Can the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotic preparations be increased in routine clinical practice and the benefits realised?

BACKGROUND

The use of continuing antipsychotic medication is an established evidence-based strategy for preventing relapse in people with schizophrenia, but medication adherence is known to be suboptimal. Covert non-adherence can be eliminated by the use of long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations. We sought to (1) raise awareness among clinicians of the potential benefits of LAI antipsychotic formulations, (2) increase use of these formulations for the treatment of schizophrenia in routine clinical practice and thereby (3) reduce the number of relapses requiring hospitalisation in patients with schizophrenia under our care.

METHOD

Educational initiatives, promotion of reflective practice and patient-specific reminders were used to prompt increased use of LAI antipsychotic medication for patients with schizophrenia. Data relating to the use of these medications and the number of acute admissions for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (F20-29, ICD-10) over time were extracted from existing clinical information systems.

RESULTS

Over the 3-year time frame of our local initiative, the use of LAI antipsychotic preparations increased by 11%, the number of acute admissions for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (F20 and F25) decreased by 26% and the number of acute bed days occupied by patients with these diagnoses decreased by 8%. The number of admissions for other psychosis diagnoses (F21-24 and F28-29) did not show the same pattern of improvement.

CONCLUSION

In our health care organisation, raising clinicians' awareness of the evidence base relating to the potentially favourable benefit-risk balance for LAI antipsychotic medication compared with oral formulations resulted in more use of the former. There were accompanying reductions in acute admissions and occupied bed days for patients with schizophrenia.

Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Antipsychotic Drugs for Acute Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

The dose-response relationships of antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia are not well defined, but such information would be important for decision making by clinicians. The authors sought to fill this gap by conducting dose-response meta-analyses.

METHODS

A search of multiple electronic databases (through November 2018) was conducted for all placebo-controlled dose-finding studies for 20 second-generation antipsychotic drugs and haloperidol (oral and long-acting injectable, LAI) in people with acute schizophrenia symptoms. Dose-response curves were constructed with random-effects dose-response meta-analyses and a spline model. The outcome measure was total score reduction from baseline on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale or the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The authors identified 95% effective doses, explored whether higher or lower doses than the currently licensed ones might be more appropriate, and derived dose equivalencies from the 95% effective doses.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The 95% effective doses and the doses equivalent to 1 mg of oral risperidone, respectively, were as follows: amisulpride for patients with positive symptoms, 537 mg/day and 85.8 mg; aripiprazole, 11.5 mg/day and 1.8 mg; aripiprazole LAI (lauroxil), 463 mg every 4 weeks and 264 mg; asenapine, 15.0 mg/day and 2.4 mg; brexpiprazole, 3.36 mg/day and 0.54 mg; haloperidol, 6.3 mg/day and 1.01 mg; iloperidone, 20.13 mg/day and 3.2 mg; lurasidone, 147 mg/day and 23.5 mg; olanzapine, 15.2 mg/day and 2.4 mg; olanzapine LAI, 277 mg every 2 weeks and 3.2 mg; paliperidone, 13.4 mg/day and 2.1 mg; paliperidone LAI, 120 mg every 4 weeks and 1.53 mg; quetiapine, 482 mg/day and 77 mg; risperidone, 6.3 mg/day and 1 mg; risperidone LAI, 36.6 mg every 2 weeks and 0.42 mg; sertindole, 22.5 mg/day and 3.6 mg; and ziprasidone, 186 mg/day and 30 mg. For amisulpride and olanzapine, specific data for patients with predominant negative symptoms were available. The authors have made available on their web site a spreadsheet with this method and other updated methods that can be used to estimate dose equivalencies in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic schizophrenia patients with acute exacerbations, doses higher than the identified 95% effective doses may on average not provide more efficacy. For some drugs, higher than currently licensed doses might be tested in further trials, because their dose-response curves did not plateau.

Attitudes of European physicians towards the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

Prescription rates for long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic formulations remain relatively low in Europe despite improved adherence over alternative oral antipsychotic treatments. This apparent under-prescription of LAI antipsychotics may have multiple contributing factors, including negative mental health practitioner attitudes towards the use of LAIs.

METHODS

The Antipsychotic Long acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) non-interventional study (NIS), conducted across several European countries, utilised a questionnaire that was specifically designed to address physicians' attitudes and beliefs towards the treatment of schizophrenia with LAI antipsychotics. Exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) of feedback from the questionnaire aimed to identify and characterize the factors that best explained the physicians' attitudes towards prescription of LAIs.

RESULTS

Overall, 136/234 solicited physicians returned fully completed questionnaires. Physicians' mean age was 48.5 years, with mean psychiatric experience of 20.0 years; 69.9% were male, 84.6% held a consultant position, and 91.9% had a clinical specialty in general adult care. Most physicians considered themselves to have a high level of clinical experience with LAI antipsychotics (77.2%), with an increased rate of LAI antipsychotics prescription over the last 5 years (59.6%). Although the majority of physicians (69.9%) declared feeling no difference in stress levels when offering LAI compared to oral antipsychotics, feelings of 'no/more stress' versus 'less stress' was found to influence prescription patterns. PCA identified six factors which collectively explained 66.1% of the variance in physician feedback. Multivariate analysis identified a positive correlation between physicians willing to accept usage of LAI antipsychotics and the positive attitude of colleagues (co-efficient 3.67; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The physician questionnaire in the ALTO study is the first to evaluate the attitudes around LAI antipsychotics across several European countries, on a larger scale. Findings from this study offer an important insight into how physician attitudes can influence the acceptance and usage of LAI antipsychotics to treat patients with schizophrenia.

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: Updated recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

These updated guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology replace the original version published in 2011. They address the scope and targets of pharmacological treatment for schizophrenia. A consensus meeting was held in 2017, involving experts in schizophrenia and its treatment. They were asked to review key areas and consider the strength of the evidence on the risk-benefit balance of pharmacological interventions and the clinical implications, with an emphasis on meta-analyses, systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials where available, plus updates on current clinical practice. The guidelines cover the pharmacological management and treatment of schizophrenia across the various stages of the illness, including first-episode, relapse prevention, and illness that has proved refractory to standard treatment. It is hoped that the practice recommendations presented will support clinical decision making for practitioners, serve as a source of information for patients and carers, and inform quality improvement.

Joint BAP NAPICU evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical management of acute disturbance: De-escalation and rapid tranquillisation

The British Association for Psychopharmacology and the National Association of Psychiatric Intensive Care and Low Secure Units developed this joint evidence-based consensus guideline for the clinical management of acute disturbance. It includes recommendations for clinical practice and an algorithm to guide treatment by healthcare professionals with various options outlined according to their route of administration and category of evidence. Fundamental overarching principles are included and highlight the importance of treating the underlying disorder. There is a focus on three key interventions: de-escalation, pharmacological interventions pre-rapid tranquillisation and rapid tranquillisation (intramuscular and intravenous). Most of the evidence reviewed relates to emergency psychiatric care or acute psychiatric adult inpatient care, although we also sought evidence relevant to other common clinical settings including the general acute hospital and forensic psychiatry. We conclude that the variety of options available for the management of acute disturbance goes beyond the standard choices of lorazepam, haloperidol and promethazine and includes oral-inhaled loxapine, buccal midazolam, as well as a number of oral antipsychotics in addition to parenteral options of intramuscular aripiprazole, intramuscular droperidol and intramuscular olanzapine. Intravenous options, for settings where resuscitation equipment and trained staff are available to manage medical emergencies, are also included.

Baseline results from the European non-interventional Antipsychotic Long acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) study

BACKGROUND

The Antipsychotic Long-acTing injection in schizOphrenia (ALTO) study was a non-interventional study across several European countries examining prescription of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics to identify sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients receiving and physicians prescribing LAIs. ALTO was also the first large-scale study in Europe to report on the use of both first- or second-generation antipsychotic (FGA- or SGA-) LAIs.

METHODS

Patients with schizophrenia receiving a FGA- or SGA-LAI were enrolled between June 2013 and July 2014 and categorized as incident or prevalent users. Assessments included measures of disease severity, functioning, insight, well-being, attitudes towards antipsychotics, and quality of life.

RESULTS

For the 572 patients, disease severity was generally mild-to-moderate and the majority were unemployed and/or socially withdrawn. 331/572 were prevalent LAI antipsychotic users; of whom 209 were prescribed FGA-LAI. Paliperidone was the most commonly prescribed SGA-LAI (56% of incident users, 21% of prevalent users). 337/572 (58.9%) were considered at risk of non-adherence. Prevalent LAI users had a tendency towards better insight levels (PANSS G12 item). Incident FGA-LAI users had more severe disease, poorer global functioning, lower quality of life, higher rates of non-adherence, and were more likely to have physician-reported lack of insight.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate a lower pattern of FGA-LAI usage, reserved by prescribers for seemingly more difficult-to-treat patients and those least likely to adhere to oral medication.

Challenges in recruitment of research participants

There are many potential pitfalls in the identification and enlistment of suitable candidates for psychiatric research. The challenges of recruitment are highlighted, detailing impact of study design, characteristics of participants, including demographics and personal preferences, investigator characteristics and collaboration with clinicians. Techniques used in recruitment are discussed, including financial incentives, assertive tracking and communication methods. Ethical issues, methods of data collection, and control participants are also considered. Key issues are: early consideration of the impact of study design on the recruitment process; the participant's perspective; close collaboration with colleagues; the investigator's good interpersonal, communication and organisational skills; and feedback to collaborators, associated clinicians and participants.

Why aren't depot antipsychotics prescribed more often and what can be done about it?

Long-acting depot antipsychotics were developed specifically to promote treatment adherence (compliance) and they are a valuable option for patients requiring maintenance medication for schizophrenia. Depot use has fallen in recent years, perhaps owing to the introduction of oral atypical antipsychotics. Psychiatrist and patient acceptance of depot medication is variable. The depot formulation and the traditional ‘depot clinic’ seem to have an image problem, although many patients already receiving depot medication like it. Some psychiatrists may not adequately consider the risks and benefits when contemplating prescribing depot medication. Further, public opinion and planning forces in psychiatric health services may have a negative influence on the use of long-acting treatments. This review considers possible reasons for underutilisation of depot antipsychotics in maintenance treatment of schizophrenia and highlights the potential benefits and future role of depot drugs.

Antipsychotic treatment resistance in first-episode psychosis: prevalence, subtypes and predictors

BACKGROUND

We examined longitudinally the course and predictors of treatment resistance in a large cohort of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients from initiation of antipsychotic treatment. We hypothesized that antipsychotic treatment resistance is: (a) present at illness onset; and (b) differentially associated with clinical and demographic factors.

METHOD

The study sample comprised 323 FEP patients who were studied at first contact and at 10-year follow-up. We collated clinical information on severity of symptoms, antipsychotic medication and treatment adherence during the follow-up period to determine the presence, course and predictors of treatment resistance.

RESULTS

From the 23% of the patients, who were treatment resistant, 84% were treatment resistant from illness onset. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that diagnosis of schizophrenia, negative symptoms, younger age at onset, and longer duration of untreated psychosis predicted treatment resistance from illness onset.

CONCLUSIONS

The striking majority of treatment-resistant patients do not respond to first-line antipsychotic treatment even at time of FEP. Clinicians must be alert to this subgroup of patients and consider clozapine treatment as early as possible during the first presentation of psychosis.

BAP guidelines on the management of weight gain, metabolic disturbances and cardiovascular risk associated with psychosis and antipsychotic drug treatment

Excess deaths from cardiovascular disease are a major contributor to the significant reduction in life expectancy experienced by people with schizophrenia. Important risk factors in this are smoking, alcohol misuse, excessive weight gain and diabetes. Weight gain also reinforces service users' negative views of themselves and is a factor in poor adherence with treatment. Monitoring of relevant physical health risk factors is frequently inadequate, as is provision of interventions to modify these. These guidelines review issues surrounding monitoring of physical health risk factors and make recommendations about an appropriate approach. Overweight and obesity, partly driven by antipsychotic drug treatment, are important factors contributing to the development of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in people with schizophrenia. There have been clinical trials of many interventions for people experiencing weight gain when taking antipsychotic medications but there is a lack of clear consensus regarding which may be appropriate in usual clinical practice. These guidelines review these trials and make recommendations regarding appropriate interventions. Interventions for smoking and alcohol misuse are reviewed, but more briefly as these are similar to those recommended for the general population. The management of impaired fasting glycaemia and impaired glucose tolerance ('pre-diabetes'), diabetes and other cardiovascular risks, such as dyslipidaemia, are also reviewed with respect to other currently available guidelines.These guidelines were compiled following a consensus meeting of experts involved in various aspects of these problems. They reviewed key areas of evidence and their clinical implications. Wider issues relating to primary care/secondary care interfaces are discussed but cannot be resolved within guidelines such as these.

Antipsychotic-related fatal poisoning, England and Wales, 1993-2013: impact of the withdrawal of thioridazine

CONTEXT

Use of second generation antipsychotics in England and Wales has increased in recent years whilst prescription of first generation antipsychotics has decreased.

METHODS

To evaluate the impact of this change and of the withdrawal of thioridazine in 2000 on antipsychotic-related fatal poisoning, we reviewed all such deaths in England and Wales 1993-2013 recorded on the Office for National Statistics drug poisoning deaths database. We also reviewed antipsychotic prescribing in the community, England and Wales, 2001-2013. Use of routine mortality data: When an antipsychotic was recorded with other drug(s), the death certificate does not normally say if the antipsychotic caused the death rather than the other substance(s). A second consideration concerns intent. A record of "undetermined intent" is likely to have been intentional self-poisoning, the evidence being insufficient to be certain that the individual intended to kill. A record of drug abuse/dependence, on the other hand, is likely to have been associated with an unintentional death. Accuracy of the diagnosis of poisoning: When investigating a death in someone prescribed antipsychotics, toxicological analysis of biological samples collected post-mortem is usually performed. However, prolonged attempts at resuscitation, or diffusion from tissues into blood as autolysis proceeds, may serve to alter the composition of blood sampled after death from that circulating at death. With chlorpromazine and with olanzapine a further factor is that these compounds are notoriously unstable in post-mortem blood. Deaths from antipsychotics: There were 1544 antipsychotic-related poisoning deaths. Deaths in males (N = 948) were almost twice those in females. For most antipsychotics, the proportion of deaths in which a specific antipsychotic featured either alone, or only with alcohol was 30-40%, but for clozapine (193 deaths) such mentions totalled 66%. For clozapine, the proportion of deaths attributed to either intentional self-harm, or undetermined intent was 44%, but for all other drugs except haloperidol (20 deaths) the proportion was 56% or more. The annual number of antipsychotic-related deaths increased from some 55 per year (1.0 per million population) between 1993 and 1998 to 74 (1.5 per million population) in 2000, and then after falling slightly in 2002 increased steadily to reach 109 (1.9 per million population) in 2013. Intent: The annual number of intentional and unascertained intent poisoning deaths remained relatively constant throughout the study period (1993: 35 deaths, 2013: 38 deaths) hence the increase in antipsychotic-related deaths since 2002 was almost entirely in unintentional poisoning involving second generation antipsychotics. Clozapine, olanzapine, and quetiapine were the second generation antipsychotics mentioned most frequently in unintentional poisonings (99, 136, and 99 deaths, respectively). Mentions of diamorphine/morphine and methadone (67 and 99 deaths, respectively) together with an antipsychotic were mainly (84 and 90%, respectively) in either unintentional or drug abuse-related deaths. Deaths and community prescriptions: Deaths involving antipsychotics (10 or more deaths) were in the range 11.3-17.1 deaths per million community prescriptions in England and Wales, 2001-2013. Almost all (96%) such deaths now involve second generation antipsychotics. This is keeping with the increase in annual numbers of prescriptions of these drugs overall (<1 million in 2000, 7 million in 2013), largely driven by increases in prescriptions for olanzapine and quetiapine. In contrast, deaths involving thioridazine declined markedly (from 40 in 2000 to 10 in 2003-2013) in line with the fall in prescriptions for thioridazine from 2001.

CONCLUSIONS

The removal of thioridazine has had no apparent effect on the incidence of antipsychotic-related fatal poisoning in England and Wales. That such deaths have increased steadily since 2001 is in large part attributable to an increase in unintentional deaths related to (i) clozapine, and (ii) co-exposure to opioids, principally diamorphine and methadone.

Dose Equivalents for Second-Generation Antipsychotic Drugs: The Classical Mean Dose Method

BACKGROUND

The concept of dose equivalence is important for many purposes. The classical approach published by Davis in 1974 subsequently dominated textbooks for several decades. It was based on the assumption that the mean doses found in flexible-dose trials reflect the average optimum dose which can be used for the calculation of dose equivalence. We are the first to apply the method to second-generation antipsychotics.

METHODS

We searched for randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose trials in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia that examined 13 oral second-generation antipsychotics, haloperidol, and chlorpromazine (last search June 2014). We calculated the mean doses of each drug weighted by sample size and divided them by the weighted mean olanzapine dose to obtain olanzapine equivalents.

RESULTS

We included 75 studies with 16 555 participants. The doses equivalent to 1 mg/d olanzapine were: amisulpride 38.3 mg/d, aripiprazole 1.4 mg/d, asenapine 0.9 mg/d, chlorpromazine 38.9 mg/d, clozapine 30.6 mg/d, haloperidol 0.7 mg/d, quetiapine 32.3mg/d, risperidone 0.4 mg/d, sertindole 1.1 mg/d, ziprasidone 7.9 mg/d, zotepine 13.2 mg/d. For iloperidone, lurasidone, and paliperidone no data were available.

CONCLUSIONS

The classical mean dose method is not reliant on the limited availability of fixed-dose data at the lower end of the effective dose range, which is the major limitation of "minimum effective dose methods" and "dose-response curve methods." In contrast, the mean doses found by the current approach may have in part depended on the dose ranges chosen for the original trials. Ultimate conclusions on dose equivalence of antipsychotics will need to be based on a review of various methods.

Antipsychotic therapeutic drug monitoring: psychiatrists' attitudes and factors predicting likely future use

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore predictive factors for future use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and to further examine psychiatrists' current prescribing practices and perspectives regarding antipsychotic TDM using plasma concentrations.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study for consultant psychiatrists using a postal questionnaire was conducted in north-west England. Data were combined with those of a previous London-based study and principal axis factor analysis was conducted to identify predictors of future use of TDM.

RESULTS

Most of the 181 participants (82.9%, 95% confidence interval 76.7-87.7%) agreed that 'if TDM for antipsychotics were readily available, I would use it'. Factor analysis identified five factors from the original 35 items regarding TDM. Four of the factors significantly predicted likely future use of antipsychotic TDM and together explained 40% of the variance in a multivariate linear regression model. Likely future use increased with positive attitudes and expectations, and decreased with potential barriers, negative attitudes and negative expectations. Scientific perspectives of TDM and psychiatrist characteristics were not significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

Most senior psychiatrists indicated that they would use antipsychotic TDM if available. However, psychiatrists' attitudes and expectations and the potential barriers need to be addressed, in addition to the scientific evidence, before widespread use of antipsychotic TDM is likely in clinical practice.

Olanzapine and risperidone plasma concentration therapeutic drug monitoring: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develop a clinically acceptable method of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for olanzapine and risperidone and to evaluate the feasibility of its implementation.

METHOD

A non-randomised study of inpatients from five Mental Health Trusts was conducted, with a clinical interview at the time of TDM and a subsequent 6-week follow-up review of clinical notes. The TDM intervention comprised: (a) a venous blood sample taken 12 hours post-dose, 7-10 days after drug initiation, and (b) rapid results feedback, with interpretation algorithm guidance.

RESULTS

Thirty-two participants provided samples (19 prescribed olanzapine, 13 risperidone). Twenty-six participants remained on the target drug at study end, with seven experiencing a dose change, for whom only four of the TDM results were confirmed as having been checked. Mean dose increased for olanzapine (0.9 mg/day, range 0-10) and decreased for risperidone (-0.3 mg/day, range -4-3).

CONCLUSION

TDM can be implemented as part of routine clinical practice for both drugs. However, the lack of robust supporting evidence for or against antipsychotic TDM has probably led to a lack of enthusiasm for and interest in the results. Nevertheless, the advent of less invasive measures and the targeting of patients who might be more likely to benefit may facilitate uptake.

The use of psychotropic medication in patients with emotionally unstable personality disorder under the care of UK mental health services

BACKGROUND

Guideline recommendations for the pharmacologic treatment of personality disorder lack consensus, particularly for emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD), and there is limited information on current prescribing practice in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the nature and quality of current prescribing practice for personality disorder across the United Kingdom, as part of a quality improvement program.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey of self-selected psychiatric services providing care for adults with personality disorder (ICD-10 criteria) was conducted. Data were collected during May 2012.

RESULTS

Of 2,600 patients with a diagnosis of personality disorder, more than two-thirds (68%) had a diagnosis of EUPD. Almost all (92%) patients in the EUPD subgroup were prescribed psychotropic medication, most commonly an antidepressant or antipsychotic, principally for symptoms and behaviors that characterize EUPD, particularly affective dysregulation. Prescribing patterns were similar between those who had a diagnosed comorbid mental illness and those who had EUPD alone, but the latter group was less likely to have had their medication reviewed over the previous year, particularly with respect to tolerability (53% vs 43%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of psychotropic medication in EUPD in the United Kingdom is largely outside the licensed indications. Whether the treatment target is identified as intrinsic symptoms of EUPD or comorbid mental illness may depend on the diagnostic threshold of individual clinicians. Compared with prescribing for EUPD where there is judged to be a comorbid mental illness, the use of off-label medication for EUPD alone is less systematically reviewed and monitored, so opportunities for learning may be lost. Treatment may be continued long term by default.

Re-examining the role of benzodiazepines in the treatment of schizophrenia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine prescribing for schizophrenia occurs in clinical practice and antipsychotic trials. This review examined the clinical outcomes for benzodiazepines in schizophrenia.

METHOD

A systematic search identified randomised controlled trials that evaluated benzodiazepines in comparison with placebo or antipsychotics, and also as adjuncts to antipsychotics. Relevant clinical outcome data was extracted.

RESULTS

Twenty six studies were included with some reporting multiple comparisons. Seven short-term studies compared benzodiazepines with placebo: benzodiazepine superiority was found in two out of five studies for global improvements and two out of four studies for psychiatric/behavioural outcomes. Eleven studies compared benzodiazepines with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs): four out of nine studies (including two long-term studies) reported greater global improvements for antipsychotics; four out of five studies showed no treatment differences for psychiatric/behavioural outcomes. Fourteen studies compared benzodiazepines (as adjunct to antipsychotics) vs antipsychotics alone (mostly FGAs); benzodiazepine superiority was found for global improvement in one out of eight studies and inferiority in two out of eight short-term studies whereas superiority was found for psychiatric/behavioural outcomes in three out of 12 short-term studies and inferiority in three out of 12 studies.

CONCLUSION

Benzodiazepine superiority over placebo was found for global, psychiatric and behavioural outcomes, but inferiority to antipsychotics on longer-term global outcomes. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the addition of benzodiazepines to antipsychotics; thus the use of benzodiazepines in clinical practice and antipsychotic trials should be limited.

The quality of reporting of phase II and III trials for new antipsychotics: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The findings of the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study and the Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS) called previous trials of antipsychotics into question, including pre-licensing trials. Concerns regarding methodological robustness and quality of reporting increased. This systematic review aimed to examine the quality of reporting of phase II and III trials for new antipsychotics in the aftermath of the CATIE and CUtLASS studies.

METHOD

Electronic searches were conducted in EMBASE, Medline and Cochrane databases and also ClinicalTrials.gov for antipsychotic trials (published between January 2006 and February 2012). Phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for iloperidone, asenapine, paliperidone, olanzapine, lurasidone and pomaglumetad methionil were selected for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. The reporting of the methodology was evaluated in accordance with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-one articles regarding 32 studies were included. There was insufficient reporting of design in 47% of studies and only 13% explicitly stated a primary hypothesis. Exclusion criteria were poorly reported for diagnosis in 22% of studies. Detail regarding comparators, particularly placebos, was suboptimal for 56% of studies, and permitted concomitant medication was often not reported (19%). Randomization methods were poorly described in 56% of studies and reporting on blinding was insufficient in 84% of studies. Sample size calculations were insufficiently reported in 59% of studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of reporting of phase II and III trials for new antipsychotics does not reach the standards outlined in the CONSORT guidelines. Authors often fail to adequately report design and methodological processes, potentially impeding the progress of research on antipsychotic efficacy. Both policymakers and clinicians require high quality reporting before decisions are made regarding licensing and prescribing of new antipsychotics.

Assessment and treatment of physical health problems among people with schizophrenia: national cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

In the UK and other high-income countries, life expectancy in people with schizophrenia is 20% lower than in the general population.

AIMS

To examine the quality of assessment and treatment of physical health problems in people with schizophrenia. Method Retrospective audit of records of people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder aged ⩾18. We collected data on nine key aspects of physical health for 5091 patients and combined these with a cross-sectional patient survey.

RESULTS

Body mass index was recorded in 2599 (51.1%) patients during the previous 12 months and 1102 (21.6%) had evidence of assessment of all nine key measures. Among those with high blood sugar, there was recorded evidence of 53.5% receiving an appropriate intervention. Among those with dyslipidaemia, this was 19.9%. Despite this, most patients reported that they were satisfied with the physical healthcare they received.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment and treatment of common physical health problems in people with schizophrenia falls well below acceptable standards. Cooperation and communication between primary and secondary care services needs to improve if premature mortality in this group is to be reduced.

Quality of prescribing for schizophrenia: evidence from a national audit in England and Wales

The National Audit of Schizophrenia (NAS) examined the quality of care received in England and Wales. Part of the audit set out to determine whether six prescribing standards, set by the national clinical guidelines for schizophrenia, were being implemented and to prompt improvements in care. Mental Health Trusts and Health Boards provided data obtained from case-notes for adult patients living in the community with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. An audit of practice tool was developed for data collection. Most of the 5055 patients reviewed were receiving pharmacological treatment according to national guidelines. However, 15.9% of the total sample (95%CI: 14.9-16.9) were prescribed two or more antipsychotics concurrently and 10.1% of patients (95%CI: 9.3-10.9) were prescribed medication in excess of recommended limits. Overall 23.7% (95%CI: 22.5-24.8) of patients were receiving clozapine. However, there were many with treatment resistance who had no clear reason documented as to why they had not had a trial of clozapine (430/1073, 40.1%). In conclusion, whilst most people were prescribed medication in accordance with nationally agreed standards, there was considerable variation between service providers. Antipsychotic polypharmacy, high dose prescribing and clozapine underutilisation in treatment resistance were all key concerns which need to be further addressed.

Dose equivalents for second-generation antipsychotics: the minimum effective dose method

BACKGROUND

Clinicians need to know the right antipsychotic dose for optimized treatment, and the concept of dose equivalence is important for many clinical and scientific purposes.

METHODS

We refined a method presented in 2003, which was based on the minimum effective doses found in fixed-dose studies. We operationalized the selection process, updated the original findings, and expanded them by systematically searching more recent literature and by including 13 second-generation antipsychotics. To qualify for the minimum effective dose, a dose had to be significantly more efficacious than placebo in the primary outcome of at least one randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose trial. In a sensitivity analysis, 2 positive trials were required. The minimum effective doses identified were subsequently used to derive olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, and chlorpromazine equivalents.

RESULTS

We reviewed 73 included studies. The minimum effective daily doses/olanzapine equivalents based on our primary approach were: aripiprazole 10 mg/1.33, asenapine 10 mg/1.33, clozapine 300 mg/40, haloperidol 4 mg/0.53, iloperidone 8 mg/1.07, lurasidone 40 mg/5.33, olanzapine 7.5 mg/1, paliperidone 3 mg/0.4, quetiapine 150 mg/20, risperidone 2 mg/0.27, sertindole 12 mg/1.60, and ziprasidone 40 mg/5.33. For amisulpride and zotepine, reliable estimates could not be derived.

CONCLUSIONS

This method for determining antipsychotic dose equivalence entails an operationalized and evidence-based approach that can be applied to the various antipsychotic drugs. As a limitation, the results are not applicable to specific populations such as first-episode or refractory patients. We recommend that alternative methods also be updated in order to minimize further differences between the methods and risk of subsequent bias.

How to compare doses of different antipsychotics: a systematic review of methods

BACKGROUND

The ability to calculate equivalent dosage is important when comparing or switching between doses of different antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia. It is also necessary when designing antipsychotic comparator trials which control for dosage.

METHOD

A systematic review to identify and critically evaluate the methods available for the estimation of antipsychotic dose equivalence was conducted. Electronic searches were carried out using Medline and PubMed and additional information was requested from pharmaceutical companies. The identified methods were evaluated against specific criteria regarding scientific rigour, quality of source data underpinning the method, clinical applicability and utility.

RESULTS

Eleven articles were identified that described methodologies for antipsychotic dose equivalence. Seven of these referred to calculated methods, including chlorpromazine equivalence, maximum dose and daily-defined dose, and relied on an evidence base from both fixed and flexible dosing data. The remaining four described consensus methods which were based on the knowledge and experience of experts. Chlorpromazine was used as the standard comparator drug in the majority of the calculated equivalence studies, whereas risperidone was used for most consensus methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of methods for calculating antipsychotic dose equivalence suggests that different methods yield different equivalencies and the evidence is not sufficiently robust for any of these to be considered as a gold standard method. Thus, choice of method may introduce bias, either an over or underestimate of equivalent dosage, when designing head-to-head, antipsychotic, fixed-dose trials. Consequently, clinical trial reports should routinely include justification of the choice of method for calculating dose equivalence.

Naturalistic outcomes of community treatment orders: antipsychotic long-acting injections versus oral medication

BACKGROUND

Community treatment orders (CTOs) are initiated to compel the patient in the community to take part in a management plan, of which medication is often a part. CTOs were introduced in 2008, in England and Wales. We evaluated naturalistic outcomes of CTOs, according to the antipsychotic formulation prescribed at CTO initiation.

METHODS

A cohort study with prospective consecutive sampling and 1-year follow-up was conducted in a large mental health trust in South London. Measures included: demographics, psychotropics and CTO outcomes. Comparison groups were long-acting injection (LAI) versus oral formulations only, for the primary outcomes of time to CTO cessation in days and time to first hospital admission in days, whilst the CTO remained active.

RESULTS

For the 188 included patients, the CTO ceased within 1 year, either due to revocation (22.3%), discharge (28.1%) or lapse (19.7%). The CTO was renewed at 6 months for 92 (48.9%) patients, and then 56 (29.8%) were renewed again at 12 months. The antipsychotic formulation at CTO initiation was more likely to be LAI (60.6%) than oral (39.4%). Time to CTO cessation was longer for LAI than oral (median 251 versus 182 days, p = 0.030). A total of 54 patients experienced at least one admission; there was no difference between groups by drug formulation (oral 28.4% versus LAI 28.9%, p = 0.933). The mean time to first admission was 147.1 days and did not differ by formulation.

CONCLUSIONS

CTO duration was longer for those prescribed an antipsychotic LAI at CTO initiation, although the time to first admission and number of admissions did not differ between groups. CTOs not only compel treatment, but bind services to the patient, resulting in more intensive follow up. Whether enhanced treatment, via oral or LAI and enabled by the CTO, translates into improved clinical outcomes is yet to be determined.

Plasma quetiapine in relation to prescribed dose and other factors: data from a therapeutic drug monitoring service, 2000-2011

OBJECTIVE

Suggested predose plasma quetiapine target ranges for effective therapy in schizophrenia lie between 50 and 500 µg/l. We aimed to examine data from a quetiapine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service to assess the plasma quetiapine concentrations attained at specified doses in clinical practice.

METHOD

We studied TDM data from patients given immediate-release quetiapine in the period 2000-2011.

RESULTS

There were 946 samples from 487 patients (257 males, age at time of first sample, median [range] 34 [14-87] years, and 230 females, age at time of first sample, median [range] 38 [10-92] years). The plasma quetiapine concentration was <50 and <100 µg/l in 30% and 50% of samples, respectively (no quetiapine detected in 9% of samples). The relationship between dose and plasma quetiapine was poor. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) quetiapine dose was higher (t = 3.6, df = 446, p <0.01) in males versus females (641 [600-1240] and 548 [600-943] mg/day, respectively), although there was no difference in median dose (600 mg/day) or in the mean (95% CI) plasma quetiapine concentrations attained. Smoking habit had no discernible effect on plasma quetiapine concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a poor relationship between dose and plasma quetiapine concentration in this study, as found by others. This is probably because of the short plasma half-life of the drug, at least in part. Nevertheless, quetiapine TDM can help assess adherence and measurement of quetiapine metabolites, notably N-desalkylquetiapine, as well as quetiapine itself may enhance the value of quetiapine TDM in future.

Plasma clozapine and norclozapine in relation to prescribed dose and other factors in patients aged <18 years: data from a therapeutic drug monitoring service, 1994-2010

AIM

Clozapine is used in children and adolescents to treat early onset schizophrenia, but data on efficacy and on the plasma clozapine concentrations attained are limited.

METHODS

We studied data from a clozapine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) service, patients in the UK and Eire aged <18 years, 1994-2010. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between plasma clozapine concentration and dose, age, sex, body weight, plasma clozapine:norclozapine ratio (clozapine metabolic ratio (MR)) and smoking habit.

RESULTS

There were 1408 samples from 454 patients, 267 (59%) males aged at time of first sample (median = 17; range = 8-17 years) and 187 (41%) females aged 16 (10-17) years. The plasma clozapine concentration was <0.35 mg L(-1) in 36%, and ≥0.60 mg L(-1) in 31% of samples (6.4% samples ≥1.0 mg L(-1) ). Although plasma clozapine was broadly related to prescribed dose, there was much variation: 10% of samples had plasma clozapine >0.60 mg L(-1) at prescribed clozapine doses of 50-150 mg d(-1) (66% <0.35 mg L(-1) ), while 12% of samples had plasma clozapine <0.35 mg L(-1) at doses ≥650 mg d(-1) (62% >0.6 mg L(-1) ). The covariates studied in the 16-17-year-olds had proportionately similar influences to those observed in adults. Together they explained 48% of the variance observed in plasma clozapine, with dose, smoking habit, MR and sex being major influences. In the younger patients, there were very few smokers, and the influence of sex did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

As in adults, clozapine TDM may help in assessing adherence and in dose adjustment, for example if smoking habit changes.

Clinician hesitation prior to clozapine initiation: is it justifiable?

Clozapine has been endorsed by national clinical guidelines for 10 years and yet underutilisation and delay to initiation remain rife. Although there will be good clinical reasons for clozapine not being initiated for some patients, it is hypothesised here that for others, clinicians' attitudes and preferences are the most likely predictive factors.

The knowledge and attitudes of psychiatrists towards antipsychotic long-acting injections in Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic long-acting injections (LAIs) reduce covert nonadherence with medication in the clinical management of psychotic disorders. However, they are variably utilised by clinicians, especially in the long term. Factors including poor knowledge, stigma and perceived coercion can all adversely influence LAI utilisation. Previous research has emanated almost exclusively from developed countries. This study explores the knowledge and attitudes of psychiatrists and trainees in Nigeria towards LAIs.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was undertaken among mental health professionals in Nigeria using a pre-existing questionnaire.

RESULTS

Participant psychiatrists (n = 128) expressed positive attitudes towards LAIs. Their knowledge concerning LAIs and its side effects was fair. The participants reported that nearly half (41.7%) of their patients with a psychotic illness were on LAIs. Those who reported a high prescribing rate for LAIs (>40%) were more likely to endorse more positive 'patient-centred attitudes' (p < 0.04). In contrast to previous reports, psychiatrists reported that patients were less likely to feel ashamed when on LAIs, though most endorsed the statement that force was required during LAI administration.

CONCLUSION

The desirability of treatment by injections differs in Africa in comparison to Western cultures, possibly due to the increased potency that injections are perceived to have. This is perhaps evidenced by high rates reported for use of LAIs. Nigerian psychiatrists had positive attitudes to LAIs but their knowledge, particularly regarding side effects, was fair and needs to be improved. Providing information to patients prior to antipsychotic treatment may enhance informed consent in a country where medical paternalism is still relatively strong.

Plasma amisulpride in relation to prescribed dose, clozapine augmentation, and other factors: data from a therapeutic drug monitoring service, 2002-2010

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of dose and other factors on plasma amisulpride concentrations in clinical practice.

METHOD

Amisulpride therapeutic drug monitoring data 2002-2010 have been studied.

RESULTS

There were 296 samples (196 adult patients). Amisulpride was not detected in 10% of samples. In the remainder, the mean plasma amisulpride in relation to the prescribed dose (mg/day) was as follows: 100-200 (111 µg/L), 201-400 (254 µg/L), 400-800 (421 µg/L), and 800-1200 (494 µg/L). For prescribed doses up to 800 mg/day, only 51% of results were within 100-319 µg/L. There were no significant sex differences in mean plasma amisulpride or mean dose. The mean plasma amisulpride, but not the dose, was significantly higher in smokers. Linear regression analysis showed that dose explained only 42% of the variation in plasma amisulpride after log(10) transformation of both variables. There was no significant difference in the mean dose or mean plasma amisulpride in patients co-prescribed clozapine as compared with the remaining samples.

CONCLUSION

In practice, dose is a poor predictor of plasma amisulpride concentration. Therapeutic drug monitoring may not only help assess adherence, but also guide dosage.

Relationship between daily dose, plasma concentrations, dopamine receptor occupancy, and clinical response to quetiapine: a review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationships among quetiapine blood concentration, daily dose, dopamine receptor occupancy, and clinical outcome in order, if possible, to define a target plasma level range in which therapeutic response is enhanced and adverse events are minimized.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the database Embase from 1974 to March 2009 and the databases MEDLINE and PubMed from 1966 to March 2009 was conducted. The drug name quetiapine was searched with each of the terms plasma levels, plasma concentration, therapeutic drug monitoring, and dopamine occupancy.

STUDY SELECTION

The search uncovered 42 relevant articles. All published reports of quetiapine plasma or serum concentration were considered for inclusion if reported in relation to a dose, clinical outcome, or dopamine occupancy. After application of exclusion criteria, 20 articles remained.

DATA EXTRACTION

Trials designed primarily to investigate an interaction between quetiapine and another medication were excluded, as were those designed to compare methods of blood sample analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There was a weak correlation between quetiapine dose and measured plasma concentration (from trough samples). Quetiapine dose was correlated with central dopamine D(2) occupancy, although the relationship between plasma level and D(2) occupancy is less clear.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose-response relationship for (immediate-release) quetiapine is established. Data on plasma concentration-response relationships are not sufficiently robust to allow determination of a therapeutic plasma level range for quetiapine. Therapeutic drug monitoring procedures are thus probably not routinely useful in optimizing quetiapine dose. Further examination of the relationship between peak quetiapine plasma concentration and clinical response is necessary.

A nationwide cohort study of oral and depot antipsychotics after first hospitalization for schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Data on the effectiveness of antipsychotics in the early phase of schizophrenia are limited. The authors examined the risk of rehospitalization and drug discontinuation in a nationwide cohort of 2,588 consecutive patients hospitalized for the first time with a diagnosis of schizophrenia between 2000 and 2007 in Finland.

METHOD

The authors linked national databases of hospitalization, mortality, and antipsychotic prescriptions and computed hazard ratios, adjusting for the effects of sociodemographic and clinical variables, the temporal sequence of the antipsychotics used, and the choice of the initial antipsychotic for each patient.

RESULTS

Of 2,588 patients, 1,507 (58.2%) collected a prescription for an antipsychotic during the first 30 days after hospital discharge, and 1,182 (45.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]=43.7-47.6) continued their initial treatment for 30 days or longer. In a pairwise comparison between depot injections and their equivalent oral formulations, the risk of rehospitalization for patients receiving depot medications was about one-third of that for patients receiving oral medications (adjusted hazard ratio=0.36, 95% CI=0.17-0.75). Compared with oral risperidone, clozapine (adjusted hazard ratio=0.48, 95% CI=0.31-0.76) and olanzapine (adjusted hazard ratio=0.54, 95% CI=0.40-0.73) were each associated with a significantly lower rehospitalization risk. Use of any antipsychotic compared with no antipsychotic was associated with lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio=0.45, 95% CI=0.31-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In Finland, only a minority of patients adhere to their initial antipsychotic during the first 60 days after discharge from their first hospitalization for schizophrenia. Use of depot antipsychotics was associated with a significantly lower risk of rehospitalization than use of oral formulations of the same compounds. Among oral antipsychotics, clozapine and olanzapine were associated with more favorable outcomes. Use of any antipsychotic was associated with lower mortality.

Increased use of antipsychotic long-acting injections with community treatment orders

BACKGROUND

Community treatment orders (CTOs) are increasingly being used, despite a weak evidence base, and problems continue regarding Second Opinion Appointed Doctor (SOAD) certification of medication.

AIMS

The aim of the current study was to describe current CTO usage regarding patient characteristics, prescribed medication and CTO conditions.

METHOD

A 1-year prospective cohort study with consecutive sampling was conducted for all patients whose CTO was registered in a large mental health trust. Only the first CTO for each patient was included. Measures included sociodemographic variables, psychiatric diagnosis, CTO date of initiation and conditions, psychotropic medication and date of SOAD certification for medication. This study was conducted in the first year of CTO legislation in England and Wales.

RESULTS

A total of195 patients were sampled (mean age 40.6 years, 65% male, 52% black ethnic origin). There was significant geographical variability in rates of CTO use (χ(2) = 11.3, p = 0.012). A total of 53% had their place of residence specified as a condition and 29% were required to allow access into their homes. Of those with schizophrenia, 64% were prescribed an antipsychotic long-acting injection (LAI). Of the total group, 7% received high-dose antipsychotics, 10% were prescribed two antipsychotics and only 15% received SOAD certification in time.

CONCLUSIONS

There was geographical and ethnic variation in CTO use but higher rates of hospital detention in minority ethnic groups may be contributory. Most patients were prescribed antipsychotic LAIs and CTO conditions may not follow the least restrictive principle.

A systematic review of aripiprazole--dose, plasma concentration, receptor occupancy, and response: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate relationships between aripiprazole dose, plasma level, pharmacologic activity, and clinical outcome in order to evaluate the potential for therapeutic drug monitoring.

DATA SOURCES

In August 2008, we searched Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases using the keywords aripiprazole, plasma levels, plasma concentration, and therapeutic drug monitoring.

STUDY SELECTION

Twenty-one reports were retrieved. Eight studies investigating the relationship between blood concentrations of aripiprazole and dose, dopamine D(2)/D(3) occupancy, and/or outcome and adverse effects were then selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

All data concerning plasma or serum concentrations of aripiprazole were included if concentrations were reported in relation to a dose, dopamine occupancy, or clinical outcome. Those reports solely investigating drug interactions were not included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A strong correlation exists between aripiprazole dose and plasma concentration. Positron emission tomography analyses suggest that there are significant relationships between dopamine receptor occupancy and both aripiprazole dose and blood concentration. Dopamine receptor occupancy appears to reach a plateau at doses above 10 mg, supporting the observation found in dose-response studies that 10 mg/d is the optimal dose for aripiprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose range for aripiprazole is well defined, and it reliably predicts plasma level, dopamine receptor occupancy, and clinical response. Plasma level variation appears to have minimal impact on clinical response, but it may predict some adverse effects. A putative target plasma level range of between 150 and 210 ng/mL is suggested. Therapeutic drug monitoring has limited value in the clinical use of aripiprazole, but it may be useful in assuring adherence and optimizing response in individuals.

Are depot antipsychotics more coercive than tablets? The patient's perspective

Some clinicians consider depot antipsychotics to be stigmatising, coercive and unacceptable to patients. This cross-sectional study investigated patients' perspectives of coercion for depot and oral antipsychotics. In all, 72 participants with chronic mental illness on voluntary maintenance antipsychotic medication were interviewed for their views on oral and depot medication and experiences of coercion. The MacArthur Admission Experience (short form) was adapted to explore coercion regarding medication. Mean total coercion levels were higher for those on depot (depot: mean 4.39; oral: 2.80, P = 0.027), as were perceived coercion (2.52 vs 1.73, P = 0.041) and negative pressures subscales (1.17 vs 0.33, P = 0.009). No significant differences were found for the 'voice' subscale and affective reactions. Specifically, more participants on depot felt that people try to force them to take medication (30% vs 2%, P< 0.001). Depots were perceived as more coercive than oral antipsychotics. Greater perceived coercion may explain why some consider depots to be a more stigmatising form of treatment. Although forced medication is sometimes required, the experience of coercion should be minimised by giving patients a fair say in treatment decisions, regardless of formulation.

Psychiatrists' use, knowledge and attitudes to first- and second-generation antipsychotic long-acting injections: comparisons over 5 years

Psychiatrists' attitudes and knowledge about antipsychotic long-acting injections (LAIs) are important given the increasing emphasis on patient choice in treatment and the availability of second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) LAIs. A cross-sectional study of consultant psychiatrists' attitudes and knowledge in North West England was carried out. A pre-existing questionnaire on clinicians' attitudes and knowledge regarding LAIs was updated. Of 102 participants, 50% reported a decrease in their use of LAIs. LAI prescribing was evenly split between first-generation antipsychotic (FGA) and SGA-LAIs. Most regarded LAIs as associated with better adherence (89%) than tablets. A substantial proportion believed that LAIs could not be used in first-episode psychosis (38%) and that patients always preferred tablets (33%). Compared with a previous sample, the current participants scored more favourably on a patient-centred attitude subscale (60.4% vs 63.5%, P = 0.034) and significantly fewer regarded LAIs as being stigmatising and old-fashioned. Reported LAI prescribing rates have decreased in the last 5 years despite an SGA-LAI becoming available and most clinicians regarding LAIs as effective. Most attitudes and knowledge have remained stable although concerns about stigma with LAI use have decreased. Concerns about patient acceptance continue as do negative views about some aspects of LAI use; these may compromise medication choices offered to patients.

Antipsychotic long-acting injections: mind the gap

Long-acting injections of antipsychotic medication (or depots) were developed specifically to promote treatment adherence and are a valuable option for maintenance medication in psychotic illnesses. Approximately 40-60% of patients with schizophrenia are partially or totally non-adherent to their antipsychotic regimen, but only 30% or less are prescribed a long-acting injection. The use of such injections has declined in recent years after the introduction of second-generation (atypical) oral antipsychotic drugs. Research shows that possible reasons for this decline include concerns that may be based on suboptimal knowledge, as well as an erroneous assumption that one's own patient group is more adherent than those of one's colleagues. Research on attitudes has also revealed that psychiatrists feel that long-acting injections have an ;image' problem. This editorial addresses the gaps in knowledge and behaviour associated with possible underutilisation of these formulations, highlighting the role of stigma and the need for more research.

Community treatment orders and antipsychotic long-acting injections

BACKGROUND

The community treatment order (CTO) is the legal framework by which people in the community are compelled to accept treatment. Both antipsychotic long-acting injections (LAIs) and CTOs are used to address treatment non-adherence.

AIMS

To investigate the relationship between CTOs and LAI use in patients with schizophrenia.

METHOD

Prescribing, demographic and CTO data were collected for patients from four community mental health clinics in Melbourne, Australia, in 1998 and 2002.

RESULTS

Against a background of increasing use of oral second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) medication and decreasing use of LAIs, the rates of CTO implementation doubled from 13% to 26% of patients with schizophrenia between 1998 and 2002. Proportionally more patients with a CTO are prescribed LAIs rather than oral SGAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between receiving an LAI and being subject to a CTO is significant, and reflects the consideration given to enhancing adherence in a community mental health setting.

Amisulpride - dose, plasma concentration, occupancy and response: implications for therapeutic drug monitoring

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationships between dose, plasma concentration, pharmacological activity and clinical outcome to evaluate the appropriateness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients receiving amisulpride.

METHOD

Literature search of Embase, Medline and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

Amisulpride plasma concentration is closely correlated with dose (r(2) = 0.96, P < 0.0001), dopamine occupancy, response and with extra-pyramidal symptoms (EPS). Dose is correlated with response, dopamine occupancy and EPS. Optimal clinical response was found at doses of 400-800 mg/day, corresponding to plasma levels of approximately 200-500 ng/ml. EPS appears to be more reliably predicted by a plasma level above 320 ng/ml than by a particular dose.

CONCLUSION

The effects and safety of amisulpride in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder are predicted by daily dose. The plasma concentration threshold for response appears to be approximately 200 ng/ml. EPS are more reliably predicted by plasma level than by dose. TDM for patients prescribed amisulpride is thus of some clinical value.

Depot and oral antipsychotics: patient preferences and attitudes are not the same thing

Some clinicians believe that antipsychotic depot injections are unacceptable to patients. This cross-sectional study investigated patients' attitudes regarding antipsychotics, and included within-participant comparisons. Two hundred and twenty-two out-patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder completed the Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10), scales on insight, side effects and treatment preferences. Formulation preference was associated with current medication formulation: depots were preferred by 43% (33/76) on depot vs 6% (8/146) on orals (P < 0.001). Attitudes (DAI scores) regarding current formulation were influenced by illness duration, extrapyramidal symptoms and insight but not by formulation (depot vs oral). For those with experience of both formulations, participants currently on tablets scored depots less favourably than oral (4.27 vs 6.89, P < 0.001); those on depot did not differentiate. When voluntary patients on maintenance antipsychotics are asked about their attitudes to their current medication, those on depot respond similarly to those on oral. However, when asked to state a preference for formulation (depot vs oral), patients tend to favour their current formulation. Whatever leads some to switch from depot to oral, leaves a lasting negative impression of the depot and this may limit uptake of newer depots.

Psychiatric nurses' attitudes to antipsychotic depots in Hong Kong and comparison with London

Psychiatric nurses' attitudes to depots have only been explored in the UK. We conducted a cross-sectional attitudinal study for Hong Kong psychiatric nurses and also conducted international comparisons for nurses' views about depots. A pre-existing UK questionnaire on clinicians' attitudes and knowledge regarding depots was updated for the present study. Participants were 98 psychiatric nurses who attended an academic meeting. The majority of respondents had positive views regarding their role in depot administration; most reported that they had sufficient training (84%). However, many did not feel involved in treatment decision making (60%) and other negative views were expressed including: (1) most patients always prefer to have oral (vs. depot) (80%); and (2) force is sometimes required when administering a depot (40%). Interestingly, most reported that patients' friends and family were more accepting of depot (vs. oral) (69%). When compared with a former sample of London community psychiatric nurses, Hong Kong nurses had less favourable patient-focussed attitudes (mean 56% vs. 60%, P = 0.051) and depot-specific attitudes regarding depots (mean 63% vs. 69%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, therefore, international variation exists and encompasses clinical practice aspects for both the patient and the depot formulation per se. Our participants wanted more involvement in treatment decision making.

A cross-sectional study of patients' perspectives on adherence to antipsychotic medication: depot versus oral

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic depot medications improve medication adherence by reducing covert nonadherence, but some clinicians believe that they are unacceptable to patients. This cross-sectional study investigated patients' perspectives on factors influencing adherence to antipsychotics, from both those taking depots and those taking tablets in ongoing voluntary outpatient care. The study is novel in also encompassing such factors as injection phobia and perceived coercion regarding medication in relation to self-reported adherence.

METHOD

Seventy-three patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (ICD-10 criteria) completed structured clinical interviews that included the Rating of Medication Influences (ROMI) scale as well as instruments that assessed patients' functioning, psychopathology, insight, extrapyramidal symptoms, quality of life, needle anxiety, experience of coercion, and beliefs about medication.

RESULTS

Participants taking depot (vs. oral) medication had higher ROMI noncompliance mean scores (15.7 vs. 14.4, p = .019). Predictive factors for influences on noncompliance included certain beliefs regarding medication (concern and overuse) but not extrapyramidal symptoms. There were no differences between the 2 formulation groups on the ROMI compliance subscale. Further predictive factors associated with influences on compliance included perceived necessity.

CONCLUSIONS

Previously, side effects were considered to be a reason for nonadherence to depot more than for oral medications, but our findings do not support this. Rather, beliefs and attitudes are more important than side effects in predicting self-reported adherence and influencing factors thereof. Prescribing a depot medication to enhance relapse prevention will not in itself ensure adherence and therefore must also be accompanied by discussion regarding adherence and associated personal benefits.

Prospective 6-month follow-up of patients prescribed risperidone long-acting injection: factors predicting favourable outcome

Risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) is the first depot preparation of the so-called atypical antipsychotics. Efficacy is well established but effectiveness and factors predicting favourable outcome have only tentatively been evaluated. Our aim was to evaluate naturalistic outcome in patients given RLAI in normal clinical practice and to uncover factors predicting favourable outcome. Prescribers provided details of all patients prescribed RLAI on starting treatment and fortnightly thereafter. Patients were followed up for 6 months or until RLAI was discontinued. Main outcome measures were continuation with RLAI at 6 months and improvement in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score. These outcomes were compared with clinical and patient data. Of 250 patients starting RLAI, 118 (47.2%) were still receiving it at 6 months. Patients were more likely to continue treatment with RLAI to 6 months if older than 55 yr [odds ratio (OR) 3.13, 95% CI 1.32-7.40, p=0.006] and if receiving a dose of >25 mg/2 wk RLAI (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.40-3.99, p<0.001). An improvement of one point on the CGI scale (first vs. last assessment) was more likely in those prescribed RLAI because of poor prior adherence (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.35-3.86, p=0.002) and less likely in those who had previously been prescribed clozapine (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.61, p=0.001). Overall outcome of RLAI treatment is moderately good but better still when prescribed because of prior poor adherence and for more elderly patients. RLAI is less suitable for those who have previously received clozapine.

Antipsychotic depot medication and attitudes of community psychiatric nurses

Utilization of long-acting antipsychotic injections (depots) shows wide regional variation. In many countries, community psychiatric nurses (CPNs) administer depots but their concerns and attitudes regarding these drugs are seldom considered. We aimed to investigate attitudes and knowledge towards depots in a cross-sectional survey of CPNs in London, and compare them with those of psychiatrists obtained in a previous study. Three subscales of a depot attitude/knowledge questionnaire were used with additional items which referred to aspects of the CPN role. Participants were 70 CPNs who attended an academic meeting. Most CPNs reported that they were involved in treatment decisions (78%) although some CPNs seldom asked their patients about side effects (19%) and felt that they did not have sufficient time for consultations (23%) or training (23%). Several CPNs believed that depots are old fashioned (34%) and stigmatizing (44%). Compared to psychiatrists, CPNs believed more that depots compromised patient autonomy (28%, P = 0.003) and were coercive (42%, P < 0.001). Familiarity with depots and their knowledge of side effects were positively associated with favourable attitudes. CPNs have several strongly endorsed attitudes towards depot medication. Interprofessional group differences also exist which may undermine the treatment process. Training/refresher courses about depots should highlight systematic treatment decision-making and side effect monitoring which, in turn, may improve professionals' attitudes, knowledge and clinical monitoring of depots.

Early clinical experience with risperidone long-acting injection: a prospective, 6-month follow-up of 100 patients

BACKGROUND

The use of risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI) is reasonably well supported by controlled studies. Little is known about treatment outcomes in patients receiving RLAI in clinical practice.

METHOD

All prescribers in the South London and Maudsley Trust, London, United Kingdom, were informed that RLAI could be ordered for suitable patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder: those known to be noncompliant with oral atypical antipsychotics and those intolerant of the adverse effects of conventional depot antipsychotics. Prescribers provided treatment and clinical progress data at the time of each prescription. Data collected included reason for prescribing RLAI, Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI) score, inpatient or out-patient status, and details of all medications prescribed. All treatment discontinuations were investigated. The study was conducted from August 2002 to August 2003.

RESULTS

Outcome could be determined for 100 subjects. Seventy-nine subjects (79%) were hospitalized when RLAI was initially prescribed. Mean duration of stay before RLAI initiation was 97 days (range, 0-1492 days). Most subjects were switched to RLAI from oral atypical (58%) or conventional depot (28%) antipsychotics. The main reason given for prescribing RLAI was poor patient acceptability of previous treatments (79%). Overall, 51% of the subjects discontinued RLAI. The main reason for discontinuation was lack of effect (24 subjects). No patient-related factor predicted outcome. CGI scores improved from a mean of 4.7 to 3.6 over the study period (p <.001). Overall, 61 subjects (61%) showed an improvement in CGI scores between baseline and endpoint. Antipsychotic coprescriptions were reduced from 71% of subjects to 8%. In completers, 23 (61%) of 38 subjects beginning RLAI as inpatients were discharged. The modal dose of RLAI was 25 mg every 2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

RLAI was moderately effective in clinical practice as judged by attrition from treatment. CGI score changes and discharge rates also suggest moderate effectiveness. RLAI was well tolerated. Antipsychotic coprescription was infrequent.

Prognostic indicators for early discontinuation of risperidone long-acting injection

Although efficacy trials have been conducted on risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI), its most appropriate utilization in clinical practice remains unclear. This 6-month, follow-up study investigated prognostic indicators for early discontinuation of RLAI. Consecutive sampling was conducted for adult patients with a psychotic disorder commenced on RLAI, whose injection was dispensed by one of three South London psychiatric hospital pharmacies. Prescription data were collected prospectively and clinical data retrospectively. Eightly-one out of 88 (92.0%) eligible patients were included, of whom 29 (35.8%) had treatment refractoriness and 30 (37.0%) discontinued within 6 months. Patients with a preceding oral antipsychotic were more likely to discontinue RLAI than those with a preceding depot; treatment refractoriness weakly confounded this relationship [summary adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95-7.53, P=0.061]. After adjusting for preceding antipsychotic type, patients with treatment refractoriness were no more likely to discontinue than those without (summary adjusted OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.59-4.11, P=0.376). Sociodemographic factors and other clinical factors were non-predictive of discontinuation. For this first wave of patients commenced on RLAI, many had treatment refractoriness. RLAI discontinuation is high early on but subsequently tapers off. Preceding antipsychotic type (depot versus oral) is a stronger prognostic indicator than treatment refractoriness for RLAI discontinuation.

Chronic fatigue syndrome in children: a cross sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in children is a controversial diagnosis with unclear aetiology, ill defined but likely increasing incidence, and debatable clinical management options. However these children experience real and considerable suffering. Appropriate research in this clinical population is sparse and usually occurs in tertiary referral units.

METHODS

Cross sectional survey of 36 children attending a GP specialist interest clinic in southeast England.

RESULTS

Patient sociodemographics and clinical morbidity were largely comparable to the literature from tertiary referral research centres. Some prognostic indicators for adults did not readily transfer to this younger age group, although several children had a positive family psychiatric history. Receiving treatment was associated with increased school attendance, but one third of subjects obtained no qualifications. Return to normal health or significant overall improvement was reported by 29/36 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes in this setting are favourable and comparable to those seen in a controlled setting; this study supports the concept that the prognosis for CFS in children and adolescents is generally good. However, the impact of the illness is significant and this is perhaps most evident in terms of education. Current methods of reporting educational outcomes in the literature are varied and merit development of standardised tools.