1
|
Matsukawa A, Cormio A, Miszczyk M, Parizi MK, Fazekas T, Tsuboi I, Mancon S, Schulz RJ, Litterio G, Laukhtina E, Rajwa P, Seisen T, Mori K, Sanguedolce F, Galosi AB, Miki J, Kimura T, Shariat SF, Yanagisawa T. Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Network Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 2025:S2588-9311(25)00043-4. [PMID: 40288918 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/26/2025] [Indexed: 04/29/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has expanded perioperative treatment options for urothelial carcinoma. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant ICI-based regimens on oncological outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov in September 2024 for studies on neoadjuvant therapies for MIBC. A proportion meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) using random-effect models were conducted to evaluate pooled pathological complete response (pCR) rates and to compare overall survival (OS) and adverse events. The review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024587964). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS We included 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; 5004 patients) and 35 non-RCTs (2964 patients). ICI-chemotherapy combination therapy was associated with a significantly higher pCR rate versus chemotherapy alone (40.6% vs 17.9%; p < 0.01). In the two phase 3 RCTs included (1556 patients) there was no significant difference in OS between dose-dense methotrexate + vinblastine + Adriamycin + cisplatin (ddMVAC) and durvalumab + gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC; hazard ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.55; p = 0.8). ddMVAC significantly increased the risk of grade ≥3 anemia (risk ratio [RR] 2.81, 95% CI 1.62-4.88) and asthenia (RR 3.46, 95% CI 1.68-7.14) in comparison to GC, while durvalumab + GC did not. Limitations include data heterogeneity across studies and the limited number of studies included in the NMA. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS ICI addition to chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant MIBC setting significantly increased pCR rates in comparison to chemotherapy alone. However, there was no difference in OS between durvalumab + GC and ddMVAC. Further studies are needed to clarify the OS benefit of ICI-based combination therapy in comparison to the current standard chemotherapy regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Division of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Angelo Cormio
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marcin Miszczyk
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Collegium Medicum, WSB University, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tamás Fazekas
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ichiro Tsuboi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
| | - Stefano Mancon
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy; Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert J Schulz
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Giulio Litterio
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Anatomy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Paweł Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hôpital AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Di Ancona, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yanagisawa T, Matsukawa A, Teoh JYC, Mori K, Kawada T, Katayama S, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Pradere B, Moschini M, Shariat SF, Miki J, Kimura T. Advancements in systemic therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review from the beginning to the latest updates. Bladder Cancer 2025; 11:23523735251335122. [PMID: 40296876 PMCID: PMC12035237 DOI: 10.1177/23523735251335122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025]
Abstract
Context Several phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the importance of perioperative systemic therapy, especially for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Objective To synthesize the growing evidence on the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for MIBC utilizing the data from RCTs. Evidence acquisition Three databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in October 2024 for eligible RCTs evaluating oncologic outcomes in MIBC patients treated with systemic therapy. We evaluated pathological complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis Thirty-three RCTs (including 14 ongoing trials) were included in this systematic review. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved OS compared to radical cystectomy alone. Particularly, the VESPER trial demonstrated that dd-MVAC provided oncological benefits over GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.71), and PFS (HR: 0.70). Recently, the NIAGARA trial showed that perioperative durvalumab plus GC outperformed GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.75), and EFS (HR: 0.68). Despite the lack of data on overall AE rates in the VESPER trial, differential safety profiles in hematologic toxicity were reported between dd-MVAC and durvalumab plus GC regimens. In the adjuvant setting, no study provided the OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, only adjuvant nivolumab had significant DFS and OS benefits compared to placebo. Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains the current standard of care for MIBC. Durvalumab shed light on the promising impact of ICIs added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only ICI recommended as adjuvant therapy in patients who harbored adverse pathologic outcomes. Ongoing trials will provide further information on the impact of combination therapy, including chemotherapy, ICIs, and enfortumab vedotin, in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Surgery, S.H. Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Paweł Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bai Z, Osman M, Brendel M, Tangen CM, Flaig TW, Thompson IM, Plets M, Scott Lucia M, Theodorescu D, Gustafson D, Daneshmand S, Meeks JJ, Choi W, Dinney CPN, Elemento O, Lerner SP, McConkey DJ, Faltas BM, Wang F. Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer via interpretable multimodal deep learning. NPJ Digit Med 2025; 8:174. [PMID: 40121304 PMCID: PMC11929913 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-025-01560-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025] Open
Abstract
Building accurate prediction models and identifying predictive biomarkers for treatment response in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) are essential for improving patient survival but remain challenging due to tumor heterogeneity, despite numerous related studies. To address this unmet need, we developed an interpretable Graph-based Multimodal Late Fusion (GMLF) deep learning framework. Integrating histopathology and cell type data from standard H&E images with gene expression profiles derived from RNA sequencing from the SWOG S1314-COXEN clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02177695 2014-06-25), GMLF uncovered new histopathological, cellular, and molecular determinants of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Specifically, we identified key gene signatures that drive the predictive power of our model, including alterations in TP63, CCL5, and DCN. Our discovery can optimize treatment strategies for patients with MIBC, e.g., improving clinical outcomes, avoiding unnecessary treatment, and ultimately, bladder preservation. Additionally, our approach could be used to uncover predictors for other cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zilong Bai
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | - Thomas W Flaig
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ian M Thompson
- Children's Hospital of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Melissa Plets
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M Scott Lucia
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Daniel Gustafson
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fei Wang
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geynisman DM, Abbosh PH, Ross E, Zibelman MR, Ghatalia P, Anari F, Mark JR, Stamatakis L, Hoffman-Censits JH, Viterbo R, Greenberg RE, Churilla TM, Horwitz EM, Hallman MA, Smaldone MC, Uzzo R, Chen DY, Kutikov A, Plimack ER. Phase II Trial of Risk-Enabled Therapy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (RETAIN 1). J Clin Oncol 2025; 43:1113-1122. [PMID: 39680823 PMCID: PMC11908952 DOI: 10.1200/jco-24-01214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/30/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by cystectomy is the standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Mutations in DNA damage repair genes are associated with pathologic downstaging after NAC. We hypothesized that a combination of biomarker selection and clinical staging would identify patients for cystectomy-sparing active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a single-arm, phase II, noninferiority trial to evaluate a risk-adapted approach for MIBC. Patients with cT2-T3N0M0 MIBC underwent NAC with accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (AMVAC). Pre-NAC transurethral bladder tumor specimens were sequenced for mutations in ATM, ERCC2, FANCC, and RB1. Patients with ≥1 mutation and cT0 post-NAC began AS. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival (MFS) at 2 years for the entire cohort with the null hypothesis rejected if the lower bound exact one-sided 95% CI exceeds 64%. RESULTS Seventy patients were enrolled, 33 (47%) had a mutation, and 25 (36%) began per-protocol AS. With a median follow-up of 40 months, the 2-year MFS for all patients was 72.9% (lower bound exact one-sided 95% CI, 62.8). The 2-year MFS was 76.0% in the AS group (95% CI, 54.2 to 88.4) and 71.1% (95% CI, 55.5 to 82.1) in the remaining patients. In the AS group, 17 patients (68%) had some recurrence and 12 (48%) were metastasis-free with an intact bladder. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was 84.3% (95% CI, 73.4 to 91.0); OS was 88.0% (95% CI, 67.3 to 96.0) and 82.2% (95% CI, 67.6 to 90.7) in the AS and not-AS groups, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients with MIBC treated with AMVAC followed by a risk-adapted approach to local consolidation achieved a 2-year MFS rate of 73%. The primary end point was not met, but 17% of all enrolled patients and 48% of the AS group avoided cystectomy without metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eric Ross
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Fern Anari
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - James R. Mark
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hausmann J, Grunewald CM. [Can muscle invasive bladder cancer be treated without cystectomy in the future? : New data on trimodal therapy and bladder preservation after systemic therapy alone]. UROLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 63:985-993. [PMID: 39143395 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02420-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
Muscle invasive bladder cancer is generally an aggressive disease. Radical cystectomy (RC) is traditionally the treatment of choice. Due to possible advantages in morbidity, peri-interventional mortality, and quality of life, bladder-preserving treatment strategies are of interest. Here, trimodal therapy (TMT) consisting of maximum transurethral resection and subsequent radiochemotherapy with subsequent cystoscopic follow-up plays an important role. Current cohort analyses indicate equivalent oncological results of TMT to RC in selected patients. However, the use of systemic therapy alone with combined chemo-/immunotherapy or cytotoxic combination therapy also shows promising efficacy both in early surrogate parameters and in oncological endpoints. Overall, studies to date suggest that bladder preservation is possible without compromising oncologic outcomes. Future developments aim to refine patient selection by combining different risk factors and biomarkers to further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hausmann
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland
| | - Camilla M Grunewald
- Klinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hemenway G, Anker JF, Riviere P, Rose BS, Galsky MD, Ghatalia P. Advancements in Urothelial Cancer Care: Optimizing Treatment for Your Patient. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e432054. [PMID: 38771987 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_432054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
The standard treatment paradigm for muscle invasive bladder cancer has been neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. However, efforts are ongoing to personalize treatment by incorporating biomarkers to better guide treatment selection. In addition, bladder preservation strategies are aimed at avoiding cystectomy in well-selected patients. Similarly, in the metastatic urothelial cancer space, the standard frontline treatment option of platinum-based chemotherapy has changed with the availability of data from EV-302 trial, making the combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab the preferred first-line treatment option. Here, we examine the optimization of treatment intensity and sequencing, focusing on the challenges and opportunities associated with EV/pembrolizumab therapy, including managing toxicities and exploring alternative dosing approaches. Together, these articles provide a comprehensive overview of contemporary strategies in bladder cancer management, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment approaches, ongoing research, and multidisciplinary collaboration to improve patient outcomes in this complex disease landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan F Anker
- The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Paul Riviere
- UCSD Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, San Diego, CA
| | - Brent S Rose
- UCSD Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, San Diego, CA
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eule CJ, Warren A, Molina Kuna E, Callihan EB, Kim SP, Flaig TW. Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Nonmetastatic Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Meta-analysis to Determine the Preferred Regimen. Urology 2024; 188:118-124. [PMID: 38685388 PMCID: PMC11460315 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2024.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) vs dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (ddMVAC) before radical cystectomy improves overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and pathologic complete response (pCR) for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer with secondary analyses of pathological downstaging and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis identified studies of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with neoadjuvant GC compared to ddMVAC from PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Random-effect models for pooled log-transformed hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS and pooled odds ratios for pCR and downstaging were developed using the generic inverse variance method and Mantel-Haenszel method, respectively. RESULTS Ten studies were identified (4 OS, 2 PFS, and 6 pCR clinical endpoints). Neoadjuvant ddMVAC improved OS (HR 0.71 [95% confidence intervals 0.56; 0.90]), PFS (HR 0.76 [95% confidence intervals 0.60; 0.97]), and pathological downstaging (odds ratio 1.34 [95% confidence interval 1.01; 1.78]) as compared to GC. There was no significant difference between regimens for pCR rates (odds ratio 1.38 [95% confidence interval 0.90; 2.12]). Treatment toxicity was greater with ddMVAC. Limitations result from differences in number of ddMVAC cycles and patient selection between studies. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant ddMVAC is associated with improved OS and PFS vs gemcitabine/cisplatin for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer before radical cystectomy. Although rates of pathological complete response were not significantly different, pathological downstaging correlated with OS. ddMVAC should be preferred over gemcitabine/cisplatin for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who can tolerate its greater toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corbin J Eule
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
| | - Adam Warren
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Population Health Shared Resource, Aurora, CO.
| | - Elizabeth Molina Kuna
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Population Health Shared Resource, Aurora, CO.
| | - Eryn B Callihan
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
| | - Simon P Kim
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Aurora, CO.
| | - Thomas W Flaig
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim S, St-Laurent MP, Black P. Biomarker challenges in the pursuit of personalized neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: conclusions from SWOG S1314. Transl Androl Urol 2024; 13:458-462. [PMID: 38590957 PMCID: PMC10999026 DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Kim
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Marie-Pier St-Laurent
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|