1
|
Garakh Z, Larionova E, Shmukler A, Horáček J, Zaytseva Y. EEG alpha reactivity on eyes opening discriminates patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 161:211-221. [PMID: 38522267 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Alpha activity in the electroencephalogram (EEG) is typically dominant during rest with closed eyes but suppressed by visual stimulation. Previous research has shown that alpha-blockade is less pronounced in schizophrenia patients compared to healthy individuals, but no studies have examined it in schizoaffective disorder. METHODS A resting state EEG was used for the analysis of the alpha-reactivity between the eyes closed and the eyes opened conditions in overall (8 - 13 Hz), low (8 - 10 Hz) and high (10 - 13 Hz) alpha bands in three groups: schizophrenia patients (SC, n = 30), schizoaffective disorder (SA, n = 30), and healthy controls (HC, n = 36). All patients had their first psychotic episode and were receiving antipsychotic therapy. RESULTS A significant decrease in alpha power was noted across all subjects from the eyes-closed to eyes-open condition, spanning all regions. Alpha reactivity over the posterior regions was lower in SC compared to HC within overall and high alpha. SA showed a trend towards reduced alpha reactivity compared to HC, especially evident over the left posterior region within the overall alpha. Alpha reactivity was more pronounced over the middle and right posterior regions of SA as compared to SC, particularly in the high alpha. Alpha reactivity in SC and SA patients was associated with various negative symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Our findings imply distinct alterations in arousal mechanisms in SC and SA and their relation to negative symptomatology. Arousal is more preserved in SA. SIGNIFICANCE This study is the first to compare the EEG features of arousal in SC and SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhanna Garakh
- Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ekaterina Larionova
- Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Shmukler
- National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology named after V. Serbsky , Moscow, Russia
| | - Jiří Horáček
- National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia
| | - Yuliya Zaytseva
- National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czechia; Institute of Medical Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lehmann I, Zielasek J, Blumenröder T, Engemann S, Vrinssen J, Gaebel W, Banger M, Grümmer M, Janssen B, Marggraf R, Muysers J, Rinckens S, Scherbaum N, Supprian T, Tönnesen-Schlack A, Mennicken R, Wenzel-Jankowski M, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. Development and implementation of quality indicators in a group of nine psychiatric hospitals. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2023; 182-183:8-16. [PMID: 37884419 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Quality indicators (QI) are becoming increasingly important in mental healthcare in Germany. QI can be used for various purposes, such as for creating transparency as well as for benchmarking between hospitals. QI themselves are subject to high quality standards. The aim of this report is to describe the development and implementation of QI in a group of psychiatric hospitals. Since 2015, the LVR hospital group has developed and gradually implemented QI for the purposes of quality measurement, quality assurance and internal benchmarking in its nine psychiatric hospitals in a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, scientifically accompanied process. The full LVR-QI set, consisting of eight structure-, twelve process- and four outcome indicators as well as one patient satisfaction questionnaire, was implemented by 2019. In order to create high documentation quality and acceptance by clinicians, various implementation and dissemination strategies were used, such as written documentation manuals, staff training as well as regular face-to-face communication between the LVR hospitals, the LVR Institute for Health Services Research as the central coordinating body and the headquarters of the LVR hospital group. The QI led to a quality-oriented dialogue within and between the LVR hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabell Lehmann
- LVR-Institute for Education and Research, LVR-Institute for Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jürgen Zielasek
- LVR-Institute for Education and Research, LVR-Institute for Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany; Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Tilman Blumenröder
- LVR-Institute for Education and Research, LVR-Institute for Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sandra Engemann
- LVR-Institute for Education and Research, LVR-Institute for Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jürgen Vrinssen
- LVR-Institute for Education and Research, LVR-Institute for Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Gaebel
- LVR-Institute for Education and Research, LVR-Institute for Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany; Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; WHO Collaborating Center DEU-131, LVR-Hospital Düsseldorf - Clinics of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Norbert Scherbaum
- LVR-Hospital Essen, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tillmann Supprian
- LVR-Hospital Düsseldorf - Clinics of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Roman Mennicken
- LVR-Hospital Group, Cologne, Germany; FOM University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
- LVR-Institute for Education and Research, LVR-Institute for Health Services Research, Cologne, Germany; LVR-Hospital Cologne, Academic Hospital of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Georgaca E, Plataniti P, Vardoulaki A, Pampouchidou M, Nomidou A, Chondros P. Assessing quality of care and observance of human rights in residential mental health facilities in Greece through the WHO QualityRights tool kit. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2023; 58:59-68. [PMID: 36054217 DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
In this paper, we present and reflect upon the process of evaluating two residential mental health facilities in Thessaloniki, Greece, through the WHO QualityRights tool kit. The QualityRights tool kit is a structured process for assessing quality of care and human rights in mental health and social care facilities, in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), introduced by the World Health Organization in 2012. We have piloted the use of the Toolkit in two supported accommodation facilities, a hostel and a service supervising independent living in apartments, for individuals with long-term severe mental health problems in the region of Thessaloniki. In this paper, we present the methodology and process of evaluating the facilities, including the challenges posed to the evaluation process by restrictions due to the Covid-19 pandemic. We showcase the outcome of this evaluation through presenting a summary of the results and the ensuing recommendations for improvement. Finally, we reflect on the usefulness, appropriateness and relevance of the Toolkit for evaluating mental health care facilities in the particular context of contemporary Greece.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenie Georgaca
- School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Panagiota Plataniti
- School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Maria Pampouchidou
- School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Nomidou
- Association of Families/Carers and Friends for Mental Health, Alzheimer's Disease and related disorders SOFPSI N. SERRON, Greece and Panhellenic Federation of Organisations and Associations for Mental Health POSOPSI, Serrres, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soldini E, Alippi M, Zufferey MC, Lisi A, Lucchini M, Albanese E, Colombo RA, Rossa S, Bolla E, Mellacqua ZB, Larghi G, Cordasco S, Kawohl W, Crivelli L, Traber R. Effectiveness of crisis resolution home treatment for the management of acute psychiatric crises in Southern Switzerland: a natural experiment based on geography. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:405. [PMID: 35715789 PMCID: PMC9204869 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04020-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Crisis Resolution Home Treatment (CRHT) is an alternative to inpatient treatment for acute psychiatric crises management. However, evidence on CRHT effectiveness is still limited. In the Canton of Ticino (Southern Switzerland), in 2016 the regional public psychiatric hospital replaced one acute ward with a CRHT. The current study was designed within this evaluation setting to assess the effectiveness of CRHT compared to standard inpatient treatment. METHODS CRHT was offered to patients aged 18 to 65 with an acute psychiatric crisis that would have required hospitalization. We used a natural experiment based on geography, where intervention and control groups were formed according to the place of residence. Primary endpoints were reduction of psychiatric symptoms at discharge measured using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales, treatment duration in days, and rate and length of readmissions during a two-year follow-up period after discharge. Safety during the treatment period was measured with the number of serious adverse events (suicide/suicide attempts, major self-harm episodes, acute alcohol/drug intoxications, aggressions to caregivers or family members). We used linear, log-linear and logistic regression models with propensity scores for the main analysis. RESULTS We enrolled 321 patients; 67 were excluded because the treatment period was too short and 17 because they were transferred before the end of the treatment. Two hundred thirty-seven patients were available for data analysis, 93 in the intervention group and 144 in the control group. No serious adverse event was observed during the treatment period in both groups. Reduction of psychiatric symptoms at discharge (p-value = 0.359), readmission rates (p-value = 0.563) and length of readmissions (p-value = 0.770) during the two-year follow-up period did not differ significantly between the two groups. Treatment duration was significantly higher in the treatment group (+ 29.6% on average, p-value = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS CRHT was comparable to standard hospitalization in terms of psychiatric symptoms reduction, readmission rates and length of readmissions, but it was also characterized by a longer first treatment period. However, observational evidence following the study indicated that CRHT duration constantly lowered over time since its introduction in 2016 and became comparable to hospitalization, showing therefore to be an effective alternative also in terms of treatment length. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN38472626 (17/11/2020, retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emiliano Soldini
- Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928, Manno, Switzerland.
| | - Maddalena Alippi
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Maria Caiata Zufferey
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Angela Lisi
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Mario Lucchini
- grid.7563.70000 0001 2174 1754Department of Sociology and Social Research, Università Degli Studi Di Milano Bicocca, piazza dell’Ateneo nuovo 1, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Emiliano Albanese
- grid.29078.340000 0001 2203 2861Institute of Public Health (IPH), Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università Della Svizzera Italiana, Via Giuseppe Buffi 13, CH-6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Raffaella Ada Colombo
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Simona Rossa
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Emilio Bolla
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Zefiro Benedetto Mellacqua
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppina Larghi
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Severino Cordasco
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| | - Wolfram Kawohl
- Clienia Schlössli, Psychiatric Hospital, Schlösslistrasse 8, 8618 Oetwil Am See, Switzerland
| | - Luca Crivelli
- grid.16058.3a0000000123252233Department of Business Economics, Health and Social Care, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, Palazzo E, Via Cantonale 16e, CH-6928 Manno, Switzerland
| | - Rafael Traber
- grid.482997.90000 0001 1091 9932Cantonal Psychiatric Clinic, Organizzazione Sociopsichiatrica Cantonale, Via Agostino Maspoli 6, CH-6850 Mendrisio, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vita A, Gaebel W, Mucci A, Sachs G, Barlati S, Giordano GM, Nibbio G, Nordentoft M, Wykes T, Galderisi S. European Psychiatric Association guidance on treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2022; 65:e57. [PMID: 36059103 PMCID: PMC9532218 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although cognitive impairment is a core symptom of schizophrenia related to poorer outcomes in different functional domains, it still remains a major therapeutic challenge. To date, no comprehensive treatment guidelines for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia are implemented. Methods The aim of the present guidance paper is to provide a comprehensive meta-review of the current available evidence-based treatments for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. The guidance is structured into three sections: pharmacological treatment, psychosocial interventions, and somatic treatments. Results Based on the reviewed evidence, this European Psychiatric Association guidance recommends an appropriate pharmacological management as a fundamental starting point in the treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. In particular, second-generation antipsychotics are recommended for their favorable cognitive profile compared to first-generation antipsychotics, although no clear superiority of a single second-generation antipsychotic has currently been found. Anticholinergic and benzodiazepine burdens should be kept to a minimum, considering the negative impact on cognitive functioning. Among psychosocial interventions, cognitive remediation and physical exercise are recommended for the treatment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Noninvasive brain stimulation techniques could be taken into account as add-on therapy. Conclusions Overall, there is definitive progress in the field, but further research is needed to develop specific treatments for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. The dissemination of this guidance paper may promote the development of shared guidelines concerning the treatment of cognitive functions in schizophrenia, with the purpose to improve the quality of care and to achieve recovery in this population.
Collapse
|
6
|
Vita A, Gaebel W, Mucci A, Sachs G, Erfurth A, Barlati S, Zanca F, Giordano GM, Birkedal Glenthøj L, Nordentoft M, Galderisi S. European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2022; 65:e58. [PMID: 36059109 PMCID: PMC9532219 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Impairment in a wide range of cognitive abilities has been consistently reported in individuals with schizophrenia. Both neurocognitive and social cognitive deficits are thought to underlie severe functional disabilities associated with schizophrenia. Despite the key role in schizophrenia outcome, cognition is still poorly assessed in both research and clinical settings. Methods In this guidance paper, we provide a systematic review of the scientific literature and elaborate several recommendations for the assessment of cognitive functions in schizophrenia both in research settings and in real-world clinical practice. Results Expert consensus and systematic reviews provided guidance for the optimal assessment of cognitive functions in schizophrenia. Based on the reviewed evidence, we recommend a comprehensive and systematic assessment of neurocognitive and social cognitive domains in schizophrenia, in all phases of the disorder, as well as in subjects at risk to develop psychosis. This European Psychiatric Association guidance recommends not only the use of observer reports but also self-reports and interview-based cognitive assessment tools. The guidance also provides a systematic review of the state of the art of assessment in the first episode of psychosis patients and in individuals at risk for psychosis. Conclusion The comprehensive review of the evidence and the recommendations might contribute to advance the field, allowing a better cognitive assessment, and avoiding overlaps with other psychopathological dimensions. The dissemination of this guidance paper may promote the development of shared guidelines concerning the assessment of cognitive functions in schizophrenia, with the purpose to improve the quality of care and to obtain recovery.
Collapse
|
7
|
Galderisi S, Kaiser S, Bitter I, Nordentoft M, Mucci A, Sabé M, Giordano GM, Nielsen MØ, Glenthøj LB, Pezzella P, Falkai P, Dollfus S, Gaebel W. EPA guidance on treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2021; 64:e21. [PMID: 33726883 PMCID: PMC8057437 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Negative symptoms of schizophrenia remain a major therapeutic challenge. The progress in the conceptualization and assessment is not yet fully reflected by treatment research. Nevertheless, there is a growing evidence base regarding the effects of biological and psychosocial interventions on negative symptoms. The importance of the distinction between primary and secondary negative symptoms for treatment selection might seem evident, but the currently available evidence remains limited. Good clinical practice is recommended for the treatment of secondary negative symptoms. Antipsychotic treatment should be optimized to avoid secondary negative symptoms due to side effects and due to positive symptoms. For most available interventions, further evidence is needed to formulate sound recommendations for primary, persistent, or predominant negative symptoms. However, based on currently available evidence recommendations for the treatment of undifferentiated negative symptoms (including both primary and secondary negative symptoms) are provided. Although it has proven difficult to formulate an evidence-based recommendation for the choice of an antipsychotic, a switch to a second-generation antipsychotic should be considered for patients who are treated with a first-generation antipsychotic. Antidepressant add-on to antipsychotic treatment is an option. Social skills training is recommended as well as cognitive remediation for patients who also show cognitive impairment. Exercise interventions also have shown promise. Finally, access to treatment and to psychosocial rehabilitation should be ensured for patients with negative symptoms. Overall, there is definitive progress in the field, but further research is clearly needed to develop specific treatments for negative symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Galderisi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - S Kaiser
- Division of Adult Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - I Bitter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - M Nordentoft
- Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - A Mucci
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - M Sabé
- Division of Adult Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G M Giordano
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - M Ø Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, Glostrup, Denmark.,Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - L B Glenthøj
- Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - P Pezzella
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - P Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Dollfus
- Service de Psychiatrie, CHU de Caen, 14000Caen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, ISTS EA 7466, GIP Cyceron, 14000Caen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UFR de Médecine, 14000Caen, France
| | - W Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Galderisi S, Mucci A, Dollfus S, Nordentoft M, Falkai P, Kaiser S, Giordano GM, Vandevelde A, Nielsen MØ, Glenthøj LB, Sabé M, Pezzella P, Bitter I, Gaebel W. EPA guidance on assessment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2021; 64:e23. [PMID: 33597064 PMCID: PMC8080207 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background During the last decades, a renewed interest for negative symptoms (NS) was brought about by the increased awareness that they interfere severely with real-life functioning, particularly when they are primary and persistent. Methods In this guidance paper, we provide a systematic review of the evidence and elaborate several recommendations for the conceptualization and assessment of NS in clinical trials and practice. Results Expert consensus and systematic reviews have provided guidance for the optimal assessment of primary and persistent negative symptoms; second-generation rating scales, which provide a better assessment of the experiential domains, are available; however, NS are still poorly assessed both in research and clinical settings. This European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance recommends the use of persistent negative symptoms (PNS) construct in the context of clinical trials and highlights the need for further efforts to make the definition of PNS consistent across studies in order to exclude as much as possible secondary negative symptoms. We also encourage clinicians to use second-generation scales, at least to complement first-generation ones. The EPA guidance further recommends the evidence-based exclusion of several items included in first-generation scales from any NS summary or factor score to improve NS measurement in research and clinical settings. Self-rated instruments are suggested to further complement observer-rated scales in NS assessment. Several recommendations are provided for the identification of secondary negative symptoms in clinical settings. Conclusions The dissemination of this guidance paper may promote the development of national guidelines on negative symptom assessment and ultimately improve the care of people with schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Galderisi
- Department of Psychiatry, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - A Mucci
- Department of Psychiatry, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - S Dollfus
- CHU de Caen, Service de Psychiatrie, 14000Caen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, ISTS EA 7466, GIP Cyceron, 14000Caen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UFR de Médecine, 14000Caen, France
| | - M Nordentoft
- Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - P Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Kaiser
- Division of Adult Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G M Giordano
- Department of Psychiatry, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - A Vandevelde
- CHU de Caen, Service de Psychiatrie, 14000Caen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, ISTS EA 7466, GIP Cyceron, 14000Caen, France.,Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UFR de Médecine, 14000Caen, France
| | - M Ø Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, Glostrup, Denmark.,Center for Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CNSR, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - L B Glenthøj
- Copenhagen Research Centre for Mental Health (CORE), Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Centre for Clinical Intervention and Neuropsychiatric Schizophrenia Research, CINS, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - M Sabé
- Division of Adult Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - P Pezzella
- Department of Psychiatry, Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - I Bitter
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - W Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mötteli S, Adamus C, Deb T, Fröbel R, Siemerkus J, Richter D, Jäger M. Independent Supported Housing for Non-homeless People With Serious Mental Illness: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:798275. [PMID: 35126208 PMCID: PMC8814620 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.798275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Independent supported housing (ISH)-services to support independent housing are recommended by current guidelines. However, there is little evidence of ISH models for non-homeless people with severe mental illness (SMI). The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of ISH by comparing the clinical outcomes of a newly implemented ISH service with regular housing and support services. METHODS A total of 58 adults with a broad spectrum of mental disorders experiencing housing problems were randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG) with the possibility to use the ISH service in Zurich providing targeted, individual and flexible support for housing problems or to the control group (CG) with regular housing and support services currently available (trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03815604). RESULTS After 12 months, almost all participants of the IG were able to live independently and need for inpatient treatment could be significantly reduced. Service utilization varied between 2 and 79 h. In the CG, 70% of the participants wanted to join a waiting list for the ISH service. The results indicated that IHS was comparable to regular housing and support services in terms of social inclusion and other social and clinical outcomes such as quality of life, capabilities, needs, mental state and functioning (p's > 0.05). The costs of service utilization were on average 115 Swiss Francs (about 124 USD) per participant per month. CONCLUSIONS ISH is an effective service in housing rehabilitation in terms of social and clinical outcomes and costs. ISH is strongly preferred by service users. In line with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, access to ISH services for non-homeless people with SMI should be improved. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03815604, December 04, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Mötteli
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christine Adamus
- Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.,Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Universitäre Psychiatrische Dienste Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tim Deb
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rahel Fröbel
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jakob Siemerkus
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dirk Richter
- Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.,Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Universitäre Psychiatrische Dienste Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wasserman D, Apter G, Baeken C, Bailey S, Balazs J, Bec C, Bienkowski P, Bobes J, Ortiz MFB, Brunn H, Bôke Ö, Camilleri N, Carpiniello B, Chihai J, Chkonia E, Courtet P, Cozman D, David M, Dom G, Esanu A, Falkai P, Flannery W, Gasparyan K, Gerlinger G, Gorwood P, Gudmundsson O, Hanon C, Heinz A, Dos Santos MJH, Hedlund A, Ismayilov F, Ismayilov N, Isometsä ET, Izakova L, Kleinberg A, Kurimay T, Reitan SK, Lecic-Tosevski D, Lehmets A, Lindberg N, Lundblad KA, Lynch G, Maddock C, Malt UF, Martin L, Martynikhin I, Maruta NO, Matthys F, Mazaliauskiene R, Mihajlovic G, Peles AM, Miklavic V, Mohr P, Ferrandis MM, Musalek M, Neznanov N, Ostorharics-Horvath G, Pajević I, Popova A, Pregelj P, Prinsen E, Rados C, Roig A, Kuzman MR, Samochowiec J, Sartorius N, Savenko Y, Skugarevsky O, Slodecki E, Soghoyan A, Stone DS, Taylor-East R, Terauds E, Tsopelas C, Tudose C, Tyano S, Vallon P, Van der Gaag RJ, Varandas P, Vavrusova L, Voloshyn P, Wancata J, Wise J, Zemishlany Z, Öncü F, Vahip S. Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 63:e82. [PMID: 32829740 PMCID: PMC7576531 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Compulsory admission procedures of patients with mental disorders vary between countries in Europe. The Ethics Committee of the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) launched a survey on involuntary admission procedures of patients with mental disorders in 40 countries to gather information from all National Psychiatric Associations that are members of the EPA to develop recommendations for improving involuntary admission processes and promote voluntary care. Methods. The survey focused on legislation of involuntary admissions and key actors involved in the admission procedure as well as most common reasons for involuntary admissions. Results. We analyzed the survey categorical data in themes, which highlight that both medical and legal actors are involved in involuntary admission procedures. Conclusions. We conclude that legal reasons for compulsory admission should be reworded in order to remove stigmatization of the patient, that raising awareness about involuntary admission procedures and patient rights with both patients and family advocacy groups is paramount, that communication about procedures should be widely available in lay-language for the general population, and that training sessions and guidance should be available for legal and medical practitioners. Finally, people working in the field need to be constantly aware about the ethical challenges surrounding compulsory admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Wasserman
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental-Ill Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Apter
- French Federation of Psychiatry, Paris, France.,Groupe Hospitalier du Havre, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - C Baeken
- Flemish Association of Psychiatry, Kortenberg, Belgium.,Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychiatry, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - S Bailey
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - J Balazs
- Hungarian Psychiatric Association, Budapest, Hungary.,Department of Developmental and Clinical Child Psychology at the Institute Psychology Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - C Bec
- National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental-Ill Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Bienkowski
- Polish Psychiatric Association, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Psychiatry, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J Bobes
- Spanish Society of Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - M F Bravo Ortiz
- Association of Psychiatrists of Spanish Association of Neuropsychiatry, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health, La Paz University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Brunn
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Danish Psychiatric Association, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ö Bôke
- Psychiatric Association of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey
| | - N Camilleri
- Maltese Association of Psychiatry, Attard, Malta.,University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - B Carpiniello
- European Psychiatric Association Council of National Psychiatric Associations, Strasbourg, France.,Italian Psychiatric Association, Roma, Italy.,Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Università degli studi di Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - J Chihai
- Society of Psychiatrists, Narcologists, Psychotherapists, and Clinical Psychologists from the Republic of Moldova, Chișinău, Moldova.,Department of State Medical and Pharmaceutical University "Nicolae Testemitanu", Chișinău, Republic of Moldova
| | - E Chkonia
- Society of Georgian Psychiatrists, Tbilisi, Georgia.,Department of Psychiatry, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - P Courtet
- French Congress of Psychiatry, Paris, France.,University of Montpellier, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - D Cozman
- Romanian Association of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bucharest, Romania.,Medical Psychology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-NapocaRomania
| | - M David
- French Federation of Psychiatry, Paris, France.,Fondation Bon Sauveur, Bégard, France
| | - G Dom
- Belgium Professional Association of Medical Specialists in Psychiatry, Brussel, Belgium.,Department of Psychiatry, Antwerp University (UA), Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - A Esanu
- Society of Psychiatrists, Narcologists, Psychotherapists, and Clinical Psychologists from the Republic of Moldova, Chișinău, Moldova.,Department of Psychiatry, Narcology and Medical Psychology, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chișinău, Republic of Moldova
| | - P Falkai
- German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Berlin, Germany.,Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W Flannery
- College of Psychiatrists of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Adult Psychiatry, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - K Gasparyan
- Armenian Psychiatric Association, Yerevan, Armenia.,Medical Psychology Department, Yerevan State Mkhitar Herats Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - G Gerlinger
- German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Gorwood
- French Congress of Psychiatry, Paris, France.,Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), University of ParisParis, France
| | - O Gudmundsson
- Icelandic Psychiatric Association, Kopavogur, Iceland.,Psychiatric Department, Landspitali, University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - C Hanon
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Regional Resource Center of old age Psychiatry, AP-HP Centre - Université de Paris, Corentin-Celton Hospital, Paris, France
| | - A Heinz
- German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Berlin, Germany.,Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M J Heitor Dos Santos
- Portuguese Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.,Institute of Environmental Health (ISAMB) of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon (FMUL), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - A Hedlund
- Swedish Psychiatry Association, Sundsvall, Sweden.,North Stockholm Psychiatry, Stockholm County Medical Area (SLSO), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Ismayilov
- Azerbaijan Psychiatric Association, Baku, Azerbaijan.,National Mental Health Centre, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - N Ismayilov
- Azerbaijan Psychiatric Association, Baku, Azerbaijan.,Department of Psychiatry, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - E T Isometsä
- Finnish Psychiatric Association, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - L Izakova
- Slovak Psychiatric Association, Bratislava, Slovakia.,Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Comenius University and University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - A Kleinberg
- Estonian Psychiatric Association, Tartu, Estonia.,Children Mental Health Centre of Tallinn Children Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - T Kurimay
- European Psychiatric Association Council of National Psychiatric Associations, Strasbourg, France.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Teaching Department of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - S Klæbo Reitan
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Teaching Department of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.,Norwegian Psychiatric Association, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norweigan University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - D Lecic-Tosevski
- Serbian Psychiatric Association, Belgrade, Serbia.,Psychiatric Association of Eastern Europe and the Balkans, Athens, Greece.,Department of Medical Sciences, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - A Lehmets
- Estonian Psychiatric Association, Tartu, Estonia.,Psychiatric Centre of the Tallinn West Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - N Lindberg
- Finnish Psychiatric Association, Helsinki, Finland.,Forensic Psychiatry, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinski, Finland
| | - K A Lundblad
- Swedish Psychiatry Association, Sundsvall, Sweden.,Adult Psychiatry, Stockholm County Medical Area (SLSO), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Lynch
- Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Maddock
- Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
| | - U F Malt
- Norwegian Psychiatric Association, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - L Martin
- College of Psychiatrists of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,St Loman's Hospital, Mullingar, Ireland
| | - I Martynikhin
- Russian Society of Psychiatrists, Moscow, Russian Federation.,First Pavlov State Medical University of St Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - N O Maruta
- Association of Neurologists, Psychiatrists and Narcologists of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.,Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the NAMS of Ukraine State Insitution, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - F Matthys
- Flemish Association of Psychiatry, Kortenberg, Belgium.,Department of Psychiatry, Universitair Ziekenhuis, Brussel, Belgium
| | - R Mazaliauskiene
- Lithuanian Psychiatric Association, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Psychiatric Clinic, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - G Mihajlovic
- Serbian Psychiatric Association, Belgrade, Serbia.,Clinic for Psychiatry, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - A Mihaljevic Peles
- Croatian Psychiatric Association, Zagreb, Croatia.,Zagreb School of Medicine and Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - V Miklavic
- Slovenian Psychiatric Association, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - P Mohr
- Czech Psychiatric Association, Prague, Czech Republic.,Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Munarriz Ferrandis
- Association of Psychiatrists of Spanish Association of Neuropsychiatry, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Musalek
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Institute for Social Aesthetics and Mental Health, Vienna, Austria.,Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - N Neznanov
- Russian Society of Psychiatrists, Moscow, Russian Federation.,St. Petersburg V.M. Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | - I Pajević
- Psychiatric Association of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.,Department of Psychiatry, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - A Popova
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,College Private Psychiatry of Bulgaria, Sofia, Bulgaria.,Nikola Shipkovenski Mental Health Centre, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - P Pregelj
- Slovenian Psychiatric Association, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - E Prinsen
- Netherlands Psychiatric Association, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - C Rados
- Austrian Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Villach State Hospital, Villach, Austria
| | - A Roig
- Association of Psychiatrists of Spanish Association of Neuropsychiatry, Madrid, Spain.,Mental Health Centre, Horta-Guinardó, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Rojnic Kuzman
- Croatian Psychiatric Association, Zagreb, Croatia.,Zagreb School of Medicine and Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - J Samochowiec
- Polish Psychiatric Association, Warsaw, Poland.,European Psychiatric Association Council of National Psychiatric Associations, Strasbourg, France.,Department of Psychiatry Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - N Sartorius
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Association for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes (AMH), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Y Savenko
- Independent Psychiatric Association of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - O Skugarevsky
- Belarusian Psychiatric Association, Minsk, Belarus.,Psychiatry and Medical Psychology Department, Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus
| | - E Slodecki
- Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Soghoyan
- Armenian Psychiatric Association, Yerevan, Armenia.,Center of Psychosocial Recovery, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - D S Stone
- National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental-Ill Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Taylor-East
- Maltese Association of Psychiatry, Attard, Malta.,University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - E Terauds
- Latvian Psychiatric Association, Riga, Latvia.,Department of Psychiatry and Narcology, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
| | - C Tsopelas
- Psychiatric Association of Eastern Europe and the Balkans, Athens, Greece.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - C Tudose
- Romanian Association of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Psychiatry "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - S Tyano
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France
| | - P Vallon
- Swiss Society of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R J Van der Gaag
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy Stradina Department, University of Riga, Riga, Latvia
| | - P Varandas
- Portuguese Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.,Casa de Saúde da Idanha and San José Psychiatric Clinic Instituto das Irmãs Hospitaleiras do Sagrado Coração de Jesus, Belas, Portugal
| | - L Vavrusova
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Slovak Psychiatric Association, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - P Voloshyn
- Association of Neurologists, Psychiatrists and Narcologists of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.,Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - J Wancata
- Austrian Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria.,Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Wise
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,CNWL NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Z Zemishlany
- Israel Psychiatric Association, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - F Öncü
- Psychiatric Association of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.,Forensic Psychiatry Department, Bakirkoy Research and Training Hospital for Psychiatry, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - S Vahip
- European Psychiatric Association Council of National Psychiatric Associations, Strasbourg, France.,Department of Psychiatry, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gaebel W, Kerst A, Janssen B, Becker T, Musalek M, Rössler W, Ruggeri M, Thornicroft G, Zielasek J, Stricker J. EPA guidance on the quality of mental health services: A systematic meta-review and update of recommendations focusing on care coordination. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 63:e75. [PMID: 32703326 PMCID: PMC7443789 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of mental health services is crucial for the effectiveness and efficiency of mental healthcare systems, symptom reduction, and quality of life improvements in persons with mental illness. In recent years, particularly care coordination (i.e., the integration of care across different providers and treatment settings) has received increased attention and has been put into practice. Thus, we focused on care coordination in this update of a previous European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on the quality of mental health services. METHODS We conducted a systematic meta-review of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and evidence-based clinical guidelines focusing on care coordination for persons with mental illness in three literature databases. RESULTS We identified 23 relevant documents covering the following topics: case management, integrated care, home treatment, crisis intervention services, transition from inpatient to outpatient care and vice versa, integrating general and mental healthcare, technology in care coordination and self-management, quality indicators, and economic evaluation. Based on the available evidence, we developed 15 recommendations for care coordination in European mental healthcare. CONCLUSIONS Although evidence is limited, some concepts of care coordination seem to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of mental health services and outcomes on patient level. Further evidence is needed to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of different care coordination models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.,WHO Collaborating Centre on Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - A Kerst
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.,WHO Collaborating Centre on Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - B Janssen
- LVR-Klinik Langenfeld, Langenfeld, Germany
| | - T Becker
- Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Germany
| | - M Musalek
- Anton Proksch Institute, Vienna, Austria
| | - W Rössler
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Psychiatric University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM 27), Institute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo; Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - M Ruggeri
- Section of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - G Thornicroft
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology &Neuroscience, King's College, London, United Kingdom
| | - J Zielasek
- LVR-Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany
| | - J Stricker
- Department of Psychiatry, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.,WHO Collaborating Centre on Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Badu E, O’Brien AP, Mitchell R, Osei A. Mediation and moderation effects of health system structure and process on the quality of mental health services in Ghana - structural equation modelling. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0233351. [PMID: 32442192 PMCID: PMC7244180 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Incorporating consumers' perspectives into the quality of mental health service measurement is a growing priority among mental health professionals' and policymakers. Despite this, there is limited empirical evidence related to consumer perspectives of quality of mental health services. This study, therefore, aims to measure the mediation and moderation effects of health system structure and process on mental health quality in Ghana. METHODS A random sample of 510 consumers were recruited to complete the Verona Satisfaction Scale (54-items), together with the WHO Disability Assessment Instrument (36 items) using the Redcap application. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modelling were used to test the hypothesised theory using STATA 15. RESULTS The CFA showed that the hypothesised model had a good fit to the data. The findings confirmed the hypothesis that the process constructs mediate the relationship between the health system structure and the outcome of mental health services. Specifically, the health system structure had a positive and significant causal relationship with the mediator-process (β = 0.60; p<0.01) and outcome (β = 0.47; p<0.01). Additionally, the mediator-process had a positive causal relationship with the outcome of the mental health services (β = 0.32; p<0.01). Insurance status (β = 0.07; p>0.05) and type of services (β = 0.025; p>0.05) had a positive moderating effect on the relationship between health system structure and outcome but were not significant. CONCLUSION Improvements to mental health system structure and the process could promote the quality of services as experienced by consumers. Government stakeholders are encouraged to accordingly strengthen health systems with the aim of improving the mental health outcomes for consumers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Badu
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Anthony Paul O’Brien
- School Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Rebecca Mitchell
- Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heun R, Gaebel W. The relevance of EPA guidance papers in the framework of the European Psychiatric Association. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 30:357-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
14
|
European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on quality assurance in mental healthcare. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 30:360-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2015] [Revised: 01/28/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractPurpose:To advance the quality of mental healthcare in Europe by developing guidance on implementing quality assurance.Methods:We performed a systematic literature search on quality assurance in mental healthcare and the 522 retrieved documents were evaluated by two independent reviewers (B.J. and J.Z.). Based on these evaluations, evidence tables were generated. As it was found that these did not cover all areas of mental healthcare, supplementary hand searches were performed for selected additional areas. Based on these findings, fifteen graded recommendations were developed and consented by the authors. Review by the EPA Guidance Committee and EPA Board led to two additional recommendations (on immigrant mental healthcare and parity of mental and physical healthcare funding).Results:Although quality assurance (measures to keep a certain degree of quality), quality control and monitoring (applying quality indicators to the current degree of quality), and quality management (coordinated measures and activities with regard to quality) are conceptually distinct, in practice they are frequently used as if identical and hardly separable. There is a dearth of controlled trials addressing ways to optimize quality assurance in mental healthcare. Altogether, seventeen recommendations were developed addressing a range of aspects of quality assurance in mental healthcare, which appear usable across Europe. These were divided into recommendations about structures, processes and outcomes. Each recommendation was assigned to a hierarchical level of analysis (macro-, meso- and micro-level).Discussion:There was a lack of evidence retrievable by a systematic literature search about quality assurance of mental healthcare. Therefore, only after further topics and search had been added it was possible to develop recommendations with mostly medium evidence levels.Conclusion:Evidence-based graded recommendations for quality assurance in mental healthcare were developed which should next be implemented and evaluated for feasibility and validity in some European countries. Due to the small evidence base identified corresponding to the practical obscurity of the concept and methods, a European research initiative is called for by the stakeholders represented in this Guidance to improve the educational, methodological and empirical basis for a future broad implementation of measures for quality assurance in European mental healthcare.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gaebel W, Möller HJ. European guidance–a project of the European Psychiatric Association. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 27:65-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2011.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2011] [Revised: 08/08/2011] [Accepted: 08/09/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractEvidence based medicine is a cornerstone of modern medicine including psychiatry. Treatment practice guidelines are nowadays available for guiding mental health care mainly with a focus on specific disorders. Many important clinical situations or problems beyond treatment, however, are lacking proper guidance. It is in this scope that a European Psychiatry Association (EPA) has developed its own program, the European Guidance Project. The present special issue presents six topics out of these series of guidance documents.
Collapse
|
16
|
Morozov PV, Maruta NA, Skugarevskiy OA. Training of psychiatrists in Eastern Europe: problems and solutions. Int Rev Psychiatry 2020; 32:145-150. [PMID: 31418604 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2019.1645645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The analysis of the training of mental health professionals in WPA Zone 10 was performed based on a comparison of data of a specifically designed questionnaire comprising 29 questions on undergraduate education, 34 questions on postgraduate training, and six questions on training of general practitioners to work in the field of mental health. The project involved National Associations of psychiatrists of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russian Federation, Uzbekistan, and Ukraine. This comparison provides an opportunity to identify ways to improve psychiatric training in Eastern Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petr V Morozov
- Department of Psychiatry, Russian National Medical Research University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Natalia A Maruta
- Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the NAMS of Ukraine, Kharkov, Ukraine
| | - Oleg A Skugarevskiy
- Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wilberforce M, Poll S, Langham H, Worden A, Challis D. Measuring the patient experience in community mental health services for older people: A study of the Net Promoter Score using the Friends and Family Test in England. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 34:31-37. [PMID: 30247775 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The research aimed to explore the value of the Net Promoter Score as a service improvement tool and an outcome measure. The study objectives were to (1) explore associations between the Net Promoter Score with patient and service-receipt characteristics; (2) evaluate the strength of association between the Net Promoter Score and a satisfaction score; and (3) evaluate its test-retest reliability. METHODS A postal survey was sent to service users on caseloads of community mental health teams for older people in four localities of England. The survey collected the Net Promoter Score, a single satisfaction question, and data on socio-demographics, clinical profile, and service receipt. Analysis used non-parametric tests of association and exploratory least squares regression. A second survey was administered for test-retest reliability analysis. Fieldwork concluded in April 2016. RESULTS For 352 respondents, the Net Promoter Score was negatively related to age and was lowest for those still within 6 months of their initial referral. Receiving support from a psychiatrist and/or support worker was linked to higher scores. A strong but imperfect correlation coefficient with the satisfaction score indicates they evaluate related but distinct constructs. It had a reasonable test-retest reliability, with a weighted kappa of 0.706. CONCLUSIONS Despite doubts over its validity in community mental health services, the Net Promoter Score may produce results of value to researchers, clinicians, service commissioners, and managers, if part of wider data collection. However, multi-item measures would provide greater breadth and improved reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Wilberforce
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, UK.,Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, UK
| | - Sarah Poll
- Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Angela Worden
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, UK
| | - David Challis
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mötteli S, Schori D, Schmidt H, Seifritz E, Jäger M. Utilization and Effectiveness of Home Treatment for People With Acute Severe Mental Illness: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis of 19 Months of Observation. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:495. [PMID: 30364109 PMCID: PMC6191514 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment guidelines recommend home treatment (HT) as an effective alternative to inpatient treatment for individuals with severe, acute mental illness (SAMI). Nevertheless, HT is largely unfamiliar in German-speaking countries. Here we examined the utilization and effectiveness of HT services newly implemented in a large hospital setting in Switzerland. We used a naturalistic observational study design including patients (n = 201, 18-65 years, 65.7% females) with SAMI who received HT between June 2016 and December 2017. HT patients were compared with a crude inpatient sample (n = 1078) and a matched inpatient sample (n = 201). Propensity-score matching was used to control for personal characteristics. Treatment outcomes were compared between HT patients and the matched inpatients based on routinely obtained medical data. The results showed that the HT sample consisted of more females (+21%), older (+4 years), and better educated (+10%) patients with more affective disorders (+13%) and less substance use disorders (-15%) as compared with the crude inpatient sample. The severity of symptoms was the same. After matching, there were no significant differences in the proportion of readmissions (36%), the duration until readmission and scores of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). The treatment duration of HT patients was significantly longer and, post-treatment, scores on the Global Assessment of Functioning scale (GAF) were significantly better. We conclude that HT is an effective treatment option for patients with SAMI also in Switzerland concerning the reduction of hospital days, the improvement of symptoms and functioning and readmission rates. HT cannot fully replace hospital admissions in all cases and HT may be beneficial for particular groups of patients (e.g., females and individuals with affective disorders). The study further shows the potential value of propensity-score matching in health care service research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Mötteli
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dominik Schori
- Directorate of Nursing, Therapies and Social Work, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Helen Schmidt
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Erich Seifritz
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Jäger
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Stegbauer C, Willms G, Kleine-Budde K, Bramesfeld A, Stammann C, Szecsenyi J. Development of indicators for a nationwide cross-sectoral quality assurance procedure for mental health care of patients with schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders in Germany. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2017; 126:13-22. [PMID: 29029972 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Revised: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper describes the development of quality indicators for an external statutory and cross-sectoral quality assurance (QA) procedure in the context of the German health care system for adult patients suffering from schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders (F20-F29). METHODS Indicators were developed by a modified RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with 1) the compilation of an indicator register based on a systematic literature search and analyses of health care claims data, 2) the selection of indicators by an expert panel that rated them for relevance and for feasibility regarding implementation. Indicators rated positive for both relevance and feasibility formed the final indicator set. RESULTS 847 indicators were identified by different searches. Out of these, 56 were selected for the indicator register. During the formal consensus process the expert panel recommended another 45 indicators so that a total of 101 indicators needed to be considered by the panel. Of these, 27 indicators rated both relevant and feasible were included in the final set of indicators: this set included 4 indicators addressing structures, 19 indicators addressing processes and 4 indicators addressing outcomes. 17 indicators of the set will be reported by hospitals and 8 by psychiatric outpatient facilities. Two indicators considered to be cross-sectoral will be reported by both sectors. DISCUSSION F20-F29 and its treatment show some specific features which so far have not been addressed by any procedure within the statutory QA program of the German health care system. These features include: Schizophrenia and related disorders a) are potentially chronic conditions, b) are mainly treated in outpatient settings, c) require a multi-professional treatment approach and d) are treated regionally in catchment areas. These specific features in combination with the peculiarities of some legal, political and organizational characteristics of the German health care system and its statutory QA program have strongly influenced the development of indicators. The result was a seemingly "imbalanced" set of indicators with a greater number of indicators for inpatient than for outpatient care despite the fact that clinical reality is otherwise. CONCLUSIONS The circumstances of the German health care system that restricted the development of this cross-sectoral QA procedure addressing care for F20-F29 are also most likely to emerge with the development of cross-sectoral QA procedures for other (potentially) chronic conditions that are mainly treated in the outpatient setting by multi-professional teams or by networks of different providers. In order to be able to develop a QA procedure that mirrors the reality of service provision for (potentially) chronic diseases such as F20-F29 we need to explore further current and new data sources, diminish sectoral borders, and implement health care responsibility on the level of catchment areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constance Stegbauer
- AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Gerald Willms
- AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Katja Kleine-Budde
- AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anke Bramesfeld
- AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Göttingen, Germany; Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Carina Stammann
- AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Szecsenyi
- AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH, Göttingen, Germany; Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mueller-Stierlin AS, Helmbrecht MJ, Herder K, Prinz S, Rosenfeld N, Walendzik J, Holzmann M, Dinc U, Schützwohl M, Becker T, Kilian R. Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial. BMC Psychiatry 2017; 17:283. [PMID: 28764729 PMCID: PMC5539984 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-017-1441-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 07/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Network for Mental Health (NWpG-IC) is an integrated mental health care program implemented in 2009 by cooperation between health insurance companies and community mental health providers in Germany. Meanwhile about 10,000 patients have been enrolled. This is the first study evaluating the effectiveness of the program in comparison to standard mental health care in Germany. METHODS In a parallel-group controlled trial over 18 months conducted in five regions across Germany, a total of 260 patients enrolled in NWpG-IC and 251 patients in standard mental health care (TAU) were recruited between August 2013 and November 2014. The NWpG-IC patients had access to special services such as community-based multi-professional teams, case management, crisis intervention and family-oriented psychoeducation in addition to standard mental health care. The primary outcome empowerment (EPAS) and the secondary outcomes quality of life (WHO-QoL-BREF), satisfaction with psychiatric treatment (CSQ-8), psychosocial and clinical impairment (HoNOS) and information about mental health service needs (CAN) were measured four times at 6-month intervals. Linear mixed-effect regression models were used to estimate the main effects and interaction effects of treatment, time and primary diagnosis. Due to the non-randomised group assignment, propensity score adjustment was used to control the selection bias. RESULTS NWpG-IC and TAU groups did not differ with respect to most primary and secondary outcomes in our participating patients who showed a broad spectrum of psychiatric diagnoses and illness severities. However, a significant improvement in terms of patients' satisfaction with psychiatric care and their perception of treatment participation in favour of the NWpG-IC group was found. CONCLUSIONS Providing integrated mental health care for unspecific mentally ill target groups increases treatment participation and service satisfaction but seems not suitable to enhance the overall outcomes of mental health care in Germany. The implementation of strategies for ameliorating the needs orientation of the NWpG-IC should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00005111 , registered 26 July 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabel Sandra Mueller-Stierlin
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
- Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Katrin Herder
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - Stefanie Prinz
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - Nadine Rosenfeld
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - Julia Walendzik
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marco Holzmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Uemmueguelsuem Dinc
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - Matthias Schützwohl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Becker
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
| | - Reinhold Kilian
- Department of Psychiatry II, Ulm University, Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gaebel W. How Can Guidance Recommendations Contribute to Better Mental Health? Eur Psychiatry 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionIn European countries, the quality of mental healthcare services is often limited due to scarce and inequitable distributed resources, and inefficient use of existing resources. Against this background, the EPA Guidance provides recommendations on how to optimize quality of mental healthcare for all European countries.ObjectivesProvision of guidance recommendations in order to support optimization and harmonization of mental healthcare services in European countries.MethodsBy means of evidence and consensus-based methods EPA guidance papers are developed by experts in psychiatry and related fields [1].ResultsAs of 2012, five EPA guidance series have been developed and published [2]. They focus on various aspects of mental healthcare and clinical situations that have not been covered by medical guidelines yet but are considered important to deliver high quality mental healthcare. Papers deal amongst others with topics relating to quality assurance of mental health services, as quality of mental health service structures and processes, and building trust in mental health services.ConclusionsEPA guidance recommendations can improve mental healthcare provision and thereby contribute to better mental health of persons receiving mental healthcare. For this purpose, recommendations need to be widely disseminated and implemented in European countries.Disclosure of interestUnterstützung bei Symposien/Symposia Support− Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Neuss− Aristo Pharma GmbH, Berlin− Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg− Servier Deutschland GmbH, München− Fakultätsmitglied/Faculty Member− Lundbeck International Neuroscience Foundation (LINF), Dänemark
Collapse
|
22
|
Gaebel W, Großimlinghaus I, Mucic D, Maercker A, Zielasek J, Kerst A. EPA guidance on eMental health interventions in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Eur Psychiatry 2017; 41:140-152. [PMID: 28242486 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2016] [Revised: 01/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this EPA guidance was to develop recommendations on eMental health interventions in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A systematic literature search was performed and 40 articles were retrieved and assessed with regard to study characteristics, applied technologies, therapeutic approaches, diagnostic ascertainment, efficacy, sustainability of clinical effects, practicability and acceptance, attrition rates, safety, clinician-supported vs. non-supported interventions and active vs. waiting-list controls. The reviewed studies showed a great heterogeneity concerning study type, study samples, interventions and outcome measures. Based on these findings, five graded recommendations dealing with symptom reduction, acceptability, type of administration, clinician support, self-efficacy and coping were developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; LVR Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany; WHO Collaborating Center for Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - I Großimlinghaus
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; LVR Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany; WHO Collaborating Center for Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - D Mucic
- Treatment Centre Little Prince, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - A Maercker
- Psychopathology and Clinical Intervention, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J Zielasek
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; LVR Institute for Healthcare Research, Cologne, Germany; WHO Collaborating Center for Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - A Kerst
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany; WHO Collaborating Center for Quality Assurance and Empowerment in Mental Health, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kawohl W, Wyss C, Roser P, Brüne M, Rössler W, Juckel G. [Social psychiatry and neurobiology : A long overdue convergence exemplified by schizophrenia]. DER NERVENARZT 2016; 88:510-519. [PMID: 27491537 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-016-0179-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The proliferation of biological psychiatry has greatly increased over the last two decades. With the possibility to carry out brain research using modern technical methods, it seemed that social influencing factors would lose importance in the development of mental diseases; however, in actual fact this does not seem to be justified. It is necessary to overcome this separation, in that social factors are incorporated into a conceptual framework in the development of mental diseases, which simultaneously also takes the results of current neurobiological research into consideration. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS The aims of this review article are to summarize the current state of sociopsychiatric research and to emphasize the perspectives of the biological principles and their validity with respect to the social dimensions of psychiatry, as exemplified by schizophrenic disorders. The article presents the options for a biosocial approach in social psychiatry and gives an overview of the currently available literature. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION There is an abundance of neurobiological research approaches, which are closely associated with sociopsychiatric topics, such as social cognition. Social psychiatry and biological psychiatry should no longer be considered as diametrically opposed subdisciplines. On the contrary, the options which could emerge from a synthesis must be used in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Kawohl
- Zentrum für Soziale Psychiatrie, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Militärstr. 8, Postfach 1930, 8021, Zürich, Schweiz. .,Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz. .,Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland.
| | - C Wyss
- Zentrum für Soziale Psychiatrie, Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Psychosomatik, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Militärstr. 8, Postfach 1930, 8021, Zürich, Schweiz.,Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz
| | - P Roser
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - M Brüne
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland.,Forschungsabteilung für Kognitive Neuropsychiatrie und Psychiatrische Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - W Rössler
- Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.,Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Deutschland
| | - G Juckel
- Klinik für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Präventivmedizin, LWL-Universitätsklinik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chomienne MH, Vanneste P, Grenier J, Hendrick S. Collaboration médecine-psychologie : évolution des mentalités en Belgique et évolution du système de soins de santé au Canada. SANTE MENTALE AU QUEBEC 2016. [DOI: 10.7202/1036094ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
L’expertise des psychologues dans l’évaluation et la prise en charge des troubles communs de santé mentale comme l’anxiété et la dépression qui sont fréquents en soins primaires et co-morbides avec les maladies chroniques font des psychologues une ressource essentielle pour les médecins. Les psychologues représentent un large bassin de professionnels spécialisés dans le diagnostic et la pratique de la psychothérapie ; la collaboration médecins-psychologues est d’autant plus critique dans le contexte visant à augmenter l’accès des populations aux traitements psychologiques et aux psychothérapies. Cet article se veut un regard sur l’état de la collaboration entre médecins et psychologues en Belgique et au Canada. Il examine l’évolution des mentalités entre ces deux professions dans une perspective européenne belge et la façon dont le contexte et le système de soins de santé publique au Canada influencent le potentiel de collaboration entre ces deux professions. Les études démontrent la volonté et la facilité qu’ont ces deux professions à collaborer. Mais ceci doit être appuyé par des structures systémiques et académiques facilitantes notamment dans l’apprentissage précoce à la collaboration dans le cursus de ces professions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Hélène Chomienne
- M.D., M. Sc., Institut de recherche de l’Hôpital Montfort, Centre C.T. Lamont de recherche en soins de santé primaires, Département de médecine familiale, Université d’Ottawa
- École d’épidémiologie et santé communautaire, Université d’Ottawa
| | - Patrick Vanneste
- Ph. DS., Psychologue clinicien et psychothérapeute, Service de psychologie clinique systémique et psychodynamique, Faculté de Psychologie et Sciences de l’Éducation, Université de Mons, Belgique
| | - Jean Grenier
- Ph. D., C. Psych., Institut de recherche de l’Hôpital Montfort, Centre C.T. Lamont de recherche en soins de santé primaires, Département de médecine familiale, Université d’Ottawa
- École de psychologie, Université d’Ottawa
| | - Stephan Hendrick
- Professeur-Chef de service, Service de psychologie clinique systémique et psychodynamique, Faculté de Psychologie et Sciences de l’Éducation, Université de Mons, Belgique
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Valentini J, Ruppert D, Magez J, Stegbauer C, Bramesfeld A, Goetz K. Integrated care in German mental health services as benefit for relatives--a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16:48. [PMID: 26921216 PMCID: PMC4769565 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0760-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As mental health services undergo the process of deinstitutionalization, this is resulting in a higher burden of care for relatives. Evidence suggests that interventions for carers have a beneficial impact on their psychological health. A reduction of responsibility for relatives is linked with a significantly improved outcome for the severely mentally ill. The aim of the study was to explore the relatives' experiences with severely mentally ill patients in different integrated care service providers. METHODS Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted with 24 relatives of patients receiving community based integrated care for severe mental illness. The collected data was transcribed and evaluated using qualitative content analysis. A deductive-inductive approach was used in generating thematic categories. RESULTS Four main categories were found related to the structural aspects of the integrated care services and for the experiences of the relatives within these services. Relatives reported that the services offered significant relief and substantial support in daily life. In addition, relatives felt a reduced burden of carer responsibility and therefore that they were provided with more protection and stability. This resulted in a sense of encouragement and not feeling left alone to face challenges. CONCLUSION Relatives are a critical resource for patients suffering from mental health problems and benefit from formal structures and interventions to support them in carer role. An important need is to ensure continuity of care for patients and the bridging of gaps concerning information and support needs for relatives when providing integrated mental health services in the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Valentini
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Daniel Ruppert
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Julia Magez
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Constance Stegbauer
- AQUA - Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Anke Bramesfeld
- AQUA - Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
| | - Katja Goetz
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Institute of Family Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jobst A, Brakemeier EL, Buchheim A, Caspar F, Cuijpers P, Ebmeier KP, Falkai P, Jan van der Gaag R, Gaebel W, Herpertz S, Kurimay T, Sabaß L, Schnell K, Schramm E, Torrent C, Wasserman D, Wiersma J, Padberg F. European Psychiatric Association Guidance on psychotherapy in chronic depression across Europe. Eur Psychiatry 2016; 33:18-36. [PMID: 26854984 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2015] [Accepted: 12/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with chronic depression (CD) by definition respond less well to standard forms of psychotherapy and are more likely to be high utilizers of psychiatric resources. Therefore, the aim of this guidance paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of current psychotherapy for CD. The evidence of efficacy is critically reviewed and recommendations for clinical applications and research are given. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search to identify studies on psychotherapy in CD, evaluated the retrieved documents and developed evidence tables and recommendations through a consensus process among experts and stakeholders. RESULTS We developed 5 recommendations which may help providers to select psychotherapeutic treatment options for this patient group. The EPA considers both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy to be effective in CD and recommends both approaches. The best effect is achieved by combined treatment with psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, which should therefore be the treatment of choice. The EPA recommends psychotherapy with an interpersonal focus (e.g. the Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy [CBASP]) for the treatment of CD and a personalized approach based on the patient's preferences. DISCUSSION The DSM-5 nomenclature of persistent depressive disorder (PDD), which includes CD subtypes, has been an important step towards a more differentiated treatment and understanding of these complex affective disorders. Apart from dysthymia, ICD-10 still does not provide a separate entity for a chronic course of depression. The differences between patients with acute episodic depression and those with CD need to be considered in the planning of treatment. Specific psychotherapeutic treatment options are recommended for patients with CD. CONCLUSION Patients with chronic forms of depression should be offered tailored psychotherapeutic treatments that address their specific needs and deficits. Combination treatment with psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy is the first-line treatment recommended for CD. More research is needed to develop more effective treatments for CD, especially in the longer term, and to identify which patients benefit from which treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Jobst
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - E-L Brakemeier
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Berlin University of Psychology, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Buchheim
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - F Caspar
- Institute of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K P Ebmeier
- Department of Psychiatry, Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - P Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | | | - W Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - S Herpertz
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Kurimay
- Institute of Behaviour Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - L Sabaß
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - K Schnell
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - E Schramm
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - C Torrent
- Clinical Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, CIBERSAM, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Wasserman
- National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental lll-Health (NASP), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Wiersma
- Department of Psychiatry, GGZinGeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Abstract
Public mental health deals with mental health promotion, prevention of mental disorders and suicide, reducing mental health inequalities, and governance and organization of mental health service provision. The full impact of mental health is largely unrecognized within the public health sphere, despite the increasing burden of disease attributable to mental and behavioral disorders. Modern public mental health policies aim at improving psychosocial health by addressing determinants of mental health in all public policy areas. Stigmatization of mental disorders is a widespread phenomenon that constitutes a barrier for help-seeking and for the development of health care services, and is thus a core issue in public mental health actions. Lately, there has been heightened interest in the promotion of positive mental health and wellbeing. Effective programmes have been developed for promoting mental health in everyday settings such as families, schools and workplaces. New evidence indicates that many mental disorders and suicides are preventable by public mental health interventions. Available evidence favours the population approach over high-risk approaches. Public mental health emphasizes the role of primary care in the provision of mental health services to the population. The convincing evidence base for population-based mental health interventions asks for actions for putting evidence into practice.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Mental health care in the second half of the 20th century in much of the developed world has been dominated by the move out from large asylums. Both in response to this move and to make it possible, a pattern of care has evolved which is most commonly referred to as 'Community Psychiatry'. This narrative review describes this process, from local experimentation into the current era of evidence-based mental health care. It focuses on three main areas of this development: (i) the reprovision of care for those discharged during deinstitutionalisation; (ii) the evolution and evaluation of its characteristic feature the Community Mental Health Team; and (iii) the increasing sophistication of psychosocial interventions developed to support patients. It finishes with an overview of some current challenges.
Collapse
|
30
|
Markström U. Staying the course? Challenges in implementing evidence-based programs in community mental health services. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2014; 11:10752-69. [PMID: 25325359 PMCID: PMC4211004 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph111010752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2014] [Revised: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 10/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
This paper focuses on the second phase of the deinstitutionalisation of mental health care in which the development of community-based interventions are supposed to be implemented in local community mental health care systems. The challenge to sustainable implementation is illustrated by the Swedish case where the government put forward a national training program that sought to introduce Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) for people with severe mental illness. This study is based on document analysis and qualitative interviews with actors at the national, regional, and local levels covering a total of five regions and 15 municipalities that participated in the program. The analysis of the national experiences is put in relation to both research on public administration and policy analysis as well as to current research on implementation of evidence-based programs. The results showed a “drift” of the original model, which had already begun at the policy formulation stage and ended up in a large number of different local arrangements where only a few of the original components of ACT remained. We conclude that issues with implementation can only be fully understood by considering factors at different analytical levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Urban Markström
- Department of Social Work, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tlach L, Wüsten C, Daubmann A, Liebherz S, Härter M, Dirmaier J. Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Health Expect 2014; 18:1856-72. [PMID: 25145796 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessment of users' information and decision-making needs is one key step in the development of decision-support interventions. OBJECTIVE To identify patients' information and decision-making needs as a pre-requisite for the development of high-quality web-based patient decision aids (PtDAs) for common mental disorders. SEARCH STRATEGY A systematic MEDLINE search for papers published until December 2012 was conducted, and reference lists of included articles and relevant reviews were searched. INCLUSION CRITERIA Original studies containing data on information or decision-making needs of adults with depression, anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, alcohol-related disorders and schizophrenia were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data extraction was performed using a standardized form, and data synthesis was conducted using a theory-based deductive approach by two independent reviewers. Studies were quality assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. MAIN RESULTS Twelve studies were included focusing on information needs or the identification of decisions patients with depression and schizophrenia were facing. No studies were found for the other mental disorders. Overall, seven information needs categories were identified with the topics 'basic facts', 'treatment' and 'coping' being of major relevance. Six decision categories were identified of which decisions on 'medication' and 'treatment setting' were most often classified. CONCLUSIONS This review reveals that patients with schizophrenia and depression show extensive information and decision-making needs. The identified needs can initially inform the design of PtDAs for schizophrenia and depression. However, there is an urgent need to investigate information and decision-making needs among patients with other mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Tlach
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Caroline Wüsten
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anne Daubmann
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sarah Liebherz
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Härter
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jörg Dirmaier
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chatterjee S, Naik S, John S, Dabholkar H, Balaji M, Koschorke M, Varghese M, Thara R, Weiss HA, Williams P, McCrone P, Patel V, Thornicroft G. Effectiveness of a community-based intervention for people with schizophrenia and their caregivers in India (COPSI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014; 383:1385-94. [PMID: 24612754 PMCID: PMC4255067 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62629-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational evidence suggests that community-based services for people with schizophrenia can be successfully provided by community health workers, when supervised by specialists, in low-income and middle-income countries. We did the COmmunity care for People with Schizophrenia in India (COPSI) trial to compare the effectiveness of a collaborative community-based care intervention with standard facility-based care. METHODS We did a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial at three sites in India between Jan 1, 2009 and Dec 31, 2010. Patients aged 16-60 years with a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia according to the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic Criteria for Research (ICD-10-DCR) were randomly assigned (2:1), via a computer-generated randomisation list with block sizes of three, six, or nine, to receive either collaborative community-based care plus facility-based care or facility-based care alone. Randomisation was stratified by study site. Outcome assessors were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was a change in symptoms and disabilities over 12 months, as measured by the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) and the Indian disability evaluation and assessment scale (IDEAS). Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN 56877013. FINDINGS 187 participants were randomised to the collaborative community-based care plus facility-based care group and 95 were randomised to the facility-based care alone group; 253 (90%) participants completed follow-up to month 12. At 12 months, total PANSS and IDEAS scores were lower in patients in the intervention group than in those in the control group (PANSS adjusted mean difference -3.75, 95% CI -7.92 to 0.42; p=0.08; IDEAS -0.95, -1.68 to -0.23; p=0.01). However, no difference was shown in the proportion of participants who had a reduction of more than 20% in overall symptoms (PANSS 85 [51%] in the intervention group vs 44 [51%] in the control group; p=0.89; IDEAS 75 [48%] vs 28 [35%]). We noted a significant reduction in symptom and disability outcomes at the rural Tamil Nadu site (-9.29, -15.41 to -3.17; p=0.003). Two patients (one in each group) died by suicide during the study, and two patients died because of complications of a road traffic accident and pre-existing cardiac disease. 18 (73%) patients (17 in the intervention group) were admitted to hospital during the course of the trial, of whom seven were admitted because of physical health problems, such as acute gastritis and vomiting, road accident, high fever, or cardiovascular disease. INTERPRETATION The collaborative community-based care plus facility-based care intervention is modestly more effective than facility-based care, especially for reducing disability and symptoms of psychosis. Our results show that the study intervention is best implemented as an initial service in settings where services are scarce, for example in rural areas. FUNDING Wellcome Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sujit John
- Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, India
| | | | | | - Mirja Koschorke
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Health Service and Population Research Department, London, UK
| | - Mathew Varghese
- Department of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Helen A Weiss
- Medical Research Council Tropical Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Paul Williams
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, London, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, London, UK
| | - Vikram Patel
- Sangath, Goa, India; Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India
| | - Graham Thornicroft
- King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Health Service and Population Research Department, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gaebel W, Muijen M, Baumann A, Bhugra D, Wasserman D, van der Gaag R, Heun R, Zielasek J. EPA Guidance on Building Trust in Mental Health Services. Eur Psychiatry 2014; 29:83-100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2013] [Revised: 01/10/2014] [Accepted: 01/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
AbstractPurposeTo advance mental health care use by developing recommendations to increase trust from the general public and patients, those who have been in contact with services, those who have never been in contact and those who care for their families in the mental health care system.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature search and the retrieved documents were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Evidence tables were generated and recommendations were developed in an expert and stakeholder consensus process.ResultsWe developed five recommendations which may increase trust in mental health care services and advance mental health care service utilization.DiscussionTrust is a mutual, complex, multidimensional and dynamic interrelationship of a multitude of factors. Its components may vary between individuals and over time. They may include, among others, age, place of residence, ethnicity, culture, experiences as a service user, and type of disorder. For mental health care services, issues of knowledge about mental health services, confidentiality, continuity of treatment, dignity, safety and avoidance of stigma and coercion are central elements to increase trust.ConclusionEvidence-based recommendations to increase mutual trust of service users and psychiatrists have been developed and may help to increase mental health care service utilization.
Collapse
|
34
|
Rüther T, Bobes J, De Hert M, Svensson T, Mann K, Batra A, Gorwood P, Möller H. EPA Guidance on Tobacco Dependence and Strategies for Smoking Cessation in People with Mental Illness. Eur Psychiatry 2014; 29:65-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2013.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2011] [Revised: 11/13/2013] [Accepted: 11/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractTobacco dependence is the most common substance use disorder in adults with mental illness. The prevalence rates for tobacco dependence are two to four times higher in these patients than in the general population. Smoking has a strong, negative influence on the life expectancy and quality of life of mental health patients, and remains the leading preventable cause of death in this group. Despite these statistics, in some countries smokers with mental illness are disadvantaged in receiving intervention and support for their tobacco dependence, which is often overlooked or even tolerated. This statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) systematically reviews the current evidence on tobacco dependence and withdrawal in patients with mental illness and their treatment. It provides seven recommendations for the core components of diagnostics and treatment in this patient group. These recommendations concern: (1) the recording process, (2) the timing of the intervention, (3) counselling specificities, (4) proposed treatments, (5) frequency of contact after stopping, (6) follow-up visits and (7) relapse prevention. They aim to help clinicians improve the care, health and well-being of patients suffering from mental illness.
Collapse
|
35
|
Veerbeek M, Oude Voshaar R, Depla M, Pot AM. Mental health care Monitor Older adults (MEMO): monitoring patient characteristics and outcome in Dutch mental health services for older adults. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2013; 22:100-9. [PMID: 23682035 PMCID: PMC6878432 DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Information on which older adults attend mental health care and whether they profit from the care they receive is important for policy-makers. To assess this information in daily practice, the "Mental health care Monitor Older adults" (MEMO) was developed in the Netherlands. The aim of this paper is to describe MEMO and the older adults who attend outpatient mental health care regarding their predisposing and enabling characteristics and need for care. In MEMO all patients referred to the division of old age psychiatry of the participating mental health care organisations are assessed at baseline and monitored at 4, 8 and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes are mental and social functioning, consumer satisfaction, and type of treatment provided (MEMO Basic). Over the years, MEMO Basic is repeated. In each cycle, additional information on specific patient groups is added (e.g. mood disorders). Data collection is supported by a web-based system for clinicians, including direct feedback to monitor patients throughout treatment. First results at baseline showed that the majority of patients that entered the division of old age psychiatry was female (69%), had low education (83%), lived alone (53%), was depressed (42%) and had a comorbid condition (82%). It seemed that older immigrants were not sufficiently reached. The current study is the first in the Netherlands to evaluate patient characteristics and outcome in mental health care provided for older adults in day-to-day practice. If MEMO works out successfully, the method should be extended to other target groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein Veerbeek
- Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
[Team-based community psychiatry: importance of context factors and transferability of evidence from studies]. DER NERVENARZT 2012; 83:825-31. [PMID: 22688090 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-011-3468-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
The German Society for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Neurology (DGPPN) guidelines on psychosocial interventions for people with severe mental illness appraise the transferability of results of trials evaluating community-based mental health services to the German situation. This assessment has to draw on research results on factors determining effectiveness. This must be seen against the background of a lack of high-quality trials in Germany. The article discusses system, context and setting factors related to the transfer of evidence on community-based service models from other countries. These issues are discussed on the basis of evidence concerning the models of case management, assertive community treatment and community mental health teams. International differences in study findings are highlighted and the importance of treatment-as-usual in influencing study results is emphasized. The more control services including elements of community-based care there are and the less the pressure to reduce inpatient treatment (threshold to inpatient care admission), the smaller the relative effect sizes of innovative care models will be.In the absence of direct evidence, careful examination of transferability is required before introducing health care models. Research has revealed solid evidence for several factors influencing the effects of innovative community mental health care. Among key factors in the care of people with severe mental illness, home visits and joint team responsibility for both psychiatric and social care were identified. This evidence can facilitate the adaptation of successful mental health care models in Germany.
Collapse
|
38
|
Lipina TV, Roder JC. Co-learning facilitates memory in mice: a new avenue in social neuroscience. Neuropharmacology 2012; 64:283-93. [PMID: 22776545 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2012] [Revised: 06/08/2012] [Accepted: 06/27/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Social context affects brain function but our understanding of its neurobiology is at an early stage. The mere presence of one individual can alter the cognitive capacities of another and social learning has been demonstrated in many species, including the mouse. We asked several questions: 1. How can active engagement of two familiar mice in the same learning activity (co-learning) alter their memory? 2. Under which environmental conditions (aversive vs non-aversive) can we expect the memory to be enhanced, impaired, or not affected? 3. Can a genetic factor modify the co-learning effect on memory? More specifically, can co-learning correct memory deficits in autistic-like BTBR inbred mice with deficient sociability? We demonstrated that pairs of familiar inbred mice of the same or different genotypes (C57BL/6J and BTBR) that were habituated to new objects and their spatial location, had enhanced episodic memory in the spatial object recognition test, whereas individually-trained animals failed to solve this task. Notably, the co-learning effect was genotype-dependent. BTBR mice paired with BTBR cage-mates in the habituation session modestly ameliorated their performance in the object recognition test but co-learning with a familiar C57BL/6J mouse completely normalized episodic memory deficit. Next, we explored the co-learning effect on fear memory in these inbred strains. Interestingly, mice of both genotypes displayed significantly enhanced contextual fear memory once they had been conditioned together with BTBR animals. The same influence of BTBR presence was observed on cued fear memory in C57BL/6J mice, whereas a modest co-learning effect was found on cued fear conditioning in the BTBR strain. Taken together, we demonstrated for the first time the co-learning effect on cognitive capacities in mice, which can be modified by genetic background and environmental conditions. The possible implications of this methodological approach in social neuroscience are discussed. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Cognitive Enhancers'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana V Lipina
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Ave., Room 860, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|