woman due to the increased trend of medication use during pregnancy. However, data on medication use in pregnancy are limited since pregnant women are rarely included in clinical trials. Our study aimed to investigate the trends of and characteristics associated with polypharmacy among pregnant women in the US. This study was conducted using data from The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the US. Nine The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles between 1999 and 2016 were used to identify pregnant women aged 15 to 44 years. Polypharmacy was defined as more than 1 medication prescription used during pregnancy. Descriptive statistics were used to report the prevalence and trends of polypharmacy. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate characteristics associated with polypharmacy among US pregnant women. Among 3,350,983 US pregnant women, about 7.4% of them (247,525) experienced polypharmacy. The prevalence of polypharmacy increased from 2.8% (1999-2000) to 10.0% (2015-2016) (P < .01) over-the time period examined in this study. Pregnant women were less likely to have experienced polypharmacy than were nonpregnant women (7.4% vs 23.5%, P < .01). Levothyroxine and albuterol were 2 prescriptions commonly taken by pregnant women. Pregnant women who were non-Hispanic white (P < .05) or had asthma (P < .05) or diabetes (P < .01) were more likely to report polypharmacy. Regarding personal characteristics, women with a poor or fair self-reported general health condition (odds ratio: 5.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.23-21.34) and those with chronic conditions (odds ratio: 6.91, 95% confidence interval: 3.08-15.50) were found to be associated with polypharmacy. An increased trend of polypharmacy was found in the US from 1999 to 2016. Non-Hispanic white pregnant women with a poor health status and chronic diseases were at an increased risk of polypharmacy.

The Patterns of Antipsychotic Use for Pregnant Women Over a 16-year Timeframe in an Australian Principal Referral and Specialist Women and Newborn Hospital

The purpose of the study is to analyse the patterns of antipsychotic use for pregnant women in an Australian Principal Referral and Specialist Women and Newborn Hospital. This retrospective, observational study involved an analysis of dispensing data of antipsychotics from 1998 to 2014 extracted from the pharmacy dispensing systems. The study included 282 antipsychotic dispensings in the years 1999 to 2006 and 3041 dispensings in the years 2007 to 2014. Second-generation antipsychotic use during pregnancy increased over time, while first-generation-antipsychotics showed declining trend. The use of quetiapine has increased from 2.9% of total antipsychotic dispensings in 2002 up to 77.9% of total antipsychotic dispensings in 2008. Olanzapine use decreased from 78.1% in 2003 to around 20% since 2006. When comparing the age distribution, there was an increased proportion of patients receiving antipsychotics in the 30-39 age range in the second period of 2007 to 2014 compared to 1999 to 2006. The proportion of women on more than one antipsychotic increased from 5% (n = 8) to 9.8% (n = 81) when comparing between 1999 and 2006 and between 2007 and 2014. Our findings indicate a significant shift in prescribing patterns over the study period, with the increased use of antipsychotics, particularly the emergence of SGAs from 2007, changing trends in the use of specific medications as published findings on their safety profiles becomes evident, and more polypharmacy prescribing.

Antipsychotic utilization patterns in pregnant women with psychotic disorders: a 16-year population-based cohort study

Despite growing concern about reproductive safety of antipsychotics, there is a paucity of research specifically assessing prenatal antipsychotic prescribing practices for psychotic disorders. This population-based cohort study identified women aged 15-50 years with diagnosis of psychotic disorders, who delivered their first and singleton child between 2003-2018 in Hong Kong, with an aim to examine temporal trends and predictors of prenatal antipsychotic use as well as antipsychotic utilization patterns before and during pregnancy. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services. Of 804 women, 519 (65%) redeemed at least one prescription for antipsychotics during pregnancy. Older age at conception (25-34 years: OR 2.12 [95% CI 1.22-3.67]; 35-50 years: 2.52 [1.38-4.61]; 15-24 years as reference category) and antipsychotic treatment within 12 months pre-pregnancy (24.22 [16.23-36.16]) were significantly associated with prenatal antipsychotic use. Second-generation-antipsychotic (SGA) use during pregnancy increased over 16-year study period, while prenatal first-generation-antipsychotic (FGA) use showed declining trend. Overall antipsychotic and SGA use progressively decreased across pre-pregnancy and trimesters of pregnancy. Further analyses on antipsychotic use trajectories revealed that 87.4% (n = 459) of 529 women receiving antipsychotics in 12-month pre-pregnancy redeemed antipsychotic prescription during pregnancy, and 63.4% (n = 333) continued antipsychotic treatment throughout pregnancy. Only 7.5% of the cohort (n = 60) commenced antipsychotics in pregnancy. This is one of the few studies evaluating real-world prenatal antipsychotic utilization among women with psychotic disorders. Future research delineating risk conferred by illness-related factors and antipsychotic exposure on adverse maternal and fetal outcomes is warranted to facilitate treatment guideline development.

Place of the partial dopamine receptor agonist aripiprazole in the management of schizophrenia in adults: a Delphi consensus study

BACKGROUND

Aripiprazole is a second-generation antipsychotic, efficacious in patients with schizophrenia during acute episodes. Due to its pharmacological profile, aripiprazole may be of interest in patients with specific clinical profiles who have not been studied extensively in randomised clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To capture experience with aripiprazole in everyday psychiatric practice using the Delphi method in order to inform decision-making on the use of aripiprazole for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia in clinical situations where robust evidence from clinical trials is lacking.

METHODS

The scope of the survey was defined as the management of schizophrenia in adults. A systematic literature review was performed to identify the different clinical situations in which aripiprazole has been studied, and to describe the level of clinical evidence. Clinical profiles to include in the Delphi survey were selected if there was a clear interest in terms of medical need but uncertainty over the efficacy of aripiprazole. For each clinical profile retained, five to seven specific statements were generated and included in a questionnaire. The final 41-item questionnaire was proposed to a panel of 406 French psychiatrists with experience in the treatment of schizophrenia. Panellists rated their level of agreement using a Likert scale. A second round of voting on eleven items was organised to clarify points for which a consensus was not obtained in the first round.

RESULTS

Five clinical profiles were identified in the literature review (persistent negative symptoms, pregnancy, cognitive dysfunction, addictive comorbidity and clozapine resistance). Sixty-two psychiatrists participated in the first round of the Delphi survey and 33 in the second round. A consensus was obtained for 11 out of 41 items in the first round and for 9/11 items in the second round. According to the panellists' clinical experience, aripiprazole can be used as maintenance treatment for pregnant women, is relevant to preserve cognitive function and can be considered an option in patients with a comorbid addictive disorder or with persistent negative symptoms.

CONCLUSION

These findings may help physicians in choosing relevant ways to use aripiprazole and highlight areas where more research is needed to widen the evidence base.

Management of anorexia nervosa in pregnancy: a systematic and state-of-the-art review

Anorexia nervosa is a potentially severe, chronic, and relapsing mental disorder that is more common in women and girls during the reproductive years (usually defined as those aged 12-51 years). It is associated with suicide and mortality linked with the physical consequences of starvation. Although anorexia nervosa is a disorder of low prevalence, and even lower prevalence in pregnancy, it is associated with substantial risks for the mother and infant when under-recognised and undermanaged. Despite the complexity and risk of managing anorexia nervosa in pregnancy, few studies are available to guide care. We conducted a systematic review, identifying only eight studies that addressed the management of anorexia nervosa in pregnancy. These studies were case studies or case reports examining narrow aspects of management. Subsequently, we conducted a state-of-the-art review across research in relevant disciplines and areas of expertise for managing anorexia nervosa in pregnancy and synthesised the findings into recommendations and principles for multidisciplinary management of anorexia nervosa in pregnancy. These recommendations included a focus on the specialist mental health, obstetric, medical, and nutritional care required to ensure optimal outcomes for women and their infants. Despite the complexity and risks, a gap exists in the comprehensive guidelines and recommendations for managing anorexia nervosa in pregnancy. This Review provides multidisciplinary recommendations for clinical care in this area. Managing anorexia nervosa in pregnancy is an area of clinical care that requires a multidisciplinary approach and includes those experienced in managing high-risk pregnancies.

Psychotropic drug utilization patterns in pregnant women with bipolar disorder: A 16-year population-based cohort study

Despite growing concern about reproductive safety of psychotropic drugs, there is a paucity of research assessing prenatal prescribing practices for bipolar disorder (BD). This population-based cohort study identified women aged 15-50 years with BD diagnosis, who delivered their first and singleton child between 2003 and 2018 in Hong Kong, with an aim to examine temporal trends and predictors of prenatal psychotropic drug use as well as drug utilization patterns before and during pregnancy were evaluated. Data were retrieved from territory-wide medical-record database of public healthcare services. Of 302 identified women, 202 (66.9%) and 180 (59.6%) redeemed at least 1 prescription for psychotropic drugs in 12 months pre-pregnancy and during pregnancy, respectively. Psychotropic drug treatment (OR = 16.14 [95% CI: 8.79-29.65]) and psychiatric admission (OR = 4.12 [95% CI: 1.66-10.24]) within 12 months pre-pregnancy were associated with prenatal drug use. Second-generation antipsychotic use during pregnancy increased over time, while prenatal use of lithium, anti-epileptics and first-generation-antipsychotics showed declining trend. Use of psychotropic drugs progressively decreased across pre-pregnancy and trimesters of pregnancy. Forty-two (23.3%) women received polypharmacy during pregnancy. Antidepressant use accounted for 17% of all monotherapy episodes. A significant proportion of women exposed to valproate in 12 months pre-pregnancy (27.2%) and first-trimester (16%). In conclusion, our results generally indicate trajectories of reduced psychotropic drug use across pregnancy. Deviations between real-world prescribing patterns and treatment guidelines underscore the need for comprehensive review of current clinical practices. Further research clarifying relationships of prenatal psychotropic drug exposure with maternal and fetal outcomes is warranted.

Severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) in pregnancy and breastfeeding: focus on second-generation long acting injectable antipsychotics

Introduction: Pregnant women and fetuses are more likely than ever to be exposed to antipsychotic drugs (APs) during pregnancy and postpartum period. Second-generation APs (SGA) are increasingly used among women in reproductive age. Key outcomes (i.e., congenital malformations, pregnancy and maternal outcomes, neonatal/infant risks, and developmental/long-term outcomes) following the exposure to APs remain limited in number and size and yield of inconsistent findings overall, particularly regarding long-acting injectable AP (LAI-APs) formulations.Areas covered: The review aims at providing a summary of current knowledge on potential risks and safety profile of LAI-APs during pregnancy and breastfeeding, specifically focusing on SGA.Expert opinion: The management of safety and tolerability of long-acting injectable AP (LAI-APs) is far from having solid scientific evidence. In fact, due to ethical reasons, there is a lack of randomized clinical trials that limits the reliability and generalizability of the available data on LAI-APs safety profile during the perinatal period, being limited in the scientific literature only to isolated case reports. Therefore, it seems to be important for the future pathways to perinatal mental health care, providing a network of specialized clinicians and systematically collecting data of pregnant/puerperal women on oral and/or LAI APs-therapy about mother and infant outcomes.

Pre-existingmental health disorders affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospectivecohort study

BACKGROUND

This was a hospital registry-based retrospective age-matched cohort study that aimed to compare pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of women with pre-existing mental disorders with those of mentally healthy women.

METHODS

A matched cohort retrospective study was carried out in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, a tertiary health care institution. Medical records of pregnant women who gave birth from 2006 to 2015 were used. The study group was comprised of 131 pregnant women with mental disorders matched to 228 mentally healthy controls. The primary outcomes assessed were antenatal care characteristics; secondary outcomes were neonatal complications.

RESULTS

Pregnant women with pre-existing mental health disorders were significantly more likely to have low education, be unmarried and unemployed, have a disability that led to lower working capacity, smoke more frequently, have chronic concomitant diseases, attend fewer antenatal visits, gain less weight, be hospitalized during pregnancy, spend more time in hospital during the postpartum period, and were less likely to breastfeed their newborns. The newborns of women with pre-existing mental disorders were small for gestational age (SGA) more often than those of healthy controls (12.9% vs. 7.6%, p < 0.05). No difference was found comparing the methods of delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with pre-existing mental health disorders had a worse course of pregnancy. Mental illness increased the risk to deliver a SGA newborn (RR 2.055, 95% CI 1.081-3.908).

Outcomes of drug exposition during pregnancy: Analysis from a teratology information service

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to characterize drug exposures during pregnancy where the outcome was known that had benefited from counselling through our Teratology Information Service (TIS) between 1994-2016.

STUDY DESIGN

This observational study analysed data collected through the drug exposures during pregnancy counselling. Data was analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Data from a total of 1'374 pregnant women were collected. Mean age was of 32 years. These women were exposed to more than ten drugs in 1.4 % (N = 19) of cases, with a mean drug intake of two. Analysis of the drugs altogether (N = 3'129) showed that FDA Pregnancy Category C drugs represented 42.9 % (N = 1'342) of drugs and ATC code N (nervous system) represented 36.4 % (N = 1'138). The onset of drug exposure was during the first trimester of pregnancy in 95.1 % (N = 2'982) of patients. Regarding outcomes, the rate of induced abortion was 10.8 % (N = 151), of pregnancy complications was 11.2 % (N = 157) and of malformations was 4.5 % (N = 49).

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women counselled by our TIS take a mean of two drugs, ranging from one to 17. Drugs are from FDA Pregnancy Category C and ATC N drugs in most cases, 42.9 % and 36.4 % respectively. The rate of malformation of our cohort was of 4.5 %, close to the estimated spontaneous rate of malformation. This data gives a reassuring aspect of drug exposure in pregnancy but takes into account the outcome at birth only.

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: Updated recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

These updated guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology replace the original version published in 2011. They address the scope and targets of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. A consensus meeting was held in 2017, involving experts in schizophrenia and its treatment. They were asked to review key areas and consider the strength of the evidence on the risk-benefit balance of pharmacological interventions and the clinical implications, with an emphasis on meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials where available, plus updates on current clinical practice. The guidelines cover the pharmacological management and treatment of schizophrenia across the various stages of the illness, including first-episode, relapse prevention, and illness that has proved refractory to standard treatment. It is hoped that the practice recommendations presented will support clinical decision making for practitioners, serve as a source of information for patients and carers, and inform quality improvement.