1
|
Biran A, Bolnykh I, Rimmer B, Cunliffe A, Durrant L, Hancock J, Ludlow H, Pedley I, Rees C, Sharp L. A Systematic Review of Population-Based Studies of Chronic Bowel Symptoms in Cancer Survivors following Pelvic Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4037. [PMID: 37627064 PMCID: PMC10452492 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Pelvic radiotherapy can damage surrounding tissue and organs, causing chronic conditions including bowel symptoms. We systematically identified quantitative, population-based studies of patient-reported bowel symptoms following pelvic radiotherapy to synthesize evidence of symptom type, prevalence, and severity. Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsychINFO were searched from inception to September 2022. Following independent screening of titles, abstracts, and full-texts, population and study characteristics and symptom findings were extracted, and narrative synthesis was conducted. In total, 45 papers (prostate, n = 39; gynecological, n = 6) reporting 19 datasets were included. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous. Most frequently assessed was bowel function ('score', 26 papers, 'bother', 19 papers). Also assessed was urgency, diarrhea, bleeding, incontinence, abdominal pain, painful hemorrhoids, rectal wetness, constipation, mucous discharge, frequency, and gas. Prevalence ranged from 1% (bleeding) to 59% (anal bleeding for >12 months at any time since start of treatment). In total, 10 papers compared radiotherapy with non-cancer comparators and 24 with non-radiotherapy cancer patient groups. Symptom prevalence/severity was greater/worse in radiotherapy groups and symptoms more common/worse post-radiotherapy than pre-diagnosis/treatment. Symptom prevalence varied between studies and symptoms. This review confirms that many people experience chronic bowel symptoms following pelvic radiotherapy. Greater methodological consistency, and investigation of less-well-studied survivor populations, could better inform the provision of services and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Biran
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Iakov Bolnykh
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Ben Rimmer
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Anthony Cunliffe
- NHS Southwest London Clinical Commissioning Group, London SW19 1RH, UK;
| | - Lisa Durrant
- Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton TA1 5DA, UK;
| | - John Hancock
- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Hartlepool TS24 9AH, UK;
| | - Helen Ludlow
- Llandough, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff CF64 2XX, UK;
| | - Ian Pedley
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE3 3HD, UK;
| | - Colin Rees
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| | - Linda Sharp
- Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK; (I.B.); (B.R.); (C.R.); (L.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Koelker M, Labban M, Frego N, Meyer CP, Salomon G, Lipsitz SR, Withington J, Moore CM, Tempany CM, Tuncali K, George A, Kibel AS, Trinh QD, Cole AP. Contemporary patterns of local ablative therapies for prostate cancer at United States cancer centers: results from a national registry. World J Urol 2023; 41:1309-1315. [PMID: 36930254 PMCID: PMC10506077 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04354-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the national-level patterns of care for local ablative therapy among men with PCa and identify patient- and hospital-level factors associated with the receipt of these techniques. METHODS We retrospectively interrogated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for men with clinically localized PCa between 2010 and 2017. The main outcome was receipt of local tumor ablation with either cryo- or laser-ablation, and "other method of local tumor destruction including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)". Patient level, hospital level, and demographic variables were collected. Mixed effect logistic regression models were fitted to identify separately patient- and hospital-level predictors of receipt of local ablative therapy. RESULTS Overall, 11,278 patients received ablative therapy, of whom 78.8% had cryotherapy, 15.6% had laser, and 5.7% had another method including HIFU. At the patient level, men with intermediate-risk PCa were more likely to be treated with local ablative therapy (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.11; p = 0.05), as were men with Charlson Comorbidity Index > 1 (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.29-1.43; p < 0.01), men between 71 and 80 years (OR 3.70; 95% CI 3.43-3.99; p < 0.01), men with Medicare insurance (OR 1.38; 95% 1.31-1.46; p < 0.01), and an income < $47,999 (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.06-1.21; p < 0.01). At the hospital-level, local ablative therapy was less likely to be performed in academic/research facilities (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.32-0.64; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Local ablative therapy for PCa treatment is more commonly offered among older and comorbid patients. Future studies should investigate the uptake of these technologies in non-hospital-based settings and in light of recent changes in insurance coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Koelker
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Muhieddine Labban
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Nicola Frego
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Christian P Meyer
- Department of Urology, Ruhr University Bochum, Klinikum Herford, Herford, Germany
| | - Georg Salomon
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - John Withington
- Division of Surgical and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgical and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals Trust, London, UK
| | - Clare M Tempany
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kemal Tuncali
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arvin George
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center of Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 45 Francis St, ASB II-3, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Palma-Zamora I, Abdollah F, Rogers C, Jeong W. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Advancements in surgical technique and perioperative care. Front Surg 2022; 9:944561. [PMID: 36238861 PMCID: PMC9551271 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.944561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
We reviewed the evolving strategies, practice patterns, and recent advancements aimed at improving the perioperative and surgical outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for the management of localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
4
|
The Challenges of Patient Selection for Prostate Cancer Focal Therapy: A Retrospective Observational Multicentre Study. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:6826-6833. [PMID: 36290815 PMCID: PMC9600719 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29100538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Increased diagnoses of silent prostate cancer (PCa) have led to overtreatment and consequent functional side effects. Focal therapy (FT) applies energy to a prostatic index lesion treating only the clinically significant PCa focus. We analysed the potential predictive factors of FT failure. We collected data from patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in two high-volume hospitals from January 2017 to January 2020. The inclusion criteria were: one MRI-detected lesion with a Gleason Score (GS) of ≤7, ≤cT2a, PSA of ≤10 ng/mL, and GS 6 on a random biopsy with ≤2 positive foci out of 12. Potential oncological safety of FT was defined as the respect of clinicopathological inclusion criteria on histology specimens, no extracapsular extension, and no biochemical, local, or metastatic recurrence within 12 months. To predict FT failure, we performed uni- and multivariate logistic regression. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. The MRI index lesion median size was 11 mm; target lesions were ISUP grade 1 in 27 patients and ISUP grade 2 in 40. Potential FT failure occurred in 32 patients, and only the PSA value resulted as a predictive parameter (p < 0.05). The main issue for FT is patient selection, mainly because of multifocal csPCa foci. Nevertheless, FT could represent a therapeutic alternative for highly selected low-risk PCa patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sibert NT, Pfaff H, Breidenbach C, Wesselmann S, Roth R, Feick G, Carl G, Dieng S, Gaber AA, Blana A, Darr C, Distler F, Kunath F, Bedke J, Erdmann J, Minner J, Simon J, Kwiatkowski M, Burchardt M, Harz N, Conrad S, Höfner T, Knoll T, Beyer B, Hammerer P, Kowalski C. Variation across operating sites in urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy in localized and locally advanced prostate cancer. World J Urol 2022; 40:1437-1446. [PMID: 35347412 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03985-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The extent of variation in urinary and sexual functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RPE) between prostate cancer (PC) operating sites remains unknown. Therefore, this analysis aims to compare casemix-adjusted functional outcomes (EPIC-26 scores incontinence, irritative/obstructive function and sexual function) between operating sites 12 months after RPE. MATERIALS AND METHODS Analysis of a cohort of 7065 men treated with RPE at 88 operating sites (prostate cancer centers, "PCCs") between 2016 and 2019. Patients completed EPIC-26 and sociodemographic information surveys at baseline and 12 months after RPE. Survey data were linked to clinical data. EPIC-26 domain scores at 12 months after RPE were adjusted for relevant confounders (including baseline domain score, clinical and sociodemographic information) using regression analysis. Differences between sites were described using minimal important differences (MIDs) and interquartile ranges (IQR). The effects of casemix adjustment on the score results were described using Cohen's d and MIDs. RESULTS Adjusted domain scores at 12 months varied between sites, with IQRs of 66-78 (incontinence), 89-92 (irritative/obstructive function), and 20-29 (sexual function). Changes in domain scores after casemix adjustment for sites ≥ 1 MID were noted for the incontinence domain (six sites). Cohen's d ranged between - 0.07 (incontinence) and - 0.2 (sexual function), indicating a small to medium effect of casemix adjustment. CONCLUSIONS Variation between sites was greatest in the incontinence and sexual function domains for RPE patients. Future research will need to identify the factors contributing to this variation. TRIAL REGISTRY The study is registered at the German Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.drks.de/drks_web/ ) with the following ID: DRKS00010774.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Tabea Sibert
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Holger Pfaff
- Faculty of Human Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, University of Cologne, Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Cologne, Germany
| | - Clara Breidenbach
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simone Wesselmann
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Roth
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Robert-Koch-Str. 10, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Günther Feick
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Bonn, Germany
| | - Günter Carl
- Federal Association of German Prostate Cancer Patient Support Groups, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Amr A Gaber
- Urologische Klinik, Carl-Thiem-Klinikum Cottbus, Thiemstr. 111, 03048, Cottbus, Germany
| | - Andreas Blana
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Klinikum Fürth, Jakob-Henle-Strasse 1, 90766, Fürth, Germany
| | - Christopher Darr
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Distler
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinik der Paracelsus Medizinischen Privatuniversität, Standort Klinikum Nürnberg, Prof.-Ernst-Nathan-Straße 1 (Haus 22), 90419, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Frank Kunath
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jens Bedke
- Klinik für Urologie, Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Erdmann
- Prostatakarzinomzentrum Tauber-Franken, Uhlandstr. 7, 97980, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Jörg Minner
- Hegau-Bodensee-Klinikum GmbH, Virchowstraße 10, 78224, Singen, Germany
| | - Jörg Simon
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Ortenau Klinikum, Ebertplatz 12, 77654, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Maciej Kwiatkowski
- Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Onkologiezentrum Mittelland, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Martin Burchardt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Ferdinand-Sauerbruch-Straße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Nino Harz
- Klinikum Dortmund, Münsterstraße 240, 44145, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Stefan Conrad
- DIAKOVERE Friederikenstift, Humboldtstraße 5, 30169, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Höfner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany
| | - Thomas Knoll
- Kliniken Sindelfingen, Arthur-Gruber-Str. 70, 71065, Sindelfingen, Germany
| | - Burkhard Beyer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Hammerer
- Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig, Freisestraße 9/10, 38118, Braunschweig, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koo K, Papa N, Evans M, Jefford M, IJzerman M, White V, Evans SM, Ristevski E, Emery J, Millar J. Mapping disadvantage: identifying inequities in functional outcomes for prostate cancer survivors based on geography. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:283. [PMID: 35296282 PMCID: PMC8928643 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09389-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer is the most common internal malignancy in Australian men, and although most patients have good survival outcomes, treatment toxicities can impair function, leading to diminished quality of life for prostate cancer survivors. Socioeconomic disadvantage and geographical remoteness have been shown to be related to worse oncologic outcomes, and it is expected that they would similarly influence functional outcomes in prostate cancer. Methods Using data from the Victorian Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry (n = 10,924), we investigated functional outcomes as measured by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) following prostate cancer treatment, focusing on associations with socioeconomic status and geographical remoteness and controlling for clinicopathologic characteristics. A single composite score was developed from the five separate EPIC-26 domains for use in geo-mapping. Results A total of 7690 patients had complete EPIC-26 data, allowing mapping hotspots of poor function using our composite score. These hotspots were observed to relate to areas of socioeconomic disadvantage. Significant heterogeneity in outcomes was seen in urban areas, with hotspots of good and poor function. Both socioeconomic disadvantage and geographical remoteness were found to predict for worse functional outcomes, although only the former is significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusions Geo-mapping of functional outcomes in prostate cancer has the potential to guide health care service provision and planning. A nuanced policy approach is required so as not to miss disadvantaged patients who live in urban areas. We have demonstrated the potential of geo-mapping to visualise population-level outcomes, potentially allowing targeted interventions to address inequities in quality of care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09389-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendrick Koo
- Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia. .,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. .,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Nathan Papa
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melanie Evans
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maarten IJzerman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, Cancer Health Services Research, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Victoria White
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.,Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sue M Evans
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eli Ristevski
- Monash Rural Health - Warragul, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Centre for Cancer Research, Cancer Health Services Research, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Polter EJ, Kohli N, Rosser BS, Talley KM, Wheldon CW, Hoefer CJ, Wright M, Haggart R, Mitteldorf D, Kilian G, Konety BR, Ross MW, West W. Creation and Psychometric Validation of the Sexual Minorities and Prostate Cancer Scale (SMACS) in Sexual Minority Patients-The Restore-2 Study. J Sex Med 2022; 19:529-540. [PMID: 35131199 PMCID: PMC8893317 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing measures of sexual functioning in prostate cancer survivors focus primarily on erectile function and do not adequately measure the experiences of sexual minority men. AIM To develop and psychometrically evaluate a new scale to measure sexual functioning among sexual minority men with prostate cancer. METHODS Sexual minority prostate cancer patients (n = 401) completed an online battery of urinary and sexual functioning tests in 2019, including a new 37-item instrument about their sexual functioning post-treatment for prostate cancer. OUTCOMES We used confirmatory factor analysis to determine the construct validity of a new scale including five subscales: a four-factor model for all participants (n = 401) evaluated Sexual Satisfaction, Sexual Confidence, Frequency of Sexual Problems, and Urinary Incontinence in Sex. A single-factor model completed only by participants who had attempted or desired receptive anal sex (n = 255) was evaluated in the fifth subscale: Problematic Receptive Anal Sex. To evaluate criterion validity, we calculated the intercorrelations between each Sexual Minorities and Prostate Cancer Scale (SMACS) subscale and four related scales: the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-50 (EPIC), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate, the Brief Symptom Inventory-18, and the International Consultation on incontinence questionnaire. Cronbach's alphas were calculated to measure internal consistency (ie, reliability). RESULTS Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.64 to 0.89. Loadings (0.479-0.926) and model fit indices were strong (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: 0.085, Standardized root mean squared residual: 0.063, comparative fit index: 0.927, Tucker-Lewis Index: 0.907). For criterion validity, Sexual Satisfaction, Sexual Confidence, and Frequency of Sexual Problems were moderately correlated with EPIC function and bother scores (r = 0.50-0.72) and Urinary incontinence in sex correlated moderately with EPIC Urinary Function and International Consultation on incontinence questionnaire scores (0.45-0.56). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The SMACS can be used by clinicians and researchers to comprehensively measure sexual functioning in sexual minority men, in conjunction with existing scales. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS This new scale is validated in a large, geographically diverse cohort of sexual minority cancer survivors and fills an important gap in existing measures of sexual functioning. Limitations include a lack of a validation sample. CONCLUSION The SMACS is a valid and reliable new scale that measures sexual minority men's experience of urinary incontinence in sex, problematic receptive anal sex, and sexual distress. Polter EJ, Kohli N, Rosser BRS, et al. Creation and Psychometric Validation of the Sexual Minorities and Prostate Cancer Scale (SMACS) in Sexual Minority Patients-The Restore-2 Study. J Sex Med 2022;19:529-540.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth J. Polter
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nidhi Kohli
- Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - B.R. Simon Rosser
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kristine M.C. Talley
- Adult and Gerontological Health Cooperative, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Christopher W. Wheldon
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Chris J. Hoefer
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Morgan Wright
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ryan Haggart
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Gudrun Kilian
- Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Michael W. Ross
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - William West
- Department of Writing Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Very Challenging Disease in the Field of Uro-Oncology. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11030400. [PMID: 33652852 PMCID: PMC7996958 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11030400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in males and affects 16% of men during their lifetime [...].
Collapse
|
9
|
Koontz BF, Hoffman KE, Halabi S, Healy P, Anand M, George DJ, Harrison MR, Zhang T, Berry WR, Corn PG, Lee WR, Armstrong AJ. Combination of Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen Blockade With Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone for Men With High- and Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1271-1278. [PMID: 33259932 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Long-term androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard of care in combination with radiation therapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC), despite substantial toxicity from the resulting hypogonadism. We hypothesized that a combination of more potent but shorter-term androgen inhibition in men with intermediate- or high-risk localized PC would synergize with definitive RT to provide short-term testosterone recovery and improve disease control. METHODS AND MATERIALS This prospective phase 2 single-arm trial enrolled men with low-volume unfavorable intermediate or high-risk localized PC. Treatment included 6 months of ADT concurrent with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) once daily and RT to prostate and seminal vesicles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of men with an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at 12-months; secondary objectives included biochemical progression-free survival (PFS), testosterone recovery, toxicity, and sexual and hormonal quality of life. RESULTS We enrolled 37 men between January 2014 and August 2016, 45% of whom were high risk. All patients had T1-2 disease and PSA < 20 ng/mL. Median follow-up is 37 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.7-39.1). Treatment noted 32% grade 3 toxicities related to AAP, predominantly hypertension, with no toxicities ≥G4. The rate of undetectable PSA at 12 months was 55% (95% CI, 36%-72%). With 46 months of median follow-up, 2 of 37 patients developed PSA progression (36-month PFS = 96%; 95% CI, 76%-99%), and 81% of patients recovered testosterone with a median time to recovery of 9.2 months. Hormonal or sexual function declined at 6 months with subsequent improvement by 24 months. CONCLUSIONS The combination of RT and 6 months of ADT and AAP demonstrated acceptable toxicity and a high rate of testosterone recovery with restoration of quality of life and excellent disease control in men with low-volume, intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer. Prospective comparative studies are justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget F Koontz
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
| | - Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan Halabi
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Patrick Healy
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Monika Anand
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Daniel J George
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Michael R Harrison
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Tian Zhang
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - William R Berry
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paul G Corn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - W Robert Lee
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Andrew J Armstrong
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ramsey SD, Hall IJ, Smith JL, Ekwueme DU, Fedorenko CR, Kreizenbeck K, Bansal A, Thompson IM, Penson DF. A comparison of general, genitourinary, bowel, and sexual quality of life among long term survivors of prostate, bladder, colorectal, and lung cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 12:305-311. [PMID: 32739353 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Studies of local stage prostate cancer survivors suggest that treatments carry risk of persistent impotence, incontinence, and bowel dysfunction. To examine impacts of cancer type and side effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in long-term cancer survivorship, we evaluated 5-year follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and compared results with a matched group of male long-term survivors of other local-stage cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS We examined genitourinary, bowel and sexual symptoms, and general quality of life. Matched survivors of colorectal, lung, and bladder cancers were recruited via registries in 3 different regions in the United States. Patients were surveyed 3-5 years after diagnosis with the SF-12 and EPIC to evaluate general mental and physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patient function and bother. RESULTS We analyzed responses from long-term prostate (n = 77) and bladder, colorectal, and lung cancer (n = 124) patients. In multivariate analysis, long-term local stage prostate cancer survivors had significantly higher SF-12 physical component scores but did not differ from long-term survivors of other cancers in terms of their SF-12 mental summary scores. Prostate survivors had similar mental, urinary, bowel, and sexual HRQoL compared to long-term survivors of other local stage cancers. CONCLUSION Long-term general and prostate-specific HRQoL was similar between local stage prostate and bladder, colorectal, and lung patients with cancer. Future research focusing on factors other than initial treatment and the cancer type per se may provide more meaningful information regarding factors that predict disparities on HRQoL among longer-term survivors of early stage male cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D Ramsey
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MS: M3-B232, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.
| | - Ingrid J Hall
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, MS F76, Chamblee, GA 30341, USA.
| | - Judith Lee Smith
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, MS F76, Chamblee, GA 30341, USA.
| | - Donatus U Ekwueme
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, MS F76, Chamblee, GA 30341, USA.
| | - Catherine R Fedorenko
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MS: M3-B232, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.
| | - Karma Kreizenbeck
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MS: M3-B232, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.
| | - Aasthaa Bansal
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., MS: M3-B232, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA; University of Washington, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Box 357630, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| | - Ian M Thompson
- University of Texas Health Science Center, 7979 Wurzbach Rd, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; Christus Santa Rosa Hospital and Medical Center, 2827 Babcock Rd, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology and Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vernooij RWM, Cremers RGHM, Jansen H, Somford DM, Kiemeney LA, van Andel G, Wijsman BP, Busstra MB, van Moorselaar RJA, Wijnen EM, Pos FJ, Hulshof MCCM, Hamberg P, van den Berkmortel F, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, van Leenders GJLH, Fütterer JJ, van Oort IM, Aben KKH. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer: A nationwide observational study. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:735.e17-735.e25. [PMID: 32680820 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although urinary adverse events after treatment of prostate cancer (CaP) are common, population-based studies on functional outcomes are scarce. The aim of this study is to evaluate the occurrence of urinary incontinence (UI) and erectile dysfunction (ED) in daily clinical practice using a nationwide Dutch cohort of patients with localized or locally advanced CaP. BASIC PROCEDURES Patients were invited to complete the EPIC-26 questionnaire before treatment (baseline) and at 12 and 24 months after diagnosis. We calculated the mean EPIC-26 domain scores, stratified by treatment modality (i.e., radical prostatectomy, external radiotherapy, and no active treatment), and the proportions of patients with UI (defined as ≥ 2 pads per day) and ED (defined as erections not firm enough for sexual intercourse). Logistic regression modeling was used to explore the factors related to UI and ED after surgery. MAIN FINDINGS In total 1,759 patients participated in this study. Patients undergoing radical prostatectomy experienced clinically relevant worsening in the urinary incontinence domain. After excluding patients who reported UI at baseline, 15% of patients with prostatectomy reported UI 24 months after diagnosis. Only comorbidity was associated with UI in surgically treated patients. Regardless of treatment, patients reported a clinically significant reduced sexual functioning over time. Before treatment, 54% of patients reported ED. Among the 46% remaining patients, 87% of patients treated with radical prostatectomy reported ED 24 months after diagnosis, 41% after radiotherapy, and 46% in patients without active treatment. Bilateral nerve-sparing surgery was the only factor associated with ED after 24 months. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS UI and ED frequently occur in patients with localized and locally advanced CaP, in particular after radical prostatectomy. The higher occurrence rate of UI and ED, compared with clinical trial participants, supports the importance of real-world data, which can be used for local treatment recommendations and patient information, but also to evaluate effects of future initiatives, such as treatment centralization and research aimed at improving functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R W M Vernooij
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R G H M Cremers
- Department of Urology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - H Jansen
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - D M Somford
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - L A Kiemeney
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Urology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - G van Andel
- Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B P Wijsman
- Department of Urology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - M B Busstra
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J A van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E M Wijnen
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - F J Pos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Hamberg
- Department of Oncology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F van den Berkmortel
- Department of Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands
| | | | - G J L H van Leenders
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J J Fütterer
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - I M van Oort
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Urology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - K K H Aben
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tourinho-Barbosa RR, Wood BJ, Abreu AL, Nahar B, Shin T, Guven S, Polascik TJ. Current state of image-guided focal therapy for prostate cancer. World J Urol 2020; 39:701-717. [PMID: 32444886 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03254-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the current evidence regarding protocols and outcomes of image-guided focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A literature search of the latest published studies assessing primary FT for PCa was carried out in Medline and Cochrane library databases followed by a critical review. FT modalities, follow-up strategies, and oncological and toxicity outcomes were summarized and discussed in this review. RESULTS Twenty-four studies with six different sources of energy met the inclusion criteria. A heterogeneity of patient selection, energy sources, treatment templates, and definitions of failure was found among the studies. While a third of patients may be found to have additional cancer burden over 3-5 years following FT, most patients will remain free of a radical procedure. The vast majority of patients maintain urinary continence and good erectile function after FT. Acute urinary retention is the most common complication, whilst severe complications remain rare. CONCLUSION An increasing number of prospective studies with longer follow-up have been recently published. Acceptable cancer control and low treatment toxicity after FT have been consistently reported. Follow-up imaging and routine biopsy must be encouraged post-FT. While there is no reliable PSA threshold to predict failure after FT, reporting post-FT positive biopsies and retreatment rates appear to be standard when assessing treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael R Tourinho-Barbosa
- Department of Urology, Hospital CardioPulmonar, 157, Ponciano Oliveira Street, Salvador, Bahia, 40170-530, Brazil.
- Department of Urology, Faculdade de Medicina Do ABC (ABC Medical School), São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Bradford J Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Interventional Radiology, Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Andre Luis Abreu
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bruno Nahar
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Toshitaka Shin
- Department of Urology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Selcuk Guven
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Thomas J Polascik
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moris L, Cumberbatch MG, Van den Broeck T, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Kelly B, Pal R, Briers E, Cornford P, De Santis M, Fanti S, Gillessen S, Grummet JP, Henry AM, Lam TBL, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Omar MI, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, van den Bergh RCN, van Der Kwast TH, van Der Poel HG, Willemse PPM, Yuan CY, Konety B, Dorff T, Jain S, Mottet N, Wiegel T. Benefits and Risks of Primary Treatments for High-risk Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2020; 77:614-627. [PMID: 32146018 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.01.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The optimal treatment for men with high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of the existing literature on the effectiveness of the different primary treatment modalities for high-risk localized and locally advanced PCa. The primary oncological outcome is the development of distant metastases at ≥5 yr of follow-up. Secondary oncological outcomes are PCa-specific mortality, overall mortality, biochemical recurrence, and need for salvage treatment with ≥5 yr of follow-up. Nononcological outcomes are quality of life (QoL), functional outcomes, and treatment-related side effects reported. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Medline, Medline In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials were searched. All comparative (randomized and nonrandomized) studies published between January 2000 and May 2019 with at least 50 participants in each arm were included. Studies reporting on high-risk localized PCa (International Society of Urologic Pathologists [ISUP] grade 4-5 [Gleason score {GS} 8-10] or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >20 ng/ml or ≥ cT2c) and/or locally advanced PCa (any PSA, cT3-4 or cN+, any ISUP grade/GS) or where subanalyses were performed on either group were included. The following primary local treatments were mandated: radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (≥64 Gy), brachytherapy (BT), or multimodality treatment combining any of the local treatments above (±any systemic treatment). Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding factors were assessed for each study. A narrative synthesis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 90 studies met the inclusion criteria. RoB and confounding factors revealed high RoB for selection, performance, and detection bias, and low RoB for correction of initial PSA and biopsy GS. When comparing RP with EBRT, retrospective series suggested an advantage for RP, although with a low level of evidence. Both RT and RP should be seen as part of a multimodal treatment plan with possible addition of (postoperative) RT and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), respectively. High levels of evidence exist for EBRT treatment, with several randomized clinical trials showing superior outcome for adding long-term ADT or BT to EBRT. No clear cutoff can be proposed for RT dose, but higher RT doses by means of dose escalation schemes result in an improved biochemical control. Twenty studies reported data on QoL, with RP resulting mainly in genitourinary toxicity and sexual dysfunction, and EBRT in bowel problems. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of this systematic review, both RP as part of multimodal treatment and EBRT + long-term ADT can be recommended as primary treatment in high-risk and locally advanced PCa. For high-risk PCa, EBRT + BT can also be offered despite more grade 3 toxicity. Interestingly, for selected patients, for example, those with higher comorbidity, a shorter duration of ADT might be an option. For locally advanced PCa, EBRT + BT shows promising result but still needs further validation. In this setting, it is important that patients are aware that the offered therapy will most likely be in the context a multimodality treatment plan. In particular, if radiation is used, the combination of local with systemic treatment provides the best outcome, provided the patient is fit enough to receive both. Until the results of the SPCG15 trial are known, the optimal local treatment remains a matter of debate. Patients should at all times be fully informed about all available options, and the likelihood of a multimodal approach including the potential side effects of both local and systemic treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature to see whether the evidence from clinical studies would tell us the best way of curing men with aggressive prostate cancer that had not spread to other parts of the body such as lymph glands or bones. Based on the results of this systematic review, there is good evidence that both surgery and radiation therapy are good treatment options, in terms of prolonging life and preserving quality of life, provided they are combined with other treatments. In the case of surgery this means including radiotherapy (RT), and in the case of RT this means either hormonal therapy or combined RT and brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | | | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Brian Kelly
- Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Raj Pal
- Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Philip Cornford
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie, Manchester, UK
| | - Jeremy P Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Thomas B L Lam
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK; Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm D Mason
- Division of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Lyon 1, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Henk G van Der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center, Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cathy Y Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Health Science Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Tanya Dorff
- Department of Medical Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC) Keck School of Medicine and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCCC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Suneil Jain
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK; Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barocas DA, Penson DF. Functional Recovery Following Primary Treatment for Prostate Cancer: Update from the CEASAR Study. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 6:205-207. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
15
|
Wang Z, Ni Y, Chen J, Sun G, Zhang X, Zhao J, Zhu X, Zhang H, Zhu S, Dai J, Shen P, Zeng H. The efficacy and safety of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:42. [PMID: 32093688 PMCID: PMC7041271 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01824-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) remains a debate and selection of patients to receive proper therapy is still an unsettled question. This systematic review was conducted to compare the effectiveness of prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with high-risk PCa and to select candidates for optimal treatment. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible studies. We extracted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of all included studies. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS); the secondary outcomes were biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and clinical recurrence-free survival (CRFS). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to Gleason score (GS), T stage and RT types. Quality of life (QoL) was compared with these two treatments. Results A total of 25 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, RP showed more survival benefits than RT on CSS (P = 0.003) and OS (P = 0.002); while RT was associated with better BRFS (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses showed RT was associated with similar or even better survival outcomes compared to RP in patients with high GS, high T stage or received external beam radiotherapy plus brachytherapy (EBRT + BT). As for QoL, RP was associated with poorer urinary and sexual function but better performance in the bowel domain. Conclusion RP could prolong the survival time of patients with high-risk PCa; however, RT could delay the disease progression, and combined RT (EBRT + BT) even brought preferable CSS and similar OS compared to RP. RT might be the prior choice for patients with high T stage or high GS. RP could lead to poorer urinary and sexual function, while bringing better performance in the bowel domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhipeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yuchao Ni
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Junru Chen
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Guangxi Sun
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xingming Zhang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Jinge Zhao
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xudong Zhu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Haoran Zhang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Sha Zhu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Jindong Dai
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Pengfei Shen
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Hao Zeng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Laviana AA, Zhao Z, Huang LC, Koyama T, Conwill R, Hoffman K, Goodman M, Hamilton AS, Wu XC, Paddock LE, Stroup A, Cooperberg MR, Hashibe M, O'Neil BB, Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Penson DF, Barocas DA. Development and Internal Validation of a Web-based Tool to Predict Sexual, Urinary, and Bowel Function Longitudinally After Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation. Eur Urol 2020; 78:248-255. [PMID: 32098731 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making to guide treatment of localized prostate cancer requires delivery of the anticipated quality of life (QOL) outcomes of contemporary treatment options (including radical prostatectomy [RP], intensity-modulated radiation therapy [RT], and active surveillance [AS]). Predicting these QOL outcomes based on personalized features is necessary. OBJECTIVE To create an easy-to-use tool to predict personalized sexual, urinary, bowel, and hormonal function outcomes after RP, RT, and AS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective, population-based cohort study was conducted utilizing US cancer registries of 2563 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer in 2011-2012. INTERVENTION Patient-reported urinary, sexual, and bowel function up to 5 yr after treatment. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Patient-reported urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal function through 5 yr after treatment were collected using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire. Comprehensive models to predict domain scores were fit, which included age, race, D'Amico classification, body mass index, EPIC-26 baseline function, treatment, and standardized scores measuring comorbidity, general QOL, and psychosocial health. We reduced these models by removing the instrument scores and replacing D'Amico classification with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score. For the final model, we performed bootstrap internal validation to assess model calibration from which an easy-to-use web-based tool was developed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The prediction models achieved bias-corrected R-squared values of 0.386, 0.232, 0.183, 0.214, and 0.309 for sexual function, urinary incontinence, urinary irritative, bowel, and hormonal domains, respectively. Differences in R-squared values between the comprehensive and parsimonious models were small in magnitude. Calibration was excellent. The web-based tool is available at https://statez.shinyapps.io/PCDSPred/. CONCLUSIONS Functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer can be predicted at the time of diagnosis based on age, race, PSA, biopsy grade, baseline function, and a general question regarding overall health. Providers and patients can use this prediction tool to inform shared decision making. PATIENT SUMMARY In this report, we studied patient-reported sexual, urinary, hormonal, and bowel function through 5 yr after treatment with radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. We developed a web-based predictive tool that can be used to predict one's outcomes after treatment based on age, race, prostate-specific antigen, biopsy grade, pretreatment baseline function, and a general question regarding overall health. We hope both patients and providers can use this tool to better understand expected outcomes after treatment, further enhancing shared decision making between providers and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron A Laviana
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Zhiguo Zhao
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Li-Ching Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Tatsuki Koyama
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ralph Conwill
- Office of Patient and Community Education, Patient Advocacy Program, Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Karen Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Center, Huston, TX, USA
| | - Michael Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ann S Hamilton
- Department of Preventative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University New Orleans School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Lisa E Paddock
- Department of Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Antoinette Stroup
- Department of Epidemiology, Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Mia Hashibe
- Department of Family and Preventative Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Brock B O'Neil
- Department of Urology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sherrie H Kaplan
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Sheldon Greenfield
- Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lovegrove CE, Peters M, Guillaumier S, Arya M, Afzal N, Dudderidge T, Hosking-Jervis F, Hindley RG, Lewi H, McCartan N, Moore CM, Nigam R, Ogden C, Persad R, Virdi J, Winkler M, Emberton M, Ahmed HU, Shah TT, Minhas S. Evaluation of functional outcomes after a second focal high-intensity focused ultrasonography (HIFU) procedure in men with primary localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer: results from the HIFU Evaluation and Assessment of Treatment (HEAT) registry. BJU Int 2020; 125:853-860. [PMID: 31971335 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess change in functional outcomes after a second focal high-intensity focused ultrasonography (HIFU) treatment compared with outcomes after one focal HIFU treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicentre study (2005-2016), 821 men underwent focal HIFU for localized non-metastatic prostate cancer. The patient-reported outcome measures of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), pad usage and erectile function (EF) score were prospectively collected for up to 3 years. To be included in the study, completion of at least one follow-up questionnaire was required. The primary outcome was comparison of change in functional outcomes between baseline and follow-up after one focal HIFU procedure vs after a second focal HIFU procedure, using IPSS, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaires. RESULTS Of 821 men, 654 underwent one focal HIFU procedure and 167 underwent a second focal HIFU procedure. A total of 355 (54.3%) men undergoing one focal HIFU procedure and 65 (38.9%) with a second focal HIFU procedure returned follow-up questionnaires, respectively. The mean age and prostate-specific antigen level were 66.4 and 65.6 years, and 7.9 and 8.4 ng/mL, respectively. After one focal HIFU treatment, the mean change in IPSS was -0.03 (P = 0.02) and in IIEF (EF score) it was -0.4 (P = 0.02) at 1-2 years, with no subsequent decline. Absolute rates of erectile dysfunction increased from 9.9% to 20.8% (P = 0.08), leak-free continence decreased from 77.9% to 72.8% (P = 0.06) and pad-free continence from 98.6% to 94.8% (P = 0.07) at 1-2 years, respectively. IPSS prior to second focal HIFU treatment compared to baseline IPSS prior to first focal HIFU treatment was lower by -1.3 (P = 0.02), but mean IPSS change was +1.4 at 1-2 years (P = 0.03) and +1.2 at 2-3 years (P = 0.003) after the second focal HIFU treatment. The mean change in EF score after the second focal HIFU treatment was -0.2 at 1-2 years (P = 0.60) and -0.5 at 2-3 years (P = 0.10), with 17.8% and 6.2% of men with new erectile dysfunction. The rate of new pad use was 1.8% at 1-2 years and 2.6% at 2-3 years. CONCLUSION A second focal HIFU procedure causes minor detrimental effects on urinary function and EF. These data can be used to counsel patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer prior to considering HIFU therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine E Lovegrove
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Max Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Guillaumier
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Manit Arya
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Naveed Afzal
- Department of Urology, Dorset County Hospital NHS Trust, Dorset, UK
| | - Tim Dudderidge
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Feargus Hosking-Jervis
- Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard G Hindley
- Department of Urology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | | | - Neil McCartan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Caroline M Moore
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raj Nigam
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK.,Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Chris Ogden
- Department of Academic Urology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Raj Persad
- Department of Urology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Jaspal Virdi
- Department of Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust, Harlow, UK
| | - Mathias Winkler
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mark Emberton
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hashim U Ahmed
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Taimur T Shah
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Suks Minhas
- Imperial Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.,Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Greenberger BA, Chen VE, Den RB. Combined Modality Therapies for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Narrative Review of Current Understanding and New Directions. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1273. [PMID: 31850194 PMCID: PMC6896415 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the many prospective randomized trials that have been available in the past decade regarding the optimization of radiation, hormonal, and surgical therapies for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), many questions remain. There is currently a lack of level I evidence regarding the relative efficacy of radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by adjuvant radiation compared to radiation therapy (RT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for high-risk PCa. Current retrospective series have also described an improvement in biochemical outcomes and PCa-specific mortality through the use of augmented radiation strategies incorporating brachytherapy. The relative efficacy of modern augmented RT compared to RP is still incompletely understood. We present a narrative review regarding recent advances in understanding regarding comparisons of overall and PCa-specific mortality measures among patients with high-risk PCa treated with either an RP/adjuvant RT or an RT/ADT approach. We give special consideration to recent trends toward the assembly of multi-institutional series targeted at providing high-quality data to minimize the effects of residual confounding. We also provide a narrative review of recent studies examining brachytherapy boost and systemic therapies, as well as an overview of currently planned and ongoing studies that will further elucidate strategies for treatment optimization over the next decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Victor E Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Robert B Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College and Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sexual function outcomes following interventions for prostate cancer: are contemporary reports on functional outcomes misleading? Int J Impot Res 2019; 32:495-502. [PMID: 31836862 DOI: 10.1038/s41443-019-0220-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Patients with primary localised prostate cancer (PCa) have a wide choice of curative therapeutic interventions, including active surveillance, surgical, focal and radiation therapies. Based on clinical and oncological characteristics, treatment decisions entail consideration of oncological and functional outcomes with important effects on quality of life. We aimed to highlight evidence surrounding present inconsistencies, the problems this presents to clinicians and patients alike and the rationale for using return to baseline as a more realistic and objective functional outcome measure for assessing sexual function in this particularly sensitive group of men. We performed a non-systematic literature review of numerous non-validated, arbitrary thresholds employed in evaluation of sexual function outcomes in men undergoing intervention for primary localised PCa. The literature presents much heterogeneity in measurement methods and outcome measures, which lack context and present difficulties when counselling patients to make informed, autonomous decisions. These include findings from the most widely used internationally validated tools, such as the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), UCLA prostate cancer index and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30). There is a need for standardisation of reporting outcomes following PCa treatment to facilitate evaluation of existing and emerging technologies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Reis LO, Montenegro R, Trinh QD. Radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer | Opinion: YES. Int Braz J Urol 2019; 45:424-427. [PMID: 31149789 PMCID: PMC6786109 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.03.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo O. Reis
- UroScience, Pontifícia Universidade de Campinas - PUC, Campinas, SP, Brasil
- Departamento de Urologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | - Rodrigo Montenegro
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Detti B, Baki M, Becherini C, Saieva C, Scartoni D, Giacomelli I, Trombetta L, Muntoni C, Olmetto E, Francolini G, Turkaj A, Topulli J, Ciabatti C, Carta G, Poggesi L, Delli Paoli C, Terziani F, Grassi R, Livi L. High-dose intensity-modulated radiation therapy as primary treatment of prostate cancer: genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicity and outcomes, a single-institution experience. Radiol Med 2019; 124:422-431. [PMID: 30607866 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0977-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostatectomy, radiotherapy and watchful waiting are the main therapeutic options available for local stage of prostate cancer (PCa). We report our experience on 394 patients affected by prostate cancer primarily treated with high-dose, image-guided, IMRT, focusing on gastrointestinal, genitourinary toxicities and biochemical control. METHODS From July 2003 to August 2014, 394 patients were treated with radical high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT) for prostate cancer; the mean total radiation dose was 79 Gy in standard fractions. Hormonal therapy (HT) was administered to 7.6% of low-risk patients, to 20.3% of intermediate-risk patients and to 72% of high-risk patients. Patients were evaluated for biochemical failure, local recurrence (LR) and metastases. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients (26.65%) developed acute GU toxicity at the medium dose of 25.4 Gy, grade 1 (G1) or grade 2 (G2) in 94 cases. Only 16 patients (4.06%) reported chronic GU toxicity (G1 or G2), and one case developed G3 cystitis. No G3 GI acute and late toxicity were detected. Fifty-six (14.2%) patients experienced LR, 26 (6.6%) developed metastases and 70 patients (17.8%) were deceased. Gleason sum score > 7 was predictive for worse overall survival (GS = 7 was borderline) and for metastasis. No factors resulted predictive for local relapse. HT pre-RT had been demonstrated as a negative predictor for OS and DFS-DM. CONCLUSIONS Data confirm the safety of HDRT for PCa. Treatment was efficient with low toxicity profile. Moreover, continued technologic advancements, as image-guided radiotherapy, could lead to further reduction in toxicity, thus increasing the therapeutic index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Detti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Muhammed Baki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Calogero Saieva
- Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute (ISPO), University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Irene Giacomelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Trombetta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Cristina Muntoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Emanuela Olmetto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ana Turkaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Juliana Topulli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Cinzia Ciabatti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Carta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Linda Poggesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Terziani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gokce A, Gul D. Re: Mark Douglas Tyson II, Tatsuki Koyama, Dan Lee, et al. Effect of Prostate Cancer Severity on Functional Outcomes After Localized Treatment: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation Study Results. Eur Urol 2018;74:26-33. Eur Urol 2018; 75:e157. [PMID: 30558898 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Gokce
- Sakarya University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Sakarya, Turkey.
| | - Deniz Gul
- Sakarya University School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Sakarya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Joachim C, Veronique-Baudin J, Almont T, Ulric-Gervaise S, Macni J, Pierre-Louis O, Godaert L, Drame M, Novella JL, Farid K, Vinh-Hung V, Escarmant P. Cohort profile: the Martinique Cancer Registry and the quality of life prostate cancer cohort (QoL Prostate-MQ): challenges and prospects for reducing disparities in the Caribbean. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021540. [PMID: 30049695 PMCID: PMC6067331 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recording cancer data in cancer registries is essential for producing reliable population-based data for service planning, monitoring and evaluation. Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the most frequent type of cancer in terms of incidence and mortality in men in the Caribbean. The quality of life PCa cohort will assess quality of life and patient outcomes in Martinique using a digital platform for patient-reported outcome measures. PARTICIPANTS The Martinique Cancer Registry database is the largest clinical database among the French population-based cancer registries in the Caribbean, including more than 38 000 cancer cases, with 1650 new cancer cases per year, including 550 new PCa cases per year (2010-2014 latest period). In 2018, follow-up will include vital status, assessment of quality of life with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core 30 and the Prostate cancer module QLQ-PR25. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction recorded prior to treatment will be analysed 1 and 5 years after treatment. FINDINGS TO DATE The registry includes data on circumstances of diagnosis, clinical stage at diagnosis. For PCa, the registry includes blood prostate-specific antigen level at the time of diagnosis, Gleason score and primary treatment. FUTURE PLANS Further studies will provide detailed data regarding the quality of diagnosis and management of patients with PCa in Martinique; analysing quality of care will be the next challenge.Quality of life and patient outcomes will be evaluated using a digital platform for patient-reported outcome measurement and electronic records.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarisse Joachim
- UF1441 Registre des cancers de la Martinique, Pôle de Cancérologie Hématologie Urologie Pathologie, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Jacqueline Veronique-Baudin
- UF1441 Registre des cancers de la Martinique, Pôle de Cancérologie Hématologie Urologie Pathologie, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Thierry Almont
- Groupe d’Étude, de Formation et de Recherche en Andrologie, Urologie et Sexologie Médecine de la Reproduction, Toulouse, France
- Groupe de recherche en fertilité humaine, CHU Toulouse Paule de Viguier, Toulouse, France
| | - Stephen Ulric-Gervaise
- UF1441 Registre des cancers de la Martinique, Pôle de Cancérologie Hématologie Urologie Pathologie, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Jonathan Macni
- UF1441 Registre des cancers de la Martinique, Pôle de Cancérologie Hématologie Urologie Pathologie, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Olivier Pierre-Louis
- Pôle de Cancérologie Hématologie Urologie Pathologie, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Lidvine Godaert
- Pôle de Gériatrie, CHU de Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Moustapha Drame
- Unité d’aide Méthodologique, Pôle Recherche et Santé publique, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
- EA 3797, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Faculté de Médecine, Reims, France
| | - Jean-Luc Novella
- EA 3797, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Faculté de Médecine, Reims, France
- Département de Médecine Interne et Gériatrie, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
| | - Karim Farid
- Service de Médecine nucléaire, Pole d’imagerie Médicale, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Vincent Vinh-Hung
- Pôle de Cancérologie Hématologie Urologie Pathologie, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| | - Patrick Escarmant
- Pôle de Cancérologie Hématologie Urologie Pathologie, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, Martinique
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van Stam MA, van der Poel H. The New Standard: Personalised Information about the Risks and Benefits of Treatment Strategies for Localised Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2018; 74:34-36. [PMID: 29656852 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Anne van Stam
- Department of Urology, Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni-Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni-Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|