Incidence of and Risk Factors for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients

Acute kidney injury in paediatric kidney transplant recipients

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in paediatric kidney transplant recipients is common. Infection including urinary tract infection (UTI) and rejection are the most common causes in children. Surgical complications often cause AKI early post-transplant, whereas BK polyomavirus nephropathy rarely occurs in the first month post-transplant. Understanding kidney physiology helps to appreciate the sensitivity of the allograft to AKI, more so than native kidneys. Although the cause of AKI is often multi-factorial, there may be an underlying process that is treatable. Eliciting the aetiology, in this regard, is of paramount importance. Pre-renal and post-renal causes of allograft dysfunction are important to distinguish from intrinsic kidney disease. Clinical information and examination of fluid balance, urine dipstick testing, blood tests, bladder and kidney transplant ultrasound, and kidney transplant biopsy remain vital assessment tools in narrowing the differential diagnosis. A careful prescribed and recreational drug history is always warranted as many drugs including supplements are nephrotoxic. Additional causes such as allograft rejection, recurrent disease, and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity need to be considered in cases of allograft dysfunction, which would not affect the native kidneys. Early detection and assessment of AKI is crucial in promoting recovery. Significant progress has been made in specific pathologies over the last 20 years, which has improved kidney allograft survival rates considerably. Research into identifying AKI biomarkers to assist early diagnosis, before the serum creatinine rises, is ongoing.

Open-label randomised clinical trial investigating whether robot-assisted kidney transplantation can reduce surgical complications compared to open kidney transplantation (ORAKTx): study protocol for a randomised clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the ultimate treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Function of the kidney graft is not only dependent on medical factors but also on a complication-free surgical procedure. In the event of major surgical complications, the kidney graft is potentially lost and the patient will return to the waiting list which may be long. To optimise peri-operative care and reduce complications, robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) has been introduced as an alternative to open kidney transplantation (OKT), but to our knowledge, no randomised clinical trials (RCT) have compared RAKT to OKT. In this study, we will explore whether robot-assisted surgery can reduce 30-day surgical complications compared to open surgery in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

This is a single-site, open-label, randomised clinical trial comparing RAKT to OKT. Participants are adult recipients of kidney transplantation recruited from Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Denmark. The study plans to include 106 participants who will be randomised in a 1:1 manner between OKT and RAKT. Primary outcomes are vascular- and major surgical complications at 30 days post-operatively. Participants will be followed for 2 years to evaluate secondary outcomes including recovery, late complications and kidney graft function. This is designed as a superiority trial and planned analyses will follow intention-to-treat principles.

DISCUSSION

Studies indicate RAKT can reduce several surgical complications, but the lack of RCTs limits the extrapolation of these results to justify replacing an open approach with a robot-assisted one. Ultimately, the introduction of new surgical techniques should be as vigorously tested as any other new treatments. However, reducing surgical complications that compromise graft viability could lead to improved patient care and survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was prospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on February 15th, 2023, with the identifier NCT05730257.

Current and emerging tools for simultaneous assessment of infection and rejection risk in transplantation

Infection and rejection are major complications that impact transplant longevity and recipient survival. Balancing their risks is a significant challenge for clinicians. Current strategies aimed at interrogating the degree of immune deficiency or activation and their attendant risks of infection and rejection are imprecise. These include immune (cell counts, function and subsets, immunoglobulin levels) and non-immune (drug levels, viral loads) markers. The shared risk factors between infection and rejection and the bidirectional and intricate relationship between both entities further complicate transplant recipient care and decision-making. Understanding the dynamic changes in the underlying net state of immunity and the overall risk of both complications in parallel is key to optimizing outcomes. The allograft biopsy is the current gold standard for the diagnosis of rejection but is associated with inherent risks that warrant careful consideration. Several biomarkers, in particular, donor derived cell-free-DNA and urinary chemokines (CXCL9 and CXCL10), show significant promise in improving subclinical and clinical rejection risk prediction, which may reduce the need for allograft biopsies in some situations. Integrating conventional and emerging risk assessment tools can help stratify the individual's short- and longer-term infection and rejection risks in parallel. Individuals identified as having a low risk of rejection may tolerate immunosuppression wean to reduce medication-related toxicity. Serial monitoring following immunosuppression reduction or escalation with minimally invasive tools can help mitigate infection and rejection risks and allow for timely diagnosis and treatment of these complications, ultimately improving allograft and patient outcomes.

Nitrofurantoin as an Add-On to Conventional Prophylaxis for the Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections in Kidney Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) constitute one of the main complications in kidney recipients, increasing both morbidity and mortality. Due to the resurgence of antimicrobial resistance, new prophylactic approaches are being investigated. Nitrofurantoin is an antibiotic from the nitrofuran group that is effective against several Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms; hence, there has been a resurgence in its prescription for treating MDR pathogens. Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of nitrofurantoin as an add-on to conventional therapy (amikacin + ceftriaxone or cefotaxime) for the treatment of urinary tract infections in kidney recipients. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, we included patients who received a kidney in a tertiary-care hospital. According to the intensive care specialist, group 1 patients were treated with the conventional prophylactic treatment plus nitrofurantoin as an add-on. Group 2 patients were treated only with the conventional prophylactic treatment. They were followed-up for 3 months, and the incidence of urinary tract infections was reported. Results: The UTI incidence for group 1 at 3 months was 20.6%, and for group 2, it was 20.0%; no statistical difference between treatments was observed (p = 0.9). The most commonly isolated pathogens were E. coli (28.5) and K. pneumonie (28.5%). The factor most associated with developing a UTI was female gender (aHR: 7.0; 95% IC 2.3-20.9, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our cohort study, nitrofurantoin as an add-on in conventional therapy did not prove to be effective in preventing UTI development; therefore, other treatment options should be considered as a part of prophylactic treatment.

Effect of increasing age and ureteral stent implantation on urinary tract infections after kidney transplantation - update of recent literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to present the recent literature regarding effects of aging and ureteral stent implantation (UrS) on the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in kidney transplant (KTX) recipients.

RECENT FINDINGS

UTIs in kidney transplant recipients remain a clinical challenge and represent a leading cause of morbidity, hospitalization rates, and mortality. Higher age was described as a significant risk factor for UTIs in several studies including a recent Brazilian analysis, indicating a 3.6%/years of age increase in UTI risk. Subsequently, a large meta-analysis, published in 2023, confirmed the correlation between older age and elevated UTI risk. The Swiss Transplant Cohort Study in 2022, largest of its kind, similarly confirmed a link between advanced age and heightened risk of recurrent UTIs in KTX. A recent prospective study highlighted UrS placement as a modifiable risk factor, emphasizing the need for careful consideration and antibiotic prophylaxis. Additionally, the type of stents played a crucial role, with external stents associated with a 1.69 times higher UTI risk. The challenge of determining optimal UrS removal timing further complicates posttransplant care, with insufficient evidence to guide practices.

SUMMARY

The aging population of KTX recipients requires a personalized approach to effectively reduce and manage UTIs as one of the most important complications following KTX. Prophylactic stent implantation is successful in lowering ureteral complications, however, is associated with an increased incidence of UTIs. To reduce the increased risk of UTIs, the length of stent insertion requires strict supervision and maintenance.