Robust Health Utility Assessment Among Long-term Survivors of Prostate Cancer: Results from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor Registry

Cost-utility analysis of MR imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for the treatment of low- to intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (MR-TULSA) is a new focal therapy for treating localised prostate cancer that is associated with fewer adverse effects (AEs) compared with established treatments. To support large-scale clinical implementation, information about cost-effectiveness is required.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-utility of MR-TULSA compared with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and active surveillance (AS) for patients with low- to favourable intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A Markov model was developed targeting 60-year-old men diagnosed with low- to intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer over a time horizon of 40 years from the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) perspective. To assess the robustness of the results, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

INTERVENTION

Four different treatment strategies were compared: minimally invasive MR-TULSA, two definitive approaches (RARP and EBRT) and one observational strategy (AS).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Outcomes were measured in overall costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

AS generated the highest number of QALYs (12.67), followed by MR-TULSA (12.35), EBRT (12.35) and RARP (12.20). RARP generated the lowest costs (€ 46 997) over one patient's lifetime, while MR-TULSA was a slightly more expensive alternative (€48 826). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of AS compared with RARP was €11 600 per QALY and of MR-TULSA compared with RARP was €12 193 per QALY, while EBRT was dominated. At a willingness-to-pay of €20 000 per QALY, the probability of being cost-effective is 44% for AS, 25% for RARP, 25% for MR-TULSA and 6% for EBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

All treatment options for 60-year-old men diagnosed with low- to intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer are affected by considerable uncertainty. Accepting high follow-up costs by applying a higher willingness-to-pay, AS is the most favourable treatment option.

The curative effect of androgen deprivation therapy alone is insufficient in high-risk prostate cancer

To compare the outcomes of patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated by primary radical prostatectomy (RP) and primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).The study included patients with high-risk or very high-risk prostate cancer. Patients treated with definitive radiation therapy and those with clinical N1 and M1 disease were excluded. The RP group was divided into sub-cohorts of patients treated with ADT and those who received ADT after biochemical recurrence post-RP. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model.The study analyzed 859 patients divided into the RP group (n = 654) and ADT group (n = 205). Castration-resistant prostate cancer was detected in 23 (3.5%) patients in the RP group and 43 (21.0%) patients in the ADT group. Mortality cases included 63 (9.6%) patients in the RP group and 91 (44.4%) patients in the ADT group. CSS (P = .0002) and OS (P < .0001) were significantly higher in the RP group than in the ADT group. In the sub-cohort, CSS did not differ significantly between the RP and ADT groups, whereas OS was significantly higher in the RP group than in the ADT group (P < .0001). In the multivariate analysis, primary ADT increased CSS (hazard ratio, 2.068; P = .0498) and OS (hazard ratio, 3.218; P < .0001) compared with RP.In clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer patients, primary RP was associated with better CSS and OS than primary ADT. Comprehensive counseling in this cohort of patients will help the selection of treatment.

Dhavileswarapu AVL, Naik N, Karimi H, Hegde P, Rai BP, Somani BK. Big Data Analytics in urology: the story so far and the road ahead

Artificial intelligence (AI) has a proven record of application in the field of medicine and is used in various urological conditions such as oncology, urolithiasis, paediatric urology, urogynaecology, infertility and reconstruction. Data is the driving force of AI and the past decades have undoubtedly witnessed an upsurge in healthcare data. Urology is a specialty that has always been at the forefront of innovation and research and has rapidly embraced technologies to improve patient outcomes and experience. Advancements made in Big Data Analytics raised the expectations about the future of urology. This review aims to investigate the role of big data and its blend with AI for trends and use in urology. We explore the different sources of big data in urology and explicate their current and future applications. A positive trend has been exhibited by the advent and implementation of AI in urology with data available from several databases. The extensive use of big data for the diagnosis and treatment of urological disorders is still in its early stage and under validation. In future however, big data will no doubt play a major role in the management of urological conditions.

The Relative Impact of Urinary and Sexual Function vs Bother on Health Utility for Men With Prostate Cancer

Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Our analysis included participants in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor utility supplementary study, with a final cohort of 1617 men. Linear regression on the patients’ function and bother summary scores (0-100) from the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was performed to predict bias-corrected health utilities. Urinary and sexual bother were associated with each health utility, and their coefficients were 3.7 and 20.8 times greater, respectively, than those of the corresponding function. To our knowledge, our study provides the first quantitative and direct comparison of the impacts of function vs bother on health utility.

Understanding the Major Factors Affecting Response Shift Effects on Health-Related Quality of Life: What the Then-Test Measures in a Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Registry

BACKGROUND

Localized prostate cancer (PCa) treatments provide high survival rates, with patients often surviving a decade or longer after treatment. Therefore, treatment options are progressively based on quality of life. The objective of this research was to investigate magnitude of response shift (RS) in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) responses in men with clinically localized PCa using a generic questionnaire and a disease-specific questionnaire in an observational longitudinal patient registry study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort study was conducted using the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) database. Patients were annually surveyed using the Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (PCI) HRQOL measures. A total of 3161 active patients were eligible for a one-off supplemental study asking retrospective HRQOL scores (then-test). We calculated RS, observed change, and RS adjusted change. Statistical difference was determined by t test.

RESULTS

Patients consistently reported higher recalled pretreatment HRQOL compared to baseline scores for SF-36 and PCI, confirming the existence of a RS (P < .05). On average, PCI demonstrated larger RS by a factor of 2 than SF-36. More specific, RS was greater especially in SF-36 physical domains compared to mental health items. PCI measured PCa-specific physical adverse effects only. Patients whose cancer had recurred reported slightly lower SF-36 RS than those whose cancer had not recurred.

CONCLUSION

RS occurrence was measured in both the disease-specific questionnaire and the generic HRQOL questionnaire, demonstrating continued low health and symptom scores after RS adjustment. Therefore, health professionals should adjust for this phenomenon when assessing patient's HRQOL treatment responses, and clinicians should address their continued sexual and urinary functional loss.