Fenofibrate regulates retinal endothelial cell survival through the AMPK signal transduction pathway

What do You Need to Know after Diabetes and before Diabetic Retinopathy?

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision impairment and blindness among individuals with diabetes mellitus. Current clinical diagnostic criteria mainly base on visible vascular structure changes, which are insufficient to identify diabetic patients without clinical DR (NDR) but with dysfunctional retinopathy. This review focuses on retinal endothelial cells (RECs), the first cells to sense and respond to elevated blood glucose. As blood glucose rises, RECs undergo compensatory and transitional phases, and the correspondingly altered molecules are likely to become biomarkers and targets for early prediction and treatment of NDR with dysfunctional retinopathy. This article elaborated the possible pathophysiological processes focusing on RECs and summarized recently published and reliable biomarkers for early screening and emerging intervention strategies for NDR patients with dysfunctional retinopathy. Additionally, references for clinical medication selection and lifestyle recommendations for this population are provided. This review aims to deepen the understanding of REC biology and NDR pathophysiology, emphasizes the importance of early detection and intervention, and points out future directions to improve the diagnosis and treatment of NDR with dysfunctional retinopathy and to reduce the occurrence of DR.

Randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial of fenofibrate for treatment of diabetic macular oedema with economic evaluation (FORTE study): study protocol for a randomised control trial

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO), a serious ocular complication of diabetic retinopathy (DR), is a leading cause of vision impairment worldwide. If left untreated or inadequately treated, DMO can lead to irreversible vision loss and blindness. Intravitreal injections using antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and laser are the current standard of treatment for DMO. These treatments are costly and invasive and must be repeated over several years with a high service load. Fenofibrate has been shown to reduce the progression of DR. However, there is a lack of high-quality data on the effects of fenofibrate on established DMO. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of oral fenofibrate for the treatment of DMO.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial recruited 204 patients with DMO across three different clinics in Sydney. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive oral fenofibrate (145 mg) taken once daily for 24 months, while the control group will receive placebo tablets taken once daily for 24 months. Standard care with anti-VEGF injections, focal lasers or observation will also be provided to all participants regardless of their group allocation. The primary outcome is the reduction in DMO measured using central macular subfield thickness (CSMT) on optical coherence tomography imaging at 24 months. Secondary outcomes at 24 months include the proportion of eyes with CSMT <250 µm, number of anti-VEGF injections, number of laser sessions needed, best-corrected visual acuity letter score gains, rates of adverse events, progression in DR lesions and changes in quality of life measures. Comparison between groups will be evaluated using analysis of variance. Multiple regression analyses adjusting for age, glycated haemoglobin, number of injections and other covariates will also be performed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been granted by the University of Sydney Human Ethics Committee (HREC-2019/892), and the trial has been registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618000592246). The study adheres to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and the National Health and Medical Research Council National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Trial results will be disseminated to the public in de-identified form through publications in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRY NAME

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12618000592246.

Fenofibrate as an Adjunct Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis: Targeting Inflammation via SIRT1, NLRP3, and AMPK Pathways: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

Background

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic chronic inflammation of colonic and rectal mucosa. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) has been identified as having protective effects in UC.

Aim

The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of fenofibrate, a PPARα agonist, in UC.

Methods

A total of 70 patients with mild to moderate UC were allocated randomly and assigned to two groups (n = 35 each) from Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University. The mesalamine group received a placebo along with 1 g of mesalamine three times daily, while the fenofibrate group received 1 g of mesalamine three times and fenofibrate 160 mg once daily. The study duration was for six months. A gastroenterologist assessed patients by non-invasive Partial Mayo Score (PMS) and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) to evaluate clinical response and remission. The serum levels of silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1), NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), and adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK), as well as fecal calprotectin levels were examined to determine the biological effect of fenofibrate.

Results

After treatment, the fenofibrate group showed statistically significant reductions in PMS (p = 0.044) and improved digestive domain of IBDQ (p = 0.023). Additionally, there were significant decreases in serum NLRP3 (p = 0.041) and fecal calprotectin (p = 0.035), along with significant increases in SIRT1 (p = 0.002) and AMPK (p = 0.0003). The fenofibrate group also had higher response and remission rates compared to the mesalamine group.

Conclusion

Fenofibrate may be a promising adjunct for improving clinical outcomes, quality of life, and modulating inflammation in mild to moderate patients with UC.

Trial Registration Identifier

NCT05781698.

Fenofibrate Ameliorates Retinal Pigment Epithelium Injury Induced by Excessive Fat Through Upregulation of PI3K/AKT Signaling

Purpose

This study aimed to determine the effect and its mechanism of fenofibrate on retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) injury induced by excessive fat in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

ARPE-19 cells were co-incubated with palmitic acid (PA) and fenofibric acid (the active form of fenofibrate after metabolism in vivo) and mice fed with high-fat diet (HFD) were supplemented with fenofibrate. The following methods were used: Western blot and immunofluorescent staining to determine expressions of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-associated factors and proinflammatory cytokines; electroretinogram (ERG) c-wave to evaluate RPE function; TUNEL staining to detect the apoptotic cell in RPE tissue. Additionally, ARPE19 cells were treated with PI3K/AKT inhibitor or agonist to investigate the mechanism of fenofibric acid inhibiting PA-induced RPE damage.

Results

We found that the application of PA inhibited RPE cell viability in a dose-dependent manner, and increased the levels of NAPDH oxidase 4 (NOX4), 3-nitrotyrosin (3-NT), intracellular adhesion molecule-1(ICAM1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) at 400μM. The application of fenofibric acid resulted in the inhibition of NOX4, 3-NT, TNFα, ICAM1 and VEGF expression in ARPE-19 cells treated with PA. Moreover, wortmannin, as a selective inhibitor of PI3K/AKT pathway, abolished the effects of fenofibrate on the oxidative stress and inflammation in ARPE-19 cells. In addition, 740Y-P, a selective agonist of PI3K/AKT pathway, enhanced the protective action of fenofibrate. Meanwhile, in vivo dosing of fenofibrate ameliorated the downregulated amplitudes of ERG c-wave in HFD-fed mice and suppressed the HFD-induced oxidative injury and inflammatory response in RPE tissues.

Conclusion

Our results suggested that fenofibrate ameliorated RPE cell damage induced by excessive fat in vitro and in vivo, in part, through activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

Perilipin 2-positive mononuclear phagocytes accumulate in the diabetic retina and promote PPARγ-dependent vasodegeneration

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), characterized by hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia, leads to nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). NPDR is associated with blood-retina barrier disruption, plasma exudates, microvascular degeneration, elevated inflammatory cytokine levels, and monocyte (Mo) infiltration. Whether and how the diabetes-associated changes in plasma lipid and carbohydrate levels modify Mo differentiation remains unknown. Here, we show that mononuclear phagocytes (MPs) in areas of vascular leakage in DR donor retinas expressed perilipin 2 (PLIN2), a marker of intracellular lipid load. Strong upregulation of PLIN2 was also observed when healthy donor Mos were treated with plasma from patients with T2DM or with palmitate concentrations typical of those found in T2DM plasma, but not under high-glucose conditions. PLIN2 expression correlated with the expression of other key genes involved in lipid metabolism (ACADVL, PDK4) and the DR biomarkers ANGPTL4 and CXCL8. Mechanistically, we show that lipid-exposed MPs induced capillary degeneration in ex vivo explants that was inhibited by pharmaceutical inhibition of PPARγ signaling. Our study reveals a mechanism linking dyslipidemia-induced MP polarization to the increased inflammatory cytokine levels and microvascular degeneration that characterize NPDR. This study provides comprehensive insights into the glycemia-independent activation of Mos in T2DM and identifies MP PPARγ as a target for inhibition of lipid-activated MPs in DR.

Hyperlipidemia and lipid-lowering therapy in diabetic retinopathy (DR): A bibliometric study and visualization analysis in 1993-2023

Background

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common complication in diabetic patients. DR is also a neurodegenerative disease. Patients with hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension are vulnerable to retinopathy development. While the roles of blood glucose and blood pressure in the development of retinopathy have been extensively studied, the relationship between body fat and DR pathogenesis and the impact of lipid-reducing drugs on DR has just emerged as a research hotspot in DR study. We aim to visualize the contributions and cooperation of reporters, organizations, and nations, in addition to the research hotspots and trends in DR-related lipid research from 1993 to 2023, by bibliometric analysis.

Methods

We extracted all publications about DR-related lipid research from 1993 to 2023 from the Web of Science Core Collection, and bibliometric features were studied using VOSviewer and the CiteSpace program.

Results

1402 documents were retrieved. The number of studies has risen consistently for three decades, from an average of 16.8/year in the 1990s to 28.8/year in the 2000s, 64.5/year in 2010s, and reached 112/year in 2020-2022, confirming they are hot research topic in the field. These reports were from 93 nations/regions, with the USA, China, Japan, Australia, and England taking the leading positions. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice was the journal that published the most studies, and Diabetes Care was the most quoted. We identified 6979 authors, with Wong TY having the most papers and being the most commonly co-cited. The most popular keyword, according to our research, is diabetic retinopathy. Oxidative stress, diabetic macular edema (DME), lipid peroxidation, and other topics have often been investigated.

Conclusion

DR-related lipid research is conducted mainly in North America, Asia, Oceania, and Europe. Much study has centered on the relationship between lipid-lowering therapy and DR pathogenesis. These studies strongly support using lipid-reducing medications (fenofibrate, statins, and omega-3 PUFAs), combined with hyperglycemia and hypertension therapy, to prevent and treat DR. However, the impact of fenofibrate or statin on retinopathy is not correlated with their action on blood lipid profiles. Thus, more randomized clinical trials with primary endpoints related to DR in T1D or T2D are merited. In addition, the lipid biomarker for DR (lipid aldehydes, ALEs, and cholesterol crystals), the action of lipid-reducing medicines on retinopathy, the mechanism of lipid-lowering medications preventing or curing DR, and ocular delivery of lipid-lowering drugs to diabetic patients are predicted as the research focus in the future in the DR-related lipid research field.

Fenofibrate Attenuates Renal Tubular Cell Apoptosis by Up-Regulating MCAD in Diabetic Kidney Disease

Background

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a major diabetic microvascular complication. Fatty acid-induced lipotoxicity and apoptosis were associated with the exacerbation of DKD. However, the association of lipotoxicity with renal tubular apoptosis and the effects of fenofibrate on DKD are not fully understood.

Methods

Eight-week-old db/db mice were given fenofibrate or saline by gavage for 8 weeks. Human kidney proximal tubular epithelial (HK2) cells stimulated with palmitic acid (PA) and high glucose (HG) were used as a model of lipid metabolism disorders. Apoptosis was assessed with or without fenofibrate. The AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR) and AMPK inhibitor Compound C were used to determine the involvement of AMPK and Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) in the regulation of lipid accumulation by fenofibrate. MCAD silencing was achieved by small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection.

Results

Fenofibrate reduced triglyceride (TG) content and lipid accumulation in DKD. Importantly, renal function and tubular cell apoptosis were significantly improved by fenofibrate. Fenofibrate reduced apoptosis, accompanied by increased activation of the AMPK/FOXA2/MCAD pathway. MCAD silencing resulted in apoptosis and lipid accumulation despite fenofibrate treatment.

Conclusion

Fenofibrate improves lipid accumulation and apoptosis through the AMPK/FOXA2/MCAD pathway. MCAD may be a potential therapeutic target of DKD, and the use of fenofibrate as a treatment for DKD warrants further study.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) regulates wound healing and mitochondrial metabolism in the cornea

Diabetes can result in impaired corneal wound healing. Mitochondrial dysfunction plays an important role in diabetic complications. However, the regulation of mitochondria function in the diabetic cornea and its impacts on wound healing remain elusive. The present study aimed to explore the molecular basis for the disturbed mitochondrial metabolism and subsequent wound healing impairment in the diabetic cornea. Seahorse analysis showed that mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is a major source of ATP production in human corneal epithelial cells. Live corneal biopsy punches from type 1 and type 2 diabetic mouse models showed impaired mitochondrial functions, correlating with impaired corneal wound healing, compared to nondiabetic controls. To approach the molecular basis for the impaired mitochondrial function, we found that Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α (PPARα) expression was downregulated in diabetic human corneas. Even without diabetes, global PPARα knockout mice and corneal epithelium-specific PPARα conditional knockout mice showed disturbed mitochondrial function and delayed wound healing in the cornea, similar to that in diabetic corneas. In contrast, fenofibrate, a PPARα agonist, ameliorated mitochondrial dysfunction and enhanced wound healing in the corneas of diabetic mice. Similarly, corneal epithelium-specific PPARα transgenic overexpression improved mitochondrial function and enhanced wound healing in the cornea. Furthermore, PPARα agonist ameliorated the mitochondrial dysfunction in primary human corneal epithelial cells exposed to diabetic stressors, which was impeded by siRNA knockdown of PPARα, suggesting a PPARα-dependent mechanism. These findings suggest that downregulation of PPARα plays an important role in the impaired mitochondrial function in the corneal epithelium and delayed corneal wound healing in diabetes.

Autophagy-nutrient sensing pathways in diabetic complications

The incidence of diabetes has been increasing in recent decades which is affecting the population of both, developed and developing countries. Diabetes is associated with micro and macrovascular complications which predominantly result from hyperglycemia and disrupted metabolic pathways. Persistent hyperglycemia leads to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, formation of misfolded and abnormal proteins, and disruption of normal cellular functioning. The inability to maintain metabolic homeostasis under excessive energy and nutrient input, which induces insulin resistance, is a crucial feature during the transition from obesity to diabetes. According to various study reports, redox alterations, intracellular stress and chronic inflammation responses have all been linked to dysregulated energy metabolism and insulin resistance. Autophagy has been considered a cleansing mechanism to prevent these anomalies and restore cellular homeostasis. However, disrupted autophagy has been linked to the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders such as obesity and diabetes. Recent studies have reported that the regulation of autophagy has a beneficial role against these conditions. When there is plenty of food, nutrient-sensing pathways activate anabolism and storage, but the shortage of food activates homeostatic mechanisms like autophagy, which mobilises internal stockpiles. These nutrient-sensing pathways are well conserved in eukaryotes and are involved in the regulation of autophagy which includes SIRT1, mTOR and AMPK. The current review focuses on the role of SIRT1, mTOR and AMPK in regulating autophagy and suggests autophagy along with these nutrient-sensing pathways as potential therapeutic targets in reducing the progression of various diabetic complications.

The Effect of Hyperlipidemia on the Course of Diabetic Retinopathy—Literature Review

Diabetes mellitus is a very important social issue, and its retinal complications continue to be one of the major causes of blindness worldwide. The effect of glucose level on the development of retinal retinopathy has been the subject of numerous studies and is well understood. Hypertension and hyperlipidemia have been known to be important risk factors in the development of diabetes complications. However, the mechanisms of this effect have not been fully explained and raise a good deal of controversy. The latest research results suggest that some lipoproteins are closely correlated with the incidence of diabetic retinopathy and that by exerting an impact on their level the disease course can be modulated. Moreover, pharmacotherapy which reduces the level of lipids, particularly by means of statins and fibrate, has been shown to alleviate diabetic retinopathy. Therefore, we have decided to review the latest literature on diabetic retinopathy with respect to the impact of hyperlipidemia and possible preventive measures

Diabetic macular edema treatment guidelines in India: All India Ophthalmological Society Diabetic Retinopathy Task Force and Vitreoretinal Society of India consensus statement

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common cause of moderate visual impairment among people with diabetes. Due to the rising number of people with diabetes in India, the absolute numbers of people with DME are significant. There are several treatment options for DME, and the choice of treatment is based on the availability of retinal specialists and infrastructure for the delivery of treatment. A major challenge is the out-of-pocket expenditure incurred by patients as most treatment options are costly. Treatment also varies based on the associated ocular and systemic conditions. The All India Ophthalmology Society (AIOS) and the Vitreo-Retinal Society of India (VRSI) have developed this consensus statement of the AIOS DR task force and VRSI on practice points of DME management in India. The objective is to describe the preferred practice patterns for the management of DME considering the different presentations of DME in different clinical scenarios.

Neurovascular Unit: A New Target for Treating Early Stages of Diabetic Retinopathy

The concept of diabetic retinopathy as a microvascular disease has evolved and is now considered a more complex diabetic complication in which neurovascular unit impairment plays an essential role and, therefore, can be considered as a main therapeutic target in the early stages of the disease. However, neurodegeneration is not always the apparent primary event in the natural story of diabetic retinopathy, and a phenotyping characterization is recommendable to identify those patients in whom neuroprotective treatment might be of benefit. In recent years, a myriad of treatments based on neuroprotection have been tested in experimental models, but more interestingly, there are drugs with a dual activity (neuroprotective and vasculotropic). In this review, the recent evidence concerning the therapeutic approaches targeting neurovascular unit impairment will be presented, along with a critical review of the scientific gaps and problems which remain to be overcome before our knowledge can be transferred to clinical practice.

CEPT1-Mediated Phospholipogenesis Regulates Endothelial Cell Function and Ischemia-Induced Angiogenesis Through PPARα

De novo phospholipogenesis, mediated by choline-ethanolamine phosphotransferase 1 (CEPT1), is essential for phospholipid activation of transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) in the liver. Fenofibrate, a PPARα agonist and lipid-lowering agent, decreases amputation incidence in patients with diabetes. Because we previously observed that CEPT1 is elevated in carotid plaque of patients with diabetes, we evaluated the role of CEPT1 in peripheral arteries and PPARα phosphorylation (Ser12). CEPT1 was found to be elevated in diseased lower-extremity arterial intima of individuals with peripheral arterial disease and diabetes. To evaluate the role of Cept1 in the endothelium, we engineered a conditional endothelial cell (EC)-specific deletion of Cept1 via induced VE-cadherin-CreERT2-mediated recombination (Cept1Lp/LpCre ⁺). Cept1Lp/LpCre ⁺ ECs demonstrated decreased proliferation, migration, and tubule formation, and Cept1Lp/LpCre ⁺ mice had reduced perfusion and angiogenesis in ischemic hind limbs. Peripheral ischemic recovery and PPARα signaling were further compromised by streptozotocin-induced diabetes and ameliorated by feeding fenofibrate. Cept1 endoribonuclease-prepared siRNA decreased PPARα phosphorylation in ECs, which was rescued with fenofibrate but not PC16:0/18:1. Unlike Cept1Lp/LpCre ⁺ mice, Cept1Lp/LpCre ⁺ Ppara ^-/- mice did not demonstrate hind-paw perfusion recovery after feeding fenofibrate. Therefore, we demonstrate that CEPT1 is essential for EC function and tissue recovery after ischemia and that fenofibrate rescues CEPT1-mediated activation of PPARα.

Integration of genomics and transcriptomics predicts diabetic retinopathy susceptibility genes

We determined differential gene expression in response to high glucose in lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from matched individuals with type 1 diabetes with and without retinopathy. Those genes exhibiting the largest difference in glucose response were assessed for association with diabetic retinopathy in a genome-wide association study meta-analysis. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) of the glucose response genes were tested for association with diabetic retinopathy. We detected an enrichment of the eQTLs from the glucose response genes among small association p-values and identified folliculin (FLCN) as a susceptibility gene for diabetic retinopathy. Expression of FLCN in response to glucose was greater in individuals with diabetic retinopathy. Independent cohorts of individuals with diabetes revealed an association of FLCN eQTLs with diabetic retinopathy. Mendelian randomization confirmed a direct positive effect of increased FLCN expression on retinopathy. Integrating genetic association with gene expression implicated FLCN as a disease gene for diabetic retinopathy.

One of the side effects of diabetes is loss of vision from diabetic retinopathy, which is caused by injury to the light sensing tissue in the eye, the retina. Almost all individuals with diabetes develop diabetic retinopathy to some extent, and it is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss in working-age adults in the United States. How long a person has been living with diabetes, the extent of increased blood sugars and genetics all contribute to the risk and severity of diabetic retinopathy. Unfortunately, virtually no genes associated with diabetic retinopathy have yet been identified.

When a gene is activated, it produces messenger molecules known as mRNA that are used by cells as instructions to produce proteins. The analysis of mRNA molecules, as well as genes themselves, can reveal the role of certain genes in disease. The studies of all genes and their associated mRNAs are respectively called genomics and transcriptomics. Genomics reveals what genes are present, while transcriptomics shows how active genes are in different cells.

Skol et al. developed methods to study genomics and transcriptomics together to help discover genes that cause diabetic retinopathy. Genes involved in how cells respond to high blood sugar were first identified using cells grown in the lab. By comparing the activity of these genes in people with and without retinopathy the study identified genes associated with an increased risk of retinopathy in diabetes. In people with retinopathy, the activity of the folliculin gene (FLCN) increased more in response to high blood sugar. This was further verified with independent groups of people and using computer models to estimate the effect of different versions of the folliculin gene.

The methods used here could be applied to understand complex genetics in other diseases. The results provide new understanding of the effects of diabetes. They may also help in the development of new treatments for diabetic retinopathy, which are likely to improve on the current approach of using laser surgery or injections into the eye.

Effects of Modified Low-Density Lipoproteins and Fenofibrate on an Outer Blood-Retina Barrier Model: Implications for Diabetic Retinopathy

Purpose: There is a lack of treatment for early diabetic retinopathy (DR), including blood-retina barrier (BRB) breakdown. The robust clinical benefit of fenofibrate in DR provides an opportunity to explore disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets. We have previously found that modified lipoproteins contribute to DR and that fenofibrate protects the inner BRB. We now investigate (1) whether modified lipoproteins elicit outer BRB injury and (2) whether fenofibrate may alleviate such damage.

Methods: Human retinal pigment epithelium ARPE-19 cells were cultured in semipermeable transwells to establish a monolayer barrier and then exposed to heavily oxidized, glycated low-density lipoprotein (HOG-LDL, 25–300 mg/L, up to 24 h) versus native (N)-LDL. Transepithelial electric resistance (TEER) and FITC-dextran permeability were measured. The effects of fenofibrate, its active metabolite fenofibric acid, and other peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARα) agonists (gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, and WY14643) were evaluated, with and without the PPARα antagonist GW6471 or the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) inhibitor Compound C.

Results: HOG-LDL induced concentration- and time-dependent barrier impairment, decreasing TEER and increasing dextran leakage, effects that were amplified by high glucose. Fenofibric acid, but not fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, bezafibrate, or WY14643, attenuated barrier impairment. This effect was reversed significantly by Compound C, but not by GW6471.

Conclusions: Modified lipoproteins elicited outer BRB injury in an experimental model, which was reduced by fenofibric acid through a PPARα-independent, AMPK-mediated mechanism. These findings suggest a protective role of fenofibric acid on the outer BRB in diabetic retina.

Protective Effect of Fenofibrate on Oxidative Stress-Induced Apoptosis in Retinal-Choroidal Vascular Endothelial Cells: Implication for Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important microvascular complication of diabetes and one of the leading causes of blindness in developed countries. Two large clinical studies showed that fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor type α (PPAR-α) agonist, reduces DR progression. We evaluated the protective effects of fenofibrate on retinal/choroidal vascular endothelial cells under oxidative stress and investigated the underlying mechanisms using RF/6A cells as the model system and paraquat (PQ) to induce oxidative stress. Pretreatment with fenofibrate suppressed reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, decreased cellular apoptosis, diminished the changes in the mitochondrial membrane potential, increased the mRNA levels of peroxiredoxin (Prx), thioredoxins (Trxs), B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), and Bcl-xl, and reduced the level of B-cell lymphoma 2-associated X protein (Bax) in PQ-stimulated RF/6A cells. Western blot analysis revealed that fenofibrate repressed apoptosis through cytosolic and mitochondrial apoptosis signal-regulated kinase-1 (Ask)-Trx-related signaling pathways, including c-Jun amino-terminal kinase (JNK) phosphorylation, cytochrome c release, caspase 3 activation, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) cleavage. These protective effects of fenofibrate on RF/6A cells may be attributable to its anti-oxidative ability. Our research suggests that fenofibrate could serve as an effective adjunct therapy for ocular oxidative stress-related disorders, such as DR.

Association of Fenofibrate and Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan

Background and Objectives: Fenofibrate, a PPAR-α agonist, has been demonstrated to reduce the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the need for laser treatment in a FIELD (Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes) study. However, in the subgroup of patients without pre-existing DR, there was no significant difference in the progression of DR between the fenofibrate group and the placebo group. In this study, we aim to investigate whether fenofibrate can decrease the risk of incident DR in a population-based cohort study of type 2 diabetic patients in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: A total of 32,253 type 2 diabetic patients without previous retinopathy were retrieved from 892,419 patients in 2001-2002. They were then divided into two groups based on whether they were exposed to fenofibrate or not. The patients were followed until a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy was made or until the year 2008. Results: With a follow-up period of 6.8 ± 1.5 years and 5.4 ± 2.6 years for 2500 fenofibrate users and 29,753 non-users, respectively, the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that the hazard ratio (HR) of new onset retinopathy was 0.57 (95% CI 0.57-0.62, p < 0.001). After adjusting for hypertension; the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI); and medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), anticoagulants, gemfibrozil, statins, and hypoglycemic agents, the adjusted HR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.82, p < 0.001). The need for laser treatment has an HR and adjusted HR of 0.59 (95% CI 0.49-0.71, p < 0.001) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.56-0.81, p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Our study showed that the long-term and regular use of fenofibrate may decrease the risk of incident retinopathy and the need for laser treatment in type 2 diabetic patients. Since there are limitations associated with our study, further investigations are necessary to confirm such an association.

Opposing Effects of PPARα Agonism and Antagonism on Refractive Development and Form Deprivation Myopia in Guinea Pigs

Purpose

To determine if drug-induced peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) signal pathway modulation affects refractive development and myopia in guinea pigs.

Methods

Pigmented guinea pigs were randomly divided into normal vision (unoccluded) and form deprivation myopia (FDM) groups. Each group received daily peribulbar injections of either a vehicle or (1) PPARα agonist, GW7647, clofibrate, or bezafibrate or (2) PPARα antagonist, GW6471, for 4 weeks. Baseline and posttreatment refraction and ocular biometric parameters were measured. Immunofluorescent staining of PPARα and two of its downstream readouts, cytosolic malic enzyme 1 (ME1) and apolipoproteinA II (apoA-II), was undertaken in selected scleral sections. Western blot analysis determined collagen type I expression levels.

Results

GW6471 induced a myopic shift in unoccluded eyes, but had no effect on form-deprived eyes. Conversely, GW7647 inhibited FDM progression without altering unoccluded eyes. Bezafibrate and clofibrate had effects on refraction similar to those of GW7647 in unoccluded and form-deprived eyes. GW6471 downregulated collagen type I expression in unoccluded eyes whereas bezafibrate inhibited collagen type I decreases in form-deprived eyes. GW6471 also reduced the density of ME1- and apoA-II-stained cells in unoccluded eyes whereas bezafibrate increased apoA-II-positive cell numbers in form-deprived eyes.

Conclusions

As GW7647 and GW6471 had opposing effects on myopia development, PPARα signaling modulation may be involved in this condition in guinea pigs. Fibrates are potential candidates for treating myopia since they reduced both FDM and the associated axial elongation. Bezafibrate also inhibited form deprivation-induced decreases in scleral collagen type I expression and the density of apoA-II expressing cells.

Fenofibrate improves vascular endothelial function in diabetic mice

Microvascular and macrovascular complications are major causes of disability and death in diabetic patients. High levels of blood glucose sabotage the integrity of blood vessels and induce endothelial dysfunction. Fenofibrate is an agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α and can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in diabetic patients. This study tested the hypothesis that fenofibrate could ameliorate endothelium-dependent vasodilation in diabetic mice and relieve high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction via activating endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) phosphorylation. A streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic model was established by intraperitoneal injection of STZ (dissolved in sodium citrate buffer) at a dose of 60 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days. Mice were administered fenofibrate (100 mg/kg/d, i.g.) for 14 days. The endothelial function of extracted mouse aortae was examined by evaluating acetylcholine induced endothelium-dependent relaxation combined with phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction and sodium nitroprusside-induced endothelium-independent relaxation. Superoxide onion (O₂^-) was determined using dihydroethidium staining of aortae. Functions of mouse aortic endothelial cells (MAECs) were assessed, and expression levels of eNOS and AMPK were determined by Western blotting. Fenofibrate ameliorated the impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation in diabetic mice and decreased the level of intracellular O₂- in diabetic mouse aortae. In-vitro, fenofibrate treatment improved the impaired function of MAECs, increased nitric oxide production, and decreased the O₂- level, as well as activated eNOS and AMPK phosphorylation in cultured MAECs by high glucose. Fenofibrate could ameliorate endothelium-dependent vasodilation in diabetic mice and relieve high glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction, which was possibly related to the activation of eNOS and AMPK phosphorylation.

A non-invasive, multi-target approach to treat diabetic retinopathy

Hyperglycemia invoke number of pathways resulting in development of diabetic retinopathy (DR), including protein kinase C activation, increased expression of VEGF, advanced glycation end product (AGEs) formation and activation of polyol pathway, among which the pathophysiology of aldose reductase (ALR2) of the polyol pathway is evident by more than a decade of research. Subtle involvement of ALR2 in invoking various pathways of diabetic complications has caused an increase in attention towards the identification of novel aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs). Numerous ARIs of different classes were employed in the treatment of diabetic complications initially, but few came into light as drugs. Though no ALR2 inhibitor has been used for the treatment or control of DR, Epalrestat has been used worldwide for treating diabetic neuropathy. This review critically analyses different treatments available for diabetic retinopathy, their limitations and the importance of the development of novel inhibitors of ALR2 that could prevent progression of DR, by causing a direct or indirect effect on controlling factors associated with DR.

Fenofibrate improves vascular endothelial function and contractility in diabetic mice

Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α (PPARα) agonist, reduces vascular complications of diabetic patients but its protective mechanisms are not fully understood. Here we tested the hypothesis that fenofibrate improves vascular endothelial dysfunction by balancing endothelium-dependent relaxation and contractility of the aorta in diabetes mellitus (DM). In streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice, eight weeks of fenofibrate treatment (100 mg/Kg/d) improved endothelium dependent relaxation in the macro- and microvessels, increased nitric oxide (NO) levels, reduced renal damage markers and effects of the vasoconstrictor prostaglandin. Levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase were both reduced and hydrogen peroxide was increased in vehicle-treated DM, but these changes were reversed by fenofibrate treatment. Vasodilation of the aorta after fenofibrate treatment was reversed by PPARα or AMPKα inhibitors. Western blots showed that fenofibrate treatment elevated PPARα expression, induced liver kinase B1 (LKB1) translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and activated AMP-activated protein kinase-α (AMPKα), thus activating endothelial NO synthase (eNOS). Also, fenofibrate treatment decreased NF-κB p65 and cyclooxygenase 2 proteins in aortas. Finally, incubation with indomethacin in vitro improved aortic contractility in diabetic mice. Overall, our results show that fenofibrate treatment in diabetic mice normalizes endothelial function by balancing vascular reactivity via increasing NO production and suppressing the vasoconstrictor prostaglandin, suggesting mechanism of action of fenofibrate in mediating diabetic vascular complications.

•

Fenofibrate improves diabetic endothelial function is via PPAR/LKB1/AMPK/eNOS signal.

•

Fenofibrate reduces diabetic endothelial contractility is via NF-κB/COX-2 pathway.

•

Diabetes-associated oxidative stress is attenuated by fenofibrate treatment.

Protective role of fenofibrate in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury in BALB/c mice

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe complication of sepsis, which largely contributes to the associated high mortality rate. Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor α (PPARα) agonist, has received considerable attention because of its effects related to renal damage-related energy metabolism and inflammation. The present study investigated the effects of fenofibrate on sepsis-associated AKI in BALB/c mice subjected to caecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Eight-week-old male BALB/c mice were divided into four groups: control group, fenofibrate group, caecal ligation and puncture (CLP) group, and fenofibrate + CLP group. CLP was performed after mice were gavaged with fenofibrate for 2 weeks. After 48 hours, we measured the histopathological alterations of the kidney tissue and plasma levels of serum creatinine (CRE), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), reactive oxygen species (ROS), ATP, and ADP. We evaluated PPARα and P53 protein levels as well as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-α mRNA levels. Our results showed that administering fenofibrate significantly reduced kidney histological alterations caused by CLP. Fenofibrate inhibited the plasma levels of ROS, CRE, NGAL, and increased the ATP/ADP ratio. Fenofibrate significantly inhibited elevations in P53, IL-1β, IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-α expression. The results suggest that fenofibrate administration effectively modulates energy metabolism and may be a novel approach to treat sepsis-induced renal damage.

Fenofibrate effects on carotid artery intima-media thickness in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A FIELD substudy

AIM

Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes contributes to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Fenofibrate, a lipid-regulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) agonist, has been shown to reduce vascular complications in adults with type 2 diabetes. The mechanisms for such benefit, however, are not yet well understood. We examined the effects of fenofibrate on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, in adults with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

In a prospectively designed substudy of the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, we assessed carotid IMT in a subset of 422 representative adults. Traditional risk factors and IMT were assessed at 2 and 4 years after randomisation to fenofibrate (200 mg daily) or placebo. The prespecified primary study endpoint was the difference in IMT between treatment groups at 4 years. Post-hoc analyses were performed according to dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome status.

RESULTS

There was no difference in carotid IMT comparing those assigned to fenofibrate or placebo at 2 or 4 years, despite statistically significant improvement in lipid and lipoprotein parameters at 2 and 4 years, including TC, LDL-C and TG, and HDL-C at 4 months and 2 years. Similarly, there was no difference in carotid IMT on fenofibrate compared with placebo in those with dyslipidemia or metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Fenofibrate was not associated with improved carotid IMT in adults with type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo, despite a statistically significant improvement in TC, LDL-C and TG at 2 and 4 years, and HDL-C at 4 months and 2 years.

Efficiency of fenofibrate in facilitating the reduction of central macular thickness in diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to study the benefit of addition of oral fenofibrate to the current regimen of diabetic macular edema (DME) management and quantify its effect on macular thickness and visual function in DME.

METHODS

Fifty-three eyes of 50 patients were randomized into treatment (Group A) (oral fenofibrate 160 mg/day) and control groups (Group B). Both groups underwent treatment of DME as per the standard treatment protocol of our hospital including intravitreal injections (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/steroid) and grid laser. Patients were followed up every 2 months to note the visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) for 6 months.

RESULTS

Our groups were matched with respect to age (P = 0.802), mean diabetic age (P = 0.878), serum HbA1C levels (P = 0.523), and serum triglyceride levels (P = 0.793). The mean reduction in CMT was 136 μ in Group A and 83 μ in Group B at the end of 6 months. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.031). Visual acuity improvement was 0.15 in Group A and 0.11 in Group B at the end of 6 months (P = 0.186). On subgroup analysis in Group A, we found that there was no difference in reduction of CMT between hypertensives and normotensives (P = 0.916), in patients with normal triglyceride levels and increased triglyceride levels (P = 0.975).

CONCLUSION

Addition of fenofibrate to the standard protocol of DME management seems to facilitate reduction of CMT and probably have an added benefit on the visual functions.

The effect of fenofibrate on early retinal nerve fiber layer loss in type 2 diabetic patients: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggested that use of fenofibrate could significantly reduce the rate of progression into diabetic retinopathy (DR), and that retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss, which has been considered an important indicator for retinal neurodegeneration, might precede microvascular changes. The aim of this study was to assess the effect(s) of fenofibrate on RNFL thickness at early stage of DR in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

In this retrospective matched case-control study we included a cohort of 89 patients with type 2 DM, aged 40 or above, between Jan 1, 2017 and March 31, 2017. Among the subjects, 48 patients received fenofibrate therapy and the other 41 patients did not receive fenofibrate treatment. We defined use of fenofibrate as the presence of any prescription for fenofibrate within 1 year before or any time after the diagnosis of DM, and all the patients had either no DR or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). The fibrate users were well matched with non-fenofibrate users for gender, age and axial length. The RNFL thickness in all quadrants of both eyes was examined with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the association of RNFL thickness with potential risk factors of DR other than fenofibrate use.

RESULTS

The non-fenofibrate users had significantly reduced RNFL thickness of the superior quadrant of the right eye compared to the fenofibrate users (t = 2.384, P = 0.019). On the contrary, BMI (p = 0.034) and ACR (p = 0.024) were both negatively correlated to the RNFL thickness of the right eye.

CONCLUSION

Oral administration of fenofibrate was suggestively associated with thicker RNFL in superior quadrant of the right eye of patents with early DR.

Therapeutic Effects of PPARα Agonist on Ocular Neovascularization in Models Recapitulating Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate effects of fenofibric acid (Feno-FA), a peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor-alpha (PPARα) agonist, on ocular neovascularization (NV) in models recapitulating neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and to explore whether the effects are PPARα dependent.

Methods

Laser-induced choroidal NV (CNV) in rats and very low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout (Vldlr^−/−) mice received daily intraperitoneal injections of Feno-FA or vehicle. Vascular leakage was examined by fundus fluorescein angiography and permeability assay using Evans blue as tracer. In CNV rats, severity of CNV was evaluated by CNV areas and CNV volume. In Vldlr^−/− mice, subretinal NV (SRNV) and intraretinal NV (IRNV) were quantified in choroid flat mount and retina flat mount, respectively. Inflammatory factors were measured using Western blotting and retinal leukostasis assay. Further, Pparα^−/− mice and age-matched wild-type (WT) mice were used for laser-induced CNV and treated with Feno-FA to explore the underlying mechanism.

Results

Feno-FA significantly reduced vascular leakage in CNV rats and Vldlr^−/− mice, reduced CNV volume in laser-induced CNV rats, and suppressed SRNV and IRNV in Vldlr^−/− mice. In addition, Feno-FA downregulated the expression of inflammatory factors, including VEGF, TNF-α, and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), in the eyecups of CNV rats and decreased adherent retinal leukocytes in Vldlr^−/− mice. Furthermore, Pparα^−/− mice developed more severe CNV compared with WT mice, and PPARα knockout abolished the beneficial effects of Feno-FA on CNV.

Conclusions

Feno-FA has therapeutic effects on ocular NV in models recapitulating neovascular AMD through a PPARα-dependent mechanism.

Role of lipid-lowering agents in the management of diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy affects a substantial proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and is the leading cause of blindness in working-aged adults. Even though the incidence of diabetic retinopathy has declined in the last decades, its prevalence increased and is expected to rise further as a result of the increasing incidence of type 2 DM (T2DM) and the longer life expectancy of patients with DM. The pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy is multifactorial. Some observational studies suggested an association between dyslipidemia and the development and progression of retinopathy in patients with DM but others did not confirm this association. Regarding lipid-lowering agents, studies that evaluated the role of statins in the management of these patients are mostly small and yielded discrepant results. Large randomized studies with statins in patients with T2DM showed no benefit of these agents on diabetic retinopathy but were not designed to address this effect. In contrast, both preclinical data and two large randomized controlled studies, the FIELD and the ACCORD trial, showed that fenofibrate delays the progression of diabetic retinopathy. Even though the mechanisms underpinning this favorable effect are not entirely clear, these findings suggest that fenofibrate might represent a useful tool for the management of diabetic retinopathy.

Fenofibrate and Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy, a common and sight-threatening microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus, is a leading cause of blindness among working-aged adults. Medical therapies including intensive control of hyperglycemia and hypertension have been shown to reduce the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. The association of dyslipidemia and treatment with statins with diabetic retinopathy is inconsistent in epidemiologic studies. However, two recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated beneficial effects of systemic fenofibrate therapy in reducing the progression of diabetic retinopathy independently of serum lipid levels. These findings suggest that fenofibrate may be an effective strategy for reducing the progression of diabetic retinopathy, thus reducing the large and growing public health burden of treating the sight-threatening complications of diabetic retinopathy.

Fenofibrate Inhibits Cytochrome P450 Epoxygenase 2C Activity to Suppress Pathological Ocular Angiogenesis

Neovascular eye diseases including retinopathy of prematurity, diabetic retinopathy and age-related-macular-degeneration are major causes of blindness. Fenofibrate treatment in type 2 diabetes patients reduces progression of diabetic retinopathy independent of its peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)α agonist lipid lowering effect. The mechanism is unknown. Fenofibrate binds to and inhibits cytochrome P450 epoxygenase (CYP)2C with higher affinity than to PPARα. CYP2C metabolizes ω-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs). While ω-3 LCPUFA products from other metabolizing pathways decrease retinal and choroidal neovascularization, CYP2C products of both ω-3 and ω-6 LCPUFAs promote angiogenesis. We hypothesized that fenofibrate inhibits retinopathy by reducing CYP2C ω-3 LCPUFA (and ω-6 LCPUFA) pro-angiogenic metabolites. Fenofibrate reduced retinal and choroidal neovascularization in PPARα-/-mice and augmented ω-3 LCPUFA protection via CYP2C inhibition. Fenofibrate suppressed retinal and choroidal neovascularization in mice overexpressing human CYP2C8 in endothelial cells and reduced plasma levels of the pro-angiogenic ω-3 LCPUFA CYP2C8 product, 19,20-epoxydocosapentaenoic acid. 19,20-epoxydocosapentaenoic acid reversed fenofibrate-induced suppression of angiogenesis ex vivo and suppression of endothelial cell functions in vitro. In summary fenofibrate suppressed retinal and choroidal neovascularization via CYP2C inhibition as well as by acting as an agonist of PPARα. Fenofibrate augmented the overall protective effects of ω-3 LCPUFAs on neovascular eye diseases.

•

Fenofibrate inhibits retinal and choroidal neovascularization by inhibiting CYP2C activity as well as by activating PPARα.

•

Fenofibrate augments the protective effects of ω-3 LCPUFAs on pathological ocular angiogenesis.

•

Inhibition of CYP2C is a potential therapeutic approach for treatment of proliferative retinopathy and neovascular AMD.

Findings from clinical trials indicate that fenofibrate reduces the progression of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, but the mechanism of this effect is currently unknown. Dietary intake of ω-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) is generally associated with a suppression of proliferative retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration acting through LCPUFA cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase metabolites. However, cytochrome P450 epoxygenase (CYP)2C ω-3 and ω-6 LCPUFA metabolites promote retinopathy. Fenofibrate is a potent inhibitor of CYP2C. Our findings suggested that fenofibrate suppressed retinal and choroidal neovascularization via CYP2C inhibition. Combination therapy of dietary ω-3 LCPUFA supplementation with fenofibrate may be a promising approach to prevent incidence or progression of neovascular eye diseases.

Delayed treatment with fenofibrate protects against high-fat diet-induced kidney injury in mice: the possible role of AMPK autophagy

Fenofibrate activates not only peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) but also adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK-mediated cellular responses protect kidney from high-fat diet (HFD)-induced injury, and autophagy resulting from AMPK activation has been regarded as a stress-response mechanism. Thus the present study examined the role of AMPK and autophagy in the renotherapeutic effects of fenofibrate. C57BL/6J mice were divided into three groups: normal diet (ND), HFD, and HFD + fenofibrate (HFD + FF). Fenofibrate was administered 4 wk after the initiation of the HFD when renal injury was initiated. Mouse proximal tubule cells (mProx24) were used to clarify the role of AMPK. Feeding mice with HFD for 12 wk induced insulin resistance and kidney injury such as albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, tubular injury, and inflammation, which were effectively inhibited by fenofibrate. In addition, fenofibrate treatment resulted in the activation of renal AMPK, upregulation of fatty acid oxidation (FAO) enzymes and antioxidants, and induction of autophagy in the HFD mice. In mProx24 cells, fenofibrate activated AMPK in a concentration-dependent manner, upregulated FAO enzymes and antioxidants, and induced autophagy, all of which were inhibited by treatment of compound C, an AMPK inhibitor. Fenofibrate-induced autophagy was also significantly blocked by AMPKα1 siRNA but not by PPARα siRNA. Collectively, these results demonstrate that delayed treatment with fenofibrate has a therapeutic effect on HFD-induced kidney injury, at least in part, through the activation of AMPK and induction of subsequent downstream effectors: autophagy, FAO enzymes, and antioxidants.

Ten Emerging Trends in the Epidemiology of Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE

Diabetes is a major public health problem affecting 415 million people worldwide. With the increasing prevalence of diabetes, diabetic retinopathy (DR) is emerging as the leading cause of avoidable blindness worldwide.

METHODS

We reviewed previous and recent literature to provide an overview of emerging trends on the burden, epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of DR.

RESULTS

First, there is clear evidence of a global increase in the prevalence of diabetes. Second, there is a decline in the incidence of blindness due to DR, particularly in developed countries. Third, diabetic macular edema (DME) rather than proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the increasingly common cause of visual impairment. Fourth, DR awareness remains patchy and low in most populations. Fifth, hyperglycemia remains the most consistent risk factor for DR in type 1 diabetes across different studies and populations. Sixth, in contrast, blood pressure is an important risk factor for DR in type 2 diabetes. Seventh, the relationship between dyslipidemia and DR remains unclear, with inconsistent results from different studies and trials. Eighth, the utility of predictive models incorporating multiple risk factors for assessing DR risk requires evaluation. Ninth, photographic screening of DR using tele-ophthalmology platforms is increasingly recognized as being feasible and cost-effective. Finally, DR prevention in low-resource settings cannot follow models developed in high-resource countries and requires different strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The ten trends we observed in the current review may guide planning of public healthcare strategies for the management of DR and prevention of blindness.

Beneficial effects of fenofibric acid on overexpression of extracellular matrix components, COX-2, and impairment of endothelial permeability associated with diabetic retinopathy

In the Fenofibric Acid (FA) Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, FA, a lipid-lowering drug, has been shown to significantly reduce macular edema in diabetic patients. In the present study, we investigated whether FA reduces vascular permeability by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), a critical mediator of inflammation, and reducing overexpression of fibronectin (FN) and collagen IV (Coll IV), two basement membrane (BM) components upregulated in diabetic retinopathy. Rat retinal endothelial cells (RRECs) were grown in normal (N:5 mM glucose) or high glucose (HG:30 mM glucose) medium with or without FA for 7 days. Total protein isolated from these cells was assessed for FN, Coll IV, COX-2, and zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1), a tight junction protein, using Western blot analysis. In addition, the distribution and localization of ZO-1 was determined by immunofluorescence microscopy, and cell monolayer permeability was studied by in vitro permeability (IVP) assay. RRECs grown in HG medium showed significant increase in FN, Coll IV, and COX-2 expression (179%, 144%, 139% of N respectively), and a decrease in ZO-1 expression (48% of N) compared to those of N cells. Cells grown in HG medium supplemented with FA significantly reduced FN, Coll IV, and COX-2 expression by 47%, 32%, and 34% respectively, with concomitant increase in ZO-1 expression by 42%. In parallel studies, IVP assays showed a significant increase (139% of N) in cell monolayer permeability in RRECs grown in HG medium, which was significantly reduced with FA treatment. Additionally, immunostaining results indicated FA prevents HG-induced downregulation of ZO-1. The findings indicate that the beneficial effect of FA in reducing excess permeability is mediated, at least in part, by downregulating abnormal overexpression of BM components and inflammatory factors and preventing compromised tight junctions associated with diabetic retinopathy.

Is fenofibrate a reasonable treatment for diabetic microvascular disease?

Type 2 diabetes is a pandemic disease, and its prevalence is increasing mainly due to an increase in obesity and life expectancy. Diabetic complications and their comorbidities constitute the most important economic cost of the disease and represent a significant economic burden for the healthcare systems of developed countries. Despite improving standards of care, people with diabetes remain at risk of the development and progression of microvascular diabetic complications. Therefore, the identification of novel therapeutic approaches is necessary. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the clinical benefits of fenofibrate on microvascular diabetic complications, with special emphasis on diabetic retinopathy. In addition, the potential mechanisms of action will be briefly discussed.

Fenofibrate in cancer: mechanisms involved in anticancer activity

Objective: To review the mechanisms of anti-cancer activity of fenofibrate (FF) and other Peroxisome Proliferator Activator Receptor α (PPARα) agonists based on evidences reported in the published literature.Methods: We extensively reviewed the literature concerning FF as an off target anti-cancer drug. Controversies regarding conflicting findings were also addressed.Results: The main mechanism involved in anti-cancer activity is anti-angiogenesis through down-regulation of  Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) and Hypoxia Inducible factor-1 α (HIF-1α), inhibition of endothelial cell migration, up-regulation of endostatin and thrombospondin-1, but there are many other contributing mechanisms like apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, down-regulation of Nuclear Factor Kappa B (NF-kB) and Protein kinase B (Akt) and decrease of cellular energy by impairing mitochondrial function. Growth impairment is related to down-regulation of Phospho-Inositol 3 Kinase (PI3K)/Akt axis and down-regulation of the p38 map kinase (MAPK) cascade. A possible role should be assigned to FF stimulated over-expression of Tribbles Homolog-3 (TRIB3) which inhibits Akt phosphorylation. Important anti-cancer and anti-metastatic activities are due to down-regulation of MCP-1 (monocyte chemotactic protein-1), decreased Metalloprotease-9 (MMP-9) production, weak down-regulation of adhesion molecules like E selectin, intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAM) and Vascular Endothelial Adhesion Molecules (VCAM), and decreased secretion of chemokines like Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and down-regulation of cyclin D-1. There is no direct link between FF activity in lipid metabolism and anticancer activity, except for the fact that many anticancer actions are dependent from PPARα agonism. FF exhibits also PPARα independent anti-cancer activities.Conclusions: There are strong evidences indicating that FF can disrupt growth-related activities in many different cancers, due to anti-angiogenesis and anti-inflammatory effects. Therefore FF may be useful as a complementary adjunct treatment of cancer, particularly included in anti-angiogenic protocols like those currently increasingly used in glioblastoma. There are sound reasons to initiate well planned phase II clinical trials for FF as a complementary adjunct treatment of cancer.

Effect of fenofibrate on retinal neurodegeneration in an experimental model of type 2 diabetes

There is now consistent evidence from two major clinical trials (the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Eye) that fenofibrate arrests the progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients. However, the underlying mechanisms of this beneficial effect remain to be elucidated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential effect of fenofibric acid (FA), the active metabolite of fenofibrate, in preventing retinal neurodegeneration in an experimental mouse model of type 2 diabetes. For this purpose, we evaluated a total of 24 diabetic mice (db/db) aged 8 weeks that were randomly assigned to daily oral treatment (by gavage) with FA (100 mg/kg/day) (n = 12) or vehicle (n = 12) for 1 week. Ten non-diabetic mice (db/+) were used as control group. Retinal neurodegeneration was evaluated by measuring glial activation (immunofluorescence and Western blot) and apoptosis. Glutamate/aspartate transporter (GLAST) was assessed by immunofluorescence. Functional abnormalities were assessed by electroretinography (ERG). We observed that diabetic mice presented significantly higher glial activation and apoptosis in ganglion cell layer (GCL) than in age-matched non-diabetic mice. Treatment with FA resulted in a significant decrease in both glial activation and the rate of apoptosis in GCL in comparison with diabetic mice treated with vehicle. In addition, FA prevented GLAST downregulation induced by diabetes. Furthermore, a significant improvement of ERG parameters (oscillatory potential amplitudes and b-wave implicit time) was observed. We conclude that FA prevents retinal neurodegeneration induced by diabetes. Our results suggest that neuroprotection is one of the underlying mechanisms by which fenofibrate exerts its beneficial actions in diabetic retinopathy.

Non-traditional systemic treatments for diabetic retinopathy: an evidence-based review

The rapid escalation in the global prevalence diabetes, with more than 30% being afflicted with diabetic retinopathy (DR), means it is likely that associated vision-threatening conditions will also rise substantially. This means that new therapeutic approaches need to be found that go beyond the current standards of diabetic care, and which are effective in the early stages of the disease. In recent decades several new pharmacological agents have been investigated for their effectiveness in preventing the appearance and progression of DR or in reversing DR; some with limited success while others appear promising. This up-to-date critical review of non-traditional systemic treatments for DR is based on the published evidence in MEDLINE spanning 1980-December 2014. It discusses a number of therapeutic options, paying particular attention to the mechanisms of action and the clinical evidence for the use of renin-angiotensin system blockade, fenofibrate and calcium dobesilate monohydrate in DR.

Fenofibrate improves renal lipotoxicity through activation of AMPK-PGC-1α in db/db mice

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α, a lipid-sensing transcriptional factor, serves an important role in lipotoxicity. We evaluated whether fenofibrate has a renoprotective effect by ameliorating lipotoxicity in the kidney. Eight-week-old male C57BLKS/J db/m control and db/db mice, divided into four groups, received fenofibrate for 12 weeks. In db/db mice, fenofibrate ameliorated albuminuria, mesangial area expansion and inflammatory cell infiltration. Fenofibrate inhibited accumulation of intra-renal free fatty acids and triglycerides related to increases in PPARα expression, phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), and activation of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α)-estrogen-related receptor (ERR)-1α-phosphorylated acetyl-CoA carboxylase (pACC), and suppression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)-1 and carbohydrate regulatory element-binding protein (ChREBP)-1, key downstream effectors of lipid metabolism. Fenofibrate decreased the activity of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)-Akt phosphorylation and FoxO3a phosphorylation in kidneys, increasing the B cell leukaemia/lymphoma 2 (BCL-2)/BCL-2-associated X protein (BAX) ratio and superoxide dismutase (SOD) 1 levels. Consequently, fenofibrate recovered from renal apoptosis and oxidative stress, as reflected by 24 hr urinary 8-isoprostane. In cultured mesangial cells, fenofibrate prevented high glucose-induced apoptosis and oxidative stress through phosphorylation of AMPK, activation of PGC-1α-ERR-1α, and suppression of SREBP-1 and ChREBP-1. Our results suggest that fenofibrate improves lipotoxicity via activation of AMPK-PGC-1α-ERR-1α-FoxO3a signaling, showing its potential as a therapeutic modality for diabetic nephropathy.

Should we start all patients with diabetic retinopathy on fenofibrates?

There remains a need for strategies that are effective in preventing diabetic retinopathy (DR) or slowing down its progression, which is safe, well-tolerated, and more effective, have a lower risk profile, easy to perform, have more predictable results with less morbidity than the current regimens. Physicians caring for diabetic patients not only need to maximize glycemic control, but also closely monitor and treat other systemic conditions. The consistency of clinical data from the fenofibrate studies showed consistent beneficial effects with fenofibrate in slowing the progression of DR. They demonstrated significant benefit on micro-vascular (i.e., retinopathy and nephropathy) outcome, possibly independent of lipid levels. Can we combine the effectiveness of the current standard procedures with the prevention and slowing down of progression of DR that fenofibrates can offer? Knowledge of the primary mode of action of fenofibrate will be useful for both physicians and patients in determining how best to use this drug as an adjunct in the management of DR and ultimately facilitating the translation of clinical trial data to clinical practice.

Systemic medical management of diabetic retinopathy

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has assumed epidemic proportions and as a consequence, diabetic retinopathy is expected to be a major societal problem across the world. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects the vision by way of proliferative disease that results in vitreous hemorrhage and traction retinal detachment or by way of diabetic maculopathy (DME). The present-day management of diabetic retinopathy revolves around screening the diabetics for evidence of retinopathy and treating the retinopathy with laser photocoagulation. DME is treated with laser photocoagulation and/or intra- vitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents or steroids. Laser remains the mainstay of treatment and is potentially destructive. Systemic management aims at preventing or delaying the onset of retinopathy; reversing the early retinopathy; or delaying the progression of established retinopathy. Evidence from multiple studies has confirmed the protective role of rigid control of blood glucose and blood pressure. The evidence for lipid control versus maculopathy was less definitive. However, the use of fenofibrates (originally used for lowering serum lipids) has shown a benefit on both proliferative disease and maculopathy outside their lipid-lowering effect. Other drugs being tried are the Protein Kinase C (PKC) inhibitors, other peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) agonists, Forsoklin (which binds GLUT 1 receptor), minocycline (for its anti inflammatory effect), and Celecoxib (Cox-2 inhibitor).

Beta-lapachone inhibits pathological retinal neovascularization in oxygen-induced retinopathy via regulation of HIF-1α

Retinal neovascularization in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is the most common cause of blindness for children. Despite evidence that hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α -VEGF axis is associated with the pathogenesis of ROP, the inhibitors of HIF-1α have not been established as a therapeutic target in the control of ROP pathophysiology. We investigated the hypothesis that degradation of HIF-1α as a master regulator of angiogenesis in hypoxic condition, using β-lapachone, would confer protection against hypoxia-induced retinopathy without affecting physiological vascular development in mice with oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR), an animal model of ROP. The effects of β-lapachone were examined after intraocular injection in mice with OIR. Intraocular administration of β-lapachone resulted in significant reduction in hypoxia-induced retinal neovascularization without retinal toxicity or perturbation of developmental retinal angiogenesis. Our results demonstrate that HIF-1α–mediated VEGF expression in OIR is associated with pathological neovascularization, not physiological angiogenesis. Thus, strategies blocking HIF-1α in the developing eye in the pathological hypoxia could serve as a novel therapeutic target for ROP.

Primary prevention of diabetic retinopathy with fibrates: a retrospective, matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in people with type 2 diabetes treated with fibrates with that of non-exposed controls.

DESIGN

Retrospective, matched cohort study.

SETTING

UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

PARTICIPANTS

5038 people with type 2 diabetes with a history of fibrate exposure but without evidence of DR were identified. Three thousand one hundred and seventy-six (63%) people could be randomly matched to one non-exposed control; of these, 2599 (81.8%) were matched without any missing blood pressure or glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was first recorded DR with a secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality or first DR. Time to clinical endpoints was compared using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 5.1 and 5.0 years for fibrate-exposed and non-exposed patients, respectively. For fibrate-exposed participants, there was a reduction in DR: 33.4 events/1000 person-years vs 40.4 (p=0.002), and in death or DR: 50.6 vs 60.2 (p<0.001). For those matched with full systolic blood pressure and HbA1c data, crude event rates were 34.3 versus 43.9 for DR (p<0.001) and 51.2 vs 63.4 (p<0.001) for death or DR. Following adjustment, DR was significantly delayed for those treated with fibrates, with an adjusted HR (aHR) of 0.785 (p<0.001) for participants with complete data and an aHR of 0.802 (p<0.001) for all participants.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment with fibrates in people with type 2 diabetes was independently associated with reduced progression to a first diagnosis of DR.

An update on the molecular actions of fenofibrate and its clinical effects on diabetic retinopathy and other microvascular end points in patients with diabetes

The drug fenofibrate has received major attention as a novel medical treatment for diabetic retinopathy (DR) and other diabetes-induced microvascular complications. This interest stems from two recent large, well-designed clinical trials that demonstrated large reductions in the progression of DR and the need for laser intervention, in addition to a reduction in renal and neurological outcomes, in patients with type 2 diabetes. In both trials, the greatest benefit on DR progression was observed in those patients with DR at baseline. Originally considered a lipid-modifying drug, it now appears that multiple mechanisms may underpin the benefit of fenofibrate on diabetic microvascular end points. Fenofibrate regulates the expression of many different genes, with a range of beneficial effects on lipid control, inflammation, angiogenesis, and cell apoptosis. These factors are believed to be important in the development of DR regardless of the underlying diabetes etiology. Cell experiments have demonstrated improved survival of retinal endothelial and pigment epithelial cells in conjunction with reduced stress signaling under diabetic conditions. Further, fenofibrate improves retinal outcomes in rodent models of diabetes and retinal neovascularization. Given the results of these preclinical studies, further clinical trials are needed to establish the benefits of fenofibrate in other forms of diabetes, including type 1 diabetes. In DR management, fenofibrate could be a useful adjunctive treatment to modifiable risk factor control and regular ophthalmic review. Its incorporation into clinical practice should be continually revised as more information becomes available.

Ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta suppresses cathepsin B expression in human endothelial cells in a posttranslational manner

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) delta agonists are known to have distinct anti-inflammatory and antitumor effects; though, the knowledge regarding their mode of action has thus far been limited. Different cathepsins have been shown to be upregulated in a broad range of pathological events, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, atherosclerosis and diverse tumor entities, for example melanoma. Recent work demonstrated that cathepsin B in particular is an important pro-angiogenic protease in various pathological conditions. We therefore analysed whether cathepsins are a valid target for PPARδ agonists. This study reveals an inhibitory effect of two commonly used PPARδ agonists, GW501516 and L-165,041, on the protein expression and enzyme activity of cathepsin B in human endothelial cells. In contrast, no inhibitory effects were observed on cathepsin L and cathepsin D protein expression after treatment with PPARδ agonists. Furthermore, the results substantiate that PPARδ activators mediate their inhibitory action in a PPARδ-dependent manner and that the underlying regulatory mechanism is not based on a transcriptional but rather on a posttranslational mode of action, via the reduction in the cathepsin B protein half-life. Mechanisms conveying the suppressive effect by 5'-alternative splicing, a 3'-UTR-dependent way or by miRNA could be excluded. The data of this study explore cathepsin B as a new valid target for PPARδ agonists in endothelial cells. The results bolster other studies demonstrating PPARδ agonists as anti-inflammatory and anticarcinogenic agents and thus might have the potential to help to develop new pharmaceutical drugs.

Molecular Implications of the PPARs in the Diabetic Eye

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains as the leading cause of blindness among working age individuals in developed countries. Current treatments for DR (laser photocoagulation, intravitreal corticosteroids, intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, and vitreoretinal surgery) are applicable only at advanced stages of the disease and are associated with significant adverse effects. Therefore, new pharmacological treatments for the early stages of the disease are needed. Emerging evidence indicates that peroxisome proliferator-activator receptors (PPARs) agonists (in particular PPARα) are useful for the treatment of DR. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are far from being elucidated. This paper mainly focuses on PPARs expression in the diabetic eye, its molecular implications, and the effect of PPAR agonists as a new approach for the treatment of DR. The availability of this new strategy will not only be beneficial in treating DR but may also result in a shift towards treating earlier stages of diabetic retinopathy, thus easing the burden of this devastating disease (Cheung et al. (2010)).

Modified Lipoproteins in Diabetic Retinopathy: A Local Action in the Retina

Clinical epidemiological studies have revealed relatively weak, yet statistically significant, associations between dyslipidemia/dyslipoproteinemia and diabetic retinopathy (DR). Recent large interventional studies, however, demonstrated an unexpectedly robust efficacy of fenofibrate on the development of DR, possibly independent of plasma lipids. To unify the apparent discrepancies, we hypothesize that plasma lipoproteins play an indirect but important role in DR, contingent on the integrity of the blood-retina-barrier (BRB). In retinas with an intact BRB, plasma lipoproteins may be largely irrelevant; however, important effects become operative after the BRB is impaired in diabetes, leading to lipoprotein extravasation and subsequent modification, hence toxicity to the neighbouring retinal cells. In this hypothesis, BRB leakage is the key, plasma lipoprotein concentrations mainly modulate its consequences, and fenofibrate has intra-retinal actions. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the direct effects and mechanisms of modified lipoproteins on retinal cells and their potential contribution to the pathogenesis of DR.